Quality and denoising in real‐time functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback: A methods review

Neurofeedback training using real‐time functional magnetic resonance imaging (rtfMRI‐NF) allows subjects voluntary control of localised and distributed brain activity. It has sparked increased interest as a promising non‐invasive treatment option in neuropsychiatric and neurocognitive disorders, alt...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Human brain mapping 2020-08, Vol.41 (12), p.3439-3467
Hauptverfasser: Heunis, Stephan, Lamerichs, Rolf, Zinger, Svitlana, Caballero‐Gaudes, Cesar, Jansen, Jacobus F. A., Aldenkamp, Bert, Breeuwer, Marcel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3467
container_issue 12
container_start_page 3439
container_title Human brain mapping
container_volume 41
creator Heunis, Stephan
Lamerichs, Rolf
Zinger, Svitlana
Caballero‐Gaudes, Cesar
Jansen, Jacobus F. A.
Aldenkamp, Bert
Breeuwer, Marcel
description Neurofeedback training using real‐time functional magnetic resonance imaging (rtfMRI‐NF) allows subjects voluntary control of localised and distributed brain activity. It has sparked increased interest as a promising non‐invasive treatment option in neuropsychiatric and neurocognitive disorders, although its efficacy and clinical significance are yet to be determined. In this work, we present the first extensive review of acquisition, processing and quality control methods available to improve the quality of the neurofeedback signal. Furthermore, we investigate the state of denoising and quality control practices in 128 recently published rtfMRI‐NF studies. We found: (a) that less than a third of the studies reported implementing standard real‐time fMRI denoising steps, (b) significant room for improvement with regards to methods reporting and (c) the need for methodological studies quantifying and comparing the contribution of denoising steps to the neurofeedback signal quality. Advances in rtfMRI‐NF research depend on reproducibility of methods and results. Notably, a systematic effort is needed to build up evidence that disentangles the various mechanisms influencing neurofeedback effects. To this end, we recommend that future rtfMRI‐NF studies: (a) report implementation of a set of standard real‐time fMRI denoising steps according to a proposed COBIDAS‐style checklist (https://osf.io/kjwhf/), (b) ensure the quality of the neurofeedback signal by calculating and reporting community‐informed quality metrics and applying offline control checks and (c) strive to adopt transparent principles in the form of methods and data sharing and support of open‐source rtfMRI‐NF software. Code and data for reproducibility, as well as an interactive environment to explore the study data, can be accessed at https://github.com/jsheunis/quality‐and‐denoising‐in‐rtfmri‐nf.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/hbm.25010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7375116</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A710602200</galeid><sourcerecordid>A710602200</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5100-183ce032d9a54c3a8c0d0fb7df9f85d40f8b94671dab204945b86dac95a7897d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1ks9u1DAQxiMEoqVw4AVQJC5wyNb_EscckJYKKFIRQoKz5djjXS-J3cZJq73xCDwjT8IsWwpFIB9szfzmG3v8FcVjShaUEHa87oYFqwkld4pDSpSsCFX87u7c1JUSkh4UD3LeEEIpUveLA8445w0Th8Xm42z6MG1LE13pIKaQQ1yVIZYjmP77129TGKD0c7RTSNH05WBWEaZgMZ8xEC2UAWO7ogjzmDyA64z98qJclgNM6-QyopcBrh4W97zpMzy63o-Kz29efzo5rc4-vH13sjyrbI2vqWjLLRDOnDK1sNy0ljjiO-m88m3tBPFtp0QjqTMdI0KJumsbZ6yqjWyVdPyoeLnXPZ-7AZyFOI2m1-cj3nPc6mSCvp2JYa1X6VJLLmtKGxR4di0wposZ8qSHkC30vYmQ5qwZV6JVDeMC0ad_oZs0jzgnpASrWxwy5b-plelBh-gT9rU7Ub2U-EmEMUKQWvyDwuVgCDZF8AHjtwqe7wvsmHIewd-8kRK9M4ZGY-ifxkD2yZ9DuSF_OQGB4z1whV22_1fSp6_e7yV_AJxawro</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2425836213</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quality and denoising in real‐time functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback: A methods review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>NCBI_PubMed Central(免费)</source><source>Wiley_OA刊</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Online service)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Heunis, Stephan ; Lamerichs, Rolf ; Zinger, Svitlana ; Caballero‐Gaudes, Cesar ; Jansen, Jacobus F. A. ; Aldenkamp, Bert ; Breeuwer, Marcel</creator><creatorcontrib>Heunis, Stephan ; Lamerichs, Rolf ; Zinger, Svitlana ; Caballero‐Gaudes, Cesar ; Jansen, Jacobus F. A. ; Aldenkamp, Bert ; Breeuwer, Marcel</creatorcontrib><description>Neurofeedback training using real‐time functional magnetic resonance imaging (rtfMRI‐NF) allows subjects voluntary control of localised and distributed brain activity. It has sparked increased interest as a promising non‐invasive treatment option in neuropsychiatric and neurocognitive disorders, although its efficacy and clinical significance are yet to be determined. In this work, we present the first extensive review of acquisition, processing and quality control methods available to improve the quality of the neurofeedback signal. Furthermore, we investigate the state of denoising and quality control practices in 128 recently published rtfMRI‐NF studies. We found: (a) that less than a third of the studies reported implementing standard real‐time fMRI denoising steps, (b) significant room for improvement with regards to methods reporting and (c) the need for methodological studies quantifying and comparing the contribution of denoising steps to the neurofeedback signal quality. Advances in rtfMRI‐NF research depend on reproducibility of methods and results. Notably, a systematic effort is needed to build up evidence that disentangles the various mechanisms influencing neurofeedback effects. To this end, we recommend that future rtfMRI‐NF studies: (a) report implementation of a set of standard real‐time fMRI denoising steps according to a proposed COBIDAS‐style checklist (https://osf.io/kjwhf/), (b) ensure the quality of the neurofeedback signal by calculating and reporting community‐informed quality metrics and applying offline control checks and (c) strive to adopt transparent principles in the form of methods and data sharing and support of open‐source rtfMRI‐NF software. Code and data for reproducibility, as well as an interactive environment to explore the study data, can be accessed at https://github.com/jsheunis/quality‐and‐denoising‐in‐rtfmri‐nf.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1065-9471</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0193</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32333624</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Biofeedback ; Biofeedback training ; Brain mapping ; Cognition ; Control methods ; Data retrieval ; denoising ; Electroencephalography ; Feedback ; fMRI ; Functional magnetic resonance imaging ; Functional Neuroimaging - methods ; Functional Neuroimaging - standards ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - standards ; Learning strategies ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - standards ; Mental disorders ; neurofeedback ; Neurofeedback - methods ; Neuroimaging ; Noise reduction ; quality ; Quality Control ; real‐time ; Reproducibility ; Resonance ; Review ; Signal quality ; Software</subject><ispartof>Human brain mapping, 2020-08, Vol.41 (12), p.3439-3467</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2020 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>2020. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5100-183ce032d9a54c3a8c0d0fb7df9f85d40f8b94671dab204945b86dac95a7897d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5100-183ce032d9a54c3a8c0d0fb7df9f85d40f8b94671dab204945b86dac95a7897d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3503-9872 ; 0000-0002-5271-8060</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7375116/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7375116/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,1417,11562,27924,27925,45574,45575,46052,46476,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32333624$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Heunis, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamerichs, Rolf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zinger, Svitlana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caballero‐Gaudes, Cesar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jansen, Jacobus F. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aldenkamp, Bert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breeuwer, Marcel</creatorcontrib><title>Quality and denoising in real‐time functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback: A methods review</title><title>Human brain mapping</title><addtitle>Hum Brain Mapp</addtitle><description>Neurofeedback training using real‐time functional magnetic resonance imaging (rtfMRI‐NF) allows subjects voluntary control of localised and distributed brain activity. It has sparked increased interest as a promising non‐invasive treatment option in neuropsychiatric and neurocognitive disorders, although its efficacy and clinical significance are yet to be determined. In this work, we present the first extensive review of acquisition, processing and quality control methods available to improve the quality of the neurofeedback signal. Furthermore, we investigate the state of denoising and quality control practices in 128 recently published rtfMRI‐NF studies. We found: (a) that less than a third of the studies reported implementing standard real‐time fMRI denoising steps, (b) significant room for improvement with regards to methods reporting and (c) the need for methodological studies quantifying and comparing the contribution of denoising steps to the neurofeedback signal quality. Advances in rtfMRI‐NF research depend on reproducibility of methods and results. Notably, a systematic effort is needed to build up evidence that disentangles the various mechanisms influencing neurofeedback effects. To this end, we recommend that future rtfMRI‐NF studies: (a) report implementation of a set of standard real‐time fMRI denoising steps according to a proposed COBIDAS‐style checklist (https://osf.io/kjwhf/), (b) ensure the quality of the neurofeedback signal by calculating and reporting community‐informed quality metrics and applying offline control checks and (c) strive to adopt transparent principles in the form of methods and data sharing and support of open‐source rtfMRI‐NF software. Code and data for reproducibility, as well as an interactive environment to explore the study data, can be accessed at https://github.com/jsheunis/quality‐and‐denoising‐in‐rtfmri‐nf.</description><subject>Biofeedback</subject><subject>Biofeedback training</subject><subject>Brain mapping</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Control methods</subject><subject>Data retrieval</subject><subject>denoising</subject><subject>Electroencephalography</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>fMRI</subject><subject>Functional magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Functional Neuroimaging - methods</subject><subject>Functional Neuroimaging - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - standards</subject><subject>Learning strategies</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - standards</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>neurofeedback</subject><subject>Neurofeedback - methods</subject><subject>Neuroimaging</subject><subject>Noise reduction</subject><subject>quality</subject><subject>Quality Control</subject><subject>real‐time</subject><subject>Reproducibility</subject><subject>Resonance</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Signal quality</subject><subject>Software</subject><issn>1065-9471</issn><issn>1097-0193</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1ks9u1DAQxiMEoqVw4AVQJC5wyNb_EscckJYKKFIRQoKz5djjXS-J3cZJq73xCDwjT8IsWwpFIB9szfzmG3v8FcVjShaUEHa87oYFqwkld4pDSpSsCFX87u7c1JUSkh4UD3LeEEIpUveLA8445w0Th8Xm42z6MG1LE13pIKaQQ1yVIZYjmP77129TGKD0c7RTSNH05WBWEaZgMZ8xEC2UAWO7ogjzmDyA64z98qJclgNM6-QyopcBrh4W97zpMzy63o-Kz29efzo5rc4-vH13sjyrbI2vqWjLLRDOnDK1sNy0ljjiO-m88m3tBPFtp0QjqTMdI0KJumsbZ6yqjWyVdPyoeLnXPZ-7AZyFOI2m1-cj3nPc6mSCvp2JYa1X6VJLLmtKGxR4di0wposZ8qSHkC30vYmQ5qwZV6JVDeMC0ad_oZs0jzgnpASrWxwy5b-plelBh-gT9rU7Ub2U-EmEMUKQWvyDwuVgCDZF8AHjtwqe7wvsmHIewd-8kRK9M4ZGY-ifxkD2yZ9DuSF_OQGB4z1whV22_1fSp6_e7yV_AJxawro</recordid><startdate>20200815</startdate><enddate>20200815</enddate><creator>Heunis, Stephan</creator><creator>Lamerichs, Rolf</creator><creator>Zinger, Svitlana</creator><creator>Caballero‐Gaudes, Cesar</creator><creator>Jansen, Jacobus F. A.</creator><creator>Aldenkamp, Bert</creator><creator>Breeuwer, Marcel</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3503-9872</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5271-8060</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200815</creationdate><title>Quality and denoising in real‐time functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback: A methods review</title><author>Heunis, Stephan ; Lamerichs, Rolf ; Zinger, Svitlana ; Caballero‐Gaudes, Cesar ; Jansen, Jacobus F. A. ; Aldenkamp, Bert ; Breeuwer, Marcel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5100-183ce032d9a54c3a8c0d0fb7df9f85d40f8b94671dab204945b86dac95a7897d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Biofeedback</topic><topic>Biofeedback training</topic><topic>Brain mapping</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Control methods</topic><topic>Data retrieval</topic><topic>denoising</topic><topic>Electroencephalography</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>fMRI</topic><topic>Functional magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Functional Neuroimaging - methods</topic><topic>Functional Neuroimaging - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - standards</topic><topic>Learning strategies</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - standards</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>neurofeedback</topic><topic>Neurofeedback - methods</topic><topic>Neuroimaging</topic><topic>Noise reduction</topic><topic>quality</topic><topic>Quality Control</topic><topic>real‐time</topic><topic>Reproducibility</topic><topic>Resonance</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Signal quality</topic><topic>Software</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Heunis, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamerichs, Rolf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zinger, Svitlana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caballero‐Gaudes, Cesar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jansen, Jacobus F. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aldenkamp, Bert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breeuwer, Marcel</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley_OA刊</collection><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Backfiles (Open access)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Human brain mapping</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Heunis, Stephan</au><au>Lamerichs, Rolf</au><au>Zinger, Svitlana</au><au>Caballero‐Gaudes, Cesar</au><au>Jansen, Jacobus F. A.</au><au>Aldenkamp, Bert</au><au>Breeuwer, Marcel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quality and denoising in real‐time functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback: A methods review</atitle><jtitle>Human brain mapping</jtitle><addtitle>Hum Brain Mapp</addtitle><date>2020-08-15</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>3439</spage><epage>3467</epage><pages>3439-3467</pages><issn>1065-9471</issn><eissn>1097-0193</eissn><abstract>Neurofeedback training using real‐time functional magnetic resonance imaging (rtfMRI‐NF) allows subjects voluntary control of localised and distributed brain activity. It has sparked increased interest as a promising non‐invasive treatment option in neuropsychiatric and neurocognitive disorders, although its efficacy and clinical significance are yet to be determined. In this work, we present the first extensive review of acquisition, processing and quality control methods available to improve the quality of the neurofeedback signal. Furthermore, we investigate the state of denoising and quality control practices in 128 recently published rtfMRI‐NF studies. We found: (a) that less than a third of the studies reported implementing standard real‐time fMRI denoising steps, (b) significant room for improvement with regards to methods reporting and (c) the need for methodological studies quantifying and comparing the contribution of denoising steps to the neurofeedback signal quality. Advances in rtfMRI‐NF research depend on reproducibility of methods and results. Notably, a systematic effort is needed to build up evidence that disentangles the various mechanisms influencing neurofeedback effects. To this end, we recommend that future rtfMRI‐NF studies: (a) report implementation of a set of standard real‐time fMRI denoising steps according to a proposed COBIDAS‐style checklist (https://osf.io/kjwhf/), (b) ensure the quality of the neurofeedback signal by calculating and reporting community‐informed quality metrics and applying offline control checks and (c) strive to adopt transparent principles in the form of methods and data sharing and support of open‐source rtfMRI‐NF software. Code and data for reproducibility, as well as an interactive environment to explore the study data, can be accessed at https://github.com/jsheunis/quality‐and‐denoising‐in‐rtfmri‐nf.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>32333624</pmid><doi>10.1002/hbm.25010</doi><tpages>29</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3503-9872</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5271-8060</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1065-9471
ispartof Human brain mapping, 2020-08, Vol.41 (12), p.3439-3467
issn 1065-9471
1097-0193
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7375116
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; NCBI_PubMed Central(免费); Wiley_OA刊; Wiley Online Library (Online service); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Biofeedback
Biofeedback training
Brain mapping
Cognition
Control methods
Data retrieval
denoising
Electroencephalography
Feedback
fMRI
Functional magnetic resonance imaging
Functional Neuroimaging - methods
Functional Neuroimaging - standards
Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - standards
Learning strategies
Magnetic resonance imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - standards
Mental disorders
neurofeedback
Neurofeedback - methods
Neuroimaging
Noise reduction
quality
Quality Control
real‐time
Reproducibility
Resonance
Review
Signal quality
Software
title Quality and denoising in real‐time functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback: A methods review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T11%3A25%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quality%20and%20denoising%20in%20real%E2%80%90time%20functional%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging%20neurofeedback:%20A%20methods%20review&rft.jtitle=Human%20brain%20mapping&rft.au=Heunis,%20Stephan&rft.date=2020-08-15&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=3439&rft.epage=3467&rft.pages=3439-3467&rft.issn=1065-9471&rft.eissn=1097-0193&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hbm.25010&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA710602200%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2425836213&rft_id=info:pmid/32333624&rft_galeid=A710602200&rfr_iscdi=true