Prenatal Substance Use and Perceptions of Parent and Partner Use Using the 4P’s Plus Screener

Background Prenatal substance use screening is recommended. The 4 P’s Plus screener includes questions on perceived problematic substance use in parents and partner that are not considered in risk stratification. Objectives This research examined the: (1) prevalence of self-reported problematic pare...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Maternal and child health journal 2019-02, Vol.23 (2), p.250-257
Hauptverfasser: Oga, Emmanuel. A., Peters, Erica. N., Mark, Katrina, Trocin, Kathleen, Coleman-Cowger, Victoria. H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 257
container_issue 2
container_start_page 250
container_title Maternal and child health journal
container_volume 23
creator Oga, Emmanuel. A.
Peters, Erica. N.
Mark, Katrina
Trocin, Kathleen
Coleman-Cowger, Victoria. H.
description Background Prenatal substance use screening is recommended. The 4 P’s Plus screener includes questions on perceived problematic substance use in parents and partner that are not considered in risk stratification. Objectives This research examined the: (1) prevalence of self-reported problematic parental and partner substance use and associations with biochemically-verified prenatal substance use; (2) utility of self-reported perceptions of parent/partner substance use as proxies for prenatal substance use; and (3) degree to which the sensitivity of the 4P’s Plus can be augmented with consideration of parent/partner questions in risk stratification. Methods A convenience sample of 500 pregnant women was recruited between January 2017 and January 2018. Participants completed the 4P’s Plus and provided urine for drug testing. Diagnostic utility of problematic parent/partner substance use questions was assessed, then compared to the 4P’s Plus used as designed, and to the 4P’s Plus used with these 2 questions included in risk stratification. Results Half (51%) of respondents reported either partner or parental problematic substance use. When partner or parent problematic substance use were considered as proxies for prenatal substance use, sensitivity was 65% and specificity was 55%. When used as intended, sensitivity was 94% and specificity was 29%. Including partner/parent questions increased sensitivity to 96% but lowered specificity (19%). Partner substance use and combined partner/parent use were associated with prenatal substance use [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 2.0 (1.2, 2.4; p = 0.006); aOR = 1.6 (1.1, 2.5, p = 0.04)]. Conclusions for Practice Sensitivity of the 4P’s Plus may improve with inclusion of self-reported problematic partner/parent substance use items in risk stratification.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10995-018-2647-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7325307</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A575250159</galeid><sourcerecordid>A575250159</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c606t-3f7a9f5483c1aee34cbece25eb9680ef2ae38b23042671a9d794b407fa9debf33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1ks1q3DAUhUVpadJpH6CbYiiUbpzq17I3hRD6B4EOpLMWsubK46CRppId6C6vkdfrk1SO0yRTpmghofudI-nqIPSa4BOCsfyQCG4aUWJSl7TisqRP0DERkpVVReuneY0bWspaiiP0IqVLjLMK8-foiGFBGa_5MVLLCF4P2hUXY5sG7Q0UqwSF9utiCdHAbuiDT0WwxVJndJgrOg4e4i25Sr3vimEDBV_-vr5JxdKNqbgwESAjL9Ezq12CV3fzAq0-f_px9rU8__7l29npeWkqXA0ls1I3VvCaGaIBGDctGKAC2qaqMViqgdUtZZjTShLdrGXDW46lzUtoLWML9HH23Y3tFtYm3zRqp3ax3-r4SwXdq_2K7zeqC1dKMioYltng_Z1BDD9HSIPa9smAc9pDGJOiRIiG4ZpOZ739B70MY_T5eROFG1ZjTh6oTjtQvbchn2smU3UqpKACk2y4QOUBqptap13wYPu8vcefHODzWMO2NwcF7x4JNqDdsEnBjbffug-SGTQxpBTB3jePYDXFTc1xUzluaoqbolnz5nHX7xV_85UBOgMpl3wH8aFV_3f9A-Hn3m4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2150938041</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prenatal Substance Use and Perceptions of Parent and Partner Use Using the 4P’s Plus Screener</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Oga, Emmanuel. A. ; Peters, Erica. N. ; Mark, Katrina ; Trocin, Kathleen ; Coleman-Cowger, Victoria. H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Oga, Emmanuel. A. ; Peters, Erica. N. ; Mark, Katrina ; Trocin, Kathleen ; Coleman-Cowger, Victoria. H.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Prenatal substance use screening is recommended. The 4 P’s Plus screener includes questions on perceived problematic substance use in parents and partner that are not considered in risk stratification. Objectives This research examined the: (1) prevalence of self-reported problematic parental and partner substance use and associations with biochemically-verified prenatal substance use; (2) utility of self-reported perceptions of parent/partner substance use as proxies for prenatal substance use; and (3) degree to which the sensitivity of the 4P’s Plus can be augmented with consideration of parent/partner questions in risk stratification. Methods A convenience sample of 500 pregnant women was recruited between January 2017 and January 2018. Participants completed the 4P’s Plus and provided urine for drug testing. Diagnostic utility of problematic parent/partner substance use questions was assessed, then compared to the 4P’s Plus used as designed, and to the 4P’s Plus used with these 2 questions included in risk stratification. Results Half (51%) of respondents reported either partner or parental problematic substance use. When partner or parent problematic substance use were considered as proxies for prenatal substance use, sensitivity was 65% and specificity was 55%. When used as intended, sensitivity was 94% and specificity was 29%. Including partner/parent questions increased sensitivity to 96% but lowered specificity (19%). Partner substance use and combined partner/parent use were associated with prenatal substance use [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 2.0 (1.2, 2.4; p = 0.006); aOR = 1.6 (1.1, 2.5, p = 0.04)]. Conclusions for Practice Sensitivity of the 4P’s Plus may improve with inclusion of self-reported problematic partner/parent substance use items in risk stratification.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1092-7875</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-6628</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10995-018-2647-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30523484</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Drug testing ; Drug use ; Gynecology ; Health screening ; Maternal &amp; child health ; Maternal and Child Health ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Methods ; Parents &amp; parenting ; Pediatrics ; Population Economics ; Pregnancy ; Prevention ; Public Health ; Risk factors ; Sociology ; Substance abuse ; Substance use</subject><ispartof>Maternal and child health journal, 2019-02, Vol.23 (2), p.250-257</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Springer</rights><rights>Maternal and Child Health Journal is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c606t-3f7a9f5483c1aee34cbece25eb9680ef2ae38b23042671a9d794b407fa9debf33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c606t-3f7a9f5483c1aee34cbece25eb9680ef2ae38b23042671a9d794b407fa9debf33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0744-5681</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10995-018-2647-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10995-018-2647-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30523484$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oga, Emmanuel. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peters, Erica. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mark, Katrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trocin, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coleman-Cowger, Victoria. H.</creatorcontrib><title>Prenatal Substance Use and Perceptions of Parent and Partner Use Using the 4P’s Plus Screener</title><title>Maternal and child health journal</title><addtitle>Matern Child Health J</addtitle><addtitle>Matern Child Health J</addtitle><description>Background Prenatal substance use screening is recommended. The 4 P’s Plus screener includes questions on perceived problematic substance use in parents and partner that are not considered in risk stratification. Objectives This research examined the: (1) prevalence of self-reported problematic parental and partner substance use and associations with biochemically-verified prenatal substance use; (2) utility of self-reported perceptions of parent/partner substance use as proxies for prenatal substance use; and (3) degree to which the sensitivity of the 4P’s Plus can be augmented with consideration of parent/partner questions in risk stratification. Methods A convenience sample of 500 pregnant women was recruited between January 2017 and January 2018. Participants completed the 4P’s Plus and provided urine for drug testing. Diagnostic utility of problematic parent/partner substance use questions was assessed, then compared to the 4P’s Plus used as designed, and to the 4P’s Plus used with these 2 questions included in risk stratification. Results Half (51%) of respondents reported either partner or parental problematic substance use. When partner or parent problematic substance use were considered as proxies for prenatal substance use, sensitivity was 65% and specificity was 55%. When used as intended, sensitivity was 94% and specificity was 29%. Including partner/parent questions increased sensitivity to 96% but lowered specificity (19%). Partner substance use and combined partner/parent use were associated with prenatal substance use [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 2.0 (1.2, 2.4; p = 0.006); aOR = 1.6 (1.1, 2.5, p = 0.04)]. Conclusions for Practice Sensitivity of the 4P’s Plus may improve with inclusion of self-reported problematic partner/parent substance use items in risk stratification.</description><subject>Drug testing</subject><subject>Drug use</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Health screening</subject><subject>Maternal &amp; child health</subject><subject>Maternal and Child Health</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Parents &amp; parenting</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Population Economics</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Substance abuse</subject><subject>Substance use</subject><issn>1092-7875</issn><issn>1573-6628</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1ks1q3DAUhUVpadJpH6CbYiiUbpzq17I3hRD6B4EOpLMWsubK46CRppId6C6vkdfrk1SO0yRTpmghofudI-nqIPSa4BOCsfyQCG4aUWJSl7TisqRP0DERkpVVReuneY0bWspaiiP0IqVLjLMK8-foiGFBGa_5MVLLCF4P2hUXY5sG7Q0UqwSF9utiCdHAbuiDT0WwxVJndJgrOg4e4i25Sr3vimEDBV_-vr5JxdKNqbgwESAjL9Ezq12CV3fzAq0-f_px9rU8__7l29npeWkqXA0ls1I3VvCaGaIBGDctGKAC2qaqMViqgdUtZZjTShLdrGXDW46lzUtoLWML9HH23Y3tFtYm3zRqp3ax3-r4SwXdq_2K7zeqC1dKMioYltng_Z1BDD9HSIPa9smAc9pDGJOiRIiG4ZpOZ739B70MY_T5eROFG1ZjTh6oTjtQvbchn2smU3UqpKACk2y4QOUBqptap13wYPu8vcefHODzWMO2NwcF7x4JNqDdsEnBjbffug-SGTQxpBTB3jePYDXFTc1xUzluaoqbolnz5nHX7xV_85UBOgMpl3wH8aFV_3f9A-Hn3m4</recordid><startdate>20190201</startdate><enddate>20190201</enddate><creator>Oga, Emmanuel. A.</creator><creator>Peters, Erica. N.</creator><creator>Mark, Katrina</creator><creator>Trocin, Kathleen</creator><creator>Coleman-Cowger, Victoria. H.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0744-5681</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190201</creationdate><title>Prenatal Substance Use and Perceptions of Parent and Partner Use Using the 4P’s Plus Screener</title><author>Oga, Emmanuel. A. ; Peters, Erica. N. ; Mark, Katrina ; Trocin, Kathleen ; Coleman-Cowger, Victoria. H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c606t-3f7a9f5483c1aee34cbece25eb9680ef2ae38b23042671a9d794b407fa9debf33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Drug testing</topic><topic>Drug use</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Health screening</topic><topic>Maternal &amp; child health</topic><topic>Maternal and Child Health</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Parents &amp; parenting</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Population Economics</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Substance abuse</topic><topic>Substance use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oga, Emmanuel. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peters, Erica. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mark, Katrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trocin, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coleman-Cowger, Victoria. H.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Maternal and child health journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oga, Emmanuel. A.</au><au>Peters, Erica. N.</au><au>Mark, Katrina</au><au>Trocin, Kathleen</au><au>Coleman-Cowger, Victoria. H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prenatal Substance Use and Perceptions of Parent and Partner Use Using the 4P’s Plus Screener</atitle><jtitle>Maternal and child health journal</jtitle><stitle>Matern Child Health J</stitle><addtitle>Matern Child Health J</addtitle><date>2019-02-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>250</spage><epage>257</epage><pages>250-257</pages><issn>1092-7875</issn><eissn>1573-6628</eissn><abstract>Background Prenatal substance use screening is recommended. The 4 P’s Plus screener includes questions on perceived problematic substance use in parents and partner that are not considered in risk stratification. Objectives This research examined the: (1) prevalence of self-reported problematic parental and partner substance use and associations with biochemically-verified prenatal substance use; (2) utility of self-reported perceptions of parent/partner substance use as proxies for prenatal substance use; and (3) degree to which the sensitivity of the 4P’s Plus can be augmented with consideration of parent/partner questions in risk stratification. Methods A convenience sample of 500 pregnant women was recruited between January 2017 and January 2018. Participants completed the 4P’s Plus and provided urine for drug testing. Diagnostic utility of problematic parent/partner substance use questions was assessed, then compared to the 4P’s Plus used as designed, and to the 4P’s Plus used with these 2 questions included in risk stratification. Results Half (51%) of respondents reported either partner or parental problematic substance use. When partner or parent problematic substance use were considered as proxies for prenatal substance use, sensitivity was 65% and specificity was 55%. When used as intended, sensitivity was 94% and specificity was 29%. Including partner/parent questions increased sensitivity to 96% but lowered specificity (19%). Partner substance use and combined partner/parent use were associated with prenatal substance use [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 2.0 (1.2, 2.4; p = 0.006); aOR = 1.6 (1.1, 2.5, p = 0.04)]. Conclusions for Practice Sensitivity of the 4P’s Plus may improve with inclusion of self-reported problematic partner/parent substance use items in risk stratification.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>30523484</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10995-018-2647-2</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0744-5681</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1092-7875
ispartof Maternal and child health journal, 2019-02, Vol.23 (2), p.250-257
issn 1092-7875
1573-6628
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7325307
source SpringerNature Journals
subjects Drug testing
Drug use
Gynecology
Health screening
Maternal & child health
Maternal and Child Health
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Methods
Parents & parenting
Pediatrics
Population Economics
Pregnancy
Prevention
Public Health
Risk factors
Sociology
Substance abuse
Substance use
title Prenatal Substance Use and Perceptions of Parent and Partner Use Using the 4P’s Plus Screener
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T17%3A27%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prenatal%20Substance%20Use%20and%20Perceptions%20of%20Parent%20and%20Partner%20Use%20Using%20the%204P%E2%80%99s%20Plus%20Screener&rft.jtitle=Maternal%20and%20child%20health%20journal&rft.au=Oga,%20Emmanuel.%20A.&rft.date=2019-02-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=250&rft.epage=257&rft.pages=250-257&rft.issn=1092-7875&rft.eissn=1573-6628&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10995-018-2647-2&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA575250159%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2150938041&rft_id=info:pmid/30523484&rft_galeid=A575250159&rfr_iscdi=true