Coronavirus mapping in scientific publications: When science advances rapidly and collectively, is access to this knowledge open to society?

The COVID-19 pandemic is creating a global health emergency. Mapping this health emergency in scientific publications demands multiple approaches to obtain a picture as complete as possible. To progress in the knowledge of this pandemic and to control its effects, international collaborations betwee...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scientometrics 2020, Vol.124 (3), p.2661-2685
Hauptverfasser: Belli, Simone, Mugnaini, Rogério, Baltà, Joan, Abadal, Ernest
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2685
container_issue 3
container_start_page 2661
container_title Scientometrics
container_volume 124
creator Belli, Simone
Mugnaini, Rogério
Baltà, Joan
Abadal, Ernest
description The COVID-19 pandemic is creating a global health emergency. Mapping this health emergency in scientific publications demands multiple approaches to obtain a picture as complete as possible. To progress in the knowledge of this pandemic and to control its effects, international collaborations between researchers are essentials, as well as having open and immediate access to scientific publications, what we called “coopetition”. Our main objectives are to identify the most productive countries in coronavirus publications, to analyse the international scientific collaboration on this topic, and to study the proportion and typology of open accessibility to these publications. We have analyzed 18,875 articles indexed in Web of Science. We performed the descriptive statistical analysis in order to explore the performance of the more prolific countries and organizations, as well as paying attention to the last 2 years. Registers have been analyzed separately via the VOSviewer software, drawing a network of links among countries and organizations to identify the starred countries and organizations, and the strongest links of the net. We have explored the capacity of researchers to generate scientific knowledge about a health crisis emergency, and their global capacity to collaborate among them in a global emergency. We consider that science is moving rapidly to find solutions to international health problems but access to this knowledge by society is not so quick due to several limitations (open access policies, corporate interests, etc.). We have observed that papers from China in the last 3 months (from January 2020 to March 2020) have a strong impact compared with papers published in years before. The United States and China are the major producers of documents of our sample, followed by all European countries, especially the United Kingdom, Germany, the Netherlands, and France. At the same time, the leading role of Saudi Arabia, Canada or South Korea should be noted, with a significant number of documents submitted but very different dynamics of international collaboration. The proportion of international collaboration is growing in all countries in 2019–2020, which contrasts with the situation of the last two decades. The organizations providing the most documents to the sample are mostly Chinese. The percentage of open access articles on coronavirus for the period 2001–2020 is 59.2% but if we focus in 2020 the figures increase up to 91.4%, due to the commit
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11192-020-03590-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7328881</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2437124738</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c527t-decaded648e8ac5430103e3e98cba8d3047e638ab152629eb3a2cfc6d6076f353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcuOEzEQRS0EYkLgB1ggS2xY0OBHd9vNAoQiXtJIbEAsLceuJB4cu7G7g_IPfDQFCcNjwapk16nrur6E3OfsCWdMPa2c80E0TLCGyW5gjbpBFrzTuhG65zfJgnGpm4FLdkHu1HrFcEgyfZtcSKFl34l-Qb6tcsnJHkKZK93bcQxpS0Oi1QVIU9gER8d5HYOzU8ipPqOfdnDuOqDWHyzWSosdg49HapOnLscIbgoHiMfHNFRqHSKVTplOOzx-TvlrBL8FmkfUwuuaUW86vrhLbm1srHDvXJfk4-tXH1Zvm8v3b96tXl42rhNqajw468H3rQZtXddKxpkECYN2a6u9ZK2CXmq75mhRDLCWVriN633PVL-RnVyS5yddtLYH79BpsdGMJextOZpsg_m7k8LObPPBKPw4rTkKPDoLlPxlhjqZfagOYrQJ8lyNaKXiolVSI_rwH_QqzyWhPaSEklxp0SMlTpQrudYCm-tlODM_wjansA2GbX6GjbssyYM_bVyP_EoXAXkCKrbSFsrvt_8j-x0dYbjY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2427317826</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Coronavirus mapping in scientific publications: When science advances rapidly and collectively, is access to this knowledge open to society?</title><source>Springer Journals</source><creator>Belli, Simone ; Mugnaini, Rogério ; Baltà, Joan ; Abadal, Ernest</creator><creatorcontrib>Belli, Simone ; Mugnaini, Rogério ; Baltà, Joan ; Abadal, Ernest</creatorcontrib><description>The COVID-19 pandemic is creating a global health emergency. Mapping this health emergency in scientific publications demands multiple approaches to obtain a picture as complete as possible. To progress in the knowledge of this pandemic and to control its effects, international collaborations between researchers are essentials, as well as having open and immediate access to scientific publications, what we called “coopetition”. Our main objectives are to identify the most productive countries in coronavirus publications, to analyse the international scientific collaboration on this topic, and to study the proportion and typology of open accessibility to these publications. We have analyzed 18,875 articles indexed in Web of Science. We performed the descriptive statistical analysis in order to explore the performance of the more prolific countries and organizations, as well as paying attention to the last 2 years. Registers have been analyzed separately via the VOSviewer software, drawing a network of links among countries and organizations to identify the starred countries and organizations, and the strongest links of the net. We have explored the capacity of researchers to generate scientific knowledge about a health crisis emergency, and their global capacity to collaborate among them in a global emergency. We consider that science is moving rapidly to find solutions to international health problems but access to this knowledge by society is not so quick due to several limitations (open access policies, corporate interests, etc.). We have observed that papers from China in the last 3 months (from January 2020 to March 2020) have a strong impact compared with papers published in years before. The United States and China are the major producers of documents of our sample, followed by all European countries, especially the United Kingdom, Germany, the Netherlands, and France. At the same time, the leading role of Saudi Arabia, Canada or South Korea should be noted, with a significant number of documents submitted but very different dynamics of international collaboration. The proportion of international collaboration is growing in all countries in 2019–2020, which contrasts with the situation of the last two decades. The organizations providing the most documents to the sample are mostly Chinese. The percentage of open access articles on coronavirus for the period 2001–2020 is 59.2% but if we focus in 2020 the figures increase up to 91.4%, due to the commitment of commercial publishers with the emergency.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0138-9130</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1588-2861</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11192-020-03590-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32836526</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Bibliometrics ; Collaboration ; Computer Science ; Coronaviridae ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; Documents ; Emergencies ; Global health ; Health problems ; Information Storage and Retrieval ; International cooperation ; Library Science ; Mapping ; Organizations ; Pandemics ; Researchers ; Scientific papers ; Statistical analysis ; Typology</subject><ispartof>Scientometrics, 2020, Vol.124 (3), p.2661-2685</ispartof><rights>Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2020</rights><rights>Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c527t-decaded648e8ac5430103e3e98cba8d3047e638ab152629eb3a2cfc6d6076f353</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c527t-decaded648e8ac5430103e3e98cba8d3047e638ab152629eb3a2cfc6d6076f353</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8934-7569</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11192-020-03590-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-020-03590-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32836526$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Belli, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mugnaini, Rogério</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baltà, Joan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abadal, Ernest</creatorcontrib><title>Coronavirus mapping in scientific publications: When science advances rapidly and collectively, is access to this knowledge open to society?</title><title>Scientometrics</title><addtitle>Scientometrics</addtitle><addtitle>Scientometrics</addtitle><description>The COVID-19 pandemic is creating a global health emergency. Mapping this health emergency in scientific publications demands multiple approaches to obtain a picture as complete as possible. To progress in the knowledge of this pandemic and to control its effects, international collaborations between researchers are essentials, as well as having open and immediate access to scientific publications, what we called “coopetition”. Our main objectives are to identify the most productive countries in coronavirus publications, to analyse the international scientific collaboration on this topic, and to study the proportion and typology of open accessibility to these publications. We have analyzed 18,875 articles indexed in Web of Science. We performed the descriptive statistical analysis in order to explore the performance of the more prolific countries and organizations, as well as paying attention to the last 2 years. Registers have been analyzed separately via the VOSviewer software, drawing a network of links among countries and organizations to identify the starred countries and organizations, and the strongest links of the net. We have explored the capacity of researchers to generate scientific knowledge about a health crisis emergency, and their global capacity to collaborate among them in a global emergency. We consider that science is moving rapidly to find solutions to international health problems but access to this knowledge by society is not so quick due to several limitations (open access policies, corporate interests, etc.). We have observed that papers from China in the last 3 months (from January 2020 to March 2020) have a strong impact compared with papers published in years before. The United States and China are the major producers of documents of our sample, followed by all European countries, especially the United Kingdom, Germany, the Netherlands, and France. At the same time, the leading role of Saudi Arabia, Canada or South Korea should be noted, with a significant number of documents submitted but very different dynamics of international collaboration. The proportion of international collaboration is growing in all countries in 2019–2020, which contrasts with the situation of the last two decades. The organizations providing the most documents to the sample are mostly Chinese. The percentage of open access articles on coronavirus for the period 2001–2020 is 59.2% but if we focus in 2020 the figures increase up to 91.4%, due to the commitment of commercial publishers with the emergency.</description><subject>Bibliometrics</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Coronaviridae</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Documents</subject><subject>Emergencies</subject><subject>Global health</subject><subject>Health problems</subject><subject>Information Storage and Retrieval</subject><subject>International cooperation</subject><subject>Library Science</subject><subject>Mapping</subject><subject>Organizations</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Scientific papers</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Typology</subject><issn>0138-9130</issn><issn>1588-2861</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kcuOEzEQRS0EYkLgB1ggS2xY0OBHd9vNAoQiXtJIbEAsLceuJB4cu7G7g_IPfDQFCcNjwapk16nrur6E3OfsCWdMPa2c80E0TLCGyW5gjbpBFrzTuhG65zfJgnGpm4FLdkHu1HrFcEgyfZtcSKFl34l-Qb6tcsnJHkKZK93bcQxpS0Oi1QVIU9gER8d5HYOzU8ipPqOfdnDuOqDWHyzWSosdg49HapOnLscIbgoHiMfHNFRqHSKVTplOOzx-TvlrBL8FmkfUwuuaUW86vrhLbm1srHDvXJfk4-tXH1Zvm8v3b96tXl42rhNqajw468H3rQZtXddKxpkECYN2a6u9ZK2CXmq75mhRDLCWVriN633PVL-RnVyS5yddtLYH79BpsdGMJextOZpsg_m7k8LObPPBKPw4rTkKPDoLlPxlhjqZfagOYrQJ8lyNaKXiolVSI_rwH_QqzyWhPaSEklxp0SMlTpQrudYCm-tlODM_wjansA2GbX6GjbssyYM_bVyP_EoXAXkCKrbSFsrvt_8j-x0dYbjY</recordid><startdate>2020</startdate><enddate>2020</enddate><creator>Belli, Simone</creator><creator>Mugnaini, Rogério</creator><creator>Baltà, Joan</creator><creator>Abadal, Ernest</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8934-7569</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2020</creationdate><title>Coronavirus mapping in scientific publications: When science advances rapidly and collectively, is access to this knowledge open to society?</title><author>Belli, Simone ; Mugnaini, Rogério ; Baltà, Joan ; Abadal, Ernest</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c527t-decaded648e8ac5430103e3e98cba8d3047e638ab152629eb3a2cfc6d6076f353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Bibliometrics</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Coronaviridae</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Documents</topic><topic>Emergencies</topic><topic>Global health</topic><topic>Health problems</topic><topic>Information Storage and Retrieval</topic><topic>International cooperation</topic><topic>Library Science</topic><topic>Mapping</topic><topic>Organizations</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Scientific papers</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Typology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Belli, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mugnaini, Rogério</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baltà, Joan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abadal, Ernest</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Scientometrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Belli, Simone</au><au>Mugnaini, Rogério</au><au>Baltà, Joan</au><au>Abadal, Ernest</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Coronavirus mapping in scientific publications: When science advances rapidly and collectively, is access to this knowledge open to society?</atitle><jtitle>Scientometrics</jtitle><stitle>Scientometrics</stitle><addtitle>Scientometrics</addtitle><date>2020</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>124</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>2661</spage><epage>2685</epage><pages>2661-2685</pages><issn>0138-9130</issn><eissn>1588-2861</eissn><abstract>The COVID-19 pandemic is creating a global health emergency. Mapping this health emergency in scientific publications demands multiple approaches to obtain a picture as complete as possible. To progress in the knowledge of this pandemic and to control its effects, international collaborations between researchers are essentials, as well as having open and immediate access to scientific publications, what we called “coopetition”. Our main objectives are to identify the most productive countries in coronavirus publications, to analyse the international scientific collaboration on this topic, and to study the proportion and typology of open accessibility to these publications. We have analyzed 18,875 articles indexed in Web of Science. We performed the descriptive statistical analysis in order to explore the performance of the more prolific countries and organizations, as well as paying attention to the last 2 years. Registers have been analyzed separately via the VOSviewer software, drawing a network of links among countries and organizations to identify the starred countries and organizations, and the strongest links of the net. We have explored the capacity of researchers to generate scientific knowledge about a health crisis emergency, and their global capacity to collaborate among them in a global emergency. We consider that science is moving rapidly to find solutions to international health problems but access to this knowledge by society is not so quick due to several limitations (open access policies, corporate interests, etc.). We have observed that papers from China in the last 3 months (from January 2020 to March 2020) have a strong impact compared with papers published in years before. The United States and China are the major producers of documents of our sample, followed by all European countries, especially the United Kingdom, Germany, the Netherlands, and France. At the same time, the leading role of Saudi Arabia, Canada or South Korea should be noted, with a significant number of documents submitted but very different dynamics of international collaboration. The proportion of international collaboration is growing in all countries in 2019–2020, which contrasts with the situation of the last two decades. The organizations providing the most documents to the sample are mostly Chinese. The percentage of open access articles on coronavirus for the period 2001–2020 is 59.2% but if we focus in 2020 the figures increase up to 91.4%, due to the commitment of commercial publishers with the emergency.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>32836526</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11192-020-03590-7</doi><tpages>25</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8934-7569</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0138-9130
ispartof Scientometrics, 2020, Vol.124 (3), p.2661-2685
issn 0138-9130
1588-2861
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7328881
source Springer Journals
subjects Bibliometrics
Collaboration
Computer Science
Coronaviridae
Coronaviruses
COVID-19
Documents
Emergencies
Global health
Health problems
Information Storage and Retrieval
International cooperation
Library Science
Mapping
Organizations
Pandemics
Researchers
Scientific papers
Statistical analysis
Typology
title Coronavirus mapping in scientific publications: When science advances rapidly and collectively, is access to this knowledge open to society?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T22%3A21%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Coronavirus%20mapping%20in%20scientific%20publications:%20When%20science%20advances%20rapidly%20and%20collectively,%20is%20access%20to%20this%20knowledge%20open%20to%20society?&rft.jtitle=Scientometrics&rft.au=Belli,%20Simone&rft.date=2020&rft.volume=124&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=2661&rft.epage=2685&rft.pages=2661-2685&rft.issn=0138-9130&rft.eissn=1588-2861&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11192-020-03590-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2437124738%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2427317826&rft_id=info:pmid/32836526&rfr_iscdi=true