The Effectiveness of the KiVa Bullying Prevention Program in Wales, UK: Results from a Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
The study evaluated the implementation fidelity and effectiveness of KiVa, an evidence-based program that aims to prevent and address bullying in schools, with a particular emphasis on changing the role of bystanders. The study was a two-arm waitlist control cluster randomized controlled trial in wh...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Prevention science 2020-07, Vol.21 (5), p.615-626 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 626 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 615 |
container_title | Prevention science |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Axford, Nick Bjornstad, Gretchen Clarkson, Suzy Ukoumunne, Obioha C. Wrigley, Zoe Matthews, Justin Berry, Vashti Hutchings, Judy |
description | The study evaluated the implementation fidelity and effectiveness of KiVa, an evidence-based program that aims to prevent and address bullying in schools, with a particular emphasis on changing the role of bystanders. The study was a two-arm waitlist control cluster randomized controlled trial in which 22 primary schools (clusters) (
N
= 3214 students aged 7–11) were allocated using a 1:1 ratio to intervention (KiVa; 11 clusters,
n
= 1588 students) and a waitlist control (usual school provision; 11 clusters,
n
= 1892 children)). The trial statistician (but not schools or researchers) remained blind to allocation status. The outcomes were as follows: student-reported victimization (primary outcome) and bullying perpetration; teacher-reported child behavior and emotional well-being; and school absenteeism (administrative records). Implementation fidelity was measured using teacher-completed online records (for class lessons) and independent researcher observations (for school-wide elements). Outcome analyses involved 11 intervention schools (
n
= 1578 children) and 10 control schools (
n
= 1636 children). There was no statistically significant effect on the primary outcome of child-reported victimization (adjusted intervention/control OR 0.76; 95% CI 0.55 to 1.06;
p
= 0.11) or on the secondary outcomes. The impact on victimization was not moderated by child gender, age, or victimization status at baseline. Lesson adherence was good but exposure (lesson length) was lower than the recommended amount, and there was considerable variability in the implementation of whole school elements. The trial found insufficient evidence to conclude that KiVa had an effect on the primary outcome. A larger trial of KiVa in the UK is warranted, however, with attention to issues regarding implementation fidelity. Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN23999021 Date 10-6-13 |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11121-020-01103-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7305088</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2414911280</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-71d3590656df80171489e5ffdf41cd2520075f322cfd63bbacd7ca91b2e7cc853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtvFSEcxSdGYx_6BVwYEjcuOspzYFw00Zv6SJtomltdEi6PKQ0DFZgmde0Hl3prfSxc8Q_nx4HD6bonCL5AEPKXBSGEUQ8x7CFCkPTjvW4XMU76YRjZ_TYTMfZ0FMNOt1fKBYRoYAQ-7HYIxhRSAXe77-tzC46cs7r6KxttKSA5UNvmsf-swJslhGsfJ_Ap2yZXn2Ib05TVDHwEX1Sw5QCcHb8Cp7YsoRbgcpqBapCaZlW9BquwlGozOFXRpNl_swasUqw5hdDGdfYqPOoeOBWKfXy77ndnb4_Wq_f9ycd3H1avT3pNOa09R4awEQ5sME5AxBEVo2XOGUeRNpjh9inMtWzamYFsNkobrtWINthyrQUj-93h1vdy2czW6BYoqyAvs59VvpZJefm3Ev25nNKV5AQyKEQzeH5rkNPXxZYqZ1-0DUFFm5YiMRED5pyRsaHP_kEv0pJjiycxRXRs1QnYKLyldE6lZOvuHoOgvClZbkuWrWT5s2R5Y_30zxh3R3612gCyBUqT4mTz77v_Y_sDgpyzkA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2414911280</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effectiveness of the KiVa Bullying Prevention Program in Wales, UK: Results from a Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Axford, Nick ; Bjornstad, Gretchen ; Clarkson, Suzy ; Ukoumunne, Obioha C. ; Wrigley, Zoe ; Matthews, Justin ; Berry, Vashti ; Hutchings, Judy</creator><creatorcontrib>Axford, Nick ; Bjornstad, Gretchen ; Clarkson, Suzy ; Ukoumunne, Obioha C. ; Wrigley, Zoe ; Matthews, Justin ; Berry, Vashti ; Hutchings, Judy</creatorcontrib><description>The study evaluated the implementation fidelity and effectiveness of KiVa, an evidence-based program that aims to prevent and address bullying in schools, with a particular emphasis on changing the role of bystanders. The study was a two-arm waitlist control cluster randomized controlled trial in which 22 primary schools (clusters) (
N
= 3214 students aged 7–11) were allocated using a 1:1 ratio to intervention (KiVa; 11 clusters,
n
= 1588 students) and a waitlist control (usual school provision; 11 clusters,
n
= 1892 children)). The trial statistician (but not schools or researchers) remained blind to allocation status. The outcomes were as follows: student-reported victimization (primary outcome) and bullying perpetration; teacher-reported child behavior and emotional well-being; and school absenteeism (administrative records). Implementation fidelity was measured using teacher-completed online records (for class lessons) and independent researcher observations (for school-wide elements). Outcome analyses involved 11 intervention schools (
n
= 1578 children) and 10 control schools (
n
= 1636 children). There was no statistically significant effect on the primary outcome of child-reported victimization (adjusted intervention/control OR 0.76; 95% CI 0.55 to 1.06;
p
= 0.11) or on the secondary outcomes. The impact on victimization was not moderated by child gender, age, or victimization status at baseline. Lesson adherence was good but exposure (lesson length) was lower than the recommended amount, and there was considerable variability in the implementation of whole school elements. The trial found insufficient evidence to conclude that KiVa had an effect on the primary outcome. A larger trial of KiVa in the UK is warranted, however, with attention to issues regarding implementation fidelity. Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN23999021 Date 10-6-13</description><identifier>ISSN: 1389-4986</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-6695</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11121-020-01103-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32240480</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Absenteeism ; Bullying ; Bullying - prevention & control ; Bystanders ; Child ; Child and School Psychology ; Children ; Children & youth ; Clinical trials ; Cluster Analysis ; Elementary schools ; Emotional well being ; Evidence-Based Practice ; Female ; Fidelity ; Health Psychology ; Humans ; Implementation ; Internet ; Intervention ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Prevention ; Prevention programs ; Program Evaluation ; Public Health ; Registration ; School attendance ; Schools ; Students ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Teachers ; Victimization ; Wales ; Well being</subject><ispartof>Prevention science, 2020-07, Vol.21 (5), p.615-626</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-71d3590656df80171489e5ffdf41cd2520075f322cfd63bbacd7ca91b2e7cc853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-71d3590656df80171489e5ffdf41cd2520075f322cfd63bbacd7ca91b2e7cc853</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0551-9157 ; 0000-0003-2562-8104 ; 0000-0003-2434-2091 ; 0000-0001-6438-3731 ; 0000-0002-3909-7829 ; 0000-0002-3743-1627 ; 0000-0003-4456-787X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11121-020-01103-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11121-020-01103-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27864,27922,27923,41486,42555,51317</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32240480$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Axford, Nick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bjornstad, Gretchen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clarkson, Suzy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ukoumunne, Obioha C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wrigley, Zoe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthews, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berry, Vashti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hutchings, Judy</creatorcontrib><title>The Effectiveness of the KiVa Bullying Prevention Program in Wales, UK: Results from a Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial</title><title>Prevention science</title><addtitle>Prev Sci</addtitle><addtitle>Prev Sci</addtitle><description>The study evaluated the implementation fidelity and effectiveness of KiVa, an evidence-based program that aims to prevent and address bullying in schools, with a particular emphasis on changing the role of bystanders. The study was a two-arm waitlist control cluster randomized controlled trial in which 22 primary schools (clusters) (
N
= 3214 students aged 7–11) were allocated using a 1:1 ratio to intervention (KiVa; 11 clusters,
n
= 1588 students) and a waitlist control (usual school provision; 11 clusters,
n
= 1892 children)). The trial statistician (but not schools or researchers) remained blind to allocation status. The outcomes were as follows: student-reported victimization (primary outcome) and bullying perpetration; teacher-reported child behavior and emotional well-being; and school absenteeism (administrative records). Implementation fidelity was measured using teacher-completed online records (for class lessons) and independent researcher observations (for school-wide elements). Outcome analyses involved 11 intervention schools (
n
= 1578 children) and 10 control schools (
n
= 1636 children). There was no statistically significant effect on the primary outcome of child-reported victimization (adjusted intervention/control OR 0.76; 95% CI 0.55 to 1.06;
p
= 0.11) or on the secondary outcomes. The impact on victimization was not moderated by child gender, age, or victimization status at baseline. Lesson adherence was good but exposure (lesson length) was lower than the recommended amount, and there was considerable variability in the implementation of whole school elements. The trial found insufficient evidence to conclude that KiVa had an effect on the primary outcome. A larger trial of KiVa in the UK is warranted, however, with attention to issues regarding implementation fidelity. Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN23999021 Date 10-6-13</description><subject>Absenteeism</subject><subject>Bullying</subject><subject>Bullying - prevention & control</subject><subject>Bystanders</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child and School Psychology</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Children & youth</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Cluster Analysis</subject><subject>Elementary schools</subject><subject>Emotional well being</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Practice</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fidelity</subject><subject>Health Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Implementation</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Prevention programs</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Registration</subject><subject>School attendance</subject><subject>Schools</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Victimization</subject><subject>Wales</subject><subject>Well being</subject><issn>1389-4986</issn><issn>1573-6695</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtvFSEcxSdGYx_6BVwYEjcuOspzYFw00Zv6SJtomltdEi6PKQ0DFZgmde0Hl3prfSxc8Q_nx4HD6bonCL5AEPKXBSGEUQ8x7CFCkPTjvW4XMU76YRjZ_TYTMfZ0FMNOt1fKBYRoYAQ-7HYIxhRSAXe77-tzC46cs7r6KxttKSA5UNvmsf-swJslhGsfJ_Ap2yZXn2Ib05TVDHwEX1Sw5QCcHb8Cp7YsoRbgcpqBapCaZlW9BquwlGozOFXRpNl_swasUqw5hdDGdfYqPOoeOBWKfXy77ndnb4_Wq_f9ycd3H1avT3pNOa09R4awEQ5sME5AxBEVo2XOGUeRNpjh9inMtWzamYFsNkobrtWINthyrQUj-93h1vdy2czW6BYoqyAvs59VvpZJefm3Ev25nNKV5AQyKEQzeH5rkNPXxZYqZ1-0DUFFm5YiMRED5pyRsaHP_kEv0pJjiycxRXRs1QnYKLyldE6lZOvuHoOgvClZbkuWrWT5s2R5Y_30zxh3R3612gCyBUqT4mTz77v_Y_sDgpyzkA</recordid><startdate>20200701</startdate><enddate>20200701</enddate><creator>Axford, Nick</creator><creator>Bjornstad, Gretchen</creator><creator>Clarkson, Suzy</creator><creator>Ukoumunne, Obioha C.</creator><creator>Wrigley, Zoe</creator><creator>Matthews, Justin</creator><creator>Berry, Vashti</creator><creator>Hutchings, Judy</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0551-9157</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2562-8104</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2434-2091</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6438-3731</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3909-7829</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3743-1627</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4456-787X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200701</creationdate><title>The Effectiveness of the KiVa Bullying Prevention Program in Wales, UK: Results from a Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial</title><author>Axford, Nick ; Bjornstad, Gretchen ; Clarkson, Suzy ; Ukoumunne, Obioha C. ; Wrigley, Zoe ; Matthews, Justin ; Berry, Vashti ; Hutchings, Judy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-71d3590656df80171489e5ffdf41cd2520075f322cfd63bbacd7ca91b2e7cc853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Absenteeism</topic><topic>Bullying</topic><topic>Bullying - prevention & control</topic><topic>Bystanders</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child and School Psychology</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Children & youth</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Cluster Analysis</topic><topic>Elementary schools</topic><topic>Emotional well being</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Practice</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fidelity</topic><topic>Health Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Implementation</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Prevention programs</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Registration</topic><topic>School attendance</topic><topic>Schools</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Victimization</topic><topic>Wales</topic><topic>Well being</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Axford, Nick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bjornstad, Gretchen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clarkson, Suzy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ukoumunne, Obioha C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wrigley, Zoe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthews, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berry, Vashti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hutchings, Judy</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Prevention science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Axford, Nick</au><au>Bjornstad, Gretchen</au><au>Clarkson, Suzy</au><au>Ukoumunne, Obioha C.</au><au>Wrigley, Zoe</au><au>Matthews, Justin</au><au>Berry, Vashti</au><au>Hutchings, Judy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Effectiveness of the KiVa Bullying Prevention Program in Wales, UK: Results from a Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial</atitle><jtitle>Prevention science</jtitle><stitle>Prev Sci</stitle><addtitle>Prev Sci</addtitle><date>2020-07-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>615</spage><epage>626</epage><pages>615-626</pages><issn>1389-4986</issn><eissn>1573-6695</eissn><abstract>The study evaluated the implementation fidelity and effectiveness of KiVa, an evidence-based program that aims to prevent and address bullying in schools, with a particular emphasis on changing the role of bystanders. The study was a two-arm waitlist control cluster randomized controlled trial in which 22 primary schools (clusters) (
N
= 3214 students aged 7–11) were allocated using a 1:1 ratio to intervention (KiVa; 11 clusters,
n
= 1588 students) and a waitlist control (usual school provision; 11 clusters,
n
= 1892 children)). The trial statistician (but not schools or researchers) remained blind to allocation status. The outcomes were as follows: student-reported victimization (primary outcome) and bullying perpetration; teacher-reported child behavior and emotional well-being; and school absenteeism (administrative records). Implementation fidelity was measured using teacher-completed online records (for class lessons) and independent researcher observations (for school-wide elements). Outcome analyses involved 11 intervention schools (
n
= 1578 children) and 10 control schools (
n
= 1636 children). There was no statistically significant effect on the primary outcome of child-reported victimization (adjusted intervention/control OR 0.76; 95% CI 0.55 to 1.06;
p
= 0.11) or on the secondary outcomes. The impact on victimization was not moderated by child gender, age, or victimization status at baseline. Lesson adherence was good but exposure (lesson length) was lower than the recommended amount, and there was considerable variability in the implementation of whole school elements. The trial found insufficient evidence to conclude that KiVa had an effect on the primary outcome. A larger trial of KiVa in the UK is warranted, however, with attention to issues regarding implementation fidelity. Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN23999021 Date 10-6-13</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>32240480</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11121-020-01103-9</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0551-9157</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2562-8104</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2434-2091</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6438-3731</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3909-7829</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3743-1627</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4456-787X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1389-4986 |
ispartof | Prevention science, 2020-07, Vol.21 (5), p.615-626 |
issn | 1389-4986 1573-6695 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7305088 |
source | MEDLINE; PAIS Index; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Absenteeism Bullying Bullying - prevention & control Bystanders Child Child and School Psychology Children Children & youth Clinical trials Cluster Analysis Elementary schools Emotional well being Evidence-Based Practice Female Fidelity Health Psychology Humans Implementation Internet Intervention Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Prevention Prevention programs Program Evaluation Public Health Registration School attendance Schools Students Surveys and Questionnaires Teachers Victimization Wales Well being |
title | The Effectiveness of the KiVa Bullying Prevention Program in Wales, UK: Results from a Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T16%3A38%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effectiveness%20of%20the%20KiVa%20Bullying%20Prevention%20Program%20in%20Wales,%20UK:%20Results%20from%20a%20Pragmatic%20Cluster%20Randomized%20Controlled%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Prevention%20science&rft.au=Axford,%20Nick&rft.date=2020-07-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=615&rft.epage=626&rft.pages=615-626&rft.issn=1389-4986&rft.eissn=1573-6695&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11121-020-01103-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2414911280%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2414911280&rft_id=info:pmid/32240480&rfr_iscdi=true |