The psychological and mental impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on medical staff and general public – A systematic review and meta-analysis

•We included 62 studies from 17 countries assessing psychological distress of COVID-19.•We found a high psychological burden among medical staff and the general public.•However, the psychological distress was significantly higher among patients.•We identified risk factors of psychological burdens to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychiatry research 2020-09, Vol.291, p.113190-113190, Article 113190
Hauptverfasser: Luo, Min, Guo, Lixia, Yu, Mingzhou, Jiang, Wenying, Wang, Haiyan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 113190
container_issue
container_start_page 113190
container_title Psychiatry research
container_volume 291
creator Luo, Min
Guo, Lixia
Yu, Mingzhou
Jiang, Wenying
Wang, Haiyan
description •We included 62 studies from 17 countries assessing psychological distress of COVID-19.•We found a high psychological burden among medical staff and the general public.•However, the psychological distress was significantly higher among patients.•We identified risk factors of psychological burdens to identify high-risk people.•Professional medical services should be allocated to high-risk population.•More self-help materials should be made available for people with milder impact. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused enormous psychological impact worldwide. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the psychological and mental impact of COVID-19 among healthcare workers, the general population, and patients with higher COVID-19 risk published between 1 Nov 2019 to 25 May 2020. We conducted literature research using Embase, PubMed, Google scholar and WHO COVID-19 databases. Among the initial search of 9207 studies, 62 studies with 162,639 participants from 17 countries were included in the review. The pooled prevalence of anxiety and depression was 33% (95% confidence interval: 28%-38%) and 28% (23%-32%), respectively. The prevalence of anxiety and depression was the highest among patients with pre-existing conditions and COVID-19 infection (56% [39%-73%] and 55% [48%-62%]), and it was similar between healthcare workers and the general public. Studies from China, Italy, Turkey, Spain and Iran reported higher-than-pooled prevalence among healthcare workers and the general public. Common risk factors included being women, being nurses, having lower socioeconomic status, having high risks of contracting COVID-19, and social isolation. Protective factors included having sufficient medical resources, up-to-date and accurate information, and taking precautionary measures. In conclusion, psychological interventions targeting high-risk populations with heavy psychological distress are in urgent need.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113190
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7276119</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0165178120310209</els_id><sourcerecordid>2415835673</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c537t-a29277a04a69c60db77904cfba11e8463a8e2a353a4f437d521d9ad2166f54ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUc1uEzEQXiEQDYVXqHwshw0ee9deXxBV-KtUqZfC1Zp4ZxNHm3WwN0G58Q5ceD6eBDdJKzhxsjX-_jxfUVwAnwIH9WY13aS9W0ZKU8FFHoIEw58UE2i0KDUI-bSYZGBdgm7grHiR0opzLsCY58WZFLWSuqonxa-7JbGDVOjDwjvsGQ4tW9Mw5qtfb9CNLHTMhRgG3Pm4Taz1iTARExwMu5zdfr1-X4J5zcKQee1BI43YdQelBQ0U82Sznffesd8_frIrlvZppDWOeRBp5-n7yXTEEgfs98mnl8WzDvtEr07nefHl44e72efy5vbT9ezqpnS11GOJwgitkVeojFO8nWtteOW6OQJQUymJDQmUtcSqq6RuawGtwVaAUl1dOZTnxdujbg6Y07v88RzXbqJfY9zbgN7--zL4pV2EndVCKwCTBS5PAjF821Ia7donR32PA4VtsqKCupG10jJD1RHqYkgpUvdoA9ze12pX9qFWe1-rPdaaiRd_h3ykPfSYAe-OAMqryguNNjlPg8t1RHKjbYP_n8cfWyW53g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2415835673</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The psychological and mental impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on medical staff and general public – A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Luo, Min ; Guo, Lixia ; Yu, Mingzhou ; Jiang, Wenying ; Wang, Haiyan</creator><creatorcontrib>Luo, Min ; Guo, Lixia ; Yu, Mingzhou ; Jiang, Wenying ; Wang, Haiyan</creatorcontrib><description>•We included 62 studies from 17 countries assessing psychological distress of COVID-19.•We found a high psychological burden among medical staff and the general public.•However, the psychological distress was significantly higher among patients.•We identified risk factors of psychological burdens to identify high-risk people.•Professional medical services should be allocated to high-risk population.•More self-help materials should be made available for people with milder impact. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused enormous psychological impact worldwide. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the psychological and mental impact of COVID-19 among healthcare workers, the general population, and patients with higher COVID-19 risk published between 1 Nov 2019 to 25 May 2020. We conducted literature research using Embase, PubMed, Google scholar and WHO COVID-19 databases. Among the initial search of 9207 studies, 62 studies with 162,639 participants from 17 countries were included in the review. The pooled prevalence of anxiety and depression was 33% (95% confidence interval: 28%-38%) and 28% (23%-32%), respectively. The prevalence of anxiety and depression was the highest among patients with pre-existing conditions and COVID-19 infection (56% [39%-73%] and 55% [48%-62%]), and it was similar between healthcare workers and the general public. Studies from China, Italy, Turkey, Spain and Iran reported higher-than-pooled prevalence among healthcare workers and the general public. Common risk factors included being women, being nurses, having lower socioeconomic status, having high risks of contracting COVID-19, and social isolation. Protective factors included having sufficient medical resources, up-to-date and accurate information, and taking precautionary measures. In conclusion, psychological interventions targeting high-risk populations with heavy psychological distress are in urgent need.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-1781</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7123</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113190</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32563745</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Anxiety ; Anxiety - epidemiology ; Anxiety - psychology ; Betacoronavirus ; China - epidemiology ; Coronavirus Infections - psychology ; COVID-19 ; Depression ; Depression - epidemiology ; Depression - psychology ; Health Personnel - psychology ; Humans ; Pandemics ; Pneumonia, Viral - psychology ; Prevalence ; Psychological impact ; Psychological intervention ; Review ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Stress</subject><ispartof>Psychiatry research, 2020-09, Vol.291, p.113190-113190, Article 113190</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 2020 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c537t-a29277a04a69c60db77904cfba11e8463a8e2a353a4f437d521d9ad2166f54ca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c537t-a29277a04a69c60db77904cfba11e8463a8e2a353a4f437d521d9ad2166f54ca3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113190$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32563745$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Luo, Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Lixia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Mingzhou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Wenying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Haiyan</creatorcontrib><title>The psychological and mental impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on medical staff and general public – A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>Psychiatry research</title><addtitle>Psychiatry Res</addtitle><description>•We included 62 studies from 17 countries assessing psychological distress of COVID-19.•We found a high psychological burden among medical staff and the general public.•However, the psychological distress was significantly higher among patients.•We identified risk factors of psychological burdens to identify high-risk people.•Professional medical services should be allocated to high-risk population.•More self-help materials should be made available for people with milder impact. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused enormous psychological impact worldwide. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the psychological and mental impact of COVID-19 among healthcare workers, the general population, and patients with higher COVID-19 risk published between 1 Nov 2019 to 25 May 2020. We conducted literature research using Embase, PubMed, Google scholar and WHO COVID-19 databases. Among the initial search of 9207 studies, 62 studies with 162,639 participants from 17 countries were included in the review. The pooled prevalence of anxiety and depression was 33% (95% confidence interval: 28%-38%) and 28% (23%-32%), respectively. The prevalence of anxiety and depression was the highest among patients with pre-existing conditions and COVID-19 infection (56% [39%-73%] and 55% [48%-62%]), and it was similar between healthcare workers and the general public. Studies from China, Italy, Turkey, Spain and Iran reported higher-than-pooled prevalence among healthcare workers and the general public. Common risk factors included being women, being nurses, having lower socioeconomic status, having high risks of contracting COVID-19, and social isolation. Protective factors included having sufficient medical resources, up-to-date and accurate information, and taking precautionary measures. In conclusion, psychological interventions targeting high-risk populations with heavy psychological distress are in urgent need.</description><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Anxiety - epidemiology</subject><subject>Anxiety - psychology</subject><subject>Betacoronavirus</subject><subject>China - epidemiology</subject><subject>Coronavirus Infections - psychology</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Depression</subject><subject>Depression - epidemiology</subject><subject>Depression - psychology</subject><subject>Health Personnel - psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Pneumonia, Viral - psychology</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Psychological impact</subject><subject>Psychological intervention</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><subject>Stress</subject><issn>0165-1781</issn><issn>1872-7123</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUc1uEzEQXiEQDYVXqHwshw0ee9deXxBV-KtUqZfC1Zp4ZxNHm3WwN0G58Q5ceD6eBDdJKzhxsjX-_jxfUVwAnwIH9WY13aS9W0ZKU8FFHoIEw58UE2i0KDUI-bSYZGBdgm7grHiR0opzLsCY58WZFLWSuqonxa-7JbGDVOjDwjvsGQ4tW9Mw5qtfb9CNLHTMhRgG3Pm4Taz1iTARExwMu5zdfr1-X4J5zcKQee1BI43YdQelBQ0U82Sznffesd8_frIrlvZppDWOeRBp5-n7yXTEEgfs98mnl8WzDvtEr07nefHl44e72efy5vbT9ezqpnS11GOJwgitkVeojFO8nWtteOW6OQJQUymJDQmUtcSqq6RuawGtwVaAUl1dOZTnxdujbg6Y07v88RzXbqJfY9zbgN7--zL4pV2EndVCKwCTBS5PAjF821Ia7donR32PA4VtsqKCupG10jJD1RHqYkgpUvdoA9ze12pX9qFWe1-rPdaaiRd_h3ykPfSYAe-OAMqryguNNjlPg8t1RHKjbYP_n8cfWyW53g</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Luo, Min</creator><creator>Guo, Lixia</creator><creator>Yu, Mingzhou</creator><creator>Jiang, Wenying</creator><creator>Wang, Haiyan</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>The psychological and mental impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on medical staff and general public – A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Luo, Min ; Guo, Lixia ; Yu, Mingzhou ; Jiang, Wenying ; Wang, Haiyan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c537t-a29277a04a69c60db77904cfba11e8463a8e2a353a4f437d521d9ad2166f54ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Anxiety - epidemiology</topic><topic>Anxiety - psychology</topic><topic>Betacoronavirus</topic><topic>China - epidemiology</topic><topic>Coronavirus Infections - psychology</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Depression</topic><topic>Depression - epidemiology</topic><topic>Depression - psychology</topic><topic>Health Personnel - psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Pneumonia, Viral - psychology</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Psychological impact</topic><topic>Psychological intervention</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><topic>Stress</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Luo, Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Lixia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Mingzhou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Wenying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Haiyan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Psychiatry research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Luo, Min</au><au>Guo, Lixia</au><au>Yu, Mingzhou</au><au>Jiang, Wenying</au><au>Wang, Haiyan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The psychological and mental impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on medical staff and general public – A systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Psychiatry research</jtitle><addtitle>Psychiatry Res</addtitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>291</volume><spage>113190</spage><epage>113190</epage><pages>113190-113190</pages><artnum>113190</artnum><issn>0165-1781</issn><eissn>1872-7123</eissn><abstract>•We included 62 studies from 17 countries assessing psychological distress of COVID-19.•We found a high psychological burden among medical staff and the general public.•However, the psychological distress was significantly higher among patients.•We identified risk factors of psychological burdens to identify high-risk people.•Professional medical services should be allocated to high-risk population.•More self-help materials should be made available for people with milder impact. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused enormous psychological impact worldwide. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the psychological and mental impact of COVID-19 among healthcare workers, the general population, and patients with higher COVID-19 risk published between 1 Nov 2019 to 25 May 2020. We conducted literature research using Embase, PubMed, Google scholar and WHO COVID-19 databases. Among the initial search of 9207 studies, 62 studies with 162,639 participants from 17 countries were included in the review. The pooled prevalence of anxiety and depression was 33% (95% confidence interval: 28%-38%) and 28% (23%-32%), respectively. The prevalence of anxiety and depression was the highest among patients with pre-existing conditions and COVID-19 infection (56% [39%-73%] and 55% [48%-62%]), and it was similar between healthcare workers and the general public. Studies from China, Italy, Turkey, Spain and Iran reported higher-than-pooled prevalence among healthcare workers and the general public. Common risk factors included being women, being nurses, having lower socioeconomic status, having high risks of contracting COVID-19, and social isolation. Protective factors included having sufficient medical resources, up-to-date and accurate information, and taking precautionary measures. In conclusion, psychological interventions targeting high-risk populations with heavy psychological distress are in urgent need.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>32563745</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113190</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0165-1781
ispartof Psychiatry research, 2020-09, Vol.291, p.113190-113190, Article 113190
issn 0165-1781
1872-7123
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7276119
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Anxiety
Anxiety - epidemiology
Anxiety - psychology
Betacoronavirus
China - epidemiology
Coronavirus Infections - psychology
COVID-19
Depression
Depression - epidemiology
Depression - psychology
Health Personnel - psychology
Humans
Pandemics
Pneumonia, Viral - psychology
Prevalence
Psychological impact
Psychological intervention
Review
SARS-CoV-2
Stress
title The psychological and mental impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on medical staff and general public – A systematic review and meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T07%3A44%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20psychological%20and%20mental%20impact%20of%20coronavirus%20disease%202019%20(COVID-19)%20on%20medical%20staff%20and%20general%20public%20%E2%80%93%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Psychiatry%20research&rft.au=Luo,%20Min&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=291&rft.spage=113190&rft.epage=113190&rft.pages=113190-113190&rft.artnum=113190&rft.issn=0165-1781&rft.eissn=1872-7123&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113190&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2415835673%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2415835673&rft_id=info:pmid/32563745&rft_els_id=S0165178120310209&rfr_iscdi=true