Flavor-specific enhancement of electronic cigarette liquid consumption and preference in mice
•Fruit flavor, but not tobacco flavor, enhances e-liquid consumption and preference.•The nicotine-free flavored e-liquid is not preferred over nicotine alone.•Conditioning rewarding and aversive effects are equal between nicotine and e-liquid. The use of electronic cigarettes has increased over the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Drug and alcohol dependence 2020-06, Vol.211, p.107995-107995, Article 107995 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 107995 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 107995 |
container_title | Drug and alcohol dependence |
container_volume | 211 |
creator | Wong, A.L. McElroy, S.M. Robinson, J.M. Mulloy, S.M. El Banna, F.K. Harris, A.C. LeSage, M.G. Lee, A.M. |
description | •Fruit flavor, but not tobacco flavor, enhances e-liquid consumption and preference.•The nicotine-free flavored e-liquid is not preferred over nicotine alone.•Conditioning rewarding and aversive effects are equal between nicotine and e-liquid.
The use of electronic cigarettes has increased over the past decade. To determine how the abuse liability of electronic cigarette liquids (e-liquids) differs from nicotine alone, and to determine the impact of flavor, we compared nicotine-containing fruit- and tobacco-flavored e-liquids, and their nicotine-free versions, to nicotine alone in mouse models of oral consumption, reward and aversion.
Adult male C57BL/6 J mice voluntarily consumed oral nicotine, equivalent nicotine concentrations of fruit- and tobacco-flavored e-liquid, and equivalent dilutions of the nicotine-free versions in 2-bottle choice tests. Conditioned place preference and place aversion were assessed with peripherally administered e-liquids or nicotine. Serum nicotine and cotinine levels were measured after subcutaneous injections of e-liquid or nicotine.
Mice showed higher consumption and preference for the fruit-flavored e-liquid compared with nicotine alone. This increase was not due to the flavor itself as consumption of the nicotine-free fruit-flavored e-liquid was not elevated until the highest concentration tested. The increased consumption and preference were not observed with the tobacco-flavored e-liquid. The conditioned place preference, place aversion and nicotine pharmacokinetics of the fruit-flavored e-liquid were not significantly different from nicotine alone.
Our data suggest that fruit, but not tobacco flavor, increased the oral consumption of e-liquid compared with nicotine alone. Moreover, this enhancement was not due to increased consumption of the flavor itself, altered rewarding or aversive properties after peripheral administration, or altered pharmacokinetics. This flavor-specific enhancement suggests that some flavors may lead to higher nicotine intake and increased use of e-liquids compared with nicotine alone. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.107995 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7328293</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0376871620301605</els_id><sourcerecordid>2442965106</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-9fb1593651f978d6b4e38b2d40d7f93fd97f9bdde8f292f798e194aa7cf090d73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUU1v1DAQtRCIbgt_AVninMUfSWxfkKBqS6VKvZQjshx7vPUqsVM7WYl_j1dbCpzwZSTPe2_ezEMIU7KlhPaf9luX150ZrYN5ywg7fgululdoQ6VQDSFt_xptCBd9IwXtz9B5KXtSX6_IW3TGGe_aTpIN-nE9mkPKTZnBBh8shvhoooUJ4oKTxzCCXXKKtWPDzmRYFsBjeFqDwzbFsk7zElLEJjo8Z_CQobJxiHgKFt6hN96MBd4_1wv0_frq4fJbc3d_c3v55a6xHRFLo_xAO8X7jnolpOuHFrgcmGuJE15x71Qtg3MgPVPMCyWBqtYYYT1RFcMv0OeT7rwOEzhbzWcz6jmHyeSfOpmg_-3E8Kh36aAFZ5IpXgU-Pgvk9LRCWfQ-rTlWz5q1LVPVGukrSp5QNqdS6rYvEyjRx2D0Xv8JRh-D0adgKvXD3w5fiL-TqICvJwDUOx0CZF1sON7ShVwj0C6F_0_5Bdl0pww</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2442965106</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Flavor-specific enhancement of electronic cigarette liquid consumption and preference in mice</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Wong, A.L. ; McElroy, S.M. ; Robinson, J.M. ; Mulloy, S.M. ; El Banna, F.K. ; Harris, A.C. ; LeSage, M.G. ; Lee, A.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wong, A.L. ; McElroy, S.M. ; Robinson, J.M. ; Mulloy, S.M. ; El Banna, F.K. ; Harris, A.C. ; LeSage, M.G. ; Lee, A.M.</creatorcontrib><description>•Fruit flavor, but not tobacco flavor, enhances e-liquid consumption and preference.•The nicotine-free flavored e-liquid is not preferred over nicotine alone.•Conditioning rewarding and aversive effects are equal between nicotine and e-liquid.
The use of electronic cigarettes has increased over the past decade. To determine how the abuse liability of electronic cigarette liquids (e-liquids) differs from nicotine alone, and to determine the impact of flavor, we compared nicotine-containing fruit- and tobacco-flavored e-liquids, and their nicotine-free versions, to nicotine alone in mouse models of oral consumption, reward and aversion.
Adult male C57BL/6 J mice voluntarily consumed oral nicotine, equivalent nicotine concentrations of fruit- and tobacco-flavored e-liquid, and equivalent dilutions of the nicotine-free versions in 2-bottle choice tests. Conditioned place preference and place aversion were assessed with peripherally administered e-liquids or nicotine. Serum nicotine and cotinine levels were measured after subcutaneous injections of e-liquid or nicotine.
Mice showed higher consumption and preference for the fruit-flavored e-liquid compared with nicotine alone. This increase was not due to the flavor itself as consumption of the nicotine-free fruit-flavored e-liquid was not elevated until the highest concentration tested. The increased consumption and preference were not observed with the tobacco-flavored e-liquid. The conditioned place preference, place aversion and nicotine pharmacokinetics of the fruit-flavored e-liquid were not significantly different from nicotine alone.
Our data suggest that fruit, but not tobacco flavor, increased the oral consumption of e-liquid compared with nicotine alone. Moreover, this enhancement was not due to increased consumption of the flavor itself, altered rewarding or aversive properties after peripheral administration, or altered pharmacokinetics. This flavor-specific enhancement suggests that some flavors may lead to higher nicotine intake and increased use of e-liquids compared with nicotine alone.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0376-8716</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0046</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.107995</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32354580</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Abuse ; Animal models ; Animals ; Aversion ; Aversive ; Choice Behavior - drug effects ; Choice Behavior - physiology ; Cigarettes ; Consumption ; Cotinine ; Cotinine levels ; Electronic cigarette ; Electronic cigarettes ; Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems ; Equivalence ; Flavor ; Flavoring Agents - administration & dosage ; Flavors ; Fruit ; Fruits ; Liability ; Liquids ; Male ; Mice ; Mice, Inbred C57BL ; Nicotiana ; Nicotine ; Nicotine - administration & dosage ; Pharmacokinetics ; Pharmacology ; Place preference conditioning ; preference ; Reinforcement ; Serum ; Smoking ; Taste - drug effects ; Taste - physiology ; Tobacco</subject><ispartof>Drug and alcohol dependence, 2020-06, Vol.211, p.107995-107995, Article 107995</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jun 1, 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-9fb1593651f978d6b4e38b2d40d7f93fd97f9bdde8f292f798e194aa7cf090d73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-9fb1593651f978d6b4e38b2d40d7f93fd97f9bdde8f292f798e194aa7cf090d73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.107995$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,30999,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32354580$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wong, A.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McElroy, S.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulloy, S.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El Banna, F.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, A.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LeSage, M.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, A.M.</creatorcontrib><title>Flavor-specific enhancement of electronic cigarette liquid consumption and preference in mice</title><title>Drug and alcohol dependence</title><addtitle>Drug Alcohol Depend</addtitle><description>•Fruit flavor, but not tobacco flavor, enhances e-liquid consumption and preference.•The nicotine-free flavored e-liquid is not preferred over nicotine alone.•Conditioning rewarding and aversive effects are equal between nicotine and e-liquid.
The use of electronic cigarettes has increased over the past decade. To determine how the abuse liability of electronic cigarette liquids (e-liquids) differs from nicotine alone, and to determine the impact of flavor, we compared nicotine-containing fruit- and tobacco-flavored e-liquids, and their nicotine-free versions, to nicotine alone in mouse models of oral consumption, reward and aversion.
Adult male C57BL/6 J mice voluntarily consumed oral nicotine, equivalent nicotine concentrations of fruit- and tobacco-flavored e-liquid, and equivalent dilutions of the nicotine-free versions in 2-bottle choice tests. Conditioned place preference and place aversion were assessed with peripherally administered e-liquids or nicotine. Serum nicotine and cotinine levels were measured after subcutaneous injections of e-liquid or nicotine.
Mice showed higher consumption and preference for the fruit-flavored e-liquid compared with nicotine alone. This increase was not due to the flavor itself as consumption of the nicotine-free fruit-flavored e-liquid was not elevated until the highest concentration tested. The increased consumption and preference were not observed with the tobacco-flavored e-liquid. The conditioned place preference, place aversion and nicotine pharmacokinetics of the fruit-flavored e-liquid were not significantly different from nicotine alone.
Our data suggest that fruit, but not tobacco flavor, increased the oral consumption of e-liquid compared with nicotine alone. Moreover, this enhancement was not due to increased consumption of the flavor itself, altered rewarding or aversive properties after peripheral administration, or altered pharmacokinetics. This flavor-specific enhancement suggests that some flavors may lead to higher nicotine intake and increased use of e-liquids compared with nicotine alone.</description><subject>Abuse</subject><subject>Animal models</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aversion</subject><subject>Aversive</subject><subject>Choice Behavior - drug effects</subject><subject>Choice Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Cigarettes</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Cotinine</subject><subject>Cotinine levels</subject><subject>Electronic cigarette</subject><subject>Electronic cigarettes</subject><subject>Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems</subject><subject>Equivalence</subject><subject>Flavor</subject><subject>Flavoring Agents - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Flavors</subject><subject>Fruit</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Liability</subject><subject>Liquids</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Mice, Inbred C57BL</subject><subject>Nicotiana</subject><subject>Nicotine</subject><subject>Nicotine - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Pharmacology</subject><subject>Place preference conditioning</subject><subject>preference</subject><subject>Reinforcement</subject><subject>Serum</subject><subject>Smoking</subject><subject>Taste - drug effects</subject><subject>Taste - physiology</subject><subject>Tobacco</subject><issn>0376-8716</issn><issn>1879-0046</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUU1v1DAQtRCIbgt_AVninMUfSWxfkKBqS6VKvZQjshx7vPUqsVM7WYl_j1dbCpzwZSTPe2_ezEMIU7KlhPaf9luX150ZrYN5ywg7fgululdoQ6VQDSFt_xptCBd9IwXtz9B5KXtSX6_IW3TGGe_aTpIN-nE9mkPKTZnBBh8shvhoooUJ4oKTxzCCXXKKtWPDzmRYFsBjeFqDwzbFsk7zElLEJjo8Z_CQobJxiHgKFt6hN96MBd4_1wv0_frq4fJbc3d_c3v55a6xHRFLo_xAO8X7jnolpOuHFrgcmGuJE15x71Qtg3MgPVPMCyWBqtYYYT1RFcMv0OeT7rwOEzhbzWcz6jmHyeSfOpmg_-3E8Kh36aAFZ5IpXgU-Pgvk9LRCWfQ-rTlWz5q1LVPVGukrSp5QNqdS6rYvEyjRx2D0Xv8JRh-D0adgKvXD3w5fiL-TqICvJwDUOx0CZF1sON7ShVwj0C6F_0_5Bdl0pww</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>Wong, A.L.</creator><creator>McElroy, S.M.</creator><creator>Robinson, J.M.</creator><creator>Mulloy, S.M.</creator><creator>El Banna, F.K.</creator><creator>Harris, A.C.</creator><creator>LeSage, M.G.</creator><creator>Lee, A.M.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>Flavor-specific enhancement of electronic cigarette liquid consumption and preference in mice</title><author>Wong, A.L. ; McElroy, S.M. ; Robinson, J.M. ; Mulloy, S.M. ; El Banna, F.K. ; Harris, A.C. ; LeSage, M.G. ; Lee, A.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-9fb1593651f978d6b4e38b2d40d7f93fd97f9bdde8f292f798e194aa7cf090d73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Abuse</topic><topic>Animal models</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aversion</topic><topic>Aversive</topic><topic>Choice Behavior - drug effects</topic><topic>Choice Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Cigarettes</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Cotinine</topic><topic>Cotinine levels</topic><topic>Electronic cigarette</topic><topic>Electronic cigarettes</topic><topic>Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems</topic><topic>Equivalence</topic><topic>Flavor</topic><topic>Flavoring Agents - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Flavors</topic><topic>Fruit</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Liability</topic><topic>Liquids</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Mice, Inbred C57BL</topic><topic>Nicotiana</topic><topic>Nicotine</topic><topic>Nicotine - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Pharmacology</topic><topic>Place preference conditioning</topic><topic>preference</topic><topic>Reinforcement</topic><topic>Serum</topic><topic>Smoking</topic><topic>Taste - drug effects</topic><topic>Taste - physiology</topic><topic>Tobacco</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wong, A.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McElroy, S.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulloy, S.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El Banna, F.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, A.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LeSage, M.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, A.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Drug and alcohol dependence</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wong, A.L.</au><au>McElroy, S.M.</au><au>Robinson, J.M.</au><au>Mulloy, S.M.</au><au>El Banna, F.K.</au><au>Harris, A.C.</au><au>LeSage, M.G.</au><au>Lee, A.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Flavor-specific enhancement of electronic cigarette liquid consumption and preference in mice</atitle><jtitle>Drug and alcohol dependence</jtitle><addtitle>Drug Alcohol Depend</addtitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>211</volume><spage>107995</spage><epage>107995</epage><pages>107995-107995</pages><artnum>107995</artnum><issn>0376-8716</issn><eissn>1879-0046</eissn><abstract>•Fruit flavor, but not tobacco flavor, enhances e-liquid consumption and preference.•The nicotine-free flavored e-liquid is not preferred over nicotine alone.•Conditioning rewarding and aversive effects are equal between nicotine and e-liquid.
The use of electronic cigarettes has increased over the past decade. To determine how the abuse liability of electronic cigarette liquids (e-liquids) differs from nicotine alone, and to determine the impact of flavor, we compared nicotine-containing fruit- and tobacco-flavored e-liquids, and their nicotine-free versions, to nicotine alone in mouse models of oral consumption, reward and aversion.
Adult male C57BL/6 J mice voluntarily consumed oral nicotine, equivalent nicotine concentrations of fruit- and tobacco-flavored e-liquid, and equivalent dilutions of the nicotine-free versions in 2-bottle choice tests. Conditioned place preference and place aversion were assessed with peripherally administered e-liquids or nicotine. Serum nicotine and cotinine levels were measured after subcutaneous injections of e-liquid or nicotine.
Mice showed higher consumption and preference for the fruit-flavored e-liquid compared with nicotine alone. This increase was not due to the flavor itself as consumption of the nicotine-free fruit-flavored e-liquid was not elevated until the highest concentration tested. The increased consumption and preference were not observed with the tobacco-flavored e-liquid. The conditioned place preference, place aversion and nicotine pharmacokinetics of the fruit-flavored e-liquid were not significantly different from nicotine alone.
Our data suggest that fruit, but not tobacco flavor, increased the oral consumption of e-liquid compared with nicotine alone. Moreover, this enhancement was not due to increased consumption of the flavor itself, altered rewarding or aversive properties after peripheral administration, or altered pharmacokinetics. This flavor-specific enhancement suggests that some flavors may lead to higher nicotine intake and increased use of e-liquids compared with nicotine alone.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>32354580</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.107995</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0376-8716 |
ispartof | Drug and alcohol dependence, 2020-06, Vol.211, p.107995-107995, Article 107995 |
issn | 0376-8716 1879-0046 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7328293 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Abuse Animal models Animals Aversion Aversive Choice Behavior - drug effects Choice Behavior - physiology Cigarettes Consumption Cotinine Cotinine levels Electronic cigarette Electronic cigarettes Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems Equivalence Flavor Flavoring Agents - administration & dosage Flavors Fruit Fruits Liability Liquids Male Mice Mice, Inbred C57BL Nicotiana Nicotine Nicotine - administration & dosage Pharmacokinetics Pharmacology Place preference conditioning preference Reinforcement Serum Smoking Taste - drug effects Taste - physiology Tobacco |
title | Flavor-specific enhancement of electronic cigarette liquid consumption and preference in mice |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T10%3A48%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Flavor-specific%20enhancement%20of%20electronic%20cigarette%20liquid%20consumption%20and%20preference%20in%20mice&rft.jtitle=Drug%20and%20alcohol%20dependence&rft.au=Wong,%20A.L.&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=211&rft.spage=107995&rft.epage=107995&rft.pages=107995-107995&rft.artnum=107995&rft.issn=0376-8716&rft.eissn=1879-0046&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.107995&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2442965106%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2442965106&rft_id=info:pmid/32354580&rft_els_id=S0376871620301605&rfr_iscdi=true |