Sender and receiver experience alters the response of fish to disturbance cues
Abstract Predation is a pervasive selection pressure, shaping morphological, physiological, and behavioral phenotypes of prey species. Recent studies have begun to examine how the effects of individual experience with predation risk shapes the use of publicly available risk assessment cues. Here, we...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Current Zoology 2020-06, Vol.66 (3), p.255-261 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 261 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 255 |
container_title | Current Zoology |
container_volume | 66 |
creator | Goldman, Jack A Feyten, Laurence E A Ramnarine, Indar W Brown, Grant E |
description | Abstract
Predation is a pervasive selection pressure, shaping morphological, physiological, and behavioral phenotypes of prey species. Recent studies have begun to examine how the effects of individual experience with predation risk shapes the use of publicly available risk assessment cues. Here, we investigated the effects of prior predation risk experience on disturbance cue production and use by Trinidadian guppies Poecilia reticulata under laboratory conditions. In our first experiment, we demonstrate that the response of guppies from a high predation population (Lopinot River) was dependent upon the source of disturbance cue senders (high vs. low predation populations). However, guppies collected from a low predation site (Upper Aripo River) exhibited similar responses to disturbance cues, regardless of the sender population. In our second experiment, we used laboratory strain guppies exposed to high versus low background risk conditions. Our results show an analogous response patterns as shown for our first experiment. Guppies exposed to high background risk conditions exhibited stronger responses to the disturbance cues collected from senders exposed to high (vs. low) risk conditions and guppies exposed to low risk conditions were not influenced by sender experience. Combined, our results suggest that experience with background predation risk significantly impacts both the production of and response to disturbance cues in guppies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/cz/zoz050 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7234198</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/cz/zoz050</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2431024055</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-55a04effc4ea3645ad8372d8da5805b3be2434fa9ed6166aa912e2f4eec99873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90U1LwzAYB_AgipvTg19ACnrQw1zemjYXQYZvMPTg7iFLn7qOrqlJO7Sf3ozNoR48hYfnx59_eBA6JfiaYMlGpht1tsMx3kN9yqQYypTwfdQnIuHDOMZJDx15v8BYCC7JIeoxyjmmqeij51eoMnCRrrLIgYFiFQb4qMEVUBmIdNmA81Ezh7D2ta08RDaP8sLPo8ZGWeGb1s30mpoW_DE6yHXp4WT7DtD0_m46fhxOXh6exreToWGCNqGTxhzy3HDQTPBYZylLaJZmOk5xPGMzoJzxXEvIBBFCa0ko0JwDGCnThA3QzSa2bmdLyAxUjdOlql2x1O5TWV2o35uqmKs3u1IJZZzINARcbgOcfQ-9G7UsvIGy1BXY1ivKsWBYkEQGev6HLmzrqvC7oBjBgcZxUFcbZZz13kG-K0OwWh9JmU5tjhTs2c_2O_l9lQAuNsC29T85XwAqm1g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2431024055</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sender and receiver experience alters the response of fish to disturbance cues</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Goldman, Jack A ; Feyten, Laurence E A ; Ramnarine, Indar W ; Brown, Grant E</creator><contributor>Zhang, Jianxu</contributor><creatorcontrib>Goldman, Jack A ; Feyten, Laurence E A ; Ramnarine, Indar W ; Brown, Grant E ; Zhang, Jianxu</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Predation is a pervasive selection pressure, shaping morphological, physiological, and behavioral phenotypes of prey species. Recent studies have begun to examine how the effects of individual experience with predation risk shapes the use of publicly available risk assessment cues. Here, we investigated the effects of prior predation risk experience on disturbance cue production and use by Trinidadian guppies Poecilia reticulata under laboratory conditions. In our first experiment, we demonstrate that the response of guppies from a high predation population (Lopinot River) was dependent upon the source of disturbance cue senders (high vs. low predation populations). However, guppies collected from a low predation site (Upper Aripo River) exhibited similar responses to disturbance cues, regardless of the sender population. In our second experiment, we used laboratory strain guppies exposed to high versus low background risk conditions. Our results show an analogous response patterns as shown for our first experiment. Guppies exposed to high background risk conditions exhibited stronger responses to the disturbance cues collected from senders exposed to high (vs. low) risk conditions and guppies exposed to low risk conditions were not influenced by sender experience. Combined, our results suggest that experience with background predation risk significantly impacts both the production of and response to disturbance cues in guppies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1674-5507</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2396-9814</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2396-9814</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/cz/zoz050</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32440286</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Experiments ; Laboratories ; Phenotypes ; Predation ; Prey ; Risk assessment</subject><ispartof>Current Zoology, 2020-06, Vol.66 (3), p.255-261</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) (2019). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Editorial Office, Current Zoology. 2019</rights><rights>The Author(s) (2019). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Editorial Office, Current Zoology.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-55a04effc4ea3645ad8372d8da5805b3be2434fa9ed6166aa912e2f4eec99873</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-55a04effc4ea3645ad8372d8da5805b3be2434fa9ed6166aa912e2f4eec99873</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7234198/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7234198/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,883,27911,27912,53778,53780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32440286$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Zhang, Jianxu</contributor><creatorcontrib>Goldman, Jack A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feyten, Laurence E A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramnarine, Indar W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Grant E</creatorcontrib><title>Sender and receiver experience alters the response of fish to disturbance cues</title><title>Current Zoology</title><addtitle>Curr Zool</addtitle><description>Abstract
Predation is a pervasive selection pressure, shaping morphological, physiological, and behavioral phenotypes of prey species. Recent studies have begun to examine how the effects of individual experience with predation risk shapes the use of publicly available risk assessment cues. Here, we investigated the effects of prior predation risk experience on disturbance cue production and use by Trinidadian guppies Poecilia reticulata under laboratory conditions. In our first experiment, we demonstrate that the response of guppies from a high predation population (Lopinot River) was dependent upon the source of disturbance cue senders (high vs. low predation populations). However, guppies collected from a low predation site (Upper Aripo River) exhibited similar responses to disturbance cues, regardless of the sender population. In our second experiment, we used laboratory strain guppies exposed to high versus low background risk conditions. Our results show an analogous response patterns as shown for our first experiment. Guppies exposed to high background risk conditions exhibited stronger responses to the disturbance cues collected from senders exposed to high (vs. low) risk conditions and guppies exposed to low risk conditions were not influenced by sender experience. Combined, our results suggest that experience with background predation risk significantly impacts both the production of and response to disturbance cues in guppies.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Phenotypes</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Prey</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><issn>1674-5507</issn><issn>2396-9814</issn><issn>2396-9814</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp90U1LwzAYB_AgipvTg19ACnrQw1zemjYXQYZvMPTg7iFLn7qOrqlJO7Sf3ozNoR48hYfnx59_eBA6JfiaYMlGpht1tsMx3kN9yqQYypTwfdQnIuHDOMZJDx15v8BYCC7JIeoxyjmmqeij51eoMnCRrrLIgYFiFQb4qMEVUBmIdNmA81Ezh7D2ta08RDaP8sLPo8ZGWeGb1s30mpoW_DE6yHXp4WT7DtD0_m46fhxOXh6exreToWGCNqGTxhzy3HDQTPBYZylLaJZmOk5xPGMzoJzxXEvIBBFCa0ko0JwDGCnThA3QzSa2bmdLyAxUjdOlql2x1O5TWV2o35uqmKs3u1IJZZzINARcbgOcfQ-9G7UsvIGy1BXY1ivKsWBYkEQGev6HLmzrqvC7oBjBgcZxUFcbZZz13kG-K0OwWh9JmU5tjhTs2c_2O_l9lQAuNsC29T85XwAqm1g</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>Goldman, Jack A</creator><creator>Feyten, Laurence E A</creator><creator>Ramnarine, Indar W</creator><creator>Brown, Grant E</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>Sender and receiver experience alters the response of fish to disturbance cues</title><author>Goldman, Jack A ; Feyten, Laurence E A ; Ramnarine, Indar W ; Brown, Grant E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-55a04effc4ea3645ad8372d8da5805b3be2434fa9ed6166aa912e2f4eec99873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Phenotypes</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Prey</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goldman, Jack A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feyten, Laurence E A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramnarine, Indar W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Grant E</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Current Zoology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goldman, Jack A</au><au>Feyten, Laurence E A</au><au>Ramnarine, Indar W</au><au>Brown, Grant E</au><au>Zhang, Jianxu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sender and receiver experience alters the response of fish to disturbance cues</atitle><jtitle>Current Zoology</jtitle><addtitle>Curr Zool</addtitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>255</spage><epage>261</epage><pages>255-261</pages><issn>1674-5507</issn><issn>2396-9814</issn><eissn>2396-9814</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Predation is a pervasive selection pressure, shaping morphological, physiological, and behavioral phenotypes of prey species. Recent studies have begun to examine how the effects of individual experience with predation risk shapes the use of publicly available risk assessment cues. Here, we investigated the effects of prior predation risk experience on disturbance cue production and use by Trinidadian guppies Poecilia reticulata under laboratory conditions. In our first experiment, we demonstrate that the response of guppies from a high predation population (Lopinot River) was dependent upon the source of disturbance cue senders (high vs. low predation populations). However, guppies collected from a low predation site (Upper Aripo River) exhibited similar responses to disturbance cues, regardless of the sender population. In our second experiment, we used laboratory strain guppies exposed to high versus low background risk conditions. Our results show an analogous response patterns as shown for our first experiment. Guppies exposed to high background risk conditions exhibited stronger responses to the disturbance cues collected from senders exposed to high (vs. low) risk conditions and guppies exposed to low risk conditions were not influenced by sender experience. Combined, our results suggest that experience with background predation risk significantly impacts both the production of and response to disturbance cues in guppies.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>32440286</pmid><doi>10.1093/cz/zoz050</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1674-5507 |
ispartof | Current Zoology, 2020-06, Vol.66 (3), p.255-261 |
issn | 1674-5507 2396-9814 2396-9814 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7234198 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Animal behavior Experiments Laboratories Phenotypes Predation Prey Risk assessment |
title | Sender and receiver experience alters the response of fish to disturbance cues |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T10%3A12%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sender%20and%20receiver%20experience%20alters%20the%20response%20of%20fish%20to%20disturbance%20cues&rft.jtitle=Current%20Zoology&rft.au=Goldman,%20Jack%20A&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=255&rft.epage=261&rft.pages=255-261&rft.issn=1674-5507&rft.eissn=2396-9814&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/cz/zoz050&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2431024055%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2431024055&rft_id=info:pmid/32440286&rft_oup_id=10.1093/cz/zoz050&rfr_iscdi=true |