Validity of energy social research during and after COVID-19: challenges, considerations, and responses

Measures to control the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are having unprecedented impacts on people’s lives around the world. In this paper, we argue that those conducting social research in the energy domain should give special consideration to the internal and external validity of the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy research & social science 2020-10, Vol.68, p.101646-101646, Article 101646
Hauptverfasser: Fell, Michael J., Pagel, Laura, Chen, Chien-fei, Goldberg, Matthew H., Herberz, Mario, Huebner, Gesche M., Sareen, Siddharth, Hahnel, Ulf J.J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 101646
container_issue
container_start_page 101646
container_title Energy research & social science
container_volume 68
creator Fell, Michael J.
Pagel, Laura
Chen, Chien-fei
Goldberg, Matthew H.
Herberz, Mario
Huebner, Gesche M.
Sareen, Siddharth
Hahnel, Ulf J.J.
description Measures to control the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are having unprecedented impacts on people’s lives around the world. In this paper, we argue that those conducting social research in the energy domain should give special consideration to the internal and external validity of their work conducted during this pandemic period. We set out a number of principles that researchers can consider to give themselves and research users greater confidence that findings and recommendations will still be applicable in years to come. Largely grounded in existing good practice guidance, our recommendations include collecting and reporting additional supporting contextual data, reviewing aspects of research design for vulnerability to validity challenges, and building in longitudinal elements where feasible. We suggest that these approaches also bring a number of opportunities to generate new insights. However, we caution that a more systemic challenge to validity of knowledge produced during this period may result from changes in the kinds of social research that it is practicable to pursue.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101646
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7293511</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2214629620302218</els_id><sourcerecordid>2437120449</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-139b2e15616ddc8b0095d9126817b507e81e6f59e18d3e538d77032b7540af923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UcFO3DAQtSpQQcAP9ORjD2TrsRMnRggJbWmLhMSl5Wo59iTrVdZe7CzS_n2zBJB66WnezLz3RppHyBdgC2Agv60XmHJecMbnQSk_kVPOoSyk4PLoHXMlT8hFzmvGGAgJJfDP5ETwRiip-Cnpn8zgnR_3NHYUA6Z-T3O03gw0YUaT7Iq6XfKhpyY4aroRE10-Pt1_L0BdUbsyw4Chx3xJbQzZO0xm9BO6fOVPHtupwXxOjjszZLx4q2fkz4-738tfxcPjz_vl7UNhS1mNBQjVcoRKgnTONi1jqnIKuGygbitWYwMou0ohNE5gJRpX10zwtq5KZjrFxRm5mX23u3aDzmIYkxn0NvmNSXsdjdf_boJf6T6-6JorUQFMBl_fDFJ83mEe9cZni8NgAsZd1rwUNXBWlmqi8plqU8w5YfdxBpg-ZKLX-hCSPoSk55Am0fUswukLLx6TztZjsOh8QjtqF_3_5H8BKwSZEA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2437120449</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validity of energy social research during and after COVID-19: challenges, considerations, and responses</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Fell, Michael J. ; Pagel, Laura ; Chen, Chien-fei ; Goldberg, Matthew H. ; Herberz, Mario ; Huebner, Gesche M. ; Sareen, Siddharth ; Hahnel, Ulf J.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fell, Michael J. ; Pagel, Laura ; Chen, Chien-fei ; Goldberg, Matthew H. ; Herberz, Mario ; Huebner, Gesche M. ; Sareen, Siddharth ; Hahnel, Ulf J.J.</creatorcontrib><description>Measures to control the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are having unprecedented impacts on people’s lives around the world. In this paper, we argue that those conducting social research in the energy domain should give special consideration to the internal and external validity of their work conducted during this pandemic period. We set out a number of principles that researchers can consider to give themselves and research users greater confidence that findings and recommendations will still be applicable in years to come. Largely grounded in existing good practice guidance, our recommendations include collecting and reporting additional supporting contextual data, reviewing aspects of research design for vulnerability to validity challenges, and building in longitudinal elements where feasible. We suggest that these approaches also bring a number of opportunities to generate new insights. However, we caution that a more systemic challenge to validity of knowledge produced during this period may result from changes in the kinds of social research that it is practicable to pursue.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2214-6296</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2214-6326</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2214-6296</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101646</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32839692</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>COVID-19 ; Energy ; Social science ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Energy research &amp; social science, 2020-10, Vol.68, p.101646-101646, Article 101646</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-139b2e15616ddc8b0095d9126817b507e81e6f59e18d3e538d77032b7540af923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-139b2e15616ddc8b0095d9126817b507e81e6f59e18d3e538d77032b7540af923</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fell, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pagel, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chien-fei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldberg, Matthew H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herberz, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huebner, Gesche M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sareen, Siddharth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hahnel, Ulf J.J.</creatorcontrib><title>Validity of energy social research during and after COVID-19: challenges, considerations, and responses</title><title>Energy research &amp; social science</title><description>Measures to control the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are having unprecedented impacts on people’s lives around the world. In this paper, we argue that those conducting social research in the energy domain should give special consideration to the internal and external validity of their work conducted during this pandemic period. We set out a number of principles that researchers can consider to give themselves and research users greater confidence that findings and recommendations will still be applicable in years to come. Largely grounded in existing good practice guidance, our recommendations include collecting and reporting additional supporting contextual data, reviewing aspects of research design for vulnerability to validity challenges, and building in longitudinal elements where feasible. We suggest that these approaches also bring a number of opportunities to generate new insights. However, we caution that a more systemic challenge to validity of knowledge produced during this period may result from changes in the kinds of social research that it is practicable to pursue.</description><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Social science</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>2214-6296</issn><issn>2214-6326</issn><issn>2214-6296</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UcFO3DAQtSpQQcAP9ORjD2TrsRMnRggJbWmLhMSl5Wo59iTrVdZe7CzS_n2zBJB66WnezLz3RppHyBdgC2Agv60XmHJecMbnQSk_kVPOoSyk4PLoHXMlT8hFzmvGGAgJJfDP5ETwRiip-Cnpn8zgnR_3NHYUA6Z-T3O03gw0YUaT7Iq6XfKhpyY4aroRE10-Pt1_L0BdUbsyw4Chx3xJbQzZO0xm9BO6fOVPHtupwXxOjjszZLx4q2fkz4-738tfxcPjz_vl7UNhS1mNBQjVcoRKgnTONi1jqnIKuGygbitWYwMou0ohNE5gJRpX10zwtq5KZjrFxRm5mX23u3aDzmIYkxn0NvmNSXsdjdf_boJf6T6-6JorUQFMBl_fDFJ83mEe9cZni8NgAsZd1rwUNXBWlmqi8plqU8w5YfdxBpg-ZKLX-hCSPoSk55Am0fUswukLLx6TztZjsOh8QjtqF_3_5H8BKwSZEA</recordid><startdate>20201001</startdate><enddate>20201001</enddate><creator>Fell, Michael J.</creator><creator>Pagel, Laura</creator><creator>Chen, Chien-fei</creator><creator>Goldberg, Matthew H.</creator><creator>Herberz, Mario</creator><creator>Huebner, Gesche M.</creator><creator>Sareen, Siddharth</creator><creator>Hahnel, Ulf J.J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201001</creationdate><title>Validity of energy social research during and after COVID-19: challenges, considerations, and responses</title><author>Fell, Michael J. ; Pagel, Laura ; Chen, Chien-fei ; Goldberg, Matthew H. ; Herberz, Mario ; Huebner, Gesche M. ; Sareen, Siddharth ; Hahnel, Ulf J.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-139b2e15616ddc8b0095d9126817b507e81e6f59e18d3e538d77032b7540af923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Social science</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fell, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pagel, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chien-fei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldberg, Matthew H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herberz, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huebner, Gesche M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sareen, Siddharth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hahnel, Ulf J.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Energy research &amp; social science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fell, Michael J.</au><au>Pagel, Laura</au><au>Chen, Chien-fei</au><au>Goldberg, Matthew H.</au><au>Herberz, Mario</au><au>Huebner, Gesche M.</au><au>Sareen, Siddharth</au><au>Hahnel, Ulf J.J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validity of energy social research during and after COVID-19: challenges, considerations, and responses</atitle><jtitle>Energy research &amp; social science</jtitle><date>2020-10-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>68</volume><spage>101646</spage><epage>101646</epage><pages>101646-101646</pages><artnum>101646</artnum><issn>2214-6296</issn><eissn>2214-6326</eissn><eissn>2214-6296</eissn><abstract>Measures to control the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are having unprecedented impacts on people’s lives around the world. In this paper, we argue that those conducting social research in the energy domain should give special consideration to the internal and external validity of their work conducted during this pandemic period. We set out a number of principles that researchers can consider to give themselves and research users greater confidence that findings and recommendations will still be applicable in years to come. Largely grounded in existing good practice guidance, our recommendations include collecting and reporting additional supporting contextual data, reviewing aspects of research design for vulnerability to validity challenges, and building in longitudinal elements where feasible. We suggest that these approaches also bring a number of opportunities to generate new insights. However, we caution that a more systemic challenge to validity of knowledge produced during this period may result from changes in the kinds of social research that it is practicable to pursue.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>32839692</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.erss.2020.101646</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2214-6296
ispartof Energy research & social science, 2020-10, Vol.68, p.101646-101646, Article 101646
issn 2214-6296
2214-6326
2214-6296
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7293511
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects COVID-19
Energy
Social science
Validity
title Validity of energy social research during and after COVID-19: challenges, considerations, and responses
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T17%3A08%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validity%20of%20energy%20social%20research%20during%20and%20after%20COVID-19:%20challenges,%20considerations,%20and%20responses&rft.jtitle=Energy%20research%20&%20social%20science&rft.au=Fell,%20Michael%20J.&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.volume=68&rft.spage=101646&rft.epage=101646&rft.pages=101646-101646&rft.artnum=101646&rft.issn=2214-6296&rft.eissn=2214-6326&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101646&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2437120449%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2437120449&rft_id=info:pmid/32839692&rft_els_id=S2214629620302218&rfr_iscdi=true