Assessment of Clinical Research Outcomes for Personalizing Nicotinamide Riboside Dosing

Introduction: Nicotinamide riboside (NR), is a NAD + precursor that is commercially available as a nutritional supplement. NAD + levels have been shown to decline in older adults, thus NR has been identified as a healthy aging nutritional supplement. Clinical and preclinical studies have demonstrate...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current developments in nutrition 2020-06, Vol.4 (Supplement_2), p.34-34, Article nzaa040_034
Hauptverfasser: Idoine, Rebecca, Erickson, Aron, Shao, Andrew, Ishtiaq, Yusrah, Roberts, Matthew, Nkrumah-Elie, Yasmeen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 34
container_issue Supplement_2
container_start_page 34
container_title Current developments in nutrition
container_volume 4
creator Idoine, Rebecca
Erickson, Aron
Shao, Andrew
Ishtiaq, Yusrah
Roberts, Matthew
Nkrumah-Elie, Yasmeen
description Introduction: Nicotinamide riboside (NR), is a NAD + precursor that is commercially available as a nutritional supplement. NAD + levels have been shown to decline in older adults, thus NR has been identified as a healthy aging nutritional supplement. Clinical and preclinical studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of NR supplementation at various doses, however individual responsiveness have been minimally reported. As individuals differ in multiple parameters that may result in variations in response to supplementation, dosing personalization may be a key to NR supplement effectiveness. Objective: Determine if published data of clinical NR supplementation can be used to personalize NR dosing. A meta-analysis of published clinical trials of NR supplementation was conducted. Included studies were limited to those that were exclusive to NR supplementation with multiple doses for at least one week. The assessment compared NR dosing, study population demographics, changes in NAD levels, adverse effects, and study outcomes. A total of 11 publications report clinical results from NR supplementation demonstrated in 9 clinical trials (4 RCT), however only five of the studies met our criteria. Most of the studies have been conducted in both males and females with an average age of 45–65 years, with various BMIs. Dosing ranged from 100 mg/day to 2000 mg/day, for a duration of 9 days to 3 months, with no major adverse events reported. When measured, NAD + levels were shown to increase by as much as 139% with 1000 mg/day of NR for 56 days. Measurements for changes in NAD + lacked standardization in collection, analysis, and reporting, thus parallel comparisons could not be made. Additionally, studies did not separate NR responses based upon gender, age, BMI, and health status, preventing personalization of the available data. To effectively personalize NR dosing, standardization of NAD + analyses and clinical outcomes is gravely needed. Future use of phenotypic flexibility approaches may be beneficial in demonstrating the clinical benefits of NR supplementation. Lastly, it is recommended that future studies include heterogenous response study outcomes to identify responders/non-responders to various endpoints following NR supplementation. None.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/cdn/nzaa040_034
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_TOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7257021</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/cdn/nzaa040_034</oup_id><els_id>S2475299123075522</els_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/cdn/nzaa040_034</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2214-37f7803cd9aeb6e79ae7c15a1891876271dcb15d4263e9ad92d0af1789015cb33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM1LAzEUxIMoWGrPXnMW1ibZj2wuQqmfUKwUxWPIJm_byG5SkrZg_3q3rEg9CJ5m4M0MvB9Cl5RcUyLSsTZu7PZKkYxIkmYnaMAynidMCHp65M_RKMYPQggVQhREDND7JEaIsQW3wb7G08Y6q1WDFxBBBb3C8-1G-xYirn3ALxCid6qxe-uW-Nlqv7FOtdYAXtjKx4O57cQtL9BZrZoIo28dorf7u9fpYzKbPzxNJ7NEM0azJOU1L0mqjVBQFcA74ZrmipaClrxgnBpd0dxkrEhBKCOYIaqmvBSE5rpK0yG66XfX26oFo7s_gmrkOthWhU_plZW_L86u5NLvJGc5J4x2A-N-QAcfY4D6p0uJPLCVHVt5xLZrXPUNv13_Iyz6MHQQdhaCjNqC02BsAL2Rxts_u18x6pKc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of Clinical Research Outcomes for Personalizing Nicotinamide Riboside Dosing</title><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><creator>Idoine, Rebecca ; Erickson, Aron ; Shao, Andrew ; Ishtiaq, Yusrah ; Roberts, Matthew ; Nkrumah-Elie, Yasmeen</creator><creatorcontrib>Idoine, Rebecca ; Erickson, Aron ; Shao, Andrew ; Ishtiaq, Yusrah ; Roberts, Matthew ; Nkrumah-Elie, Yasmeen</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: Nicotinamide riboside (NR), is a NAD + precursor that is commercially available as a nutritional supplement. NAD + levels have been shown to decline in older adults, thus NR has been identified as a healthy aging nutritional supplement. Clinical and preclinical studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of NR supplementation at various doses, however individual responsiveness have been minimally reported. As individuals differ in multiple parameters that may result in variations in response to supplementation, dosing personalization may be a key to NR supplement effectiveness. Objective: Determine if published data of clinical NR supplementation can be used to personalize NR dosing. A meta-analysis of published clinical trials of NR supplementation was conducted. Included studies were limited to those that were exclusive to NR supplementation with multiple doses for at least one week. The assessment compared NR dosing, study population demographics, changes in NAD levels, adverse effects, and study outcomes. A total of 11 publications report clinical results from NR supplementation demonstrated in 9 clinical trials (4 RCT), however only five of the studies met our criteria. Most of the studies have been conducted in both males and females with an average age of 45–65 years, with various BMIs. Dosing ranged from 100 mg/day to 2000 mg/day, for a duration of 9 days to 3 months, with no major adverse events reported. When measured, NAD + levels were shown to increase by as much as 139% with 1000 mg/day of NR for 56 days. Measurements for changes in NAD + lacked standardization in collection, analysis, and reporting, thus parallel comparisons could not be made. Additionally, studies did not separate NR responses based upon gender, age, BMI, and health status, preventing personalization of the available data. To effectively personalize NR dosing, standardization of NAD + analyses and clinical outcomes is gravely needed. Future use of phenotypic flexibility approaches may be beneficial in demonstrating the clinical benefits of NR supplementation. Lastly, it is recommended that future studies include heterogenous response study outcomes to identify responders/non-responders to various endpoints following NR supplementation. None.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2475-2991</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2475-2991</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/cdn/nzaa040_034</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aging and Chronic Disease</subject><ispartof>Current developments in nutrition, 2020-06, Vol.4 (Supplement_2), p.34-34, Article nzaa040_034</ispartof><rights>2020 American Society for Nutrition.</rights><rights>Copyright © The Author(s) on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition 2020. 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7257021/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7257021/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,1598,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzaa040_034$$EView_record_in_Oxford_University_Press$$FView_record_in_$$GOxford_University_Press</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Idoine, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erickson, Aron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shao, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishtiaq, Yusrah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nkrumah-Elie, Yasmeen</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of Clinical Research Outcomes for Personalizing Nicotinamide Riboside Dosing</title><title>Current developments in nutrition</title><description>Introduction: Nicotinamide riboside (NR), is a NAD + precursor that is commercially available as a nutritional supplement. NAD + levels have been shown to decline in older adults, thus NR has been identified as a healthy aging nutritional supplement. Clinical and preclinical studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of NR supplementation at various doses, however individual responsiveness have been minimally reported. As individuals differ in multiple parameters that may result in variations in response to supplementation, dosing personalization may be a key to NR supplement effectiveness. Objective: Determine if published data of clinical NR supplementation can be used to personalize NR dosing. A meta-analysis of published clinical trials of NR supplementation was conducted. Included studies were limited to those that were exclusive to NR supplementation with multiple doses for at least one week. The assessment compared NR dosing, study population demographics, changes in NAD levels, adverse effects, and study outcomes. A total of 11 publications report clinical results from NR supplementation demonstrated in 9 clinical trials (4 RCT), however only five of the studies met our criteria. Most of the studies have been conducted in both males and females with an average age of 45–65 years, with various BMIs. Dosing ranged from 100 mg/day to 2000 mg/day, for a duration of 9 days to 3 months, with no major adverse events reported. When measured, NAD + levels were shown to increase by as much as 139% with 1000 mg/day of NR for 56 days. Measurements for changes in NAD + lacked standardization in collection, analysis, and reporting, thus parallel comparisons could not be made. Additionally, studies did not separate NR responses based upon gender, age, BMI, and health status, preventing personalization of the available data. To effectively personalize NR dosing, standardization of NAD + analyses and clinical outcomes is gravely needed. Future use of phenotypic flexibility approaches may be beneficial in demonstrating the clinical benefits of NR supplementation. Lastly, it is recommended that future studies include heterogenous response study outcomes to identify responders/non-responders to various endpoints following NR supplementation. None.</description><subject>Aging and Chronic Disease</subject><issn>2475-2991</issn><issn>2475-2991</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkM1LAzEUxIMoWGrPXnMW1ibZj2wuQqmfUKwUxWPIJm_byG5SkrZg_3q3rEg9CJ5m4M0MvB9Cl5RcUyLSsTZu7PZKkYxIkmYnaMAynidMCHp65M_RKMYPQggVQhREDND7JEaIsQW3wb7G08Y6q1WDFxBBBb3C8-1G-xYirn3ALxCid6qxe-uW-Nlqv7FOtdYAXtjKx4O57cQtL9BZrZoIo28dorf7u9fpYzKbPzxNJ7NEM0azJOU1L0mqjVBQFcA74ZrmipaClrxgnBpd0dxkrEhBKCOYIaqmvBSE5rpK0yG66XfX26oFo7s_gmrkOthWhU_plZW_L86u5NLvJGc5J4x2A-N-QAcfY4D6p0uJPLCVHVt5xLZrXPUNv13_Iyz6MHQQdhaCjNqC02BsAL2Rxts_u18x6pKc</recordid><startdate>202006</startdate><enddate>202006</enddate><creator>Idoine, Rebecca</creator><creator>Erickson, Aron</creator><creator>Shao, Andrew</creator><creator>Ishtiaq, Yusrah</creator><creator>Roberts, Matthew</creator><creator>Nkrumah-Elie, Yasmeen</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202006</creationdate><title>Assessment of Clinical Research Outcomes for Personalizing Nicotinamide Riboside Dosing</title><author>Idoine, Rebecca ; Erickson, Aron ; Shao, Andrew ; Ishtiaq, Yusrah ; Roberts, Matthew ; Nkrumah-Elie, Yasmeen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2214-37f7803cd9aeb6e79ae7c15a1891876271dcb15d4263e9ad92d0af1789015cb33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aging and Chronic Disease</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Idoine, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erickson, Aron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shao, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishtiaq, Yusrah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nkrumah-Elie, Yasmeen</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Current developments in nutrition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Idoine, Rebecca</au><au>Erickson, Aron</au><au>Shao, Andrew</au><au>Ishtiaq, Yusrah</au><au>Roberts, Matthew</au><au>Nkrumah-Elie, Yasmeen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of Clinical Research Outcomes for Personalizing Nicotinamide Riboside Dosing</atitle><jtitle>Current developments in nutrition</jtitle><date>2020-06</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>Supplement_2</issue><spage>34</spage><epage>34</epage><pages>34-34</pages><artnum>nzaa040_034</artnum><issn>2475-2991</issn><eissn>2475-2991</eissn><abstract>Introduction: Nicotinamide riboside (NR), is a NAD + precursor that is commercially available as a nutritional supplement. NAD + levels have been shown to decline in older adults, thus NR has been identified as a healthy aging nutritional supplement. Clinical and preclinical studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of NR supplementation at various doses, however individual responsiveness have been minimally reported. As individuals differ in multiple parameters that may result in variations in response to supplementation, dosing personalization may be a key to NR supplement effectiveness. Objective: Determine if published data of clinical NR supplementation can be used to personalize NR dosing. A meta-analysis of published clinical trials of NR supplementation was conducted. Included studies were limited to those that were exclusive to NR supplementation with multiple doses for at least one week. The assessment compared NR dosing, study population demographics, changes in NAD levels, adverse effects, and study outcomes. A total of 11 publications report clinical results from NR supplementation demonstrated in 9 clinical trials (4 RCT), however only five of the studies met our criteria. Most of the studies have been conducted in both males and females with an average age of 45–65 years, with various BMIs. Dosing ranged from 100 mg/day to 2000 mg/day, for a duration of 9 days to 3 months, with no major adverse events reported. When measured, NAD + levels were shown to increase by as much as 139% with 1000 mg/day of NR for 56 days. Measurements for changes in NAD + lacked standardization in collection, analysis, and reporting, thus parallel comparisons could not be made. Additionally, studies did not separate NR responses based upon gender, age, BMI, and health status, preventing personalization of the available data. To effectively personalize NR dosing, standardization of NAD + analyses and clinical outcomes is gravely needed. Future use of phenotypic flexibility approaches may be beneficial in demonstrating the clinical benefits of NR supplementation. Lastly, it is recommended that future studies include heterogenous response study outcomes to identify responders/non-responders to various endpoints following NR supplementation. None.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1093/cdn/nzaa040_034</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 2475-2991
ispartof Current developments in nutrition, 2020-06, Vol.4 (Supplement_2), p.34-34, Article nzaa040_034
issn 2475-2991
2475-2991
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7257021
source Oxford Journals Open Access Collection
subjects Aging and Chronic Disease
title Assessment of Clinical Research Outcomes for Personalizing Nicotinamide Riboside Dosing
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T19%3A53%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_TOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20Clinical%20Research%20Outcomes%20for%20Personalizing%20Nicotinamide%20Riboside%20Dosing&rft.jtitle=Current%20developments%20in%20nutrition&rft.au=Idoine,%20Rebecca&rft.date=2020-06&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=Supplement_2&rft.spage=34&rft.epage=34&rft.pages=34-34&rft.artnum=nzaa040_034&rft.issn=2475-2991&rft.eissn=2475-2991&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/cdn/nzaa040_034&rft_dat=%3Coup_TOX%3E10.1093/cdn/nzaa040_034%3C/oup_TOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/cdn/nzaa040_034&rft_els_id=S2475299123075522&rfr_iscdi=true