Estrogenic activity of food contact materials—evaluation of 20 chemicals using a yeast estrogen screen on HPTLC or 96-well plates
Food contact materials (FCM) may contain complex mixtures of estrogenic chemicals. A yeast estrogen screen performed on high performance thin-layer chromatography plates (planar-YES, P-YES) is promising for analysis of such mixtures, as it could allow for better elucidation of effects compared with...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry 2020-07, Vol.412 (19), p.4527-4536 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 4536 |
---|---|
container_issue | 19 |
container_start_page | 4527 |
container_title | Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry |
container_volume | 412 |
creator | Bergmann, Alan J. Simon, Eszter Schifferli, Andrea Schönborn, Andreas Vermeirssen, Etiënne L. M. |
description | Food contact materials (FCM) may contain complex mixtures of estrogenic chemicals. A yeast estrogen screen performed on high performance thin-layer chromatography plates (planar-YES, P-YES) is promising for analysis of such mixtures, as it could allow for better elucidation of effects compared with established methods in microtiter plates. However, the P-YES has not been directly compared with established methods. We compared the performance of a microtiter plate YES (lyticase-YES, L-YES) to P-YES on silica gel HPTLC plates using 17β-estradiol (E2), 20 chemicals representative of migrants from plastic FCM, and three migrates of coated metal food cans. Effective doses (ED
10
, ED
50
) and estradiol equivalencies were calculated for each chemical. Thirteen chemicals had calculable EDs in the L-YES or P-YES, with average EDs 13-fold (range 0.63–36) more potent in P-YES than in the L-YES. Normalized to E2, the median estrogenicity was within 1.5-fold (0.43–8.8) between the assays. Therefore, P-YES was as or more sensitive than L-YES but potencies relative to E2 were comparable between assays. With chromatography, the P-YES detected estrogenicity in coated metal cans, effects that were unmeasurable in L-YES. With the sample preparation methods used in this study, both YES assays are sufficiently sensitive to detect bisphenol A below the specific migration limit for plastic packaging (0.05 mg/kg food). This study demonstrates that P-YES outperforms L-YES because it is more sensitive, provides comparable estradiol equivalents, and circumvents confounding mixture effects. The P-YES will be useful for routine monitoring of FCM and toxicant identification in problematic materials.
Graphical abstract |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00216-020-02701-w |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7329773</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A628319349</galeid><sourcerecordid>A628319349</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c578t-79d6c828564719041375f62cb87a01fd3b6854924fce012de1f97bc6c8c00f513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uk2LFDEQbURxP_QPeJCA516r0t1J-iIsw-oKA3pYzyGTTnqzdCdj0jPD3Bb8C_5Cf4mZnXHWBZEQKlS996gXXlG8QbhAAP4-AVBkJVDIlwOWm2fFKTIUJWUNPD--a3pSnKV0B4CNQPayOKlo3QhAdlr8uEpTDL3xThOlJ7d205YES2wIHdHBT7lJRjWZ6NSQft3_NGs1rNTkgt_BKBB9a0an85CskvM9UWRrVJqIOQiTpKPJJROuv97MZyRE0rJyY4aBLIesnF4VL2zmm9eHel58-3h1M7su518-fZ5dzkvdcDGVvO2YFlQ0rObYQo0VbyyjeiG4ArRdtWCiqVtaW20AaWfQtnyhM0cD2Aar8-LDXne5Woym08ZPUQ1yGd2o4lYG5eTTiXe3sg9rySvacl5lgXcHgRi-r7JBeRdW0eedJa2xpQhc4COqV4ORztuQxfTokpaXjIoK26puM-riH6h8ut13Bm-sy_0nBLon6BhSisYeF0eQuzzIfR5kzoN8yIPcZNLbvy0fKX8CkAHVHpDyyPcmPlr6j-xvyJ_BsQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2419210781</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Estrogenic activity of food contact materials—evaluation of 20 chemicals using a yeast estrogen screen on HPTLC or 96-well plates</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Bergmann, Alan J. ; Simon, Eszter ; Schifferli, Andrea ; Schönborn, Andreas ; Vermeirssen, Etiënne L. M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bergmann, Alan J. ; Simon, Eszter ; Schifferli, Andrea ; Schönborn, Andreas ; Vermeirssen, Etiënne L. M.</creatorcontrib><description>Food contact materials (FCM) may contain complex mixtures of estrogenic chemicals. A yeast estrogen screen performed on high performance thin-layer chromatography plates (planar-YES, P-YES) is promising for analysis of such mixtures, as it could allow for better elucidation of effects compared with established methods in microtiter plates. However, the P-YES has not been directly compared with established methods. We compared the performance of a microtiter plate YES (lyticase-YES, L-YES) to P-YES on silica gel HPTLC plates using 17β-estradiol (E2), 20 chemicals representative of migrants from plastic FCM, and three migrates of coated metal food cans. Effective doses (ED
10
, ED
50
) and estradiol equivalencies were calculated for each chemical. Thirteen chemicals had calculable EDs in the L-YES or P-YES, with average EDs 13-fold (range 0.63–36) more potent in P-YES than in the L-YES. Normalized to E2, the median estrogenicity was within 1.5-fold (0.43–8.8) between the assays. Therefore, P-YES was as or more sensitive than L-YES but potencies relative to E2 were comparable between assays. With chromatography, the P-YES detected estrogenicity in coated metal cans, effects that were unmeasurable in L-YES. With the sample preparation methods used in this study, both YES assays are sufficiently sensitive to detect bisphenol A below the specific migration limit for plastic packaging (0.05 mg/kg food). This study demonstrates that P-YES outperforms L-YES because it is more sensitive, provides comparable estradiol equivalents, and circumvents confounding mixture effects. The P-YES will be useful for routine monitoring of FCM and toxicant identification in problematic materials.
Graphical abstract</description><identifier>ISSN: 1618-2642</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1618-2650</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00216-020-02701-w</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32458016</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>17β-Estradiol ; Analytical Chemistry ; Assaying ; Benzhydryl Compounds - adverse effects ; Benzhydryl Compounds - chemistry ; Biochemistry ; Bisphenol A ; Characterization and Evaluation of Materials ; Chemicals ; Chemistry ; Chemistry and Materials Science ; Chromatography ; Chromatography, Thin Layer - methods ; Comparative analysis ; Endocrine Disruptors - adverse effects ; Endocrine Disruptors - chemistry ; Equivalence ; Estradiol ; Estrogenic activity ; Estrogens ; Estrogens - adverse effects ; Estrogens - chemistry ; Food ; Food cans ; Food Packaging ; Food Science ; Laboratory Medicine ; Monitoring/Environmental Analysis ; Phenols ; Phenols - adverse effects ; Phenols - chemistry ; Research Paper ; Saccharomyces cerevisiae - drug effects ; Sample preparation ; Sex hormones ; Silica ; Silica gel ; Silicon dioxide ; Thin layer chromatography ; Toxicants ; Toxicity Tests - methods ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - adverse effects ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - chemistry ; Xenoestrogens ; Yeast ; Yeasts</subject><ispartof>Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2020-07, Vol.412 (19), p.4527-4536</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c578t-79d6c828564719041375f62cb87a01fd3b6854924fce012de1f97bc6c8c00f513</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c578t-79d6c828564719041375f62cb87a01fd3b6854924fce012de1f97bc6c8c00f513</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3069-5152</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00216-020-02701-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00216-020-02701-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32458016$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bergmann, Alan J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon, Eszter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schifferli, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schönborn, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vermeirssen, Etiënne L. M.</creatorcontrib><title>Estrogenic activity of food contact materials—evaluation of 20 chemicals using a yeast estrogen screen on HPTLC or 96-well plates</title><title>Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry</title><addtitle>Anal Bioanal Chem</addtitle><addtitle>Anal Bioanal Chem</addtitle><description>Food contact materials (FCM) may contain complex mixtures of estrogenic chemicals. A yeast estrogen screen performed on high performance thin-layer chromatography plates (planar-YES, P-YES) is promising for analysis of such mixtures, as it could allow for better elucidation of effects compared with established methods in microtiter plates. However, the P-YES has not been directly compared with established methods. We compared the performance of a microtiter plate YES (lyticase-YES, L-YES) to P-YES on silica gel HPTLC plates using 17β-estradiol (E2), 20 chemicals representative of migrants from plastic FCM, and three migrates of coated metal food cans. Effective doses (ED
10
, ED
50
) and estradiol equivalencies were calculated for each chemical. Thirteen chemicals had calculable EDs in the L-YES or P-YES, with average EDs 13-fold (range 0.63–36) more potent in P-YES than in the L-YES. Normalized to E2, the median estrogenicity was within 1.5-fold (0.43–8.8) between the assays. Therefore, P-YES was as or more sensitive than L-YES but potencies relative to E2 were comparable between assays. With chromatography, the P-YES detected estrogenicity in coated metal cans, effects that were unmeasurable in L-YES. With the sample preparation methods used in this study, both YES assays are sufficiently sensitive to detect bisphenol A below the specific migration limit for plastic packaging (0.05 mg/kg food). This study demonstrates that P-YES outperforms L-YES because it is more sensitive, provides comparable estradiol equivalents, and circumvents confounding mixture effects. The P-YES will be useful for routine monitoring of FCM and toxicant identification in problematic materials.
Graphical abstract</description><subject>17β-Estradiol</subject><subject>Analytical Chemistry</subject><subject>Assaying</subject><subject>Benzhydryl Compounds - adverse effects</subject><subject>Benzhydryl Compounds - chemistry</subject><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Bisphenol A</subject><subject>Characterization and Evaluation of Materials</subject><subject>Chemicals</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science</subject><subject>Chromatography</subject><subject>Chromatography, Thin Layer - methods</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Endocrine Disruptors - adverse effects</subject><subject>Endocrine Disruptors - chemistry</subject><subject>Equivalence</subject><subject>Estradiol</subject><subject>Estrogenic activity</subject><subject>Estrogens</subject><subject>Estrogens - adverse effects</subject><subject>Estrogens - chemistry</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food cans</subject><subject>Food Packaging</subject><subject>Food Science</subject><subject>Laboratory Medicine</subject><subject>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</subject><subject>Phenols</subject><subject>Phenols - adverse effects</subject><subject>Phenols - chemistry</subject><subject>Research Paper</subject><subject>Saccharomyces cerevisiae - drug effects</subject><subject>Sample preparation</subject><subject>Sex hormones</subject><subject>Silica</subject><subject>Silica gel</subject><subject>Silicon dioxide</subject><subject>Thin layer chromatography</subject><subject>Toxicants</subject><subject>Toxicity Tests - methods</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - adverse effects</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - chemistry</subject><subject>Xenoestrogens</subject><subject>Yeast</subject><subject>Yeasts</subject><issn>1618-2642</issn><issn>1618-2650</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uk2LFDEQbURxP_QPeJCA516r0t1J-iIsw-oKA3pYzyGTTnqzdCdj0jPD3Bb8C_5Cf4mZnXHWBZEQKlS996gXXlG8QbhAAP4-AVBkJVDIlwOWm2fFKTIUJWUNPD--a3pSnKV0B4CNQPayOKlo3QhAdlr8uEpTDL3xThOlJ7d205YES2wIHdHBT7lJRjWZ6NSQft3_NGs1rNTkgt_BKBB9a0an85CskvM9UWRrVJqIOQiTpKPJJROuv97MZyRE0rJyY4aBLIesnF4VL2zmm9eHel58-3h1M7su518-fZ5dzkvdcDGVvO2YFlQ0rObYQo0VbyyjeiG4ArRdtWCiqVtaW20AaWfQtnyhM0cD2Aar8-LDXne5Woym08ZPUQ1yGd2o4lYG5eTTiXe3sg9rySvacl5lgXcHgRi-r7JBeRdW0eedJa2xpQhc4COqV4ORztuQxfTokpaXjIoK26puM-riH6h8ut13Bm-sy_0nBLon6BhSisYeF0eQuzzIfR5kzoN8yIPcZNLbvy0fKX8CkAHVHpDyyPcmPlr6j-xvyJ_BsQ</recordid><startdate>20200701</startdate><enddate>20200701</enddate><creator>Bergmann, Alan J.</creator><creator>Simon, Eszter</creator><creator>Schifferli, Andrea</creator><creator>Schönborn, Andreas</creator><creator>Vermeirssen, Etiënne L. M.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3069-5152</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200701</creationdate><title>Estrogenic activity of food contact materials—evaluation of 20 chemicals using a yeast estrogen screen on HPTLC or 96-well plates</title><author>Bergmann, Alan J. ; Simon, Eszter ; Schifferli, Andrea ; Schönborn, Andreas ; Vermeirssen, Etiënne L. M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c578t-79d6c828564719041375f62cb87a01fd3b6854924fce012de1f97bc6c8c00f513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>17β-Estradiol</topic><topic>Analytical Chemistry</topic><topic>Assaying</topic><topic>Benzhydryl Compounds - adverse effects</topic><topic>Benzhydryl Compounds - chemistry</topic><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Bisphenol A</topic><topic>Characterization and Evaluation of Materials</topic><topic>Chemicals</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry and Materials Science</topic><topic>Chromatography</topic><topic>Chromatography, Thin Layer - methods</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Endocrine Disruptors - adverse effects</topic><topic>Endocrine Disruptors - chemistry</topic><topic>Equivalence</topic><topic>Estradiol</topic><topic>Estrogenic activity</topic><topic>Estrogens</topic><topic>Estrogens - adverse effects</topic><topic>Estrogens - chemistry</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food cans</topic><topic>Food Packaging</topic><topic>Food Science</topic><topic>Laboratory Medicine</topic><topic>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</topic><topic>Phenols</topic><topic>Phenols - adverse effects</topic><topic>Phenols - chemistry</topic><topic>Research Paper</topic><topic>Saccharomyces cerevisiae - drug effects</topic><topic>Sample preparation</topic><topic>Sex hormones</topic><topic>Silica</topic><topic>Silica gel</topic><topic>Silicon dioxide</topic><topic>Thin layer chromatography</topic><topic>Toxicants</topic><topic>Toxicity Tests - methods</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - adverse effects</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - chemistry</topic><topic>Xenoestrogens</topic><topic>Yeast</topic><topic>Yeasts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bergmann, Alan J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon, Eszter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schifferli, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schönborn, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vermeirssen, Etiënne L. M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bergmann, Alan J.</au><au>Simon, Eszter</au><au>Schifferli, Andrea</au><au>Schönborn, Andreas</au><au>Vermeirssen, Etiënne L. M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Estrogenic activity of food contact materials—evaluation of 20 chemicals using a yeast estrogen screen on HPTLC or 96-well plates</atitle><jtitle>Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry</jtitle><stitle>Anal Bioanal Chem</stitle><addtitle>Anal Bioanal Chem</addtitle><date>2020-07-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>412</volume><issue>19</issue><spage>4527</spage><epage>4536</epage><pages>4527-4536</pages><issn>1618-2642</issn><eissn>1618-2650</eissn><abstract>Food contact materials (FCM) may contain complex mixtures of estrogenic chemicals. A yeast estrogen screen performed on high performance thin-layer chromatography plates (planar-YES, P-YES) is promising for analysis of such mixtures, as it could allow for better elucidation of effects compared with established methods in microtiter plates. However, the P-YES has not been directly compared with established methods. We compared the performance of a microtiter plate YES (lyticase-YES, L-YES) to P-YES on silica gel HPTLC plates using 17β-estradiol (E2), 20 chemicals representative of migrants from plastic FCM, and three migrates of coated metal food cans. Effective doses (ED
10
, ED
50
) and estradiol equivalencies were calculated for each chemical. Thirteen chemicals had calculable EDs in the L-YES or P-YES, with average EDs 13-fold (range 0.63–36) more potent in P-YES than in the L-YES. Normalized to E2, the median estrogenicity was within 1.5-fold (0.43–8.8) between the assays. Therefore, P-YES was as or more sensitive than L-YES but potencies relative to E2 were comparable between assays. With chromatography, the P-YES detected estrogenicity in coated metal cans, effects that were unmeasurable in L-YES. With the sample preparation methods used in this study, both YES assays are sufficiently sensitive to detect bisphenol A below the specific migration limit for plastic packaging (0.05 mg/kg food). This study demonstrates that P-YES outperforms L-YES because it is more sensitive, provides comparable estradiol equivalents, and circumvents confounding mixture effects. The P-YES will be useful for routine monitoring of FCM and toxicant identification in problematic materials.
Graphical abstract</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>32458016</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00216-020-02701-w</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3069-5152</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1618-2642 |
ispartof | Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2020-07, Vol.412 (19), p.4527-4536 |
issn | 1618-2642 1618-2650 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7329773 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | 17β-Estradiol Analytical Chemistry Assaying Benzhydryl Compounds - adverse effects Benzhydryl Compounds - chemistry Biochemistry Bisphenol A Characterization and Evaluation of Materials Chemicals Chemistry Chemistry and Materials Science Chromatography Chromatography, Thin Layer - methods Comparative analysis Endocrine Disruptors - adverse effects Endocrine Disruptors - chemistry Equivalence Estradiol Estrogenic activity Estrogens Estrogens - adverse effects Estrogens - chemistry Food Food cans Food Packaging Food Science Laboratory Medicine Monitoring/Environmental Analysis Phenols Phenols - adverse effects Phenols - chemistry Research Paper Saccharomyces cerevisiae - drug effects Sample preparation Sex hormones Silica Silica gel Silicon dioxide Thin layer chromatography Toxicants Toxicity Tests - methods Water Pollutants, Chemical - adverse effects Water Pollutants, Chemical - chemistry Xenoestrogens Yeast Yeasts |
title | Estrogenic activity of food contact materials—evaluation of 20 chemicals using a yeast estrogen screen on HPTLC or 96-well plates |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T12%3A30%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Estrogenic%20activity%20of%20food%20contact%20materials%E2%80%94evaluation%20of%2020%20chemicals%20using%20a%20yeast%20estrogen%20screen%20on%20HPTLC%20or%2096-well%20plates&rft.jtitle=Analytical%20and%20bioanalytical%20chemistry&rft.au=Bergmann,%20Alan%20J.&rft.date=2020-07-01&rft.volume=412&rft.issue=19&rft.spage=4527&rft.epage=4536&rft.pages=4527-4536&rft.issn=1618-2642&rft.eissn=1618-2650&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00216-020-02701-w&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA628319349%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2419210781&rft_id=info:pmid/32458016&rft_galeid=A628319349&rfr_iscdi=true |