Fixed or adjustable sling in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence: results from a large cohort study

Background: Fixed and adjustable male slings for the treatment of male urinary stress incontinence became increasingly popular during the last decade. Although fixed slings are recommended for the treatment of mild to moderate stress urinary incontinence, there is still a lack of evidence regarding...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Translational andrology and urology 2020-06, Vol.9 (3), p.1099-1107
Hauptverfasser: Huesch, Tanja, Kretschmer, Alexander, Obaje, Alice, Kirschner-Hermanns, Ruth, Anding, Ralf, Pottek, Tobias, Rose, Achim, Olianas, Roberto, Friedl, Alexander, Homberg, Roland, Pfitzenmaier, Jesco, Abdunnur, Rudi, Queissert, Fabian, Naumann, Carsten M., Schweiger, Josef, Wotzka, Carola, Nyarangi-Dix, Joanne, Hofmann, Torben, Ulm, Kurt, Huebner, Wilhelm, Bauer, Ricarda M., Haferkamp, Axel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1107
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1099
container_title Translational andrology and urology
container_volume 9
creator Huesch, Tanja
Kretschmer, Alexander
Obaje, Alice
Kirschner-Hermanns, Ruth
Anding, Ralf
Pottek, Tobias
Rose, Achim
Olianas, Roberto
Friedl, Alexander
Homberg, Roland
Pfitzenmaier, Jesco
Abdunnur, Rudi
Queissert, Fabian
Naumann, Carsten M.
Schweiger, Josef
Wotzka, Carola
Nyarangi-Dix, Joanne
Hofmann, Torben
Ulm, Kurt
Huebner, Wilhelm
Bauer, Ricarda M.
Haferkamp, Axel
description Background: Fixed and adjustable male slings for the treatment of male urinary stress incontinence became increasingly popular during the last decade. Although fixed slings are recommended for the treatment of mild to moderate stress urinary incontinence, there is still a lack of evidence regarding the precise indication for an adjustable male sling. Furthermore, there is still no evidence that one type of male sling is superior to another. However, both, adjustable and fixed slings, are commonly utilized in daily clinical practice. This current investigation aims to evaluate the differences between fixed and adjustable male slings regarding indications, complication rates and functional outcome in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence in current clinical practice. Methods: A total of 294 patients with a fixed and 176 patients with an adjustable male sling were evaluated in a multicenter single arm cohort trial. Data collection was performed retrospectively according the medical record. Functional outcome was prospectively analyzed by standardized, validated questionnaires. Descriptive statistics was performed to present patient characteristics, complication rates and functional outcome. A chi2-test for categorical and independent t -test for continuous variables was performed to identify heterogeneity between the groups and to correlate preoperative characteristics with the outcome. A P value
doi_str_mv 10.21037/tau-19-852
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7354336</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2424993083</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-a076be7985d56717ac2a289a93bc0c0a77d9a25358902970f6265251f3992f133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkb1vFDEQxS0EIlFIRY9cIqEN_lh_USChEwlIkWigtma93jtHu3Ziewn57_Fx4YCOypbfb2be-CH0kpILRglXbyusHTWdFuwJOmWM8a6Xhj493jU_Qeel3BBCKOO6l_Q5OuFMKskNP0V3l-GHH3HKGMabtVQYZo_LHOIWh4jrzuOaPdTFx4rThBfYy-2pFLzmECE_NM6lWEP00fl3uEnrXAueclow4Bny1mOXdinXVriODy_Qswnm4s8fzzP07fLj182n7vrL1efNh-vOcU1rB0TJwSujxSikogocA6YNGD444ggoNRpgggttCDOKTJJJwQSduDFsopyfofeHvrfrsPjRtQ0yzPY2h6W5tgmC_VeJYWe36btVXPScy9bg9WODnO5WX6pdQnF-niH6tBbLetYbw4nez3pzQF1OpWQ_HcdQYn_lZFtOlhrbcmr0q7-dHdnfqTRAH4B7P6SpuLD_2iPWkhS9ZlwKsg91EyrUkOImrbH-cfI_pfwnV9GwZA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2424993083</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fixed or adjustable sling in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence: results from a large cohort study</title><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Huesch, Tanja ; Kretschmer, Alexander ; Obaje, Alice ; Kirschner-Hermanns, Ruth ; Anding, Ralf ; Pottek, Tobias ; Rose, Achim ; Olianas, Roberto ; Friedl, Alexander ; Homberg, Roland ; Pfitzenmaier, Jesco ; Abdunnur, Rudi ; Queissert, Fabian ; Naumann, Carsten M. ; Schweiger, Josef ; Wotzka, Carola ; Nyarangi-Dix, Joanne ; Hofmann, Torben ; Ulm, Kurt ; Huebner, Wilhelm ; Bauer, Ricarda M. ; Haferkamp, Axel</creator><creatorcontrib>Huesch, Tanja ; Kretschmer, Alexander ; Obaje, Alice ; Kirschner-Hermanns, Ruth ; Anding, Ralf ; Pottek, Tobias ; Rose, Achim ; Olianas, Roberto ; Friedl, Alexander ; Homberg, Roland ; Pfitzenmaier, Jesco ; Abdunnur, Rudi ; Queissert, Fabian ; Naumann, Carsten M. ; Schweiger, Josef ; Wotzka, Carola ; Nyarangi-Dix, Joanne ; Hofmann, Torben ; Ulm, Kurt ; Huebner, Wilhelm ; Bauer, Ricarda M. ; Haferkamp, Axel ; Debates Male Incontinence DOMINO ; Debates On Male Incontinence (DOMINO)-Project</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Fixed and adjustable male slings for the treatment of male urinary stress incontinence became increasingly popular during the last decade. Although fixed slings are recommended for the treatment of mild to moderate stress urinary incontinence, there is still a lack of evidence regarding the precise indication for an adjustable male sling. Furthermore, there is still no evidence that one type of male sling is superior to another. However, both, adjustable and fixed slings, are commonly utilized in daily clinical practice. This current investigation aims to evaluate the differences between fixed and adjustable male slings regarding indications, complication rates and functional outcome in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence in current clinical practice. Methods: A total of 294 patients with a fixed and 176 patients with an adjustable male sling were evaluated in a multicenter single arm cohort trial. Data collection was performed retrospectively according the medical record. Functional outcome was prospectively analyzed by standardized, validated questionnaires. Descriptive statistics was performed to present patient characteristics, complication rates and functional outcome. A chi2-test for categorical and independent t -test for continuous variables was performed to identify heterogeneity between the groups and to correlate preoperative characteristics with the outcome. A P value &lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Patients with higher degree of urinary incontinence (P&lt;0.001) and risk factors such as history of pelvic irradiation (P&lt;0.001) or prior surgery for urethral stricture (P=0.032) were more likely to receive an adjustable MS. Complication rates were comparable except for infection (P=0.009, 0 vs. 2.3%) and pain (P=0.001, 1.7% vs. 11.3%) which occurred more frequently in adjustable slings. Functional outcome according validated questionnaires demonstrated no differences between fixed and adjustable male slings. Conclusions: Adjustable male slings are more frequently utilized in patients with higher degree of incontinence and risk factors compared to fixed slings. No differences could be identified between functional outcome which may imply an advantage for adjustability. However, pain and infection rates were significantly higher in adjustable MS and should be considered in the decision process for sling type.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2223-4683</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2223-4691</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2223-4691</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.21037/tau-19-852</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32676393</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>SHATIN: AME PUBLISHING COMPANY</publisher><subject>Andrology ; Endocrinology &amp; Metabolism ; Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine ; Original ; Science &amp; Technology ; Urology &amp; Nephrology</subject><ispartof>Translational andrology and urology, 2020-06, Vol.9 (3), p.1099-1107</ispartof><rights>2020 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2020 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved. 2020 Translational Andrology and Urology.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>8</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000548236500001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-a076be7985d56717ac2a289a93bc0c0a77d9a25358902970f6265251f3992f133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-a076be7985d56717ac2a289a93bc0c0a77d9a25358902970f6265251f3992f133</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6332-916X ; 0000-0002-7872-5496</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7354336/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7354336/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,729,782,786,887,27931,27932,28255,53798,53800</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32676393$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huesch, Tanja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kretschmer, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Obaje, Alice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirschner-Hermanns, Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anding, Ralf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pottek, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rose, Achim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olianas, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedl, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Homberg, Roland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfitzenmaier, Jesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdunnur, Rudi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Queissert, Fabian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naumann, Carsten M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schweiger, Josef</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wotzka, Carola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nyarangi-Dix, Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofmann, Torben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulm, Kurt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huebner, Wilhelm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Ricarda M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haferkamp, Axel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Debates Male Incontinence DOMINO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Debates On Male Incontinence (DOMINO)-Project</creatorcontrib><title>Fixed or adjustable sling in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence: results from a large cohort study</title><title>Translational andrology and urology</title><addtitle>TRANSL ANDROL UROL</addtitle><addtitle>Transl Androl Urol</addtitle><description>Background: Fixed and adjustable male slings for the treatment of male urinary stress incontinence became increasingly popular during the last decade. Although fixed slings are recommended for the treatment of mild to moderate stress urinary incontinence, there is still a lack of evidence regarding the precise indication for an adjustable male sling. Furthermore, there is still no evidence that one type of male sling is superior to another. However, both, adjustable and fixed slings, are commonly utilized in daily clinical practice. This current investigation aims to evaluate the differences between fixed and adjustable male slings regarding indications, complication rates and functional outcome in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence in current clinical practice. Methods: A total of 294 patients with a fixed and 176 patients with an adjustable male sling were evaluated in a multicenter single arm cohort trial. Data collection was performed retrospectively according the medical record. Functional outcome was prospectively analyzed by standardized, validated questionnaires. Descriptive statistics was performed to present patient characteristics, complication rates and functional outcome. A chi2-test for categorical and independent t -test for continuous variables was performed to identify heterogeneity between the groups and to correlate preoperative characteristics with the outcome. A P value &lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Patients with higher degree of urinary incontinence (P&lt;0.001) and risk factors such as history of pelvic irradiation (P&lt;0.001) or prior surgery for urethral stricture (P=0.032) were more likely to receive an adjustable MS. Complication rates were comparable except for infection (P=0.009, 0 vs. 2.3%) and pain (P=0.001, 1.7% vs. 11.3%) which occurred more frequently in adjustable slings. Functional outcome according validated questionnaires demonstrated no differences between fixed and adjustable male slings. Conclusions: Adjustable male slings are more frequently utilized in patients with higher degree of incontinence and risk factors compared to fixed slings. No differences could be identified between functional outcome which may imply an advantage for adjustability. However, pain and infection rates were significantly higher in adjustable MS and should be considered in the decision process for sling type.</description><subject>Andrology</subject><subject>Endocrinology &amp; Metabolism</subject><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Urology &amp; Nephrology</subject><issn>2223-4683</issn><issn>2223-4691</issn><issn>2223-4691</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AOWDO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkb1vFDEQxS0EIlFIRY9cIqEN_lh_USChEwlIkWigtma93jtHu3Ziewn57_Fx4YCOypbfb2be-CH0kpILRglXbyusHTWdFuwJOmWM8a6Xhj493jU_Qeel3BBCKOO6l_Q5OuFMKskNP0V3l-GHH3HKGMabtVQYZo_LHOIWh4jrzuOaPdTFx4rThBfYy-2pFLzmECE_NM6lWEP00fl3uEnrXAueclow4Bny1mOXdinXVriODy_Qswnm4s8fzzP07fLj182n7vrL1efNh-vOcU1rB0TJwSujxSikogocA6YNGD444ggoNRpgggttCDOKTJJJwQSduDFsopyfofeHvrfrsPjRtQ0yzPY2h6W5tgmC_VeJYWe36btVXPScy9bg9WODnO5WX6pdQnF-niH6tBbLetYbw4nez3pzQF1OpWQ_HcdQYn_lZFtOlhrbcmr0q7-dHdnfqTRAH4B7P6SpuLD_2iPWkhS9ZlwKsg91EyrUkOImrbH-cfI_pfwnV9GwZA</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>Huesch, Tanja</creator><creator>Kretschmer, Alexander</creator><creator>Obaje, Alice</creator><creator>Kirschner-Hermanns, Ruth</creator><creator>Anding, Ralf</creator><creator>Pottek, Tobias</creator><creator>Rose, Achim</creator><creator>Olianas, Roberto</creator><creator>Friedl, Alexander</creator><creator>Homberg, Roland</creator><creator>Pfitzenmaier, Jesco</creator><creator>Abdunnur, Rudi</creator><creator>Queissert, Fabian</creator><creator>Naumann, Carsten M.</creator><creator>Schweiger, Josef</creator><creator>Wotzka, Carola</creator><creator>Nyarangi-Dix, Joanne</creator><creator>Hofmann, Torben</creator><creator>Ulm, Kurt</creator><creator>Huebner, Wilhelm</creator><creator>Bauer, Ricarda M.</creator><creator>Haferkamp, Axel</creator><general>AME PUBLISHING COMPANY</general><general>AME Publishing Company</general><scope>AOWDO</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6332-916X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7872-5496</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>Fixed or adjustable sling in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence: results from a large cohort study</title><author>Huesch, Tanja ; Kretschmer, Alexander ; Obaje, Alice ; Kirschner-Hermanns, Ruth ; Anding, Ralf ; Pottek, Tobias ; Rose, Achim ; Olianas, Roberto ; Friedl, Alexander ; Homberg, Roland ; Pfitzenmaier, Jesco ; Abdunnur, Rudi ; Queissert, Fabian ; Naumann, Carsten M. ; Schweiger, Josef ; Wotzka, Carola ; Nyarangi-Dix, Joanne ; Hofmann, Torben ; Ulm, Kurt ; Huebner, Wilhelm ; Bauer, Ricarda M. ; Haferkamp, Axel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-a076be7985d56717ac2a289a93bc0c0a77d9a25358902970f6265251f3992f133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Andrology</topic><topic>Endocrinology &amp; Metabolism</topic><topic>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Urology &amp; Nephrology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huesch, Tanja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kretschmer, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Obaje, Alice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirschner-Hermanns, Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anding, Ralf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pottek, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rose, Achim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olianas, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedl, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Homberg, Roland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfitzenmaier, Jesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdunnur, Rudi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Queissert, Fabian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naumann, Carsten M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schweiger, Josef</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wotzka, Carola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nyarangi-Dix, Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofmann, Torben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulm, Kurt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huebner, Wilhelm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Ricarda M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haferkamp, Axel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Debates Male Incontinence DOMINO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Debates On Male Incontinence (DOMINO)-Project</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Translational andrology and urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huesch, Tanja</au><au>Kretschmer, Alexander</au><au>Obaje, Alice</au><au>Kirschner-Hermanns, Ruth</au><au>Anding, Ralf</au><au>Pottek, Tobias</au><au>Rose, Achim</au><au>Olianas, Roberto</au><au>Friedl, Alexander</au><au>Homberg, Roland</au><au>Pfitzenmaier, Jesco</au><au>Abdunnur, Rudi</au><au>Queissert, Fabian</au><au>Naumann, Carsten M.</au><au>Schweiger, Josef</au><au>Wotzka, Carola</au><au>Nyarangi-Dix, Joanne</au><au>Hofmann, Torben</au><au>Ulm, Kurt</au><au>Huebner, Wilhelm</au><au>Bauer, Ricarda M.</au><au>Haferkamp, Axel</au><aucorp>Debates Male Incontinence DOMINO</aucorp><aucorp>Debates On Male Incontinence (DOMINO)-Project</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fixed or adjustable sling in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence: results from a large cohort study</atitle><jtitle>Translational andrology and urology</jtitle><stitle>TRANSL ANDROL UROL</stitle><addtitle>Transl Androl Urol</addtitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1099</spage><epage>1107</epage><pages>1099-1107</pages><issn>2223-4683</issn><issn>2223-4691</issn><eissn>2223-4691</eissn><abstract>Background: Fixed and adjustable male slings for the treatment of male urinary stress incontinence became increasingly popular during the last decade. Although fixed slings are recommended for the treatment of mild to moderate stress urinary incontinence, there is still a lack of evidence regarding the precise indication for an adjustable male sling. Furthermore, there is still no evidence that one type of male sling is superior to another. However, both, adjustable and fixed slings, are commonly utilized in daily clinical practice. This current investigation aims to evaluate the differences between fixed and adjustable male slings regarding indications, complication rates and functional outcome in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence in current clinical practice. Methods: A total of 294 patients with a fixed and 176 patients with an adjustable male sling were evaluated in a multicenter single arm cohort trial. Data collection was performed retrospectively according the medical record. Functional outcome was prospectively analyzed by standardized, validated questionnaires. Descriptive statistics was performed to present patient characteristics, complication rates and functional outcome. A chi2-test for categorical and independent t -test for continuous variables was performed to identify heterogeneity between the groups and to correlate preoperative characteristics with the outcome. A P value &lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Patients with higher degree of urinary incontinence (P&lt;0.001) and risk factors such as history of pelvic irradiation (P&lt;0.001) or prior surgery for urethral stricture (P=0.032) were more likely to receive an adjustable MS. Complication rates were comparable except for infection (P=0.009, 0 vs. 2.3%) and pain (P=0.001, 1.7% vs. 11.3%) which occurred more frequently in adjustable slings. Functional outcome according validated questionnaires demonstrated no differences between fixed and adjustable male slings. Conclusions: Adjustable male slings are more frequently utilized in patients with higher degree of incontinence and risk factors compared to fixed slings. No differences could be identified between functional outcome which may imply an advantage for adjustability. However, pain and infection rates were significantly higher in adjustable MS and should be considered in the decision process for sling type.</abstract><cop>SHATIN</cop><pub>AME PUBLISHING COMPANY</pub><pmid>32676393</pmid><doi>10.21037/tau-19-852</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6332-916X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7872-5496</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2223-4683
ispartof Translational andrology and urology, 2020-06, Vol.9 (3), p.1099-1107
issn 2223-4683
2223-4691
2223-4691
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7354336
source Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Andrology
Endocrinology & Metabolism
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Original
Science & Technology
Urology & Nephrology
title Fixed or adjustable sling in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence: results from a large cohort study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-06T22%3A59%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fixed%20or%20adjustable%20sling%20in%20the%20treatment%20of%20male%20stress%20urinary%20incontinence:%20results%20from%20a%20large%20cohort%20study&rft.jtitle=Translational%20andrology%20and%20urology&rft.au=Huesch,%20Tanja&rft.aucorp=Debates%20Male%20Incontinence%20DOMINO&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1099&rft.epage=1107&rft.pages=1099-1107&rft.issn=2223-4683&rft.eissn=2223-4691&rft_id=info:doi/10.21037/tau-19-852&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2424993083%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2424993083&rft_id=info:pmid/32676393&rfr_iscdi=true