Comparison of Two High-Throughput Reverse Transcription-PCR Systems for the Detection of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has emerged as the cause of a worldwide pandemic. Many commercial SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assays have received Emergency Use Authorization from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. However, there are limited data de...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical microbiology 2020-07, Vol.58 (8)
Hauptverfasser: Craney, Arryn R, Velu, Priya D, Satlin, Michael J, Fauntleroy, Kathy A, Callan, Katrina, Robertson, Amy, La Spina, Marisa, Lei, Beryl, Chen, Anqi, Alston, Tricia, Rozman, Anna, Loda, Massimo, Rennert, Hanna, Cushing, Melissa, Westblade, Lars F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 8
container_start_page
container_title Journal of clinical microbiology
container_volume 58
creator Craney, Arryn R
Velu, Priya D
Satlin, Michael J
Fauntleroy, Kathy A
Callan, Katrina
Robertson, Amy
La Spina, Marisa
Lei, Beryl
Chen, Anqi
Alston, Tricia
Rozman, Anna
Loda, Massimo
Rennert, Hanna
Cushing, Melissa
Westblade, Lars F
description Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has emerged as the cause of a worldwide pandemic. Many commercial SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assays have received Emergency Use Authorization from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. However, there are limited data describing their performance, in particular the performance of high-throughput SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR systems. We analyzed the diagnostic performance of two high-throughput systems: cobas 6800 and Panther Fusion, and their associated RT-PCR assays, with a collection of 389 nasopharyngeal specimens. The overall agreement between the platforms was 96.4% (375/389). Cohen's kappa analysis rated the strength of agreement between the two platforms as "almost perfect" (κ = 0.922; standard error, 0.051). Furthermore, there was no significant difference between corresponding cycle threshold values generated on the two systems ( value = 0.88; Student's test). Taken together, these data imply that the two platforms can be considered comparable in terms of their clinical performance. We believe that this information will be useful for those who have already adopted these platforms or are seeking to implement high-throughput RT-PCR testing to stem the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.
doi_str_mv 10.1128/JCM.00890-20
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7383551</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2400538669</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-85e7f6a6f20383714d22415c139bf81aff397f241f237ba8c32227fa33c3d0753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkUFv1DAQhS0EotuFG2fkIwdSbE-cOBekKlAKKgK1i8TN8nrHG6NNnNrOov0H_GyytFRwGmnmvW9m9Ah5wdkZ50K9-dR-PmNMNawQ7BFZcNaooqrY98dkwVgjC86hPiGnKf1gjJellE_JCQhQvCphQX61oR9N9CkMNDi6-hnopd92xaqLYdp245TpNe4xJqSraIZkox-zD0Pxtb2mN4eUsU_UhUhzh_QdZrTH6RF1c7QhPbdTxpmRRh9NDvEwu4ZNDD3SNsQwmL2PU6LiGXnizC7h8_u6JN8u3q_ay-Lqy4eP7flVYUGVuVASa1eZygkGCmpeboQoubQcmrVT3DgHTe3mlhNQr42yIISonQGwsGG1hCV5e8cdp3WPG4tDjmanx-h7Ew86GK__nwy-09uw1_W8T0o-A17dA2K4nTBl3ftkcbczA4YpaVEyJkFVVTNLX99JbQwpRXQPazjTx_D0HJ7-E56e_1mSl_-e9iD-mxb8Bo4Bl2o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2400538669</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Two High-Throughput Reverse Transcription-PCR Systems for the Detection of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2</title><source>American Society for Microbiology</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Craney, Arryn R ; Velu, Priya D ; Satlin, Michael J ; Fauntleroy, Kathy A ; Callan, Katrina ; Robertson, Amy ; La Spina, Marisa ; Lei, Beryl ; Chen, Anqi ; Alston, Tricia ; Rozman, Anna ; Loda, Massimo ; Rennert, Hanna ; Cushing, Melissa ; Westblade, Lars F</creator><contributor>McAdam, Alexander J.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Craney, Arryn R ; Velu, Priya D ; Satlin, Michael J ; Fauntleroy, Kathy A ; Callan, Katrina ; Robertson, Amy ; La Spina, Marisa ; Lei, Beryl ; Chen, Anqi ; Alston, Tricia ; Rozman, Anna ; Loda, Massimo ; Rennert, Hanna ; Cushing, Melissa ; Westblade, Lars F ; McAdam, Alexander J.</creatorcontrib><description>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has emerged as the cause of a worldwide pandemic. Many commercial SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assays have received Emergency Use Authorization from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. However, there are limited data describing their performance, in particular the performance of high-throughput SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR systems. We analyzed the diagnostic performance of two high-throughput systems: cobas 6800 and Panther Fusion, and their associated RT-PCR assays, with a collection of 389 nasopharyngeal specimens. The overall agreement between the platforms was 96.4% (375/389). Cohen's kappa analysis rated the strength of agreement between the two platforms as "almost perfect" (κ = 0.922; standard error, 0.051). Furthermore, there was no significant difference between corresponding cycle threshold values generated on the two systems ( value = 0.88; Student's test). Taken together, these data imply that the two platforms can be considered comparable in terms of their clinical performance. We believe that this information will be useful for those who have already adopted these platforms or are seeking to implement high-throughput RT-PCR testing to stem the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0095-1137</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-660X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00890-20</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32381643</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society for Microbiology</publisher><subject>Betacoronavirus - genetics ; Betacoronavirus - isolation &amp; purification ; Coronavirus Infections - diagnosis ; Coronavirus Infections - virology ; COVID-19 ; High-Throughput Screening Assays ; Humans ; Nasopharynx - virology ; Pandemics ; Pneumonia, Viral - diagnosis ; Pneumonia, Viral - virology ; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Special Issue ; United States ; Virology</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical microbiology, 2020-07, Vol.58 (8)</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology. 2020 American Society for Microbiology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-85e7f6a6f20383714d22415c139bf81aff397f241f237ba8c32227fa33c3d0753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-85e7f6a6f20383714d22415c139bf81aff397f241f237ba8c32227fa33c3d0753</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7383551/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7383551/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,3174,27903,27904,53770,53772</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32381643$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>McAdam, Alexander J.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Craney, Arryn R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Velu, Priya D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Satlin, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fauntleroy, Kathy A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Callan, Katrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>La Spina, Marisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lei, Beryl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Anqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alston, Tricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rozman, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loda, Massimo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rennert, Hanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cushing, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westblade, Lars F</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Two High-Throughput Reverse Transcription-PCR Systems for the Detection of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2</title><title>Journal of clinical microbiology</title><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><description>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has emerged as the cause of a worldwide pandemic. Many commercial SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assays have received Emergency Use Authorization from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. However, there are limited data describing their performance, in particular the performance of high-throughput SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR systems. We analyzed the diagnostic performance of two high-throughput systems: cobas 6800 and Panther Fusion, and their associated RT-PCR assays, with a collection of 389 nasopharyngeal specimens. The overall agreement between the platforms was 96.4% (375/389). Cohen's kappa analysis rated the strength of agreement between the two platforms as "almost perfect" (κ = 0.922; standard error, 0.051). Furthermore, there was no significant difference between corresponding cycle threshold values generated on the two systems ( value = 0.88; Student's test). Taken together, these data imply that the two platforms can be considered comparable in terms of their clinical performance. We believe that this information will be useful for those who have already adopted these platforms or are seeking to implement high-throughput RT-PCR testing to stem the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.</description><subject>Betacoronavirus - genetics</subject><subject>Betacoronavirus - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Coronavirus Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Coronavirus Infections - virology</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>High-Throughput Screening Assays</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Nasopharynx - virology</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Pneumonia, Viral - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pneumonia, Viral - virology</subject><subject>Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><subject>Special Issue</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Virology</subject><issn>0095-1137</issn><issn>1098-660X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkUFv1DAQhS0EotuFG2fkIwdSbE-cOBekKlAKKgK1i8TN8nrHG6NNnNrOov0H_GyytFRwGmnmvW9m9Ah5wdkZ50K9-dR-PmNMNawQ7BFZcNaooqrY98dkwVgjC86hPiGnKf1gjJellE_JCQhQvCphQX61oR9N9CkMNDi6-hnopd92xaqLYdp245TpNe4xJqSraIZkox-zD0Pxtb2mN4eUsU_UhUhzh_QdZrTH6RF1c7QhPbdTxpmRRh9NDvEwu4ZNDD3SNsQwmL2PU6LiGXnizC7h8_u6JN8u3q_ay-Lqy4eP7flVYUGVuVASa1eZygkGCmpeboQoubQcmrVT3DgHTe3mlhNQr42yIISonQGwsGG1hCV5e8cdp3WPG4tDjmanx-h7Ew86GK__nwy-09uw1_W8T0o-A17dA2K4nTBl3ftkcbczA4YpaVEyJkFVVTNLX99JbQwpRXQPazjTx_D0HJ7-E56e_1mSl_-e9iD-mxb8Bo4Bl2o</recordid><startdate>20200723</startdate><enddate>20200723</enddate><creator>Craney, Arryn R</creator><creator>Velu, Priya D</creator><creator>Satlin, Michael J</creator><creator>Fauntleroy, Kathy A</creator><creator>Callan, Katrina</creator><creator>Robertson, Amy</creator><creator>La Spina, Marisa</creator><creator>Lei, Beryl</creator><creator>Chen, Anqi</creator><creator>Alston, Tricia</creator><creator>Rozman, Anna</creator><creator>Loda, Massimo</creator><creator>Rennert, Hanna</creator><creator>Cushing, Melissa</creator><creator>Westblade, Lars F</creator><general>American Society for Microbiology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200723</creationdate><title>Comparison of Two High-Throughput Reverse Transcription-PCR Systems for the Detection of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2</title><author>Craney, Arryn R ; Velu, Priya D ; Satlin, Michael J ; Fauntleroy, Kathy A ; Callan, Katrina ; Robertson, Amy ; La Spina, Marisa ; Lei, Beryl ; Chen, Anqi ; Alston, Tricia ; Rozman, Anna ; Loda, Massimo ; Rennert, Hanna ; Cushing, Melissa ; Westblade, Lars F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-85e7f6a6f20383714d22415c139bf81aff397f241f237ba8c32227fa33c3d0753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Betacoronavirus - genetics</topic><topic>Betacoronavirus - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Coronavirus Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Coronavirus Infections - virology</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>High-Throughput Screening Assays</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Nasopharynx - virology</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Pneumonia, Viral - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pneumonia, Viral - virology</topic><topic>Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><topic>Special Issue</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Virology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Craney, Arryn R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Velu, Priya D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Satlin, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fauntleroy, Kathy A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Callan, Katrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>La Spina, Marisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lei, Beryl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Anqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alston, Tricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rozman, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loda, Massimo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rennert, Hanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cushing, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westblade, Lars F</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Craney, Arryn R</au><au>Velu, Priya D</au><au>Satlin, Michael J</au><au>Fauntleroy, Kathy A</au><au>Callan, Katrina</au><au>Robertson, Amy</au><au>La Spina, Marisa</au><au>Lei, Beryl</au><au>Chen, Anqi</au><au>Alston, Tricia</au><au>Rozman, Anna</au><au>Loda, Massimo</au><au>Rennert, Hanna</au><au>Cushing, Melissa</au><au>Westblade, Lars F</au><au>McAdam, Alexander J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Two High-Throughput Reverse Transcription-PCR Systems for the Detection of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><date>2020-07-23</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>8</issue><issn>0095-1137</issn><eissn>1098-660X</eissn><abstract>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has emerged as the cause of a worldwide pandemic. Many commercial SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assays have received Emergency Use Authorization from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. However, there are limited data describing their performance, in particular the performance of high-throughput SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR systems. We analyzed the diagnostic performance of two high-throughput systems: cobas 6800 and Panther Fusion, and their associated RT-PCR assays, with a collection of 389 nasopharyngeal specimens. The overall agreement between the platforms was 96.4% (375/389). Cohen's kappa analysis rated the strength of agreement between the two platforms as "almost perfect" (κ = 0.922; standard error, 0.051). Furthermore, there was no significant difference between corresponding cycle threshold values generated on the two systems ( value = 0.88; Student's test). Taken together, these data imply that the two platforms can be considered comparable in terms of their clinical performance. We believe that this information will be useful for those who have already adopted these platforms or are seeking to implement high-throughput RT-PCR testing to stem the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society for Microbiology</pub><pmid>32381643</pmid><doi>10.1128/JCM.00890-20</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0095-1137
ispartof Journal of clinical microbiology, 2020-07, Vol.58 (8)
issn 0095-1137
1098-660X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7383551
source American Society for Microbiology; MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Betacoronavirus - genetics
Betacoronavirus - isolation & purification
Coronavirus Infections - diagnosis
Coronavirus Infections - virology
COVID-19
High-Throughput Screening Assays
Humans
Nasopharynx - virology
Pandemics
Pneumonia, Viral - diagnosis
Pneumonia, Viral - virology
Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods
SARS-CoV-2
Special Issue
United States
Virology
title Comparison of Two High-Throughput Reverse Transcription-PCR Systems for the Detection of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T01%3A03%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Two%20High-Throughput%20Reverse%20Transcription-PCR%20Systems%20for%20the%20Detection%20of%20Severe%20Acute%20Respiratory%20Syndrome%20Coronavirus%202&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20microbiology&rft.au=Craney,%20Arryn%20R&rft.date=2020-07-23&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=8&rft.issn=0095-1137&rft.eissn=1098-660X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1128/JCM.00890-20&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2400538669%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2400538669&rft_id=info:pmid/32381643&rfr_iscdi=true