Emergency preparedness, resilience and response guidance for UK hospital transfusion teams
Objectives To present Emergency Preparedness, Resilience and Response (EPRR) guidance for Hospital Transfusion Teams on behalf of the National Blood Transfusion Committee emergency planning working group. Background The Civil Contingencies Act 2004 requires healthcare organisations to demonstrate th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England) England), 2020-06, Vol.30 (3), p.177-185 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 185 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 177 |
container_title | Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England) |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Doughty, Heidi Chowdhury, Fateha Ameh, V Batrick, N Baxter, L Bolton–Maggs, P Cowdrey, T Glasgow, S Jackson, A Robinson, S Smith, M Staves, J Sorour, Y Pendry, K Uprichard, J Weaver, A Wilkes, C Allard, S Murphy, M Kendrick, C. Doughty, H Earley, J Frith, L |
description | Objectives
To present Emergency Preparedness, Resilience and Response (EPRR) guidance for Hospital Transfusion Teams on behalf of the National Blood Transfusion Committee emergency planning working group.
Background
The Civil Contingencies Act 2004 requires healthcare organisations to demonstrate that they can deal with major incidents while maintaining critical services. Recent mass casualty events and the use of transfusion‐based resuscitation have highlighted the evolving role of the Hospital Transfusion Team.
Methods
This multi‐disciplinary advice is informed by recent global and national experience, the 2018 NHS England clinical guidelines for Major Incidents, and stakeholder workshops.
Guidance
Transfusion staff should be familiar with local EPRR plans including casualty type and numbers. Staff should be exercised as part of wider Trust preparation, with documented roles and responsibilities. Transfusion support should be proactive and include blood issue, regulatory compliance and sample handling. Robust LIMS‐compatible emergency identification systems are essential to minimise errors. Emergency stock management requires rapid assessment of existing stock and estimated demand before re‐ordering. Initial demand should be based on 2 to 4 red blood cells (RBC) per patient admitted. Patients with significant haemorrhage may require further red cells and early haemostatic support. Where “universal” components are demanded, they should be gender appropriate. Senior staff should lead the response, log and communicate key decisions, and prepare for post‐incident recovery.
Conclusions
Transfusion teams have an important role in ensuring continuity of transfusion support. Teams should develop their EPRR plans based on local plans and national guidance. Emergency preparedness should include post‐incident debriefing for ongoing staff support and future service improvement. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/tme.12665 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7317494</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2351486575</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4155-2a0b66ad174bbaf10bc36ced12fa228dbb227617608a7c4600b46c0cd9643f3b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9P2zAUxy0EoqXjwD-AcgRpKf4RO-ll0oQ6Nq1ol_bCxbKdl2KU2JmdDPW_n0sBbQd8sez30ec9vS9CFwTPSTo3QwdzQoXgR2hKmOA5I0V1jKZ4wau85GU1QWcxPmFMGF3QUzRhFFMsqmKKHpYdhC04s8v6AL0KUDuI8XMWINrWpgJkytX7Z-9dhGw72lrtfxsfss3P7NHH3g6qzYagXGzGaL3LBlBd_IROGtVGOH-9Z2jzbbm-_Z6vft39uP26yk1BOM-pwloIVZOy0Fo1BGvDhIGa0EZRWtVaU1oKUgpcqdIUAmNdCINNvRAFa5hmM_Tl4O1H3UFtwKVRWtkH26mwk15Z-X_F2Ue59X9kyVLPRZEEV6-C4H-PEAfZ2WigbZUDP0ZJGU_7FLzkCb0-oCb4GAM0720IlvssZMpCvmSR2Mt_53on35afgJsD8Gxb2H1skuv75UH5F4bPldM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2351486575</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Emergency preparedness, resilience and response guidance for UK hospital transfusion teams</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Doughty, Heidi ; Chowdhury, Fateha ; Ameh, V ; Batrick, N ; Baxter, L ; Bolton–Maggs, P ; Cowdrey, T ; Glasgow, S ; Jackson, A ; Robinson, S ; Smith, M ; Staves, J ; Sorour, Y ; Pendry, K ; Uprichard, J ; Weaver, A ; Wilkes, C ; Allard, S ; Murphy, M ; Kendrick, C. ; Doughty, H ; Earley, J ; Frith, L</creator><creatorcontrib>Doughty, Heidi ; Chowdhury, Fateha ; Ameh, V ; Batrick, N ; Baxter, L ; Bolton–Maggs, P ; Cowdrey, T ; Glasgow, S ; Jackson, A ; Robinson, S ; Smith, M ; Staves, J ; Sorour, Y ; Pendry, K ; Uprichard, J ; Weaver, A ; Wilkes, C ; Allard, S ; Murphy, M ; Kendrick, C. ; Doughty, H ; Earley, J ; Frith, L ; National Blood Transfusion Committee Emergency Planning Working Group ; the National Blood Transfusion Committee Emergency Planning Working Group</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
To present Emergency Preparedness, Resilience and Response (EPRR) guidance for Hospital Transfusion Teams on behalf of the National Blood Transfusion Committee emergency planning working group.
Background
The Civil Contingencies Act 2004 requires healthcare organisations to demonstrate that they can deal with major incidents while maintaining critical services. Recent mass casualty events and the use of transfusion‐based resuscitation have highlighted the evolving role of the Hospital Transfusion Team.
Methods
This multi‐disciplinary advice is informed by recent global and national experience, the 2018 NHS England clinical guidelines for Major Incidents, and stakeholder workshops.
Guidance
Transfusion staff should be familiar with local EPRR plans including casualty type and numbers. Staff should be exercised as part of wider Trust preparation, with documented roles and responsibilities. Transfusion support should be proactive and include blood issue, regulatory compliance and sample handling. Robust LIMS‐compatible emergency identification systems are essential to minimise errors. Emergency stock management requires rapid assessment of existing stock and estimated demand before re‐ordering. Initial demand should be based on 2 to 4 red blood cells (RBC) per patient admitted. Patients with significant haemorrhage may require further red cells and early haemostatic support. Where “universal” components are demanded, they should be gender appropriate. Senior staff should lead the response, log and communicate key decisions, and prepare for post‐incident recovery.
Conclusions
Transfusion teams have an important role in ensuring continuity of transfusion support. Teams should develop their EPRR plans based on local plans and national guidance. Emergency preparedness should include post‐incident debriefing for ongoing staff support and future service improvement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0958-7578</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-3148</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/tme.12665</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32020684</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Blood Safety - standards ; Blood Transfusion - standards ; Civil Defense - organization & administration ; Civil Defense - standards ; emergency planning ; Guidelines ; Hospitals - standards ; Humans ; major incidents ; Mass Casualty Incidents ; transfusion ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England), 2020-06, Vol.30 (3), p.177-185</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors. Transfusion Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Blood Transfusion Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4155-2a0b66ad174bbaf10bc36ced12fa228dbb227617608a7c4600b46c0cd9643f3b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4155-2a0b66ad174bbaf10bc36ced12fa228dbb227617608a7c4600b46c0cd9643f3b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4328-1204 ; 0000-0002-5444-6222</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Ftme.12665$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Ftme.12665$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32020684$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Doughty, Heidi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chowdhury, Fateha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ameh, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batrick, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baxter, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolton–Maggs, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cowdrey, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glasgow, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staves, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sorour, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pendry, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uprichard, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weaver, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilkes, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allard, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kendrick, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doughty, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Earley, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frith, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>National Blood Transfusion Committee Emergency Planning Working Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the National Blood Transfusion Committee Emergency Planning Working Group</creatorcontrib><title>Emergency preparedness, resilience and response guidance for UK hospital transfusion teams</title><title>Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England)</title><addtitle>Transfus Med</addtitle><description>Objectives
To present Emergency Preparedness, Resilience and Response (EPRR) guidance for Hospital Transfusion Teams on behalf of the National Blood Transfusion Committee emergency planning working group.
Background
The Civil Contingencies Act 2004 requires healthcare organisations to demonstrate that they can deal with major incidents while maintaining critical services. Recent mass casualty events and the use of transfusion‐based resuscitation have highlighted the evolving role of the Hospital Transfusion Team.
Methods
This multi‐disciplinary advice is informed by recent global and national experience, the 2018 NHS England clinical guidelines for Major Incidents, and stakeholder workshops.
Guidance
Transfusion staff should be familiar with local EPRR plans including casualty type and numbers. Staff should be exercised as part of wider Trust preparation, with documented roles and responsibilities. Transfusion support should be proactive and include blood issue, regulatory compliance and sample handling. Robust LIMS‐compatible emergency identification systems are essential to minimise errors. Emergency stock management requires rapid assessment of existing stock and estimated demand before re‐ordering. Initial demand should be based on 2 to 4 red blood cells (RBC) per patient admitted. Patients with significant haemorrhage may require further red cells and early haemostatic support. Where “universal” components are demanded, they should be gender appropriate. Senior staff should lead the response, log and communicate key decisions, and prepare for post‐incident recovery.
Conclusions
Transfusion teams have an important role in ensuring continuity of transfusion support. Teams should develop their EPRR plans based on local plans and national guidance. Emergency preparedness should include post‐incident debriefing for ongoing staff support and future service improvement.</description><subject>Blood Safety - standards</subject><subject>Blood Transfusion - standards</subject><subject>Civil Defense - organization & administration</subject><subject>Civil Defense - standards</subject><subject>emergency planning</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Hospitals - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>major incidents</subject><subject>Mass Casualty Incidents</subject><subject>transfusion</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>0958-7578</issn><issn>1365-3148</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9P2zAUxy0EoqXjwD-AcgRpKf4RO-ll0oQ6Nq1ol_bCxbKdl2KU2JmdDPW_n0sBbQd8sez30ec9vS9CFwTPSTo3QwdzQoXgR2hKmOA5I0V1jKZ4wau85GU1QWcxPmFMGF3QUzRhFFMsqmKKHpYdhC04s8v6AL0KUDuI8XMWINrWpgJkytX7Z-9dhGw72lrtfxsfss3P7NHH3g6qzYagXGzGaL3LBlBd_IROGtVGOH-9Z2jzbbm-_Z6vft39uP26yk1BOM-pwloIVZOy0Fo1BGvDhIGa0EZRWtVaU1oKUgpcqdIUAmNdCINNvRAFa5hmM_Tl4O1H3UFtwKVRWtkH26mwk15Z-X_F2Ue59X9kyVLPRZEEV6-C4H-PEAfZ2WigbZUDP0ZJGU_7FLzkCb0-oCb4GAM0720IlvssZMpCvmSR2Mt_53on35afgJsD8Gxb2H1skuv75UH5F4bPldM</recordid><startdate>202006</startdate><enddate>202006</enddate><creator>Doughty, Heidi</creator><creator>Chowdhury, Fateha</creator><creator>Ameh, V</creator><creator>Batrick, N</creator><creator>Baxter, L</creator><creator>Bolton–Maggs, P</creator><creator>Cowdrey, T</creator><creator>Glasgow, S</creator><creator>Jackson, A</creator><creator>Robinson, S</creator><creator>Smith, M</creator><creator>Staves, J</creator><creator>Sorour, Y</creator><creator>Pendry, K</creator><creator>Uprichard, J</creator><creator>Weaver, A</creator><creator>Wilkes, C</creator><creator>Allard, S</creator><creator>Murphy, M</creator><creator>Kendrick, C.</creator><creator>Doughty, H</creator><creator>Earley, J</creator><creator>Frith, L</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4328-1204</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5444-6222</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202006</creationdate><title>Emergency preparedness, resilience and response guidance for UK hospital transfusion teams</title><author>Doughty, Heidi ; Chowdhury, Fateha ; Ameh, V ; Batrick, N ; Baxter, L ; Bolton–Maggs, P ; Cowdrey, T ; Glasgow, S ; Jackson, A ; Robinson, S ; Smith, M ; Staves, J ; Sorour, Y ; Pendry, K ; Uprichard, J ; Weaver, A ; Wilkes, C ; Allard, S ; Murphy, M ; Kendrick, C. ; Doughty, H ; Earley, J ; Frith, L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4155-2a0b66ad174bbaf10bc36ced12fa228dbb227617608a7c4600b46c0cd9643f3b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Blood Safety - standards</topic><topic>Blood Transfusion - standards</topic><topic>Civil Defense - organization & administration</topic><topic>Civil Defense - standards</topic><topic>emergency planning</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Hospitals - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>major incidents</topic><topic>Mass Casualty Incidents</topic><topic>transfusion</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Doughty, Heidi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chowdhury, Fateha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ameh, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batrick, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baxter, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolton–Maggs, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cowdrey, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glasgow, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staves, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sorour, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pendry, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uprichard, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weaver, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilkes, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allard, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kendrick, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doughty, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Earley, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frith, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>National Blood Transfusion Committee Emergency Planning Working Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the National Blood Transfusion Committee Emergency Planning Working Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Doughty, Heidi</au><au>Chowdhury, Fateha</au><au>Ameh, V</au><au>Batrick, N</au><au>Baxter, L</au><au>Bolton–Maggs, P</au><au>Cowdrey, T</au><au>Glasgow, S</au><au>Jackson, A</au><au>Robinson, S</au><au>Smith, M</au><au>Staves, J</au><au>Sorour, Y</au><au>Pendry, K</au><au>Uprichard, J</au><au>Weaver, A</au><au>Wilkes, C</au><au>Allard, S</au><au>Murphy, M</au><au>Kendrick, C.</au><au>Doughty, H</au><au>Earley, J</au><au>Frith, L</au><aucorp>National Blood Transfusion Committee Emergency Planning Working Group</aucorp><aucorp>the National Blood Transfusion Committee Emergency Planning Working Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Emergency preparedness, resilience and response guidance for UK hospital transfusion teams</atitle><jtitle>Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Transfus Med</addtitle><date>2020-06</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>177</spage><epage>185</epage><pages>177-185</pages><issn>0958-7578</issn><eissn>1365-3148</eissn><abstract>Objectives
To present Emergency Preparedness, Resilience and Response (EPRR) guidance for Hospital Transfusion Teams on behalf of the National Blood Transfusion Committee emergency planning working group.
Background
The Civil Contingencies Act 2004 requires healthcare organisations to demonstrate that they can deal with major incidents while maintaining critical services. Recent mass casualty events and the use of transfusion‐based resuscitation have highlighted the evolving role of the Hospital Transfusion Team.
Methods
This multi‐disciplinary advice is informed by recent global and national experience, the 2018 NHS England clinical guidelines for Major Incidents, and stakeholder workshops.
Guidance
Transfusion staff should be familiar with local EPRR plans including casualty type and numbers. Staff should be exercised as part of wider Trust preparation, with documented roles and responsibilities. Transfusion support should be proactive and include blood issue, regulatory compliance and sample handling. Robust LIMS‐compatible emergency identification systems are essential to minimise errors. Emergency stock management requires rapid assessment of existing stock and estimated demand before re‐ordering. Initial demand should be based on 2 to 4 red blood cells (RBC) per patient admitted. Patients with significant haemorrhage may require further red cells and early haemostatic support. Where “universal” components are demanded, they should be gender appropriate. Senior staff should lead the response, log and communicate key decisions, and prepare for post‐incident recovery.
Conclusions
Transfusion teams have an important role in ensuring continuity of transfusion support. Teams should develop their EPRR plans based on local plans and national guidance. Emergency preparedness should include post‐incident debriefing for ongoing staff support and future service improvement.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>32020684</pmid><doi>10.1111/tme.12665</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4328-1204</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5444-6222</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0958-7578 |
ispartof | Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England), 2020-06, Vol.30 (3), p.177-185 |
issn | 0958-7578 1365-3148 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7317494 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Blood Safety - standards Blood Transfusion - standards Civil Defense - organization & administration Civil Defense - standards emergency planning Guidelines Hospitals - standards Humans major incidents Mass Casualty Incidents transfusion United Kingdom |
title | Emergency preparedness, resilience and response guidance for UK hospital transfusion teams |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T20%3A50%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Emergency%20preparedness,%20resilience%20and%20response%20guidance%20for%20UK%20hospital%20transfusion%20teams&rft.jtitle=Transfusion%20medicine%20(Oxford,%20England)&rft.au=Doughty,%20Heidi&rft.aucorp=National%20Blood%20Transfusion%20Committee%20Emergency%20Planning%20Working%20Group&rft.date=2020-06&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=177&rft.epage=185&rft.pages=177-185&rft.issn=0958-7578&rft.eissn=1365-3148&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/tme.12665&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2351486575%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2351486575&rft_id=info:pmid/32020684&rfr_iscdi=true |