To What Extent the Emergency Physicians in Riyadh City Are Aware of Patient Radiation Exposure From Diagnostic Imaging Requested in the Emergency Department
IntroductionRadiological imaging that uses ionizing radiation in emergency departments (EDs) has increased with advances in radiological diagnostic methods. Emergency (ER) physicians’ awareness of the radiation doses and the associated cancer risks that the patients are exposed to was surveyed using...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) CA), 2020-06, Vol.12 (6), p.e8623-e8623 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e8623 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | e8623 |
container_title | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Alhawas, Abdulrahman Y Alaska, Yasser Almohaimede, Khaled Almushayqih, Musab Hamoud Altassan, Bayan Khalid Homiedan, Majid |
description | IntroductionRadiological imaging that uses ionizing radiation in emergency departments (EDs) has increased with advances in radiological diagnostic methods. Emergency (ER) physicians’ awareness of the radiation doses and the associated cancer risks that the patients are exposed to was surveyed using a questionnaire.AimsTo assess the ER physicians’ awareness of radiation doses associated with the diagnostic imaging and to describe their practice about discussing radiation risk with patients at different hospitals in Riyadh city, Saudi Arabia.MethodsA prospective, questionnaire-based observational study was conducted in 2016 among 176 ER physicians at different hospitals in Riyadh city. The percentage knowledge score and the frequency of discussing radiation risk with patients based on responses to three scenarios were rated on a visual analog scale (VAS), where a score of 100 indicated that physicians would always discuss it.ResultsThe overall mean knowledge score was 28% (95% CI: 22-34). None of the studied parameters (gender, experience, country of medical qualification, type of degree, and employment level) showed a significant correlation with the overall awareness of ED physicians about radiation exposure. Over three-quarters of physicians (77%) underestimated the lifetime risk of fatal cancer attributed to a single computed tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen. Majority of physicians (60%) reported never discussing radiation risk with patients. The frequency at which physicians were discussing radiation risk with patients varied greatly depending on the clinical scenario (mean VAS scores between 46 and 82).ConclusionsER physicians of different hospitals in Riyadh city had a varied knowledge about the radiation exposure risks, although overall the perception was inadequate. The physicians should receive education, and the diagnostic imaging request may need to include information on radiation doses and risks. |
doi_str_mv | 10.7759/cureus.8623 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7301442</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2418938695</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-c5f9172ab1c4017c1a31bf0356c86214f63471ab749eca012785028ab4c25d943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkV1rFDEUhoMottRe-QcC3giyNV8zmbkRlu22FgqWpeJlOJPJzKTsJGuSUee_-GObcYtYb3IOnDfP-XgRekvJhZRF_VFPwUzxoioZf4FOGS2rVUUr8fKf_ASdx_hACKFEMiLJa3TCWVGWgotT9Pve428DJLz9lYxLOA0Gb0cTeuP0jO-GOVptwUVsHd7ZGdoBb2ya8ToYvP4J-fUdvoNkl887aG1Ovcu0g495NHwV_IgvLfTOx2Q1vhmht67HO_N9MjGZdgE_b3ppDhDSmIFv0KsO9tGcP8Uz9PVqe7_5vLr9cn2zWd-uNJMirXTR1VQyaKgWhEpNgdOmI7wodb4LFV3JhaTQSFEbDYQyWRWEVdAIzYq2FvwMfTpyD1Mzmlbn1gH26hDsCGFWHqx6XnF2UL3_oSQnVAiWAe-fAMH_2UuNNmqz34MzfoqKCVpUnIuaZ-m7_6QPfgour7eoqppXZV1k1YejSgcfYzDd32EoUYvx6mi8Woznj1clogY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2418938695</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>To What Extent the Emergency Physicians in Riyadh City Are Aware of Patient Radiation Exposure From Diagnostic Imaging Requested in the Emergency Department</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Alhawas, Abdulrahman Y ; Alaska, Yasser ; Almohaimede, Khaled ; Almushayqih, Musab Hamoud ; Altassan, Bayan Khalid ; Homiedan, Majid</creator><creatorcontrib>Alhawas, Abdulrahman Y ; Alaska, Yasser ; Almohaimede, Khaled ; Almushayqih, Musab Hamoud ; Altassan, Bayan Khalid ; Homiedan, Majid</creatorcontrib><description>IntroductionRadiological imaging that uses ionizing radiation in emergency departments (EDs) has increased with advances in radiological diagnostic methods. Emergency (ER) physicians’ awareness of the radiation doses and the associated cancer risks that the patients are exposed to was surveyed using a questionnaire.AimsTo assess the ER physicians’ awareness of radiation doses associated with the diagnostic imaging and to describe their practice about discussing radiation risk with patients at different hospitals in Riyadh city, Saudi Arabia.MethodsA prospective, questionnaire-based observational study was conducted in 2016 among 176 ER physicians at different hospitals in Riyadh city. The percentage knowledge score and the frequency of discussing radiation risk with patients based on responses to three scenarios were rated on a visual analog scale (VAS), where a score of 100 indicated that physicians would always discuss it.ResultsThe overall mean knowledge score was 28% (95% CI: 22-34). None of the studied parameters (gender, experience, country of medical qualification, type of degree, and employment level) showed a significant correlation with the overall awareness of ED physicians about radiation exposure. Over three-quarters of physicians (77%) underestimated the lifetime risk of fatal cancer attributed to a single computed tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen. Majority of physicians (60%) reported never discussing radiation risk with patients. The frequency at which physicians were discussing radiation risk with patients varied greatly depending on the clinical scenario (mean VAS scores between 46 and 82).ConclusionsER physicians of different hospitals in Riyadh city had a varied knowledge about the radiation exposure risks, although overall the perception was inadequate. The physicians should receive education, and the diagnostic imaging request may need to include information on radiation doses and risks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7759/cureus.8623</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32566434</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Palo Alto: Cureus Inc</publisher><subject>Abdomen ; Cancer ; Emergency Medicine ; Hospitals ; Knowledge ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical imaging ; Patients ; Physicians ; Questionnaires ; Radiology ; Trauma ; X-rays</subject><ispartof>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2020-06, Vol.12 (6), p.e8623-e8623</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2020, Alhawas et al. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020, Alhawas et al. 2020 Alhawas et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-c5f9172ab1c4017c1a31bf0356c86214f63471ab749eca012785028ab4c25d943</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7301442/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7301442/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alhawas, Abdulrahman Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alaska, Yasser</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almohaimede, Khaled</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almushayqih, Musab Hamoud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Altassan, Bayan Khalid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Homiedan, Majid</creatorcontrib><title>To What Extent the Emergency Physicians in Riyadh City Are Aware of Patient Radiation Exposure From Diagnostic Imaging Requested in the Emergency Department</title><title>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</title><description>IntroductionRadiological imaging that uses ionizing radiation in emergency departments (EDs) has increased with advances in radiological diagnostic methods. Emergency (ER) physicians’ awareness of the radiation doses and the associated cancer risks that the patients are exposed to was surveyed using a questionnaire.AimsTo assess the ER physicians’ awareness of radiation doses associated with the diagnostic imaging and to describe their practice about discussing radiation risk with patients at different hospitals in Riyadh city, Saudi Arabia.MethodsA prospective, questionnaire-based observational study was conducted in 2016 among 176 ER physicians at different hospitals in Riyadh city. The percentage knowledge score and the frequency of discussing radiation risk with patients based on responses to three scenarios were rated on a visual analog scale (VAS), where a score of 100 indicated that physicians would always discuss it.ResultsThe overall mean knowledge score was 28% (95% CI: 22-34). None of the studied parameters (gender, experience, country of medical qualification, type of degree, and employment level) showed a significant correlation with the overall awareness of ED physicians about radiation exposure. Over three-quarters of physicians (77%) underestimated the lifetime risk of fatal cancer attributed to a single computed tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen. Majority of physicians (60%) reported never discussing radiation risk with patients. The frequency at which physicians were discussing radiation risk with patients varied greatly depending on the clinical scenario (mean VAS scores between 46 and 82).ConclusionsER physicians of different hospitals in Riyadh city had a varied knowledge about the radiation exposure risks, although overall the perception was inadequate. The physicians should receive education, and the diagnostic imaging request may need to include information on radiation doses and risks.</description><subject>Abdomen</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Emergency Medicine</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Trauma</subject><subject>X-rays</subject><issn>2168-8184</issn><issn>2168-8184</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkV1rFDEUhoMottRe-QcC3giyNV8zmbkRlu22FgqWpeJlOJPJzKTsJGuSUee_-GObcYtYb3IOnDfP-XgRekvJhZRF_VFPwUzxoioZf4FOGS2rVUUr8fKf_ASdx_hACKFEMiLJa3TCWVGWgotT9Pve428DJLz9lYxLOA0Gb0cTeuP0jO-GOVptwUVsHd7ZGdoBb2ya8ToYvP4J-fUdvoNkl887aG1Ovcu0g495NHwV_IgvLfTOx2Q1vhmht67HO_N9MjGZdgE_b3ppDhDSmIFv0KsO9tGcP8Uz9PVqe7_5vLr9cn2zWd-uNJMirXTR1VQyaKgWhEpNgdOmI7wodb4LFV3JhaTQSFEbDYQyWRWEVdAIzYq2FvwMfTpyD1Mzmlbn1gH26hDsCGFWHqx6XnF2UL3_oSQnVAiWAe-fAMH_2UuNNmqz34MzfoqKCVpUnIuaZ-m7_6QPfgour7eoqppXZV1k1YejSgcfYzDd32EoUYvx6mi8Woznj1clogY</recordid><startdate>20200615</startdate><enddate>20200615</enddate><creator>Alhawas, Abdulrahman Y</creator><creator>Alaska, Yasser</creator><creator>Almohaimede, Khaled</creator><creator>Almushayqih, Musab Hamoud</creator><creator>Altassan, Bayan Khalid</creator><creator>Homiedan, Majid</creator><general>Cureus Inc</general><general>Cureus</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200615</creationdate><title>To What Extent the Emergency Physicians in Riyadh City Are Aware of Patient Radiation Exposure From Diagnostic Imaging Requested in the Emergency Department</title><author>Alhawas, Abdulrahman Y ; Alaska, Yasser ; Almohaimede, Khaled ; Almushayqih, Musab Hamoud ; Altassan, Bayan Khalid ; Homiedan, Majid</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-c5f9172ab1c4017c1a31bf0356c86214f63471ab749eca012785028ab4c25d943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Abdomen</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Emergency Medicine</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Trauma</topic><topic>X-rays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alhawas, Abdulrahman Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alaska, Yasser</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almohaimede, Khaled</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almushayqih, Musab Hamoud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Altassan, Bayan Khalid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Homiedan, Majid</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alhawas, Abdulrahman Y</au><au>Alaska, Yasser</au><au>Almohaimede, Khaled</au><au>Almushayqih, Musab Hamoud</au><au>Altassan, Bayan Khalid</au><au>Homiedan, Majid</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>To What Extent the Emergency Physicians in Riyadh City Are Aware of Patient Radiation Exposure From Diagnostic Imaging Requested in the Emergency Department</atitle><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle><date>2020-06-15</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>e8623</spage><epage>e8623</epage><pages>e8623-e8623</pages><issn>2168-8184</issn><eissn>2168-8184</eissn><abstract>IntroductionRadiological imaging that uses ionizing radiation in emergency departments (EDs) has increased with advances in radiological diagnostic methods. Emergency (ER) physicians’ awareness of the radiation doses and the associated cancer risks that the patients are exposed to was surveyed using a questionnaire.AimsTo assess the ER physicians’ awareness of radiation doses associated with the diagnostic imaging and to describe their practice about discussing radiation risk with patients at different hospitals in Riyadh city, Saudi Arabia.MethodsA prospective, questionnaire-based observational study was conducted in 2016 among 176 ER physicians at different hospitals in Riyadh city. The percentage knowledge score and the frequency of discussing radiation risk with patients based on responses to three scenarios were rated on a visual analog scale (VAS), where a score of 100 indicated that physicians would always discuss it.ResultsThe overall mean knowledge score was 28% (95% CI: 22-34). None of the studied parameters (gender, experience, country of medical qualification, type of degree, and employment level) showed a significant correlation with the overall awareness of ED physicians about radiation exposure. Over three-quarters of physicians (77%) underestimated the lifetime risk of fatal cancer attributed to a single computed tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen. Majority of physicians (60%) reported never discussing radiation risk with patients. The frequency at which physicians were discussing radiation risk with patients varied greatly depending on the clinical scenario (mean VAS scores between 46 and 82).ConclusionsER physicians of different hospitals in Riyadh city had a varied knowledge about the radiation exposure risks, although overall the perception was inadequate. The physicians should receive education, and the diagnostic imaging request may need to include information on radiation doses and risks.</abstract><cop>Palo Alto</cop><pub>Cureus Inc</pub><pmid>32566434</pmid><doi>10.7759/cureus.8623</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2168-8184 |
ispartof | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2020-06, Vol.12 (6), p.e8623-e8623 |
issn | 2168-8184 2168-8184 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7301442 |
source | PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central |
subjects | Abdomen Cancer Emergency Medicine Hospitals Knowledge Medical diagnosis Medical imaging Patients Physicians Questionnaires Radiology Trauma X-rays |
title | To What Extent the Emergency Physicians in Riyadh City Are Aware of Patient Radiation Exposure From Diagnostic Imaging Requested in the Emergency Department |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T01%3A31%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=To%20What%20Extent%20the%20Emergency%20Physicians%20in%20Riyadh%20City%20Are%20Aware%20of%20Patient%20Radiation%20Exposure%20From%20Diagnostic%20Imaging%20Requested%20in%20the%20Emergency%20Department&rft.jtitle=Cur%C4%93us%20(Palo%20Alto,%20CA)&rft.au=Alhawas,%20Abdulrahman%20Y&rft.date=2020-06-15&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=e8623&rft.epage=e8623&rft.pages=e8623-e8623&rft.issn=2168-8184&rft.eissn=2168-8184&rft_id=info:doi/10.7759/cureus.8623&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2418938695%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2418938695&rft_id=info:pmid/32566434&rfr_iscdi=true |