Prenatal Substance Use and Perceptions of Parent and Partner Use Using the 4P’s Plus Screener
Background Prenatal substance use screening is recommended. The 4 P’s Plus screener includes questions on perceived problematic substance use in parents and partner that are not considered in risk stratification. Objectives This research examined the: (1) prevalence of self-reported problematic pare...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Maternal and child health journal 2019-02, Vol.23 (2), p.250-257 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 257 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 250 |
container_title | Maternal and child health journal |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Oga, Emmanuel. A. Peters, Erica. N. Mark, Katrina Trocin, Kathleen Coleman-Cowger, Victoria. H. |
description | Background
Prenatal substance use screening is recommended. The 4 P’s Plus screener includes questions on perceived problematic substance use in parents and partner that are not considered in risk stratification.
Objectives
This research examined the: (1) prevalence of self-reported problematic parental and partner substance use and associations with biochemically-verified prenatal substance use; (2) utility of self-reported perceptions of parent/partner substance use as proxies for prenatal substance use; and (3) degree to which the sensitivity of the 4P’s Plus can be augmented with consideration of parent/partner questions in risk stratification.
Methods
A convenience sample of 500 pregnant women was recruited between January 2017 and January 2018. Participants completed the 4P’s Plus and provided urine for drug testing. Diagnostic utility of problematic parent/partner substance use questions was assessed, then compared to the 4P’s Plus used as designed, and to the 4P’s Plus used with these 2 questions included in risk stratification.
Results
Half (51%) of respondents reported either partner or parental problematic substance use. When partner or parent problematic substance use were considered as proxies for prenatal substance use, sensitivity was 65% and specificity was 55%. When used as intended, sensitivity was 94% and specificity was 29%. Including partner/parent questions increased sensitivity to 96% but lowered specificity (19%). Partner substance use and combined partner/parent use were associated with prenatal substance use [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 2.0 (1.2, 2.4; p = 0.006); aOR = 1.6 (1.1, 2.5, p = 0.04)].
Conclusions for Practice
Sensitivity of the 4P’s Plus may improve with inclusion of self-reported problematic partner/parent substance use items in risk stratification. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10995-018-2647-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7325307</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A575250159</galeid><sourcerecordid>A575250159</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c606t-3f7a9f5483c1aee34cbece25eb9680ef2ae38b23042671a9d794b407fa9debf33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1ks1q3DAUhUVpadJpH6CbYiiUbpzq17I3hRD6B4EOpLMWsubK46CRppId6C6vkdfrk1SO0yRTpmghofudI-nqIPSa4BOCsfyQCG4aUWJSl7TisqRP0DERkpVVReuneY0bWspaiiP0IqVLjLMK8-foiGFBGa_5MVLLCF4P2hUXY5sG7Q0UqwSF9utiCdHAbuiDT0WwxVJndJgrOg4e4i25Sr3vimEDBV_-vr5JxdKNqbgwESAjL9Ezq12CV3fzAq0-f_px9rU8__7l29npeWkqXA0ls1I3VvCaGaIBGDctGKAC2qaqMViqgdUtZZjTShLdrGXDW46lzUtoLWML9HH23Y3tFtYm3zRqp3ax3-r4SwXdq_2K7zeqC1dKMioYltng_Z1BDD9HSIPa9smAc9pDGJOiRIiG4ZpOZ739B70MY_T5eROFG1ZjTh6oTjtQvbchn2smU3UqpKACk2y4QOUBqptap13wYPu8vcefHODzWMO2NwcF7x4JNqDdsEnBjbffug-SGTQxpBTB3jePYDXFTc1xUzluaoqbolnz5nHX7xV_85UBOgMpl3wH8aFV_3f9A-Hn3m4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2150938041</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prenatal Substance Use and Perceptions of Parent and Partner Use Using the 4P’s Plus Screener</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Oga, Emmanuel. A. ; Peters, Erica. N. ; Mark, Katrina ; Trocin, Kathleen ; Coleman-Cowger, Victoria. H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Oga, Emmanuel. A. ; Peters, Erica. N. ; Mark, Katrina ; Trocin, Kathleen ; Coleman-Cowger, Victoria. H.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Prenatal substance use screening is recommended. The 4 P’s Plus screener includes questions on perceived problematic substance use in parents and partner that are not considered in risk stratification.
Objectives
This research examined the: (1) prevalence of self-reported problematic parental and partner substance use and associations with biochemically-verified prenatal substance use; (2) utility of self-reported perceptions of parent/partner substance use as proxies for prenatal substance use; and (3) degree to which the sensitivity of the 4P’s Plus can be augmented with consideration of parent/partner questions in risk stratification.
Methods
A convenience sample of 500 pregnant women was recruited between January 2017 and January 2018. Participants completed the 4P’s Plus and provided urine for drug testing. Diagnostic utility of problematic parent/partner substance use questions was assessed, then compared to the 4P’s Plus used as designed, and to the 4P’s Plus used with these 2 questions included in risk stratification.
Results
Half (51%) of respondents reported either partner or parental problematic substance use. When partner or parent problematic substance use were considered as proxies for prenatal substance use, sensitivity was 65% and specificity was 55%. When used as intended, sensitivity was 94% and specificity was 29%. Including partner/parent questions increased sensitivity to 96% but lowered specificity (19%). Partner substance use and combined partner/parent use were associated with prenatal substance use [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 2.0 (1.2, 2.4; p = 0.006); aOR = 1.6 (1.1, 2.5, p = 0.04)].
Conclusions for Practice
Sensitivity of the 4P’s Plus may improve with inclusion of self-reported problematic partner/parent substance use items in risk stratification.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1092-7875</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-6628</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10995-018-2647-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30523484</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Drug testing ; Drug use ; Gynecology ; Health screening ; Maternal & child health ; Maternal and Child Health ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Methods ; Parents & parenting ; Pediatrics ; Population Economics ; Pregnancy ; Prevention ; Public Health ; Risk factors ; Sociology ; Substance abuse ; Substance use</subject><ispartof>Maternal and child health journal, 2019-02, Vol.23 (2), p.250-257</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Springer</rights><rights>Maternal and Child Health Journal is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c606t-3f7a9f5483c1aee34cbece25eb9680ef2ae38b23042671a9d794b407fa9debf33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c606t-3f7a9f5483c1aee34cbece25eb9680ef2ae38b23042671a9d794b407fa9debf33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0744-5681</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10995-018-2647-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10995-018-2647-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30523484$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oga, Emmanuel. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peters, Erica. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mark, Katrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trocin, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coleman-Cowger, Victoria. H.</creatorcontrib><title>Prenatal Substance Use and Perceptions of Parent and Partner Use Using the 4P’s Plus Screener</title><title>Maternal and child health journal</title><addtitle>Matern Child Health J</addtitle><addtitle>Matern Child Health J</addtitle><description>Background
Prenatal substance use screening is recommended. The 4 P’s Plus screener includes questions on perceived problematic substance use in parents and partner that are not considered in risk stratification.
Objectives
This research examined the: (1) prevalence of self-reported problematic parental and partner substance use and associations with biochemically-verified prenatal substance use; (2) utility of self-reported perceptions of parent/partner substance use as proxies for prenatal substance use; and (3) degree to which the sensitivity of the 4P’s Plus can be augmented with consideration of parent/partner questions in risk stratification.
Methods
A convenience sample of 500 pregnant women was recruited between January 2017 and January 2018. Participants completed the 4P’s Plus and provided urine for drug testing. Diagnostic utility of problematic parent/partner substance use questions was assessed, then compared to the 4P’s Plus used as designed, and to the 4P’s Plus used with these 2 questions included in risk stratification.
Results
Half (51%) of respondents reported either partner or parental problematic substance use. When partner or parent problematic substance use were considered as proxies for prenatal substance use, sensitivity was 65% and specificity was 55%. When used as intended, sensitivity was 94% and specificity was 29%. Including partner/parent questions increased sensitivity to 96% but lowered specificity (19%). Partner substance use and combined partner/parent use were associated with prenatal substance use [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 2.0 (1.2, 2.4; p = 0.006); aOR = 1.6 (1.1, 2.5, p = 0.04)].
Conclusions for Practice
Sensitivity of the 4P’s Plus may improve with inclusion of self-reported problematic partner/parent substance use items in risk stratification.</description><subject>Drug testing</subject><subject>Drug use</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Health screening</subject><subject>Maternal & child health</subject><subject>Maternal and Child Health</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Parents & parenting</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Population Economics</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Substance abuse</subject><subject>Substance use</subject><issn>1092-7875</issn><issn>1573-6628</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1ks1q3DAUhUVpadJpH6CbYiiUbpzq17I3hRD6B4EOpLMWsubK46CRppId6C6vkdfrk1SO0yRTpmghofudI-nqIPSa4BOCsfyQCG4aUWJSl7TisqRP0DERkpVVReuneY0bWspaiiP0IqVLjLMK8-foiGFBGa_5MVLLCF4P2hUXY5sG7Q0UqwSF9utiCdHAbuiDT0WwxVJndJgrOg4e4i25Sr3vimEDBV_-vr5JxdKNqbgwESAjL9Ezq12CV3fzAq0-f_px9rU8__7l29npeWkqXA0ls1I3VvCaGaIBGDctGKAC2qaqMViqgdUtZZjTShLdrGXDW46lzUtoLWML9HH23Y3tFtYm3zRqp3ax3-r4SwXdq_2K7zeqC1dKMioYltng_Z1BDD9HSIPa9smAc9pDGJOiRIiG4ZpOZ739B70MY_T5eROFG1ZjTh6oTjtQvbchn2smU3UqpKACk2y4QOUBqptap13wYPu8vcefHODzWMO2NwcF7x4JNqDdsEnBjbffug-SGTQxpBTB3jePYDXFTc1xUzluaoqbolnz5nHX7xV_85UBOgMpl3wH8aFV_3f9A-Hn3m4</recordid><startdate>20190201</startdate><enddate>20190201</enddate><creator>Oga, Emmanuel. A.</creator><creator>Peters, Erica. N.</creator><creator>Mark, Katrina</creator><creator>Trocin, Kathleen</creator><creator>Coleman-Cowger, Victoria. H.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0744-5681</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190201</creationdate><title>Prenatal Substance Use and Perceptions of Parent and Partner Use Using the 4P’s Plus Screener</title><author>Oga, Emmanuel. A. ; Peters, Erica. N. ; Mark, Katrina ; Trocin, Kathleen ; Coleman-Cowger, Victoria. H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c606t-3f7a9f5483c1aee34cbece25eb9680ef2ae38b23042671a9d794b407fa9debf33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Drug testing</topic><topic>Drug use</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Health screening</topic><topic>Maternal & child health</topic><topic>Maternal and Child Health</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Parents & parenting</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Population Economics</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Substance abuse</topic><topic>Substance use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oga, Emmanuel. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peters, Erica. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mark, Katrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trocin, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coleman-Cowger, Victoria. H.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Maternal and child health journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oga, Emmanuel. A.</au><au>Peters, Erica. N.</au><au>Mark, Katrina</au><au>Trocin, Kathleen</au><au>Coleman-Cowger, Victoria. H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prenatal Substance Use and Perceptions of Parent and Partner Use Using the 4P’s Plus Screener</atitle><jtitle>Maternal and child health journal</jtitle><stitle>Matern Child Health J</stitle><addtitle>Matern Child Health J</addtitle><date>2019-02-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>250</spage><epage>257</epage><pages>250-257</pages><issn>1092-7875</issn><eissn>1573-6628</eissn><abstract>Background
Prenatal substance use screening is recommended. The 4 P’s Plus screener includes questions on perceived problematic substance use in parents and partner that are not considered in risk stratification.
Objectives
This research examined the: (1) prevalence of self-reported problematic parental and partner substance use and associations with biochemically-verified prenatal substance use; (2) utility of self-reported perceptions of parent/partner substance use as proxies for prenatal substance use; and (3) degree to which the sensitivity of the 4P’s Plus can be augmented with consideration of parent/partner questions in risk stratification.
Methods
A convenience sample of 500 pregnant women was recruited between January 2017 and January 2018. Participants completed the 4P’s Plus and provided urine for drug testing. Diagnostic utility of problematic parent/partner substance use questions was assessed, then compared to the 4P’s Plus used as designed, and to the 4P’s Plus used with these 2 questions included in risk stratification.
Results
Half (51%) of respondents reported either partner or parental problematic substance use. When partner or parent problematic substance use were considered as proxies for prenatal substance use, sensitivity was 65% and specificity was 55%. When used as intended, sensitivity was 94% and specificity was 29%. Including partner/parent questions increased sensitivity to 96% but lowered specificity (19%). Partner substance use and combined partner/parent use were associated with prenatal substance use [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 2.0 (1.2, 2.4; p = 0.006); aOR = 1.6 (1.1, 2.5, p = 0.04)].
Conclusions for Practice
Sensitivity of the 4P’s Plus may improve with inclusion of self-reported problematic partner/parent substance use items in risk stratification.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>30523484</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10995-018-2647-2</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0744-5681</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1092-7875 |
ispartof | Maternal and child health journal, 2019-02, Vol.23 (2), p.250-257 |
issn | 1092-7875 1573-6628 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7325307 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Drug testing Drug use Gynecology Health screening Maternal & child health Maternal and Child Health Medicine Medicine & Public Health Methods Parents & parenting Pediatrics Population Economics Pregnancy Prevention Public Health Risk factors Sociology Substance abuse Substance use |
title | Prenatal Substance Use and Perceptions of Parent and Partner Use Using the 4P’s Plus Screener |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T17%3A27%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prenatal%20Substance%20Use%20and%20Perceptions%20of%20Parent%20and%20Partner%20Use%20Using%20the%204P%E2%80%99s%20Plus%20Screener&rft.jtitle=Maternal%20and%20child%20health%20journal&rft.au=Oga,%20Emmanuel.%20A.&rft.date=2019-02-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=250&rft.epage=257&rft.pages=250-257&rft.issn=1092-7875&rft.eissn=1573-6628&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10995-018-2647-2&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA575250159%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2150938041&rft_id=info:pmid/30523484&rft_galeid=A575250159&rfr_iscdi=true |