Projecting Infant Weight Gain per Day to 112 Days from First 35 Days of Life

The American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Clinical Testing of Infant Formulas [1] stated, “Determination of rate of gain in weight is the single most valuable component of the clinical evaluation of an infant formula” and “recommends, that weight gain be determined over an interval of 3 to 4...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current developments in nutrition 2020-06, Vol.4 (Supplement_2), p.1163-1163, Article nzaa056_010
Hauptverfasser: Choe, Yong, Baggs, Geraldine, D’Annunzio, Genevieve, Laliberte, Alexandra, Janice, Kajzer
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1163
container_issue Supplement_2
container_start_page 1163
container_title Current developments in nutrition
container_volume 4
creator Choe, Yong
Baggs, Geraldine
D’Annunzio, Genevieve
Laliberte, Alexandra
Janice, Kajzer
description The American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Clinical Testing of Infant Formulas [1] stated, “Determination of rate of gain in weight is the single most valuable component of the clinical evaluation of an infant formula” and “recommends, that weight gain be determined over an interval of 3 to 4 months.” A gastrointestinal tolerance study (denoted ST) measured infants’ weight gain per day from 14 to 35 days of age (CW2). The objectives of this project were 1) to estimate weight gain per day from 14 to 112 days of age (CW5) using the CW2 in ST and historical data from seven 4-months growth and tolerance studies by simulation and bootstrap, and 2) to determine if ST would have supported normal physical growth in infants had the study been continued to 112 days of age by showing that the experimental formula is non-inferior to the control formula using weight gain accretion of 3 g/day as the non-inferiority margin. 1. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Nutrition, (CON-AAP). “Clinical Testing of Infant Formulas With Respect to Nutritional Suitability for Term Infants.” June 1988 (Report prepared under FDA contract 223-86-2117) (available at https://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20170722090324/https://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInformation/InfantFormula/ucm170649.htm) (accessed May 23, 2019). The simulation made use of the observed linear relationship between CW2 and CW5 from growth data in the historical studies, which included 16 formula groups. The simulated data for CW2 and CW5 were generated using multivariate normal distribution with mean vector μ and covariance matrix ∑, estimated from ST and the historical studies. In addition, the bootstrapped distribution of the difference in mean CW5 between the experimental and control groups in ST was derived using the historical studies. Software SAS® 9.4 and SAS® Enterprise Guide 7.1 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC) were used for this report. Based on the analyses, we conclude that growth observed from 14 to 35 days of age in ST when extended to 112 days of age will demonstrate normal physical growth with high probability (> 98%). Using such a predictive model may be a complementary solution for bridging growth and tolerance studies of shorter duration to 4 months for minor changes to infant formulas. Abbott Laboratories.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/cdn/nzaa056_010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_TOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7258959</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/cdn/nzaa056_010</oup_id><els_id>S2475299123091813</els_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/cdn/nzaa056_010</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2210-136308779f55df0848573f0e4ac6edce7fc0331de44e1fc5d550b06523e3719b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMFLwzAUh4MoOObOXnMW6l6apm0ugkw3BwU9KB5Dlr5sGVsy0k6Yf70dFZkHwdP78d77foePkGsGtwwkH5vaj_2n1iByBQzOyCDNCpGkUrLzk3xJRk2zBgAmpcxBDkj1EsMaTev8ks691b6l7-iWq5bOtPN0h5E-6ANtA2UsPcaG2hi2dOpi01Iu-lWwtHIWr8iF1ZsGR99zSN6mj6-Tp6R6ns0n91Vi0pRBwnjOoSwKaYWoLZRZKQpuATNtcqwNFtYA56zGLENmjaiFgAXkIuXICyYXfEju-t7dfrE9Er6NeqN20W11PKignfp98W6lluFDFakopZBdwbgvMDE0TUT7wzJQR6GqE6pOhHbETU-E_e4fz7J_xk7Ch8OoGuPQG6xd7FyrOrg_2S-Hzos4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Projecting Infant Weight Gain per Day to 112 Days from First 35 Days of Life</title><source>Oxford Academic Journals (Open Access)</source><creator>Choe, Yong ; Baggs, Geraldine ; D’Annunzio, Genevieve ; Laliberte, Alexandra ; Janice, Kajzer</creator><creatorcontrib>Choe, Yong ; Baggs, Geraldine ; D’Annunzio, Genevieve ; Laliberte, Alexandra ; Janice, Kajzer</creatorcontrib><description>The American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Clinical Testing of Infant Formulas [1] stated, “Determination of rate of gain in weight is the single most valuable component of the clinical evaluation of an infant formula” and “recommends, that weight gain be determined over an interval of 3 to 4 months.” A gastrointestinal tolerance study (denoted ST) measured infants’ weight gain per day from 14 to 35 days of age (CW2). The objectives of this project were 1) to estimate weight gain per day from 14 to 112 days of age (CW5) using the CW2 in ST and historical data from seven 4-months growth and tolerance studies by simulation and bootstrap, and 2) to determine if ST would have supported normal physical growth in infants had the study been continued to 112 days of age by showing that the experimental formula is non-inferior to the control formula using weight gain accretion of 3 g/day as the non-inferiority margin. 1. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Nutrition, (CON-AAP). “Clinical Testing of Infant Formulas With Respect to Nutritional Suitability for Term Infants.” June 1988 (Report prepared under FDA contract 223-86-2117) (available at https://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20170722090324/https://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInformation/InfantFormula/ucm170649.htm) (accessed May 23, 2019). The simulation made use of the observed linear relationship between CW2 and CW5 from growth data in the historical studies, which included 16 formula groups. The simulated data for CW2 and CW5 were generated using multivariate normal distribution with mean vector μ and covariance matrix ∑, estimated from ST and the historical studies. In addition, the bootstrapped distribution of the difference in mean CW5 between the experimental and control groups in ST was derived using the historical studies. Software SAS® 9.4 and SAS® Enterprise Guide 7.1 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC) were used for this report. Based on the analyses, we conclude that growth observed from 14 to 35 days of age in ST when extended to 112 days of age will demonstrate normal physical growth with high probability (&gt; 98%). Using such a predictive model may be a complementary solution for bridging growth and tolerance studies of shorter duration to 4 months for minor changes to infant formulas. Abbott Laboratories.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2475-2991</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2475-2991</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/cdn/nzaa056_010</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Methods</subject><ispartof>Current developments in nutrition, 2020-06, Vol.4 (Supplement_2), p.1163-1163, Article nzaa056_010</ispartof><rights>2020 American Society for Nutrition.</rights><rights>Copyright © The Author(s) on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition 2020. 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7258959/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7258959/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,1598,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzaa056_010$$EView_record_in_Oxford_University_Press$$FView_record_in_$$GOxford_University_Press</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Choe, Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baggs, Geraldine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’Annunzio, Genevieve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laliberte, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janice, Kajzer</creatorcontrib><title>Projecting Infant Weight Gain per Day to 112 Days from First 35 Days of Life</title><title>Current developments in nutrition</title><description>The American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Clinical Testing of Infant Formulas [1] stated, “Determination of rate of gain in weight is the single most valuable component of the clinical evaluation of an infant formula” and “recommends, that weight gain be determined over an interval of 3 to 4 months.” A gastrointestinal tolerance study (denoted ST) measured infants’ weight gain per day from 14 to 35 days of age (CW2). The objectives of this project were 1) to estimate weight gain per day from 14 to 112 days of age (CW5) using the CW2 in ST and historical data from seven 4-months growth and tolerance studies by simulation and bootstrap, and 2) to determine if ST would have supported normal physical growth in infants had the study been continued to 112 days of age by showing that the experimental formula is non-inferior to the control formula using weight gain accretion of 3 g/day as the non-inferiority margin. 1. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Nutrition, (CON-AAP). “Clinical Testing of Infant Formulas With Respect to Nutritional Suitability for Term Infants.” June 1988 (Report prepared under FDA contract 223-86-2117) (available at https://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20170722090324/https://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInformation/InfantFormula/ucm170649.htm) (accessed May 23, 2019). The simulation made use of the observed linear relationship between CW2 and CW5 from growth data in the historical studies, which included 16 formula groups. The simulated data for CW2 and CW5 were generated using multivariate normal distribution with mean vector μ and covariance matrix ∑, estimated from ST and the historical studies. In addition, the bootstrapped distribution of the difference in mean CW5 between the experimental and control groups in ST was derived using the historical studies. Software SAS® 9.4 and SAS® Enterprise Guide 7.1 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC) were used for this report. Based on the analyses, we conclude that growth observed from 14 to 35 days of age in ST when extended to 112 days of age will demonstrate normal physical growth with high probability (&gt; 98%). Using such a predictive model may be a complementary solution for bridging growth and tolerance studies of shorter duration to 4 months for minor changes to infant formulas. Abbott Laboratories.</description><subject>Methods</subject><issn>2475-2991</issn><issn>2475-2991</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkMFLwzAUh4MoOObOXnMW6l6apm0ugkw3BwU9KB5Dlr5sGVsy0k6Yf70dFZkHwdP78d77foePkGsGtwwkH5vaj_2n1iByBQzOyCDNCpGkUrLzk3xJRk2zBgAmpcxBDkj1EsMaTev8ks691b6l7-iWq5bOtPN0h5E-6ANtA2UsPcaG2hi2dOpi01Iu-lWwtHIWr8iF1ZsGR99zSN6mj6-Tp6R6ns0n91Vi0pRBwnjOoSwKaYWoLZRZKQpuATNtcqwNFtYA56zGLENmjaiFgAXkIuXICyYXfEju-t7dfrE9Er6NeqN20W11PKignfp98W6lluFDFakopZBdwbgvMDE0TUT7wzJQR6GqE6pOhHbETU-E_e4fz7J_xk7Ch8OoGuPQG6xd7FyrOrg_2S-Hzos4</recordid><startdate>202006</startdate><enddate>202006</enddate><creator>Choe, Yong</creator><creator>Baggs, Geraldine</creator><creator>D’Annunzio, Genevieve</creator><creator>Laliberte, Alexandra</creator><creator>Janice, Kajzer</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202006</creationdate><title>Projecting Infant Weight Gain per Day to 112 Days from First 35 Days of Life</title><author>Choe, Yong ; Baggs, Geraldine ; D’Annunzio, Genevieve ; Laliberte, Alexandra ; Janice, Kajzer</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2210-136308779f55df0848573f0e4ac6edce7fc0331de44e1fc5d550b06523e3719b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Choe, Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baggs, Geraldine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’Annunzio, Genevieve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laliberte, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janice, Kajzer</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Current developments in nutrition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Choe, Yong</au><au>Baggs, Geraldine</au><au>D’Annunzio, Genevieve</au><au>Laliberte, Alexandra</au><au>Janice, Kajzer</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Projecting Infant Weight Gain per Day to 112 Days from First 35 Days of Life</atitle><jtitle>Current developments in nutrition</jtitle><date>2020-06</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>Supplement_2</issue><spage>1163</spage><epage>1163</epage><pages>1163-1163</pages><artnum>nzaa056_010</artnum><issn>2475-2991</issn><eissn>2475-2991</eissn><abstract>The American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Clinical Testing of Infant Formulas [1] stated, “Determination of rate of gain in weight is the single most valuable component of the clinical evaluation of an infant formula” and “recommends, that weight gain be determined over an interval of 3 to 4 months.” A gastrointestinal tolerance study (denoted ST) measured infants’ weight gain per day from 14 to 35 days of age (CW2). The objectives of this project were 1) to estimate weight gain per day from 14 to 112 days of age (CW5) using the CW2 in ST and historical data from seven 4-months growth and tolerance studies by simulation and bootstrap, and 2) to determine if ST would have supported normal physical growth in infants had the study been continued to 112 days of age by showing that the experimental formula is non-inferior to the control formula using weight gain accretion of 3 g/day as the non-inferiority margin. 1. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Nutrition, (CON-AAP). “Clinical Testing of Infant Formulas With Respect to Nutritional Suitability for Term Infants.” June 1988 (Report prepared under FDA contract 223-86-2117) (available at https://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20170722090324/https://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInformation/InfantFormula/ucm170649.htm) (accessed May 23, 2019). The simulation made use of the observed linear relationship between CW2 and CW5 from growth data in the historical studies, which included 16 formula groups. The simulated data for CW2 and CW5 were generated using multivariate normal distribution with mean vector μ and covariance matrix ∑, estimated from ST and the historical studies. In addition, the bootstrapped distribution of the difference in mean CW5 between the experimental and control groups in ST was derived using the historical studies. Software SAS® 9.4 and SAS® Enterprise Guide 7.1 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC) were used for this report. Based on the analyses, we conclude that growth observed from 14 to 35 days of age in ST when extended to 112 days of age will demonstrate normal physical growth with high probability (&gt; 98%). Using such a predictive model may be a complementary solution for bridging growth and tolerance studies of shorter duration to 4 months for minor changes to infant formulas. Abbott Laboratories.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1093/cdn/nzaa056_010</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 2475-2991
ispartof Current developments in nutrition, 2020-06, Vol.4 (Supplement_2), p.1163-1163, Article nzaa056_010
issn 2475-2991
2475-2991
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7258959
source Oxford Academic Journals (Open Access)
subjects Methods
title Projecting Infant Weight Gain per Day to 112 Days from First 35 Days of Life
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T18%3A46%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_TOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Projecting%20Infant%20Weight%20Gain%20per%20Day%20to%20112%20Days%20from%20First%2035%20Days%20of%20Life&rft.jtitle=Current%20developments%20in%20nutrition&rft.au=Choe,%20Yong&rft.date=2020-06&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=Supplement_2&rft.spage=1163&rft.epage=1163&rft.pages=1163-1163&rft.artnum=nzaa056_010&rft.issn=2475-2991&rft.eissn=2475-2991&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/cdn/nzaa056_010&rft_dat=%3Coup_TOX%3E10.1093/cdn/nzaa056_010%3C/oup_TOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/cdn/nzaa056_010&rft_els_id=S2475299123091813&rfr_iscdi=true