Flavonoid Content of Selected Foods – A Comparison of Four International Composition Tables

Flavonoid Content of Selected Foods – A Comparison of Four International Composition Tables

As part of the multinational Burden of Lung Disease (BOLD) survey, this study investigated the flavonoid content and agreement levels of foods included in BOLD’s food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), using four international flavonoid composition tables. The USDA (American), BioActive Substances in Fo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current developments in nutrition 2020-06, Vol.4 (Supplement_2), p.1155-1155, Article nzaa056_002
Hauptverfasser: Alemayohu, Mulubirhan Assefa, Zanolin, Elisabetta, Cazzoletti, Lucia, Chamitava, Liliya, Mattioli, Veronica, Plumb, Jenny, Burney, Peter GJ, Garcia-Larsen, Vanessa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Methods
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1155
container_issue Supplement_2
container_start_page 1155
container_title Current developments in nutrition
container_volume 4
creator Alemayohu, Mulubirhan Assefa
Zanolin, Elisabetta
Cazzoletti, Lucia
Chamitava, Liliya
Mattioli, Veronica
Plumb, Jenny
Burney, Peter GJ
Garcia-Larsen, Vanessa
description As part of the multinational Burden of Lung Disease (BOLD) survey, this study investigated the flavonoid content and agreement levels of foods included in BOLD’s food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), using four international flavonoid composition tables. The USDA (American), BioActive Substances in Food Information System (eBASIS; European), Indian Food Composition (IFCT), and Phenol-Explorer (European) Tables were selected for their comparable data on five subclasses of flavonoids (flavan-3-ols, flavanones, flavones, flavonols, and isoflavones). Flavonoid estimates were derived for all foods available in each table (n = 117 USDA; n = 77 eBASIS; n = 69 IFCT; n = 90 Phenol-Explorer), and comparisons were carried out for foods common between tables. Percentage differences of flavonoid content were calculated, and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs; 95% confidence intervals [95%CI]) estimated. ICC reliability was categorized as low (0.90). Compared to the USDA Table, total flavonoid content was overestimated by 181.5%, 14.1%, and 26.5%, in the eBASIS, IFCT, and Phenol-Explorer tables, respectively. Compared to Phenol-Explorer, total flavonoid content was overestimated by 53.0% in eBASIS and by 29.6% in IFCT. The reliability for total flavonoid content between the USDA and Phenol-Explorer tables was moderate (ICC 0.51; 95% CI 0.33, 0.65), low between Phenol-Explorer and eBASIS (ICC 0.27; 95% CI 0.02, 0.49), and low between Phenol-Explorer and IFCT (ICC 0.22, 95%CI –0.07, 0.48). There was good-to-excellent reliability between USDA and Phenol-Explorer for flavanones and flavones (ICC 0.93; 95%CI 0.82, 0.98; and ICC 0.86; 95%CI 0.73, 0.93, respectively). Phenol-Explorer and IFCT showed good reliability for flavanone and flavanol subclasses. ICCs for other subclasses was low across tables. Flavonoid estimates varied considerably across international tables. These differences should be taken into consideration when deriving flavonoid content in population-based surveys. MAA is funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme (Marie Sklodowska-Curie Grant Agreement). The UK’s Medical Research Council (MR/R011192/1) funds the BOLD stud.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/cdn/nzaa056_002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_TOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7259044</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/cdn/nzaa056_002</oup_id><els_id>S2475299123091734</els_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/cdn/nzaa056_002</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2672-1d3190cc0adc2aad4a07c6782e097a8ddf28c8a74613a82bf11463fa1bba3a1d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEFLwzAYhoMoOHRnrzkLdUnatc1FGMPqYODBeZTwNUk10iUl6QZ68j_4D_0lZlZkHgRPXz6-93khD0JnlFxQwtOJVHZiXwHINBeEsAM0YlkxTRjn9HDvfYzGITwTQijnPCd8hB6qFrbOOqPw3Nle2x67Bt_pVsteK1w5pwL-eHvHs3hfd-BNcHYXqdzG40UkvIXeOAvtV8AFs9vwCupWh1N01EAb9Ph7nqD76mo1v0mWt9eL-WyZSJYXLKEqpZxISUBJBqAyIIXMi5JpwgsolWpYKUsospymULK6oTTL0wZoXUMKkT5Bl0Nvt6nXWsn4DQ-t6LxZg38RDoz4fbHmSTy6rSjYlJMsiwWToUB6F4LXzQ9LidgZFtGw2DMcifOBcJvuH2E-hHWUsDXaiyCNtlIr46NooZz5k_0E4GuVqg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Flavonoid Content of Selected Foods – A Comparison of Four International Composition Tables</title><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><creator>Alemayohu, Mulubirhan Assefa ; Zanolin, Elisabetta ; Cazzoletti, Lucia ; Chamitava, Liliya ; Mattioli, Veronica ; Plumb, Jenny ; Burney, Peter GJ ; Garcia-Larsen, Vanessa</creator><creatorcontrib>Alemayohu, Mulubirhan Assefa ; Zanolin, Elisabetta ; Cazzoletti, Lucia ; Chamitava, Liliya ; Mattioli, Veronica ; Plumb, Jenny ; Burney, Peter GJ ; Garcia-Larsen, Vanessa</creatorcontrib><description>As part of the multinational Burden of Lung Disease (BOLD) survey, this study investigated the flavonoid content and agreement levels of foods included in BOLD’s food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), using four international flavonoid composition tables. The USDA (American), BioActive Substances in Food Information System (eBASIS; European), Indian Food Composition (IFCT), and Phenol-Explorer (European) Tables were selected for their comparable data on five subclasses of flavonoids (flavan-3-ols, flavanones, flavones, flavonols, and isoflavones). Flavonoid estimates were derived for all foods available in each table (n = 117 USDA; n = 77 eBASIS; n = 69 IFCT; n = 90 Phenol-Explorer), and comparisons were carried out for foods common between tables. Percentage differences of flavonoid content were calculated, and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs; 95% confidence intervals [95%CI]) estimated. ICC reliability was categorized as low (&lt;0.5), moderate (0.50–0.75), good (0.75–0.90), or excellent (&gt;0.90). Compared to the USDA Table, total flavonoid content was overestimated by 181.5%, 14.1%, and 26.5%, in the eBASIS, IFCT, and Phenol-Explorer tables, respectively. Compared to Phenol-Explorer, total flavonoid content was overestimated by 53.0% in eBASIS and by 29.6% in IFCT. The reliability for total flavonoid content between the USDA and Phenol-Explorer tables was moderate (ICC 0.51; 95% CI 0.33, 0.65), low between Phenol-Explorer and eBASIS (ICC 0.27; 95% CI 0.02, 0.49), and low between Phenol-Explorer and IFCT (ICC 0.22, 95%CI –0.07, 0.48). There was good-to-excellent reliability between USDA and Phenol-Explorer for flavanones and flavones (ICC 0.93; 95%CI 0.82, 0.98; and ICC 0.86; 95%CI 0.73, 0.93, respectively). Phenol-Explorer and IFCT showed good reliability for flavanone and flavanol subclasses. ICCs for other subclasses was low across tables. Flavonoid estimates varied considerably across international tables. These differences should be taken into consideration when deriving flavonoid content in population-based surveys. MAA is funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme (Marie Sklodowska-Curie Grant Agreement). The UK’s Medical Research Council (MR/R011192/1) funds the BOLD stud.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2475-2991</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2475-2991</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/cdn/nzaa056_002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Methods</subject><ispartof>Current developments in nutrition, 2020-06, Vol.4 (Supplement_2), p.1155-1155, Article nzaa056_002</ispartof><rights>2020 American Society for Nutrition.</rights><rights>Copyright © The Author(s) on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition 2020. 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2672-1d3190cc0adc2aad4a07c6782e097a8ddf28c8a74613a82bf11463fa1bba3a1d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7259044/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7259044/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,1598,27903,27904,53770,53772</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzaa056_002$$EView_record_in_Oxford_University_Press$$FView_record_in_$$GOxford_University_Press</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alemayohu, Mulubirhan Assefa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zanolin, Elisabetta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cazzoletti, Lucia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chamitava, Liliya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mattioli, Veronica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plumb, Jenny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burney, Peter GJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia-Larsen, Vanessa</creatorcontrib><title>Flavonoid Content of Selected Foods – A Comparison of Four International Composition Tables</title><title>Current developments in nutrition</title><description>As part of the multinational Burden of Lung Disease (BOLD) survey, this study investigated the flavonoid content and agreement levels of foods included in BOLD’s food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), using four international flavonoid composition tables. The USDA (American), BioActive Substances in Food Information System (eBASIS; European), Indian Food Composition (IFCT), and Phenol-Explorer (European) Tables were selected for their comparable data on five subclasses of flavonoids (flavan-3-ols, flavanones, flavones, flavonols, and isoflavones). Flavonoid estimates were derived for all foods available in each table (n = 117 USDA; n = 77 eBASIS; n = 69 IFCT; n = 90 Phenol-Explorer), and comparisons were carried out for foods common between tables. Percentage differences of flavonoid content were calculated, and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs; 95% confidence intervals [95%CI]) estimated. ICC reliability was categorized as low (&lt;0.5), moderate (0.50–0.75), good (0.75–0.90), or excellent (&gt;0.90). Compared to the USDA Table, total flavonoid content was overestimated by 181.5%, 14.1%, and 26.5%, in the eBASIS, IFCT, and Phenol-Explorer tables, respectively. Compared to Phenol-Explorer, total flavonoid content was overestimated by 53.0% in eBASIS and by 29.6% in IFCT. The reliability for total flavonoid content between the USDA and Phenol-Explorer tables was moderate (ICC 0.51; 95% CI 0.33, 0.65), low between Phenol-Explorer and eBASIS (ICC 0.27; 95% CI 0.02, 0.49), and low between Phenol-Explorer and IFCT (ICC 0.22, 95%CI –0.07, 0.48). There was good-to-excellent reliability between USDA and Phenol-Explorer for flavanones and flavones (ICC 0.93; 95%CI 0.82, 0.98; and ICC 0.86; 95%CI 0.73, 0.93, respectively). Phenol-Explorer and IFCT showed good reliability for flavanone and flavanol subclasses. ICCs for other subclasses was low across tables. Flavonoid estimates varied considerably across international tables. These differences should be taken into consideration when deriving flavonoid content in population-based surveys. MAA is funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme (Marie Sklodowska-Curie Grant Agreement). The UK’s Medical Research Council (MR/R011192/1) funds the BOLD stud.</description><subject>Methods</subject><issn>2475-2991</issn><issn>2475-2991</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkEFLwzAYhoMoOHRnrzkLdUnatc1FGMPqYODBeZTwNUk10iUl6QZ68j_4D_0lZlZkHgRPXz6-93khD0JnlFxQwtOJVHZiXwHINBeEsAM0YlkxTRjn9HDvfYzGITwTQijnPCd8hB6qFrbOOqPw3Nle2x67Bt_pVsteK1w5pwL-eHvHs3hfd-BNcHYXqdzG40UkvIXeOAvtV8AFs9vwCupWh1N01EAb9Ph7nqD76mo1v0mWt9eL-WyZSJYXLKEqpZxISUBJBqAyIIXMi5JpwgsolWpYKUsospymULK6oTTL0wZoXUMKkT5Bl0Nvt6nXWsn4DQ-t6LxZg38RDoz4fbHmSTy6rSjYlJMsiwWToUB6F4LXzQ9LidgZFtGw2DMcifOBcJvuH2E-hHWUsDXaiyCNtlIr46NooZz5k_0E4GuVqg</recordid><startdate>202006</startdate><enddate>202006</enddate><creator>Alemayohu, Mulubirhan Assefa</creator><creator>Zanolin, Elisabetta</creator><creator>Cazzoletti, Lucia</creator><creator>Chamitava, Liliya</creator><creator>Mattioli, Veronica</creator><creator>Plumb, Jenny</creator><creator>Burney, Peter GJ</creator><creator>Garcia-Larsen, Vanessa</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202006</creationdate><title>Flavonoid Content of Selected Foods – A Comparison of Four International Composition Tables</title><author>Alemayohu, Mulubirhan Assefa ; Zanolin, Elisabetta ; Cazzoletti, Lucia ; Chamitava, Liliya ; Mattioli, Veronica ; Plumb, Jenny ; Burney, Peter GJ ; Garcia-Larsen, Vanessa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2672-1d3190cc0adc2aad4a07c6782e097a8ddf28c8a74613a82bf11463fa1bba3a1d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alemayohu, Mulubirhan Assefa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zanolin, Elisabetta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cazzoletti, Lucia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chamitava, Liliya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mattioli, Veronica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plumb, Jenny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burney, Peter GJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia-Larsen, Vanessa</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Current developments in nutrition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alemayohu, Mulubirhan Assefa</au><au>Zanolin, Elisabetta</au><au>Cazzoletti, Lucia</au><au>Chamitava, Liliya</au><au>Mattioli, Veronica</au><au>Plumb, Jenny</au><au>Burney, Peter GJ</au><au>Garcia-Larsen, Vanessa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Flavonoid Content of Selected Foods – A Comparison of Four International Composition Tables</atitle><jtitle>Current developments in nutrition</jtitle><date>2020-06</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>Supplement_2</issue><spage>1155</spage><epage>1155</epage><pages>1155-1155</pages><artnum>nzaa056_002</artnum><issn>2475-2991</issn><eissn>2475-2991</eissn><abstract>As part of the multinational Burden of Lung Disease (BOLD) survey, this study investigated the flavonoid content and agreement levels of foods included in BOLD’s food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), using four international flavonoid composition tables. The USDA (American), BioActive Substances in Food Information System (eBASIS; European), Indian Food Composition (IFCT), and Phenol-Explorer (European) Tables were selected for their comparable data on five subclasses of flavonoids (flavan-3-ols, flavanones, flavones, flavonols, and isoflavones). Flavonoid estimates were derived for all foods available in each table (n = 117 USDA; n = 77 eBASIS; n = 69 IFCT; n = 90 Phenol-Explorer), and comparisons were carried out for foods common between tables. Percentage differences of flavonoid content were calculated, and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs; 95% confidence intervals [95%CI]) estimated. ICC reliability was categorized as low (&lt;0.5), moderate (0.50–0.75), good (0.75–0.90), or excellent (&gt;0.90). Compared to the USDA Table, total flavonoid content was overestimated by 181.5%, 14.1%, and 26.5%, in the eBASIS, IFCT, and Phenol-Explorer tables, respectively. Compared to Phenol-Explorer, total flavonoid content was overestimated by 53.0% in eBASIS and by 29.6% in IFCT. The reliability for total flavonoid content between the USDA and Phenol-Explorer tables was moderate (ICC 0.51; 95% CI 0.33, 0.65), low between Phenol-Explorer and eBASIS (ICC 0.27; 95% CI 0.02, 0.49), and low between Phenol-Explorer and IFCT (ICC 0.22, 95%CI –0.07, 0.48). There was good-to-excellent reliability between USDA and Phenol-Explorer for flavanones and flavones (ICC 0.93; 95%CI 0.82, 0.98; and ICC 0.86; 95%CI 0.73, 0.93, respectively). Phenol-Explorer and IFCT showed good reliability for flavanone and flavanol subclasses. ICCs for other subclasses was low across tables. Flavonoid estimates varied considerably across international tables. These differences should be taken into consideration when deriving flavonoid content in population-based surveys. MAA is funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme (Marie Sklodowska-Curie Grant Agreement). The UK’s Medical Research Council (MR/R011192/1) funds the BOLD stud.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1093/cdn/nzaa056_002</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 2475-2991
ispartof Current developments in nutrition, 2020-06, Vol.4 (Supplement_2), p.1155-1155, Article nzaa056_002
issn 2475-2991
2475-2991
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7259044
source Oxford Journals Open Access Collection
subjects Methods
title Flavonoid Content of Selected Foods – A Comparison of Four International Composition Tables
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T03%3A29%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_TOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Flavonoid%20Content%20of%20Selected%20Foods%20%E2%80%93%20A%20Comparison%20of%20Four%20International%20Composition%20Tables&rft.jtitle=Current%20developments%20in%20nutrition&rft.au=Alemayohu,%20Mulubirhan%20Assefa&rft.date=2020-06&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=Supplement_2&rft.spage=1155&rft.epage=1155&rft.pages=1155-1155&rft.artnum=nzaa056_002&rft.issn=2475-2991&rft.eissn=2475-2991&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/cdn/nzaa056_002&rft_dat=%3Coup_TOX%3E10.1093/cdn/nzaa056_002%3C/oup_TOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/cdn/nzaa056_002&rft_els_id=S2475299123091734&rfr_iscdi=true