Accepting Muslim minority practices: A case of discriminatory or normative intolerance?
West European societies have seen strong debates about the acceptance of Muslim minority practices. In the current research we sought to better understand intolerance by examining whether people use a double standard in which the same practices are tolerated of Christians but not of Muslims (discrim...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of community & applied social psychology 2020-07, Vol.30 (4), p.405-418 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 418 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 405 |
container_title | Journal of community & applied social psychology |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Sleijpen, Sander Verkuyten, Maykel Adelman, Levi |
description | West European societies have seen strong debates about the acceptance of Muslim minority practices. In the current research we sought to better understand intolerance by examining whether people use a double standard in which the same practices are tolerated of Christians but not of Muslims (discriminatory intolerance), or rather reject the practices independently of the religious minority group because these are considered to contradict society's normative ways of life (normative intolerance). The results of two survey‐embedded experiments among native Dutch were most in agreement with an interpretation in terms of normative intolerance rather than discriminatory intolerance. This suggests that the rejection of Muslim practices has less to do with Muslims per se but rather with the perceived normative deviance of the practices, independently of the religious minority group. These findings broaden the research on anti‐Muslim sentiments and thereby the debate on the place of Islam within Western liberal societies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/casp.2450 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7383984</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2421421619</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4430-c7825917957d5fd80592b1b76fbd1a15e3f7f24881283f47ba319b1ce579bbc03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV9L3TAYh4NsePTMi30BCXgzL6r505wkXijloNtAcbANL0OapsdI29SkPaPffumOk20wCCTwPjz5vfwAeI_RGUaInBsd-zOSM7QHDjCSMsNEijfzm5FMEpEvwGGMTwihlWSrfbCghFOKCToAD4Uxth9ct4F3Y2xcC1vX-eCGCfZBm8EZGy9gAdMXFvoaVi6a4BKjBx8m6ANMdKsHt7XQdYNvbNCdsVfvwNtaN9EevdxL8P3m-tv6U3Z7__HzurjNTJ5TlBkuCJOYS8YrVlcCMUlKXPJVXVZYY2ZpzWuSC4GJoHXOS02xLLGxjMuyNIguweXO249laytjuyHoRvUpow6T8tqpvyede1Qbv1WcCipFngQfXgTBP482DqpNK9qm0Z31Y1QkJ5JziRBN6Mk_6JMfQ5fWmymczgrLRJ3uKBN8jMHWr2EwUnNdaq5LzXUl9vjP9K_k734ScL4DfrjGTv83qXXx9csv5U_DSqAQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2421421619</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Accepting Muslim minority practices: A case of discriminatory or normative intolerance?</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Sleijpen, Sander ; Verkuyten, Maykel ; Adelman, Levi</creator><creatorcontrib>Sleijpen, Sander ; Verkuyten, Maykel ; Adelman, Levi</creatorcontrib><description>West European societies have seen strong debates about the acceptance of Muslim minority practices. In the current research we sought to better understand intolerance by examining whether people use a double standard in which the same practices are tolerated of Christians but not of Muslims (discriminatory intolerance), or rather reject the practices independently of the religious minority group because these are considered to contradict society's normative ways of life (normative intolerance). The results of two survey‐embedded experiments among native Dutch were most in agreement with an interpretation in terms of normative intolerance rather than discriminatory intolerance. This suggests that the rejection of Muslim practices has less to do with Muslims per se but rather with the perceived normative deviance of the practices, independently of the religious minority group. These findings broaden the research on anti‐Muslim sentiments and thereby the debate on the place of Islam within Western liberal societies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1052-9284</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1298</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/casp.2450</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32733120</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Christians ; Deviance ; discrimination ; Islam ; Minority groups ; Muslims ; norms ; tolerance</subject><ispartof>Journal of community & applied social psychology, 2020-07, Vol.30 (4), p.405-418</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2020 The Authors. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2020. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4430-c7825917957d5fd80592b1b76fbd1a15e3f7f24881283f47ba319b1ce579bbc03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4430-c7825917957d5fd80592b1b76fbd1a15e3f7f24881283f47ba319b1ce579bbc03</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0137-1527</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcasp.2450$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcasp.2450$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,30999,33774,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32733120$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sleijpen, Sander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verkuyten, Maykel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adelman, Levi</creatorcontrib><title>Accepting Muslim minority practices: A case of discriminatory or normative intolerance?</title><title>Journal of community & applied social psychology</title><addtitle>J Community Appl Soc Psychol</addtitle><description>West European societies have seen strong debates about the acceptance of Muslim minority practices. In the current research we sought to better understand intolerance by examining whether people use a double standard in which the same practices are tolerated of Christians but not of Muslims (discriminatory intolerance), or rather reject the practices independently of the religious minority group because these are considered to contradict society's normative ways of life (normative intolerance). The results of two survey‐embedded experiments among native Dutch were most in agreement with an interpretation in terms of normative intolerance rather than discriminatory intolerance. This suggests that the rejection of Muslim practices has less to do with Muslims per se but rather with the perceived normative deviance of the practices, independently of the religious minority group. These findings broaden the research on anti‐Muslim sentiments and thereby the debate on the place of Islam within Western liberal societies.</description><subject>Christians</subject><subject>Deviance</subject><subject>discrimination</subject><subject>Islam</subject><subject>Minority groups</subject><subject>Muslims</subject><subject>norms</subject><subject>tolerance</subject><issn>1052-9284</issn><issn>1099-1298</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kV9L3TAYh4NsePTMi30BCXgzL6r505wkXijloNtAcbANL0OapsdI29SkPaPffumOk20wCCTwPjz5vfwAeI_RGUaInBsd-zOSM7QHDjCSMsNEijfzm5FMEpEvwGGMTwihlWSrfbCghFOKCToAD4Uxth9ct4F3Y2xcC1vX-eCGCfZBm8EZGy9gAdMXFvoaVi6a4BKjBx8m6ANMdKsHt7XQdYNvbNCdsVfvwNtaN9EevdxL8P3m-tv6U3Z7__HzurjNTJ5TlBkuCJOYS8YrVlcCMUlKXPJVXVZYY2ZpzWuSC4GJoHXOS02xLLGxjMuyNIguweXO249laytjuyHoRvUpow6T8tqpvyede1Qbv1WcCipFngQfXgTBP482DqpNK9qm0Z31Y1QkJ5JziRBN6Mk_6JMfQ5fWmymczgrLRJ3uKBN8jMHWr2EwUnNdaq5LzXUl9vjP9K_k734ScL4DfrjGTv83qXXx9csv5U_DSqAQ</recordid><startdate>202007</startdate><enddate>202007</enddate><creator>Sleijpen, Sander</creator><creator>Verkuyten, Maykel</creator><creator>Adelman, Levi</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0137-1527</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202007</creationdate><title>Accepting Muslim minority practices: A case of discriminatory or normative intolerance?</title><author>Sleijpen, Sander ; Verkuyten, Maykel ; Adelman, Levi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4430-c7825917957d5fd80592b1b76fbd1a15e3f7f24881283f47ba319b1ce579bbc03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Christians</topic><topic>Deviance</topic><topic>discrimination</topic><topic>Islam</topic><topic>Minority groups</topic><topic>Muslims</topic><topic>norms</topic><topic>tolerance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sleijpen, Sander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verkuyten, Maykel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adelman, Levi</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of community & applied social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sleijpen, Sander</au><au>Verkuyten, Maykel</au><au>Adelman, Levi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Accepting Muslim minority practices: A case of discriminatory or normative intolerance?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of community & applied social psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Community Appl Soc Psychol</addtitle><date>2020-07</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>405</spage><epage>418</epage><pages>405-418</pages><issn>1052-9284</issn><eissn>1099-1298</eissn><abstract>West European societies have seen strong debates about the acceptance of Muslim minority practices. In the current research we sought to better understand intolerance by examining whether people use a double standard in which the same practices are tolerated of Christians but not of Muslims (discriminatory intolerance), or rather reject the practices independently of the religious minority group because these are considered to contradict society's normative ways of life (normative intolerance). The results of two survey‐embedded experiments among native Dutch were most in agreement with an interpretation in terms of normative intolerance rather than discriminatory intolerance. This suggests that the rejection of Muslim practices has less to do with Muslims per se but rather with the perceived normative deviance of the practices, independently of the religious minority group. These findings broaden the research on anti‐Muslim sentiments and thereby the debate on the place of Islam within Western liberal societies.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>32733120</pmid><doi>10.1002/casp.2450</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0137-1527</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1052-9284 |
ispartof | Journal of community & applied social psychology, 2020-07, Vol.30 (4), p.405-418 |
issn | 1052-9284 1099-1298 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7383984 |
source | Sociological Abstracts; Access via Wiley Online Library; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Christians Deviance discrimination Islam Minority groups Muslims norms tolerance |
title | Accepting Muslim minority practices: A case of discriminatory or normative intolerance? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T14%3A27%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accepting%20Muslim%20minority%20practices:%20A%20case%20of%20discriminatory%20or%20normative%20intolerance?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20community%20&%20applied%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Sleijpen,%20Sander&rft.date=2020-07&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=405&rft.epage=418&rft.pages=405-418&rft.issn=1052-9284&rft.eissn=1099-1298&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/casp.2450&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2421421619%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2421421619&rft_id=info:pmid/32733120&rfr_iscdi=true |