Quantitative sustainability assessment of household food waste management in the Amsterdam Metropolitan Area

•Multi-fold local & global data collected and processed into a comprehensive framework•Anaerobic digestion with effective nutrient recovery appears the best option•All alternative strategies to incineration increase food waste management costs•Aggregation makes findings accessible to the widest...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Resources, conservation and recycling conservation and recycling, 2020-09, Vol.160, p.104854-104854, Article 104854
Hauptverfasser: Tonini, Davide, Wandl, Alexander, Meister, Kozmo, Unceta, Pablo Muñoz, Taelman, Sue Ellen, Sanjuan-Delmás, David, Dewulf, Jo, Huygens, Dries
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 104854
container_issue
container_start_page 104854
container_title Resources, conservation and recycling
container_volume 160
creator Tonini, Davide
Wandl, Alexander
Meister, Kozmo
Unceta, Pablo Muñoz
Taelman, Sue Ellen
Sanjuan-Delmás, David
Dewulf, Jo
Huygens, Dries
description •Multi-fold local & global data collected and processed into a comprehensive framework•Anaerobic digestion with effective nutrient recovery appears the best option•All alternative strategies to incineration increase food waste management costs•Aggregation makes findings accessible to the widest possible audience and stakeholder•The study informs stakeholders and authorities on the consequences of their options Food waste represents the largest fraction of the municipal solid waste generated in Europe and its management is associated to suboptimal performance in environmental, health, and social dimensions. By processing detailed multi-fold local data as part of a comprehensive and broadly understandable sustainability framework, this study quantifies the environmental and socio-economic impacts of household food waste management in the Amsterdam Metropolitan Area based on priorities set by local stakeholders. Five alternative short-term management options have been assessed against the current system, relying on poor separate collection and incineration. Four options involve separate collection of food waste followed by biological treatments (home/centralised composting and anaerobic digestion) while one involves a mix of separate collection and centralised mechanical-biological treatment followed by anaerobic digestion. Among these, separate collection followed by anaerobic digestion coupled with effective nutrient and energy recovery is, according to our findings, the preferred option to improve the sustainability of the current system in all dimensions considered, except for the economic pillar due to the collection costs. Home and centralised composting as well as mechanical-biological treatment are associated to more adverse impacts based on our findings. The study informs local stakeholders and authorities on the potential consequences of their options, thereby allowing them to make sound choices for a future waste and circular economy strategy.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104854
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7323620</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0921344920301749</els_id><sourcerecordid>2440465234</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-ee1dfbb9df30b1167286bccacd497082ea6a8fc44a3b7bed86bb33bbfb473fab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkVuLFDEQhRtR3NnV32AeBekxt769CMOw6sKKCPocKunqnQzdyZikZ9l_b2Z7GPBJnxKqzjlV1FcU7xhdM8rqj_t1wGi8C2jWnPJTVbaVfFGsWNt0Ja2r9mWxoh1npZCyuyquY9xTSkXbidfFleBtK1nTrYrxxwwu2QTJHpHEOSawDrQdbXoiECPGOKFLxA9k5-eIOz_2ZPC-J48QE5IJHDzgs8Q6knZINlOuhx4m8g1T8Aefo8CRTUB4U7waYIz49vzeFL8-3_7cfi3vv3-5227uSyMrnkpE1g9ad_0gqGasbnhba2PA9LJraMsRamgHIyUI3Wjsc1cLofWgZSMG0OKm-LTkHmY9YW_ydgFGdQh2gvCkPFj1d8fZnXrwR9UILmpOc8D7c0Dwv2eMSU02GhxHcJivoLiUVNYVFzJLm0Vqgo8x4HAZw6g6sVJ7dWGlTqzUwio7PyzOR9R-iMaiM3hxZ1iVpDUT-UN5ldXt_6u3z0C92_rZpWzdLFbMNz9aDOps723eKane238u-we4VcYt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2440465234</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantitative sustainability assessment of household food waste management in the Amsterdam Metropolitan Area</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Tonini, Davide ; Wandl, Alexander ; Meister, Kozmo ; Unceta, Pablo Muñoz ; Taelman, Sue Ellen ; Sanjuan-Delmás, David ; Dewulf, Jo ; Huygens, Dries</creator><creatorcontrib>Tonini, Davide ; Wandl, Alexander ; Meister, Kozmo ; Unceta, Pablo Muñoz ; Taelman, Sue Ellen ; Sanjuan-Delmás, David ; Dewulf, Jo ; Huygens, Dries</creatorcontrib><description>•Multi-fold local &amp; global data collected and processed into a comprehensive framework•Anaerobic digestion with effective nutrient recovery appears the best option•All alternative strategies to incineration increase food waste management costs•Aggregation makes findings accessible to the widest possible audience and stakeholder•The study informs stakeholders and authorities on the consequences of their options Food waste represents the largest fraction of the municipal solid waste generated in Europe and its management is associated to suboptimal performance in environmental, health, and social dimensions. By processing detailed multi-fold local data as part of a comprehensive and broadly understandable sustainability framework, this study quantifies the environmental and socio-economic impacts of household food waste management in the Amsterdam Metropolitan Area based on priorities set by local stakeholders. Five alternative short-term management options have been assessed against the current system, relying on poor separate collection and incineration. Four options involve separate collection of food waste followed by biological treatments (home/centralised composting and anaerobic digestion) while one involves a mix of separate collection and centralised mechanical-biological treatment followed by anaerobic digestion. Among these, separate collection followed by anaerobic digestion coupled with effective nutrient and energy recovery is, according to our findings, the preferred option to improve the sustainability of the current system in all dimensions considered, except for the economic pillar due to the collection costs. Home and centralised composting as well as mechanical-biological treatment are associated to more adverse impacts based on our findings. The study informs local stakeholders and authorities on the potential consequences of their options, thereby allowing them to make sound choices for a future waste and circular economy strategy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-3449</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0658</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104854</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32884179</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>AMSTERDAM: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Circular Economy ; Engineering ; Engineering, Environmental ; Environmental Sciences ; Environmental Sciences &amp; Ecology ; LCA ; Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine ; Local impacts ; Multi-criteria decision analysis ; Science &amp; Technology ; Stakeholder ; Technology ; Waste collection</subject><ispartof>Resources, conservation and recycling, 2020-09, Vol.160, p.104854-104854, Article 104854</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors</rights><rights>2020 The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>48</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000540613000025</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-ee1dfbb9df30b1167286bccacd497082ea6a8fc44a3b7bed86bb33bbfb473fab3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-ee1dfbb9df30b1167286bccacd497082ea6a8fc44a3b7bed86bb33bbfb473fab3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1870-4930 ; 0000-0001-9693-6222 ; 0000-0003-2423-6926 ; 0000-0002-5238-2069</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104854$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tonini, Davide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wandl, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meister, Kozmo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Unceta, Pablo Muñoz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taelman, Sue Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanjuan-Delmás, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dewulf, Jo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huygens, Dries</creatorcontrib><title>Quantitative sustainability assessment of household food waste management in the Amsterdam Metropolitan Area</title><title>Resources, conservation and recycling</title><addtitle>RESOUR CONSERV RECY</addtitle><description>•Multi-fold local &amp; global data collected and processed into a comprehensive framework•Anaerobic digestion with effective nutrient recovery appears the best option•All alternative strategies to incineration increase food waste management costs•Aggregation makes findings accessible to the widest possible audience and stakeholder•The study informs stakeholders and authorities on the consequences of their options Food waste represents the largest fraction of the municipal solid waste generated in Europe and its management is associated to suboptimal performance in environmental, health, and social dimensions. By processing detailed multi-fold local data as part of a comprehensive and broadly understandable sustainability framework, this study quantifies the environmental and socio-economic impacts of household food waste management in the Amsterdam Metropolitan Area based on priorities set by local stakeholders. Five alternative short-term management options have been assessed against the current system, relying on poor separate collection and incineration. Four options involve separate collection of food waste followed by biological treatments (home/centralised composting and anaerobic digestion) while one involves a mix of separate collection and centralised mechanical-biological treatment followed by anaerobic digestion. Among these, separate collection followed by anaerobic digestion coupled with effective nutrient and energy recovery is, according to our findings, the preferred option to improve the sustainability of the current system in all dimensions considered, except for the economic pillar due to the collection costs. Home and centralised composting as well as mechanical-biological treatment are associated to more adverse impacts based on our findings. The study informs local stakeholders and authorities on the potential consequences of their options, thereby allowing them to make sound choices for a future waste and circular economy strategy.</description><subject>Circular Economy</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Engineering, Environmental</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences &amp; Ecology</subject><subject>LCA</subject><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</subject><subject>Local impacts</subject><subject>Multi-criteria decision analysis</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Stakeholder</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Waste collection</subject><issn>0921-3449</issn><issn>1879-0658</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AOWDO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkVuLFDEQhRtR3NnV32AeBekxt769CMOw6sKKCPocKunqnQzdyZikZ9l_b2Z7GPBJnxKqzjlV1FcU7xhdM8rqj_t1wGi8C2jWnPJTVbaVfFGsWNt0Ja2r9mWxoh1npZCyuyquY9xTSkXbidfFleBtK1nTrYrxxwwu2QTJHpHEOSawDrQdbXoiECPGOKFLxA9k5-eIOz_2ZPC-J48QE5IJHDzgs8Q6knZINlOuhx4m8g1T8Aefo8CRTUB4U7waYIz49vzeFL8-3_7cfi3vv3-5227uSyMrnkpE1g9ad_0gqGasbnhba2PA9LJraMsRamgHIyUI3Wjsc1cLofWgZSMG0OKm-LTkHmY9YW_ydgFGdQh2gvCkPFj1d8fZnXrwR9UILmpOc8D7c0Dwv2eMSU02GhxHcJivoLiUVNYVFzJLm0Vqgo8x4HAZw6g6sVJ7dWGlTqzUwio7PyzOR9R-iMaiM3hxZ1iVpDUT-UN5ldXt_6u3z0C92_rZpWzdLFbMNz9aDOps723eKane238u-we4VcYt</recordid><startdate>202009</startdate><enddate>202009</enddate><creator>Tonini, Davide</creator><creator>Wandl, Alexander</creator><creator>Meister, Kozmo</creator><creator>Unceta, Pablo Muñoz</creator><creator>Taelman, Sue Ellen</creator><creator>Sanjuan-Delmás, David</creator><creator>Dewulf, Jo</creator><creator>Huygens, Dries</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AOWDO</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1870-4930</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9693-6222</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2423-6926</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5238-2069</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202009</creationdate><title>Quantitative sustainability assessment of household food waste management in the Amsterdam Metropolitan Area</title><author>Tonini, Davide ; Wandl, Alexander ; Meister, Kozmo ; Unceta, Pablo Muñoz ; Taelman, Sue Ellen ; Sanjuan-Delmás, David ; Dewulf, Jo ; Huygens, Dries</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-ee1dfbb9df30b1167286bccacd497082ea6a8fc44a3b7bed86bb33bbfb473fab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Circular Economy</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Engineering, Environmental</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences &amp; Ecology</topic><topic>LCA</topic><topic>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</topic><topic>Local impacts</topic><topic>Multi-criteria decision analysis</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Stakeholder</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Waste collection</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tonini, Davide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wandl, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meister, Kozmo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Unceta, Pablo Muñoz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taelman, Sue Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanjuan-Delmás, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dewulf, Jo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huygens, Dries</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Resources, conservation and recycling</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tonini, Davide</au><au>Wandl, Alexander</au><au>Meister, Kozmo</au><au>Unceta, Pablo Muñoz</au><au>Taelman, Sue Ellen</au><au>Sanjuan-Delmás, David</au><au>Dewulf, Jo</au><au>Huygens, Dries</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantitative sustainability assessment of household food waste management in the Amsterdam Metropolitan Area</atitle><jtitle>Resources, conservation and recycling</jtitle><stitle>RESOUR CONSERV RECY</stitle><date>2020-09</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>160</volume><spage>104854</spage><epage>104854</epage><pages>104854-104854</pages><artnum>104854</artnum><issn>0921-3449</issn><eissn>1879-0658</eissn><abstract>•Multi-fold local &amp; global data collected and processed into a comprehensive framework•Anaerobic digestion with effective nutrient recovery appears the best option•All alternative strategies to incineration increase food waste management costs•Aggregation makes findings accessible to the widest possible audience and stakeholder•The study informs stakeholders and authorities on the consequences of their options Food waste represents the largest fraction of the municipal solid waste generated in Europe and its management is associated to suboptimal performance in environmental, health, and social dimensions. By processing detailed multi-fold local data as part of a comprehensive and broadly understandable sustainability framework, this study quantifies the environmental and socio-economic impacts of household food waste management in the Amsterdam Metropolitan Area based on priorities set by local stakeholders. Five alternative short-term management options have been assessed against the current system, relying on poor separate collection and incineration. Four options involve separate collection of food waste followed by biological treatments (home/centralised composting and anaerobic digestion) while one involves a mix of separate collection and centralised mechanical-biological treatment followed by anaerobic digestion. Among these, separate collection followed by anaerobic digestion coupled with effective nutrient and energy recovery is, according to our findings, the preferred option to improve the sustainability of the current system in all dimensions considered, except for the economic pillar due to the collection costs. Home and centralised composting as well as mechanical-biological treatment are associated to more adverse impacts based on our findings. The study informs local stakeholders and authorities on the potential consequences of their options, thereby allowing them to make sound choices for a future waste and circular economy strategy.</abstract><cop>AMSTERDAM</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>32884179</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104854</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1870-4930</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9693-6222</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2423-6926</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5238-2069</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0921-3449
ispartof Resources, conservation and recycling, 2020-09, Vol.160, p.104854-104854, Article 104854
issn 0921-3449
1879-0658
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7323620
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Circular Economy
Engineering
Engineering, Environmental
Environmental Sciences
Environmental Sciences & Ecology
LCA
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Local impacts
Multi-criteria decision analysis
Science & Technology
Stakeholder
Technology
Waste collection
title Quantitative sustainability assessment of household food waste management in the Amsterdam Metropolitan Area
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T23%3A33%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantitative%20sustainability%20assessment%20of%20household%20food%20waste%20management%20in%20the%20Amsterdam%20Metropolitan%20Area&rft.jtitle=Resources,%20conservation%20and%20recycling&rft.au=Tonini,%20Davide&rft.date=2020-09&rft.volume=160&rft.spage=104854&rft.epage=104854&rft.pages=104854-104854&rft.artnum=104854&rft.issn=0921-3449&rft.eissn=1879-0658&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104854&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_webof%3E2440465234%3C/proquest_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2440465234&rft_id=info:pmid/32884179&rft_els_id=S0921344920301749&rfr_iscdi=true