Helical tomotherapy with a complete-directional-complete block technique effectively reduces cardiac and lung dose for left-sided breast cancer

To evaluate the feasibility and optimal restricted angle of the complete-directional-complete block (CDCB) technique in helical tomotherapy (HT) by including regional nodal irradiation (RNI) with the internal mammary node (IMN) in left-sided breast cancer. Ten left-sided breast cancer patients treat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of radiology 2020-04, Vol.93 (1108), p.20190792
Hauptverfasser: Yeh, Hsin-Pei, Huang, Yu-Chuen, Wang, Li-Ying, Shueng, Pei-Wei, Tien, Hui-Ju, Chang, Chiu-Han, Chou, San-Fang, Hsieh, Chen-Hsi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1108
container_start_page 20190792
container_title British journal of radiology
container_volume 93
creator Yeh, Hsin-Pei
Huang, Yu-Chuen
Wang, Li-Ying
Shueng, Pei-Wei
Tien, Hui-Ju
Chang, Chiu-Han
Chou, San-Fang
Hsieh, Chen-Hsi
description To evaluate the feasibility and optimal restricted angle of the complete-directional-complete block (CDCB) technique in helical tomotherapy (HT) by including regional nodal irradiation (RNI) with the internal mammary node (IMN) in left-sided breast cancer. Ten left-sided breast cancer patients treated with 50 Gy in 25 fractions were compared with five-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy (5F-IMRT) and six types of HT plans. In the HT plans, complete block (CB), organ-based directional block (OBDB) and CDCB with different restricted angles were used. The conformity index (CI) between the CDCB and 5F-IMRT groups was similar. Compared to CB, OBDB and 5F-IMRT, CDCB resulted in a decreased ipsilateral mean lung dose. The low-dose region (V ) of the ipsilateral lung in OBDB (84.0%) was the highest among all techniques ( < 0.001). The mean dose of the heart in CB was significantly reduced (by 11.5-22.4%) compared with other techniques. The V of the heart in CDCB (1.9%) was significantly lower than that of CB, OBDB and 5F-IMRT. Compared to the mean dose of the left anterior descending (LAD) artery of 5F-IMRT (27.0 Gy), CDCB , CDCB , CDCB , CDCB and OBDB reduced the mean dose effectively by 31.7%, 38.3%, 39.6%, 42.0 and 56.2%, respectively. Considering the parameters of the organs-at-risk (OARs), CDCB had higher expectative values than the other techniques ( = 0.01). HT with the CDCB technique is feasible for treating left-sided breast cancer patients. The CDCB techniques not only achieved similar planning target volume coverage, homogeneity and dose conformity but also allowed better sparing of the heart and bilateral lungs. For left-sided breast cancer patients whose RNI field includes the IMN, heart avoidance is an important issue. The CDCB technique achieved good PTV coverage, homogeneity and dose conformity and allowed better sparing of the mean dose of the lung, the LAD artery, and the heart and reduced the V of the heart.
doi_str_mv 10.1259/bjr.20190792
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7362916</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>31939310</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-29ea53fcbe73f5f397c0ceb1dcaffde35a70c760022adac92e72e3cb7c16b78c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc9OGzEQh60KVAL01nPlB2Cp_2Tj9aVShShUQuICErfV7HhMTJ11ajtBeYq-MonSoPY0mplvfnP4GPssxaVUrf06vORLJaQVxqoPbCLNtGu6TjwdsYkQwjRSde0JOy3lZde2VnxkJ1pabbUUE_bnlmJAiLymRapzyrDc8NdQ5xw4psUyUqXGhUxYQxohNochH2LCX7wSzsfwe0WcvN9Ba4obnsmtkApHyC4Achgdj6vxmbtUiPuUeSRfmxIcOT5kglK37IiUz9mxh1jo0996xh5_XD9c3TZ39zc_r77fNai7aW2UJWi1x4GM9q3X1qBAGqRD8N6RbsEINDMhlAIHaBUZRRoHg3I2mA71Gfu2z12uhgU5pLFmiP0yhwXkTZ8g9P9vxjDvn9O6N3qmrJxtAy72AZhTKZn8-60U_U5MvxXTH8Rs8S___nuHDyb0G_JOkBQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Helical tomotherapy with a complete-directional-complete block technique effectively reduces cardiac and lung dose for left-sided breast cancer</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Yeh, Hsin-Pei ; Huang, Yu-Chuen ; Wang, Li-Ying ; Shueng, Pei-Wei ; Tien, Hui-Ju ; Chang, Chiu-Han ; Chou, San-Fang ; Hsieh, Chen-Hsi</creator><creatorcontrib>Yeh, Hsin-Pei ; Huang, Yu-Chuen ; Wang, Li-Ying ; Shueng, Pei-Wei ; Tien, Hui-Ju ; Chang, Chiu-Han ; Chou, San-Fang ; Hsieh, Chen-Hsi</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the feasibility and optimal restricted angle of the complete-directional-complete block (CDCB) technique in helical tomotherapy (HT) by including regional nodal irradiation (RNI) with the internal mammary node (IMN) in left-sided breast cancer. Ten left-sided breast cancer patients treated with 50 Gy in 25 fractions were compared with five-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy (5F-IMRT) and six types of HT plans. In the HT plans, complete block (CB), organ-based directional block (OBDB) and CDCB with different restricted angles were used. The conformity index (CI) between the CDCB and 5F-IMRT groups was similar. Compared to CB, OBDB and 5F-IMRT, CDCB resulted in a decreased ipsilateral mean lung dose. The low-dose region (V ) of the ipsilateral lung in OBDB (84.0%) was the highest among all techniques ( &lt; 0.001). The mean dose of the heart in CB was significantly reduced (by 11.5-22.4%) compared with other techniques. The V of the heart in CDCB (1.9%) was significantly lower than that of CB, OBDB and 5F-IMRT. Compared to the mean dose of the left anterior descending (LAD) artery of 5F-IMRT (27.0 Gy), CDCB , CDCB , CDCB , CDCB and OBDB reduced the mean dose effectively by 31.7%, 38.3%, 39.6%, 42.0 and 56.2%, respectively. Considering the parameters of the organs-at-risk (OARs), CDCB had higher expectative values than the other techniques ( = 0.01). HT with the CDCB technique is feasible for treating left-sided breast cancer patients. The CDCB techniques not only achieved similar planning target volume coverage, homogeneity and dose conformity but also allowed better sparing of the heart and bilateral lungs. For left-sided breast cancer patients whose RNI field includes the IMN, heart avoidance is an important issue. The CDCB technique achieved good PTV coverage, homogeneity and dose conformity and allowed better sparing of the mean dose of the lung, the LAD artery, and the heart and reduced the V of the heart.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1285</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-880X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190792</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31939310</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The British Institute of Radiology</publisher><subject>Dose Fractionation, Radiation ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Heart - radiation effects ; Humans ; Lung - radiation effects ; Lymphatic Irradiation - methods ; Organs at Risk - diagnostic imaging ; Organs at Risk - radiation effects ; Radiation Injuries - prevention &amp; control ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods ; Unilateral Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Unilateral Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><ispartof>British journal of radiology, 2020-04, Vol.93 (1108), p.20190792</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology 2020 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-29ea53fcbe73f5f397c0ceb1dcaffde35a70c760022adac92e72e3cb7c16b78c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-29ea53fcbe73f5f397c0ceb1dcaffde35a70c760022adac92e72e3cb7c16b78c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31939310$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yeh, Hsin-Pei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Yu-Chuen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Li-Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shueng, Pei-Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tien, Hui-Ju</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Chiu-Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chou, San-Fang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsieh, Chen-Hsi</creatorcontrib><title>Helical tomotherapy with a complete-directional-complete block technique effectively reduces cardiac and lung dose for left-sided breast cancer</title><title>British journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Br J Radiol</addtitle><description>To evaluate the feasibility and optimal restricted angle of the complete-directional-complete block (CDCB) technique in helical tomotherapy (HT) by including regional nodal irradiation (RNI) with the internal mammary node (IMN) in left-sided breast cancer. Ten left-sided breast cancer patients treated with 50 Gy in 25 fractions were compared with five-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy (5F-IMRT) and six types of HT plans. In the HT plans, complete block (CB), organ-based directional block (OBDB) and CDCB with different restricted angles were used. The conformity index (CI) between the CDCB and 5F-IMRT groups was similar. Compared to CB, OBDB and 5F-IMRT, CDCB resulted in a decreased ipsilateral mean lung dose. The low-dose region (V ) of the ipsilateral lung in OBDB (84.0%) was the highest among all techniques ( &lt; 0.001). The mean dose of the heart in CB was significantly reduced (by 11.5-22.4%) compared with other techniques. The V of the heart in CDCB (1.9%) was significantly lower than that of CB, OBDB and 5F-IMRT. Compared to the mean dose of the left anterior descending (LAD) artery of 5F-IMRT (27.0 Gy), CDCB , CDCB , CDCB , CDCB and OBDB reduced the mean dose effectively by 31.7%, 38.3%, 39.6%, 42.0 and 56.2%, respectively. Considering the parameters of the organs-at-risk (OARs), CDCB had higher expectative values than the other techniques ( = 0.01). HT with the CDCB technique is feasible for treating left-sided breast cancer patients. The CDCB techniques not only achieved similar planning target volume coverage, homogeneity and dose conformity but also allowed better sparing of the heart and bilateral lungs. For left-sided breast cancer patients whose RNI field includes the IMN, heart avoidance is an important issue. The CDCB technique achieved good PTV coverage, homogeneity and dose conformity and allowed better sparing of the mean dose of the lung, the LAD artery, and the heart and reduced the V of the heart.</description><subject>Dose Fractionation, Radiation</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart - radiation effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lung - radiation effects</subject><subject>Lymphatic Irradiation - methods</subject><subject>Organs at Risk - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Organs at Risk - radiation effects</subject><subject>Radiation Injuries - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods</subject><subject>Unilateral Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Unilateral Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><issn>0007-1285</issn><issn>1748-880X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkc9OGzEQh60KVAL01nPlB2Cp_2Tj9aVShShUQuICErfV7HhMTJ11ajtBeYq-MonSoPY0mplvfnP4GPssxaVUrf06vORLJaQVxqoPbCLNtGu6TjwdsYkQwjRSde0JOy3lZde2VnxkJ1pabbUUE_bnlmJAiLymRapzyrDc8NdQ5xw4psUyUqXGhUxYQxohNochH2LCX7wSzsfwe0WcvN9Ba4obnsmtkApHyC4Achgdj6vxmbtUiPuUeSRfmxIcOT5kglK37IiUz9mxh1jo0996xh5_XD9c3TZ39zc_r77fNai7aW2UJWi1x4GM9q3X1qBAGqRD8N6RbsEINDMhlAIHaBUZRRoHg3I2mA71Gfu2z12uhgU5pLFmiP0yhwXkTZ8g9P9vxjDvn9O6N3qmrJxtAy72AZhTKZn8-60U_U5MvxXTH8Rs8S___nuHDyb0G_JOkBQ</recordid><startdate>20200401</startdate><enddate>20200401</enddate><creator>Yeh, Hsin-Pei</creator><creator>Huang, Yu-Chuen</creator><creator>Wang, Li-Ying</creator><creator>Shueng, Pei-Wei</creator><creator>Tien, Hui-Ju</creator><creator>Chang, Chiu-Han</creator><creator>Chou, San-Fang</creator><creator>Hsieh, Chen-Hsi</creator><general>The British Institute of Radiology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200401</creationdate><title>Helical tomotherapy with a complete-directional-complete block technique effectively reduces cardiac and lung dose for left-sided breast cancer</title><author>Yeh, Hsin-Pei ; Huang, Yu-Chuen ; Wang, Li-Ying ; Shueng, Pei-Wei ; Tien, Hui-Ju ; Chang, Chiu-Han ; Chou, San-Fang ; Hsieh, Chen-Hsi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-29ea53fcbe73f5f397c0ceb1dcaffde35a70c760022adac92e72e3cb7c16b78c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Dose Fractionation, Radiation</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart - radiation effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lung - radiation effects</topic><topic>Lymphatic Irradiation - methods</topic><topic>Organs at Risk - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Organs at Risk - radiation effects</topic><topic>Radiation Injuries - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods</topic><topic>Unilateral Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Unilateral Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yeh, Hsin-Pei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Yu-Chuen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Li-Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shueng, Pei-Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tien, Hui-Ju</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Chiu-Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chou, San-Fang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsieh, Chen-Hsi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yeh, Hsin-Pei</au><au>Huang, Yu-Chuen</au><au>Wang, Li-Ying</au><au>Shueng, Pei-Wei</au><au>Tien, Hui-Ju</au><au>Chang, Chiu-Han</au><au>Chou, San-Fang</au><au>Hsieh, Chen-Hsi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Helical tomotherapy with a complete-directional-complete block technique effectively reduces cardiac and lung dose for left-sided breast cancer</atitle><jtitle>British journal of radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Radiol</addtitle><date>2020-04-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>93</volume><issue>1108</issue><spage>20190792</spage><pages>20190792-</pages><issn>0007-1285</issn><eissn>1748-880X</eissn><abstract>To evaluate the feasibility and optimal restricted angle of the complete-directional-complete block (CDCB) technique in helical tomotherapy (HT) by including regional nodal irradiation (RNI) with the internal mammary node (IMN) in left-sided breast cancer. Ten left-sided breast cancer patients treated with 50 Gy in 25 fractions were compared with five-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy (5F-IMRT) and six types of HT plans. In the HT plans, complete block (CB), organ-based directional block (OBDB) and CDCB with different restricted angles were used. The conformity index (CI) between the CDCB and 5F-IMRT groups was similar. Compared to CB, OBDB and 5F-IMRT, CDCB resulted in a decreased ipsilateral mean lung dose. The low-dose region (V ) of the ipsilateral lung in OBDB (84.0%) was the highest among all techniques ( &lt; 0.001). The mean dose of the heart in CB was significantly reduced (by 11.5-22.4%) compared with other techniques. The V of the heart in CDCB (1.9%) was significantly lower than that of CB, OBDB and 5F-IMRT. Compared to the mean dose of the left anterior descending (LAD) artery of 5F-IMRT (27.0 Gy), CDCB , CDCB , CDCB , CDCB and OBDB reduced the mean dose effectively by 31.7%, 38.3%, 39.6%, 42.0 and 56.2%, respectively. Considering the parameters of the organs-at-risk (OARs), CDCB had higher expectative values than the other techniques ( = 0.01). HT with the CDCB technique is feasible for treating left-sided breast cancer patients. The CDCB techniques not only achieved similar planning target volume coverage, homogeneity and dose conformity but also allowed better sparing of the heart and bilateral lungs. For left-sided breast cancer patients whose RNI field includes the IMN, heart avoidance is an important issue. The CDCB technique achieved good PTV coverage, homogeneity and dose conformity and allowed better sparing of the mean dose of the lung, the LAD artery, and the heart and reduced the V of the heart.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The British Institute of Radiology</pub><pmid>31939310</pmid><doi>10.1259/bjr.20190792</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-1285
ispartof British journal of radiology, 2020-04, Vol.93 (1108), p.20190792
issn 0007-1285
1748-880X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7362916
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Dose Fractionation, Radiation
Feasibility Studies
Female
Heart - radiation effects
Humans
Lung - radiation effects
Lymphatic Irradiation - methods
Organs at Risk - diagnostic imaging
Organs at Risk - radiation effects
Radiation Injuries - prevention & control
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods
Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods
Unilateral Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Unilateral Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy
title Helical tomotherapy with a complete-directional-complete block technique effectively reduces cardiac and lung dose for left-sided breast cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T03%3A10%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Helical%20tomotherapy%20with%20a%20complete-directional-complete%20block%20technique%20effectively%20reduces%20cardiac%20and%20lung%20dose%20for%20left-sided%20breast%20cancer&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Yeh,%20Hsin-Pei&rft.date=2020-04-01&rft.volume=93&rft.issue=1108&rft.spage=20190792&rft.pages=20190792-&rft.issn=0007-1285&rft.eissn=1748-880X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1259/bjr.20190792&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E31939310%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/31939310&rfr_iscdi=true