Approximations to the Voice of a Cochlear Implant: Explorations With Single-Sided Deaf Listeners
Fourteen single-sided deaf listeners fit with an MED-EL cochlear implant (CI) judged the similarity of clean signals presented to their CI and modified signals presented to their normal-hearing ear. The signals to the normal-hearing ear were created by (a) filtering, (b) spectral smearing, (c) chang...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Trends in hearing 2020, Vol.24, p.2331216520920079-2331216520920079 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2331216520920079 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 2331216520920079 |
container_title | Trends in hearing |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Dorman, Michael F. Natale, Sarah Cook Baxter, Leslie Zeitler, Daniel M. Carlson, Matthew L. Lorens, Artur Skarzynski, Henryk Peters, Jeroen P. M. Torres, Jennifer H. Noble, Jack H. |
description | Fourteen single-sided deaf listeners fit with an MED-EL cochlear implant (CI) judged the similarity of clean signals presented to their CI and modified signals presented to their normal-hearing ear. The signals to the normal-hearing ear were created by (a) filtering, (b) spectral smearing, (c) changing overall fundamental frequency (F0), (d) F0 contour flattening, (e) changing formant frequencies, (f) altering resonances and ring times to create a metallic sound quality, (g) using a noise vocoder, or (h) using a sine vocoder. The operations could be used singly or in any combination. On a scale of 1 to 10 where 10 was a complete match to the sound of the CI, the mean match score was 8.8. Over half of the matches were 9.0 or higher. The most common alterations to a clean signal were band-pass or low-pass filtering, spectral peak smearing, and F0 contour flattening. On average, 3.4 operations were used to create a match. Upshifts in formant frequencies were implemented most often for electrode insertion angles less than approximately 500°. A relatively small set of operations can produce signals that approximate the sound of the MED-EL CI. There are large individual differences in the combination of operations needed. The sound files in Supplemental Material approximate the sound of the MED-EL CI for patients fit with 28-mm electrode arrays. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/2331216520920079 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7225791</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_2331216520920079</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2395600193</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-b2ebf17c88500883b1f373de394a9ba3905fdb55c33edbdb45071e04d305dc8b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtP3DAUhS1UBAjYd4UsddNNwI84TlhUQgMFpJG6oI-l68fNjFEmTm1PRf99PZoppUhd2br3u8f3-CD0lpJzSqW8YJxTRhvBSMcIkd0eOtqUqk3tzYv7ITpN6ZEQQpkQsmEH6JCXZkckO0Lfr6Yphie_0tmHMeEccF4C_hq8BRx6rPEs2OUAOuL71TToMV_im6dpCHE38M3nJX7w42KA6sE7cPgadI_nPmUYIaYTtN_rIcHp7jxGXz7efJ7dVfNPt_ezq3ll64blyjAwPZW2bQUhbcsN7bnkDnhX687osq3onRHCcg7OOFMLIimQ2nEinG0NP0YftrrT2qzAWRhz1IOaYrEWf6mgvfq3M_qlWoSfSjImZEeLwPudQAw_1pCyWvlkYSieIayTYrwTTfnEjhf03Sv0MazjWOwpVkvOZSNJXSiypWwMKUXon5ehRG0SVK8TLCNnL008D_zJqwDVFkh6AX9f_a_gb-oRouQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2473376704</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Approximations to the Voice of a Cochlear Implant: Explorations With Single-Sided Deaf Listeners</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Dorman, Michael F. ; Natale, Sarah Cook ; Baxter, Leslie ; Zeitler, Daniel M. ; Carlson, Matthew L. ; Lorens, Artur ; Skarzynski, Henryk ; Peters, Jeroen P. M. ; Torres, Jennifer H. ; Noble, Jack H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dorman, Michael F. ; Natale, Sarah Cook ; Baxter, Leslie ; Zeitler, Daniel M. ; Carlson, Matthew L. ; Lorens, Artur ; Skarzynski, Henryk ; Peters, Jeroen P. M. ; Torres, Jennifer H. ; Noble, Jack H.</creatorcontrib><description>Fourteen single-sided deaf listeners fit with an MED-EL cochlear implant (CI) judged the similarity of clean signals presented to their CI and modified signals presented to their normal-hearing ear. The signals to the normal-hearing ear were created by (a) filtering, (b) spectral smearing, (c) changing overall fundamental frequency (F0), (d) F0 contour flattening, (e) changing formant frequencies, (f) altering resonances and ring times to create a metallic sound quality, (g) using a noise vocoder, or (h) using a sine vocoder. The operations could be used singly or in any combination. On a scale of 1 to 10 where 10 was a complete match to the sound of the CI, the mean match score was 8.8. Over half of the matches were 9.0 or higher. The most common alterations to a clean signal were band-pass or low-pass filtering, spectral peak smearing, and F0 contour flattening. On average, 3.4 operations were used to create a match. Upshifts in formant frequencies were implemented most often for electrode insertion angles less than approximately 500°. A relatively small set of operations can produce signals that approximate the sound of the MED-EL CI. There are large individual differences in the combination of operations needed. The sound files in Supplemental Material approximate the sound of the MED-EL CI for patients fit with 28-mm electrode arrays.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2331-2165</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2331-2165</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/2331216520920079</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32339072</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Cochlear Implantation ; Cochlear Implants ; Deafness ; Deafness - diagnosis ; Humans ; Original ; Speech Perception</subject><ispartof>Trends in hearing, 2020, Vol.24, p.2331216520920079-2331216520920079</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020 2020 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-b2ebf17c88500883b1f373de394a9ba3905fdb55c33edbdb45071e04d305dc8b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-b2ebf17c88500883b1f373de394a9ba3905fdb55c33edbdb45071e04d305dc8b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5506-5483 ; 0000-0001-9560-3231 ; 0000-0003-3189-9103</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7225791/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7225791/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,4024,21966,27853,27923,27924,27925,44945,45333,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32339072$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dorman, Michael F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Natale, Sarah Cook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baxter, Leslie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeitler, Daniel M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlson, Matthew L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lorens, Artur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skarzynski, Henryk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peters, Jeroen P. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres, Jennifer H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noble, Jack H.</creatorcontrib><title>Approximations to the Voice of a Cochlear Implant: Explorations With Single-Sided Deaf Listeners</title><title>Trends in hearing</title><addtitle>Trends Hear</addtitle><description>Fourteen single-sided deaf listeners fit with an MED-EL cochlear implant (CI) judged the similarity of clean signals presented to their CI and modified signals presented to their normal-hearing ear. The signals to the normal-hearing ear were created by (a) filtering, (b) spectral smearing, (c) changing overall fundamental frequency (F0), (d) F0 contour flattening, (e) changing formant frequencies, (f) altering resonances and ring times to create a metallic sound quality, (g) using a noise vocoder, or (h) using a sine vocoder. The operations could be used singly or in any combination. On a scale of 1 to 10 where 10 was a complete match to the sound of the CI, the mean match score was 8.8. Over half of the matches were 9.0 or higher. The most common alterations to a clean signal were band-pass or low-pass filtering, spectral peak smearing, and F0 contour flattening. On average, 3.4 operations were used to create a match. Upshifts in formant frequencies were implemented most often for electrode insertion angles less than approximately 500°. A relatively small set of operations can produce signals that approximate the sound of the MED-EL CI. There are large individual differences in the combination of operations needed. The sound files in Supplemental Material approximate the sound of the MED-EL CI for patients fit with 28-mm electrode arrays.</description><subject>Cochlear Implantation</subject><subject>Cochlear Implants</subject><subject>Deafness</subject><subject>Deafness - diagnosis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Speech Perception</subject><issn>2331-2165</issn><issn>2331-2165</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtP3DAUhS1UBAjYd4UsddNNwI84TlhUQgMFpJG6oI-l68fNjFEmTm1PRf99PZoppUhd2br3u8f3-CD0lpJzSqW8YJxTRhvBSMcIkd0eOtqUqk3tzYv7ITpN6ZEQQpkQsmEH6JCXZkckO0Lfr6Yphie_0tmHMeEccF4C_hq8BRx6rPEs2OUAOuL71TToMV_im6dpCHE38M3nJX7w42KA6sE7cPgadI_nPmUYIaYTtN_rIcHp7jxGXz7efJ7dVfNPt_ezq3ll64blyjAwPZW2bQUhbcsN7bnkDnhX687osq3onRHCcg7OOFMLIimQ2nEinG0NP0YftrrT2qzAWRhz1IOaYrEWf6mgvfq3M_qlWoSfSjImZEeLwPudQAw_1pCyWvlkYSieIayTYrwTTfnEjhf03Sv0MazjWOwpVkvOZSNJXSiypWwMKUXon5ehRG0SVK8TLCNnL008D_zJqwDVFkh6AX9f_a_gb-oRouQ</recordid><startdate>2020</startdate><enddate>2020</enddate><creator>Dorman, Michael F.</creator><creator>Natale, Sarah Cook</creator><creator>Baxter, Leslie</creator><creator>Zeitler, Daniel M.</creator><creator>Carlson, Matthew L.</creator><creator>Lorens, Artur</creator><creator>Skarzynski, Henryk</creator><creator>Peters, Jeroen P. M.</creator><creator>Torres, Jennifer H.</creator><creator>Noble, Jack H.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5506-5483</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9560-3231</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3189-9103</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2020</creationdate><title>Approximations to the Voice of a Cochlear Implant: Explorations With Single-Sided Deaf Listeners</title><author>Dorman, Michael F. ; Natale, Sarah Cook ; Baxter, Leslie ; Zeitler, Daniel M. ; Carlson, Matthew L. ; Lorens, Artur ; Skarzynski, Henryk ; Peters, Jeroen P. M. ; Torres, Jennifer H. ; Noble, Jack H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-b2ebf17c88500883b1f373de394a9ba3905fdb55c33edbdb45071e04d305dc8b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Cochlear Implantation</topic><topic>Cochlear Implants</topic><topic>Deafness</topic><topic>Deafness - diagnosis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Speech Perception</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dorman, Michael F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Natale, Sarah Cook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baxter, Leslie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeitler, Daniel M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlson, Matthew L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lorens, Artur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skarzynski, Henryk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peters, Jeroen P. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres, Jennifer H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noble, Jack H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Trends in hearing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dorman, Michael F.</au><au>Natale, Sarah Cook</au><au>Baxter, Leslie</au><au>Zeitler, Daniel M.</au><au>Carlson, Matthew L.</au><au>Lorens, Artur</au><au>Skarzynski, Henryk</au><au>Peters, Jeroen P. M.</au><au>Torres, Jennifer H.</au><au>Noble, Jack H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Approximations to the Voice of a Cochlear Implant: Explorations With Single-Sided Deaf Listeners</atitle><jtitle>Trends in hearing</jtitle><addtitle>Trends Hear</addtitle><date>2020</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>24</volume><spage>2331216520920079</spage><epage>2331216520920079</epage><pages>2331216520920079-2331216520920079</pages><issn>2331-2165</issn><eissn>2331-2165</eissn><abstract>Fourteen single-sided deaf listeners fit with an MED-EL cochlear implant (CI) judged the similarity of clean signals presented to their CI and modified signals presented to their normal-hearing ear. The signals to the normal-hearing ear were created by (a) filtering, (b) spectral smearing, (c) changing overall fundamental frequency (F0), (d) F0 contour flattening, (e) changing formant frequencies, (f) altering resonances and ring times to create a metallic sound quality, (g) using a noise vocoder, or (h) using a sine vocoder. The operations could be used singly or in any combination. On a scale of 1 to 10 where 10 was a complete match to the sound of the CI, the mean match score was 8.8. Over half of the matches were 9.0 or higher. The most common alterations to a clean signal were band-pass or low-pass filtering, spectral peak smearing, and F0 contour flattening. On average, 3.4 operations were used to create a match. Upshifts in formant frequencies were implemented most often for electrode insertion angles less than approximately 500°. A relatively small set of operations can produce signals that approximate the sound of the MED-EL CI. There are large individual differences in the combination of operations needed. The sound files in Supplemental Material approximate the sound of the MED-EL CI for patients fit with 28-mm electrode arrays.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>32339072</pmid><doi>10.1177/2331216520920079</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5506-5483</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9560-3231</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3189-9103</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2331-2165 |
ispartof | Trends in hearing, 2020, Vol.24, p.2331216520920079-2331216520920079 |
issn | 2331-2165 2331-2165 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7225791 |
source | MEDLINE; Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024; PubMed Central |
subjects | Cochlear Implantation Cochlear Implants Deafness Deafness - diagnosis Humans Original Speech Perception |
title | Approximations to the Voice of a Cochlear Implant: Explorations With Single-Sided Deaf Listeners |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T22%3A33%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Approximations%20to%20the%20Voice%20of%20a%20Cochlear%20Implant:%20Explorations%20With%20Single-Sided%20Deaf%20Listeners&rft.jtitle=Trends%20in%20hearing&rft.au=Dorman,%20Michael%20F.&rft.date=2020&rft.volume=24&rft.spage=2331216520920079&rft.epage=2331216520920079&rft.pages=2331216520920079-2331216520920079&rft.issn=2331-2165&rft.eissn=2331-2165&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/2331216520920079&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2395600193%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2473376704&rft_id=info:pmid/32339072&rft_sage_id=10.1177_2331216520920079&rfr_iscdi=true |