Infarct in new territory after endovascular stroke treatment: A diffusion-weighted imaging study
Data on infarcts in new territory (INT) in patients undergoing endovascular stroke treatment for acute large-vessel occlusions are sparse. Aim of this study was to assess the prevalence, risk factors, and clinical relevance of INT. For this purpose, all patients in a single-center prospective regist...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Scientific reports 2020-05, Vol.10 (1), p.8366-8366, Article 8366 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 8366 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 8366 |
container_title | Scientific reports |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Kaesmacher, Johannes Kurmann, Christoph Jungi, Noel Breiding, Philipe Lang, Matthias F. Meier, Raphael Dobrocky, Tomas Piechowiak, Eike Zibold, Felix Bellwald, Sebastian Meinel, Thomas R. Heldner, Mirjam R. Mordasini, Pasquale Arnold, Marcel Mosimann, Pascal J. Goyal, Mayank Gralla, Jan Fischer, Urs |
description | Data on infarcts in new territory (INT) in patients undergoing endovascular stroke treatment for acute large-vessel occlusions are sparse. Aim of this study was to assess the prevalence, risk factors, and clinical relevance of INT. For this purpose, all patients in a single-center prospective registry who underwent endovascular stroke treatment and received pre- and post-interventional diffusion-weighted imaging were included (N = 259). Using an established scoring system, INT were classified according to size (I-III, ≤2 mm, >2 mm ≤20 mm, >20 mm) and likelihood of being related to the intervention (A, high likelihood; B, low likelihood). Additionally, a new type of infarct, that occurred in a territory distal to the occlusion, but was initially not hypoperfused, was defined as an infarct in initially not hypoperfused territory (IINHT). A total of 180 INT and 38 IINHT were observed in 32.8% (N = 85/259) of patients. In most patients, INT were angiographically occult (90.2%), and 13 patients had INT/IINHT larger than 2 cm (type III). Absence of protection during stent-retrieval and a cardio-embolic stroke origin were associated with higher incidence of INT/IINHT, whereas pretreatment with IV tPA showed no association, even when different bolus timing was considered. INT/IINHT were associated with lower rates of functional independence with increasing size type after adjusting for confounders
(
adjusted Odds Ratio per size group increase 0.63, 95% confidence interval 0.46–0.86). In conclusion, INT and IINHT are not rare, are associated with poor outcome with increasing size, and they may serve as a surrogate endpoint for safety evaluation of new devices and endovascular techniques. Further research on associated factors is warranted. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/s41598-020-64495-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7239894</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2405326580</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-a81fa51712ac7247d77158348923fa115888e4090b0c1217a6f5d22a8201a3e43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFPHSEUhYlpo8b6B7poSNy4GQsX5sG4MDFGrYmJm3ZNrzMwYueBBUbz_r3os9a6KBtOcj8O5-YQ8pmzA86E_polbzvdMGDNQsqubWCDbAOTVQiAD2_0FtnN-ZbV00InebdJtgRIIaTS2-TnRXCY-kJ9oME-0GJT8iWmFUVXNbVhiPeY-3nCRHNJ8ZelJVksSxvKIT2mg3duzj6G5sH68abYgfoljj6MFZ-H1Sfy0eGU7e7LvUN-nJ1-P_nWXF6dX5wcXza9VLI0qLnDlisO2CuQalCKt1pI3YFwyKvW2krWsWvWc-AKF64dAFAD4yisFDvkaO17N18v7dDXeAknc5dqmrQyEb35dxL8jRnjvVEgOt09Gey_GKT4e7a5mKXPvZ0mDDbO2YBkrYBFq1lF996ht3FOoa73TNV4gi0qBWuqTzHnZN1rGM7MU4dm3aGpHZrnDg3UR1_ervH65E9jFRBrINdRGG36-_d_bB8BI0yneQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2405217306</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Infarct in new territory after endovascular stroke treatment: A diffusion-weighted imaging study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Nature Free</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><creator>Kaesmacher, Johannes ; Kurmann, Christoph ; Jungi, Noel ; Breiding, Philipe ; Lang, Matthias F. ; Meier, Raphael ; Dobrocky, Tomas ; Piechowiak, Eike ; Zibold, Felix ; Bellwald, Sebastian ; Meinel, Thomas R. ; Heldner, Mirjam R. ; Mordasini, Pasquale ; Arnold, Marcel ; Mosimann, Pascal J. ; Goyal, Mayank ; Gralla, Jan ; Fischer, Urs</creator><creatorcontrib>Kaesmacher, Johannes ; Kurmann, Christoph ; Jungi, Noel ; Breiding, Philipe ; Lang, Matthias F. ; Meier, Raphael ; Dobrocky, Tomas ; Piechowiak, Eike ; Zibold, Felix ; Bellwald, Sebastian ; Meinel, Thomas R. ; Heldner, Mirjam R. ; Mordasini, Pasquale ; Arnold, Marcel ; Mosimann, Pascal J. ; Goyal, Mayank ; Gralla, Jan ; Fischer, Urs</creatorcontrib><description>Data on infarcts in new territory (INT) in patients undergoing endovascular stroke treatment for acute large-vessel occlusions are sparse. Aim of this study was to assess the prevalence, risk factors, and clinical relevance of INT. For this purpose, all patients in a single-center prospective registry who underwent endovascular stroke treatment and received pre- and post-interventional diffusion-weighted imaging were included (N = 259). Using an established scoring system, INT were classified according to size (I-III, ≤2 mm, >2 mm ≤20 mm, >20 mm) and likelihood of being related to the intervention (A, high likelihood; B, low likelihood). Additionally, a new type of infarct, that occurred in a territory distal to the occlusion, but was initially not hypoperfused, was defined as an infarct in initially not hypoperfused territory (IINHT). A total of 180 INT and 38 IINHT were observed in 32.8% (N = 85/259) of patients. In most patients, INT were angiographically occult (90.2%), and 13 patients had INT/IINHT larger than 2 cm (type III). Absence of protection during stent-retrieval and a cardio-embolic stroke origin were associated with higher incidence of INT/IINHT, whereas pretreatment with IV tPA showed no association, even when different bolus timing was considered. INT/IINHT were associated with lower rates of functional independence with increasing size type after adjusting for confounders
(
adjusted Odds Ratio per size group increase 0.63, 95% confidence interval 0.46–0.86). In conclusion, INT and IINHT are not rare, are associated with poor outcome with increasing size, and they may serve as a surrogate endpoint for safety evaluation of new devices and endovascular techniques. Further research on associated factors is warranted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-64495-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32433478</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>59/57 ; 692/308/409 ; 692/499 ; 692/617/375/534 ; 692/700/139/422 ; Aged ; Brain - blood supply ; Brain - diagnostic imaging ; Brain Infarction - diagnosis ; Brain Infarction - epidemiology ; Brain Infarction - etiology ; Cardiovascular system ; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects ; Endovascular Procedures - instrumentation ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Humans ; Implants ; Male ; Middle Aged ; multidisciplinary ; Occlusion ; Patients ; Postoperative Complications - diagnosis ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Postoperative Period ; Preoperative Care ; Prospective Studies ; Registries - statistics & numerical data ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Science ; Science (multidisciplinary) ; Severity of Illness Index ; Stents - adverse effects ; Stroke ; Stroke - diagnosis ; Stroke - surgery ; Territory ; Thrombectomy - adverse effects ; Thrombectomy - instrumentation ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Scientific reports, 2020-05, Vol.10 (1), p.8366-8366, Article 8366</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-a81fa51712ac7247d77158348923fa115888e4090b0c1217a6f5d22a8201a3e43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-a81fa51712ac7247d77158348923fa115888e4090b0c1217a6f5d22a8201a3e43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0647-9273</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7239894/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7239894/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,41120,42189,51576,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32433478$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kaesmacher, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurmann, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jungi, Noel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breiding, Philipe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lang, Matthias F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meier, Raphael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dobrocky, Tomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piechowiak, Eike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zibold, Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bellwald, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meinel, Thomas R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heldner, Mirjam R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mordasini, Pasquale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnold, Marcel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mosimann, Pascal J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goyal, Mayank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gralla, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Urs</creatorcontrib><title>Infarct in new territory after endovascular stroke treatment: A diffusion-weighted imaging study</title><title>Scientific reports</title><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><description>Data on infarcts in new territory (INT) in patients undergoing endovascular stroke treatment for acute large-vessel occlusions are sparse. Aim of this study was to assess the prevalence, risk factors, and clinical relevance of INT. For this purpose, all patients in a single-center prospective registry who underwent endovascular stroke treatment and received pre- and post-interventional diffusion-weighted imaging were included (N = 259). Using an established scoring system, INT were classified according to size (I-III, ≤2 mm, >2 mm ≤20 mm, >20 mm) and likelihood of being related to the intervention (A, high likelihood; B, low likelihood). Additionally, a new type of infarct, that occurred in a territory distal to the occlusion, but was initially not hypoperfused, was defined as an infarct in initially not hypoperfused territory (IINHT). A total of 180 INT and 38 IINHT were observed in 32.8% (N = 85/259) of patients. In most patients, INT were angiographically occult (90.2%), and 13 patients had INT/IINHT larger than 2 cm (type III). Absence of protection during stent-retrieval and a cardio-embolic stroke origin were associated with higher incidence of INT/IINHT, whereas pretreatment with IV tPA showed no association, even when different bolus timing was considered. INT/IINHT were associated with lower rates of functional independence with increasing size type after adjusting for confounders
(
adjusted Odds Ratio per size group increase 0.63, 95% confidence interval 0.46–0.86). In conclusion, INT and IINHT are not rare, are associated with poor outcome with increasing size, and they may serve as a surrogate endpoint for safety evaluation of new devices and endovascular techniques. Further research on associated factors is warranted.</description><subject>59/57</subject><subject>692/308/409</subject><subject>692/499</subject><subject>692/617/375/534</subject><subject>692/700/139/422</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Brain - blood supply</subject><subject>Brain - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Brain Infarction - diagnosis</subject><subject>Brain Infarction - epidemiology</subject><subject>Brain Infarction - etiology</subject><subject>Cardiovascular system</subject><subject>Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Endovascular Procedures - instrumentation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Implants</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Occlusion</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - diagnosis</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Period</subject><subject>Preoperative Care</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Registries - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Stents - adverse effects</subject><subject>Stroke</subject><subject>Stroke - diagnosis</subject><subject>Stroke - surgery</subject><subject>Territory</subject><subject>Thrombectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Thrombectomy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>2045-2322</issn><issn>2045-2322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUFPHSEUhYlpo8b6B7poSNy4GQsX5sG4MDFGrYmJm3ZNrzMwYueBBUbz_r3os9a6KBtOcj8O5-YQ8pmzA86E_polbzvdMGDNQsqubWCDbAOTVQiAD2_0FtnN-ZbV00InebdJtgRIIaTS2-TnRXCY-kJ9oME-0GJT8iWmFUVXNbVhiPeY-3nCRHNJ8ZelJVksSxvKIT2mg3duzj6G5sH68abYgfoljj6MFZ-H1Sfy0eGU7e7LvUN-nJ1-P_nWXF6dX5wcXza9VLI0qLnDlisO2CuQalCKt1pI3YFwyKvW2krWsWvWc-AKF64dAFAD4yisFDvkaO17N18v7dDXeAknc5dqmrQyEb35dxL8jRnjvVEgOt09Gey_GKT4e7a5mKXPvZ0mDDbO2YBkrYBFq1lF996ht3FOoa73TNV4gi0qBWuqTzHnZN1rGM7MU4dm3aGpHZrnDg3UR1_ervH65E9jFRBrINdRGG36-_d_bB8BI0yneQ</recordid><startdate>20200520</startdate><enddate>20200520</enddate><creator>Kaesmacher, Johannes</creator><creator>Kurmann, Christoph</creator><creator>Jungi, Noel</creator><creator>Breiding, Philipe</creator><creator>Lang, Matthias F.</creator><creator>Meier, Raphael</creator><creator>Dobrocky, Tomas</creator><creator>Piechowiak, Eike</creator><creator>Zibold, Felix</creator><creator>Bellwald, Sebastian</creator><creator>Meinel, Thomas R.</creator><creator>Heldner, Mirjam R.</creator><creator>Mordasini, Pasquale</creator><creator>Arnold, Marcel</creator><creator>Mosimann, Pascal J.</creator><creator>Goyal, Mayank</creator><creator>Gralla, Jan</creator><creator>Fischer, Urs</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0647-9273</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200520</creationdate><title>Infarct in new territory after endovascular stroke treatment: A diffusion-weighted imaging study</title><author>Kaesmacher, Johannes ; Kurmann, Christoph ; Jungi, Noel ; Breiding, Philipe ; Lang, Matthias F. ; Meier, Raphael ; Dobrocky, Tomas ; Piechowiak, Eike ; Zibold, Felix ; Bellwald, Sebastian ; Meinel, Thomas R. ; Heldner, Mirjam R. ; Mordasini, Pasquale ; Arnold, Marcel ; Mosimann, Pascal J. ; Goyal, Mayank ; Gralla, Jan ; Fischer, Urs</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-a81fa51712ac7247d77158348923fa115888e4090b0c1217a6f5d22a8201a3e43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>59/57</topic><topic>692/308/409</topic><topic>692/499</topic><topic>692/617/375/534</topic><topic>692/700/139/422</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Brain - blood supply</topic><topic>Brain - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Brain Infarction - diagnosis</topic><topic>Brain Infarction - epidemiology</topic><topic>Brain Infarction - etiology</topic><topic>Cardiovascular system</topic><topic>Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Endovascular Procedures - instrumentation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Implants</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Occlusion</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - diagnosis</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Period</topic><topic>Preoperative Care</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Registries - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science (multidisciplinary)</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Stents - adverse effects</topic><topic>Stroke</topic><topic>Stroke - diagnosis</topic><topic>Stroke - surgery</topic><topic>Territory</topic><topic>Thrombectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Thrombectomy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kaesmacher, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurmann, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jungi, Noel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breiding, Philipe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lang, Matthias F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meier, Raphael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dobrocky, Tomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piechowiak, Eike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zibold, Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bellwald, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meinel, Thomas R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heldner, Mirjam R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mordasini, Pasquale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnold, Marcel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mosimann, Pascal J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goyal, Mayank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gralla, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Urs</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kaesmacher, Johannes</au><au>Kurmann, Christoph</au><au>Jungi, Noel</au><au>Breiding, Philipe</au><au>Lang, Matthias F.</au><au>Meier, Raphael</au><au>Dobrocky, Tomas</au><au>Piechowiak, Eike</au><au>Zibold, Felix</au><au>Bellwald, Sebastian</au><au>Meinel, Thomas R.</au><au>Heldner, Mirjam R.</au><au>Mordasini, Pasquale</au><au>Arnold, Marcel</au><au>Mosimann, Pascal J.</au><au>Goyal, Mayank</au><au>Gralla, Jan</au><au>Fischer, Urs</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Infarct in new territory after endovascular stroke treatment: A diffusion-weighted imaging study</atitle><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle><stitle>Sci Rep</stitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><date>2020-05-20</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>8366</spage><epage>8366</epage><pages>8366-8366</pages><artnum>8366</artnum><issn>2045-2322</issn><eissn>2045-2322</eissn><abstract>Data on infarcts in new territory (INT) in patients undergoing endovascular stroke treatment for acute large-vessel occlusions are sparse. Aim of this study was to assess the prevalence, risk factors, and clinical relevance of INT. For this purpose, all patients in a single-center prospective registry who underwent endovascular stroke treatment and received pre- and post-interventional diffusion-weighted imaging were included (N = 259). Using an established scoring system, INT were classified according to size (I-III, ≤2 mm, >2 mm ≤20 mm, >20 mm) and likelihood of being related to the intervention (A, high likelihood; B, low likelihood). Additionally, a new type of infarct, that occurred in a territory distal to the occlusion, but was initially not hypoperfused, was defined as an infarct in initially not hypoperfused territory (IINHT). A total of 180 INT and 38 IINHT were observed in 32.8% (N = 85/259) of patients. In most patients, INT were angiographically occult (90.2%), and 13 patients had INT/IINHT larger than 2 cm (type III). Absence of protection during stent-retrieval and a cardio-embolic stroke origin were associated with higher incidence of INT/IINHT, whereas pretreatment with IV tPA showed no association, even when different bolus timing was considered. INT/IINHT were associated with lower rates of functional independence with increasing size type after adjusting for confounders
(
adjusted Odds Ratio per size group increase 0.63, 95% confidence interval 0.46–0.86). In conclusion, INT and IINHT are not rare, are associated with poor outcome with increasing size, and they may serve as a surrogate endpoint for safety evaluation of new devices and endovascular techniques. Further research on associated factors is warranted.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>32433478</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41598-020-64495-2</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0647-9273</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2045-2322 |
ispartof | Scientific reports, 2020-05, Vol.10 (1), p.8366-8366, Article 8366 |
issn | 2045-2322 2045-2322 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7239894 |
source | MEDLINE; Nature Free; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Springer Nature OA Free Journals |
subjects | 59/57 692/308/409 692/499 692/617/375/534 692/700/139/422 Aged Brain - blood supply Brain - diagnostic imaging Brain Infarction - diagnosis Brain Infarction - epidemiology Brain Infarction - etiology Cardiovascular system Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects Endovascular Procedures - instrumentation Female Follow-Up Studies Humanities and Social Sciences Humans Implants Male Middle Aged multidisciplinary Occlusion Patients Postoperative Complications - diagnosis Postoperative Complications - epidemiology Postoperative Complications - etiology Postoperative Period Preoperative Care Prospective Studies Registries - statistics & numerical data Retrospective Studies Risk Factors Science Science (multidisciplinary) Severity of Illness Index Stents - adverse effects Stroke Stroke - diagnosis Stroke - surgery Territory Thrombectomy - adverse effects Thrombectomy - instrumentation Treatment Outcome |
title | Infarct in new territory after endovascular stroke treatment: A diffusion-weighted imaging study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T02%3A33%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Infarct%20in%20new%20territory%20after%20endovascular%20stroke%20treatment:%20A%20diffusion-weighted%20imaging%20study&rft.jtitle=Scientific%20reports&rft.au=Kaesmacher,%20Johannes&rft.date=2020-05-20&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=8366&rft.epage=8366&rft.pages=8366-8366&rft.artnum=8366&rft.issn=2045-2322&rft.eissn=2045-2322&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41598-020-64495-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2405326580%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2405217306&rft_id=info:pmid/32433478&rfr_iscdi=true |