Progress and issues in second-order analysis of hippocampal replay

Patterns of neural activity that occur spontaneously during sharp-wave ripple (SWR) events in the hippocampus are thought to play an important role in memory formation, consolidation and retrieval. Typical studies examining the content of SWRs seek to determine whether the identity and/or temporal o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences 2020-05, Vol.375 (1799), p.20190238-20190238
Hauptverfasser: van der Meer, Matthijs A A, Kemere, Caleb, Diba, Kamran
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 20190238
container_issue 1799
container_start_page 20190238
container_title Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences
container_volume 375
creator van der Meer, Matthijs A A
Kemere, Caleb
Diba, Kamran
description Patterns of neural activity that occur spontaneously during sharp-wave ripple (SWR) events in the hippocampus are thought to play an important role in memory formation, consolidation and retrieval. Typical studies examining the content of SWRs seek to determine whether the identity and/or temporal order of cell firing is different from chance. Such 'first-order' analyses are focused on a single time point and template (map), and have been used to show, for instance, the existence of preplay. The major methodological challenge in first-order analyses is the construction and interpretation of different chance distributions. By contrast, 'second-order' analyses involve a comparison of SWR content between different time points, and/or between different templates. Typical second-order questions include tests of experience-dependence (replay) that compare SWR content before and after experience, and comparisons or replay between different arms of a maze. Such questions entail additional methodological challenges that can lead to biases in results and associated interpretations. We provide an inventory of analysis challenges for second-order questions about SWR content, and suggest ways of preventing, identifying and addressing possible analysis biases. Given evolving interest in understanding SWR content in more complex experimental scenarios and across different time scales, we expect these issues to become increasingly pervasive. This article is part of the Theo Murphy meeting issue 'Memory reactivation: replaying events past, present and future'.
doi_str_mv 10.1098/rstb.2019.0238
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7209917</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2386434764</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-39efe89ae78bc402e0f0a6efb14731f569fe529772045f90ac9dd8f8888916b93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkE1PwzAMhiMEYmNw5Yh65NKSr7bJBQkmvqRJcIBzlLbOFtQ1JemQ9u9JtTGBD_bB9uvXD0KXBGcES3Hjw1BlFBOZYcrEEZoSXpKUyhIfoymWBU0FZ8UEnYXwiTGWeclP0YRRykUp8BTdv3m39BBCorsmsSFsICS2SwLUrmtS5xvwsaXbbbAhcSZZ2b53tV73uk089K3enqMTo9sAF_s6Qx-PD-_z53Tx-vQyv1ukdc7kkDIJBoTUUIqq5pgCNlgXYKromBGTF9JAHo2XFPPcSKxr2TTCiBiSFJVkM3S70-031RqaGrrB61b13q613yqnrfrf6exKLd23iopSkjIKXO8FvPuKfw5qbUMNbas7cJugIsCCM17GNEPZbrT2LgQP5nCGYDWCVyN4NYJXI_i4cPXX3GH8lzT7AfmagLg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2386434764</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Progress and issues in second-order analysis of hippocampal replay</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>van der Meer, Matthijs A A ; Kemere, Caleb ; Diba, Kamran</creator><creatorcontrib>van der Meer, Matthijs A A ; Kemere, Caleb ; Diba, Kamran</creatorcontrib><description>Patterns of neural activity that occur spontaneously during sharp-wave ripple (SWR) events in the hippocampus are thought to play an important role in memory formation, consolidation and retrieval. Typical studies examining the content of SWRs seek to determine whether the identity and/or temporal order of cell firing is different from chance. Such 'first-order' analyses are focused on a single time point and template (map), and have been used to show, for instance, the existence of preplay. The major methodological challenge in first-order analyses is the construction and interpretation of different chance distributions. By contrast, 'second-order' analyses involve a comparison of SWR content between different time points, and/or between different templates. Typical second-order questions include tests of experience-dependence (replay) that compare SWR content before and after experience, and comparisons or replay between different arms of a maze. Such questions entail additional methodological challenges that can lead to biases in results and associated interpretations. We provide an inventory of analysis challenges for second-order questions about SWR content, and suggest ways of preventing, identifying and addressing possible analysis biases. Given evolving interest in understanding SWR content in more complex experimental scenarios and across different time scales, we expect these issues to become increasingly pervasive. This article is part of the Theo Murphy meeting issue 'Memory reactivation: replaying events past, present and future'.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-8436</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2970</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0238</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32248780</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The Royal Society</publisher><subject>Animals ; Hippocampus - physiology ; Humans ; Memory Consolidation - physiology ; Opinion Piece</subject><ispartof>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences, 2020-05, Vol.375 (1799), p.20190238-20190238</ispartof><rights>2020 The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-39efe89ae78bc402e0f0a6efb14731f569fe529772045f90ac9dd8f8888916b93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-39efe89ae78bc402e0f0a6efb14731f569fe529772045f90ac9dd8f8888916b93</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5128-4478 ; 0000-0002-2206-4473</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7209917/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7209917/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27915,27916,53782,53784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32248780$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>van der Meer, Matthijs A A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemere, Caleb</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diba, Kamran</creatorcontrib><title>Progress and issues in second-order analysis of hippocampal replay</title><title>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</title><addtitle>Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci</addtitle><description>Patterns of neural activity that occur spontaneously during sharp-wave ripple (SWR) events in the hippocampus are thought to play an important role in memory formation, consolidation and retrieval. Typical studies examining the content of SWRs seek to determine whether the identity and/or temporal order of cell firing is different from chance. Such 'first-order' analyses are focused on a single time point and template (map), and have been used to show, for instance, the existence of preplay. The major methodological challenge in first-order analyses is the construction and interpretation of different chance distributions. By contrast, 'second-order' analyses involve a comparison of SWR content between different time points, and/or between different templates. Typical second-order questions include tests of experience-dependence (replay) that compare SWR content before and after experience, and comparisons or replay between different arms of a maze. Such questions entail additional methodological challenges that can lead to biases in results and associated interpretations. We provide an inventory of analysis challenges for second-order questions about SWR content, and suggest ways of preventing, identifying and addressing possible analysis biases. Given evolving interest in understanding SWR content in more complex experimental scenarios and across different time scales, we expect these issues to become increasingly pervasive. This article is part of the Theo Murphy meeting issue 'Memory reactivation: replaying events past, present and future'.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Hippocampus - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Memory Consolidation - physiology</subject><subject>Opinion Piece</subject><issn>0962-8436</issn><issn>1471-2970</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkE1PwzAMhiMEYmNw5Yh65NKSr7bJBQkmvqRJcIBzlLbOFtQ1JemQ9u9JtTGBD_bB9uvXD0KXBGcES3Hjw1BlFBOZYcrEEZoSXpKUyhIfoymWBU0FZ8UEnYXwiTGWeclP0YRRykUp8BTdv3m39BBCorsmsSFsICS2SwLUrmtS5xvwsaXbbbAhcSZZ2b53tV73uk089K3enqMTo9sAF_s6Qx-PD-_z53Tx-vQyv1ukdc7kkDIJBoTUUIqq5pgCNlgXYKromBGTF9JAHo2XFPPcSKxr2TTCiBiSFJVkM3S70-031RqaGrrB61b13q613yqnrfrf6exKLd23iopSkjIKXO8FvPuKfw5qbUMNbas7cJugIsCCM17GNEPZbrT2LgQP5nCGYDWCVyN4NYJXI_i4cPXX3GH8lzT7AfmagLg</recordid><startdate>20200525</startdate><enddate>20200525</enddate><creator>van der Meer, Matthijs A A</creator><creator>Kemere, Caleb</creator><creator>Diba, Kamran</creator><general>The Royal Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5128-4478</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2206-4473</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200525</creationdate><title>Progress and issues in second-order analysis of hippocampal replay</title><author>van der Meer, Matthijs A A ; Kemere, Caleb ; Diba, Kamran</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-39efe89ae78bc402e0f0a6efb14731f569fe529772045f90ac9dd8f8888916b93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Hippocampus - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Memory Consolidation - physiology</topic><topic>Opinion Piece</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van der Meer, Matthijs A A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemere, Caleb</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diba, Kamran</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van der Meer, Matthijs A A</au><au>Kemere, Caleb</au><au>Diba, Kamran</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Progress and issues in second-order analysis of hippocampal replay</atitle><jtitle>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci</addtitle><date>2020-05-25</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>375</volume><issue>1799</issue><spage>20190238</spage><epage>20190238</epage><pages>20190238-20190238</pages><issn>0962-8436</issn><eissn>1471-2970</eissn><abstract>Patterns of neural activity that occur spontaneously during sharp-wave ripple (SWR) events in the hippocampus are thought to play an important role in memory formation, consolidation and retrieval. Typical studies examining the content of SWRs seek to determine whether the identity and/or temporal order of cell firing is different from chance. Such 'first-order' analyses are focused on a single time point and template (map), and have been used to show, for instance, the existence of preplay. The major methodological challenge in first-order analyses is the construction and interpretation of different chance distributions. By contrast, 'second-order' analyses involve a comparison of SWR content between different time points, and/or between different templates. Typical second-order questions include tests of experience-dependence (replay) that compare SWR content before and after experience, and comparisons or replay between different arms of a maze. Such questions entail additional methodological challenges that can lead to biases in results and associated interpretations. We provide an inventory of analysis challenges for second-order questions about SWR content, and suggest ways of preventing, identifying and addressing possible analysis biases. Given evolving interest in understanding SWR content in more complex experimental scenarios and across different time scales, we expect these issues to become increasingly pervasive. This article is part of the Theo Murphy meeting issue 'Memory reactivation: replaying events past, present and future'.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The Royal Society</pub><pmid>32248780</pmid><doi>10.1098/rstb.2019.0238</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5128-4478</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2206-4473</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0962-8436
ispartof Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences, 2020-05, Vol.375 (1799), p.20190238-20190238
issn 0962-8436
1471-2970
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7209917
source MEDLINE; PubMed Central; JSTOR
subjects Animals
Hippocampus - physiology
Humans
Memory Consolidation - physiology
Opinion Piece
title Progress and issues in second-order analysis of hippocampal replay
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T19%3A40%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Progress%20and%20issues%20in%20second-order%20analysis%20of%20hippocampal%20replay&rft.jtitle=Philosophical%20transactions%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society%20of%20London.%20Series%20B.%20Biological%20sciences&rft.au=van%20der%20Meer,%20Matthijs%20A%20A&rft.date=2020-05-25&rft.volume=375&rft.issue=1799&rft.spage=20190238&rft.epage=20190238&rft.pages=20190238-20190238&rft.issn=0962-8436&rft.eissn=1471-2970&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rstb.2019.0238&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2386434764%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2386434764&rft_id=info:pmid/32248780&rfr_iscdi=true