Validity of energy social research during and after COVID-19: challenges, considerations, and responses
Measures to control the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are having unprecedented impacts on people’s lives around the world. In this paper, we argue that those conducting social research in the energy domain should give special consideration to the internal and external validity of the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Energy research & social science 2020-10, Vol.68, p.101646-101646, Article 101646 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 101646 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 101646 |
container_title | Energy research & social science |
container_volume | 68 |
creator | Fell, Michael J. Pagel, Laura Chen, Chien-fei Goldberg, Matthew H. Herberz, Mario Huebner, Gesche M. Sareen, Siddharth Hahnel, Ulf J.J. |
description | Measures to control the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are having unprecedented impacts on people’s lives around the world. In this paper, we argue that those conducting social research in the energy domain should give special consideration to the internal and external validity of their work conducted during this pandemic period. We set out a number of principles that researchers can consider to give themselves and research users greater confidence that findings and recommendations will still be applicable in years to come. Largely grounded in existing good practice guidance, our recommendations include collecting and reporting additional supporting contextual data, reviewing aspects of research design for vulnerability to validity challenges, and building in longitudinal elements where feasible. We suggest that these approaches also bring a number of opportunities to generate new insights. However, we caution that a more systemic challenge to validity of knowledge produced during this period may result from changes in the kinds of social research that it is practicable to pursue. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101646 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7293511</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2214629620302218</els_id><sourcerecordid>2437120449</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-139b2e15616ddc8b0095d9126817b507e81e6f59e18d3e538d77032b7540af923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UcFO3DAQtSpQQcAP9ORjD2TrsRMnRggJbWmLhMSl5Wo59iTrVdZe7CzS_n2zBJB66WnezLz3RppHyBdgC2Agv60XmHJecMbnQSk_kVPOoSyk4PLoHXMlT8hFzmvGGAgJJfDP5ETwRiip-Cnpn8zgnR_3NHYUA6Z-T3O03gw0YUaT7Iq6XfKhpyY4aroRE10-Pt1_L0BdUbsyw4Chx3xJbQzZO0xm9BO6fOVPHtupwXxOjjszZLx4q2fkz4-738tfxcPjz_vl7UNhS1mNBQjVcoRKgnTONi1jqnIKuGygbitWYwMou0ohNE5gJRpX10zwtq5KZjrFxRm5mX23u3aDzmIYkxn0NvmNSXsdjdf_boJf6T6-6JorUQFMBl_fDFJ83mEe9cZni8NgAsZd1rwUNXBWlmqi8plqU8w5YfdxBpg-ZKLX-hCSPoSk55Am0fUswukLLx6TztZjsOh8QjtqF_3_5H8BKwSZEA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2437120449</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validity of energy social research during and after COVID-19: challenges, considerations, and responses</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Fell, Michael J. ; Pagel, Laura ; Chen, Chien-fei ; Goldberg, Matthew H. ; Herberz, Mario ; Huebner, Gesche M. ; Sareen, Siddharth ; Hahnel, Ulf J.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fell, Michael J. ; Pagel, Laura ; Chen, Chien-fei ; Goldberg, Matthew H. ; Herberz, Mario ; Huebner, Gesche M. ; Sareen, Siddharth ; Hahnel, Ulf J.J.</creatorcontrib><description>Measures to control the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are having unprecedented impacts on people’s lives around the world. In this paper, we argue that those conducting social research in the energy domain should give special consideration to the internal and external validity of their work conducted during this pandemic period. We set out a number of principles that researchers can consider to give themselves and research users greater confidence that findings and recommendations will still be applicable in years to come. Largely grounded in existing good practice guidance, our recommendations include collecting and reporting additional supporting contextual data, reviewing aspects of research design for vulnerability to validity challenges, and building in longitudinal elements where feasible. We suggest that these approaches also bring a number of opportunities to generate new insights. However, we caution that a more systemic challenge to validity of knowledge produced during this period may result from changes in the kinds of social research that it is practicable to pursue.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2214-6296</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2214-6326</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2214-6296</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101646</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32839692</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>COVID-19 ; Energy ; Social science ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Energy research & social science, 2020-10, Vol.68, p.101646-101646, Article 101646</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-139b2e15616ddc8b0095d9126817b507e81e6f59e18d3e538d77032b7540af923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-139b2e15616ddc8b0095d9126817b507e81e6f59e18d3e538d77032b7540af923</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fell, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pagel, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chien-fei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldberg, Matthew H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herberz, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huebner, Gesche M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sareen, Siddharth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hahnel, Ulf J.J.</creatorcontrib><title>Validity of energy social research during and after COVID-19: challenges, considerations, and responses</title><title>Energy research & social science</title><description>Measures to control the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are having unprecedented impacts on people’s lives around the world. In this paper, we argue that those conducting social research in the energy domain should give special consideration to the internal and external validity of their work conducted during this pandemic period. We set out a number of principles that researchers can consider to give themselves and research users greater confidence that findings and recommendations will still be applicable in years to come. Largely grounded in existing good practice guidance, our recommendations include collecting and reporting additional supporting contextual data, reviewing aspects of research design for vulnerability to validity challenges, and building in longitudinal elements where feasible. We suggest that these approaches also bring a number of opportunities to generate new insights. However, we caution that a more systemic challenge to validity of knowledge produced during this period may result from changes in the kinds of social research that it is practicable to pursue.</description><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Social science</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>2214-6296</issn><issn>2214-6326</issn><issn>2214-6296</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UcFO3DAQtSpQQcAP9ORjD2TrsRMnRggJbWmLhMSl5Wo59iTrVdZe7CzS_n2zBJB66WnezLz3RppHyBdgC2Agv60XmHJecMbnQSk_kVPOoSyk4PLoHXMlT8hFzmvGGAgJJfDP5ETwRiip-Cnpn8zgnR_3NHYUA6Z-T3O03gw0YUaT7Iq6XfKhpyY4aroRE10-Pt1_L0BdUbsyw4Chx3xJbQzZO0xm9BO6fOVPHtupwXxOjjszZLx4q2fkz4-738tfxcPjz_vl7UNhS1mNBQjVcoRKgnTONi1jqnIKuGygbitWYwMou0ohNE5gJRpX10zwtq5KZjrFxRm5mX23u3aDzmIYkxn0NvmNSXsdjdf_boJf6T6-6JorUQFMBl_fDFJ83mEe9cZni8NgAsZd1rwUNXBWlmqi8plqU8w5YfdxBpg-ZKLX-hCSPoSk55Am0fUswukLLx6TztZjsOh8QjtqF_3_5H8BKwSZEA</recordid><startdate>20201001</startdate><enddate>20201001</enddate><creator>Fell, Michael J.</creator><creator>Pagel, Laura</creator><creator>Chen, Chien-fei</creator><creator>Goldberg, Matthew H.</creator><creator>Herberz, Mario</creator><creator>Huebner, Gesche M.</creator><creator>Sareen, Siddharth</creator><creator>Hahnel, Ulf J.J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201001</creationdate><title>Validity of energy social research during and after COVID-19: challenges, considerations, and responses</title><author>Fell, Michael J. ; Pagel, Laura ; Chen, Chien-fei ; Goldberg, Matthew H. ; Herberz, Mario ; Huebner, Gesche M. ; Sareen, Siddharth ; Hahnel, Ulf J.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-139b2e15616ddc8b0095d9126817b507e81e6f59e18d3e538d77032b7540af923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Social science</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fell, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pagel, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chien-fei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldberg, Matthew H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herberz, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huebner, Gesche M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sareen, Siddharth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hahnel, Ulf J.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Energy research & social science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fell, Michael J.</au><au>Pagel, Laura</au><au>Chen, Chien-fei</au><au>Goldberg, Matthew H.</au><au>Herberz, Mario</au><au>Huebner, Gesche M.</au><au>Sareen, Siddharth</au><au>Hahnel, Ulf J.J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validity of energy social research during and after COVID-19: challenges, considerations, and responses</atitle><jtitle>Energy research & social science</jtitle><date>2020-10-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>68</volume><spage>101646</spage><epage>101646</epage><pages>101646-101646</pages><artnum>101646</artnum><issn>2214-6296</issn><eissn>2214-6326</eissn><eissn>2214-6296</eissn><abstract>Measures to control the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are having unprecedented impacts on people’s lives around the world. In this paper, we argue that those conducting social research in the energy domain should give special consideration to the internal and external validity of their work conducted during this pandemic period. We set out a number of principles that researchers can consider to give themselves and research users greater confidence that findings and recommendations will still be applicable in years to come. Largely grounded in existing good practice guidance, our recommendations include collecting and reporting additional supporting contextual data, reviewing aspects of research design for vulnerability to validity challenges, and building in longitudinal elements where feasible. We suggest that these approaches also bring a number of opportunities to generate new insights. However, we caution that a more systemic challenge to validity of knowledge produced during this period may result from changes in the kinds of social research that it is practicable to pursue.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>32839692</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.erss.2020.101646</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2214-6296 |
ispartof | Energy research & social science, 2020-10, Vol.68, p.101646-101646, Article 101646 |
issn | 2214-6296 2214-6326 2214-6296 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7293511 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | COVID-19 Energy Social science Validity |
title | Validity of energy social research during and after COVID-19: challenges, considerations, and responses |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T17%3A08%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validity%20of%20energy%20social%20research%20during%20and%20after%20COVID-19:%20challenges,%20considerations,%20and%20responses&rft.jtitle=Energy%20research%20&%20social%20science&rft.au=Fell,%20Michael%20J.&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.volume=68&rft.spage=101646&rft.epage=101646&rft.pages=101646-101646&rft.artnum=101646&rft.issn=2214-6296&rft.eissn=2214-6326&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101646&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2437120449%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2437120449&rft_id=info:pmid/32839692&rft_els_id=S2214629620302218&rfr_iscdi=true |