Is routine pre-entry chest radiograph necessary in a high tuberculosis prevalence country?

Context: Chest radiographs have been used worldwide as a screening tool before employment and training, by various healthcare and other government and nongovernment institutions. Many studies done in the past have demonstrated a relatively low yield for tuberculosis detection and therefore, the auth...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of postgraduate medicine 2020-04, Vol.66 (2), p.90-93
Hauptverfasser: Jasper, A, Gibikote, S, Kirupakaran, H, Christopher, D, Mathews, P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 93
container_issue 2
container_start_page 90
container_title Journal of postgraduate medicine
container_volume 66
creator Jasper, A
Gibikote, S
Kirupakaran, H
Christopher, D
Mathews, P
description Context: Chest radiographs have been used worldwide as a screening tool before employment and training, by various healthcare and other government and nongovernment institutions. Many studies done in the past have demonstrated a relatively low yield for tuberculosis detection and therefore, the authors have questioned this practice. Aims: To compare the value of the preadmission/employment chest radiograph in two groups, namely, those who have been previously exposed to a healthcare setting (post-exposure group) and those who have not been exposed (pre-exposure group) and to determine if there is a significant difference in tuberculosis detection between these two groups. Settings and Design: A retrospective review of the reports of the chest radiographs of all candidates appearing for admission to various undergraduate and postgraduate courses in our institute between 2014 and 2017 was performed. Materials and Methods: The various abnormalities detected were recorded and the findings in the two groups were compared. Statistical Analysis Used: Chi-square test was used to compare between two group proportions. Results: Thirty out of 4333 (0.69%) candidates in the pre-exposure group and 53 out of 3379 (1.57%) candidates in the post-exposure group showed abnormalities on chest radiographs involving the lung parenchyma, mediastinum, heart, or pleura. In the pre-exposure group, six (0.14%) were found to have underlying cardiac disease and one (0.02%) had tuberculosis. Among the six candidates in the post-exposure group who underwent further investigations in our institute, five (0.15%) were diagnosed to have tuberculosis. Although there was no statistically significant difference in tuberculosis detection between the groups (P = 0.051), there is a trend towards higher detection of tuberculosis in the post-exposure group. Conclusions: In a country where the prevalence of tuberculosis is high, the pre-employment chest radiograph may still have a role in detecting tuberculosis in the post-exposure group.
doi_str_mv 10.4103/jpgm.JPGM_462_19
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7239409</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2386023589</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509a-6a7f576f0836b8bc1481ac4a76a78668e7c04b4ddc1acdaf630ce5cfc7cead6a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUFP3DAQhS3UCijlzglZ6jng2IntXFpVqKVbUcGhvVRII8eZbLJk42AnrPrv67DLih56suX35s2MP0LOUnaRpUxcrobl-uL73fUPyCSHtDggx6xQPOGaizfxzjhPhM6LI_IuhBVjqZSZOCRHgnPFlCqOye9FoN5NY9sjHTwm2I_-D7UNhpF6U7Vu6c3Q0B4thmCi1PbU0KZdNnScSvR26lxow1z7ZDrsLVLrpjnk03vytjZdwNPdeUJ-ff3y8-pbcnN7vbj6fJPYnBUmkUbVuZI100KWurRpplNjM6OioKXUqCzLyqyqbHyuTC0Fs5jb2iqLppJGnJCP29xhKtdY2XkF08Hg23UcGJxp4V-lbxtYuidQXBQZK2LAh12Ad49T3BxWbvJ9nBm40JJxkevZxbYu610IHut9h5TBTANmGvCKRiw5fz3ZvuDl-6PhfmvYuG5EHx66aYMeovehd5v_BkPBYBFgxw323OCZG7xwE38BYtWs_A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2386023589</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is routine pre-entry chest radiograph necessary in a high tuberculosis prevalence country?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Jasper, A ; Gibikote, S ; Kirupakaran, H ; Christopher, D ; Mathews, P</creator><creatorcontrib>Jasper, A ; Gibikote, S ; Kirupakaran, H ; Christopher, D ; Mathews, P</creatorcontrib><description>Context: Chest radiographs have been used worldwide as a screening tool before employment and training, by various healthcare and other government and nongovernment institutions. Many studies done in the past have demonstrated a relatively low yield for tuberculosis detection and therefore, the authors have questioned this practice. Aims: To compare the value of the preadmission/employment chest radiograph in two groups, namely, those who have been previously exposed to a healthcare setting (post-exposure group) and those who have not been exposed (pre-exposure group) and to determine if there is a significant difference in tuberculosis detection between these two groups. Settings and Design: A retrospective review of the reports of the chest radiographs of all candidates appearing for admission to various undergraduate and postgraduate courses in our institute between 2014 and 2017 was performed. Materials and Methods: The various abnormalities detected were recorded and the findings in the two groups were compared. Statistical Analysis Used: Chi-square test was used to compare between two group proportions. Results: Thirty out of 4333 (0.69%) candidates in the pre-exposure group and 53 out of 3379 (1.57%) candidates in the post-exposure group showed abnormalities on chest radiographs involving the lung parenchyma, mediastinum, heart, or pleura. In the pre-exposure group, six (0.14%) were found to have underlying cardiac disease and one (0.02%) had tuberculosis. Among the six candidates in the post-exposure group who underwent further investigations in our institute, five (0.15%) were diagnosed to have tuberculosis. Although there was no statistically significant difference in tuberculosis detection between the groups (P = 0.051), there is a trend towards higher detection of tuberculosis in the post-exposure group. Conclusions: In a country where the prevalence of tuberculosis is high, the pre-employment chest radiograph may still have a role in detecting tuberculosis in the post-exposure group.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3859</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0972-2823</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/jpgm.JPGM_462_19</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32270779</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age ; Candidates ; Employment ; Female ; Heart surgery ; Humans ; Lung - diagnostic imaging ; Male ; Mass Chest X-Ray ; Mass Screening - methods ; Medical personnel ; Middle Aged ; Occupational Health ; Original ; Prevalence ; Radiography, Thoracic - methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Statistical analysis ; Studies ; Teaching hospitals ; Tuberculosis ; Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - diagnostic imaging ; Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - epidemiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of postgraduate medicine, 2020-04, Vol.66 (2), p.90-93</ispartof><rights>2020. This article is published under (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/) (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Postgraduate Medicine 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509a-6a7f576f0836b8bc1481ac4a76a78668e7c04b4ddc1acdaf630ce5cfc7cead6a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509a-6a7f576f0836b8bc1481ac4a76a78668e7c04b4ddc1acdaf630ce5cfc7cead6a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7239409/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7239409/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32270779$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jasper, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibikote, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirupakaran, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christopher, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathews, P</creatorcontrib><title>Is routine pre-entry chest radiograph necessary in a high tuberculosis prevalence country?</title><title>Journal of postgraduate medicine</title><addtitle>J Postgrad Med</addtitle><description>Context: Chest radiographs have been used worldwide as a screening tool before employment and training, by various healthcare and other government and nongovernment institutions. Many studies done in the past have demonstrated a relatively low yield for tuberculosis detection and therefore, the authors have questioned this practice. Aims: To compare the value of the preadmission/employment chest radiograph in two groups, namely, those who have been previously exposed to a healthcare setting (post-exposure group) and those who have not been exposed (pre-exposure group) and to determine if there is a significant difference in tuberculosis detection between these two groups. Settings and Design: A retrospective review of the reports of the chest radiographs of all candidates appearing for admission to various undergraduate and postgraduate courses in our institute between 2014 and 2017 was performed. Materials and Methods: The various abnormalities detected were recorded and the findings in the two groups were compared. Statistical Analysis Used: Chi-square test was used to compare between two group proportions. Results: Thirty out of 4333 (0.69%) candidates in the pre-exposure group and 53 out of 3379 (1.57%) candidates in the post-exposure group showed abnormalities on chest radiographs involving the lung parenchyma, mediastinum, heart, or pleura. In the pre-exposure group, six (0.14%) were found to have underlying cardiac disease and one (0.02%) had tuberculosis. Among the six candidates in the post-exposure group who underwent further investigations in our institute, five (0.15%) were diagnosed to have tuberculosis. Although there was no statistically significant difference in tuberculosis detection between the groups (P = 0.051), there is a trend towards higher detection of tuberculosis in the post-exposure group. Conclusions: In a country where the prevalence of tuberculosis is high, the pre-employment chest radiograph may still have a role in detecting tuberculosis in the post-exposure group.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Candidates</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lung - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mass Chest X-Ray</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Occupational Health</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Radiography, Thoracic - methods</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Teaching hospitals</subject><subject>Tuberculosis</subject><subject>Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - epidemiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0022-3859</issn><issn>0972-2823</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUFP3DAQhS3UCijlzglZ6jng2IntXFpVqKVbUcGhvVRII8eZbLJk42AnrPrv67DLih56suX35s2MP0LOUnaRpUxcrobl-uL73fUPyCSHtDggx6xQPOGaizfxzjhPhM6LI_IuhBVjqZSZOCRHgnPFlCqOye9FoN5NY9sjHTwm2I_-D7UNhpF6U7Vu6c3Q0B4thmCi1PbU0KZdNnScSvR26lxow1z7ZDrsLVLrpjnk03vytjZdwNPdeUJ-ff3y8-pbcnN7vbj6fJPYnBUmkUbVuZI100KWurRpplNjM6OioKXUqCzLyqyqbHyuTC0Fs5jb2iqLppJGnJCP29xhKtdY2XkF08Hg23UcGJxp4V-lbxtYuidQXBQZK2LAh12Ad49T3BxWbvJ9nBm40JJxkevZxbYu610IHut9h5TBTANmGvCKRiw5fz3ZvuDl-6PhfmvYuG5EHx66aYMeovehd5v_BkPBYBFgxw323OCZG7xwE38BYtWs_A</recordid><startdate>20200401</startdate><enddate>20200401</enddate><creator>Jasper, A</creator><creator>Gibikote, S</creator><creator>Kirupakaran, H</creator><creator>Christopher, D</creator><creator>Mathews, P</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Wolters Kluwer - Medknow</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200401</creationdate><title>Is routine pre-entry chest radiograph necessary in a high tuberculosis prevalence country?</title><author>Jasper, A ; Gibikote, S ; Kirupakaran, H ; Christopher, D ; Mathews, P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c509a-6a7f576f0836b8bc1481ac4a76a78668e7c04b4ddc1acdaf630ce5cfc7cead6a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Candidates</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lung - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mass Chest X-Ray</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Occupational Health</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Radiography, Thoracic - methods</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Teaching hospitals</topic><topic>Tuberculosis</topic><topic>Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - epidemiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jasper, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibikote, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirupakaran, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christopher, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathews, P</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of postgraduate medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jasper, A</au><au>Gibikote, S</au><au>Kirupakaran, H</au><au>Christopher, D</au><au>Mathews, P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is routine pre-entry chest radiograph necessary in a high tuberculosis prevalence country?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of postgraduate medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Postgrad Med</addtitle><date>2020-04-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>90</spage><epage>93</epage><pages>90-93</pages><issn>0022-3859</issn><eissn>0972-2823</eissn><abstract>Context: Chest radiographs have been used worldwide as a screening tool before employment and training, by various healthcare and other government and nongovernment institutions. Many studies done in the past have demonstrated a relatively low yield for tuberculosis detection and therefore, the authors have questioned this practice. Aims: To compare the value of the preadmission/employment chest radiograph in two groups, namely, those who have been previously exposed to a healthcare setting (post-exposure group) and those who have not been exposed (pre-exposure group) and to determine if there is a significant difference in tuberculosis detection between these two groups. Settings and Design: A retrospective review of the reports of the chest radiographs of all candidates appearing for admission to various undergraduate and postgraduate courses in our institute between 2014 and 2017 was performed. Materials and Methods: The various abnormalities detected were recorded and the findings in the two groups were compared. Statistical Analysis Used: Chi-square test was used to compare between two group proportions. Results: Thirty out of 4333 (0.69%) candidates in the pre-exposure group and 53 out of 3379 (1.57%) candidates in the post-exposure group showed abnormalities on chest radiographs involving the lung parenchyma, mediastinum, heart, or pleura. In the pre-exposure group, six (0.14%) were found to have underlying cardiac disease and one (0.02%) had tuberculosis. Among the six candidates in the post-exposure group who underwent further investigations in our institute, five (0.15%) were diagnosed to have tuberculosis. Although there was no statistically significant difference in tuberculosis detection between the groups (P = 0.051), there is a trend towards higher detection of tuberculosis in the post-exposure group. Conclusions: In a country where the prevalence of tuberculosis is high, the pre-employment chest radiograph may still have a role in detecting tuberculosis in the post-exposure group.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>32270779</pmid><doi>10.4103/jpgm.JPGM_462_19</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3859
ispartof Journal of postgraduate medicine, 2020-04, Vol.66 (2), p.90-93
issn 0022-3859
0972-2823
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7239409
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Adult
Age
Candidates
Employment
Female
Heart surgery
Humans
Lung - diagnostic imaging
Male
Mass Chest X-Ray
Mass Screening - methods
Medical personnel
Middle Aged
Occupational Health
Original
Prevalence
Radiography, Thoracic - methods
Retrospective Studies
Statistical analysis
Studies
Teaching hospitals
Tuberculosis
Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - diagnostic imaging
Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - epidemiology
Young Adult
title Is routine pre-entry chest radiograph necessary in a high tuberculosis prevalence country?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T20%3A33%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20routine%20pre-entry%20chest%20radiograph%20necessary%20in%20a%20high%20tuberculosis%20prevalence%20country?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20postgraduate%20medicine&rft.au=Jasper,%20A&rft.date=2020-04-01&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=90&rft.epage=93&rft.pages=90-93&rft.issn=0022-3859&rft.eissn=0972-2823&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/jpgm.JPGM_462_19&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2386023589%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2386023589&rft_id=info:pmid/32270779&rfr_iscdi=true