Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for the treatment of size-independent BPH: A single-center experience of 600 cases

Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is an endourologic minimal invasive intervention of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). The interest on HoLEP is increasing in the literature. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the learning curve and our preliminary results. A retrospective...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Turkish journal of urology 2020-05, Vol.46 (3), p.219-225
Hauptverfasser: Yalçın, Serdar, Yılmaz, Sercan, Gazel, Eymen, Kaya, Engin, Aydoğan, Tahsin Batuhan, Aybal, Halil Çağrı, Tunç, Lütfi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 225
container_issue 3
container_start_page 219
container_title Turkish journal of urology
container_volume 46
creator Yalçın, Serdar
Yılmaz, Sercan
Gazel, Eymen
Kaya, Engin
Aydoğan, Tahsin Batuhan
Aybal, Halil Çağrı
Tunç, Lütfi
description Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is an endourologic minimal invasive intervention of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). The interest on HoLEP is increasing in the literature. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the learning curve and our preliminary results. A retrospective analysis on 600 patients with BPH who underwent HoLEP between July 2015 and April 2019 was performed. Perioperative measures including enucleation efficiency (EE), morcellation efficiency (ME), and percentage of resected tissue weight (PRW) were recorded. Hospitalization time (HT) and catheterization time (CT) were measured. Functional outcomes, Clavien-Dindo classification complications, and continence status were assessed at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up. The mean age, prostate size, and prostate-specific antigen levels of the patients were 64.54 years, 91 g, and 4.54 ng/mL, respectively. There were 38.3% of patients with ≥100 g prostate size. The measured EE, ME, and PRW were 1.12 g/min, 4 g/min, and 72%, respectively. The mean HT and CT were 24.53 h and 21.50 h, respectively. Functional outcomes showed significant improvement at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were comparable with the literature. The most common perioperative complication was superficial bladder mucosal injury (n=8, 1.33%). Only one patient had persistent stress urinary incontinence at 6-month follow-up. As mentioned in the literature, HoLEP indications are independent from prostate size. Our results showed similarity with the literature on functional outcomes, complication rates, and continence status. With its superior results, our HoLEP series from Turkey supports that HoLEP will replace transurethral resection of the prostate as the known current gold standard.
doi_str_mv 10.5152/tud.2020.19235
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7219966</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2354736823</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-18aac1a29f8726868fe487d15cbde6216a3e19e7429c6b4fa3940ed1f05d5dcc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1vFSEUxYnR2KZ269JM0o2befI94MKkNtVn0kQX7ZrwmDstZgamwBht-seX6VfUDZDDj8O99yD0luCNIIJ-KEu_oZjiDdGUiRdonxKuW4ZF9_LpXPU9dJiz32HOO8mEwq_RHqNYMKzFPrrdxnHyy9SMNkNqICxuBFt8DE0cmnIFzZxiLrZAM8R0L5RUgQlCWYnsb6D1oYcZ6lK1zz-2H5vjqofLEVpXpdX29wzJQ3CwvpEYN65-l9-gV4MdMxw-7gfo4svp-cm2Pfv-9dvJ8VnrOFGlJcpaRyzVg-qoVFINwFXXE-F2PUhKpGVANHScaid3fLBMcww9GbDoRe8cO0CfHnznZTdBvxaV7Gjm5Ceb_phovfn3Jvgrcxl_mY4SraWsBu8fDVK8XiAXM_nsYBxtgLhkU6fMOyYVZRU9-g_9GZcUanuGCq4UEZqs1OaBcnW6OcHwXAzBZs3W1GzNmq25z7Y-ePd3C8_4U5LsDp8toSg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2548815913</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for the treatment of size-independent BPH: A single-center experience of 600 cases</title><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Yalçın, Serdar ; Yılmaz, Sercan ; Gazel, Eymen ; Kaya, Engin ; Aydoğan, Tahsin Batuhan ; Aybal, Halil Çağrı ; Tunç, Lütfi</creator><creatorcontrib>Yalçın, Serdar ; Yılmaz, Sercan ; Gazel, Eymen ; Kaya, Engin ; Aydoğan, Tahsin Batuhan ; Aybal, Halil Çağrı ; Tunç, Lütfi ; Department of Urology, Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey ; Clinic of Urology, Yurtaslan Oncology Hospital, Ankara, Turkey ; Clinic of Urology, Acibadem Ankara Hospital, Ankara, Turkey ; Department of Urology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy ; Department of Urology, Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey</creatorcontrib><description>Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is an endourologic minimal invasive intervention of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). The interest on HoLEP is increasing in the literature. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the learning curve and our preliminary results. A retrospective analysis on 600 patients with BPH who underwent HoLEP between July 2015 and April 2019 was performed. Perioperative measures including enucleation efficiency (EE), morcellation efficiency (ME), and percentage of resected tissue weight (PRW) were recorded. Hospitalization time (HT) and catheterization time (CT) were measured. Functional outcomes, Clavien-Dindo classification complications, and continence status were assessed at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up. The mean age, prostate size, and prostate-specific antigen levels of the patients were 64.54 years, 91 g, and 4.54 ng/mL, respectively. There were 38.3% of patients with ≥100 g prostate size. The measured EE, ME, and PRW were 1.12 g/min, 4 g/min, and 72%, respectively. The mean HT and CT were 24.53 h and 21.50 h, respectively. Functional outcomes showed significant improvement at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were comparable with the literature. The most common perioperative complication was superficial bladder mucosal injury (n=8, 1.33%). Only one patient had persistent stress urinary incontinence at 6-month follow-up. As mentioned in the literature, HoLEP indications are independent from prostate size. Our results showed similarity with the literature on functional outcomes, complication rates, and continence status. With its superior results, our HoLEP series from Turkey supports that HoLEP will replace transurethral resection of the prostate as the known current gold standard.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2149-3235</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2149-3057</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2980-1478</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5152/tud.2020.19235</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32053095</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Turkey: Aves Yayincilik Ltd. STI</publisher><subject>Endourology ; Prostate ; Urology</subject><ispartof>Turkish journal of urology, 2020-05, Vol.46 (3), p.219-225</ispartof><rights>2020. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the associated terms available at https://turkishjournalofurology.com/en/copyright-1011</rights><rights>Copyright 2020 by Turkish Association of Urology 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-18aac1a29f8726868fe487d15cbde6216a3e19e7429c6b4fa3940ed1f05d5dcc3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-6483-9249 ; 0000-0002-2000-7790 ; 0000-0001-9123-6139 ; 0000-0003-4586-7591 ; 0000-0002-7338-3909 ; 0000-0002-5272-572X ; 0000-0001-6820-6708</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2548815913/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2548815913?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,21367,27901,27902,33721,43781,53766,53768,74273</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32053095$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yalçın, Serdar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yılmaz, Sercan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gazel, Eymen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaya, Engin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aydoğan, Tahsin Batuhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aybal, Halil Çağrı</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tunç, Lütfi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Urology, Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clinic of Urology, Yurtaslan Oncology Hospital, Ankara, Turkey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clinic of Urology, Acibadem Ankara Hospital, Ankara, Turkey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Urology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Urology, Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey</creatorcontrib><title>Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for the treatment of size-independent BPH: A single-center experience of 600 cases</title><title>Turkish journal of urology</title><addtitle>Turk J Urol</addtitle><description>Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is an endourologic minimal invasive intervention of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). The interest on HoLEP is increasing in the literature. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the learning curve and our preliminary results. A retrospective analysis on 600 patients with BPH who underwent HoLEP between July 2015 and April 2019 was performed. Perioperative measures including enucleation efficiency (EE), morcellation efficiency (ME), and percentage of resected tissue weight (PRW) were recorded. Hospitalization time (HT) and catheterization time (CT) were measured. Functional outcomes, Clavien-Dindo classification complications, and continence status were assessed at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up. The mean age, prostate size, and prostate-specific antigen levels of the patients were 64.54 years, 91 g, and 4.54 ng/mL, respectively. There were 38.3% of patients with ≥100 g prostate size. The measured EE, ME, and PRW were 1.12 g/min, 4 g/min, and 72%, respectively. The mean HT and CT were 24.53 h and 21.50 h, respectively. Functional outcomes showed significant improvement at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were comparable with the literature. The most common perioperative complication was superficial bladder mucosal injury (n=8, 1.33%). Only one patient had persistent stress urinary incontinence at 6-month follow-up. As mentioned in the literature, HoLEP indications are independent from prostate size. Our results showed similarity with the literature on functional outcomes, complication rates, and continence status. With its superior results, our HoLEP series from Turkey supports that HoLEP will replace transurethral resection of the prostate as the known current gold standard.</description><subject>Endourology</subject><subject>Prostate</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>2149-3235</issn><issn>2149-3057</issn><issn>2980-1478</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc1vFSEUxYnR2KZ269JM0o2befI94MKkNtVn0kQX7ZrwmDstZgamwBht-seX6VfUDZDDj8O99yD0luCNIIJ-KEu_oZjiDdGUiRdonxKuW4ZF9_LpXPU9dJiz32HOO8mEwq_RHqNYMKzFPrrdxnHyy9SMNkNqICxuBFt8DE0cmnIFzZxiLrZAM8R0L5RUgQlCWYnsb6D1oYcZ6lK1zz-2H5vjqofLEVpXpdX29wzJQ3CwvpEYN65-l9-gV4MdMxw-7gfo4svp-cm2Pfv-9dvJ8VnrOFGlJcpaRyzVg-qoVFINwFXXE-F2PUhKpGVANHScaid3fLBMcww9GbDoRe8cO0CfHnznZTdBvxaV7Gjm5Ceb_phovfn3Jvgrcxl_mY4SraWsBu8fDVK8XiAXM_nsYBxtgLhkU6fMOyYVZRU9-g_9GZcUanuGCq4UEZqs1OaBcnW6OcHwXAzBZs3W1GzNmq25z7Y-ePd3C8_4U5LsDp8toSg</recordid><startdate>20200501</startdate><enddate>20200501</enddate><creator>Yalçın, Serdar</creator><creator>Yılmaz, Sercan</creator><creator>Gazel, Eymen</creator><creator>Kaya, Engin</creator><creator>Aydoğan, Tahsin Batuhan</creator><creator>Aybal, Halil Çağrı</creator><creator>Tunç, Lütfi</creator><general>Aves Yayincilik Ltd. STI</general><general>Turkish Association of Urology</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>EDSIH</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6483-9249</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2000-7790</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9123-6139</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4586-7591</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7338-3909</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5272-572X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6820-6708</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200501</creationdate><title>Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for the treatment of size-independent BPH: A single-center experience of 600 cases</title><author>Yalçın, Serdar ; Yılmaz, Sercan ; Gazel, Eymen ; Kaya, Engin ; Aydoğan, Tahsin Batuhan ; Aybal, Halil Çağrı ; Tunç, Lütfi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-18aac1a29f8726868fe487d15cbde6216a3e19e7429c6b4fa3940ed1f05d5dcc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Endourology</topic><topic>Prostate</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yalçın, Serdar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yılmaz, Sercan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gazel, Eymen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaya, Engin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aydoğan, Tahsin Batuhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aybal, Halil Çağrı</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tunç, Lütfi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Urology, Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clinic of Urology, Yurtaslan Oncology Hospital, Ankara, Turkey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clinic of Urology, Acibadem Ankara Hospital, Ankara, Turkey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Urology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Urology, Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Turkey Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Turkish journal of urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yalçın, Serdar</au><au>Yılmaz, Sercan</au><au>Gazel, Eymen</au><au>Kaya, Engin</au><au>Aydoğan, Tahsin Batuhan</au><au>Aybal, Halil Çağrı</au><au>Tunç, Lütfi</au><aucorp>Department of Urology, Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey</aucorp><aucorp>Clinic of Urology, Yurtaslan Oncology Hospital, Ankara, Turkey</aucorp><aucorp>Clinic of Urology, Acibadem Ankara Hospital, Ankara, Turkey</aucorp><aucorp>Department of Urology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy</aucorp><aucorp>Department of Urology, Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for the treatment of size-independent BPH: A single-center experience of 600 cases</atitle><jtitle>Turkish journal of urology</jtitle><addtitle>Turk J Urol</addtitle><date>2020-05-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>219</spage><epage>225</epage><pages>219-225</pages><issn>2149-3235</issn><eissn>2149-3057</eissn><eissn>2980-1478</eissn><abstract>Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is an endourologic minimal invasive intervention of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). The interest on HoLEP is increasing in the literature. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the learning curve and our preliminary results. A retrospective analysis on 600 patients with BPH who underwent HoLEP between July 2015 and April 2019 was performed. Perioperative measures including enucleation efficiency (EE), morcellation efficiency (ME), and percentage of resected tissue weight (PRW) were recorded. Hospitalization time (HT) and catheterization time (CT) were measured. Functional outcomes, Clavien-Dindo classification complications, and continence status were assessed at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up. The mean age, prostate size, and prostate-specific antigen levels of the patients were 64.54 years, 91 g, and 4.54 ng/mL, respectively. There were 38.3% of patients with ≥100 g prostate size. The measured EE, ME, and PRW were 1.12 g/min, 4 g/min, and 72%, respectively. The mean HT and CT were 24.53 h and 21.50 h, respectively. Functional outcomes showed significant improvement at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were comparable with the literature. The most common perioperative complication was superficial bladder mucosal injury (n=8, 1.33%). Only one patient had persistent stress urinary incontinence at 6-month follow-up. As mentioned in the literature, HoLEP indications are independent from prostate size. Our results showed similarity with the literature on functional outcomes, complication rates, and continence status. With its superior results, our HoLEP series from Turkey supports that HoLEP will replace transurethral resection of the prostate as the known current gold standard.</abstract><cop>Turkey</cop><pub>Aves Yayincilik Ltd. STI</pub><pmid>32053095</pmid><doi>10.5152/tud.2020.19235</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6483-9249</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2000-7790</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9123-6139</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4586-7591</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7338-3909</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5272-572X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6820-6708</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2149-3235
ispartof Turkish journal of urology, 2020-05, Vol.46 (3), p.219-225
issn 2149-3235
2149-3057
2980-1478
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7219966
source PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; ProQuest Central
subjects Endourology
Prostate
Urology
title Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for the treatment of size-independent BPH: A single-center experience of 600 cases
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T13%3A16%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Holmium%20laser%20enucleation%20of%20the%20prostate%20for%20the%20treatment%20of%20size-independent%20BPH:%20A%20single-center%20experience%20of%20600%20cases&rft.jtitle=Turkish%20journal%20of%20urology&rft.au=Yal%C3%A7%C4%B1n,%20Serdar&rft.aucorp=Department%20of%20Urology,%20Gulhane%20Training%20and%20Research%20Hospital,%20Ankara,%20Turkey&rft.date=2020-05-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=219&rft.epage=225&rft.pages=219-225&rft.issn=2149-3235&rft.eissn=2149-3057&rft_id=info:doi/10.5152/tud.2020.19235&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2354736823%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2548815913&rft_id=info:pmid/32053095&rfr_iscdi=true