Uncuffed Endotracheal Tube Experience in Pediatric Patients with Laparotomy and Laparoscopic Surgeries
Aim. The aim of this study is to compare endotracheal tube leak, tube selection, mechanical ventilation, and side effects in the use of uncuffed tubes in both laparoscopic and laparotomy surgeries in pediatric patients. Material and Method. Patients who underwent laparotomy (LT group) or laparoscopi...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | BioMed research international 2020, Vol.2020 (2020), p.1-5 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 5 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2020 |
| container_start_page | 1 |
| container_title | BioMed research international |
| container_volume | 2020 |
| creator | Kılıç, Yeliz Onay, Meryem Kayhan, Gulay Erdogan Şanal Baş, Sema |
| description | Aim. The aim of this study is to compare endotracheal tube leak, tube selection, mechanical ventilation, and side effects in the use of uncuffed tubes in both laparoscopic and laparotomy surgeries in pediatric patients. Material and Method. Patients who underwent laparotomy (LT group) or laparoscopic (LS group) surgery between 1 and 60 months. In the selection of uncuffed tubes, it was also planned to start endotracheal intubation with the largest uncuffed tube and to start intubation with a small uncuffed tube if the tube encounters resistance and does not pass. Mechanical parameters, endotracheal tube size, tube changes, and side effects are recorded. Results. A total of 102 patients, 38 females and 64 males, with a mean age of 10.9±8.1 months, body weight 7.1±3.7 kg, and height 67±15 cm, were included. 54 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery, and 48 patients underwent laparotomy. Tube exchange was performed in a total of 18 patients. In patients who underwent tube exchange, 11 patients were intubated with a smaller ETT number and others endotracheal intubation; when the MV parameters were TVe20%, a larger uncuffed tube was used due to PIP 30 cmH2O pressure. Patients with aspiration were not found in the LT and LS groups. There was no difference in the intergroup evaluation for postoperative side effects such as cough, laryngospasm, stridor, and aspiration. Conclusion. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of tube changes and side effects. So that we can start with the largest possible uncuffed tube to decrease ETT leak, both laparotomy and laparoscopic operations in children can be achieved with safe mechanical ventilation and target tidal volume. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1155/2020/6325293 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7232717</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A629053484</galeid><sourcerecordid>A629053484</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-ee8c9bbaedbcad28e66989a92bedb555bbb6984f6bbcb5d7bca55fd8d56af2823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1v1DAQxSMEolXpjTOKxAUJlvojdpILUlVtAWklKtGerbE93nWVdYKdtPS_r8MuW-CEL_aMf3qaN68oXlPykVIhzhhh5ExyJljLnxXHjNNqIWlFnx_enB8VpyndknwaKkkrXxZHnFWSESKPC3cTzOQc2nIZbD9GMBuErryeNJbLnwNGj8Fg6UN5hdbDGL0pr2DM3TGV937clCsYIPZjv30oIdh9mUw_ZPL7FNezRHpVvHDQJTzd3yfFzeXy-uLLYvXt89eL89XCVEKOC8TGtFoDWm3AsgalbJsWWqZzRwihtc6NykmtjRa2zpQQzjZWSHCsYfyk-LTTHSa9RWvymBE6NUS_hfigevDq75_gN2rd36macVbTOgu82wvE_seEaVRbnwx2HQTsp6RYRWpRt1LM6Nt_0Nt-iiHbmyne1IxV4olaQ4fKB_drybOoOpesJYJXTZWpDzvK5N2liO4wMiVqTlrNSat90hl_86fNA_w71wy83wEbHyzc-_-Uw8yggyea8my05o8c-bv1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2403872245</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Uncuffed Endotracheal Tube Experience in Pediatric Patients with Laparotomy and Laparoscopic Surgeries</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Kılıç, Yeliz ; Onay, Meryem ; Kayhan, Gulay Erdogan ; Şanal Baş, Sema</creator><contributor>Muraskas, Jonathan</contributor><creatorcontrib>Kılıç, Yeliz ; Onay, Meryem ; Kayhan, Gulay Erdogan ; Şanal Baş, Sema ; Muraskas, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><description>Aim. The aim of this study is to compare endotracheal tube leak, tube selection, mechanical ventilation, and side effects in the use of uncuffed tubes in both laparoscopic and laparotomy surgeries in pediatric patients. Material and Method. Patients who underwent laparotomy (LT group) or laparoscopic (LS group) surgery between 1 and 60 months. In the selection of uncuffed tubes, it was also planned to start endotracheal intubation with the largest uncuffed tube and to start intubation with a small uncuffed tube if the tube encounters resistance and does not pass. Mechanical parameters, endotracheal tube size, tube changes, and side effects are recorded. Results. A total of 102 patients, 38 females and 64 males, with a mean age of 10.9±8.1 months, body weight 7.1±3.7 kg, and height 67±15 cm, were included. 54 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery, and 48 patients underwent laparotomy. Tube exchange was performed in a total of 18 patients. In patients who underwent tube exchange, 11 patients were intubated with a smaller ETT number and others endotracheal intubation; when the MV parameters were TVe<8 ml/kg and ETT leak>20%, a larger uncuffed tube was used due to PIP 30 cmH2O pressure. Patients with aspiration were not found in the LT and LS groups. There was no difference in the intergroup evaluation for postoperative side effects such as cough, laryngospasm, stridor, and aspiration. Conclusion. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of tube changes and side effects. So that we can start with the largest possible uncuffed tube to decrease ETT leak, both laparotomy and laparoscopic operations in children can be achieved with safe mechanical ventilation and target tidal volume.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2314-6133</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2314-6141</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2020/6325293</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32462006</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cairo, Egypt: Hindawi Publishing Corporation</publisher><subject>Abdomen ; Age ; Anesthesia ; Biopsy ; Body weight ; Carbon dioxide ; Children ; Cough ; Exchanging ; Female ; Health aspects ; Hernias ; Humans ; Infant ; Intubation ; Intubation, Intratracheal - adverse effects ; Intubation, Intratracheal - instrumentation ; Intubation, Intratracheal - methods ; Intubation, Intratracheal - statistics & numerical data ; Laparoscopic surgery ; Laparoscopy ; Laparotomy ; Larynx ; Male ; Mechanical properties ; Mechanical ventilation ; Ostomy ; Parameters ; Patients ; Pediatrics ; Planning ; Remifentanil ; Respiration ; Retrospective Studies ; Side effects ; Surgery ; Tubes ; Values ; Ventilation</subject><ispartof>BioMed research international, 2020, Vol.2020 (2020), p.1-5</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2020 Sema Şanal Baş et al.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Sema Şanal Baş et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Sema Şanal Baş et al. 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-ee8c9bbaedbcad28e66989a92bedb555bbb6984f6bbcb5d7bca55fd8d56af2823</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2943-0456 ; 0000-0003-1446-7747 ; 0000-0002-2635-9295 ; 0000-0002-5028-9135</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7232717/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7232717/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,4010,27900,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32462006$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Muraskas, Jonathan</contributor><creatorcontrib>Kılıç, Yeliz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onay, Meryem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kayhan, Gulay Erdogan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Şanal Baş, Sema</creatorcontrib><title>Uncuffed Endotracheal Tube Experience in Pediatric Patients with Laparotomy and Laparoscopic Surgeries</title><title>BioMed research international</title><addtitle>Biomed Res Int</addtitle><description>Aim. The aim of this study is to compare endotracheal tube leak, tube selection, mechanical ventilation, and side effects in the use of uncuffed tubes in both laparoscopic and laparotomy surgeries in pediatric patients. Material and Method. Patients who underwent laparotomy (LT group) or laparoscopic (LS group) surgery between 1 and 60 months. In the selection of uncuffed tubes, it was also planned to start endotracheal intubation with the largest uncuffed tube and to start intubation with a small uncuffed tube if the tube encounters resistance and does not pass. Mechanical parameters, endotracheal tube size, tube changes, and side effects are recorded. Results. A total of 102 patients, 38 females and 64 males, with a mean age of 10.9±8.1 months, body weight 7.1±3.7 kg, and height 67±15 cm, were included. 54 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery, and 48 patients underwent laparotomy. Tube exchange was performed in a total of 18 patients. In patients who underwent tube exchange, 11 patients were intubated with a smaller ETT number and others endotracheal intubation; when the MV parameters were TVe<8 ml/kg and ETT leak>20%, a larger uncuffed tube was used due to PIP 30 cmH2O pressure. Patients with aspiration were not found in the LT and LS groups. There was no difference in the intergroup evaluation for postoperative side effects such as cough, laryngospasm, stridor, and aspiration. Conclusion. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of tube changes and side effects. So that we can start with the largest possible uncuffed tube to decrease ETT leak, both laparotomy and laparoscopic operations in children can be achieved with safe mechanical ventilation and target tidal volume.</description><subject>Abdomen</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Body weight</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Cough</subject><subject>Exchanging</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Hernias</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Intubation</subject><subject>Intubation, Intratracheal - adverse effects</subject><subject>Intubation, Intratracheal - instrumentation</subject><subject>Intubation, Intratracheal - methods</subject><subject>Intubation, Intratracheal - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Laparoscopic surgery</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Laparotomy</subject><subject>Larynx</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Mechanical ventilation</subject><subject>Ostomy</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Remifentanil</subject><subject>Respiration</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Side effects</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Tubes</subject><subject>Values</subject><subject>Ventilation</subject><issn>2314-6133</issn><issn>2314-6141</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RHX</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1v1DAQxSMEolXpjTOKxAUJlvojdpILUlVtAWklKtGerbE93nWVdYKdtPS_r8MuW-CEL_aMf3qaN68oXlPykVIhzhhh5ExyJljLnxXHjNNqIWlFnx_enB8VpyndknwaKkkrXxZHnFWSESKPC3cTzOQc2nIZbD9GMBuErryeNJbLnwNGj8Fg6UN5hdbDGL0pr2DM3TGV937clCsYIPZjv30oIdh9mUw_ZPL7FNezRHpVvHDQJTzd3yfFzeXy-uLLYvXt89eL89XCVEKOC8TGtFoDWm3AsgalbJsWWqZzRwihtc6NykmtjRa2zpQQzjZWSHCsYfyk-LTTHSa9RWvymBE6NUS_hfigevDq75_gN2rd36macVbTOgu82wvE_seEaVRbnwx2HQTsp6RYRWpRt1LM6Nt_0Nt-iiHbmyne1IxV4olaQ4fKB_drybOoOpesJYJXTZWpDzvK5N2liO4wMiVqTlrNSat90hl_86fNA_w71wy83wEbHyzc-_-Uw8yggyea8my05o8c-bv1</recordid><startdate>2020</startdate><enddate>2020</enddate><creator>Kılıç, Yeliz</creator><creator>Onay, Meryem</creator><creator>Kayhan, Gulay Erdogan</creator><creator>Şanal Baş, Sema</creator><general>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</general><general>Hindawi</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>ADJCN</scope><scope>AHFXO</scope><scope>RHU</scope><scope>RHW</scope><scope>RHX</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CWDGH</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2943-0456</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1446-7747</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2635-9295</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5028-9135</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2020</creationdate><title>Uncuffed Endotracheal Tube Experience in Pediatric Patients with Laparotomy and Laparoscopic Surgeries</title><author>Kılıç, Yeliz ; Onay, Meryem ; Kayhan, Gulay Erdogan ; Şanal Baş, Sema</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-ee8c9bbaedbcad28e66989a92bedb555bbb6984f6bbcb5d7bca55fd8d56af2823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Abdomen</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Body weight</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Cough</topic><topic>Exchanging</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Hernias</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Intubation</topic><topic>Intubation, Intratracheal - adverse effects</topic><topic>Intubation, Intratracheal - instrumentation</topic><topic>Intubation, Intratracheal - methods</topic><topic>Intubation, Intratracheal - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Laparoscopic surgery</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Laparotomy</topic><topic>Larynx</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Mechanical ventilation</topic><topic>Ostomy</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Remifentanil</topic><topic>Respiration</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Side effects</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Tubes</topic><topic>Values</topic><topic>Ventilation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kılıç, Yeliz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onay, Meryem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kayhan, Gulay Erdogan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Şanal Baş, Sema</creatorcontrib><collection>الدوريات العلمية والإحصائية - e-Marefa Academic and Statistical Periodicals</collection><collection>معرفة - المحتوى العربي الأكاديمي المتكامل - e-Marefa Academic Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Middle East & Africa Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BioMed research international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kılıç, Yeliz</au><au>Onay, Meryem</au><au>Kayhan, Gulay Erdogan</au><au>Şanal Baş, Sema</au><au>Muraskas, Jonathan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Uncuffed Endotracheal Tube Experience in Pediatric Patients with Laparotomy and Laparoscopic Surgeries</atitle><jtitle>BioMed research international</jtitle><addtitle>Biomed Res Int</addtitle><date>2020</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>2020</volume><issue>2020</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>5</epage><pages>1-5</pages><issn>2314-6133</issn><eissn>2314-6141</eissn><abstract>Aim. The aim of this study is to compare endotracheal tube leak, tube selection, mechanical ventilation, and side effects in the use of uncuffed tubes in both laparoscopic and laparotomy surgeries in pediatric patients. Material and Method. Patients who underwent laparotomy (LT group) or laparoscopic (LS group) surgery between 1 and 60 months. In the selection of uncuffed tubes, it was also planned to start endotracheal intubation with the largest uncuffed tube and to start intubation with a small uncuffed tube if the tube encounters resistance and does not pass. Mechanical parameters, endotracheal tube size, tube changes, and side effects are recorded. Results. A total of 102 patients, 38 females and 64 males, with a mean age of 10.9±8.1 months, body weight 7.1±3.7 kg, and height 67±15 cm, were included. 54 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery, and 48 patients underwent laparotomy. Tube exchange was performed in a total of 18 patients. In patients who underwent tube exchange, 11 patients were intubated with a smaller ETT number and others endotracheal intubation; when the MV parameters were TVe<8 ml/kg and ETT leak>20%, a larger uncuffed tube was used due to PIP 30 cmH2O pressure. Patients with aspiration were not found in the LT and LS groups. There was no difference in the intergroup evaluation for postoperative side effects such as cough, laryngospasm, stridor, and aspiration. Conclusion. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of tube changes and side effects. So that we can start with the largest possible uncuffed tube to decrease ETT leak, both laparotomy and laparoscopic operations in children can be achieved with safe mechanical ventilation and target tidal volume.</abstract><cop>Cairo, Egypt</cop><pub>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</pub><pmid>32462006</pmid><doi>10.1155/2020/6325293</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2943-0456</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1446-7747</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2635-9295</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5028-9135</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2314-6133 |
| ispartof | BioMed research international, 2020, Vol.2020 (2020), p.1-5 |
| issn | 2314-6133 2314-6141 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7232717 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Open Access; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; PubMed Central Open Access |
| subjects | Abdomen Age Anesthesia Biopsy Body weight Carbon dioxide Children Cough Exchanging Female Health aspects Hernias Humans Infant Intubation Intubation, Intratracheal - adverse effects Intubation, Intratracheal - instrumentation Intubation, Intratracheal - methods Intubation, Intratracheal - statistics & numerical data Laparoscopic surgery Laparoscopy Laparotomy Larynx Male Mechanical properties Mechanical ventilation Ostomy Parameters Patients Pediatrics Planning Remifentanil Respiration Retrospective Studies Side effects Surgery Tubes Values Ventilation |
| title | Uncuffed Endotracheal Tube Experience in Pediatric Patients with Laparotomy and Laparoscopic Surgeries |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T22%3A53%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Uncuffed%20Endotracheal%20Tube%20Experience%20in%20Pediatric%20Patients%20with%20Laparotomy%20and%20Laparoscopic%20Surgeries&rft.jtitle=BioMed%20research%20international&rft.au=K%C4%B1l%C4%B1%C3%A7,%20Yeliz&rft.date=2020&rft.volume=2020&rft.issue=2020&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=5&rft.pages=1-5&rft.issn=2314-6133&rft.eissn=2314-6141&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2020/6325293&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA629053484%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2403872245&rft_id=info:pmid/32462006&rft_galeid=A629053484&rfr_iscdi=true |