Recommendations for rosacea diagnosis, classification and management: update from the global ROSacea COnsensus 2019 panel

Summary Background A transition from a subtyping to a phenotyping approach in rosacea is underway, allowing individual patient management according to presenting features instead of categorization by predefined subtypes. The ROSacea COnsensus (ROSCO) 2017 recommendations further support this transit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of dermatology (1951) 2020-05, Vol.182 (5), p.1269-1276
Hauptverfasser: Schaller, M., Almeida, L.M.C., Bewley, A., Cribier, B., Del Rosso, J., Dlova, N.C., Gallo, R.L., Granstein, R.D., Kautz, G., Mannis, M.J., Micali, G., Oon, H.H., Rajagopalan, M., Steinhoff, M., Tanghetti, E., Thiboutot, D., Troielli, P., Webster, G., Zierhut, M., Zuuren, E.J., Tan, J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1276
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1269
container_title British journal of dermatology (1951)
container_volume 182
creator Schaller, M.
Almeida, L.M.C.
Bewley, A.
Cribier, B.
Del Rosso, J.
Dlova, N.C.
Gallo, R.L.
Granstein, R.D.
Kautz, G.
Mannis, M.J.
Micali, G.
Oon, H.H.
Rajagopalan, M.
Steinhoff, M.
Tanghetti, E.
Thiboutot, D.
Troielli, P.
Webster, G.
Zierhut, M.
Zuuren, E.J.
Tan, J.
description Summary Background A transition from a subtyping to a phenotyping approach in rosacea is underway, allowing individual patient management according to presenting features instead of categorization by predefined subtypes. The ROSacea COnsensus (ROSCO) 2017 recommendations further support this transition and align with guidance from other working groups. Objectives To update and extend previous global ROSCO recommendations in line with the latest research and continue supporting uptake of the phenotype approach in rosacea through clinical tool development. Methods Nineteen dermatologists and two ophthalmologists used a modified Delphi approach to reach consensus on statements pertaining to critical aspects of rosacea diagnosis, classification and management. Voting was electronic and blinded. Results Delphi statements on which the panel achieved consensus of ≥ 75% voting ‘Agree’ or ‘Strongly agree’ are presented. The panel recommends discussing disease burden with patients during consultations, using four questions to assist conversations. The primary treatment objective should be achievement of complete clearance, owing to previously established clinical benefits for patients. Cutaneous and ocular features are defined. Treatments have been reassessed in line with recent evidence and the prior treatment algorithm updated. Combination therapy is recommended to benefit patients with multiple features. Ongoing monitoring and dialogue should take place between physician and patients, covering defined factors to maximize outcomes. A prototype clinical tool (Rosacea Tracker) and patient case studies have been developed from consensus statements. Conclusions The current survey updates previous recommendations as a basis for local guideline development and provides clinical tools to facilitate a phenotype approach in practice and improve rosacea patient management. What's already known about this topic? A transition to a phenotype approach in rosacea is underway and is being recommended by multiple working groups. New research has become available since the previous ROSCO consensus, necessitating an update and extension of recommendations. What does this study add? We offer updated global recommendations for clinical practice that account for recent research, to continue supporting the transition to a phenotype approach in rosacea. We present prototype clinical tools to facilitate use of the phenotype approach in practice and improve management of patients with rosa
doi_str_mv 10.1111/bjd.18420
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7317217</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2270019044</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p3340-c78d1bdf64637687208294e7e308aba40aae4e13384fade0b95ab20cfa3ca36b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUFv1DAQhS1ERZfCgT-ALHHpgbRjjzdOOCDRBQqo0koFztbEcbZeJXYab0D77zHbUgG-2NJ88_SeH2MvBJyJfM6bbXsmKiXhEVsILJeFFIiP2QIAdAF1icfsaUpbAIGwhCfsGAXWUku5YPtrZ-MwuNDSzseQeBcnPsVE1hFvPW1CTD695ranlHzn7QHjFFo-UKCNy6u7N3we877j3RQHvrtxfNPHhnp-vf56EFqtQ3IhzYlLEDUfKbj-GTvqqE_u-f19wr5__PBt9am4Wl9-Xr27KkZEBYXVVSuatitVibqstIRK1spph1BRQwqInHI5b6U6ah009ZIaCbYjtIRlgyfs7Z3uODeDa232O1FvxskPNO1NJG_-nQR_Yzbxh9EotBQ6C5zeC0zxdnZpZwafrOv7nCLOyUip88_WoFRGX_2HbuM8hRzPSKy1RNB1lamXfzt6sPKnlQyc3wE_fe_2D3MB5nfdJtdtDnWbiy_vDw_8BSGfnbk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2397230798</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Recommendations for rosacea diagnosis, classification and management: update from the global ROSacea COnsensus 2019 panel</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Schaller, M. ; Almeida, L.M.C. ; Bewley, A. ; Cribier, B. ; Del Rosso, J. ; Dlova, N.C. ; Gallo, R.L. ; Granstein, R.D. ; Kautz, G. ; Mannis, M.J. ; Micali, G. ; Oon, H.H. ; Rajagopalan, M. ; Steinhoff, M. ; Tanghetti, E. ; Thiboutot, D. ; Troielli, P. ; Webster, G. ; Zierhut, M. ; Zuuren, E.J. ; Tan, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Schaller, M. ; Almeida, L.M.C. ; Bewley, A. ; Cribier, B. ; Del Rosso, J. ; Dlova, N.C. ; Gallo, R.L. ; Granstein, R.D. ; Kautz, G. ; Mannis, M.J. ; Micali, G. ; Oon, H.H. ; Rajagopalan, M. ; Steinhoff, M. ; Tanghetti, E. ; Thiboutot, D. ; Troielli, P. ; Webster, G. ; Zierhut, M. ; Zuuren, E.J. ; Tan, J.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Background A transition from a subtyping to a phenotyping approach in rosacea is underway, allowing individual patient management according to presenting features instead of categorization by predefined subtypes. The ROSacea COnsensus (ROSCO) 2017 recommendations further support this transition and align with guidance from other working groups. Objectives To update and extend previous global ROSCO recommendations in line with the latest research and continue supporting uptake of the phenotype approach in rosacea through clinical tool development. Methods Nineteen dermatologists and two ophthalmologists used a modified Delphi approach to reach consensus on statements pertaining to critical aspects of rosacea diagnosis, classification and management. Voting was electronic and blinded. Results Delphi statements on which the panel achieved consensus of ≥ 75% voting ‘Agree’ or ‘Strongly agree’ are presented. The panel recommends discussing disease burden with patients during consultations, using four questions to assist conversations. The primary treatment objective should be achievement of complete clearance, owing to previously established clinical benefits for patients. Cutaneous and ocular features are defined. Treatments have been reassessed in line with recent evidence and the prior treatment algorithm updated. Combination therapy is recommended to benefit patients with multiple features. Ongoing monitoring and dialogue should take place between physician and patients, covering defined factors to maximize outcomes. A prototype clinical tool (Rosacea Tracker) and patient case studies have been developed from consensus statements. Conclusions The current survey updates previous recommendations as a basis for local guideline development and provides clinical tools to facilitate a phenotype approach in practice and improve rosacea patient management. What's already known about this topic? A transition to a phenotype approach in rosacea is underway and is being recommended by multiple working groups. New research has become available since the previous ROSCO consensus, necessitating an update and extension of recommendations. What does this study add? We offer updated global recommendations for clinical practice that account for recent research, to continue supporting the transition to a phenotype approach in rosacea. We present prototype clinical tools to facilitate use of the phenotype approach in practice and improve management of patients with rosacea. Linked Comment: Elewski. Br J Dermatol 2020; 182:1090–1091. Plain language summary available online</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-0963</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1365-2133</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2133</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/bjd.18420</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31392722</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Case studies ; Classification ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Consensus ; Cost of Illness ; Diagnosis ; Eye ; General Dermatology ; Genotype &amp; phenotype ; Humans ; Management ; Medical diagnosis ; Ophthalmologists ; Original ; Patients ; Phenotypes ; Phenotyping ; Rosacea ; Rosacea - diagnosis ; Rosacea - therapy ; Working groups</subject><ispartof>British journal of dermatology (1951), 2020-05, Vol.182 (5), p.1269-1276</ispartof><rights>2019 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists.</rights><rights>2019 The Authors. British Journal of Dermatology published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists.</rights><rights>2019. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-7930-1919 ; 0000-0001-7607-3124 ; 0000-0002-9624-4530 ; 0000-0002-2425-3905 ; 0000-0002-4780-0182</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fbjd.18420$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fbjd.18420$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31392722$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schaller, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almeida, L.M.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bewley, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cribier, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Del Rosso, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dlova, N.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallo, R.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Granstein, R.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kautz, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mannis, M.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Micali, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oon, H.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajagopalan, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinhoff, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanghetti, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thiboutot, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Troielli, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webster, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zierhut, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuuren, E.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Recommendations for rosacea diagnosis, classification and management: update from the global ROSacea COnsensus 2019 panel</title><title>British journal of dermatology (1951)</title><addtitle>Br J Dermatol</addtitle><description>Summary Background A transition from a subtyping to a phenotyping approach in rosacea is underway, allowing individual patient management according to presenting features instead of categorization by predefined subtypes. The ROSacea COnsensus (ROSCO) 2017 recommendations further support this transition and align with guidance from other working groups. Objectives To update and extend previous global ROSCO recommendations in line with the latest research and continue supporting uptake of the phenotype approach in rosacea through clinical tool development. Methods Nineteen dermatologists and two ophthalmologists used a modified Delphi approach to reach consensus on statements pertaining to critical aspects of rosacea diagnosis, classification and management. Voting was electronic and blinded. Results Delphi statements on which the panel achieved consensus of ≥ 75% voting ‘Agree’ or ‘Strongly agree’ are presented. The panel recommends discussing disease burden with patients during consultations, using four questions to assist conversations. The primary treatment objective should be achievement of complete clearance, owing to previously established clinical benefits for patients. Cutaneous and ocular features are defined. Treatments have been reassessed in line with recent evidence and the prior treatment algorithm updated. Combination therapy is recommended to benefit patients with multiple features. Ongoing monitoring and dialogue should take place between physician and patients, covering defined factors to maximize outcomes. A prototype clinical tool (Rosacea Tracker) and patient case studies have been developed from consensus statements. Conclusions The current survey updates previous recommendations as a basis for local guideline development and provides clinical tools to facilitate a phenotype approach in practice and improve rosacea patient management. What's already known about this topic? A transition to a phenotype approach in rosacea is underway and is being recommended by multiple working groups. New research has become available since the previous ROSCO consensus, necessitating an update and extension of recommendations. What does this study add? We offer updated global recommendations for clinical practice that account for recent research, to continue supporting the transition to a phenotype approach in rosacea. We present prototype clinical tools to facilitate use of the phenotype approach in practice and improve management of patients with rosacea. Linked Comment: Elewski. Br J Dermatol 2020; 182:1090–1091. Plain language summary available online</description><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Combined Modality Therapy</subject><subject>Consensus</subject><subject>Cost of Illness</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Eye</subject><subject>General Dermatology</subject><subject>Genotype &amp; phenotype</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Ophthalmologists</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Phenotypes</subject><subject>Phenotyping</subject><subject>Rosacea</subject><subject>Rosacea - diagnosis</subject><subject>Rosacea - therapy</subject><subject>Working groups</subject><issn>0007-0963</issn><issn>1365-2133</issn><issn>1365-2133</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUFv1DAQhS1ERZfCgT-ALHHpgbRjjzdOOCDRBQqo0koFztbEcbZeJXYab0D77zHbUgG-2NJ88_SeH2MvBJyJfM6bbXsmKiXhEVsILJeFFIiP2QIAdAF1icfsaUpbAIGwhCfsGAXWUku5YPtrZ-MwuNDSzseQeBcnPsVE1hFvPW1CTD695ranlHzn7QHjFFo-UKCNy6u7N3we877j3RQHvrtxfNPHhnp-vf56EFqtQ3IhzYlLEDUfKbj-GTvqqE_u-f19wr5__PBt9am4Wl9-Xr27KkZEBYXVVSuatitVibqstIRK1spph1BRQwqInHI5b6U6ah009ZIaCbYjtIRlgyfs7Z3uODeDa232O1FvxskPNO1NJG_-nQR_Yzbxh9EotBQ6C5zeC0zxdnZpZwafrOv7nCLOyUip88_WoFRGX_2HbuM8hRzPSKy1RNB1lamXfzt6sPKnlQyc3wE_fe_2D3MB5nfdJtdtDnWbiy_vDw_8BSGfnbk</recordid><startdate>202005</startdate><enddate>202005</enddate><creator>Schaller, M.</creator><creator>Almeida, L.M.C.</creator><creator>Bewley, A.</creator><creator>Cribier, B.</creator><creator>Del Rosso, J.</creator><creator>Dlova, N.C.</creator><creator>Gallo, R.L.</creator><creator>Granstein, R.D.</creator><creator>Kautz, G.</creator><creator>Mannis, M.J.</creator><creator>Micali, G.</creator><creator>Oon, H.H.</creator><creator>Rajagopalan, M.</creator><creator>Steinhoff, M.</creator><creator>Tanghetti, E.</creator><creator>Thiboutot, D.</creator><creator>Troielli, P.</creator><creator>Webster, G.</creator><creator>Zierhut, M.</creator><creator>Zuuren, E.J.</creator><creator>Tan, J.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7930-1919</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7607-3124</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9624-4530</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2425-3905</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4780-0182</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202005</creationdate><title>Recommendations for rosacea diagnosis, classification and management: update from the global ROSacea COnsensus 2019 panel</title><author>Schaller, M. ; Almeida, L.M.C. ; Bewley, A. ; Cribier, B. ; Del Rosso, J. ; Dlova, N.C. ; Gallo, R.L. ; Granstein, R.D. ; Kautz, G. ; Mannis, M.J. ; Micali, G. ; Oon, H.H. ; Rajagopalan, M. ; Steinhoff, M. ; Tanghetti, E. ; Thiboutot, D. ; Troielli, P. ; Webster, G. ; Zierhut, M. ; Zuuren, E.J. ; Tan, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p3340-c78d1bdf64637687208294e7e308aba40aae4e13384fade0b95ab20cfa3ca36b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Combined Modality Therapy</topic><topic>Consensus</topic><topic>Cost of Illness</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Eye</topic><topic>General Dermatology</topic><topic>Genotype &amp; phenotype</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Ophthalmologists</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Phenotypes</topic><topic>Phenotyping</topic><topic>Rosacea</topic><topic>Rosacea - diagnosis</topic><topic>Rosacea - therapy</topic><topic>Working groups</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schaller, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almeida, L.M.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bewley, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cribier, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Del Rosso, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dlova, N.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallo, R.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Granstein, R.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kautz, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mannis, M.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Micali, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oon, H.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajagopalan, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinhoff, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanghetti, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thiboutot, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Troielli, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webster, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zierhut, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuuren, E.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of dermatology (1951)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schaller, M.</au><au>Almeida, L.M.C.</au><au>Bewley, A.</au><au>Cribier, B.</au><au>Del Rosso, J.</au><au>Dlova, N.C.</au><au>Gallo, R.L.</au><au>Granstein, R.D.</au><au>Kautz, G.</au><au>Mannis, M.J.</au><au>Micali, G.</au><au>Oon, H.H.</au><au>Rajagopalan, M.</au><au>Steinhoff, M.</au><au>Tanghetti, E.</au><au>Thiboutot, D.</au><au>Troielli, P.</au><au>Webster, G.</au><au>Zierhut, M.</au><au>Zuuren, E.J.</au><au>Tan, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Recommendations for rosacea diagnosis, classification and management: update from the global ROSacea COnsensus 2019 panel</atitle><jtitle>British journal of dermatology (1951)</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Dermatol</addtitle><date>2020-05</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>182</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1269</spage><epage>1276</epage><pages>1269-1276</pages><issn>0007-0963</issn><issn>1365-2133</issn><eissn>1365-2133</eissn><abstract>Summary Background A transition from a subtyping to a phenotyping approach in rosacea is underway, allowing individual patient management according to presenting features instead of categorization by predefined subtypes. The ROSacea COnsensus (ROSCO) 2017 recommendations further support this transition and align with guidance from other working groups. Objectives To update and extend previous global ROSCO recommendations in line with the latest research and continue supporting uptake of the phenotype approach in rosacea through clinical tool development. Methods Nineteen dermatologists and two ophthalmologists used a modified Delphi approach to reach consensus on statements pertaining to critical aspects of rosacea diagnosis, classification and management. Voting was electronic and blinded. Results Delphi statements on which the panel achieved consensus of ≥ 75% voting ‘Agree’ or ‘Strongly agree’ are presented. The panel recommends discussing disease burden with patients during consultations, using four questions to assist conversations. The primary treatment objective should be achievement of complete clearance, owing to previously established clinical benefits for patients. Cutaneous and ocular features are defined. Treatments have been reassessed in line with recent evidence and the prior treatment algorithm updated. Combination therapy is recommended to benefit patients with multiple features. Ongoing monitoring and dialogue should take place between physician and patients, covering defined factors to maximize outcomes. A prototype clinical tool (Rosacea Tracker) and patient case studies have been developed from consensus statements. Conclusions The current survey updates previous recommendations as a basis for local guideline development and provides clinical tools to facilitate a phenotype approach in practice and improve rosacea patient management. What's already known about this topic? A transition to a phenotype approach in rosacea is underway and is being recommended by multiple working groups. New research has become available since the previous ROSCO consensus, necessitating an update and extension of recommendations. What does this study add? We offer updated global recommendations for clinical practice that account for recent research, to continue supporting the transition to a phenotype approach in rosacea. We present prototype clinical tools to facilitate use of the phenotype approach in practice and improve management of patients with rosacea. Linked Comment: Elewski. Br J Dermatol 2020; 182:1090–1091. Plain language summary available online</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>31392722</pmid><doi>10.1111/bjd.18420</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7930-1919</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7607-3124</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9624-4530</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2425-3905</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4780-0182</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-0963
ispartof British journal of dermatology (1951), 2020-05, Vol.182 (5), p.1269-1276
issn 0007-0963
1365-2133
1365-2133
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7317217
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Case studies
Classification
Combined Modality Therapy
Consensus
Cost of Illness
Diagnosis
Eye
General Dermatology
Genotype & phenotype
Humans
Management
Medical diagnosis
Ophthalmologists
Original
Patients
Phenotypes
Phenotyping
Rosacea
Rosacea - diagnosis
Rosacea - therapy
Working groups
title Recommendations for rosacea diagnosis, classification and management: update from the global ROSacea COnsensus 2019 panel
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T17%3A36%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Recommendations%20for%20rosacea%20diagnosis,%20classification%20and%20management:%20update%20from%20the%20global%20ROSacea%20COnsensus%202019%20panel&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20dermatology%20(1951)&rft.au=Schaller,%20M.&rft.date=2020-05&rft.volume=182&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1269&rft.epage=1276&rft.pages=1269-1276&rft.issn=0007-0963&rft.eissn=1365-2133&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/bjd.18420&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2270019044%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2397230798&rft_id=info:pmid/31392722&rfr_iscdi=true