Comparison of Two High-Throughput Reverse Transcription-PCR Systems for the Detection of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has emerged as the cause of a worldwide pandemic. Many commercial SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assays have received Emergency Use Authorization from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. However, there are limited data de...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical microbiology 2020-07, Vol.58 (8) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of clinical microbiology |
container_volume | 58 |
creator | Craney, Arryn R Velu, Priya D Satlin, Michael J Fauntleroy, Kathy A Callan, Katrina Robertson, Amy La Spina, Marisa Lei, Beryl Chen, Anqi Alston, Tricia Rozman, Anna Loda, Massimo Rennert, Hanna Cushing, Melissa Westblade, Lars F |
description | Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has emerged as the cause of a worldwide pandemic. Many commercial SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assays have received Emergency Use Authorization from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. However, there are limited data describing their performance, in particular the performance of high-throughput SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR systems. We analyzed the diagnostic performance of two high-throughput systems: cobas 6800 and Panther Fusion, and their associated RT-PCR assays, with a collection of 389 nasopharyngeal specimens. The overall agreement between the platforms was 96.4% (375/389). Cohen's kappa analysis rated the strength of agreement between the two platforms as "almost perfect" (κ = 0.922; standard error, 0.051). Furthermore, there was no significant difference between corresponding cycle threshold values generated on the two systems (
value = 0.88; Student's
test). Taken together, these data imply that the two platforms can be considered comparable in terms of their clinical performance. We believe that this information will be useful for those who have already adopted these platforms or are seeking to implement high-throughput RT-PCR testing to stem the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1128/JCM.00890-20 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7383551</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2400538669</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-85e7f6a6f20383714d22415c139bf81aff397f241f237ba8c32227fa33c3d0753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkUFv1DAQhS0EotuFG2fkIwdSbE-cOBekKlAKKgK1i8TN8nrHG6NNnNrOov0H_GyytFRwGmnmvW9m9Ah5wdkZ50K9-dR-PmNMNawQ7BFZcNaooqrY98dkwVgjC86hPiGnKf1gjJellE_JCQhQvCphQX61oR9N9CkMNDi6-hnopd92xaqLYdp245TpNe4xJqSraIZkox-zD0Pxtb2mN4eUsU_UhUhzh_QdZrTH6RF1c7QhPbdTxpmRRh9NDvEwu4ZNDD3SNsQwmL2PU6LiGXnizC7h8_u6JN8u3q_ay-Lqy4eP7flVYUGVuVASa1eZygkGCmpeboQoubQcmrVT3DgHTe3mlhNQr42yIISonQGwsGG1hCV5e8cdp3WPG4tDjmanx-h7Ew86GK__nwy-09uw1_W8T0o-A17dA2K4nTBl3ftkcbczA4YpaVEyJkFVVTNLX99JbQwpRXQPazjTx_D0HJ7-E56e_1mSl_-e9iD-mxb8Bo4Bl2o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2400538669</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Two High-Throughput Reverse Transcription-PCR Systems for the Detection of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2</title><source>American Society for Microbiology</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Craney, Arryn R ; Velu, Priya D ; Satlin, Michael J ; Fauntleroy, Kathy A ; Callan, Katrina ; Robertson, Amy ; La Spina, Marisa ; Lei, Beryl ; Chen, Anqi ; Alston, Tricia ; Rozman, Anna ; Loda, Massimo ; Rennert, Hanna ; Cushing, Melissa ; Westblade, Lars F</creator><contributor>McAdam, Alexander J.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Craney, Arryn R ; Velu, Priya D ; Satlin, Michael J ; Fauntleroy, Kathy A ; Callan, Katrina ; Robertson, Amy ; La Spina, Marisa ; Lei, Beryl ; Chen, Anqi ; Alston, Tricia ; Rozman, Anna ; Loda, Massimo ; Rennert, Hanna ; Cushing, Melissa ; Westblade, Lars F ; McAdam, Alexander J.</creatorcontrib><description>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has emerged as the cause of a worldwide pandemic. Many commercial SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assays have received Emergency Use Authorization from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. However, there are limited data describing their performance, in particular the performance of high-throughput SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR systems. We analyzed the diagnostic performance of two high-throughput systems: cobas 6800 and Panther Fusion, and their associated RT-PCR assays, with a collection of 389 nasopharyngeal specimens. The overall agreement between the platforms was 96.4% (375/389). Cohen's kappa analysis rated the strength of agreement between the two platforms as "almost perfect" (κ = 0.922; standard error, 0.051). Furthermore, there was no significant difference between corresponding cycle threshold values generated on the two systems (
value = 0.88; Student's
test). Taken together, these data imply that the two platforms can be considered comparable in terms of their clinical performance. We believe that this information will be useful for those who have already adopted these platforms or are seeking to implement high-throughput RT-PCR testing to stem the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0095-1137</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-660X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00890-20</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32381643</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society for Microbiology</publisher><subject>Betacoronavirus - genetics ; Betacoronavirus - isolation & purification ; Coronavirus Infections - diagnosis ; Coronavirus Infections - virology ; COVID-19 ; High-Throughput Screening Assays ; Humans ; Nasopharynx - virology ; Pandemics ; Pneumonia, Viral - diagnosis ; Pneumonia, Viral - virology ; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Special Issue ; United States ; Virology</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical microbiology, 2020-07, Vol.58 (8)</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology. 2020 American Society for Microbiology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-85e7f6a6f20383714d22415c139bf81aff397f241f237ba8c32227fa33c3d0753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-85e7f6a6f20383714d22415c139bf81aff397f241f237ba8c32227fa33c3d0753</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7383551/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7383551/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,3174,27903,27904,53770,53772</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32381643$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>McAdam, Alexander J.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Craney, Arryn R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Velu, Priya D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Satlin, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fauntleroy, Kathy A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Callan, Katrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>La Spina, Marisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lei, Beryl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Anqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alston, Tricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rozman, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loda, Massimo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rennert, Hanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cushing, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westblade, Lars F</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Two High-Throughput Reverse Transcription-PCR Systems for the Detection of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2</title><title>Journal of clinical microbiology</title><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><description>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has emerged as the cause of a worldwide pandemic. Many commercial SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assays have received Emergency Use Authorization from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. However, there are limited data describing their performance, in particular the performance of high-throughput SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR systems. We analyzed the diagnostic performance of two high-throughput systems: cobas 6800 and Panther Fusion, and their associated RT-PCR assays, with a collection of 389 nasopharyngeal specimens. The overall agreement between the platforms was 96.4% (375/389). Cohen's kappa analysis rated the strength of agreement between the two platforms as "almost perfect" (κ = 0.922; standard error, 0.051). Furthermore, there was no significant difference between corresponding cycle threshold values generated on the two systems (
value = 0.88; Student's
test). Taken together, these data imply that the two platforms can be considered comparable in terms of their clinical performance. We believe that this information will be useful for those who have already adopted these platforms or are seeking to implement high-throughput RT-PCR testing to stem the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.</description><subject>Betacoronavirus - genetics</subject><subject>Betacoronavirus - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Coronavirus Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Coronavirus Infections - virology</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>High-Throughput Screening Assays</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Nasopharynx - virology</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Pneumonia, Viral - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pneumonia, Viral - virology</subject><subject>Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><subject>Special Issue</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Virology</subject><issn>0095-1137</issn><issn>1098-660X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkUFv1DAQhS0EotuFG2fkIwdSbE-cOBekKlAKKgK1i8TN8nrHG6NNnNrOov0H_GyytFRwGmnmvW9m9Ah5wdkZ50K9-dR-PmNMNawQ7BFZcNaooqrY98dkwVgjC86hPiGnKf1gjJellE_JCQhQvCphQX61oR9N9CkMNDi6-hnopd92xaqLYdp245TpNe4xJqSraIZkox-zD0Pxtb2mN4eUsU_UhUhzh_QdZrTH6RF1c7QhPbdTxpmRRh9NDvEwu4ZNDD3SNsQwmL2PU6LiGXnizC7h8_u6JN8u3q_ay-Lqy4eP7flVYUGVuVASa1eZygkGCmpeboQoubQcmrVT3DgHTe3mlhNQr42yIISonQGwsGG1hCV5e8cdp3WPG4tDjmanx-h7Ew86GK__nwy-09uw1_W8T0o-A17dA2K4nTBl3ftkcbczA4YpaVEyJkFVVTNLX99JbQwpRXQPazjTx_D0HJ7-E56e_1mSl_-e9iD-mxb8Bo4Bl2o</recordid><startdate>20200723</startdate><enddate>20200723</enddate><creator>Craney, Arryn R</creator><creator>Velu, Priya D</creator><creator>Satlin, Michael J</creator><creator>Fauntleroy, Kathy A</creator><creator>Callan, Katrina</creator><creator>Robertson, Amy</creator><creator>La Spina, Marisa</creator><creator>Lei, Beryl</creator><creator>Chen, Anqi</creator><creator>Alston, Tricia</creator><creator>Rozman, Anna</creator><creator>Loda, Massimo</creator><creator>Rennert, Hanna</creator><creator>Cushing, Melissa</creator><creator>Westblade, Lars F</creator><general>American Society for Microbiology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200723</creationdate><title>Comparison of Two High-Throughput Reverse Transcription-PCR Systems for the Detection of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2</title><author>Craney, Arryn R ; Velu, Priya D ; Satlin, Michael J ; Fauntleroy, Kathy A ; Callan, Katrina ; Robertson, Amy ; La Spina, Marisa ; Lei, Beryl ; Chen, Anqi ; Alston, Tricia ; Rozman, Anna ; Loda, Massimo ; Rennert, Hanna ; Cushing, Melissa ; Westblade, Lars F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-85e7f6a6f20383714d22415c139bf81aff397f241f237ba8c32227fa33c3d0753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Betacoronavirus - genetics</topic><topic>Betacoronavirus - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Coronavirus Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Coronavirus Infections - virology</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>High-Throughput Screening Assays</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Nasopharynx - virology</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Pneumonia, Viral - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pneumonia, Viral - virology</topic><topic>Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><topic>Special Issue</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Virology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Craney, Arryn R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Velu, Priya D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Satlin, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fauntleroy, Kathy A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Callan, Katrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>La Spina, Marisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lei, Beryl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Anqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alston, Tricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rozman, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loda, Massimo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rennert, Hanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cushing, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westblade, Lars F</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Craney, Arryn R</au><au>Velu, Priya D</au><au>Satlin, Michael J</au><au>Fauntleroy, Kathy A</au><au>Callan, Katrina</au><au>Robertson, Amy</au><au>La Spina, Marisa</au><au>Lei, Beryl</au><au>Chen, Anqi</au><au>Alston, Tricia</au><au>Rozman, Anna</au><au>Loda, Massimo</au><au>Rennert, Hanna</au><au>Cushing, Melissa</au><au>Westblade, Lars F</au><au>McAdam, Alexander J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Two High-Throughput Reverse Transcription-PCR Systems for the Detection of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><date>2020-07-23</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>8</issue><issn>0095-1137</issn><eissn>1098-660X</eissn><abstract>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has emerged as the cause of a worldwide pandemic. Many commercial SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assays have received Emergency Use Authorization from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. However, there are limited data describing their performance, in particular the performance of high-throughput SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR systems. We analyzed the diagnostic performance of two high-throughput systems: cobas 6800 and Panther Fusion, and their associated RT-PCR assays, with a collection of 389 nasopharyngeal specimens. The overall agreement between the platforms was 96.4% (375/389). Cohen's kappa analysis rated the strength of agreement between the two platforms as "almost perfect" (κ = 0.922; standard error, 0.051). Furthermore, there was no significant difference between corresponding cycle threshold values generated on the two systems (
value = 0.88; Student's
test). Taken together, these data imply that the two platforms can be considered comparable in terms of their clinical performance. We believe that this information will be useful for those who have already adopted these platforms or are seeking to implement high-throughput RT-PCR testing to stem the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society for Microbiology</pub><pmid>32381643</pmid><doi>10.1128/JCM.00890-20</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0095-1137 |
ispartof | Journal of clinical microbiology, 2020-07, Vol.58 (8) |
issn | 0095-1137 1098-660X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7383551 |
source | American Society for Microbiology; MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Betacoronavirus - genetics Betacoronavirus - isolation & purification Coronavirus Infections - diagnosis Coronavirus Infections - virology COVID-19 High-Throughput Screening Assays Humans Nasopharynx - virology Pandemics Pneumonia, Viral - diagnosis Pneumonia, Viral - virology Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods SARS-CoV-2 Special Issue United States Virology |
title | Comparison of Two High-Throughput Reverse Transcription-PCR Systems for the Detection of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T01%3A03%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Two%20High-Throughput%20Reverse%20Transcription-PCR%20Systems%20for%20the%20Detection%20of%20Severe%20Acute%20Respiratory%20Syndrome%20Coronavirus%202&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20microbiology&rft.au=Craney,%20Arryn%20R&rft.date=2020-07-23&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=8&rft.issn=0095-1137&rft.eissn=1098-660X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1128/JCM.00890-20&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2400538669%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2400538669&rft_id=info:pmid/32381643&rfr_iscdi=true |