The unequal variance signal-detection model of recognition memory: Investigating the encoding variability hypothesis
Despite the unequal variance signal-detection (UVSD) model’s prominence as a model of recognition memory, a psychological explanation for the unequal variance assumption has yet to be verified. According to the encoding variability hypothesis, old item memory strength variance (σo) is greater than t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) 2020-08, Vol.73 (8), p.1242-1260 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1260 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1242 |
container_title | Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) |
container_volume | 73 |
creator | Spanton, Rory W Berry, Christopher J |
description | Despite the unequal variance signal-detection (UVSD) model’s prominence as a model of recognition memory, a psychological explanation for the unequal variance assumption has yet to be verified. According to the encoding variability hypothesis, old item memory strength variance (σo) is greater than that of new items because items are incremented by variable, rather than fixed, amounts of strength at encoding. Conditions that increase encoding variability should therefore result in greater estimates of σo. We conducted three experiments to test this prediction. In Experiment 1, encoding variability was manipulated by presenting items for a fixed or variable (normally distributed) duration at study. In Experiment 2, we used an attentional manipulation whereby participants studied items while performing an auditory one-back task in which distractors were presented at fixed or variable intervals. In Experiment 3, participants studied stimuli with either high or low variance in word frequency. Across experiments, estimates of σo were unaffected by our attempts to manipulate encoding variability, even though the manipulations weakly affected subsequent recognition. Instead, estimates of σo tended to be positively correlated with estimates of the mean difference in strength between new and studied items (d), as might be expected if σo generally scales with d. Our results show that it is surprisingly hard to successfully manipulate encoding variability, and they provide a signpost for others seeking to test the encoding variability hypothesis. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1747021820906117 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7338698</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1747021820906117</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2429413819</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-1f207586a4b714915a5a7e08651400c07d7532091770b75488ab622961684c3b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1v1DAQhiMEoqVw54QsceES6m87HJCqio9Klbi0Z8txZrOuEntrOyvtv8fLtgtU6sn2O8-845lpmvcEfyZEqXOiuMKUaIo7LKvyojndSy2mVL483ok-ad7kfIcxZ0qq180JI52WnaanTblZA1oC3C92QlubvA0OUPZjsFM7QAFXfAxojgNMKK5QAhfH4A8izDHtvqCrsIVc_GiLDyMq1RCCi8P-8cex95MvO7TebWINZp_fNq9Wdsrw7uE8a26_f7u5_Nle__pxdXlx3TpBdWnJimIltLS8V4R3RFhhFWAtBeEYO6wGJVhtvU4C90pwrW0vKe0kkZo71rOz5uvBd7P0MwwOQkl2MpvkZ5t2Jlpv_o8EvzZj3BrF2H4-1eDTg0GK90tt0sw-O5gmGyAu2VDGlSBEMFzRj0_Qu7ikOsVKcdpxwjTpKoUPlEsx5wSr42cINvuVmqcrrSkf_m3imPC4wwq0ByDbEf5WfdbwN5a-qZg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2429413819</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The unequal variance signal-detection model of recognition memory: Investigating the encoding variability hypothesis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Spanton, Rory W ; Berry, Christopher J</creator><creatorcontrib>Spanton, Rory W ; Berry, Christopher J</creatorcontrib><description>Despite the unequal variance signal-detection (UVSD) model’s prominence as a model of recognition memory, a psychological explanation for the unequal variance assumption has yet to be verified. According to the encoding variability hypothesis, old item memory strength variance (σo) is greater than that of new items because items are incremented by variable, rather than fixed, amounts of strength at encoding. Conditions that increase encoding variability should therefore result in greater estimates of σo. We conducted three experiments to test this prediction. In Experiment 1, encoding variability was manipulated by presenting items for a fixed or variable (normally distributed) duration at study. In Experiment 2, we used an attentional manipulation whereby participants studied items while performing an auditory one-back task in which distractors were presented at fixed or variable intervals. In Experiment 3, participants studied stimuli with either high or low variance in word frequency. Across experiments, estimates of σo were unaffected by our attempts to manipulate encoding variability, even though the manipulations weakly affected subsequent recognition. Instead, estimates of σo tended to be positively correlated with estimates of the mean difference in strength between new and studied items (d), as might be expected if σo generally scales with d. Our results show that it is surprisingly hard to successfully manipulate encoding variability, and they provide a signpost for others seeking to test the encoding variability hypothesis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1747-0218</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1747-0226</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1747021820906117</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31986982</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adult ; Attention - physiology ; Experiments ; Female ; Humans ; Hypotheses ; Male ; Memory ; Mental Recall - physiology ; Models, Psychological ; Original ; Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology ; Reading ; Recognition, Psychology - physiology ; Signal Detection, Psychological - physiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2020-08, Vol.73 (8), p.1242-1260</ispartof><rights>Experimental Psychology Society 2020</rights><rights>Experimental Psychology Society 2020 2020 Experimental Pscyhology Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-1f207586a4b714915a5a7e08651400c07d7532091770b75488ab622961684c3b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-1f207586a4b714915a5a7e08651400c07d7532091770b75488ab622961684c3b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3512-3604</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1747021820906117$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1747021820906117$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,21800,27905,27906,43602,43603</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31986982$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Spanton, Rory W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berry, Christopher J</creatorcontrib><title>The unequal variance signal-detection model of recognition memory: Investigating the encoding variability hypothesis</title><title>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</title><addtitle>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)</addtitle><description>Despite the unequal variance signal-detection (UVSD) model’s prominence as a model of recognition memory, a psychological explanation for the unequal variance assumption has yet to be verified. According to the encoding variability hypothesis, old item memory strength variance (σo) is greater than that of new items because items are incremented by variable, rather than fixed, amounts of strength at encoding. Conditions that increase encoding variability should therefore result in greater estimates of σo. We conducted three experiments to test this prediction. In Experiment 1, encoding variability was manipulated by presenting items for a fixed or variable (normally distributed) duration at study. In Experiment 2, we used an attentional manipulation whereby participants studied items while performing an auditory one-back task in which distractors were presented at fixed or variable intervals. In Experiment 3, participants studied stimuli with either high or low variance in word frequency. Across experiments, estimates of σo were unaffected by our attempts to manipulate encoding variability, even though the manipulations weakly affected subsequent recognition. Instead, estimates of σo tended to be positively correlated with estimates of the mean difference in strength between new and studied items (d), as might be expected if σo generally scales with d. Our results show that it is surprisingly hard to successfully manipulate encoding variability, and they provide a signpost for others seeking to test the encoding variability hypothesis.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Mental Recall - physiology</subject><subject>Models, Psychological</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Recognition, Psychology - physiology</subject><subject>Signal Detection, Psychological - physiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1747-0218</issn><issn>1747-0226</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1v1DAQhiMEoqVw54QsceES6m87HJCqio9Klbi0Z8txZrOuEntrOyvtv8fLtgtU6sn2O8-845lpmvcEfyZEqXOiuMKUaIo7LKvyojndSy2mVL483ok-ad7kfIcxZ0qq180JI52WnaanTblZA1oC3C92QlubvA0OUPZjsFM7QAFXfAxojgNMKK5QAhfH4A8izDHtvqCrsIVc_GiLDyMq1RCCi8P-8cex95MvO7TebWINZp_fNq9Wdsrw7uE8a26_f7u5_Nle__pxdXlx3TpBdWnJimIltLS8V4R3RFhhFWAtBeEYO6wGJVhtvU4C90pwrW0vKe0kkZo71rOz5uvBd7P0MwwOQkl2MpvkZ5t2Jlpv_o8EvzZj3BrF2H4-1eDTg0GK90tt0sw-O5gmGyAu2VDGlSBEMFzRj0_Qu7ikOsVKcdpxwjTpKoUPlEsx5wSr42cINvuVmqcrrSkf_m3imPC4wwq0ByDbEf5WfdbwN5a-qZg</recordid><startdate>20200801</startdate><enddate>20200801</enddate><creator>Spanton, Rory W</creator><creator>Berry, Christopher J</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3512-3604</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200801</creationdate><title>The unequal variance signal-detection model of recognition memory: Investigating the encoding variability hypothesis</title><author>Spanton, Rory W ; Berry, Christopher J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-1f207586a4b714915a5a7e08651400c07d7532091770b75488ab622961684c3b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Mental Recall - physiology</topic><topic>Models, Psychological</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Recognition, Psychology - physiology</topic><topic>Signal Detection, Psychological - physiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Spanton, Rory W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berry, Christopher J</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Spanton, Rory W</au><au>Berry, Christopher J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The unequal variance signal-detection model of recognition memory: Investigating the encoding variability hypothesis</atitle><jtitle>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</jtitle><addtitle>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)</addtitle><date>2020-08-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1242</spage><epage>1260</epage><pages>1242-1260</pages><issn>1747-0218</issn><eissn>1747-0226</eissn><abstract>Despite the unequal variance signal-detection (UVSD) model’s prominence as a model of recognition memory, a psychological explanation for the unequal variance assumption has yet to be verified. According to the encoding variability hypothesis, old item memory strength variance (σo) is greater than that of new items because items are incremented by variable, rather than fixed, amounts of strength at encoding. Conditions that increase encoding variability should therefore result in greater estimates of σo. We conducted three experiments to test this prediction. In Experiment 1, encoding variability was manipulated by presenting items for a fixed or variable (normally distributed) duration at study. In Experiment 2, we used an attentional manipulation whereby participants studied items while performing an auditory one-back task in which distractors were presented at fixed or variable intervals. In Experiment 3, participants studied stimuli with either high or low variance in word frequency. Across experiments, estimates of σo were unaffected by our attempts to manipulate encoding variability, even though the manipulations weakly affected subsequent recognition. Instead, estimates of σo tended to be positively correlated with estimates of the mean difference in strength between new and studied items (d), as might be expected if σo generally scales with d. Our results show that it is surprisingly hard to successfully manipulate encoding variability, and they provide a signpost for others seeking to test the encoding variability hypothesis.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>31986982</pmid><doi>10.1177/1747021820906117</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3512-3604</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1747-0218 |
ispartof | Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2020-08, Vol.73 (8), p.1242-1260 |
issn | 1747-0218 1747-0226 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7338698 |
source | MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | Adult Attention - physiology Experiments Female Humans Hypotheses Male Memory Mental Recall - physiology Models, Psychological Original Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology Reading Recognition, Psychology - physiology Signal Detection, Psychological - physiology Young Adult |
title | The unequal variance signal-detection model of recognition memory: Investigating the encoding variability hypothesis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T12%3A17%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20unequal%20variance%20signal-detection%20model%20of%20recognition%20memory:%20Investigating%20the%20encoding%20variability%20hypothesis&rft.jtitle=Quarterly%20journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology%20(2006)&rft.au=Spanton,%20Rory%20W&rft.date=2020-08-01&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1242&rft.epage=1260&rft.pages=1242-1260&rft.issn=1747-0218&rft.eissn=1747-0226&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1747021820906117&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2429413819%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2429413819&rft_id=info:pmid/31986982&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1747021820906117&rfr_iscdi=true |