Civil Monetary Penalties Resulting From Violations of the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) Involving Psychiatric Emergencies, 2002 to 2018

Objective The objective was to describe characteristics of civil monetary penalties levied by the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) related to violations of the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) involving psychiatric emergencies. Methods Descriptions of EMTALA‐related civil mone...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Academic emergency medicine 2019-05, Vol.26 (5), p.470-478
Hauptverfasser: Terp, Sophie, Wang, Brandon, Burner, Elizabeth, Connor, Denton, Seabury, Seth A., Menchine, Michael, Kuehl, Damon R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 478
container_issue 5
container_start_page 470
container_title Academic emergency medicine
container_volume 26
creator Terp, Sophie
Wang, Brandon
Burner, Elizabeth
Connor, Denton
Seabury, Seth A.
Menchine, Michael
Kuehl, Damon R.
description Objective The objective was to describe characteristics of civil monetary penalties levied by the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) related to violations of the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) involving psychiatric emergencies. Methods Descriptions of EMTALA‐related civil monetary penalty settlements from 2002 to 2018 were obtained from the OIG. Cases related to psychiatric emergencies were identified by inclusion of key words in settlement descriptions. Characteristics of settlements involving EMTALA violations related to psychiatric emergencies including date, amount, and nature of the allegation were described and compared with settlements not involving psychiatric emergencies. Results Of 230 civil monetary penalty settlements related to EMTALA during the study period, 44 (19%) were related to psychiatric emergencies. The average settlement for psychiatric‐related cases was $85,488, compared with $32,004 for non–psychiatric‐related cases (p 
doi_str_mv 10.1111/acem.13710
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7237063</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2210960560</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4200-988e01a657f3df21305350e9d020a6707cba203b3e8a91e889e57b5b75ba7d013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFuEzEQhlcIREvhwgMgHwtiy9iu17sXpFWUQqVEVChwtbze2cRo1y62E5R34WFxSInggi8zkj99M_ZfFC8pXNF83mmD0xXlksKj4pwKwUsmKXuce6iashIVPyuexfgNAIRs5NPijEPTXDMhzoufM7uzI1l6h0mHPblDp8dkMZLPGLe5c2tyE_xEvlo_6mS9i8QPJG2QzCcMa3RmT5bYW6NHsgqo04QuEe16stCdD6Q1iVzOl6t20b4mt27nx93BeRf3ZmN1CtacRHnqW8IAGEk-V1o_L54Meoz44qFeFF9u5qvZx3Lx6cPtrF2U5jrjZVPXCFRXQg68HxjlILgAbHpgoCsJ0nSaAe841rqhWNcNCtmJTopOyx4ovyjeH733227C3uQXBD2q-2Cn_CfKa6v-vXF2o9Z-pyTjEiqeBZcPguC_bzEmNdlocBy1Q7-NijEKTQWigoy-OaIm-BgDDqcxFNQhTnWIU_2OM8Ov_l7shP7JLwP0CPywI-7_o1LtbL48Sn8BEeqqgQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2210960560</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Civil Monetary Penalties Resulting From Violations of the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) Involving Psychiatric Emergencies, 2002 to 2018</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Terp, Sophie ; Wang, Brandon ; Burner, Elizabeth ; Connor, Denton ; Seabury, Seth A. ; Menchine, Michael ; Kuehl, Damon R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Terp, Sophie ; Wang, Brandon ; Burner, Elizabeth ; Connor, Denton ; Seabury, Seth A. ; Menchine, Michael ; Kuehl, Damon R.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective The objective was to describe characteristics of civil monetary penalties levied by the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) related to violations of the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) involving psychiatric emergencies. Methods Descriptions of EMTALA‐related civil monetary penalty settlements from 2002 to 2018 were obtained from the OIG. Cases related to psychiatric emergencies were identified by inclusion of key words in settlement descriptions. Characteristics of settlements involving EMTALA violations related to psychiatric emergencies including date, amount, and nature of the allegation were described and compared with settlements not involving psychiatric emergencies. Results Of 230 civil monetary penalty settlements related to EMTALA during the study period, 44 (19%) were related to psychiatric emergencies. The average settlement for psychiatric‐related cases was $85,488, compared with $32,004 for non–psychiatric‐related cases (p &lt; 0.001). Five (83%) of the six largest settlements during the study period were related to cases involving psychiatric emergencies. The most commonly cited deficiencies for settlements involving psychiatric patients were failure to provide appropriate medical screening examination (84%) or stabilizing treatment (68%) or arrange appropriate transfer (30%). Failure to provide stabilizing treatment was more common among cases involving psychiatric emergencies (68% vs. 51%, p = 0.041). Among psychiatric‐related settlements, 18 (41%) occurred in CMS Region IV (Southeast) and nine (20%) in Region VII (Central). Conclusions Nearly one in five civil monetary penalty settlements related to EMTALA violations involved psychiatric emergencies. Settlements related to psychiatric emergencies were more costly and more often associated with failure to stabilize than for nonpsychiatric emergencies. Administrators should evaluate and strengthen policies and procedures related to psychiatric screening examinations, stabilizing care of psychiatric patients boarding in EDs, and transfer policies. Recent large, notable settlements related to EMTALA violations suggest that there is considerable room to improve access to and quality of care for patients with psychiatric emergencies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1069-6563</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1553-2712</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/acem.13710</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30994255</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Case-Control Studies ; Emergency Service, Hospital - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Emergency Treatment - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Humans ; Legislation, Hospital ; Liability, Legal - economics ; Malpractice ; Mental Disorders - therapy ; United States</subject><ispartof>Academic emergency medicine, 2019-05, Vol.26 (5), p.470-478</ispartof><rights>2019 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine</rights><rights>2019 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4200-988e01a657f3df21305350e9d020a6707cba203b3e8a91e889e57b5b75ba7d013</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4200-988e01a657f3df21305350e9d020a6707cba203b3e8a91e889e57b5b75ba7d013</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Facem.13710$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Facem.13710$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30994255$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Terp, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Brandon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burner, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Connor, Denton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seabury, Seth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menchine, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuehl, Damon R.</creatorcontrib><title>Civil Monetary Penalties Resulting From Violations of the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) Involving Psychiatric Emergencies, 2002 to 2018</title><title>Academic emergency medicine</title><addtitle>Acad Emerg Med</addtitle><description>Objective The objective was to describe characteristics of civil monetary penalties levied by the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) related to violations of the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) involving psychiatric emergencies. Methods Descriptions of EMTALA‐related civil monetary penalty settlements from 2002 to 2018 were obtained from the OIG. Cases related to psychiatric emergencies were identified by inclusion of key words in settlement descriptions. Characteristics of settlements involving EMTALA violations related to psychiatric emergencies including date, amount, and nature of the allegation were described and compared with settlements not involving psychiatric emergencies. Results Of 230 civil monetary penalty settlements related to EMTALA during the study period, 44 (19%) were related to psychiatric emergencies. The average settlement for psychiatric‐related cases was $85,488, compared with $32,004 for non–psychiatric‐related cases (p &lt; 0.001). Five (83%) of the six largest settlements during the study period were related to cases involving psychiatric emergencies. The most commonly cited deficiencies for settlements involving psychiatric patients were failure to provide appropriate medical screening examination (84%) or stabilizing treatment (68%) or arrange appropriate transfer (30%). Failure to provide stabilizing treatment was more common among cases involving psychiatric emergencies (68% vs. 51%, p = 0.041). Among psychiatric‐related settlements, 18 (41%) occurred in CMS Region IV (Southeast) and nine (20%) in Region VII (Central). Conclusions Nearly one in five civil monetary penalty settlements related to EMTALA violations involved psychiatric emergencies. Settlements related to psychiatric emergencies were more costly and more often associated with failure to stabilize than for nonpsychiatric emergencies. Administrators should evaluate and strengthen policies and procedures related to psychiatric screening examinations, stabilizing care of psychiatric patients boarding in EDs, and transfer policies. Recent large, notable settlements related to EMTALA violations suggest that there is considerable room to improve access to and quality of care for patients with psychiatric emergencies.</description><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Emergency Treatment - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Legislation, Hospital</subject><subject>Liability, Legal - economics</subject><subject>Malpractice</subject><subject>Mental Disorders - therapy</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1069-6563</issn><issn>1553-2712</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFuEzEQhlcIREvhwgMgHwtiy9iu17sXpFWUQqVEVChwtbze2cRo1y62E5R34WFxSInggi8zkj99M_ZfFC8pXNF83mmD0xXlksKj4pwKwUsmKXuce6iashIVPyuexfgNAIRs5NPijEPTXDMhzoufM7uzI1l6h0mHPblDp8dkMZLPGLe5c2tyE_xEvlo_6mS9i8QPJG2QzCcMa3RmT5bYW6NHsgqo04QuEe16stCdD6Q1iVzOl6t20b4mt27nx93BeRf3ZmN1CtacRHnqW8IAGEk-V1o_L54Meoz44qFeFF9u5qvZx3Lx6cPtrF2U5jrjZVPXCFRXQg68HxjlILgAbHpgoCsJ0nSaAe841rqhWNcNCtmJTopOyx4ovyjeH733227C3uQXBD2q-2Cn_CfKa6v-vXF2o9Z-pyTjEiqeBZcPguC_bzEmNdlocBy1Q7-NijEKTQWigoy-OaIm-BgDDqcxFNQhTnWIU_2OM8Ov_l7shP7JLwP0CPywI-7_o1LtbL48Sn8BEeqqgQ</recordid><startdate>201905</startdate><enddate>201905</enddate><creator>Terp, Sophie</creator><creator>Wang, Brandon</creator><creator>Burner, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Connor, Denton</creator><creator>Seabury, Seth A.</creator><creator>Menchine, Michael</creator><creator>Kuehl, Damon R.</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201905</creationdate><title>Civil Monetary Penalties Resulting From Violations of the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) Involving Psychiatric Emergencies, 2002 to 2018</title><author>Terp, Sophie ; Wang, Brandon ; Burner, Elizabeth ; Connor, Denton ; Seabury, Seth A. ; Menchine, Michael ; Kuehl, Damon R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4200-988e01a657f3df21305350e9d020a6707cba203b3e8a91e889e57b5b75ba7d013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Emergency Treatment - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Legislation, Hospital</topic><topic>Liability, Legal - economics</topic><topic>Malpractice</topic><topic>Mental Disorders - therapy</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Terp, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Brandon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burner, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Connor, Denton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seabury, Seth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menchine, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuehl, Damon R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Academic emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Terp, Sophie</au><au>Wang, Brandon</au><au>Burner, Elizabeth</au><au>Connor, Denton</au><au>Seabury, Seth A.</au><au>Menchine, Michael</au><au>Kuehl, Damon R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Civil Monetary Penalties Resulting From Violations of the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) Involving Psychiatric Emergencies, 2002 to 2018</atitle><jtitle>Academic emergency medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Acad Emerg Med</addtitle><date>2019-05</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>470</spage><epage>478</epage><pages>470-478</pages><issn>1069-6563</issn><eissn>1553-2712</eissn><abstract>Objective The objective was to describe characteristics of civil monetary penalties levied by the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) related to violations of the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) involving psychiatric emergencies. Methods Descriptions of EMTALA‐related civil monetary penalty settlements from 2002 to 2018 were obtained from the OIG. Cases related to psychiatric emergencies were identified by inclusion of key words in settlement descriptions. Characteristics of settlements involving EMTALA violations related to psychiatric emergencies including date, amount, and nature of the allegation were described and compared with settlements not involving psychiatric emergencies. Results Of 230 civil monetary penalty settlements related to EMTALA during the study period, 44 (19%) were related to psychiatric emergencies. The average settlement for psychiatric‐related cases was $85,488, compared with $32,004 for non–psychiatric‐related cases (p &lt; 0.001). Five (83%) of the six largest settlements during the study period were related to cases involving psychiatric emergencies. The most commonly cited deficiencies for settlements involving psychiatric patients were failure to provide appropriate medical screening examination (84%) or stabilizing treatment (68%) or arrange appropriate transfer (30%). Failure to provide stabilizing treatment was more common among cases involving psychiatric emergencies (68% vs. 51%, p = 0.041). Among psychiatric‐related settlements, 18 (41%) occurred in CMS Region IV (Southeast) and nine (20%) in Region VII (Central). Conclusions Nearly one in five civil monetary penalty settlements related to EMTALA violations involved psychiatric emergencies. Settlements related to psychiatric emergencies were more costly and more often associated with failure to stabilize than for nonpsychiatric emergencies. Administrators should evaluate and strengthen policies and procedures related to psychiatric screening examinations, stabilizing care of psychiatric patients boarding in EDs, and transfer policies. Recent large, notable settlements related to EMTALA violations suggest that there is considerable room to improve access to and quality of care for patients with psychiatric emergencies.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>30994255</pmid><doi>10.1111/acem.13710</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1069-6563
ispartof Academic emergency medicine, 2019-05, Vol.26 (5), p.470-478
issn 1069-6563
1553-2712
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7237063
source Wiley Free Content; MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Case-Control Studies
Emergency Service, Hospital - legislation & jurisprudence
Emergency Treatment - statistics & numerical data
Humans
Legislation, Hospital
Liability, Legal - economics
Malpractice
Mental Disorders - therapy
United States
title Civil Monetary Penalties Resulting From Violations of the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) Involving Psychiatric Emergencies, 2002 to 2018
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T04%3A49%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Civil%20Monetary%20Penalties%20Resulting%20From%20Violations%20of%20the%20Emergency%20Medical%20Treatment%20and%20Labor%20Act%20(EMTALA)%20Involving%20Psychiatric%20Emergencies,%202002%20to%202018&rft.jtitle=Academic%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=Terp,%20Sophie&rft.date=2019-05&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=470&rft.epage=478&rft.pages=470-478&rft.issn=1069-6563&rft.eissn=1553-2712&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/acem.13710&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2210960560%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2210960560&rft_id=info:pmid/30994255&rfr_iscdi=true