Quantitative sustainability assessment of household food waste management in the Amsterdam Metropolitan Area
•Multi-fold local & global data collected and processed into a comprehensive framework•Anaerobic digestion with effective nutrient recovery appears the best option•All alternative strategies to incineration increase food waste management costs•Aggregation makes findings accessible to the widest...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Resources, conservation and recycling conservation and recycling, 2020-09, Vol.160, p.104854-104854, Article 104854 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 104854 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 104854 |
container_title | Resources, conservation and recycling |
container_volume | 160 |
creator | Tonini, Davide Wandl, Alexander Meister, Kozmo Unceta, Pablo Muñoz Taelman, Sue Ellen Sanjuan-Delmás, David Dewulf, Jo Huygens, Dries |
description | •Multi-fold local & global data collected and processed into a comprehensive framework•Anaerobic digestion with effective nutrient recovery appears the best option•All alternative strategies to incineration increase food waste management costs•Aggregation makes findings accessible to the widest possible audience and stakeholder•The study informs stakeholders and authorities on the consequences of their options
Food waste represents the largest fraction of the municipal solid waste generated in Europe and its management is associated to suboptimal performance in environmental, health, and social dimensions. By processing detailed multi-fold local data as part of a comprehensive and broadly understandable sustainability framework, this study quantifies the environmental and socio-economic impacts of household food waste management in the Amsterdam Metropolitan Area based on priorities set by local stakeholders. Five alternative short-term management options have been assessed against the current system, relying on poor separate collection and incineration. Four options involve separate collection of food waste followed by biological treatments (home/centralised composting and anaerobic digestion) while one involves a mix of separate collection and centralised mechanical-biological treatment followed by anaerobic digestion. Among these, separate collection followed by anaerobic digestion coupled with effective nutrient and energy recovery is, according to our findings, the preferred option to improve the sustainability of the current system in all dimensions considered, except for the economic pillar due to the collection costs. Home and centralised composting as well as mechanical-biological treatment are associated to more adverse impacts based on our findings. The study informs local stakeholders and authorities on the potential consequences of their options, thereby allowing them to make sound choices for a future waste and circular economy strategy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104854 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7323620</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0921344920301749</els_id><sourcerecordid>2440465234</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-ee1dfbb9df30b1167286bccacd497082ea6a8fc44a3b7bed86bb33bbfb473fab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkVuLFDEQhRtR3NnV32AeBekxt769CMOw6sKKCPocKunqnQzdyZikZ9l_b2Z7GPBJnxKqzjlV1FcU7xhdM8rqj_t1wGi8C2jWnPJTVbaVfFGsWNt0Ja2r9mWxoh1npZCyuyquY9xTSkXbidfFleBtK1nTrYrxxwwu2QTJHpHEOSawDrQdbXoiECPGOKFLxA9k5-eIOz_2ZPC-J48QE5IJHDzgs8Q6knZINlOuhx4m8g1T8Aefo8CRTUB4U7waYIz49vzeFL8-3_7cfi3vv3-5227uSyMrnkpE1g9ad_0gqGasbnhba2PA9LJraMsRamgHIyUI3Wjsc1cLofWgZSMG0OKm-LTkHmY9YW_ydgFGdQh2gvCkPFj1d8fZnXrwR9UILmpOc8D7c0Dwv2eMSU02GhxHcJivoLiUVNYVFzJLm0Vqgo8x4HAZw6g6sVJ7dWGlTqzUwio7PyzOR9R-iMaiM3hxZ1iVpDUT-UN5ldXt_6u3z0C92_rZpWzdLFbMNz9aDOps723eKane238u-we4VcYt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2440465234</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantitative sustainability assessment of household food waste management in the Amsterdam Metropolitan Area</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Tonini, Davide ; Wandl, Alexander ; Meister, Kozmo ; Unceta, Pablo Muñoz ; Taelman, Sue Ellen ; Sanjuan-Delmás, David ; Dewulf, Jo ; Huygens, Dries</creator><creatorcontrib>Tonini, Davide ; Wandl, Alexander ; Meister, Kozmo ; Unceta, Pablo Muñoz ; Taelman, Sue Ellen ; Sanjuan-Delmás, David ; Dewulf, Jo ; Huygens, Dries</creatorcontrib><description>•Multi-fold local & global data collected and processed into a comprehensive framework•Anaerobic digestion with effective nutrient recovery appears the best option•All alternative strategies to incineration increase food waste management costs•Aggregation makes findings accessible to the widest possible audience and stakeholder•The study informs stakeholders and authorities on the consequences of their options
Food waste represents the largest fraction of the municipal solid waste generated in Europe and its management is associated to suboptimal performance in environmental, health, and social dimensions. By processing detailed multi-fold local data as part of a comprehensive and broadly understandable sustainability framework, this study quantifies the environmental and socio-economic impacts of household food waste management in the Amsterdam Metropolitan Area based on priorities set by local stakeholders. Five alternative short-term management options have been assessed against the current system, relying on poor separate collection and incineration. Four options involve separate collection of food waste followed by biological treatments (home/centralised composting and anaerobic digestion) while one involves a mix of separate collection and centralised mechanical-biological treatment followed by anaerobic digestion. Among these, separate collection followed by anaerobic digestion coupled with effective nutrient and energy recovery is, according to our findings, the preferred option to improve the sustainability of the current system in all dimensions considered, except for the economic pillar due to the collection costs. Home and centralised composting as well as mechanical-biological treatment are associated to more adverse impacts based on our findings. The study informs local stakeholders and authorities on the potential consequences of their options, thereby allowing them to make sound choices for a future waste and circular economy strategy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-3449</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0658</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104854</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32884179</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>AMSTERDAM: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Circular Economy ; Engineering ; Engineering, Environmental ; Environmental Sciences ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; LCA ; Life Sciences & Biomedicine ; Local impacts ; Multi-criteria decision analysis ; Science & Technology ; Stakeholder ; Technology ; Waste collection</subject><ispartof>Resources, conservation and recycling, 2020-09, Vol.160, p.104854-104854, Article 104854</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors</rights><rights>2020 The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>48</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000540613000025</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-ee1dfbb9df30b1167286bccacd497082ea6a8fc44a3b7bed86bb33bbfb473fab3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-ee1dfbb9df30b1167286bccacd497082ea6a8fc44a3b7bed86bb33bbfb473fab3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1870-4930 ; 0000-0001-9693-6222 ; 0000-0003-2423-6926 ; 0000-0002-5238-2069</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104854$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tonini, Davide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wandl, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meister, Kozmo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Unceta, Pablo Muñoz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taelman, Sue Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanjuan-Delmás, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dewulf, Jo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huygens, Dries</creatorcontrib><title>Quantitative sustainability assessment of household food waste management in the Amsterdam Metropolitan Area</title><title>Resources, conservation and recycling</title><addtitle>RESOUR CONSERV RECY</addtitle><description>•Multi-fold local & global data collected and processed into a comprehensive framework•Anaerobic digestion with effective nutrient recovery appears the best option•All alternative strategies to incineration increase food waste management costs•Aggregation makes findings accessible to the widest possible audience and stakeholder•The study informs stakeholders and authorities on the consequences of their options
Food waste represents the largest fraction of the municipal solid waste generated in Europe and its management is associated to suboptimal performance in environmental, health, and social dimensions. By processing detailed multi-fold local data as part of a comprehensive and broadly understandable sustainability framework, this study quantifies the environmental and socio-economic impacts of household food waste management in the Amsterdam Metropolitan Area based on priorities set by local stakeholders. Five alternative short-term management options have been assessed against the current system, relying on poor separate collection and incineration. Four options involve separate collection of food waste followed by biological treatments (home/centralised composting and anaerobic digestion) while one involves a mix of separate collection and centralised mechanical-biological treatment followed by anaerobic digestion. Among these, separate collection followed by anaerobic digestion coupled with effective nutrient and energy recovery is, according to our findings, the preferred option to improve the sustainability of the current system in all dimensions considered, except for the economic pillar due to the collection costs. Home and centralised composting as well as mechanical-biological treatment are associated to more adverse impacts based on our findings. The study informs local stakeholders and authorities on the potential consequences of their options, thereby allowing them to make sound choices for a future waste and circular economy strategy.</description><subject>Circular Economy</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Engineering, Environmental</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences & Ecology</subject><subject>LCA</subject><subject>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</subject><subject>Local impacts</subject><subject>Multi-criteria decision analysis</subject><subject>Science & Technology</subject><subject>Stakeholder</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Waste collection</subject><issn>0921-3449</issn><issn>1879-0658</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AOWDO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkVuLFDEQhRtR3NnV32AeBekxt769CMOw6sKKCPocKunqnQzdyZikZ9l_b2Z7GPBJnxKqzjlV1FcU7xhdM8rqj_t1wGi8C2jWnPJTVbaVfFGsWNt0Ja2r9mWxoh1npZCyuyquY9xTSkXbidfFleBtK1nTrYrxxwwu2QTJHpHEOSawDrQdbXoiECPGOKFLxA9k5-eIOz_2ZPC-J48QE5IJHDzgs8Q6knZINlOuhx4m8g1T8Aefo8CRTUB4U7waYIz49vzeFL8-3_7cfi3vv3-5227uSyMrnkpE1g9ad_0gqGasbnhba2PA9LJraMsRamgHIyUI3Wjsc1cLofWgZSMG0OKm-LTkHmY9YW_ydgFGdQh2gvCkPFj1d8fZnXrwR9UILmpOc8D7c0Dwv2eMSU02GhxHcJivoLiUVNYVFzJLm0Vqgo8x4HAZw6g6sVJ7dWGlTqzUwio7PyzOR9R-iMaiM3hxZ1iVpDUT-UN5ldXt_6u3z0C92_rZpWzdLFbMNz9aDOps723eKane238u-we4VcYt</recordid><startdate>202009</startdate><enddate>202009</enddate><creator>Tonini, Davide</creator><creator>Wandl, Alexander</creator><creator>Meister, Kozmo</creator><creator>Unceta, Pablo Muñoz</creator><creator>Taelman, Sue Ellen</creator><creator>Sanjuan-Delmás, David</creator><creator>Dewulf, Jo</creator><creator>Huygens, Dries</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AOWDO</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1870-4930</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9693-6222</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2423-6926</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5238-2069</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202009</creationdate><title>Quantitative sustainability assessment of household food waste management in the Amsterdam Metropolitan Area</title><author>Tonini, Davide ; Wandl, Alexander ; Meister, Kozmo ; Unceta, Pablo Muñoz ; Taelman, Sue Ellen ; Sanjuan-Delmás, David ; Dewulf, Jo ; Huygens, Dries</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-ee1dfbb9df30b1167286bccacd497082ea6a8fc44a3b7bed86bb33bbfb473fab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Circular Economy</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Engineering, Environmental</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences & Ecology</topic><topic>LCA</topic><topic>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</topic><topic>Local impacts</topic><topic>Multi-criteria decision analysis</topic><topic>Science & Technology</topic><topic>Stakeholder</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Waste collection</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tonini, Davide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wandl, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meister, Kozmo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Unceta, Pablo Muñoz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taelman, Sue Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanjuan-Delmás, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dewulf, Jo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huygens, Dries</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Resources, conservation and recycling</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tonini, Davide</au><au>Wandl, Alexander</au><au>Meister, Kozmo</au><au>Unceta, Pablo Muñoz</au><au>Taelman, Sue Ellen</au><au>Sanjuan-Delmás, David</au><au>Dewulf, Jo</au><au>Huygens, Dries</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantitative sustainability assessment of household food waste management in the Amsterdam Metropolitan Area</atitle><jtitle>Resources, conservation and recycling</jtitle><stitle>RESOUR CONSERV RECY</stitle><date>2020-09</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>160</volume><spage>104854</spage><epage>104854</epage><pages>104854-104854</pages><artnum>104854</artnum><issn>0921-3449</issn><eissn>1879-0658</eissn><abstract>•Multi-fold local & global data collected and processed into a comprehensive framework•Anaerobic digestion with effective nutrient recovery appears the best option•All alternative strategies to incineration increase food waste management costs•Aggregation makes findings accessible to the widest possible audience and stakeholder•The study informs stakeholders and authorities on the consequences of their options
Food waste represents the largest fraction of the municipal solid waste generated in Europe and its management is associated to suboptimal performance in environmental, health, and social dimensions. By processing detailed multi-fold local data as part of a comprehensive and broadly understandable sustainability framework, this study quantifies the environmental and socio-economic impacts of household food waste management in the Amsterdam Metropolitan Area based on priorities set by local stakeholders. Five alternative short-term management options have been assessed against the current system, relying on poor separate collection and incineration. Four options involve separate collection of food waste followed by biological treatments (home/centralised composting and anaerobic digestion) while one involves a mix of separate collection and centralised mechanical-biological treatment followed by anaerobic digestion. Among these, separate collection followed by anaerobic digestion coupled with effective nutrient and energy recovery is, according to our findings, the preferred option to improve the sustainability of the current system in all dimensions considered, except for the economic pillar due to the collection costs. Home and centralised composting as well as mechanical-biological treatment are associated to more adverse impacts based on our findings. The study informs local stakeholders and authorities on the potential consequences of their options, thereby allowing them to make sound choices for a future waste and circular economy strategy.</abstract><cop>AMSTERDAM</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>32884179</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104854</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1870-4930</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9693-6222</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2423-6926</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5238-2069</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0921-3449 |
ispartof | Resources, conservation and recycling, 2020-09, Vol.160, p.104854-104854, Article 104854 |
issn | 0921-3449 1879-0658 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7323620 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Circular Economy Engineering Engineering, Environmental Environmental Sciences Environmental Sciences & Ecology LCA Life Sciences & Biomedicine Local impacts Multi-criteria decision analysis Science & Technology Stakeholder Technology Waste collection |
title | Quantitative sustainability assessment of household food waste management in the Amsterdam Metropolitan Area |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T23%3A33%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantitative%20sustainability%20assessment%20of%20household%20food%20waste%20management%20in%20the%20Amsterdam%20Metropolitan%20Area&rft.jtitle=Resources,%20conservation%20and%20recycling&rft.au=Tonini,%20Davide&rft.date=2020-09&rft.volume=160&rft.spage=104854&rft.epage=104854&rft.pages=104854-104854&rft.artnum=104854&rft.issn=0921-3449&rft.eissn=1879-0658&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104854&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_webof%3E2440465234%3C/proquest_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2440465234&rft_id=info:pmid/32884179&rft_els_id=S0921344920301749&rfr_iscdi=true |