Embedded axonal fiber tracts improve finite element model predictions of traumatic brain injury

With the growing rate of traumatic brain injury (TBI), there is an increasing interest in validated tools to predict and prevent brain injuries. Finite element models (FEM) are valuable tools to estimate tissue responses, predict probability of TBI, and guide the development of safety equipment. In...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology 2020-06, Vol.19 (3), p.1109-1130
Hauptverfasser: Hajiaghamemar, Marzieh, Wu, Taotao, Panzer, Matthew B., Margulies, Susan S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1130
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1109
container_title Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology
container_volume 19
creator Hajiaghamemar, Marzieh
Wu, Taotao
Panzer, Matthew B.
Margulies, Susan S.
description With the growing rate of traumatic brain injury (TBI), there is an increasing interest in validated tools to predict and prevent brain injuries. Finite element models (FEM) are valuable tools to estimate tissue responses, predict probability of TBI, and guide the development of safety equipment. In this study, we developed and validated an anisotropic pig brain multi-scale FEM by explicitly embedding the axonal tract structures and utilized the model to simulate experimental TBI in piglets undergoing dynamic head rotations. Binary logistic regression, survival analysis with Weibull distribution, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, coupled with repeated k -fold cross-validation technique, were used to examine 12 FEM-derived metrics related to axonal/brain tissue strain and strain rate for predicting the presence or absence of traumatic axonal injury (TAI). All 12 metrics performed well in predicting of TAI with prediction accuracy rate of 73–90%. The axonal-based metrics outperformed their rival brain tissue-based metrics in predicting TAI. The best predictors of TAI were maximum axonal strain times strain rate (MASxSR) and its corresponding optimal fraction-based metric (AF-MASxSR 7.5 ) that represents the fraction of axonal fibers exceeding MASxSR of 7.5 s −1 . The thresholds compare favorably with tissue tolerances found in in–vitro/in–vivo measurements in the literature. In addition, the damaged volume fractions (DVF) predicted using the axonal-based metrics, especially MASxSR (DVF = 0.05–4.5%), were closer to the actual DVF obtained from histopathology (AIV = 0.02–1.65%) in comparison with the DVF predicted using the brain-related metrics (DVF = 0.11–41.2%). The methods and the results from this study can be used to improve model prediction of TBI in humans.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10237-019-01273-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7203590</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2322736706</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-873a5c5d9eb80f5b4100056da00818879eb664841158af110da5c9e6aece5d0f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFu3CAQhlHVqNlu8gI5RBx7cTsY2-BLpGq1aSut1EtyRhjGCSsbNmBHzduHzW5W7aUHBJr5559hPkKuGHxlAOJbYlByUQBr8ykFL-QHsmANE4VoK_h4etftOfmc0hagBC75J3LOmWSsYmJB1Hrs0Fq0VP8JXg-0dx1GOkVtpkTduIvhGXPQuwkpDjiin-gYLA50F9E6M7ngEw39vmQe9eQM7aJ2njq_nePLBTnr9ZDw8ngvyf3t-m71s9j8_vFr9X1TmKpqpkIKrmtT2xY7CX3dVfmDUDdWA0gmpcjxpqlkxVgtdc8Y2CxvsdFosLbQ8yW5Ofju5m5Ea_KYUQ9qF92o44sK2ql_M949qofwrETeSd1CNvhyNIjhacY0qdElg8OgPYY5qZKXecWNgCZLy4PUxJBSxP7UhoHak1EHMiqTUW9klMxF138PeCp5R5EF_CBIOeUfMKptmGNGkv5n-wraLpuu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2322736706</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Embedded axonal fiber tracts improve finite element model predictions of traumatic brain injury</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Hajiaghamemar, Marzieh ; Wu, Taotao ; Panzer, Matthew B. ; Margulies, Susan S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hajiaghamemar, Marzieh ; Wu, Taotao ; Panzer, Matthew B. ; Margulies, Susan S.</creatorcontrib><description>With the growing rate of traumatic brain injury (TBI), there is an increasing interest in validated tools to predict and prevent brain injuries. Finite element models (FEM) are valuable tools to estimate tissue responses, predict probability of TBI, and guide the development of safety equipment. In this study, we developed and validated an anisotropic pig brain multi-scale FEM by explicitly embedding the axonal tract structures and utilized the model to simulate experimental TBI in piglets undergoing dynamic head rotations. Binary logistic regression, survival analysis with Weibull distribution, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, coupled with repeated k -fold cross-validation technique, were used to examine 12 FEM-derived metrics related to axonal/brain tissue strain and strain rate for predicting the presence or absence of traumatic axonal injury (TAI). All 12 metrics performed well in predicting of TAI with prediction accuracy rate of 73–90%. The axonal-based metrics outperformed their rival brain tissue-based metrics in predicting TAI. The best predictors of TAI were maximum axonal strain times strain rate (MASxSR) and its corresponding optimal fraction-based metric (AF-MASxSR 7.5 ) that represents the fraction of axonal fibers exceeding MASxSR of 7.5 s −1 . The thresholds compare favorably with tissue tolerances found in in–vitro/in–vivo measurements in the literature. In addition, the damaged volume fractions (DVF) predicted using the axonal-based metrics, especially MASxSR (DVF = 0.05–4.5%), were closer to the actual DVF obtained from histopathology (AIV = 0.02–1.65%) in comparison with the DVF predicted using the brain-related metrics (DVF = 0.11–41.2%). The methods and the results from this study can be used to improve model prediction of TBI in humans.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1617-7959</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1617-7940</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10237-019-01273-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31811417</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Animals ; Anisotropy ; Axons - physiology ; Biological and Medical Physics ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering ; Biophysics ; Brain - physiology ; Brain Injuries, Traumatic - physiopathology ; Computer Simulation ; Diffusion Tensor Imaging ; Engineering ; Finite Element Analysis ; Head - pathology ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; Models, Animal ; Original Paper ; Probability ; Reproducibility of Results ; ROC Curve ; Stress, Mechanical ; Swine ; Theoretical and Applied Mechanics ; White Matter - pathology</subject><ispartof>Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2020-06, Vol.19 (3), p.1109-1130</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-873a5c5d9eb80f5b4100056da00818879eb664841158af110da5c9e6aece5d0f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-873a5c5d9eb80f5b4100056da00818879eb664841158af110da5c9e6aece5d0f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0232-2447</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10237-019-01273-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10237-019-01273-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31811417$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hajiaghamemar, Marzieh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Taotao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panzer, Matthew B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Margulies, Susan S.</creatorcontrib><title>Embedded axonal fiber tracts improve finite element model predictions of traumatic brain injury</title><title>Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology</title><addtitle>Biomech Model Mechanobiol</addtitle><addtitle>Biomech Model Mechanobiol</addtitle><description>With the growing rate of traumatic brain injury (TBI), there is an increasing interest in validated tools to predict and prevent brain injuries. Finite element models (FEM) are valuable tools to estimate tissue responses, predict probability of TBI, and guide the development of safety equipment. In this study, we developed and validated an anisotropic pig brain multi-scale FEM by explicitly embedding the axonal tract structures and utilized the model to simulate experimental TBI in piglets undergoing dynamic head rotations. Binary logistic regression, survival analysis with Weibull distribution, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, coupled with repeated k -fold cross-validation technique, were used to examine 12 FEM-derived metrics related to axonal/brain tissue strain and strain rate for predicting the presence or absence of traumatic axonal injury (TAI). All 12 metrics performed well in predicting of TAI with prediction accuracy rate of 73–90%. The axonal-based metrics outperformed their rival brain tissue-based metrics in predicting TAI. The best predictors of TAI were maximum axonal strain times strain rate (MASxSR) and its corresponding optimal fraction-based metric (AF-MASxSR 7.5 ) that represents the fraction of axonal fibers exceeding MASxSR of 7.5 s −1 . The thresholds compare favorably with tissue tolerances found in in–vitro/in–vivo measurements in the literature. In addition, the damaged volume fractions (DVF) predicted using the axonal-based metrics, especially MASxSR (DVF = 0.05–4.5%), were closer to the actual DVF obtained from histopathology (AIV = 0.02–1.65%) in comparison with the DVF predicted using the brain-related metrics (DVF = 0.11–41.2%). The methods and the results from this study can be used to improve model prediction of TBI in humans.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anisotropy</subject><subject>Axons - physiology</subject><subject>Biological and Medical Physics</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering</subject><subject>Biophysics</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Brain Injuries, Traumatic - physiopathology</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Diffusion Tensor Imaging</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Finite Element Analysis</subject><subject>Head - pathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Models, Animal</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Stress, Mechanical</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Theoretical and Applied Mechanics</subject><subject>White Matter - pathology</subject><issn>1617-7959</issn><issn>1617-7940</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFu3CAQhlHVqNlu8gI5RBx7cTsY2-BLpGq1aSut1EtyRhjGCSsbNmBHzduHzW5W7aUHBJr5559hPkKuGHxlAOJbYlByUQBr8ykFL-QHsmANE4VoK_h4etftOfmc0hagBC75J3LOmWSsYmJB1Hrs0Fq0VP8JXg-0dx1GOkVtpkTduIvhGXPQuwkpDjiin-gYLA50F9E6M7ngEw39vmQe9eQM7aJ2njq_nePLBTnr9ZDw8ngvyf3t-m71s9j8_vFr9X1TmKpqpkIKrmtT2xY7CX3dVfmDUDdWA0gmpcjxpqlkxVgtdc8Y2CxvsdFosLbQ8yW5Ofju5m5Ea_KYUQ9qF92o44sK2ql_M949qofwrETeSd1CNvhyNIjhacY0qdElg8OgPYY5qZKXecWNgCZLy4PUxJBSxP7UhoHak1EHMiqTUW9klMxF138PeCp5R5EF_CBIOeUfMKptmGNGkv5n-wraLpuu</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>Hajiaghamemar, Marzieh</creator><creator>Wu, Taotao</creator><creator>Panzer, Matthew B.</creator><creator>Margulies, Susan S.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0232-2447</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>Embedded axonal fiber tracts improve finite element model predictions of traumatic brain injury</title><author>Hajiaghamemar, Marzieh ; Wu, Taotao ; Panzer, Matthew B. ; Margulies, Susan S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-873a5c5d9eb80f5b4100056da00818879eb664841158af110da5c9e6aece5d0f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anisotropy</topic><topic>Axons - physiology</topic><topic>Biological and Medical Physics</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering</topic><topic>Biophysics</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Brain Injuries, Traumatic - physiopathology</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Diffusion Tensor Imaging</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Finite Element Analysis</topic><topic>Head - pathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Models, Animal</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Stress, Mechanical</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Theoretical and Applied Mechanics</topic><topic>White Matter - pathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hajiaghamemar, Marzieh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Taotao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panzer, Matthew B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Margulies, Susan S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hajiaghamemar, Marzieh</au><au>Wu, Taotao</au><au>Panzer, Matthew B.</au><au>Margulies, Susan S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Embedded axonal fiber tracts improve finite element model predictions of traumatic brain injury</atitle><jtitle>Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology</jtitle><stitle>Biomech Model Mechanobiol</stitle><addtitle>Biomech Model Mechanobiol</addtitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1109</spage><epage>1130</epage><pages>1109-1130</pages><issn>1617-7959</issn><eissn>1617-7940</eissn><abstract>With the growing rate of traumatic brain injury (TBI), there is an increasing interest in validated tools to predict and prevent brain injuries. Finite element models (FEM) are valuable tools to estimate tissue responses, predict probability of TBI, and guide the development of safety equipment. In this study, we developed and validated an anisotropic pig brain multi-scale FEM by explicitly embedding the axonal tract structures and utilized the model to simulate experimental TBI in piglets undergoing dynamic head rotations. Binary logistic regression, survival analysis with Weibull distribution, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, coupled with repeated k -fold cross-validation technique, were used to examine 12 FEM-derived metrics related to axonal/brain tissue strain and strain rate for predicting the presence or absence of traumatic axonal injury (TAI). All 12 metrics performed well in predicting of TAI with prediction accuracy rate of 73–90%. The axonal-based metrics outperformed their rival brain tissue-based metrics in predicting TAI. The best predictors of TAI were maximum axonal strain times strain rate (MASxSR) and its corresponding optimal fraction-based metric (AF-MASxSR 7.5 ) that represents the fraction of axonal fibers exceeding MASxSR of 7.5 s −1 . The thresholds compare favorably with tissue tolerances found in in–vitro/in–vivo measurements in the literature. In addition, the damaged volume fractions (DVF) predicted using the axonal-based metrics, especially MASxSR (DVF = 0.05–4.5%), were closer to the actual DVF obtained from histopathology (AIV = 0.02–1.65%) in comparison with the DVF predicted using the brain-related metrics (DVF = 0.11–41.2%). The methods and the results from this study can be used to improve model prediction of TBI in humans.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>31811417</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10237-019-01273-8</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0232-2447</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1617-7959
ispartof Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2020-06, Vol.19 (3), p.1109-1130
issn 1617-7959
1617-7940
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7203590
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Algorithms
Animals
Anisotropy
Axons - physiology
Biological and Medical Physics
Biomechanical Phenomena
Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering
Biophysics
Brain - physiology
Brain Injuries, Traumatic - physiopathology
Computer Simulation
Diffusion Tensor Imaging
Engineering
Finite Element Analysis
Head - pathology
Humans
Logistic Models
Models, Animal
Original Paper
Probability
Reproducibility of Results
ROC Curve
Stress, Mechanical
Swine
Theoretical and Applied Mechanics
White Matter - pathology
title Embedded axonal fiber tracts improve finite element model predictions of traumatic brain injury
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T20%3A15%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Embedded%20axonal%20fiber%20tracts%20improve%20finite%20element%20model%20predictions%20of%20traumatic%20brain%20injury&rft.jtitle=Biomechanics%20and%20modeling%20in%20mechanobiology&rft.au=Hajiaghamemar,%20Marzieh&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1109&rft.epage=1130&rft.pages=1109-1130&rft.issn=1617-7959&rft.eissn=1617-7940&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10237-019-01273-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2322736706%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2322736706&rft_id=info:pmid/31811417&rfr_iscdi=true