Correlation of Chest CT and RT-PCR Testing for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A Report of 1014 Cases

Background Chest CT is used in the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and is an important complement to reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests. Purpose To investigate the diagnostic value and consistency of chest CT as compared with RT-PCR assay in COVID-19. Mat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Radiology 2020-08, Vol.296 (2), p.E32-E40
Hauptverfasser: Ai, Tao, Yang, Zhenlu, Hou, Hongyan, Zhan, Chenao, Chen, Chong, Lv, Wenzhi, Tao, Qian, Sun, Ziyong, Xia, Liming
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page E40
container_issue 2
container_start_page E32
container_title Radiology
container_volume 296
creator Ai, Tao
Yang, Zhenlu
Hou, Hongyan
Zhan, Chenao
Chen, Chong
Lv, Wenzhi
Tao, Qian
Sun, Ziyong
Xia, Liming
description Background Chest CT is used in the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and is an important complement to reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests. Purpose To investigate the diagnostic value and consistency of chest CT as compared with RT-PCR assay in COVID-19. Materials and Methods This study included 1014 patients in Wuhan, China, who underwent both chest CT and RT-PCR tests between January 6 and February 6, 2020. With use of RT-PCR as the reference standard, the performance of chest CT in the diagnosis of COVID-19 was assessed. In addition, for patients with multiple RT-PCR assays, the dynamic conversion of RT-PCR results (negative to positive, positive to negative) was analyzed as compared with serial chest CT scans for those with a time interval between RT-PCR tests of 4 days or more. Results Of the 1014 patients, 601 of 1014 (59%) had positive RT-PCR results and 888 of 1014 (88%) had positive chest CT scans. The sensitivity of chest CT in suggesting COVID-19 was 97% (95% confidence interval: 95%, 98%; 580 of 601 patients) based on positive RT-PCR results. In the 413 patients with negative RT-PCR results, 308 of 413 (75%) had positive chest CT findings. Of those 308 patients, 48% (103 of 308) were considered as highly likely cases and 33% (103 of 308) as probable cases. At analysis of serial RT-PCR assays and CT scans, the mean interval between the initial negative to positive RT-PCR results was 5.1 days ± 1.5; the mean interval between initial positive to subsequent negative RT-PCR results was 6.9 days ± 2.3. Of the 1014 patients, 60% (34 of 57) to 93% (14 of 15) had initial positive CT scans consistent with COVID-19 before (or parallel to) the initial positive RT-PCR results. Twenty-four of 57 patients (42%) showed improvement on follow-up chest CT scans before the RT-PCR results turned negative. Conclusion Chest CT has a high sensitivity for diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Chest CT may be considered as a primary tool for the current COVID-19 detection in epidemic areas. © RSNA, 2020 ترجمه چکیده این مقاله به فارسی، در ضمیمه موجود است.
doi_str_mv 10.1148/radiol.2020200642
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7233399</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2366638497</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-6e7c9a0bc503c3ccb854f4e843a0242e4d3923b52807d5822f44f948871dfdc93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1LAzEQhoMotlZ_gBfJsR625nM38SDI-lUQlFK9hjSbbSPbpCZbwX_vlmpV5jAw884zw7wAnGI0wpiJi6grF5oRQZtAOSN7oI85KTJMMd8HfYQozQTDsgeOUnpDCDMuikPQowQjzDHqg1SGGG2jWxc8DDUsFza1sJxC7Ss4mWbP5QROu5Lzc1iHCDt58PrDxXWCNy5ZnSwkCEs4LJ9exzcZlufQ-Q7jvL6E13BiVyG2G3K3kcGy06djcFDrJtmT7zwAL3e30_Ihe3y6H5fXj5lhOW-z3BZGajQzHFFDjZkJzmpmBaMaEUYsq6gkdMaJQEXFBSE1Y7VkQhS4qisj6QBcbbmr9WxpK2N9G3WjVtEtdfxUQTv1v-PdQs3DhyoIpVRuAMNvQAzv6-4LaumSsU2jvQ3rpAjN85wKJotOirdSE0NK0da7NRipjVlqa5b6NaubOft7327ixx36BdRkjd8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2366638497</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Correlation of Chest CT and RT-PCR Testing for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A Report of 1014 Cases</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Radiological Society of North America</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Ai, Tao ; Yang, Zhenlu ; Hou, Hongyan ; Zhan, Chenao ; Chen, Chong ; Lv, Wenzhi ; Tao, Qian ; Sun, Ziyong ; Xia, Liming</creator><creatorcontrib>Ai, Tao ; Yang, Zhenlu ; Hou, Hongyan ; Zhan, Chenao ; Chen, Chong ; Lv, Wenzhi ; Tao, Qian ; Sun, Ziyong ; Xia, Liming</creatorcontrib><description>Background Chest CT is used in the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and is an important complement to reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests. Purpose To investigate the diagnostic value and consistency of chest CT as compared with RT-PCR assay in COVID-19. Materials and Methods This study included 1014 patients in Wuhan, China, who underwent both chest CT and RT-PCR tests between January 6 and February 6, 2020. With use of RT-PCR as the reference standard, the performance of chest CT in the diagnosis of COVID-19 was assessed. In addition, for patients with multiple RT-PCR assays, the dynamic conversion of RT-PCR results (negative to positive, positive to negative) was analyzed as compared with serial chest CT scans for those with a time interval between RT-PCR tests of 4 days or more. Results Of the 1014 patients, 601 of 1014 (59%) had positive RT-PCR results and 888 of 1014 (88%) had positive chest CT scans. The sensitivity of chest CT in suggesting COVID-19 was 97% (95% confidence interval: 95%, 98%; 580 of 601 patients) based on positive RT-PCR results. In the 413 patients with negative RT-PCR results, 308 of 413 (75%) had positive chest CT findings. Of those 308 patients, 48% (103 of 308) were considered as highly likely cases and 33% (103 of 308) as probable cases. At analysis of serial RT-PCR assays and CT scans, the mean interval between the initial negative to positive RT-PCR results was 5.1 days ± 1.5; the mean interval between initial positive to subsequent negative RT-PCR results was 6.9 days ± 2.3. Of the 1014 patients, 60% (34 of 57) to 93% (14 of 15) had initial positive CT scans consistent with COVID-19 before (or parallel to) the initial positive RT-PCR results. Twenty-four of 57 patients (42%) showed improvement on follow-up chest CT scans before the RT-PCR results turned negative. Conclusion Chest CT has a high sensitivity for diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Chest CT may be considered as a primary tool for the current COVID-19 detection in epidemic areas. © RSNA, 2020 ترجمه چکیده این مقاله به فارسی، در ضمیمه موجود است.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-8419</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1527-1315</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-1315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020200642</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32101510</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Radiological Society of North America</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Betacoronavirus ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; China ; Clinical Laboratory Techniques - methods ; Coronavirus Infections - diagnosis ; Coronavirus Infections - diagnostic imaging ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 Testing ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Original Research ; Pandemics ; Pneumonia, Viral - diagnosis ; Pneumonia, Viral - diagnostic imaging ; Reproducibility of Results ; Retrospective Studies ; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Radiology, 2020-08, Vol.296 (2), p.E32-E40</ispartof><rights>2020 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-6e7c9a0bc503c3ccb854f4e843a0242e4d3923b52807d5822f44f948871dfdc93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-6e7c9a0bc503c3ccb854f4e843a0242e4d3923b52807d5822f44f948871dfdc93</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8481-3380 ; 0000-0001-7480-0703 ; 0000-0002-3735-7500 ; 0000-0001-7385-8073 ; 0000-0002-4083-1779 ; 0000-0003-4646-2799</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,4002,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32101510$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ai, Tao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Zhenlu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hou, Hongyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhan, Chenao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lv, Wenzhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tao, Qian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Ziyong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Liming</creatorcontrib><title>Correlation of Chest CT and RT-PCR Testing for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A Report of 1014 Cases</title><title>Radiology</title><addtitle>Radiology</addtitle><description>Background Chest CT is used in the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and is an important complement to reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests. Purpose To investigate the diagnostic value and consistency of chest CT as compared with RT-PCR assay in COVID-19. Materials and Methods This study included 1014 patients in Wuhan, China, who underwent both chest CT and RT-PCR tests between January 6 and February 6, 2020. With use of RT-PCR as the reference standard, the performance of chest CT in the diagnosis of COVID-19 was assessed. In addition, for patients with multiple RT-PCR assays, the dynamic conversion of RT-PCR results (negative to positive, positive to negative) was analyzed as compared with serial chest CT scans for those with a time interval between RT-PCR tests of 4 days or more. Results Of the 1014 patients, 601 of 1014 (59%) had positive RT-PCR results and 888 of 1014 (88%) had positive chest CT scans. The sensitivity of chest CT in suggesting COVID-19 was 97% (95% confidence interval: 95%, 98%; 580 of 601 patients) based on positive RT-PCR results. In the 413 patients with negative RT-PCR results, 308 of 413 (75%) had positive chest CT findings. Of those 308 patients, 48% (103 of 308) were considered as highly likely cases and 33% (103 of 308) as probable cases. At analysis of serial RT-PCR assays and CT scans, the mean interval between the initial negative to positive RT-PCR results was 5.1 days ± 1.5; the mean interval between initial positive to subsequent negative RT-PCR results was 6.9 days ± 2.3. Of the 1014 patients, 60% (34 of 57) to 93% (14 of 15) had initial positive CT scans consistent with COVID-19 before (or parallel to) the initial positive RT-PCR results. Twenty-four of 57 patients (42%) showed improvement on follow-up chest CT scans before the RT-PCR results turned negative. Conclusion Chest CT has a high sensitivity for diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Chest CT may be considered as a primary tool for the current COVID-19 detection in epidemic areas. © RSNA, 2020 ترجمه چکیده این مقاله به فارسی، در ضمیمه موجود است.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Betacoronavirus</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Clinical Laboratory Techniques - methods</subject><subject>Coronavirus Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Coronavirus Infections - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 Testing</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Pneumonia, Viral - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pneumonia, Viral - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0033-8419</issn><issn>1527-1315</issn><issn>1527-1315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkU1LAzEQhoMotlZ_gBfJsR625nM38SDI-lUQlFK9hjSbbSPbpCZbwX_vlmpV5jAw884zw7wAnGI0wpiJi6grF5oRQZtAOSN7oI85KTJMMd8HfYQozQTDsgeOUnpDCDMuikPQowQjzDHqg1SGGG2jWxc8DDUsFza1sJxC7Ss4mWbP5QROu5Lzc1iHCDt58PrDxXWCNy5ZnSwkCEs4LJ9exzcZlufQ-Q7jvL6E13BiVyG2G3K3kcGy06djcFDrJtmT7zwAL3e30_Ihe3y6H5fXj5lhOW-z3BZGajQzHFFDjZkJzmpmBaMaEUYsq6gkdMaJQEXFBSE1Y7VkQhS4qisj6QBcbbmr9WxpK2N9G3WjVtEtdfxUQTv1v-PdQs3DhyoIpVRuAMNvQAzv6-4LaumSsU2jvQ3rpAjN85wKJotOirdSE0NK0da7NRipjVlqa5b6NaubOft7327ixx36BdRkjd8</recordid><startdate>20200801</startdate><enddate>20200801</enddate><creator>Ai, Tao</creator><creator>Yang, Zhenlu</creator><creator>Hou, Hongyan</creator><creator>Zhan, Chenao</creator><creator>Chen, Chong</creator><creator>Lv, Wenzhi</creator><creator>Tao, Qian</creator><creator>Sun, Ziyong</creator><creator>Xia, Liming</creator><general>Radiological Society of North America</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8481-3380</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7480-0703</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3735-7500</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7385-8073</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4083-1779</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4646-2799</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200801</creationdate><title>Correlation of Chest CT and RT-PCR Testing for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A Report of 1014 Cases</title><author>Ai, Tao ; Yang, Zhenlu ; Hou, Hongyan ; Zhan, Chenao ; Chen, Chong ; Lv, Wenzhi ; Tao, Qian ; Sun, Ziyong ; Xia, Liming</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-6e7c9a0bc503c3ccb854f4e843a0242e4d3923b52807d5822f44f948871dfdc93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Betacoronavirus</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Clinical Laboratory Techniques - methods</topic><topic>Coronavirus Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Coronavirus Infections - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 Testing</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Pneumonia, Viral - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pneumonia, Viral - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ai, Tao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Zhenlu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hou, Hongyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhan, Chenao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lv, Wenzhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tao, Qian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Ziyong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Liming</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ai, Tao</au><au>Yang, Zhenlu</au><au>Hou, Hongyan</au><au>Zhan, Chenao</au><au>Chen, Chong</au><au>Lv, Wenzhi</au><au>Tao, Qian</au><au>Sun, Ziyong</au><au>Xia, Liming</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Correlation of Chest CT and RT-PCR Testing for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A Report of 1014 Cases</atitle><jtitle>Radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Radiology</addtitle><date>2020-08-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>296</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>E32</spage><epage>E40</epage><pages>E32-E40</pages><issn>0033-8419</issn><issn>1527-1315</issn><eissn>1527-1315</eissn><abstract>Background Chest CT is used in the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and is an important complement to reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests. Purpose To investigate the diagnostic value and consistency of chest CT as compared with RT-PCR assay in COVID-19. Materials and Methods This study included 1014 patients in Wuhan, China, who underwent both chest CT and RT-PCR tests between January 6 and February 6, 2020. With use of RT-PCR as the reference standard, the performance of chest CT in the diagnosis of COVID-19 was assessed. In addition, for patients with multiple RT-PCR assays, the dynamic conversion of RT-PCR results (negative to positive, positive to negative) was analyzed as compared with serial chest CT scans for those with a time interval between RT-PCR tests of 4 days or more. Results Of the 1014 patients, 601 of 1014 (59%) had positive RT-PCR results and 888 of 1014 (88%) had positive chest CT scans. The sensitivity of chest CT in suggesting COVID-19 was 97% (95% confidence interval: 95%, 98%; 580 of 601 patients) based on positive RT-PCR results. In the 413 patients with negative RT-PCR results, 308 of 413 (75%) had positive chest CT findings. Of those 308 patients, 48% (103 of 308) were considered as highly likely cases and 33% (103 of 308) as probable cases. At analysis of serial RT-PCR assays and CT scans, the mean interval between the initial negative to positive RT-PCR results was 5.1 days ± 1.5; the mean interval between initial positive to subsequent negative RT-PCR results was 6.9 days ± 2.3. Of the 1014 patients, 60% (34 of 57) to 93% (14 of 15) had initial positive CT scans consistent with COVID-19 before (or parallel to) the initial positive RT-PCR results. Twenty-four of 57 patients (42%) showed improvement on follow-up chest CT scans before the RT-PCR results turned negative. Conclusion Chest CT has a high sensitivity for diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Chest CT may be considered as a primary tool for the current COVID-19 detection in epidemic areas. © RSNA, 2020 ترجمه چکیده این مقاله به فارسی، در ضمیمه موجود است.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Radiological Society of North America</pub><pmid>32101510</pmid><doi>10.1148/radiol.2020200642</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8481-3380</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7480-0703</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3735-7500</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7385-8073</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4083-1779</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4646-2799</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-8419
ispartof Radiology, 2020-08, Vol.296 (2), p.E32-E40
issn 0033-8419
1527-1315
1527-1315
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7233399
source MEDLINE; Radiological Society of North America; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Betacoronavirus
Child
Child, Preschool
China
Clinical Laboratory Techniques - methods
Coronavirus Infections - diagnosis
Coronavirus Infections - diagnostic imaging
COVID-19
COVID-19 Testing
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Original Research
Pandemics
Pneumonia, Viral - diagnosis
Pneumonia, Viral - diagnostic imaging
Reproducibility of Results
Retrospective Studies
Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
SARS-CoV-2
Sensitivity and Specificity
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
Young Adult
title Correlation of Chest CT and RT-PCR Testing for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A Report of 1014 Cases
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T02%3A14%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Correlation%20of%20Chest%20CT%20and%20RT-PCR%20Testing%20for%20Coronavirus%20Disease%202019%20(COVID-19)%20in%20China:%20A%20Report%20of%201014%20Cases&rft.jtitle=Radiology&rft.au=Ai,%20Tao&rft.date=2020-08-01&rft.volume=296&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=E32&rft.epage=E40&rft.pages=E32-E40&rft.issn=0033-8419&rft.eissn=1527-1315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2020200642&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2366638497%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2366638497&rft_id=info:pmid/32101510&rfr_iscdi=true