LC- and GC-QTOF-MS as Complementary Tools for a Comprehensive Micropollutant Analysis in Aquatic Systems

Efficient strategies are required to implement comprehensive suspect screening methods using high-resolution mass spectrometry within environmental monitoring campaigns. In this study, both liquid and gas chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-QTOF-MS and GC-QTOF-MS) were used to screen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental science & technology 2017-02, Vol.51 (3), p.1553-1561
Hauptverfasser: Moschet, Christoph, Lew, Bonny M, Hasenbein, Simone, Anumol, Tarun, Young, Thomas M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1561
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1553
container_title Environmental science & technology
container_volume 51
creator Moschet, Christoph
Lew, Bonny M
Hasenbein, Simone
Anumol, Tarun
Young, Thomas M
description Efficient strategies are required to implement comprehensive suspect screening methods using high-resolution mass spectrometry within environmental monitoring campaigns. In this study, both liquid and gas chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-QTOF-MS and GC-QTOF-MS) were used to screen for >5000 target and suspect compounds in the Sacramento–San Joaquin River Delta in Northern California. LC-QTOF-MS data were acquired in All-Ions fragmentation mode in both positive and negative electrospray ionization (ESI). LC suspects were identified using two accurate mass LC-QTOF-MS/MS libraries containing pesticides, pharmaceuticals, and other environmental contaminants and a custom exact mass database with predicted transformation products (TPs). The additional fragment information from the All-Ions acquisition improved the confirmation of the compound identity, with a low false positive rate (9%). Overall, 25 targets, 73 suspects, and 5 TPs were detected. GC-QTOF-MS extracts were run in negative chemical ionization (NCI) for 21 targets (mainly pyrethroids) at sub-ng/L levels. For suspect screening, extracts were rerun in electron ionization (EI) mode with a retention time locked method using a GC-QTOF-MS pesticide library (containing exact mass fragments and retention times). Sixteen targets and 42 suspects were detected, of which 12 and 17, respectively, were not identified by LC-ESI-QTOF-MS. The results highlight the importance of analyzing water samples using multiple separation techniques and in multiple ionization modes to obtain a comprehensive chemical contaminant profile. The investigated river delta experiences significant pesticide inputs, leading to environmentally critical concentrations during rain events.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/acs.est.6b05352
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7238889</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1853741291</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a527t-498abf5c8ac09d1ed3927b38f36444d60f02ff30087f273f23d0e052c9136ce33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkd2LEzEUxYMobq0--yYBXxZkujfJZJJ5EcrgrkKXRbaCbyHNJHaWzKSbzCz0vze1df0Awac83N85ufcchF4TWBCg5EKbtLBpXFQb4IzTJ2hGOIWCS06eohkAYUXNqq9n6EVKdwBAGcjn6IxKoFXNYYa2q6bAemjxVVN8Xt9cFte3WCfchH7nbW-HUcc9XofgE3YhYv1jEu3WDql7sPi6MzHsgvfTqIcRLwft96lLuBvw8n7SY2fw7T6Ntk8v0TOnfbKvTu8cfbn8sG4-Fqubq0_NclVoTsVYlLXUG8eN1AbqltiW1VRsmHSsKsuyrcABdY4BSOGoYI6yFixwamrCKmMZm6P3R9_dtOlta_IJUXu1i12fT1FBd-rPydBt1bfwoARlUso6G5yfDGK4n3K4qu-Ssd7rwYYpKSKFkEQIgP9AORMloXm3OXr7F3oXppjjOlCVIKSmsszUxZHKqaYUrXvcm4A6FK5y4eqgPhWeFW9-P_eR_9lwBt4dgYPy15__sPsOjAm1ug</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1867119284</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>LC- and GC-QTOF-MS as Complementary Tools for a Comprehensive Micropollutant Analysis in Aquatic Systems</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ACS Publications</source><creator>Moschet, Christoph ; Lew, Bonny M ; Hasenbein, Simone ; Anumol, Tarun ; Young, Thomas M</creator><creatorcontrib>Moschet, Christoph ; Lew, Bonny M ; Hasenbein, Simone ; Anumol, Tarun ; Young, Thomas M</creatorcontrib><description>Efficient strategies are required to implement comprehensive suspect screening methods using high-resolution mass spectrometry within environmental monitoring campaigns. In this study, both liquid and gas chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-QTOF-MS and GC-QTOF-MS) were used to screen for &gt;5000 target and suspect compounds in the Sacramento–San Joaquin River Delta in Northern California. LC-QTOF-MS data were acquired in All-Ions fragmentation mode in both positive and negative electrospray ionization (ESI). LC suspects were identified using two accurate mass LC-QTOF-MS/MS libraries containing pesticides, pharmaceuticals, and other environmental contaminants and a custom exact mass database with predicted transformation products (TPs). The additional fragment information from the All-Ions acquisition improved the confirmation of the compound identity, with a low false positive rate (9%). Overall, 25 targets, 73 suspects, and 5 TPs were detected. GC-QTOF-MS extracts were run in negative chemical ionization (NCI) for 21 targets (mainly pyrethroids) at sub-ng/L levels. For suspect screening, extracts were rerun in electron ionization (EI) mode with a retention time locked method using a GC-QTOF-MS pesticide library (containing exact mass fragments and retention times). Sixteen targets and 42 suspects were detected, of which 12 and 17, respectively, were not identified by LC-ESI-QTOF-MS. The results highlight the importance of analyzing water samples using multiple separation techniques and in multiple ionization modes to obtain a comprehensive chemical contaminant profile. The investigated river delta experiences significant pesticide inputs, leading to environmentally critical concentrations during rain events.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-936X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5851</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b05352</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28026950</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ESTHAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Chromatography ; Chromatography, Liquid ; Environmental monitoring ; Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry ; Ions ; Mass spectrometry ; Pesticides ; Rivers ; Scientific imaging ; Tandem Mass Spectrometry</subject><ispartof>Environmental science &amp; technology, 2017-02, Vol.51 (3), p.1553-1561</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society</rights><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Feb 7, 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a527t-498abf5c8ac09d1ed3927b38f36444d60f02ff30087f273f23d0e052c9136ce33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a527t-498abf5c8ac09d1ed3927b38f36444d60f02ff30087f273f23d0e052c9136ce33</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7217-4753</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.est.6b05352$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.6b05352$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,2766,27080,27928,27929,56742,56792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28026950$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moschet, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lew, Bonny M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hasenbein, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anumol, Tarun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Thomas M</creatorcontrib><title>LC- and GC-QTOF-MS as Complementary Tools for a Comprehensive Micropollutant Analysis in Aquatic Systems</title><title>Environmental science &amp; technology</title><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><description>Efficient strategies are required to implement comprehensive suspect screening methods using high-resolution mass spectrometry within environmental monitoring campaigns. In this study, both liquid and gas chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-QTOF-MS and GC-QTOF-MS) were used to screen for &gt;5000 target and suspect compounds in the Sacramento–San Joaquin River Delta in Northern California. LC-QTOF-MS data were acquired in All-Ions fragmentation mode in both positive and negative electrospray ionization (ESI). LC suspects were identified using two accurate mass LC-QTOF-MS/MS libraries containing pesticides, pharmaceuticals, and other environmental contaminants and a custom exact mass database with predicted transformation products (TPs). The additional fragment information from the All-Ions acquisition improved the confirmation of the compound identity, with a low false positive rate (9%). Overall, 25 targets, 73 suspects, and 5 TPs were detected. GC-QTOF-MS extracts were run in negative chemical ionization (NCI) for 21 targets (mainly pyrethroids) at sub-ng/L levels. For suspect screening, extracts were rerun in electron ionization (EI) mode with a retention time locked method using a GC-QTOF-MS pesticide library (containing exact mass fragments and retention times). Sixteen targets and 42 suspects were detected, of which 12 and 17, respectively, were not identified by LC-ESI-QTOF-MS. The results highlight the importance of analyzing water samples using multiple separation techniques and in multiple ionization modes to obtain a comprehensive chemical contaminant profile. The investigated river delta experiences significant pesticide inputs, leading to environmentally critical concentrations during rain events.</description><subject>Chromatography</subject><subject>Chromatography, Liquid</subject><subject>Environmental monitoring</subject><subject>Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry</subject><subject>Ions</subject><subject>Mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Scientific imaging</subject><subject>Tandem Mass Spectrometry</subject><issn>0013-936X</issn><issn>1520-5851</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkd2LEzEUxYMobq0--yYBXxZkujfJZJJ5EcrgrkKXRbaCbyHNJHaWzKSbzCz0vze1df0Awac83N85ufcchF4TWBCg5EKbtLBpXFQb4IzTJ2hGOIWCS06eohkAYUXNqq9n6EVKdwBAGcjn6IxKoFXNYYa2q6bAemjxVVN8Xt9cFte3WCfchH7nbW-HUcc9XofgE3YhYv1jEu3WDql7sPi6MzHsgvfTqIcRLwft96lLuBvw8n7SY2fw7T6Ntk8v0TOnfbKvTu8cfbn8sG4-Fqubq0_NclVoTsVYlLXUG8eN1AbqltiW1VRsmHSsKsuyrcABdY4BSOGoYI6yFixwamrCKmMZm6P3R9_dtOlta_IJUXu1i12fT1FBd-rPydBt1bfwoARlUso6G5yfDGK4n3K4qu-Ssd7rwYYpKSKFkEQIgP9AORMloXm3OXr7F3oXppjjOlCVIKSmsszUxZHKqaYUrXvcm4A6FK5y4eqgPhWeFW9-P_eR_9lwBt4dgYPy15__sPsOjAm1ug</recordid><startdate>20170207</startdate><enddate>20170207</enddate><creator>Moschet, Christoph</creator><creator>Lew, Bonny M</creator><creator>Hasenbein, Simone</creator><creator>Anumol, Tarun</creator><creator>Young, Thomas M</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7217-4753</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170207</creationdate><title>LC- and GC-QTOF-MS as Complementary Tools for a Comprehensive Micropollutant Analysis in Aquatic Systems</title><author>Moschet, Christoph ; Lew, Bonny M ; Hasenbein, Simone ; Anumol, Tarun ; Young, Thomas M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a527t-498abf5c8ac09d1ed3927b38f36444d60f02ff30087f273f23d0e052c9136ce33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Chromatography</topic><topic>Chromatography, Liquid</topic><topic>Environmental monitoring</topic><topic>Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry</topic><topic>Ions</topic><topic>Mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Scientific imaging</topic><topic>Tandem Mass Spectrometry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moschet, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lew, Bonny M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hasenbein, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anumol, Tarun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Thomas M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Environmental science &amp; technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moschet, Christoph</au><au>Lew, Bonny M</au><au>Hasenbein, Simone</au><au>Anumol, Tarun</au><au>Young, Thomas M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>LC- and GC-QTOF-MS as Complementary Tools for a Comprehensive Micropollutant Analysis in Aquatic Systems</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science &amp; technology</jtitle><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><date>2017-02-07</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1553</spage><epage>1561</epage><pages>1553-1561</pages><issn>0013-936X</issn><eissn>1520-5851</eissn><coden>ESTHAG</coden><abstract>Efficient strategies are required to implement comprehensive suspect screening methods using high-resolution mass spectrometry within environmental monitoring campaigns. In this study, both liquid and gas chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-QTOF-MS and GC-QTOF-MS) were used to screen for &gt;5000 target and suspect compounds in the Sacramento–San Joaquin River Delta in Northern California. LC-QTOF-MS data were acquired in All-Ions fragmentation mode in both positive and negative electrospray ionization (ESI). LC suspects were identified using two accurate mass LC-QTOF-MS/MS libraries containing pesticides, pharmaceuticals, and other environmental contaminants and a custom exact mass database with predicted transformation products (TPs). The additional fragment information from the All-Ions acquisition improved the confirmation of the compound identity, with a low false positive rate (9%). Overall, 25 targets, 73 suspects, and 5 TPs were detected. GC-QTOF-MS extracts were run in negative chemical ionization (NCI) for 21 targets (mainly pyrethroids) at sub-ng/L levels. For suspect screening, extracts were rerun in electron ionization (EI) mode with a retention time locked method using a GC-QTOF-MS pesticide library (containing exact mass fragments and retention times). Sixteen targets and 42 suspects were detected, of which 12 and 17, respectively, were not identified by LC-ESI-QTOF-MS. The results highlight the importance of analyzing water samples using multiple separation techniques and in multiple ionization modes to obtain a comprehensive chemical contaminant profile. The investigated river delta experiences significant pesticide inputs, leading to environmentally critical concentrations during rain events.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>28026950</pmid><doi>10.1021/acs.est.6b05352</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7217-4753</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-936X
ispartof Environmental science & technology, 2017-02, Vol.51 (3), p.1553-1561
issn 0013-936X
1520-5851
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7238889
source MEDLINE; ACS Publications
subjects Chromatography
Chromatography, Liquid
Environmental monitoring
Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry
Ions
Mass spectrometry
Pesticides
Rivers
Scientific imaging
Tandem Mass Spectrometry
title LC- and GC-QTOF-MS as Complementary Tools for a Comprehensive Micropollutant Analysis in Aquatic Systems
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T02%3A44%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=LC-%20and%20GC-QTOF-MS%20as%20Complementary%20Tools%20for%20a%20Comprehensive%20Micropollutant%20Analysis%20in%20Aquatic%20Systems&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20&%20technology&rft.au=Moschet,%20Christoph&rft.date=2017-02-07&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1553&rft.epage=1561&rft.pages=1553-1561&rft.issn=0013-936X&rft.eissn=1520-5851&rft.coden=ESTHAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.est.6b05352&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1853741291%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1867119284&rft_id=info:pmid/28026950&rfr_iscdi=true