Light Therapy for Patients With Bipolar Depression: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Objective Bipolar disorder (BD) is challenging to treat, and fewer treatments are available for depressive episodes compared to mania. Light therapy is an evidence-based nonpharmacological treatment for seasonal and nonseasonal major depression, but fewer studies have examined its efficacy for patie...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian journal of psychiatry 2020-05, Vol.65 (5), p.290-300 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 300 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 290 |
container_title | Canadian journal of psychiatry |
container_volume | 65 |
creator | Lam, Raymond W. Teng, Minnie Y. Jung, Young-Eun Evans, Vanessa C. Gottlieb, John F. Chakrabarty, Trisha Michalak, Erin E. Murphy, Jill K. Yatham, Lakshmi N. Sit, Dorothy K. |
description | Objective
Bipolar disorder (BD) is challenging to treat, and fewer treatments are available for depressive episodes compared to mania. Light therapy is an evidence-based nonpharmacological treatment for seasonal and nonseasonal major depression, but fewer studies have examined its efficacy for patients with BD. Hence, we reviewed the evidence for adjunctive light therapy as a treatment for bipolar depression.
Methods
We conducted a systematic review of databases from inception to June 30, 2019, for randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of light therapy in patients with BD (CRD42019128996). The primary outcome was change in clinician-rated depressive symptom score; secondary outcomes included clinical response, remission, acceptability, and treatment-emergent mood switches. We quantitatively pooled outcomes using meta-analysis with random-effects models.
Results
We identified seven trials representing 259 patients with BD. Light therapy was associated with a significant improvement in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score (standardized mean difference = 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04 to 0.82, P = 0.03). There was also a significant difference in favor of light therapy for clinical response (odds ratio [OR] = 2.32; 95% CI, 1.12 to 4.81; P = 0.024) but not for remission. There was no difference in affective switches between active light and control conditions (OR = 1.30; 95% CI, 0.38 to 4.44; P = 0.67). Study limitations included different light treatment parameters, small sample sizes, short treatment durations, and variable quality across trials.
Conclusion
There is positive but nonconclusive evidence that adjunctive light therapy reduces symptoms of bipolar depression and increases clinical response. Light therapy is well tolerated with no increased risk of affective switch. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0706743719892471 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7265610</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0706743719892471</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2325297700</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-b56f4d20ecadb1bc33c0356fcce0bbb212c6b55278fcc1ccecdc60ed6172e4213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFv0zAUxi3EREvhzglZ4rJLmO0kdsoBqXTAJhWBRhFHy3FeWldJHGy3Vfnr56ijg0r48qzv_fzZzx9Cryh5S6kQV0QQLrJU0GkxZZmgT9CYZlOREELzp2g8tJOhP0LPvd-QuBgrnqFRSgvGeS7GaL8wq3XAyzU41R9wbR3-poKBLnj804Q1_mB62yiHr6F34L2x3Tv8_eADtBHT-A52BvZYdRX-AkEls041B288tjW-i6ptzW-o8Nx2wdmmidulM6rxL9BFHQu8fKgT9OPTx-X8Jll8_Xw7ny0SnXEWkjLndVYxAlpVJS11mmqSRk1rIGVZMso0L_OciSJKNKq60pxAxalgkDGaTtD7o2-_LVuodBzMqUb2zrTKHaRVRv7b6cxaruxOCsZzTkk0uHwwcPbXFnyQrfEamkZ1YLdespTlbCoEGdA3Z-jGbl38kEhlhIqUx4giRY6UdtZ7B_XpMZTIIVV5nmo88vrvIU4H_sQYgeQIeLWCx1v_a3gPcuqslQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2401736471</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Light Therapy for Patients With Bipolar Depression: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Lam, Raymond W. ; Teng, Minnie Y. ; Jung, Young-Eun ; Evans, Vanessa C. ; Gottlieb, John F. ; Chakrabarty, Trisha ; Michalak, Erin E. ; Murphy, Jill K. ; Yatham, Lakshmi N. ; Sit, Dorothy K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lam, Raymond W. ; Teng, Minnie Y. ; Jung, Young-Eun ; Evans, Vanessa C. ; Gottlieb, John F. ; Chakrabarty, Trisha ; Michalak, Erin E. ; Murphy, Jill K. ; Yatham, Lakshmi N. ; Sit, Dorothy K.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
Bipolar disorder (BD) is challenging to treat, and fewer treatments are available for depressive episodes compared to mania. Light therapy is an evidence-based nonpharmacological treatment for seasonal and nonseasonal major depression, but fewer studies have examined its efficacy for patients with BD. Hence, we reviewed the evidence for adjunctive light therapy as a treatment for bipolar depression.
Methods
We conducted a systematic review of databases from inception to June 30, 2019, for randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of light therapy in patients with BD (CRD42019128996). The primary outcome was change in clinician-rated depressive symptom score; secondary outcomes included clinical response, remission, acceptability, and treatment-emergent mood switches. We quantitatively pooled outcomes using meta-analysis with random-effects models.
Results
We identified seven trials representing 259 patients with BD. Light therapy was associated with a significant improvement in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score (standardized mean difference = 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04 to 0.82, P = 0.03). There was also a significant difference in favor of light therapy for clinical response (odds ratio [OR] = 2.32; 95% CI, 1.12 to 4.81; P = 0.024) but not for remission. There was no difference in affective switches between active light and control conditions (OR = 1.30; 95% CI, 0.38 to 4.44; P = 0.67). Study limitations included different light treatment parameters, small sample sizes, short treatment durations, and variable quality across trials.
Conclusion
There is positive but nonconclusive evidence that adjunctive light therapy reduces symptoms of bipolar depression and increases clinical response. Light therapy is well tolerated with no increased risk of affective switch.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0706-7437</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1497-0015</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0706743719892471</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31826657</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Bipolar disorder ; Light ; Light therapy ; Mental depression ; Meta-analysis ; Systematic Review</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of psychiatry, 2020-05, Vol.65 (5), p.290-300</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2019 2019 Canadian Psychiatric Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-b56f4d20ecadb1bc33c0356fcce0bbb212c6b55278fcc1ccecdc60ed6172e4213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-b56f4d20ecadb1bc33c0356fcce0bbb212c6b55278fcc1ccecdc60ed6172e4213</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7142-4669</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7265610/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7265610/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,315,728,781,785,793,886,21821,27924,27926,27927,43623,43624,53793,53795</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31826657$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lam, Raymond W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teng, Minnie Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Young-Eun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Vanessa C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gottlieb, John F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chakrabarty, Trisha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michalak, Erin E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Jill K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yatham, Lakshmi N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sit, Dorothy K.</creatorcontrib><title>Light Therapy for Patients With Bipolar Depression: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials</title><title>Canadian journal of psychiatry</title><addtitle>Can J Psychiatry</addtitle><description>Objective
Bipolar disorder (BD) is challenging to treat, and fewer treatments are available for depressive episodes compared to mania. Light therapy is an evidence-based nonpharmacological treatment for seasonal and nonseasonal major depression, but fewer studies have examined its efficacy for patients with BD. Hence, we reviewed the evidence for adjunctive light therapy as a treatment for bipolar depression.
Methods
We conducted a systematic review of databases from inception to June 30, 2019, for randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of light therapy in patients with BD (CRD42019128996). The primary outcome was change in clinician-rated depressive symptom score; secondary outcomes included clinical response, remission, acceptability, and treatment-emergent mood switches. We quantitatively pooled outcomes using meta-analysis with random-effects models.
Results
We identified seven trials representing 259 patients with BD. Light therapy was associated with a significant improvement in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score (standardized mean difference = 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04 to 0.82, P = 0.03). There was also a significant difference in favor of light therapy for clinical response (odds ratio [OR] = 2.32; 95% CI, 1.12 to 4.81; P = 0.024) but not for remission. There was no difference in affective switches between active light and control conditions (OR = 1.30; 95% CI, 0.38 to 4.44; P = 0.67). Study limitations included different light treatment parameters, small sample sizes, short treatment durations, and variable quality across trials.
Conclusion
There is positive but nonconclusive evidence that adjunctive light therapy reduces symptoms of bipolar depression and increases clinical response. Light therapy is well tolerated with no increased risk of affective switch.</description><subject>Bipolar disorder</subject><subject>Light</subject><subject>Light therapy</subject><subject>Mental depression</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Systematic Review</subject><issn>0706-7437</issn><issn>1497-0015</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kcFv0zAUxi3EREvhzglZ4rJLmO0kdsoBqXTAJhWBRhFHy3FeWldJHGy3Vfnr56ijg0r48qzv_fzZzx9Cryh5S6kQV0QQLrJU0GkxZZmgT9CYZlOREELzp2g8tJOhP0LPvd-QuBgrnqFRSgvGeS7GaL8wq3XAyzU41R9wbR3-poKBLnj804Q1_mB62yiHr6F34L2x3Tv8_eADtBHT-A52BvZYdRX-AkEls041B288tjW-i6ptzW-o8Nx2wdmmidulM6rxL9BFHQu8fKgT9OPTx-X8Jll8_Xw7ny0SnXEWkjLndVYxAlpVJS11mmqSRk1rIGVZMso0L_OciSJKNKq60pxAxalgkDGaTtD7o2-_LVuodBzMqUb2zrTKHaRVRv7b6cxaruxOCsZzTkk0uHwwcPbXFnyQrfEamkZ1YLdespTlbCoEGdA3Z-jGbl38kEhlhIqUx4giRY6UdtZ7B_XpMZTIIVV5nmo88vrvIU4H_sQYgeQIeLWCx1v_a3gPcuqslQ</recordid><startdate>20200501</startdate><enddate>20200501</enddate><creator>Lam, Raymond W.</creator><creator>Teng, Minnie Y.</creator><creator>Jung, Young-Eun</creator><creator>Evans, Vanessa C.</creator><creator>Gottlieb, John F.</creator><creator>Chakrabarty, Trisha</creator><creator>Michalak, Erin E.</creator><creator>Murphy, Jill K.</creator><creator>Yatham, Lakshmi N.</creator><creator>Sit, Dorothy K.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7142-4669</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200501</creationdate><title>Light Therapy for Patients With Bipolar Depression: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials</title><author>Lam, Raymond W. ; Teng, Minnie Y. ; Jung, Young-Eun ; Evans, Vanessa C. ; Gottlieb, John F. ; Chakrabarty, Trisha ; Michalak, Erin E. ; Murphy, Jill K. ; Yatham, Lakshmi N. ; Sit, Dorothy K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-b56f4d20ecadb1bc33c0356fcce0bbb212c6b55278fcc1ccecdc60ed6172e4213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Bipolar disorder</topic><topic>Light</topic><topic>Light therapy</topic><topic>Mental depression</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Systematic Review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lam, Raymond W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teng, Minnie Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Young-Eun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Vanessa C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gottlieb, John F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chakrabarty, Trisha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michalak, Erin E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Jill K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yatham, Lakshmi N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sit, Dorothy K.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of psychiatry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lam, Raymond W.</au><au>Teng, Minnie Y.</au><au>Jung, Young-Eun</au><au>Evans, Vanessa C.</au><au>Gottlieb, John F.</au><au>Chakrabarty, Trisha</au><au>Michalak, Erin E.</au><au>Murphy, Jill K.</au><au>Yatham, Lakshmi N.</au><au>Sit, Dorothy K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Light Therapy for Patients With Bipolar Depression: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of psychiatry</jtitle><addtitle>Can J Psychiatry</addtitle><date>2020-05-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>290</spage><epage>300</epage><pages>290-300</pages><issn>0706-7437</issn><eissn>1497-0015</eissn><abstract>Objective
Bipolar disorder (BD) is challenging to treat, and fewer treatments are available for depressive episodes compared to mania. Light therapy is an evidence-based nonpharmacological treatment for seasonal and nonseasonal major depression, but fewer studies have examined its efficacy for patients with BD. Hence, we reviewed the evidence for adjunctive light therapy as a treatment for bipolar depression.
Methods
We conducted a systematic review of databases from inception to June 30, 2019, for randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of light therapy in patients with BD (CRD42019128996). The primary outcome was change in clinician-rated depressive symptom score; secondary outcomes included clinical response, remission, acceptability, and treatment-emergent mood switches. We quantitatively pooled outcomes using meta-analysis with random-effects models.
Results
We identified seven trials representing 259 patients with BD. Light therapy was associated with a significant improvement in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score (standardized mean difference = 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04 to 0.82, P = 0.03). There was also a significant difference in favor of light therapy for clinical response (odds ratio [OR] = 2.32; 95% CI, 1.12 to 4.81; P = 0.024) but not for remission. There was no difference in affective switches between active light and control conditions (OR = 1.30; 95% CI, 0.38 to 4.44; P = 0.67). Study limitations included different light treatment parameters, small sample sizes, short treatment durations, and variable quality across trials.
Conclusion
There is positive but nonconclusive evidence that adjunctive light therapy reduces symptoms of bipolar depression and increases clinical response. Light therapy is well tolerated with no increased risk of affective switch.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>31826657</pmid><doi>10.1177/0706743719892471</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7142-4669</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0706-7437 |
ispartof | Canadian journal of psychiatry, 2020-05, Vol.65 (5), p.290-300 |
issn | 0706-7437 1497-0015 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7265610 |
source | Access via SAGE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Bipolar disorder Light Light therapy Mental depression Meta-analysis Systematic Review |
title | Light Therapy for Patients With Bipolar Depression: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T10%3A33%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Light%20Therapy%20for%20Patients%20With%20Bipolar%20Depression:%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Meta-Analysis%20of%20Randomized%20Controlled%20Trials&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20psychiatry&rft.au=Lam,%20Raymond%20W.&rft.date=2020-05-01&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=290&rft.epage=300&rft.pages=290-300&rft.issn=0706-7437&rft.eissn=1497-0015&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0706743719892471&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2325297700%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2401736471&rft_id=info:pmid/31826657&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0706743719892471&rfr_iscdi=true |