Using Socioenvironmental Report Cards as a Tool for Transdisciplinary Collaboration

ABSTRACT The process of developing a socioenvironmental report card through transdisciplinary collaboration can be used in any system and can provide the foundation for collaborative solutions for sustainable resource management by creating a holistic assessment that balances environmental, economic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Integrated environmental assessment and management 2020-06, Vol.16 (4), p.494-507
Hauptverfasser: Vargas‐Nguyen, Vanessa, Kelsey, R Heath, Jordahl, Harald, Nuttle, William, Somerville, Charles, Thomas, Jane, Dennison, William C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 507
container_issue 4
container_start_page 494
container_title Integrated environmental assessment and management
container_volume 16
creator Vargas‐Nguyen, Vanessa
Kelsey, R Heath
Jordahl, Harald
Nuttle, William
Somerville, Charles
Thomas, Jane
Dennison, William C
description ABSTRACT The process of developing a socioenvironmental report card through transdisciplinary collaboration can be used in any system and can provide the foundation for collaborative solutions for sustainable resource management by creating a holistic assessment that balances environmental, economic, and social concerns that incorporates multiple perspectives from multisectoral actors. We demonstrated this in the Mississippi River watershed, USA with the ultimate goal of promoting holistic management of the region's natural resources. But working at the scale of the Mississippi River watershed presents the challenge of working across geographical, organizational, and disciplinary boundaries. The development of a socioenvironmental report card served as the focus for efforts to foster a shared vision among diverse stakeholders in the watershed and to promote transdisciplinary collaboration. The process engaged more than 700 participants from environment, flood control, transportation, water supply, economy, and recreation sectors, from more than 400 organizations representing local, state, and federal government agencies, businesses and trade associations, and private, nonprofit, and academic institutions. This broad engagement in the selection of important themes, indicators, measures, and assessment methods as part of the cocreation of boundary objects aimed to foster social and mutual learning and to develop common understanding and shared visioning among stakeholders with differing perspectives. The process was facilitated by boundary‐spanning organizations, creating an atmosphere of trust by utilizing “third places” for knowledge exchange and integration. This transdisciplinary process also led to collective action through collaboration and selection of restoration and management activities that could improve conditions for multiple sectors simultaneously and/or recognize potential tradeoffs for informed decision making. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2020;16:494–507. © 2020 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC) KEY POINTS We demonstrate that the process of creating a socioenvironmental report card is a practical tool for fostering stakeholder engagement and transdisciplinary collaboration in a complex socioenvironmental system, using the Mississippi River Watershed Report Card as a case study. The process allowed for the eng
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ieam.4243
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7317921</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2339790865</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5093-5d22ed350090972f18c7a9a4f1c6bd14641f25b3b6e6be9588ea30a3a6b664743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1KAzEUhYMo_lQXvoAMuNFFNclNJs1GKKVqQRG0XYfMTKZGZpKatBXf3tRqUUG4kAv5OJxzD0LHBF8QjOmlNbq9YJTBFtonnJMuCAnbm12IPXQQ4wvGDCjQXbQHRDLGQeyjp0m0bpo9-dJ645Y2eNcaN9dN9mhmPsyzgQ5VzHSabOx9k9U-ZOOgXaxsLO2ssU6H92zgm0YXPui59e4Q7dS6iebo6-2gyfVwPLjt3j3cjAb9u27JsYQuryg1FXCMJZaC1qRXCi01q0mZFxVhOSM15QUUuckLI3mvZzRgDTov8pwJBh10tdadLYrWVGXyHXSjZsG2yZPy2qrfP84-q6lfKgFESEqSwNmXQPCvCxPnqk2hTIrijF9ERQGkkLiX84Se_kFf_CK4FE9RRgBjns6cqPM1VQYfYzD1xgzBalWVWlWlVlUl9uSn-w353U0CLtfAm23M-_9KajTs339KfgDxzZ6M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2413005777</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using Socioenvironmental Report Cards as a Tool for Transdisciplinary Collaboration</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Vargas‐Nguyen, Vanessa ; Kelsey, R Heath ; Jordahl, Harald ; Nuttle, William ; Somerville, Charles ; Thomas, Jane ; Dennison, William C</creator><creatorcontrib>Vargas‐Nguyen, Vanessa ; Kelsey, R Heath ; Jordahl, Harald ; Nuttle, William ; Somerville, Charles ; Thomas, Jane ; Dennison, William C</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT The process of developing a socioenvironmental report card through transdisciplinary collaboration can be used in any system and can provide the foundation for collaborative solutions for sustainable resource management by creating a holistic assessment that balances environmental, economic, and social concerns that incorporates multiple perspectives from multisectoral actors. We demonstrated this in the Mississippi River watershed, USA with the ultimate goal of promoting holistic management of the region's natural resources. But working at the scale of the Mississippi River watershed presents the challenge of working across geographical, organizational, and disciplinary boundaries. The development of a socioenvironmental report card served as the focus for efforts to foster a shared vision among diverse stakeholders in the watershed and to promote transdisciplinary collaboration. The process engaged more than 700 participants from environment, flood control, transportation, water supply, economy, and recreation sectors, from more than 400 organizations representing local, state, and federal government agencies, businesses and trade associations, and private, nonprofit, and academic institutions. This broad engagement in the selection of important themes, indicators, measures, and assessment methods as part of the cocreation of boundary objects aimed to foster social and mutual learning and to develop common understanding and shared visioning among stakeholders with differing perspectives. The process was facilitated by boundary‐spanning organizations, creating an atmosphere of trust by utilizing “third places” for knowledge exchange and integration. This transdisciplinary process also led to collective action through collaboration and selection of restoration and management activities that could improve conditions for multiple sectors simultaneously and/or recognize potential tradeoffs for informed decision making. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2020;16:494–507. © 2020 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology &amp; Chemistry (SETAC) KEY POINTS We demonstrate that the process of creating a socioenvironmental report card is a practical tool for fostering stakeholder engagement and transdisciplinary collaboration in a complex socioenvironmental system, using the Mississippi River Watershed Report Card as a case study. The process allowed for the engagement of a diverse multisector group of stakeholders through multiple workshops that served as “third places” and the codevelopment of boundary objects such as conceptual diagrams and maps, newsletters, and the report card product itself. The report card results led to a common understanding of key issues that are important to sustainable management, identified information gaps and data needs, and promoted more discussion on the challenges, opportunities, and actions needed to improve the Mississippi River watershed. This process can be used in any system and can provide the foundation for collective action for sustainable management by creating a holistic assessment that balances environmental, economic, and social concerns and that incorporates multiple perspectives from multisectoral actors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1551-3777</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-3793</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ieam.4243</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31944537</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Collaboration ; Decision making ; Economics ; Environmental assessment ; Environmental Impact Assessment ; Environmental Management ; Federal government ; Flood control ; Government ; Government agencies ; Integrated environmental assessment ; Integrated management ; Measurement methods ; Mississippi River ; Natural resource management ; Natural resources ; Organizations ; Report card ; Resource management ; Restoration ; Rivers ; Social discrimination learning ; Socioenvironmental ; Toxicology ; Trade associations ; Trade organizations ; Transdisciplinary collaboration ; Transport ; Water supply ; Watershed management ; Watersheds</subject><ispartof>Integrated environmental assessment and management, 2020-06, Vol.16 (4), p.494-507</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology &amp; Chemistry (SETAC)</rights><rights>2020 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology &amp; Chemistry (SETAC).</rights><rights>2020. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5093-5d22ed350090972f18c7a9a4f1c6bd14641f25b3b6e6be9588ea30a3a6b664743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5093-5d22ed350090972f18c7a9a4f1c6bd14641f25b3b6e6be9588ea30a3a6b664743</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0724-393X ; 0000-0001-7163-5837</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fieam.4243$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fieam.4243$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31944537$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vargas‐Nguyen, Vanessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelsey, R Heath</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordahl, Harald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nuttle, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Somerville, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dennison, William C</creatorcontrib><title>Using Socioenvironmental Report Cards as a Tool for Transdisciplinary Collaboration</title><title>Integrated environmental assessment and management</title><addtitle>Integr Environ Assess Manag</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT The process of developing a socioenvironmental report card through transdisciplinary collaboration can be used in any system and can provide the foundation for collaborative solutions for sustainable resource management by creating a holistic assessment that balances environmental, economic, and social concerns that incorporates multiple perspectives from multisectoral actors. We demonstrated this in the Mississippi River watershed, USA with the ultimate goal of promoting holistic management of the region's natural resources. But working at the scale of the Mississippi River watershed presents the challenge of working across geographical, organizational, and disciplinary boundaries. The development of a socioenvironmental report card served as the focus for efforts to foster a shared vision among diverse stakeholders in the watershed and to promote transdisciplinary collaboration. The process engaged more than 700 participants from environment, flood control, transportation, water supply, economy, and recreation sectors, from more than 400 organizations representing local, state, and federal government agencies, businesses and trade associations, and private, nonprofit, and academic institutions. This broad engagement in the selection of important themes, indicators, measures, and assessment methods as part of the cocreation of boundary objects aimed to foster social and mutual learning and to develop common understanding and shared visioning among stakeholders with differing perspectives. The process was facilitated by boundary‐spanning organizations, creating an atmosphere of trust by utilizing “third places” for knowledge exchange and integration. This transdisciplinary process also led to collective action through collaboration and selection of restoration and management activities that could improve conditions for multiple sectors simultaneously and/or recognize potential tradeoffs for informed decision making. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2020;16:494–507. © 2020 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology &amp; Chemistry (SETAC) KEY POINTS We demonstrate that the process of creating a socioenvironmental report card is a practical tool for fostering stakeholder engagement and transdisciplinary collaboration in a complex socioenvironmental system, using the Mississippi River Watershed Report Card as a case study. The process allowed for the engagement of a diverse multisector group of stakeholders through multiple workshops that served as “third places” and the codevelopment of boundary objects such as conceptual diagrams and maps, newsletters, and the report card product itself. The report card results led to a common understanding of key issues that are important to sustainable management, identified information gaps and data needs, and promoted more discussion on the challenges, opportunities, and actions needed to improve the Mississippi River watershed. This process can be used in any system and can provide the foundation for collective action for sustainable management by creating a holistic assessment that balances environmental, economic, and social concerns and that incorporates multiple perspectives from multisectoral actors.</description><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Environmental assessment</subject><subject>Environmental Impact Assessment</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Federal government</subject><subject>Flood control</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Government agencies</subject><subject>Integrated environmental assessment</subject><subject>Integrated management</subject><subject>Measurement methods</subject><subject>Mississippi River</subject><subject>Natural resource management</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Organizations</subject><subject>Report card</subject><subject>Resource management</subject><subject>Restoration</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Social discrimination learning</subject><subject>Socioenvironmental</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><subject>Trade associations</subject><subject>Trade organizations</subject><subject>Transdisciplinary collaboration</subject><subject>Transport</subject><subject>Water supply</subject><subject>Watershed management</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><issn>1551-3777</issn><issn>1551-3793</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1KAzEUhYMo_lQXvoAMuNFFNclNJs1GKKVqQRG0XYfMTKZGZpKatBXf3tRqUUG4kAv5OJxzD0LHBF8QjOmlNbq9YJTBFtonnJMuCAnbm12IPXQQ4wvGDCjQXbQHRDLGQeyjp0m0bpo9-dJ645Y2eNcaN9dN9mhmPsyzgQ5VzHSabOx9k9U-ZOOgXaxsLO2ssU6H92zgm0YXPui59e4Q7dS6iebo6-2gyfVwPLjt3j3cjAb9u27JsYQuryg1FXCMJZaC1qRXCi01q0mZFxVhOSM15QUUuckLI3mvZzRgDTov8pwJBh10tdadLYrWVGXyHXSjZsG2yZPy2qrfP84-q6lfKgFESEqSwNmXQPCvCxPnqk2hTIrijF9ERQGkkLiX84Se_kFf_CK4FE9RRgBjns6cqPM1VQYfYzD1xgzBalWVWlWlVlUl9uSn-w353U0CLtfAm23M-_9KajTs339KfgDxzZ6M</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>Vargas‐Nguyen, Vanessa</creator><creator>Kelsey, R Heath</creator><creator>Jordahl, Harald</creator><creator>Nuttle, William</creator><creator>Somerville, Charles</creator><creator>Thomas, Jane</creator><creator>Dennison, William C</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0724-393X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7163-5837</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>Using Socioenvironmental Report Cards as a Tool for Transdisciplinary Collaboration</title><author>Vargas‐Nguyen, Vanessa ; Kelsey, R Heath ; Jordahl, Harald ; Nuttle, William ; Somerville, Charles ; Thomas, Jane ; Dennison, William C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5093-5d22ed350090972f18c7a9a4f1c6bd14641f25b3b6e6be9588ea30a3a6b664743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Environmental assessment</topic><topic>Environmental Impact Assessment</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Federal government</topic><topic>Flood control</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Government agencies</topic><topic>Integrated environmental assessment</topic><topic>Integrated management</topic><topic>Measurement methods</topic><topic>Mississippi River</topic><topic>Natural resource management</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Organizations</topic><topic>Report card</topic><topic>Resource management</topic><topic>Restoration</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Social discrimination learning</topic><topic>Socioenvironmental</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><topic>Trade associations</topic><topic>Trade organizations</topic><topic>Transdisciplinary collaboration</topic><topic>Transport</topic><topic>Water supply</topic><topic>Watershed management</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vargas‐Nguyen, Vanessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelsey, R Heath</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordahl, Harald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nuttle, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Somerville, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dennison, William C</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Integrated environmental assessment and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vargas‐Nguyen, Vanessa</au><au>Kelsey, R Heath</au><au>Jordahl, Harald</au><au>Nuttle, William</au><au>Somerville, Charles</au><au>Thomas, Jane</au><au>Dennison, William C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using Socioenvironmental Report Cards as a Tool for Transdisciplinary Collaboration</atitle><jtitle>Integrated environmental assessment and management</jtitle><addtitle>Integr Environ Assess Manag</addtitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>494</spage><epage>507</epage><pages>494-507</pages><issn>1551-3777</issn><eissn>1551-3793</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT The process of developing a socioenvironmental report card through transdisciplinary collaboration can be used in any system and can provide the foundation for collaborative solutions for sustainable resource management by creating a holistic assessment that balances environmental, economic, and social concerns that incorporates multiple perspectives from multisectoral actors. We demonstrated this in the Mississippi River watershed, USA with the ultimate goal of promoting holistic management of the region's natural resources. But working at the scale of the Mississippi River watershed presents the challenge of working across geographical, organizational, and disciplinary boundaries. The development of a socioenvironmental report card served as the focus for efforts to foster a shared vision among diverse stakeholders in the watershed and to promote transdisciplinary collaboration. The process engaged more than 700 participants from environment, flood control, transportation, water supply, economy, and recreation sectors, from more than 400 organizations representing local, state, and federal government agencies, businesses and trade associations, and private, nonprofit, and academic institutions. This broad engagement in the selection of important themes, indicators, measures, and assessment methods as part of the cocreation of boundary objects aimed to foster social and mutual learning and to develop common understanding and shared visioning among stakeholders with differing perspectives. The process was facilitated by boundary‐spanning organizations, creating an atmosphere of trust by utilizing “third places” for knowledge exchange and integration. This transdisciplinary process also led to collective action through collaboration and selection of restoration and management activities that could improve conditions for multiple sectors simultaneously and/or recognize potential tradeoffs for informed decision making. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2020;16:494–507. © 2020 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology &amp; Chemistry (SETAC) KEY POINTS We demonstrate that the process of creating a socioenvironmental report card is a practical tool for fostering stakeholder engagement and transdisciplinary collaboration in a complex socioenvironmental system, using the Mississippi River Watershed Report Card as a case study. The process allowed for the engagement of a diverse multisector group of stakeholders through multiple workshops that served as “third places” and the codevelopment of boundary objects such as conceptual diagrams and maps, newsletters, and the report card product itself. The report card results led to a common understanding of key issues that are important to sustainable management, identified information gaps and data needs, and promoted more discussion on the challenges, opportunities, and actions needed to improve the Mississippi River watershed. This process can be used in any system and can provide the foundation for collective action for sustainable management by creating a holistic assessment that balances environmental, economic, and social concerns and that incorporates multiple perspectives from multisectoral actors.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>31944537</pmid><doi>10.1002/ieam.4243</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0724-393X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7163-5837</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1551-3777
ispartof Integrated environmental assessment and management, 2020-06, Vol.16 (4), p.494-507
issn 1551-3777
1551-3793
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7317921
source Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Collaboration
Decision making
Economics
Environmental assessment
Environmental Impact Assessment
Environmental Management
Federal government
Flood control
Government
Government agencies
Integrated environmental assessment
Integrated management
Measurement methods
Mississippi River
Natural resource management
Natural resources
Organizations
Report card
Resource management
Restoration
Rivers
Social discrimination learning
Socioenvironmental
Toxicology
Trade associations
Trade organizations
Transdisciplinary collaboration
Transport
Water supply
Watershed management
Watersheds
title Using Socioenvironmental Report Cards as a Tool for Transdisciplinary Collaboration
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T20%3A15%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20Socioenvironmental%20Report%20Cards%20as%20a%20Tool%20for%20Transdisciplinary%20Collaboration&rft.jtitle=Integrated%20environmental%20assessment%20and%20management&rft.au=Vargas%E2%80%90Nguyen,%20Vanessa&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=494&rft.epage=507&rft.pages=494-507&rft.issn=1551-3777&rft.eissn=1551-3793&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ieam.4243&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2339790865%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2413005777&rft_id=info:pmid/31944537&rfr_iscdi=true