Stress Testing the Resuscitation Room: Latent Threats to Patient Safety Identified During Interprofessional In Situ Simulation in a Canadian Academic Emergency Department

Objectives Emergency department (ED) resuscitation is a complex, high‐stakes procedure where positive outcomes depend on effective interactions between the health care team, the patient, and the environment. Resuscitation teams work in dynamic environments and strive to ensure the timely delivery of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:AEM education and training 2020-07, Vol.4 (3), p.254-261
Hauptverfasser: Mastoras, George, Poulin, Cari, Norman, Larry, Weitzman, Brian, Pozgay, Anita, Frank, Jason R., Posner, Glenn, Runde, Daniel P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 261
container_issue 3
container_start_page 254
container_title AEM education and training
container_volume 4
creator Mastoras, George
Poulin, Cari
Norman, Larry
Weitzman, Brian
Pozgay, Anita
Frank, Jason R.
Posner, Glenn
Runde, Daniel P.
description Objectives Emergency department (ED) resuscitation is a complex, high‐stakes procedure where positive outcomes depend on effective interactions between the health care team, the patient, and the environment. Resuscitation teams work in dynamic environments and strive to ensure the timely delivery of necessary treatments, equipment, and skill sets when required. However, systemic failures in this environment cannot always be adequately anticipated, which exposes patients to opportunities for harm. Methods As part of a new interprofessional education and quality improvement initiative, this prospective, observational study sought to characterize latent safety threats (LSTs) identified during the delivery of in situ, simulated resuscitations in our ED. In situ simulation (ISS) sessions were delivered on a monthly basis in the EDs at each campus of a large tertiary care academic hospital system, during which a variety of scenarios were run with teams of ED health care professionals. LSTs were identified by simulation facilitators and participants during the case and debriefing and then grouped thematically for analysis. Results During the study period, 22 ISS sessions were delivered, involving 58 cases and reaching 383 ED health care professionals. 196 latent safety threats were identified through these sessions (mean = 3.4 LSTs per case) of which 110 were determined to be “actionable” at a system level. LSTs identified included system/environmental design flaws, equipment problems, failures in department processes, and knowledge/skill gaps. Corrective mechanisms were initiated in 85% of actionable cases. Conclusions Effective quality improvement and continuing education programs are essential to translate these findings into more resilient patient care. ISS, beyond its role as a training tool for developing intrinsic and crisis resource management skills, can be effectively used to identify system issues in the ED that could expose critically ill patients to harm.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/aet2.10422
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7369481</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>AET210422</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4202-4da8aaf1d9ab03a112c44b9ca5275a027715052603fd3c95530dbb2de6e10a0f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc-O0zAQxi0EYlfLXngA5DNSYezYTcMBqeoWqFQJtC3naGJPWqPEqWwH1FfiKXEJrJYLl_n7zW8OH2MvBbwRAPItUpK5UlI-YddSlXKmiwqePqqv2G2M3wBALJQWIJ-zq0KWoHSlr9nPXQoUI99TTM4feDoSv6c4RuMSJjd4fj8M_Tu-xUQ-8f0xEKbI08C_5PVltMOW0plvbG5c68jyuzFcUBufKJzC0GZ-BmGXJ3zn0phDP3YT3XmOfIUerUPPlwYt9c7wdU_hQN6c-R2dMKQ-w1-wZy12kW7_5Bv29cN6v_o0237-uFkttzOjJMiZsrhAbIWtsIEChZBGqaYyqGWpEWRZCg1azqFobWEqrQuwTSMtzUkAQlvcsPcT9zQ2PVmTXwfs6lNwPYZzPaCr_914d6wPw_e6LOaVWogMeD0BTBhiDNQ-3AqoL6bVF9Pq36Zl8avH3x6kfy3KAjEJfriOzv9B1cv1Xk7QX8Hipdg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stress Testing the Resuscitation Room: Latent Threats to Patient Safety Identified During Interprofessional In Situ Simulation in a Canadian Academic Emergency Department</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Mastoras, George ; Poulin, Cari ; Norman, Larry ; Weitzman, Brian ; Pozgay, Anita ; Frank, Jason R. ; Posner, Glenn ; Runde, Daniel P.</creator><contributor>Runde, Daniel P.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Mastoras, George ; Poulin, Cari ; Norman, Larry ; Weitzman, Brian ; Pozgay, Anita ; Frank, Jason R. ; Posner, Glenn ; Runde, Daniel P. ; Runde, Daniel P.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives Emergency department (ED) resuscitation is a complex, high‐stakes procedure where positive outcomes depend on effective interactions between the health care team, the patient, and the environment. Resuscitation teams work in dynamic environments and strive to ensure the timely delivery of necessary treatments, equipment, and skill sets when required. However, systemic failures in this environment cannot always be adequately anticipated, which exposes patients to opportunities for harm. Methods As part of a new interprofessional education and quality improvement initiative, this prospective, observational study sought to characterize latent safety threats (LSTs) identified during the delivery of in situ, simulated resuscitations in our ED. In situ simulation (ISS) sessions were delivered on a monthly basis in the EDs at each campus of a large tertiary care academic hospital system, during which a variety of scenarios were run with teams of ED health care professionals. LSTs were identified by simulation facilitators and participants during the case and debriefing and then grouped thematically for analysis. Results During the study period, 22 ISS sessions were delivered, involving 58 cases and reaching 383 ED health care professionals. 196 latent safety threats were identified through these sessions (mean = 3.4 LSTs per case) of which 110 were determined to be “actionable” at a system level. LSTs identified included system/environmental design flaws, equipment problems, failures in department processes, and knowledge/skill gaps. Corrective mechanisms were initiated in 85% of actionable cases. Conclusions Effective quality improvement and continuing education programs are essential to translate these findings into more resilient patient care. ISS, beyond its role as a training tool for developing intrinsic and crisis resource management skills, can be effectively used to identify system issues in the ED that could expose critically ill patients to harm.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2472-5390</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2472-5390</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/aet2.10422</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32704595</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley and Sons Inc</publisher><subject>Original Contribution ; Original Contributions</subject><ispartof>AEM education and training, 2020-07, Vol.4 (3), p.254-261</ispartof><rights>2019 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine</rights><rights>2019 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4202-4da8aaf1d9ab03a112c44b9ca5275a027715052603fd3c95530dbb2de6e10a0f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4202-4da8aaf1d9ab03a112c44b9ca5275a027715052603fd3c95530dbb2de6e10a0f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9363-7734</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7369481/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7369481/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32704595$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Runde, Daniel P.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Mastoras, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poulin, Cari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norman, Larry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weitzman, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pozgay, Anita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frank, Jason R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Posner, Glenn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Runde, Daniel P.</creatorcontrib><title>Stress Testing the Resuscitation Room: Latent Threats to Patient Safety Identified During Interprofessional In Situ Simulation in a Canadian Academic Emergency Department</title><title>AEM education and training</title><addtitle>AEM Educ Train</addtitle><description>Objectives Emergency department (ED) resuscitation is a complex, high‐stakes procedure where positive outcomes depend on effective interactions between the health care team, the patient, and the environment. Resuscitation teams work in dynamic environments and strive to ensure the timely delivery of necessary treatments, equipment, and skill sets when required. However, systemic failures in this environment cannot always be adequately anticipated, which exposes patients to opportunities for harm. Methods As part of a new interprofessional education and quality improvement initiative, this prospective, observational study sought to characterize latent safety threats (LSTs) identified during the delivery of in situ, simulated resuscitations in our ED. In situ simulation (ISS) sessions were delivered on a monthly basis in the EDs at each campus of a large tertiary care academic hospital system, during which a variety of scenarios were run with teams of ED health care professionals. LSTs were identified by simulation facilitators and participants during the case and debriefing and then grouped thematically for analysis. Results During the study period, 22 ISS sessions were delivered, involving 58 cases and reaching 383 ED health care professionals. 196 latent safety threats were identified through these sessions (mean = 3.4 LSTs per case) of which 110 were determined to be “actionable” at a system level. LSTs identified included system/environmental design flaws, equipment problems, failures in department processes, and knowledge/skill gaps. Corrective mechanisms were initiated in 85% of actionable cases. Conclusions Effective quality improvement and continuing education programs are essential to translate these findings into more resilient patient care. ISS, beyond its role as a training tool for developing intrinsic and crisis resource management skills, can be effectively used to identify system issues in the ED that could expose critically ill patients to harm.</description><subject>Original Contribution</subject><subject>Original Contributions</subject><issn>2472-5390</issn><issn>2472-5390</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc-O0zAQxi0EYlfLXngA5DNSYezYTcMBqeoWqFQJtC3naGJPWqPEqWwH1FfiKXEJrJYLl_n7zW8OH2MvBbwRAPItUpK5UlI-YddSlXKmiwqePqqv2G2M3wBALJQWIJ-zq0KWoHSlr9nPXQoUI99TTM4feDoSv6c4RuMSJjd4fj8M_Tu-xUQ-8f0xEKbI08C_5PVltMOW0plvbG5c68jyuzFcUBufKJzC0GZ-BmGXJ3zn0phDP3YT3XmOfIUerUPPlwYt9c7wdU_hQN6c-R2dMKQ-w1-wZy12kW7_5Bv29cN6v_o0237-uFkttzOjJMiZsrhAbIWtsIEChZBGqaYyqGWpEWRZCg1azqFobWEqrQuwTSMtzUkAQlvcsPcT9zQ2PVmTXwfs6lNwPYZzPaCr_914d6wPw_e6LOaVWogMeD0BTBhiDNQ-3AqoL6bVF9Pq36Zl8avH3x6kfy3KAjEJfriOzv9B1cv1Xk7QX8Hipdg</recordid><startdate>202007</startdate><enddate>202007</enddate><creator>Mastoras, George</creator><creator>Poulin, Cari</creator><creator>Norman, Larry</creator><creator>Weitzman, Brian</creator><creator>Pozgay, Anita</creator><creator>Frank, Jason R.</creator><creator>Posner, Glenn</creator><creator>Runde, Daniel P.</creator><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9363-7734</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202007</creationdate><title>Stress Testing the Resuscitation Room: Latent Threats to Patient Safety Identified During Interprofessional In Situ Simulation in a Canadian Academic Emergency Department</title><author>Mastoras, George ; Poulin, Cari ; Norman, Larry ; Weitzman, Brian ; Pozgay, Anita ; Frank, Jason R. ; Posner, Glenn ; Runde, Daniel P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4202-4da8aaf1d9ab03a112c44b9ca5275a027715052603fd3c95530dbb2de6e10a0f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Original Contribution</topic><topic>Original Contributions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mastoras, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poulin, Cari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norman, Larry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weitzman, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pozgay, Anita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frank, Jason R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Posner, Glenn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Runde, Daniel P.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>AEM education and training</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mastoras, George</au><au>Poulin, Cari</au><au>Norman, Larry</au><au>Weitzman, Brian</au><au>Pozgay, Anita</au><au>Frank, Jason R.</au><au>Posner, Glenn</au><au>Runde, Daniel P.</au><au>Runde, Daniel P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stress Testing the Resuscitation Room: Latent Threats to Patient Safety Identified During Interprofessional In Situ Simulation in a Canadian Academic Emergency Department</atitle><jtitle>AEM education and training</jtitle><addtitle>AEM Educ Train</addtitle><date>2020-07</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>254</spage><epage>261</epage><pages>254-261</pages><issn>2472-5390</issn><eissn>2472-5390</eissn><abstract>Objectives Emergency department (ED) resuscitation is a complex, high‐stakes procedure where positive outcomes depend on effective interactions between the health care team, the patient, and the environment. Resuscitation teams work in dynamic environments and strive to ensure the timely delivery of necessary treatments, equipment, and skill sets when required. However, systemic failures in this environment cannot always be adequately anticipated, which exposes patients to opportunities for harm. Methods As part of a new interprofessional education and quality improvement initiative, this prospective, observational study sought to characterize latent safety threats (LSTs) identified during the delivery of in situ, simulated resuscitations in our ED. In situ simulation (ISS) sessions were delivered on a monthly basis in the EDs at each campus of a large tertiary care academic hospital system, during which a variety of scenarios were run with teams of ED health care professionals. LSTs were identified by simulation facilitators and participants during the case and debriefing and then grouped thematically for analysis. Results During the study period, 22 ISS sessions were delivered, involving 58 cases and reaching 383 ED health care professionals. 196 latent safety threats were identified through these sessions (mean = 3.4 LSTs per case) of which 110 were determined to be “actionable” at a system level. LSTs identified included system/environmental design flaws, equipment problems, failures in department processes, and knowledge/skill gaps. Corrective mechanisms were initiated in 85% of actionable cases. Conclusions Effective quality improvement and continuing education programs are essential to translate these findings into more resilient patient care. ISS, beyond its role as a training tool for developing intrinsic and crisis resource management skills, can be effectively used to identify system issues in the ED that could expose critically ill patients to harm.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley and Sons Inc</pub><pmid>32704595</pmid><doi>10.1002/aet2.10422</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9363-7734</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2472-5390
ispartof AEM education and training, 2020-07, Vol.4 (3), p.254-261
issn 2472-5390
2472-5390
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7369481
source Access via Wiley Online Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Original Contribution
Original Contributions
title Stress Testing the Resuscitation Room: Latent Threats to Patient Safety Identified During Interprofessional In Situ Simulation in a Canadian Academic Emergency Department
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T20%3A17%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stress%20Testing%20the%20Resuscitation%20Room:%20Latent%20Threats%20to%20Patient%20Safety%20Identified%20During%20Interprofessional%20In%20Situ%20Simulation%20in%20a%20Canadian%20Academic%20Emergency%20Department&rft.jtitle=AEM%20education%20and%20training&rft.au=Mastoras,%20George&rft.date=2020-07&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=254&rft.epage=261&rft.pages=254-261&rft.issn=2472-5390&rft.eissn=2472-5390&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/aet2.10422&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_pubme%3EAET210422%3C/wiley_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/32704595&rfr_iscdi=true