Emergency preparedness, resilience and response guidance for UK hospital transfusion teams

Objectives To present Emergency Preparedness, Resilience and Response (EPRR) guidance for Hospital Transfusion Teams on behalf of the National Blood Transfusion Committee emergency planning working group. Background The Civil Contingencies Act 2004 requires healthcare organisations to demonstrate th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England) England), 2020-06, Vol.30 (3), p.177-185
Hauptverfasser: Doughty, Heidi, Chowdhury, Fateha, Ameh, V, Batrick, N, Baxter, L, Bolton–Maggs, P, Cowdrey, T, Glasgow, S, Jackson, A, Robinson, S, Smith, M, Staves, J, Sorour, Y, Pendry, K, Uprichard, J, Weaver, A, Wilkes, C, Allard, S, Murphy, M, Kendrick, C., Doughty, H, Earley, J, Frith, L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 185
container_issue 3
container_start_page 177
container_title Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England)
container_volume 30
creator Doughty, Heidi
Chowdhury, Fateha
Ameh, V
Batrick, N
Baxter, L
Bolton–Maggs, P
Cowdrey, T
Glasgow, S
Jackson, A
Robinson, S
Smith, M
Staves, J
Sorour, Y
Pendry, K
Uprichard, J
Weaver, A
Wilkes, C
Allard, S
Murphy, M
Kendrick, C.
Doughty, H
Earley, J
Frith, L
description Objectives To present Emergency Preparedness, Resilience and Response (EPRR) guidance for Hospital Transfusion Teams on behalf of the National Blood Transfusion Committee emergency planning working group. Background The Civil Contingencies Act 2004 requires healthcare organisations to demonstrate that they can deal with major incidents while maintaining critical services. Recent mass casualty events and the use of transfusion‐based resuscitation have highlighted the evolving role of the Hospital Transfusion Team. Methods This multi‐disciplinary advice is informed by recent global and national experience, the 2018 NHS England clinical guidelines for Major Incidents, and stakeholder workshops. Guidance Transfusion staff should be familiar with local EPRR plans including casualty type and numbers. Staff should be exercised as part of wider Trust preparation, with documented roles and responsibilities. Transfusion support should be proactive and include blood issue, regulatory compliance and sample handling. Robust LIMS‐compatible emergency identification systems are essential to minimise errors. Emergency stock management requires rapid assessment of existing stock and estimated demand before re‐ordering. Initial demand should be based on 2 to 4 red blood cells (RBC) per patient admitted. Patients with significant haemorrhage may require further red cells and early haemostatic support. Where “universal” components are demanded, they should be gender appropriate. Senior staff should lead the response, log and communicate key decisions, and prepare for post‐incident recovery. Conclusions Transfusion teams have an important role in ensuring continuity of transfusion support. Teams should develop their EPRR plans based on local plans and national guidance. Emergency preparedness should include post‐incident debriefing for ongoing staff support and future service improvement.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/tme.12665
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7317494</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2351486575</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4155-2a0b66ad174bbaf10bc36ced12fa228dbb227617608a7c4600b46c0cd9643f3b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9P2zAUxy0EoqXjwD-AcgRpKf4RO-ll0oQ6Nq1ol_bCxbKdl2KU2JmdDPW_n0sBbQd8sez30ec9vS9CFwTPSTo3QwdzQoXgR2hKmOA5I0V1jKZ4wau85GU1QWcxPmFMGF3QUzRhFFMsqmKKHpYdhC04s8v6AL0KUDuI8XMWINrWpgJkytX7Z-9dhGw72lrtfxsfss3P7NHH3g6qzYagXGzGaL3LBlBd_IROGtVGOH-9Z2jzbbm-_Z6vft39uP26yk1BOM-pwloIVZOy0Fo1BGvDhIGa0EZRWtVaU1oKUgpcqdIUAmNdCINNvRAFa5hmM_Tl4O1H3UFtwKVRWtkH26mwk15Z-X_F2Ue59X9kyVLPRZEEV6-C4H-PEAfZ2WigbZUDP0ZJGU_7FLzkCb0-oCb4GAM0720IlvssZMpCvmSR2Mt_53on35afgJsD8Gxb2H1skuv75UH5F4bPldM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2351486575</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Emergency preparedness, resilience and response guidance for UK hospital transfusion teams</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Doughty, Heidi ; Chowdhury, Fateha ; Ameh, V ; Batrick, N ; Baxter, L ; Bolton–Maggs, P ; Cowdrey, T ; Glasgow, S ; Jackson, A ; Robinson, S ; Smith, M ; Staves, J ; Sorour, Y ; Pendry, K ; Uprichard, J ; Weaver, A ; Wilkes, C ; Allard, S ; Murphy, M ; Kendrick, C. ; Doughty, H ; Earley, J ; Frith, L</creator><creatorcontrib>Doughty, Heidi ; Chowdhury, Fateha ; Ameh, V ; Batrick, N ; Baxter, L ; Bolton–Maggs, P ; Cowdrey, T ; Glasgow, S ; Jackson, A ; Robinson, S ; Smith, M ; Staves, J ; Sorour, Y ; Pendry, K ; Uprichard, J ; Weaver, A ; Wilkes, C ; Allard, S ; Murphy, M ; Kendrick, C. ; Doughty, H ; Earley, J ; Frith, L ; National Blood Transfusion Committee Emergency Planning Working Group ; the National Blood Transfusion Committee Emergency Planning Working Group</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives To present Emergency Preparedness, Resilience and Response (EPRR) guidance for Hospital Transfusion Teams on behalf of the National Blood Transfusion Committee emergency planning working group. Background The Civil Contingencies Act 2004 requires healthcare organisations to demonstrate that they can deal with major incidents while maintaining critical services. Recent mass casualty events and the use of transfusion‐based resuscitation have highlighted the evolving role of the Hospital Transfusion Team. Methods This multi‐disciplinary advice is informed by recent global and national experience, the 2018 NHS England clinical guidelines for Major Incidents, and stakeholder workshops. Guidance Transfusion staff should be familiar with local EPRR plans including casualty type and numbers. Staff should be exercised as part of wider Trust preparation, with documented roles and responsibilities. Transfusion support should be proactive and include blood issue, regulatory compliance and sample handling. Robust LIMS‐compatible emergency identification systems are essential to minimise errors. Emergency stock management requires rapid assessment of existing stock and estimated demand before re‐ordering. Initial demand should be based on 2 to 4 red blood cells (RBC) per patient admitted. Patients with significant haemorrhage may require further red cells and early haemostatic support. Where “universal” components are demanded, they should be gender appropriate. Senior staff should lead the response, log and communicate key decisions, and prepare for post‐incident recovery. Conclusions Transfusion teams have an important role in ensuring continuity of transfusion support. Teams should develop their EPRR plans based on local plans and national guidance. Emergency preparedness should include post‐incident debriefing for ongoing staff support and future service improvement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0958-7578</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-3148</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/tme.12665</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32020684</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Blood Safety - standards ; Blood Transfusion - standards ; Civil Defense - organization &amp; administration ; Civil Defense - standards ; emergency planning ; Guidelines ; Hospitals - standards ; Humans ; major incidents ; Mass Casualty Incidents ; transfusion ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England), 2020-06, Vol.30 (3), p.177-185</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors. Transfusion Medicine published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of British Blood Transfusion Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4155-2a0b66ad174bbaf10bc36ced12fa228dbb227617608a7c4600b46c0cd9643f3b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4155-2a0b66ad174bbaf10bc36ced12fa228dbb227617608a7c4600b46c0cd9643f3b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4328-1204 ; 0000-0002-5444-6222</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Ftme.12665$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Ftme.12665$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32020684$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Doughty, Heidi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chowdhury, Fateha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ameh, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batrick, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baxter, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolton–Maggs, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cowdrey, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glasgow, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staves, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sorour, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pendry, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uprichard, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weaver, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilkes, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allard, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kendrick, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doughty, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Earley, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frith, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>National Blood Transfusion Committee Emergency Planning Working Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the National Blood Transfusion Committee Emergency Planning Working Group</creatorcontrib><title>Emergency preparedness, resilience and response guidance for UK hospital transfusion teams</title><title>Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England)</title><addtitle>Transfus Med</addtitle><description>Objectives To present Emergency Preparedness, Resilience and Response (EPRR) guidance for Hospital Transfusion Teams on behalf of the National Blood Transfusion Committee emergency planning working group. Background The Civil Contingencies Act 2004 requires healthcare organisations to demonstrate that they can deal with major incidents while maintaining critical services. Recent mass casualty events and the use of transfusion‐based resuscitation have highlighted the evolving role of the Hospital Transfusion Team. Methods This multi‐disciplinary advice is informed by recent global and national experience, the 2018 NHS England clinical guidelines for Major Incidents, and stakeholder workshops. Guidance Transfusion staff should be familiar with local EPRR plans including casualty type and numbers. Staff should be exercised as part of wider Trust preparation, with documented roles and responsibilities. Transfusion support should be proactive and include blood issue, regulatory compliance and sample handling. Robust LIMS‐compatible emergency identification systems are essential to minimise errors. Emergency stock management requires rapid assessment of existing stock and estimated demand before re‐ordering. Initial demand should be based on 2 to 4 red blood cells (RBC) per patient admitted. Patients with significant haemorrhage may require further red cells and early haemostatic support. Where “universal” components are demanded, they should be gender appropriate. Senior staff should lead the response, log and communicate key decisions, and prepare for post‐incident recovery. Conclusions Transfusion teams have an important role in ensuring continuity of transfusion support. Teams should develop their EPRR plans based on local plans and national guidance. Emergency preparedness should include post‐incident debriefing for ongoing staff support and future service improvement.</description><subject>Blood Safety - standards</subject><subject>Blood Transfusion - standards</subject><subject>Civil Defense - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Civil Defense - standards</subject><subject>emergency planning</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Hospitals - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>major incidents</subject><subject>Mass Casualty Incidents</subject><subject>transfusion</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>0958-7578</issn><issn>1365-3148</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9P2zAUxy0EoqXjwD-AcgRpKf4RO-ll0oQ6Nq1ol_bCxbKdl2KU2JmdDPW_n0sBbQd8sez30ec9vS9CFwTPSTo3QwdzQoXgR2hKmOA5I0V1jKZ4wau85GU1QWcxPmFMGF3QUzRhFFMsqmKKHpYdhC04s8v6AL0KUDuI8XMWINrWpgJkytX7Z-9dhGw72lrtfxsfss3P7NHH3g6qzYagXGzGaL3LBlBd_IROGtVGOH-9Z2jzbbm-_Z6vft39uP26yk1BOM-pwloIVZOy0Fo1BGvDhIGa0EZRWtVaU1oKUgpcqdIUAmNdCINNvRAFa5hmM_Tl4O1H3UFtwKVRWtkH26mwk15Z-X_F2Ue59X9kyVLPRZEEV6-C4H-PEAfZ2WigbZUDP0ZJGU_7FLzkCb0-oCb4GAM0720IlvssZMpCvmSR2Mt_53on35afgJsD8Gxb2H1skuv75UH5F4bPldM</recordid><startdate>202006</startdate><enddate>202006</enddate><creator>Doughty, Heidi</creator><creator>Chowdhury, Fateha</creator><creator>Ameh, V</creator><creator>Batrick, N</creator><creator>Baxter, L</creator><creator>Bolton–Maggs, P</creator><creator>Cowdrey, T</creator><creator>Glasgow, S</creator><creator>Jackson, A</creator><creator>Robinson, S</creator><creator>Smith, M</creator><creator>Staves, J</creator><creator>Sorour, Y</creator><creator>Pendry, K</creator><creator>Uprichard, J</creator><creator>Weaver, A</creator><creator>Wilkes, C</creator><creator>Allard, S</creator><creator>Murphy, M</creator><creator>Kendrick, C.</creator><creator>Doughty, H</creator><creator>Earley, J</creator><creator>Frith, L</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4328-1204</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5444-6222</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202006</creationdate><title>Emergency preparedness, resilience and response guidance for UK hospital transfusion teams</title><author>Doughty, Heidi ; Chowdhury, Fateha ; Ameh, V ; Batrick, N ; Baxter, L ; Bolton–Maggs, P ; Cowdrey, T ; Glasgow, S ; Jackson, A ; Robinson, S ; Smith, M ; Staves, J ; Sorour, Y ; Pendry, K ; Uprichard, J ; Weaver, A ; Wilkes, C ; Allard, S ; Murphy, M ; Kendrick, C. ; Doughty, H ; Earley, J ; Frith, L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4155-2a0b66ad174bbaf10bc36ced12fa228dbb227617608a7c4600b46c0cd9643f3b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Blood Safety - standards</topic><topic>Blood Transfusion - standards</topic><topic>Civil Defense - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Civil Defense - standards</topic><topic>emergency planning</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Hospitals - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>major incidents</topic><topic>Mass Casualty Incidents</topic><topic>transfusion</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Doughty, Heidi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chowdhury, Fateha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ameh, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batrick, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baxter, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolton–Maggs, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cowdrey, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glasgow, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staves, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sorour, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pendry, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uprichard, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weaver, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilkes, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allard, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kendrick, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doughty, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Earley, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frith, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>National Blood Transfusion Committee Emergency Planning Working Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the National Blood Transfusion Committee Emergency Planning Working Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Doughty, Heidi</au><au>Chowdhury, Fateha</au><au>Ameh, V</au><au>Batrick, N</au><au>Baxter, L</au><au>Bolton–Maggs, P</au><au>Cowdrey, T</au><au>Glasgow, S</au><au>Jackson, A</au><au>Robinson, S</au><au>Smith, M</au><au>Staves, J</au><au>Sorour, Y</au><au>Pendry, K</au><au>Uprichard, J</au><au>Weaver, A</au><au>Wilkes, C</au><au>Allard, S</au><au>Murphy, M</au><au>Kendrick, C.</au><au>Doughty, H</au><au>Earley, J</au><au>Frith, L</au><aucorp>National Blood Transfusion Committee Emergency Planning Working Group</aucorp><aucorp>the National Blood Transfusion Committee Emergency Planning Working Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Emergency preparedness, resilience and response guidance for UK hospital transfusion teams</atitle><jtitle>Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Transfus Med</addtitle><date>2020-06</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>177</spage><epage>185</epage><pages>177-185</pages><issn>0958-7578</issn><eissn>1365-3148</eissn><abstract>Objectives To present Emergency Preparedness, Resilience and Response (EPRR) guidance for Hospital Transfusion Teams on behalf of the National Blood Transfusion Committee emergency planning working group. Background The Civil Contingencies Act 2004 requires healthcare organisations to demonstrate that they can deal with major incidents while maintaining critical services. Recent mass casualty events and the use of transfusion‐based resuscitation have highlighted the evolving role of the Hospital Transfusion Team. Methods This multi‐disciplinary advice is informed by recent global and national experience, the 2018 NHS England clinical guidelines for Major Incidents, and stakeholder workshops. Guidance Transfusion staff should be familiar with local EPRR plans including casualty type and numbers. Staff should be exercised as part of wider Trust preparation, with documented roles and responsibilities. Transfusion support should be proactive and include blood issue, regulatory compliance and sample handling. Robust LIMS‐compatible emergency identification systems are essential to minimise errors. Emergency stock management requires rapid assessment of existing stock and estimated demand before re‐ordering. Initial demand should be based on 2 to 4 red blood cells (RBC) per patient admitted. Patients with significant haemorrhage may require further red cells and early haemostatic support. Where “universal” components are demanded, they should be gender appropriate. Senior staff should lead the response, log and communicate key decisions, and prepare for post‐incident recovery. Conclusions Transfusion teams have an important role in ensuring continuity of transfusion support. Teams should develop their EPRR plans based on local plans and national guidance. Emergency preparedness should include post‐incident debriefing for ongoing staff support and future service improvement.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>32020684</pmid><doi>10.1111/tme.12665</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4328-1204</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5444-6222</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0958-7578
ispartof Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England), 2020-06, Vol.30 (3), p.177-185
issn 0958-7578
1365-3148
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7317494
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Blood Safety - standards
Blood Transfusion - standards
Civil Defense - organization & administration
Civil Defense - standards
emergency planning
Guidelines
Hospitals - standards
Humans
major incidents
Mass Casualty Incidents
transfusion
United Kingdom
title Emergency preparedness, resilience and response guidance for UK hospital transfusion teams
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T20%3A50%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Emergency%20preparedness,%20resilience%20and%20response%20guidance%20for%20UK%20hospital%20transfusion%20teams&rft.jtitle=Transfusion%20medicine%20(Oxford,%20England)&rft.au=Doughty,%20Heidi&rft.aucorp=National%20Blood%20Transfusion%20Committee%20Emergency%20Planning%20Working%20Group&rft.date=2020-06&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=177&rft.epage=185&rft.pages=177-185&rft.issn=0958-7578&rft.eissn=1365-3148&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/tme.12665&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2351486575%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2351486575&rft_id=info:pmid/32020684&rfr_iscdi=true