Progress and issues in second-order analysis of hippocampal replay
Patterns of neural activity that occur spontaneously during sharp-wave ripple (SWR) events in the hippocampus are thought to play an important role in memory formation, consolidation and retrieval. Typical studies examining the content of SWRs seek to determine whether the identity and/or temporal o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences 2020-05, Vol.375 (1799), p.20190238-20190238 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 20190238 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1799 |
container_start_page | 20190238 |
container_title | Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences |
container_volume | 375 |
creator | van der Meer, Matthijs A A Kemere, Caleb Diba, Kamran |
description | Patterns of neural activity that occur spontaneously during sharp-wave ripple (SWR) events in the hippocampus are thought to play an important role in memory formation, consolidation and retrieval. Typical studies examining the content of SWRs seek to determine whether the identity and/or temporal order of cell firing is different from chance. Such 'first-order' analyses are focused on a single time point and template (map), and have been used to show, for instance, the existence of preplay. The major methodological challenge in first-order analyses is the construction and interpretation of different chance distributions. By contrast, 'second-order' analyses involve a comparison of SWR content between different time points, and/or between different templates. Typical second-order questions include tests of experience-dependence (replay) that compare SWR content before and after experience, and comparisons or replay between different arms of a maze. Such questions entail additional methodological challenges that can lead to biases in results and associated interpretations. We provide an inventory of analysis challenges for second-order questions about SWR content, and suggest ways of preventing, identifying and addressing possible analysis biases. Given evolving interest in understanding SWR content in more complex experimental scenarios and across different time scales, we expect these issues to become increasingly pervasive. This article is part of the Theo Murphy meeting issue 'Memory reactivation: replaying events past, present and future'. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1098/rstb.2019.0238 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7209917</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2386434764</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-39efe89ae78bc402e0f0a6efb14731f569fe529772045f90ac9dd8f8888916b93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkE1PwzAMhiMEYmNw5Yh65NKSr7bJBQkmvqRJcIBzlLbOFtQ1JemQ9u9JtTGBD_bB9uvXD0KXBGcES3Hjw1BlFBOZYcrEEZoSXpKUyhIfoymWBU0FZ8UEnYXwiTGWeclP0YRRykUp8BTdv3m39BBCorsmsSFsICS2SwLUrmtS5xvwsaXbbbAhcSZZ2b53tV73uk089K3enqMTo9sAF_s6Qx-PD-_z53Tx-vQyv1ukdc7kkDIJBoTUUIqq5pgCNlgXYKromBGTF9JAHo2XFPPcSKxr2TTCiBiSFJVkM3S70-031RqaGrrB61b13q613yqnrfrf6exKLd23iopSkjIKXO8FvPuKfw5qbUMNbas7cJugIsCCM17GNEPZbrT2LgQP5nCGYDWCVyN4NYJXI_i4cPXX3GH8lzT7AfmagLg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2386434764</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Progress and issues in second-order analysis of hippocampal replay</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>van der Meer, Matthijs A A ; Kemere, Caleb ; Diba, Kamran</creator><creatorcontrib>van der Meer, Matthijs A A ; Kemere, Caleb ; Diba, Kamran</creatorcontrib><description>Patterns of neural activity that occur spontaneously during sharp-wave ripple (SWR) events in the hippocampus are thought to play an important role in memory formation, consolidation and retrieval. Typical studies examining the content of SWRs seek to determine whether the identity and/or temporal order of cell firing is different from chance. Such 'first-order' analyses are focused on a single time point and template (map), and have been used to show, for instance, the existence of preplay. The major methodological challenge in first-order analyses is the construction and interpretation of different chance distributions. By contrast, 'second-order' analyses involve a comparison of SWR content between different time points, and/or between different templates. Typical second-order questions include tests of experience-dependence (replay) that compare SWR content before and after experience, and comparisons or replay between different arms of a maze. Such questions entail additional methodological challenges that can lead to biases in results and associated interpretations. We provide an inventory of analysis challenges for second-order questions about SWR content, and suggest ways of preventing, identifying and addressing possible analysis biases. Given evolving interest in understanding SWR content in more complex experimental scenarios and across different time scales, we expect these issues to become increasingly pervasive. This article is part of the Theo Murphy meeting issue 'Memory reactivation: replaying events past, present and future'.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-8436</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2970</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0238</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32248780</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The Royal Society</publisher><subject>Animals ; Hippocampus - physiology ; Humans ; Memory Consolidation - physiology ; Opinion Piece</subject><ispartof>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences, 2020-05, Vol.375 (1799), p.20190238-20190238</ispartof><rights>2020 The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-39efe89ae78bc402e0f0a6efb14731f569fe529772045f90ac9dd8f8888916b93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-39efe89ae78bc402e0f0a6efb14731f569fe529772045f90ac9dd8f8888916b93</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5128-4478 ; 0000-0002-2206-4473</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7209917/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7209917/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27915,27916,53782,53784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32248780$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>van der Meer, Matthijs A A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemere, Caleb</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diba, Kamran</creatorcontrib><title>Progress and issues in second-order analysis of hippocampal replay</title><title>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</title><addtitle>Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci</addtitle><description>Patterns of neural activity that occur spontaneously during sharp-wave ripple (SWR) events in the hippocampus are thought to play an important role in memory formation, consolidation and retrieval. Typical studies examining the content of SWRs seek to determine whether the identity and/or temporal order of cell firing is different from chance. Such 'first-order' analyses are focused on a single time point and template (map), and have been used to show, for instance, the existence of preplay. The major methodological challenge in first-order analyses is the construction and interpretation of different chance distributions. By contrast, 'second-order' analyses involve a comparison of SWR content between different time points, and/or between different templates. Typical second-order questions include tests of experience-dependence (replay) that compare SWR content before and after experience, and comparisons or replay between different arms of a maze. Such questions entail additional methodological challenges that can lead to biases in results and associated interpretations. We provide an inventory of analysis challenges for second-order questions about SWR content, and suggest ways of preventing, identifying and addressing possible analysis biases. Given evolving interest in understanding SWR content in more complex experimental scenarios and across different time scales, we expect these issues to become increasingly pervasive. This article is part of the Theo Murphy meeting issue 'Memory reactivation: replaying events past, present and future'.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Hippocampus - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Memory Consolidation - physiology</subject><subject>Opinion Piece</subject><issn>0962-8436</issn><issn>1471-2970</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkE1PwzAMhiMEYmNw5Yh65NKSr7bJBQkmvqRJcIBzlLbOFtQ1JemQ9u9JtTGBD_bB9uvXD0KXBGcES3Hjw1BlFBOZYcrEEZoSXpKUyhIfoymWBU0FZ8UEnYXwiTGWeclP0YRRykUp8BTdv3m39BBCorsmsSFsICS2SwLUrmtS5xvwsaXbbbAhcSZZ2b53tV73uk089K3enqMTo9sAF_s6Qx-PD-_z53Tx-vQyv1ukdc7kkDIJBoTUUIqq5pgCNlgXYKromBGTF9JAHo2XFPPcSKxr2TTCiBiSFJVkM3S70-031RqaGrrB61b13q613yqnrfrf6exKLd23iopSkjIKXO8FvPuKfw5qbUMNbas7cJugIsCCM17GNEPZbrT2LgQP5nCGYDWCVyN4NYJXI_i4cPXX3GH8lzT7AfmagLg</recordid><startdate>20200525</startdate><enddate>20200525</enddate><creator>van der Meer, Matthijs A A</creator><creator>Kemere, Caleb</creator><creator>Diba, Kamran</creator><general>The Royal Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5128-4478</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2206-4473</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200525</creationdate><title>Progress and issues in second-order analysis of hippocampal replay</title><author>van der Meer, Matthijs A A ; Kemere, Caleb ; Diba, Kamran</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-39efe89ae78bc402e0f0a6efb14731f569fe529772045f90ac9dd8f8888916b93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Hippocampus - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Memory Consolidation - physiology</topic><topic>Opinion Piece</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van der Meer, Matthijs A A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemere, Caleb</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diba, Kamran</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van der Meer, Matthijs A A</au><au>Kemere, Caleb</au><au>Diba, Kamran</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Progress and issues in second-order analysis of hippocampal replay</atitle><jtitle>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci</addtitle><date>2020-05-25</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>375</volume><issue>1799</issue><spage>20190238</spage><epage>20190238</epage><pages>20190238-20190238</pages><issn>0962-8436</issn><eissn>1471-2970</eissn><abstract>Patterns of neural activity that occur spontaneously during sharp-wave ripple (SWR) events in the hippocampus are thought to play an important role in memory formation, consolidation and retrieval. Typical studies examining the content of SWRs seek to determine whether the identity and/or temporal order of cell firing is different from chance. Such 'first-order' analyses are focused on a single time point and template (map), and have been used to show, for instance, the existence of preplay. The major methodological challenge in first-order analyses is the construction and interpretation of different chance distributions. By contrast, 'second-order' analyses involve a comparison of SWR content between different time points, and/or between different templates. Typical second-order questions include tests of experience-dependence (replay) that compare SWR content before and after experience, and comparisons or replay between different arms of a maze. Such questions entail additional methodological challenges that can lead to biases in results and associated interpretations. We provide an inventory of analysis challenges for second-order questions about SWR content, and suggest ways of preventing, identifying and addressing possible analysis biases. Given evolving interest in understanding SWR content in more complex experimental scenarios and across different time scales, we expect these issues to become increasingly pervasive. This article is part of the Theo Murphy meeting issue 'Memory reactivation: replaying events past, present and future'.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The Royal Society</pub><pmid>32248780</pmid><doi>10.1098/rstb.2019.0238</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5128-4478</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2206-4473</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0962-8436 |
ispartof | Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences, 2020-05, Vol.375 (1799), p.20190238-20190238 |
issn | 0962-8436 1471-2970 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7209917 |
source | MEDLINE; PubMed Central; JSTOR |
subjects | Animals Hippocampus - physiology Humans Memory Consolidation - physiology Opinion Piece |
title | Progress and issues in second-order analysis of hippocampal replay |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T19%3A40%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Progress%20and%20issues%20in%20second-order%20analysis%20of%20hippocampal%20replay&rft.jtitle=Philosophical%20transactions%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society%20of%20London.%20Series%20B.%20Biological%20sciences&rft.au=van%20der%20Meer,%20Matthijs%20A%20A&rft.date=2020-05-25&rft.volume=375&rft.issue=1799&rft.spage=20190238&rft.epage=20190238&rft.pages=20190238-20190238&rft.issn=0962-8436&rft.eissn=1471-2970&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rstb.2019.0238&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2386434764%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2386434764&rft_id=info:pmid/32248780&rfr_iscdi=true |