Correlation of Chest CT and RT-PCR Testing for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A Report of 1014 Cases
Background Chest CT is used in the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and is an important complement to reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests. Purpose To investigate the diagnostic value and consistency of chest CT as compared with RT-PCR assay in COVID-19. Mat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Radiology 2020-08, Vol.296 (2), p.E32-E40 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | E40 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | E32 |
container_title | Radiology |
container_volume | 296 |
creator | Ai, Tao Yang, Zhenlu Hou, Hongyan Zhan, Chenao Chen, Chong Lv, Wenzhi Tao, Qian Sun, Ziyong Xia, Liming |
description | Background Chest CT is used in the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and is an important complement to reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests. Purpose To investigate the diagnostic value and consistency of chest CT as compared with RT-PCR assay in COVID-19. Materials and Methods This study included 1014 patients in Wuhan, China, who underwent both chest CT and RT-PCR tests between January 6 and February 6, 2020. With use of RT-PCR as the reference standard, the performance of chest CT in the diagnosis of COVID-19 was assessed. In addition, for patients with multiple RT-PCR assays, the dynamic conversion of RT-PCR results (negative to positive, positive to negative) was analyzed as compared with serial chest CT scans for those with a time interval between RT-PCR tests of 4 days or more. Results Of the 1014 patients, 601 of 1014 (59%) had positive RT-PCR results and 888 of 1014 (88%) had positive chest CT scans. The sensitivity of chest CT in suggesting COVID-19 was 97% (95% confidence interval: 95%, 98%; 580 of 601 patients) based on positive RT-PCR results. In the 413 patients with negative RT-PCR results, 308 of 413 (75%) had positive chest CT findings. Of those 308 patients, 48% (103 of 308) were considered as highly likely cases and 33% (103 of 308) as probable cases. At analysis of serial RT-PCR assays and CT scans, the mean interval between the initial negative to positive RT-PCR results was 5.1 days ± 1.5; the mean interval between initial positive to subsequent negative RT-PCR results was 6.9 days ± 2.3. Of the 1014 patients, 60% (34 of 57) to 93% (14 of 15) had initial positive CT scans consistent with COVID-19 before (or parallel to) the initial positive RT-PCR results. Twenty-four of 57 patients (42%) showed improvement on follow-up chest CT scans before the RT-PCR results turned negative. Conclusion Chest CT has a high sensitivity for diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Chest CT may be considered as a primary tool for the current COVID-19 detection in epidemic areas. © RSNA, 2020
ترجمه چکیده این مقاله به فارسی، در ضمیمه موجود است. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1148/radiol.2020200642 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7233399</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2366638497</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-6e7c9a0bc503c3ccb854f4e843a0242e4d3923b52807d5822f44f948871dfdc93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1LAzEQhoMotlZ_gBfJsR625nM38SDI-lUQlFK9hjSbbSPbpCZbwX_vlmpV5jAw884zw7wAnGI0wpiJi6grF5oRQZtAOSN7oI85KTJMMd8HfYQozQTDsgeOUnpDCDMuikPQowQjzDHqg1SGGG2jWxc8DDUsFza1sJxC7Ss4mWbP5QROu5Lzc1iHCDt58PrDxXWCNy5ZnSwkCEs4LJ9exzcZlufQ-Q7jvL6E13BiVyG2G3K3kcGy06djcFDrJtmT7zwAL3e30_Ihe3y6H5fXj5lhOW-z3BZGajQzHFFDjZkJzmpmBaMaEUYsq6gkdMaJQEXFBSE1Y7VkQhS4qisj6QBcbbmr9WxpK2N9G3WjVtEtdfxUQTv1v-PdQs3DhyoIpVRuAMNvQAzv6-4LaumSsU2jvQ3rpAjN85wKJotOirdSE0NK0da7NRipjVlqa5b6NaubOft7327ixx36BdRkjd8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2366638497</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Correlation of Chest CT and RT-PCR Testing for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A Report of 1014 Cases</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Radiological Society of North America</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Ai, Tao ; Yang, Zhenlu ; Hou, Hongyan ; Zhan, Chenao ; Chen, Chong ; Lv, Wenzhi ; Tao, Qian ; Sun, Ziyong ; Xia, Liming</creator><creatorcontrib>Ai, Tao ; Yang, Zhenlu ; Hou, Hongyan ; Zhan, Chenao ; Chen, Chong ; Lv, Wenzhi ; Tao, Qian ; Sun, Ziyong ; Xia, Liming</creatorcontrib><description>Background Chest CT is used in the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and is an important complement to reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests. Purpose To investigate the diagnostic value and consistency of chest CT as compared with RT-PCR assay in COVID-19. Materials and Methods This study included 1014 patients in Wuhan, China, who underwent both chest CT and RT-PCR tests between January 6 and February 6, 2020. With use of RT-PCR as the reference standard, the performance of chest CT in the diagnosis of COVID-19 was assessed. In addition, for patients with multiple RT-PCR assays, the dynamic conversion of RT-PCR results (negative to positive, positive to negative) was analyzed as compared with serial chest CT scans for those with a time interval between RT-PCR tests of 4 days or more. Results Of the 1014 patients, 601 of 1014 (59%) had positive RT-PCR results and 888 of 1014 (88%) had positive chest CT scans. The sensitivity of chest CT in suggesting COVID-19 was 97% (95% confidence interval: 95%, 98%; 580 of 601 patients) based on positive RT-PCR results. In the 413 patients with negative RT-PCR results, 308 of 413 (75%) had positive chest CT findings. Of those 308 patients, 48% (103 of 308) were considered as highly likely cases and 33% (103 of 308) as probable cases. At analysis of serial RT-PCR assays and CT scans, the mean interval between the initial negative to positive RT-PCR results was 5.1 days ± 1.5; the mean interval between initial positive to subsequent negative RT-PCR results was 6.9 days ± 2.3. Of the 1014 patients, 60% (34 of 57) to 93% (14 of 15) had initial positive CT scans consistent with COVID-19 before (or parallel to) the initial positive RT-PCR results. Twenty-four of 57 patients (42%) showed improvement on follow-up chest CT scans before the RT-PCR results turned negative. Conclusion Chest CT has a high sensitivity for diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Chest CT may be considered as a primary tool for the current COVID-19 detection in epidemic areas. © RSNA, 2020
ترجمه چکیده این مقاله به فارسی، در ضمیمه موجود است.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-8419</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1527-1315</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-1315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020200642</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32101510</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Radiological Society of North America</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Betacoronavirus ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; China ; Clinical Laboratory Techniques - methods ; Coronavirus Infections - diagnosis ; Coronavirus Infections - diagnostic imaging ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 Testing ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Original Research ; Pandemics ; Pneumonia, Viral - diagnosis ; Pneumonia, Viral - diagnostic imaging ; Reproducibility of Results ; Retrospective Studies ; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Radiology, 2020-08, Vol.296 (2), p.E32-E40</ispartof><rights>2020 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-6e7c9a0bc503c3ccb854f4e843a0242e4d3923b52807d5822f44f948871dfdc93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-6e7c9a0bc503c3ccb854f4e843a0242e4d3923b52807d5822f44f948871dfdc93</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8481-3380 ; 0000-0001-7480-0703 ; 0000-0002-3735-7500 ; 0000-0001-7385-8073 ; 0000-0002-4083-1779 ; 0000-0003-4646-2799</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,4002,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32101510$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ai, Tao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Zhenlu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hou, Hongyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhan, Chenao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lv, Wenzhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tao, Qian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Ziyong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Liming</creatorcontrib><title>Correlation of Chest CT and RT-PCR Testing for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A Report of 1014 Cases</title><title>Radiology</title><addtitle>Radiology</addtitle><description>Background Chest CT is used in the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and is an important complement to reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests. Purpose To investigate the diagnostic value and consistency of chest CT as compared with RT-PCR assay in COVID-19. Materials and Methods This study included 1014 patients in Wuhan, China, who underwent both chest CT and RT-PCR tests between January 6 and February 6, 2020. With use of RT-PCR as the reference standard, the performance of chest CT in the diagnosis of COVID-19 was assessed. In addition, for patients with multiple RT-PCR assays, the dynamic conversion of RT-PCR results (negative to positive, positive to negative) was analyzed as compared with serial chest CT scans for those with a time interval between RT-PCR tests of 4 days or more. Results Of the 1014 patients, 601 of 1014 (59%) had positive RT-PCR results and 888 of 1014 (88%) had positive chest CT scans. The sensitivity of chest CT in suggesting COVID-19 was 97% (95% confidence interval: 95%, 98%; 580 of 601 patients) based on positive RT-PCR results. In the 413 patients with negative RT-PCR results, 308 of 413 (75%) had positive chest CT findings. Of those 308 patients, 48% (103 of 308) were considered as highly likely cases and 33% (103 of 308) as probable cases. At analysis of serial RT-PCR assays and CT scans, the mean interval between the initial negative to positive RT-PCR results was 5.1 days ± 1.5; the mean interval between initial positive to subsequent negative RT-PCR results was 6.9 days ± 2.3. Of the 1014 patients, 60% (34 of 57) to 93% (14 of 15) had initial positive CT scans consistent with COVID-19 before (or parallel to) the initial positive RT-PCR results. Twenty-four of 57 patients (42%) showed improvement on follow-up chest CT scans before the RT-PCR results turned negative. Conclusion Chest CT has a high sensitivity for diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Chest CT may be considered as a primary tool for the current COVID-19 detection in epidemic areas. © RSNA, 2020
ترجمه چکیده این مقاله به فارسی، در ضمیمه موجود است.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Betacoronavirus</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Clinical Laboratory Techniques - methods</subject><subject>Coronavirus Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Coronavirus Infections - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 Testing</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Pneumonia, Viral - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pneumonia, Viral - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0033-8419</issn><issn>1527-1315</issn><issn>1527-1315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkU1LAzEQhoMotlZ_gBfJsR625nM38SDI-lUQlFK9hjSbbSPbpCZbwX_vlmpV5jAw884zw7wAnGI0wpiJi6grF5oRQZtAOSN7oI85KTJMMd8HfYQozQTDsgeOUnpDCDMuikPQowQjzDHqg1SGGG2jWxc8DDUsFza1sJxC7Ss4mWbP5QROu5Lzc1iHCDt58PrDxXWCNy5ZnSwkCEs4LJ9exzcZlufQ-Q7jvL6E13BiVyG2G3K3kcGy06djcFDrJtmT7zwAL3e30_Ihe3y6H5fXj5lhOW-z3BZGajQzHFFDjZkJzmpmBaMaEUYsq6gkdMaJQEXFBSE1Y7VkQhS4qisj6QBcbbmr9WxpK2N9G3WjVtEtdfxUQTv1v-PdQs3DhyoIpVRuAMNvQAzv6-4LaumSsU2jvQ3rpAjN85wKJotOirdSE0NK0da7NRipjVlqa5b6NaubOft7327ixx36BdRkjd8</recordid><startdate>20200801</startdate><enddate>20200801</enddate><creator>Ai, Tao</creator><creator>Yang, Zhenlu</creator><creator>Hou, Hongyan</creator><creator>Zhan, Chenao</creator><creator>Chen, Chong</creator><creator>Lv, Wenzhi</creator><creator>Tao, Qian</creator><creator>Sun, Ziyong</creator><creator>Xia, Liming</creator><general>Radiological Society of North America</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8481-3380</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7480-0703</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3735-7500</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7385-8073</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4083-1779</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4646-2799</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200801</creationdate><title>Correlation of Chest CT and RT-PCR Testing for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A Report of 1014 Cases</title><author>Ai, Tao ; Yang, Zhenlu ; Hou, Hongyan ; Zhan, Chenao ; Chen, Chong ; Lv, Wenzhi ; Tao, Qian ; Sun, Ziyong ; Xia, Liming</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-6e7c9a0bc503c3ccb854f4e843a0242e4d3923b52807d5822f44f948871dfdc93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Betacoronavirus</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Clinical Laboratory Techniques - methods</topic><topic>Coronavirus Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Coronavirus Infections - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 Testing</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Pneumonia, Viral - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pneumonia, Viral - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ai, Tao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Zhenlu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hou, Hongyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhan, Chenao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lv, Wenzhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tao, Qian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Ziyong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Liming</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ai, Tao</au><au>Yang, Zhenlu</au><au>Hou, Hongyan</au><au>Zhan, Chenao</au><au>Chen, Chong</au><au>Lv, Wenzhi</au><au>Tao, Qian</au><au>Sun, Ziyong</au><au>Xia, Liming</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Correlation of Chest CT and RT-PCR Testing for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A Report of 1014 Cases</atitle><jtitle>Radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Radiology</addtitle><date>2020-08-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>296</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>E32</spage><epage>E40</epage><pages>E32-E40</pages><issn>0033-8419</issn><issn>1527-1315</issn><eissn>1527-1315</eissn><abstract>Background Chest CT is used in the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and is an important complement to reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests. Purpose To investigate the diagnostic value and consistency of chest CT as compared with RT-PCR assay in COVID-19. Materials and Methods This study included 1014 patients in Wuhan, China, who underwent both chest CT and RT-PCR tests between January 6 and February 6, 2020. With use of RT-PCR as the reference standard, the performance of chest CT in the diagnosis of COVID-19 was assessed. In addition, for patients with multiple RT-PCR assays, the dynamic conversion of RT-PCR results (negative to positive, positive to negative) was analyzed as compared with serial chest CT scans for those with a time interval between RT-PCR tests of 4 days or more. Results Of the 1014 patients, 601 of 1014 (59%) had positive RT-PCR results and 888 of 1014 (88%) had positive chest CT scans. The sensitivity of chest CT in suggesting COVID-19 was 97% (95% confidence interval: 95%, 98%; 580 of 601 patients) based on positive RT-PCR results. In the 413 patients with negative RT-PCR results, 308 of 413 (75%) had positive chest CT findings. Of those 308 patients, 48% (103 of 308) were considered as highly likely cases and 33% (103 of 308) as probable cases. At analysis of serial RT-PCR assays and CT scans, the mean interval between the initial negative to positive RT-PCR results was 5.1 days ± 1.5; the mean interval between initial positive to subsequent negative RT-PCR results was 6.9 days ± 2.3. Of the 1014 patients, 60% (34 of 57) to 93% (14 of 15) had initial positive CT scans consistent with COVID-19 before (or parallel to) the initial positive RT-PCR results. Twenty-four of 57 patients (42%) showed improvement on follow-up chest CT scans before the RT-PCR results turned negative. Conclusion Chest CT has a high sensitivity for diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Chest CT may be considered as a primary tool for the current COVID-19 detection in epidemic areas. © RSNA, 2020
ترجمه چکیده این مقاله به فارسی، در ضمیمه موجود است.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Radiological Society of North America</pub><pmid>32101510</pmid><doi>10.1148/radiol.2020200642</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8481-3380</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7480-0703</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3735-7500</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7385-8073</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4083-1779</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4646-2799</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-8419 |
ispartof | Radiology, 2020-08, Vol.296 (2), p.E32-E40 |
issn | 0033-8419 1527-1315 1527-1315 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7233399 |
source | MEDLINE; Radiological Society of North America; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Betacoronavirus Child Child, Preschool China Clinical Laboratory Techniques - methods Coronavirus Infections - diagnosis Coronavirus Infections - diagnostic imaging COVID-19 COVID-19 Testing Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Male Middle Aged Original Research Pandemics Pneumonia, Viral - diagnosis Pneumonia, Viral - diagnostic imaging Reproducibility of Results Retrospective Studies Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction SARS-CoV-2 Sensitivity and Specificity Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods Young Adult |
title | Correlation of Chest CT and RT-PCR Testing for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A Report of 1014 Cases |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T02%3A14%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Correlation%20of%20Chest%20CT%20and%20RT-PCR%20Testing%20for%20Coronavirus%20Disease%202019%20(COVID-19)%20in%20China:%20A%20Report%20of%201014%20Cases&rft.jtitle=Radiology&rft.au=Ai,%20Tao&rft.date=2020-08-01&rft.volume=296&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=E32&rft.epage=E40&rft.pages=E32-E40&rft.issn=0033-8419&rft.eissn=1527-1315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2020200642&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2366638497%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2366638497&rft_id=info:pmid/32101510&rfr_iscdi=true |