Sample size and power calculations for open cohort longitudinal cluster randomized trials
When calculating sample size or power for stepped wedge or other types of longitudinal cluster randomized trials, it is critical that the planned sampling structure be accurately specified. One common assumption is that participants will provide measurements in each trial period, that is, a closed c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Statistics in medicine 2020-06, Vol.39 (13), p.1871-1883 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1883 |
---|---|
container_issue | 13 |
container_start_page | 1871 |
container_title | Statistics in medicine |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Kasza, Jessica Hooper, Richard Copas, Andrew Forbes, Andrew B. |
description | When calculating sample size or power for stepped wedge or other types of longitudinal cluster randomized trials, it is critical that the planned sampling structure be accurately specified. One common assumption is that participants will provide measurements in each trial period, that is, a closed cohort, and another is that each participant provides only one measurement during the course of the trial. However some studies have an “open cohort” sampling structure, where participants may provide measurements in variable numbers of periods. To date, sample size calculations for longitudinal cluster randomized trials have not accommodated open cohorts. Feldman and McKinlay (1994) provided some guidance, stating that the participant‐level autocorrelation could be varied to account for the degree of overlap in different periods of the study, but did not indicate precisely how to do so. We present sample size and power formulas that allow for open cohorts and discuss the impact of the degree of “openness” on sample size and power. We consider designs where the number of participants in each cluster will be maintained throughout the trial, but individual participants may provide differing numbers of measurements. Our results are a unification of closed cohort and repeated cross‐sectional sample results of Hooper et al (2016), and indicate precisely how participant autocorrelation of Feldman and McKinlay should be varied to account for an open cohort sampling structure. We discuss different types of open cohort sampling schemes and how open cohort sampling structure impacts on power in the presence of decaying within‐cluster correlations and autoregressive participant‐level errors. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/sim.8519 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7217159</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2371860538</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4389-820b4142bacee5c5305467f14986d7e2d8c9ff57c22302ce5ef1702ecefe59e43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1rFTEUhoNY7LUK_gIJuOlm6kkymSQbQYofhUoX1YWrkJs506ZkJmMyY2l_vbm21g9wdRbneR8O5yXkBYMjBsBflzAeacnMI7JhYFQDXOrHZANcqaZTTO6Tp6VcATAmuXpC9gVnQnRab8jXczfOEWkJt0jd1NM5XWOm3kW_RreENBU6pEzTjBP16TLlhcY0XYRl7cPkIvVxLUtN5BpOY7X0dMnBxfKM7A114PP7eUC-vH_3-fhjc3r24eT47WnjW6FNozlsW9byrfOI0ksBsu3UwFqju14h77U3wyCV51wA9yhxYAo4ehxQGmzFAXlz553X7Yi9x2nJLto5h9HlG5tcsH9vpnBpL9J3qzirrzFVcHgvyOnbimWxYygeY3QTprVYLhTTHUihK_rqH_Qqrbm-YUcZYYwCgN9Cn1MpGYeHYxjYXV-29mV3fVX05Z_HP4C_CqpAcwdch4g3_xXZ85NPP4U_ADKOoNI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2393997000</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sample size and power calculations for open cohort longitudinal cluster randomized trials</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Kasza, Jessica ; Hooper, Richard ; Copas, Andrew ; Forbes, Andrew B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kasza, Jessica ; Hooper, Richard ; Copas, Andrew ; Forbes, Andrew B.</creatorcontrib><description>When calculating sample size or power for stepped wedge or other types of longitudinal cluster randomized trials, it is critical that the planned sampling structure be accurately specified. One common assumption is that participants will provide measurements in each trial period, that is, a closed cohort, and another is that each participant provides only one measurement during the course of the trial. However some studies have an “open cohort” sampling structure, where participants may provide measurements in variable numbers of periods. To date, sample size calculations for longitudinal cluster randomized trials have not accommodated open cohorts. Feldman and McKinlay (1994) provided some guidance, stating that the participant‐level autocorrelation could be varied to account for the degree of overlap in different periods of the study, but did not indicate precisely how to do so. We present sample size and power formulas that allow for open cohorts and discuss the impact of the degree of “openness” on sample size and power. We consider designs where the number of participants in each cluster will be maintained throughout the trial, but individual participants may provide differing numbers of measurements. Our results are a unification of closed cohort and repeated cross‐sectional sample results of Hooper et al (2016), and indicate precisely how participant autocorrelation of Feldman and McKinlay should be varied to account for an open cohort sampling structure. We discuss different types of open cohort sampling schemes and how open cohort sampling structure impacts on power in the presence of decaying within‐cluster correlations and autoregressive participant‐level errors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-6715</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0258</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/sim.8519</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32133688</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>cluster crossover trial ; intra cluster correlation ; mixed effects models ; Sample size ; stepped wedge</subject><ispartof>Statistics in medicine, 2020-06, Vol.39 (13), p.1871-1883</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2020 The Authors. Statistics in Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2020. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4389-820b4142bacee5c5305467f14986d7e2d8c9ff57c22302ce5ef1702ecefe59e43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4389-820b4142bacee5c5305467f14986d7e2d8c9ff57c22302ce5ef1702ecefe59e43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8940-0136 ; 0000-0002-1063-0917</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fsim.8519$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fsim.8519$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32133688$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kasza, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hooper, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Copas, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forbes, Andrew B.</creatorcontrib><title>Sample size and power calculations for open cohort longitudinal cluster randomized trials</title><title>Statistics in medicine</title><addtitle>Stat Med</addtitle><description>When calculating sample size or power for stepped wedge or other types of longitudinal cluster randomized trials, it is critical that the planned sampling structure be accurately specified. One common assumption is that participants will provide measurements in each trial period, that is, a closed cohort, and another is that each participant provides only one measurement during the course of the trial. However some studies have an “open cohort” sampling structure, where participants may provide measurements in variable numbers of periods. To date, sample size calculations for longitudinal cluster randomized trials have not accommodated open cohorts. Feldman and McKinlay (1994) provided some guidance, stating that the participant‐level autocorrelation could be varied to account for the degree of overlap in different periods of the study, but did not indicate precisely how to do so. We present sample size and power formulas that allow for open cohorts and discuss the impact of the degree of “openness” on sample size and power. We consider designs where the number of participants in each cluster will be maintained throughout the trial, but individual participants may provide differing numbers of measurements. Our results are a unification of closed cohort and repeated cross‐sectional sample results of Hooper et al (2016), and indicate precisely how participant autocorrelation of Feldman and McKinlay should be varied to account for an open cohort sampling structure. We discuss different types of open cohort sampling schemes and how open cohort sampling structure impacts on power in the presence of decaying within‐cluster correlations and autoregressive participant‐level errors.</description><subject>cluster crossover trial</subject><subject>intra cluster correlation</subject><subject>mixed effects models</subject><subject>Sample size</subject><subject>stepped wedge</subject><issn>0277-6715</issn><issn>1097-0258</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1rFTEUhoNY7LUK_gIJuOlm6kkymSQbQYofhUoX1YWrkJs506ZkJmMyY2l_vbm21g9wdRbneR8O5yXkBYMjBsBflzAeacnMI7JhYFQDXOrHZANcqaZTTO6Tp6VcATAmuXpC9gVnQnRab8jXczfOEWkJt0jd1NM5XWOm3kW_RreENBU6pEzTjBP16TLlhcY0XYRl7cPkIvVxLUtN5BpOY7X0dMnBxfKM7A114PP7eUC-vH_3-fhjc3r24eT47WnjW6FNozlsW9byrfOI0ksBsu3UwFqju14h77U3wyCV51wA9yhxYAo4ehxQGmzFAXlz553X7Yi9x2nJLto5h9HlG5tcsH9vpnBpL9J3qzirrzFVcHgvyOnbimWxYygeY3QTprVYLhTTHUihK_rqH_Qqrbm-YUcZYYwCgN9Cn1MpGYeHYxjYXV-29mV3fVX05Z_HP4C_CqpAcwdch4g3_xXZ85NPP4U_ADKOoNI</recordid><startdate>20200615</startdate><enddate>20200615</enddate><creator>Kasza, Jessica</creator><creator>Hooper, Richard</creator><creator>Copas, Andrew</creator><creator>Forbes, Andrew B.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8940-0136</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1063-0917</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200615</creationdate><title>Sample size and power calculations for open cohort longitudinal cluster randomized trials</title><author>Kasza, Jessica ; Hooper, Richard ; Copas, Andrew ; Forbes, Andrew B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4389-820b4142bacee5c5305467f14986d7e2d8c9ff57c22302ce5ef1702ecefe59e43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>cluster crossover trial</topic><topic>intra cluster correlation</topic><topic>mixed effects models</topic><topic>Sample size</topic><topic>stepped wedge</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kasza, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hooper, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Copas, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forbes, Andrew B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Statistics in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kasza, Jessica</au><au>Hooper, Richard</au><au>Copas, Andrew</au><au>Forbes, Andrew B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sample size and power calculations for open cohort longitudinal cluster randomized trials</atitle><jtitle>Statistics in medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Stat Med</addtitle><date>2020-06-15</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>1871</spage><epage>1883</epage><pages>1871-1883</pages><issn>0277-6715</issn><eissn>1097-0258</eissn><abstract>When calculating sample size or power for stepped wedge or other types of longitudinal cluster randomized trials, it is critical that the planned sampling structure be accurately specified. One common assumption is that participants will provide measurements in each trial period, that is, a closed cohort, and another is that each participant provides only one measurement during the course of the trial. However some studies have an “open cohort” sampling structure, where participants may provide measurements in variable numbers of periods. To date, sample size calculations for longitudinal cluster randomized trials have not accommodated open cohorts. Feldman and McKinlay (1994) provided some guidance, stating that the participant‐level autocorrelation could be varied to account for the degree of overlap in different periods of the study, but did not indicate precisely how to do so. We present sample size and power formulas that allow for open cohorts and discuss the impact of the degree of “openness” on sample size and power. We consider designs where the number of participants in each cluster will be maintained throughout the trial, but individual participants may provide differing numbers of measurements. Our results are a unification of closed cohort and repeated cross‐sectional sample results of Hooper et al (2016), and indicate precisely how participant autocorrelation of Feldman and McKinlay should be varied to account for an open cohort sampling structure. We discuss different types of open cohort sampling schemes and how open cohort sampling structure impacts on power in the presence of decaying within‐cluster correlations and autoregressive participant‐level errors.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>32133688</pmid><doi>10.1002/sim.8519</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8940-0136</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1063-0917</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0277-6715 |
ispartof | Statistics in medicine, 2020-06, Vol.39 (13), p.1871-1883 |
issn | 0277-6715 1097-0258 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7217159 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | cluster crossover trial intra cluster correlation mixed effects models Sample size stepped wedge |
title | Sample size and power calculations for open cohort longitudinal cluster randomized trials |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T06%3A06%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sample%20size%20and%20power%20calculations%20for%20open%20cohort%20longitudinal%20cluster%20randomized%20trials&rft.jtitle=Statistics%20in%20medicine&rft.au=Kasza,%20Jessica&rft.date=2020-06-15&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=1871&rft.epage=1883&rft.pages=1871-1883&rft.issn=0277-6715&rft.eissn=1097-0258&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/sim.8519&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2371860538%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2393997000&rft_id=info:pmid/32133688&rfr_iscdi=true |