Evaluation of the QIAstat-Dx Respiratory SARS-CoV-2 Panel, the First Rapid Multiplex PCR Commercial Assay for SARS-CoV-2 Detection
In the race to contain severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), efficient detection and triage of infected patients must rely on rapid and reliable testing. In this work, we performed the first evaluation of the QIAstat-Dx respiratory SARS-CoV-2 panel (QIAstat-SARS) for SARS-CoV...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical microbiology 2020-07, Vol.58 (8) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of clinical microbiology |
container_volume | 58 |
creator | Visseaux, Benoit Le Hingrat, Quentin Collin, Gilles Bouzid, Donia Lebourgeois, Samuel Le Pluart, Diane Deconinck, Laurène Lescure, François-Xavier Lucet, Jean-Christophe Bouadma, Lila Timsit, Jean-François Descamps, Diane Yazdanpanah, Yazdan Casalino, Enrique Houhou-Fidouh, Nadhira |
description | In the race to contain severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), efficient detection and triage of infected patients must rely on rapid and reliable testing. In this work, we performed the first evaluation of the QIAstat-Dx respiratory SARS-CoV-2 panel (QIAstat-SARS) for SARS-CoV-2 detection. This assay is the first rapid multiplex PCR (mPCR) assay, including SARS-CoV-2 detection, and is fully compatible with a non-PCR-trained laboratory or point-of-care (PoC) testing. This evaluation was performed using 69 primary clinical samples (66 nasopharyngeal swabs [NPS], 1 bronchoalveolar lavage fluid sample [BAL], 1 tracheal aspirate sample, and 1 bronchial aspirate sample) comparing SARS-CoV-2 detection with the currently WHO-recommended reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) (WHO-RT-PCR) workflow. Additionally, a comparative limit of detection (LoD) assessment was performed for QIAstat-SARS and WHO-RT-PCR using a quantified clinical sample. Compatibility of sample pretreatment for viral neutralization or viscous samples with the QIAstat-SARS system were also tested. The QIAstat-Dx respiratory SARS-CoV-2 panel demonstrated a sensitivity comparable to that of the WHO-recommended assay with a limit of detection at 1,000 copies/ml. The overall percent agreement between QIAstat-Dx SARS and WHO-RT-PCR on 69 clinical samples was 97% with a sensitivity of 100% (40/40) and specificity at 93% (27/29). No cross-reaction was encountered for any other respiratory viruses or bacteria included in the panel. The QIAstat-SARS rapid multiplex PCR panel provides a highly sensitive, robust, and accurate assay for rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2. This assay allows rapid decisions even in non-PCR-trained laboratory or point-of-care testing, allowing innovative organization. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1128/JCM.00630-20 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7383528</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2395619550</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3650-919bd0fa917f0eb2532935a8d2457e3902a45db361ed2ad8b05ac4ff4b5ba6713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkUFv1DAQRi0Eokvhxhn5yKEuYztO4gvSKm2hqBVlC4ibNUkcauSsg-1U3Su_nN22VOU0h3l632g-Ql5zOORc1O8-NeeHAKUEJuAJWXDQNStL-PGULAC0YpzLao-8SOkXAC8KpZ6TPSlkwXkhFuTP8TX6GbMLaxoGmq8s_XK6TBkzO7qhK5smFzGHuKGXy9Ula8J3JugFrq0_uIVPXEyZrnByPT2ffXaTtzf0olnRJoyjjZ1DT5cp4YYOIT6WHNlsu13uS_JsQJ_sq_u5T76dHH9tPrKzzx9Om-UZ62SpgGmu2x4G1LwawLZCSaGlwroXhaqs1CCwUH0rS257gX3dgsKuGIaiVS2WFZf75P2dd5rb0fadXeeI3kzRjRg3JqAz_2_W7sr8DNemkrVUot4K3t4LYvg925TN6FJnvd--I8zJCKlVybVSsEUP7tAuhpSiHR5iOJhdbWZbm7mtzYgd_ubxaQ_wv57kXx-QkjI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2395619550</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of the QIAstat-Dx Respiratory SARS-CoV-2 Panel, the First Rapid Multiplex PCR Commercial Assay for SARS-CoV-2 Detection</title><source>American Society for Microbiology</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Visseaux, Benoit ; Le Hingrat, Quentin ; Collin, Gilles ; Bouzid, Donia ; Lebourgeois, Samuel ; Le Pluart, Diane ; Deconinck, Laurène ; Lescure, François-Xavier ; Lucet, Jean-Christophe ; Bouadma, Lila ; Timsit, Jean-François ; Descamps, Diane ; Yazdanpanah, Yazdan ; Casalino, Enrique ; Houhou-Fidouh, Nadhira</creator><contributor>McAdam, Alexander J.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Visseaux, Benoit ; Le Hingrat, Quentin ; Collin, Gilles ; Bouzid, Donia ; Lebourgeois, Samuel ; Le Pluart, Diane ; Deconinck, Laurène ; Lescure, François-Xavier ; Lucet, Jean-Christophe ; Bouadma, Lila ; Timsit, Jean-François ; Descamps, Diane ; Yazdanpanah, Yazdan ; Casalino, Enrique ; Houhou-Fidouh, Nadhira ; Emergency Department Influenza Study Group ; McAdam, Alexander J.</creatorcontrib><description>In the race to contain severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), efficient detection and triage of infected patients must rely on rapid and reliable testing. In this work, we performed the first evaluation of the QIAstat-Dx respiratory SARS-CoV-2 panel (QIAstat-SARS) for SARS-CoV-2 detection. This assay is the first rapid multiplex PCR (mPCR) assay, including SARS-CoV-2 detection, and is fully compatible with a non-PCR-trained laboratory or point-of-care (PoC) testing. This evaluation was performed using 69 primary clinical samples (66 nasopharyngeal swabs [NPS], 1 bronchoalveolar lavage fluid sample [BAL], 1 tracheal aspirate sample, and 1 bronchial aspirate sample) comparing SARS-CoV-2 detection with the currently WHO-recommended reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) (WHO-RT-PCR) workflow. Additionally, a comparative limit of detection (LoD) assessment was performed for QIAstat-SARS and WHO-RT-PCR using a quantified clinical sample. Compatibility of sample pretreatment for viral neutralization or viscous samples with the QIAstat-SARS system were also tested. The QIAstat-Dx respiratory SARS-CoV-2 panel demonstrated a sensitivity comparable to that of the WHO-recommended assay with a limit of detection at 1,000 copies/ml. The overall percent agreement between QIAstat-Dx SARS and WHO-RT-PCR on 69 clinical samples was 97% with a sensitivity of 100% (40/40) and specificity at 93% (27/29). No cross-reaction was encountered for any other respiratory viruses or bacteria included in the panel. The QIAstat-SARS rapid multiplex PCR panel provides a highly sensitive, robust, and accurate assay for rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2. This assay allows rapid decisions even in non-PCR-trained laboratory or point-of-care testing, allowing innovative organization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0095-1137</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-660X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00630-20</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32341142</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society for Microbiology</publisher><subject>Betacoronavirus - genetics ; Betacoronavirus - isolation & purification ; Clinical Laboratory Techniques - methods ; Coronavirus Infections - diagnosis ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 Testing ; Humans ; Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods ; Pandemics ; Pneumonia, Viral - diagnosis ; Respiratory System - virology ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Special Issue ; Time Factors ; Virology</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical microbiology, 2020-07, Vol.58 (8)</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2020 Visseaux et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Visseaux et al. 2020 Visseaux et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3650-919bd0fa917f0eb2532935a8d2457e3902a45db361ed2ad8b05ac4ff4b5ba6713</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3650-919bd0fa917f0eb2532935a8d2457e3902a45db361ed2ad8b05ac4ff4b5ba6713</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9279-5538 ; 0000-0001-9017-4941</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7383528/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7383528/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,3175,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32341142$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>McAdam, Alexander J.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Visseaux, Benoit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Hingrat, Quentin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collin, Gilles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouzid, Donia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lebourgeois, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Pluart, Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deconinck, Laurène</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lescure, François-Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucet, Jean-Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouadma, Lila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timsit, Jean-François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Descamps, Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yazdanpanah, Yazdan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casalino, Enrique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houhou-Fidouh, Nadhira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emergency Department Influenza Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the QIAstat-Dx Respiratory SARS-CoV-2 Panel, the First Rapid Multiplex PCR Commercial Assay for SARS-CoV-2 Detection</title><title>Journal of clinical microbiology</title><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><description>In the race to contain severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), efficient detection and triage of infected patients must rely on rapid and reliable testing. In this work, we performed the first evaluation of the QIAstat-Dx respiratory SARS-CoV-2 panel (QIAstat-SARS) for SARS-CoV-2 detection. This assay is the first rapid multiplex PCR (mPCR) assay, including SARS-CoV-2 detection, and is fully compatible with a non-PCR-trained laboratory or point-of-care (PoC) testing. This evaluation was performed using 69 primary clinical samples (66 nasopharyngeal swabs [NPS], 1 bronchoalveolar lavage fluid sample [BAL], 1 tracheal aspirate sample, and 1 bronchial aspirate sample) comparing SARS-CoV-2 detection with the currently WHO-recommended reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) (WHO-RT-PCR) workflow. Additionally, a comparative limit of detection (LoD) assessment was performed for QIAstat-SARS and WHO-RT-PCR using a quantified clinical sample. Compatibility of sample pretreatment for viral neutralization or viscous samples with the QIAstat-SARS system were also tested. The QIAstat-Dx respiratory SARS-CoV-2 panel demonstrated a sensitivity comparable to that of the WHO-recommended assay with a limit of detection at 1,000 copies/ml. The overall percent agreement between QIAstat-Dx SARS and WHO-RT-PCR on 69 clinical samples was 97% with a sensitivity of 100% (40/40) and specificity at 93% (27/29). No cross-reaction was encountered for any other respiratory viruses or bacteria included in the panel. The QIAstat-SARS rapid multiplex PCR panel provides a highly sensitive, robust, and accurate assay for rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2. This assay allows rapid decisions even in non-PCR-trained laboratory or point-of-care testing, allowing innovative organization.</description><subject>Betacoronavirus - genetics</subject><subject>Betacoronavirus - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Clinical Laboratory Techniques - methods</subject><subject>Coronavirus Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 Testing</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Pneumonia, Viral - diagnosis</subject><subject>Respiratory System - virology</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Special Issue</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Virology</subject><issn>0095-1137</issn><issn>1098-660X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkUFv1DAQRi0Eokvhxhn5yKEuYztO4gvSKm2hqBVlC4ibNUkcauSsg-1U3Su_nN22VOU0h3l632g-Ql5zOORc1O8-NeeHAKUEJuAJWXDQNStL-PGULAC0YpzLao-8SOkXAC8KpZ6TPSlkwXkhFuTP8TX6GbMLaxoGmq8s_XK6TBkzO7qhK5smFzGHuKGXy9Ula8J3JugFrq0_uIVPXEyZrnByPT2ffXaTtzf0olnRJoyjjZ1DT5cp4YYOIT6WHNlsu13uS_JsQJ_sq_u5T76dHH9tPrKzzx9Om-UZ62SpgGmu2x4G1LwawLZCSaGlwroXhaqs1CCwUH0rS257gX3dgsKuGIaiVS2WFZf75P2dd5rb0fadXeeI3kzRjRg3JqAz_2_W7sr8DNemkrVUot4K3t4LYvg925TN6FJnvd--I8zJCKlVybVSsEUP7tAuhpSiHR5iOJhdbWZbm7mtzYgd_ubxaQ_wv57kXx-QkjI</recordid><startdate>20200723</startdate><enddate>20200723</enddate><creator>Visseaux, Benoit</creator><creator>Le Hingrat, Quentin</creator><creator>Collin, Gilles</creator><creator>Bouzid, Donia</creator><creator>Lebourgeois, Samuel</creator><creator>Le Pluart, Diane</creator><creator>Deconinck, Laurène</creator><creator>Lescure, François-Xavier</creator><creator>Lucet, Jean-Christophe</creator><creator>Bouadma, Lila</creator><creator>Timsit, Jean-François</creator><creator>Descamps, Diane</creator><creator>Yazdanpanah, Yazdan</creator><creator>Casalino, Enrique</creator><creator>Houhou-Fidouh, Nadhira</creator><general>American Society for Microbiology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9279-5538</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9017-4941</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200723</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the QIAstat-Dx Respiratory SARS-CoV-2 Panel, the First Rapid Multiplex PCR Commercial Assay for SARS-CoV-2 Detection</title><author>Visseaux, Benoit ; Le Hingrat, Quentin ; Collin, Gilles ; Bouzid, Donia ; Lebourgeois, Samuel ; Le Pluart, Diane ; Deconinck, Laurène ; Lescure, François-Xavier ; Lucet, Jean-Christophe ; Bouadma, Lila ; Timsit, Jean-François ; Descamps, Diane ; Yazdanpanah, Yazdan ; Casalino, Enrique ; Houhou-Fidouh, Nadhira</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3650-919bd0fa917f0eb2532935a8d2457e3902a45db361ed2ad8b05ac4ff4b5ba6713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Betacoronavirus - genetics</topic><topic>Betacoronavirus - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Clinical Laboratory Techniques - methods</topic><topic>Coronavirus Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 Testing</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Pneumonia, Viral - diagnosis</topic><topic>Respiratory System - virology</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Special Issue</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Virology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Visseaux, Benoit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Hingrat, Quentin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collin, Gilles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouzid, Donia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lebourgeois, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Pluart, Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deconinck, Laurène</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lescure, François-Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucet, Jean-Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouadma, Lila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timsit, Jean-François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Descamps, Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yazdanpanah, Yazdan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casalino, Enrique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houhou-Fidouh, Nadhira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emergency Department Influenza Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Visseaux, Benoit</au><au>Le Hingrat, Quentin</au><au>Collin, Gilles</au><au>Bouzid, Donia</au><au>Lebourgeois, Samuel</au><au>Le Pluart, Diane</au><au>Deconinck, Laurène</au><au>Lescure, François-Xavier</au><au>Lucet, Jean-Christophe</au><au>Bouadma, Lila</au><au>Timsit, Jean-François</au><au>Descamps, Diane</au><au>Yazdanpanah, Yazdan</au><au>Casalino, Enrique</au><au>Houhou-Fidouh, Nadhira</au><au>McAdam, Alexander J.</au><aucorp>Emergency Department Influenza Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of the QIAstat-Dx Respiratory SARS-CoV-2 Panel, the First Rapid Multiplex PCR Commercial Assay for SARS-CoV-2 Detection</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><date>2020-07-23</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>8</issue><issn>0095-1137</issn><eissn>1098-660X</eissn><abstract>In the race to contain severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), efficient detection and triage of infected patients must rely on rapid and reliable testing. In this work, we performed the first evaluation of the QIAstat-Dx respiratory SARS-CoV-2 panel (QIAstat-SARS) for SARS-CoV-2 detection. This assay is the first rapid multiplex PCR (mPCR) assay, including SARS-CoV-2 detection, and is fully compatible with a non-PCR-trained laboratory or point-of-care (PoC) testing. This evaluation was performed using 69 primary clinical samples (66 nasopharyngeal swabs [NPS], 1 bronchoalveolar lavage fluid sample [BAL], 1 tracheal aspirate sample, and 1 bronchial aspirate sample) comparing SARS-CoV-2 detection with the currently WHO-recommended reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) (WHO-RT-PCR) workflow. Additionally, a comparative limit of detection (LoD) assessment was performed for QIAstat-SARS and WHO-RT-PCR using a quantified clinical sample. Compatibility of sample pretreatment for viral neutralization or viscous samples with the QIAstat-SARS system were also tested. The QIAstat-Dx respiratory SARS-CoV-2 panel demonstrated a sensitivity comparable to that of the WHO-recommended assay with a limit of detection at 1,000 copies/ml. The overall percent agreement between QIAstat-Dx SARS and WHO-RT-PCR on 69 clinical samples was 97% with a sensitivity of 100% (40/40) and specificity at 93% (27/29). No cross-reaction was encountered for any other respiratory viruses or bacteria included in the panel. The QIAstat-SARS rapid multiplex PCR panel provides a highly sensitive, robust, and accurate assay for rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2. This assay allows rapid decisions even in non-PCR-trained laboratory or point-of-care testing, allowing innovative organization.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society for Microbiology</pub><pmid>32341142</pmid><doi>10.1128/JCM.00630-20</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9279-5538</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9017-4941</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0095-1137 |
ispartof | Journal of clinical microbiology, 2020-07, Vol.58 (8) |
issn | 0095-1137 1098-660X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7383528 |
source | American Society for Microbiology; MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Betacoronavirus - genetics Betacoronavirus - isolation & purification Clinical Laboratory Techniques - methods Coronavirus Infections - diagnosis COVID-19 COVID-19 Testing Humans Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods Pandemics Pneumonia, Viral - diagnosis Respiratory System - virology SARS-CoV-2 Sensitivity and Specificity Special Issue Time Factors Virology |
title | Evaluation of the QIAstat-Dx Respiratory SARS-CoV-2 Panel, the First Rapid Multiplex PCR Commercial Assay for SARS-CoV-2 Detection |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T11%3A57%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20QIAstat-Dx%20Respiratory%20SARS-CoV-2%20Panel,%20the%20First%20Rapid%20Multiplex%20PCR%20Commercial%20Assay%20for%20SARS-CoV-2%20Detection&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20microbiology&rft.au=Visseaux,%20Benoit&rft.aucorp=Emergency%20Department%20Influenza%20Study%20Group&rft.date=2020-07-23&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=8&rft.issn=0095-1137&rft.eissn=1098-660X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1128/JCM.00630-20&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2395619550%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2395619550&rft_id=info:pmid/32341142&rfr_iscdi=true |