A systematic review of empirical and simulation studies evaluating the health impact of transportation interventions
Urban transportation is an important determinant of health and environmental outcomes, and therefore essential to achieving the United Nation's Sustainable Development Goals. To better understand the health impacts of transportation initiatives, we conducted a systematic review of longitudinal...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental research 2020-07, Vol.186, p.109519, Article 109519 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 109519 |
container_title | Environmental research |
container_volume | 186 |
creator | Stankov, Ivana Garcia, Leandro M.T. Mascolli, Maria Antonietta Montes, Felipe Meisel, José D. Gouveia, Nelson Sarmiento, Olga L. Rodriguez, Daniel A. Hammond, Ross A. Caiaffa, Waleska Teixeira Diez Roux, Ana V. |
description | Urban transportation is an important determinant of health and environmental outcomes, and therefore essential to achieving the United Nation's Sustainable Development Goals. To better understand the health impacts of transportation initiatives, we conducted a systematic review of longitudinal health evaluations involving: a) bus rapid transit (BRT); b) bicycle lanes; c) Open Streets programs; and d) aerial trams/cable cars. We also synthesized systems-based simulation studies of the health-related consequences of walking, bicycling, aerial tram, bus and BRT use.
Two reviewers screened 3302 unique titles and abstracts identified through a systematic search of MEDLINE (Ovid), Scopus, TRID and LILACS databases. We included 39 studies: 29 longitudinal evaluations and 10 simulation studies. Five studies focused on low- and middle-income contexts. Of the 29 evaluation studies, 19 focused on single component bicycle lane interventions; the rest evaluated multi-component interventions involving: bicycle lanes (n = 5), aerial trams (n = 1), and combined bicycle lane/BRT systems (n = 4). Bicycle lanes and BRT systems appeared effective at increasing bicycle and BRT mode share, active transport duration, and number of trips using these modes. Of the 10 simulation studies, there were 9 agent-based models and one system dynamics model. Five studies focused on bus/BRT expansions and incentives, three on interventions for active travel, and the rest investigated combinations of public transport and active travel policies. Synergistic effects were observed when multiple policies were implemented, with several studies showing that sizable interventions are required to significantly shift travel mode choices.
Our review indicates that bicycle lanes and BRT systems represent promising initiatives for promoting population health. There is also evidence to suggest that synergistic effects might be achieved through the combined implementation of multiple transportation policies. However, more rigorous evaluation and simulation studies focusing on low- and middle-income countries, aerial trams and Open Streets programs, and a more diverse set of health and health equity outcomes is required.
This figure represents a word network created by extracting keywords from the paper abstracts included in our systematic review. Each keyword represents a node in the network; its size is proportional to the number of abstracts in which it appears. Keywords are connected if they are found i |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109519 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7343239</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0013935120304126</els_id><sourcerecordid>32335428</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-51c1f0db523422d2734693bcbc0b4f19105cb26116063555fe6ad1e9510f61af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uc1OxCAYJEaj6-obGMMLdOWnoL2YmI1_iYkXPRNKv-6yaWkDbM2-vTTVVS-eYD6YGZhB6IKSBSVUXm0W4AYPYcEIG0eFoMUBmqWNzBLgh2hGCOVZwQU9QachbBKkgpNjdMIZ5yJnNzMU73DYhQitjtZgD4OFD9zVGNreemt0g7WrcLDttkk3OodD3FYWAoZBN9s0cisc14DXoJu4xrbttYmjQPTahb7zcaJZF8EP4EYQztBRrZsA51_rHL0_3L8tn7KX18fn5d1LZnLJYyaooTWpSsF4zljFrnkuC16a0pAyr2lBiTAlk5RKIrkQogapKwopCFJLqms-R7eTbr8tW6hMsve6Ub23rfY71Wmr_p44u1arblDJKUVUJIF8EjC-C8FDvedSosYW1EZNLaixBTW1kGiXv333pO_Yfx4G6fcpcq-CseAMVNaDiarq7P8On6ovntc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A systematic review of empirical and simulation studies evaluating the health impact of transportation interventions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Stankov, Ivana ; Garcia, Leandro M.T. ; Mascolli, Maria Antonietta ; Montes, Felipe ; Meisel, José D. ; Gouveia, Nelson ; Sarmiento, Olga L. ; Rodriguez, Daniel A. ; Hammond, Ross A. ; Caiaffa, Waleska Teixeira ; Diez Roux, Ana V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stankov, Ivana ; Garcia, Leandro M.T. ; Mascolli, Maria Antonietta ; Montes, Felipe ; Meisel, José D. ; Gouveia, Nelson ; Sarmiento, Olga L. ; Rodriguez, Daniel A. ; Hammond, Ross A. ; Caiaffa, Waleska Teixeira ; Diez Roux, Ana V.</creatorcontrib><description>Urban transportation is an important determinant of health and environmental outcomes, and therefore essential to achieving the United Nation's Sustainable Development Goals. To better understand the health impacts of transportation initiatives, we conducted a systematic review of longitudinal health evaluations involving: a) bus rapid transit (BRT); b) bicycle lanes; c) Open Streets programs; and d) aerial trams/cable cars. We also synthesized systems-based simulation studies of the health-related consequences of walking, bicycling, aerial tram, bus and BRT use.
Two reviewers screened 3302 unique titles and abstracts identified through a systematic search of MEDLINE (Ovid), Scopus, TRID and LILACS databases. We included 39 studies: 29 longitudinal evaluations and 10 simulation studies. Five studies focused on low- and middle-income contexts. Of the 29 evaluation studies, 19 focused on single component bicycle lane interventions; the rest evaluated multi-component interventions involving: bicycle lanes (n = 5), aerial trams (n = 1), and combined bicycle lane/BRT systems (n = 4). Bicycle lanes and BRT systems appeared effective at increasing bicycle and BRT mode share, active transport duration, and number of trips using these modes. Of the 10 simulation studies, there were 9 agent-based models and one system dynamics model. Five studies focused on bus/BRT expansions and incentives, three on interventions for active travel, and the rest investigated combinations of public transport and active travel policies. Synergistic effects were observed when multiple policies were implemented, with several studies showing that sizable interventions are required to significantly shift travel mode choices.
Our review indicates that bicycle lanes and BRT systems represent promising initiatives for promoting population health. There is also evidence to suggest that synergistic effects might be achieved through the combined implementation of multiple transportation policies. However, more rigorous evaluation and simulation studies focusing on low- and middle-income countries, aerial trams and Open Streets programs, and a more diverse set of health and health equity outcomes is required.
This figure represents a word network created by extracting keywords from the paper abstracts included in our systematic review. Each keyword represents a node in the network; its size is proportional to the number of abstracts in which it appears. Keywords are connected if they are found in the same abstract. The colours represent different communities of words as identified using the Louvain method. [Display omitted]
•Bike lanes and bus rapid transit systems promote physical activity and active travel.•Multi-component interventions can act synergistically to increase active travel.•Few longitudinal health evaluations of aerial trams and open streets programs exist.•Low-and-middle income countries are understudied in the literature.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-9351</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0953</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109519</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32335428</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Automobiles ; Bicycling ; Complex systems ; Health ; Motor Vehicles ; Natural experiment ; Systematic review ; Transportation ; Walking</subject><ispartof>Environmental research, 2020-07, Vol.186, p.109519, Article 109519</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2020 The Authors 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-51c1f0db523422d2734693bcbc0b4f19105cb26116063555fe6ad1e9510f61af3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-51c1f0db523422d2734693bcbc0b4f19105cb26116063555fe6ad1e9510f61af3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109519$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32335428$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stankov, Ivana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, Leandro M.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mascolli, Maria Antonietta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montes, Felipe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meisel, José D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gouveia, Nelson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarmiento, Olga L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez, Daniel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammond, Ross A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caiaffa, Waleska Teixeira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diez Roux, Ana V.</creatorcontrib><title>A systematic review of empirical and simulation studies evaluating the health impact of transportation interventions</title><title>Environmental research</title><addtitle>Environ Res</addtitle><description>Urban transportation is an important determinant of health and environmental outcomes, and therefore essential to achieving the United Nation's Sustainable Development Goals. To better understand the health impacts of transportation initiatives, we conducted a systematic review of longitudinal health evaluations involving: a) bus rapid transit (BRT); b) bicycle lanes; c) Open Streets programs; and d) aerial trams/cable cars. We also synthesized systems-based simulation studies of the health-related consequences of walking, bicycling, aerial tram, bus and BRT use.
Two reviewers screened 3302 unique titles and abstracts identified through a systematic search of MEDLINE (Ovid), Scopus, TRID and LILACS databases. We included 39 studies: 29 longitudinal evaluations and 10 simulation studies. Five studies focused on low- and middle-income contexts. Of the 29 evaluation studies, 19 focused on single component bicycle lane interventions; the rest evaluated multi-component interventions involving: bicycle lanes (n = 5), aerial trams (n = 1), and combined bicycle lane/BRT systems (n = 4). Bicycle lanes and BRT systems appeared effective at increasing bicycle and BRT mode share, active transport duration, and number of trips using these modes. Of the 10 simulation studies, there were 9 agent-based models and one system dynamics model. Five studies focused on bus/BRT expansions and incentives, three on interventions for active travel, and the rest investigated combinations of public transport and active travel policies. Synergistic effects were observed when multiple policies were implemented, with several studies showing that sizable interventions are required to significantly shift travel mode choices.
Our review indicates that bicycle lanes and BRT systems represent promising initiatives for promoting population health. There is also evidence to suggest that synergistic effects might be achieved through the combined implementation of multiple transportation policies. However, more rigorous evaluation and simulation studies focusing on low- and middle-income countries, aerial trams and Open Streets programs, and a more diverse set of health and health equity outcomes is required.
This figure represents a word network created by extracting keywords from the paper abstracts included in our systematic review. Each keyword represents a node in the network; its size is proportional to the number of abstracts in which it appears. Keywords are connected if they are found in the same abstract. The colours represent different communities of words as identified using the Louvain method. [Display omitted]
•Bike lanes and bus rapid transit systems promote physical activity and active travel.•Multi-component interventions can act synergistically to increase active travel.•Few longitudinal health evaluations of aerial trams and open streets programs exist.•Low-and-middle income countries are understudied in the literature.</description><subject>Automobiles</subject><subject>Bicycling</subject><subject>Complex systems</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Motor Vehicles</subject><subject>Natural experiment</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Transportation</subject><subject>Walking</subject><issn>0013-9351</issn><issn>1096-0953</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uc1OxCAYJEaj6-obGMMLdOWnoL2YmI1_iYkXPRNKv-6yaWkDbM2-vTTVVS-eYD6YGZhB6IKSBSVUXm0W4AYPYcEIG0eFoMUBmqWNzBLgh2hGCOVZwQU9QachbBKkgpNjdMIZ5yJnNzMU73DYhQitjtZgD4OFD9zVGNreemt0g7WrcLDttkk3OodD3FYWAoZBN9s0cisc14DXoJu4xrbttYmjQPTahb7zcaJZF8EP4EYQztBRrZsA51_rHL0_3L8tn7KX18fn5d1LZnLJYyaooTWpSsF4zljFrnkuC16a0pAyr2lBiTAlk5RKIrkQogapKwopCFJLqms-R7eTbr8tW6hMsve6Ub23rfY71Wmr_p44u1arblDJKUVUJIF8EjC-C8FDvedSosYW1EZNLaixBTW1kGiXv333pO_Yfx4G6fcpcq-CseAMVNaDiarq7P8On6ovntc</recordid><startdate>202007</startdate><enddate>202007</enddate><creator>Stankov, Ivana</creator><creator>Garcia, Leandro M.T.</creator><creator>Mascolli, Maria Antonietta</creator><creator>Montes, Felipe</creator><creator>Meisel, José D.</creator><creator>Gouveia, Nelson</creator><creator>Sarmiento, Olga L.</creator><creator>Rodriguez, Daniel A.</creator><creator>Hammond, Ross A.</creator><creator>Caiaffa, Waleska Teixeira</creator><creator>Diez Roux, Ana V.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202007</creationdate><title>A systematic review of empirical and simulation studies evaluating the health impact of transportation interventions</title><author>Stankov, Ivana ; Garcia, Leandro M.T. ; Mascolli, Maria Antonietta ; Montes, Felipe ; Meisel, José D. ; Gouveia, Nelson ; Sarmiento, Olga L. ; Rodriguez, Daniel A. ; Hammond, Ross A. ; Caiaffa, Waleska Teixeira ; Diez Roux, Ana V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-51c1f0db523422d2734693bcbc0b4f19105cb26116063555fe6ad1e9510f61af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Automobiles</topic><topic>Bicycling</topic><topic>Complex systems</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Motor Vehicles</topic><topic>Natural experiment</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Transportation</topic><topic>Walking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stankov, Ivana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, Leandro M.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mascolli, Maria Antonietta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montes, Felipe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meisel, José D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gouveia, Nelson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarmiento, Olga L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez, Daniel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammond, Ross A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caiaffa, Waleska Teixeira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diez Roux, Ana V.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Environmental research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stankov, Ivana</au><au>Garcia, Leandro M.T.</au><au>Mascolli, Maria Antonietta</au><au>Montes, Felipe</au><au>Meisel, José D.</au><au>Gouveia, Nelson</au><au>Sarmiento, Olga L.</au><au>Rodriguez, Daniel A.</au><au>Hammond, Ross A.</au><au>Caiaffa, Waleska Teixeira</au><au>Diez Roux, Ana V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A systematic review of empirical and simulation studies evaluating the health impact of transportation interventions</atitle><jtitle>Environmental research</jtitle><addtitle>Environ Res</addtitle><date>2020-07</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>186</volume><spage>109519</spage><pages>109519-</pages><artnum>109519</artnum><issn>0013-9351</issn><eissn>1096-0953</eissn><abstract>Urban transportation is an important determinant of health and environmental outcomes, and therefore essential to achieving the United Nation's Sustainable Development Goals. To better understand the health impacts of transportation initiatives, we conducted a systematic review of longitudinal health evaluations involving: a) bus rapid transit (BRT); b) bicycle lanes; c) Open Streets programs; and d) aerial trams/cable cars. We also synthesized systems-based simulation studies of the health-related consequences of walking, bicycling, aerial tram, bus and BRT use.
Two reviewers screened 3302 unique titles and abstracts identified through a systematic search of MEDLINE (Ovid), Scopus, TRID and LILACS databases. We included 39 studies: 29 longitudinal evaluations and 10 simulation studies. Five studies focused on low- and middle-income contexts. Of the 29 evaluation studies, 19 focused on single component bicycle lane interventions; the rest evaluated multi-component interventions involving: bicycle lanes (n = 5), aerial trams (n = 1), and combined bicycle lane/BRT systems (n = 4). Bicycle lanes and BRT systems appeared effective at increasing bicycle and BRT mode share, active transport duration, and number of trips using these modes. Of the 10 simulation studies, there were 9 agent-based models and one system dynamics model. Five studies focused on bus/BRT expansions and incentives, three on interventions for active travel, and the rest investigated combinations of public transport and active travel policies. Synergistic effects were observed when multiple policies were implemented, with several studies showing that sizable interventions are required to significantly shift travel mode choices.
Our review indicates that bicycle lanes and BRT systems represent promising initiatives for promoting population health. There is also evidence to suggest that synergistic effects might be achieved through the combined implementation of multiple transportation policies. However, more rigorous evaluation and simulation studies focusing on low- and middle-income countries, aerial trams and Open Streets programs, and a more diverse set of health and health equity outcomes is required.
This figure represents a word network created by extracting keywords from the paper abstracts included in our systematic review. Each keyword represents a node in the network; its size is proportional to the number of abstracts in which it appears. Keywords are connected if they are found in the same abstract. The colours represent different communities of words as identified using the Louvain method. [Display omitted]
•Bike lanes and bus rapid transit systems promote physical activity and active travel.•Multi-component interventions can act synergistically to increase active travel.•Few longitudinal health evaluations of aerial trams and open streets programs exist.•Low-and-middle income countries are understudied in the literature.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>32335428</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.envres.2020.109519</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0013-9351 |
ispartof | Environmental research, 2020-07, Vol.186, p.109519, Article 109519 |
issn | 0013-9351 1096-0953 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7343239 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Automobiles Bicycling Complex systems Health Motor Vehicles Natural experiment Systematic review Transportation Walking |
title | A systematic review of empirical and simulation studies evaluating the health impact of transportation interventions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T00%3A01%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20systematic%20review%20of%20empirical%20and%20simulation%20studies%20evaluating%20the%20health%20impact%20of%20transportation%20interventions&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20research&rft.au=Stankov,%20Ivana&rft.date=2020-07&rft.volume=186&rft.spage=109519&rft.pages=109519-&rft.artnum=109519&rft.issn=0013-9351&rft.eissn=1096-0953&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109519&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E32335428%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/32335428&rft_els_id=S0013935120304126&rfr_iscdi=true |