Light Therapy for Patients With Bipolar Depression: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Objective Bipolar disorder (BD) is challenging to treat, and fewer treatments are available for depressive episodes compared to mania. Light therapy is an evidence-based nonpharmacological treatment for seasonal and nonseasonal major depression, but fewer studies have examined its efficacy for patie...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian journal of psychiatry 2020-05, Vol.65 (5), p.290-300
Hauptverfasser: Lam, Raymond W., Teng, Minnie Y., Jung, Young-Eun, Evans, Vanessa C., Gottlieb, John F., Chakrabarty, Trisha, Michalak, Erin E., Murphy, Jill K., Yatham, Lakshmi N., Sit, Dorothy K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 300
container_issue 5
container_start_page 290
container_title Canadian journal of psychiatry
container_volume 65
creator Lam, Raymond W.
Teng, Minnie Y.
Jung, Young-Eun
Evans, Vanessa C.
Gottlieb, John F.
Chakrabarty, Trisha
Michalak, Erin E.
Murphy, Jill K.
Yatham, Lakshmi N.
Sit, Dorothy K.
description Objective Bipolar disorder (BD) is challenging to treat, and fewer treatments are available for depressive episodes compared to mania. Light therapy is an evidence-based nonpharmacological treatment for seasonal and nonseasonal major depression, but fewer studies have examined its efficacy for patients with BD. Hence, we reviewed the evidence for adjunctive light therapy as a treatment for bipolar depression. Methods We conducted a systematic review of databases from inception to June 30, 2019, for randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of light therapy in patients with BD (CRD42019128996). The primary outcome was change in clinician-rated depressive symptom score; secondary outcomes included clinical response, remission, acceptability, and treatment-emergent mood switches. We quantitatively pooled outcomes using meta-analysis with random-effects models. Results We identified seven trials representing 259 patients with BD. Light therapy was associated with a significant improvement in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score (standardized mean difference = 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04 to 0.82, P = 0.03). There was also a significant difference in favor of light therapy for clinical response (odds ratio [OR] = 2.32; 95% CI, 1.12 to 4.81; P = 0.024) but not for remission. There was no difference in affective switches between active light and control conditions (OR = 1.30; 95% CI, 0.38 to 4.44; P = 0.67). Study limitations included different light treatment parameters, small sample sizes, short treatment durations, and variable quality across trials. Conclusion There is positive but nonconclusive evidence that adjunctive light therapy reduces symptoms of bipolar depression and increases clinical response. Light therapy is well tolerated with no increased risk of affective switch.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0706743719892471
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7265610</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0706743719892471</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2325297700</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-b56f4d20ecadb1bc33c0356fcce0bbb212c6b55278fcc1ccecdc60ed6172e4213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFv0zAUxi3EREvhzglZ4rJLmO0kdsoBqXTAJhWBRhFHy3FeWldJHGy3Vfnr56ijg0r48qzv_fzZzx9Cryh5S6kQV0QQLrJU0GkxZZmgT9CYZlOREELzp2g8tJOhP0LPvd-QuBgrnqFRSgvGeS7GaL8wq3XAyzU41R9wbR3-poKBLnj804Q1_mB62yiHr6F34L2x3Tv8_eADtBHT-A52BvZYdRX-AkEls041B288tjW-i6ptzW-o8Nx2wdmmidulM6rxL9BFHQu8fKgT9OPTx-X8Jll8_Xw7ny0SnXEWkjLndVYxAlpVJS11mmqSRk1rIGVZMso0L_OciSJKNKq60pxAxalgkDGaTtD7o2-_LVuodBzMqUb2zrTKHaRVRv7b6cxaruxOCsZzTkk0uHwwcPbXFnyQrfEamkZ1YLdespTlbCoEGdA3Z-jGbl38kEhlhIqUx4giRY6UdtZ7B_XpMZTIIVV5nmo88vrvIU4H_sQYgeQIeLWCx1v_a3gPcuqslQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2401736471</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Light Therapy for Patients With Bipolar Depression: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Lam, Raymond W. ; Teng, Minnie Y. ; Jung, Young-Eun ; Evans, Vanessa C. ; Gottlieb, John F. ; Chakrabarty, Trisha ; Michalak, Erin E. ; Murphy, Jill K. ; Yatham, Lakshmi N. ; Sit, Dorothy K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lam, Raymond W. ; Teng, Minnie Y. ; Jung, Young-Eun ; Evans, Vanessa C. ; Gottlieb, John F. ; Chakrabarty, Trisha ; Michalak, Erin E. ; Murphy, Jill K. ; Yatham, Lakshmi N. ; Sit, Dorothy K.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective Bipolar disorder (BD) is challenging to treat, and fewer treatments are available for depressive episodes compared to mania. Light therapy is an evidence-based nonpharmacological treatment for seasonal and nonseasonal major depression, but fewer studies have examined its efficacy for patients with BD. Hence, we reviewed the evidence for adjunctive light therapy as a treatment for bipolar depression. Methods We conducted a systematic review of databases from inception to June 30, 2019, for randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of light therapy in patients with BD (CRD42019128996). The primary outcome was change in clinician-rated depressive symptom score; secondary outcomes included clinical response, remission, acceptability, and treatment-emergent mood switches. We quantitatively pooled outcomes using meta-analysis with random-effects models. Results We identified seven trials representing 259 patients with BD. Light therapy was associated with a significant improvement in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score (standardized mean difference = 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04 to 0.82, P = 0.03). There was also a significant difference in favor of light therapy for clinical response (odds ratio [OR] = 2.32; 95% CI, 1.12 to 4.81; P = 0.024) but not for remission. There was no difference in affective switches between active light and control conditions (OR = 1.30; 95% CI, 0.38 to 4.44; P = 0.67). Study limitations included different light treatment parameters, small sample sizes, short treatment durations, and variable quality across trials. Conclusion There is positive but nonconclusive evidence that adjunctive light therapy reduces symptoms of bipolar depression and increases clinical response. Light therapy is well tolerated with no increased risk of affective switch.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0706-7437</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1497-0015</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0706743719892471</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31826657</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Bipolar disorder ; Light ; Light therapy ; Mental depression ; Meta-analysis ; Systematic Review</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of psychiatry, 2020-05, Vol.65 (5), p.290-300</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2019 2019 Canadian Psychiatric Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-b56f4d20ecadb1bc33c0356fcce0bbb212c6b55278fcc1ccecdc60ed6172e4213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-b56f4d20ecadb1bc33c0356fcce0bbb212c6b55278fcc1ccecdc60ed6172e4213</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7142-4669</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7265610/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7265610/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,315,728,781,785,793,886,21821,27924,27926,27927,43623,43624,53793,53795</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31826657$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lam, Raymond W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teng, Minnie Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Young-Eun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Vanessa C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gottlieb, John F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chakrabarty, Trisha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michalak, Erin E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Jill K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yatham, Lakshmi N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sit, Dorothy K.</creatorcontrib><title>Light Therapy for Patients With Bipolar Depression: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials</title><title>Canadian journal of psychiatry</title><addtitle>Can J Psychiatry</addtitle><description>Objective Bipolar disorder (BD) is challenging to treat, and fewer treatments are available for depressive episodes compared to mania. Light therapy is an evidence-based nonpharmacological treatment for seasonal and nonseasonal major depression, but fewer studies have examined its efficacy for patients with BD. Hence, we reviewed the evidence for adjunctive light therapy as a treatment for bipolar depression. Methods We conducted a systematic review of databases from inception to June 30, 2019, for randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of light therapy in patients with BD (CRD42019128996). The primary outcome was change in clinician-rated depressive symptom score; secondary outcomes included clinical response, remission, acceptability, and treatment-emergent mood switches. We quantitatively pooled outcomes using meta-analysis with random-effects models. Results We identified seven trials representing 259 patients with BD. Light therapy was associated with a significant improvement in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score (standardized mean difference = 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04 to 0.82, P = 0.03). There was also a significant difference in favor of light therapy for clinical response (odds ratio [OR] = 2.32; 95% CI, 1.12 to 4.81; P = 0.024) but not for remission. There was no difference in affective switches between active light and control conditions (OR = 1.30; 95% CI, 0.38 to 4.44; P = 0.67). Study limitations included different light treatment parameters, small sample sizes, short treatment durations, and variable quality across trials. Conclusion There is positive but nonconclusive evidence that adjunctive light therapy reduces symptoms of bipolar depression and increases clinical response. Light therapy is well tolerated with no increased risk of affective switch.</description><subject>Bipolar disorder</subject><subject>Light</subject><subject>Light therapy</subject><subject>Mental depression</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Systematic Review</subject><issn>0706-7437</issn><issn>1497-0015</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kcFv0zAUxi3EREvhzglZ4rJLmO0kdsoBqXTAJhWBRhFHy3FeWldJHGy3Vfnr56ijg0r48qzv_fzZzx9Cryh5S6kQV0QQLrJU0GkxZZmgT9CYZlOREELzp2g8tJOhP0LPvd-QuBgrnqFRSgvGeS7GaL8wq3XAyzU41R9wbR3-poKBLnj804Q1_mB62yiHr6F34L2x3Tv8_eADtBHT-A52BvZYdRX-AkEls041B288tjW-i6ptzW-o8Nx2wdmmidulM6rxL9BFHQu8fKgT9OPTx-X8Jll8_Xw7ny0SnXEWkjLndVYxAlpVJS11mmqSRk1rIGVZMso0L_OciSJKNKq60pxAxalgkDGaTtD7o2-_LVuodBzMqUb2zrTKHaRVRv7b6cxaruxOCsZzTkk0uHwwcPbXFnyQrfEamkZ1YLdespTlbCoEGdA3Z-jGbl38kEhlhIqUx4giRY6UdtZ7B_XpMZTIIVV5nmo88vrvIU4H_sQYgeQIeLWCx1v_a3gPcuqslQ</recordid><startdate>20200501</startdate><enddate>20200501</enddate><creator>Lam, Raymond W.</creator><creator>Teng, Minnie Y.</creator><creator>Jung, Young-Eun</creator><creator>Evans, Vanessa C.</creator><creator>Gottlieb, John F.</creator><creator>Chakrabarty, Trisha</creator><creator>Michalak, Erin E.</creator><creator>Murphy, Jill K.</creator><creator>Yatham, Lakshmi N.</creator><creator>Sit, Dorothy K.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7142-4669</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200501</creationdate><title>Light Therapy for Patients With Bipolar Depression: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials</title><author>Lam, Raymond W. ; Teng, Minnie Y. ; Jung, Young-Eun ; Evans, Vanessa C. ; Gottlieb, John F. ; Chakrabarty, Trisha ; Michalak, Erin E. ; Murphy, Jill K. ; Yatham, Lakshmi N. ; Sit, Dorothy K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-b56f4d20ecadb1bc33c0356fcce0bbb212c6b55278fcc1ccecdc60ed6172e4213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Bipolar disorder</topic><topic>Light</topic><topic>Light therapy</topic><topic>Mental depression</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Systematic Review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lam, Raymond W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teng, Minnie Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Young-Eun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Vanessa C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gottlieb, John F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chakrabarty, Trisha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michalak, Erin E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Jill K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yatham, Lakshmi N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sit, Dorothy K.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of psychiatry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lam, Raymond W.</au><au>Teng, Minnie Y.</au><au>Jung, Young-Eun</au><au>Evans, Vanessa C.</au><au>Gottlieb, John F.</au><au>Chakrabarty, Trisha</au><au>Michalak, Erin E.</au><au>Murphy, Jill K.</au><au>Yatham, Lakshmi N.</au><au>Sit, Dorothy K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Light Therapy for Patients With Bipolar Depression: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of psychiatry</jtitle><addtitle>Can J Psychiatry</addtitle><date>2020-05-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>290</spage><epage>300</epage><pages>290-300</pages><issn>0706-7437</issn><eissn>1497-0015</eissn><abstract>Objective Bipolar disorder (BD) is challenging to treat, and fewer treatments are available for depressive episodes compared to mania. Light therapy is an evidence-based nonpharmacological treatment for seasonal and nonseasonal major depression, but fewer studies have examined its efficacy for patients with BD. Hence, we reviewed the evidence for adjunctive light therapy as a treatment for bipolar depression. Methods We conducted a systematic review of databases from inception to June 30, 2019, for randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of light therapy in patients with BD (CRD42019128996). The primary outcome was change in clinician-rated depressive symptom score; secondary outcomes included clinical response, remission, acceptability, and treatment-emergent mood switches. We quantitatively pooled outcomes using meta-analysis with random-effects models. Results We identified seven trials representing 259 patients with BD. Light therapy was associated with a significant improvement in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score (standardized mean difference = 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04 to 0.82, P = 0.03). There was also a significant difference in favor of light therapy for clinical response (odds ratio [OR] = 2.32; 95% CI, 1.12 to 4.81; P = 0.024) but not for remission. There was no difference in affective switches between active light and control conditions (OR = 1.30; 95% CI, 0.38 to 4.44; P = 0.67). Study limitations included different light treatment parameters, small sample sizes, short treatment durations, and variable quality across trials. Conclusion There is positive but nonconclusive evidence that adjunctive light therapy reduces symptoms of bipolar depression and increases clinical response. Light therapy is well tolerated with no increased risk of affective switch.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>31826657</pmid><doi>10.1177/0706743719892471</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7142-4669</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0706-7437
ispartof Canadian journal of psychiatry, 2020-05, Vol.65 (5), p.290-300
issn 0706-7437
1497-0015
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7265610
source Access via SAGE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Bipolar disorder
Light
Light therapy
Mental depression
Meta-analysis
Systematic Review
title Light Therapy for Patients With Bipolar Depression: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T10%3A33%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Light%20Therapy%20for%20Patients%20With%20Bipolar%20Depression:%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Meta-Analysis%20of%20Randomized%20Controlled%20Trials&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20psychiatry&rft.au=Lam,%20Raymond%20W.&rft.date=2020-05-01&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=290&rft.epage=300&rft.pages=290-300&rft.issn=0706-7437&rft.eissn=1497-0015&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0706743719892471&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2325297700%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2401736471&rft_id=info:pmid/31826657&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0706743719892471&rfr_iscdi=true