A Taxonomy of Brain-Behavior Relationships after Stroke
Purpose: Understanding the brain basis of language and cognitive outcomes is a major goal of aphasia research. Prior studies have not often considered the many ways that brain features can relate to behavioral outcomes or the mechanisms underlying these relationships. The purpose of this review arti...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of speech, language, and hearing research language, and hearing research, 2019-11, Vol.62 (11), p.3907-3922 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3922 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 3907 |
container_title | Journal of speech, language, and hearing research |
container_volume | 62 |
creator | Turkeltaub, Peter E |
description | Purpose: Understanding the brain basis of language and cognitive outcomes is a major goal of aphasia research. Prior studies have not often considered the many ways that brain features can relate to behavioral outcomes or the mechanisms underlying these relationships. The purpose of this review article is to provide a new framework for understanding the ways that brain features may relate to language and cognitive outcomes from stroke. Method: Brain-behavior relationships that may be important for aphasia outcomes are organized into a taxonomy, including features of the lesion and features of brain tissue spared by the lesion. Features of spared brain tissue are categorized into those that change after stroke and those that do not. Features that change are further subdivided, and multiple mechanisms of brain change after stroke are discussed. Results: Features of the stroke, including size, location, and white matter damage, relate to many behavioral outcomes and likely account for most of the variance in outcomes. Features of the spared brain tissue that are unchanged by stroke, such as prior ischemic disease in the white matter, contribute to outcomes. Many different neurobiological and behavioral mechanisms may drive changes in the brain after stroke in association with behavioral recovery. Changes primarily driven by neurobiology are likely to occur in brain regions with a systematic relationship to the stroke distribution. Changes primarily driven by behavior are likely to occur in brain networks related to the behavior driving the change. Conclusions: Organizing the various hypothesized brain-behavior relationships according to this framework and considering the mechanisms that drive these relationships may help investigators develop specific experimental designs and more complete statistical models to explain language and cognitive abilities after stroke. Eight main recommendations for future research are provided. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-RSNP-19-0032 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7203524</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A609142978</galeid><ericid>EJ1236737</ericid><sourcerecordid>A609142978</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c609t-6ce4ef1cd0a4571212bbeb9b273570106e1f9bb934bce85f3100058d3144a4ce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkttu1DAQhiMEoqXwCKAgJMSNi085-KbStiqUKgK0W64txzvZuCT2YidV-_Z12LLtorUln-absWf8J8l7go8J5vwzxUTIy0V1MUcVmi--_0REIIwZfZYckiwrkSCYPo9rLCjirCwPklchXOPYCM9fJgeMFFkeycOkmKVX6tZZ19-lrklPvTIWnUKrbozz6Rw6NRhnQ2vWIVXNAD5dDN79htfJi0Z1Ad48zEfJry_nV2cXqPrx9dvZrEI6x2JAuQYODdFLrHhWEEpoXUMtalqwrMAE50AaUdeC8VpDmTWMxDdm5ZIRzhXXwI6Sk03c9Vj3sNRgB686ufamV_5OOmXkrsWaVq7cjSwoZhnlMcCnhwDe_RkhDLI3QUPXKQtuDJJOtSjzXIiIfvgPvXajtzG9SNEyy-PIH6mV6kAa27h4r56CylnMmXAqijJSaA-1Agvxkc5CY-LxDn-8h499Cb3Rex0-PnFoQXVDG1w3_v2uXVBsQO1dCB6abfEIlpOc5KOcZCUnOcm4n-QUfd89rf7W859-IvB2A4A3ems-vySU5QUr2D1_p83C</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2328562324</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Taxonomy of Brain-Behavior Relationships after Stroke</title><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Turkeltaub, Peter E</creator><creatorcontrib>Turkeltaub, Peter E</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: Understanding the brain basis of language and cognitive outcomes is a major goal of aphasia research. Prior studies have not often considered the many ways that brain features can relate to behavioral outcomes or the mechanisms underlying these relationships. The purpose of this review article is to provide a new framework for understanding the ways that brain features may relate to language and cognitive outcomes from stroke. Method: Brain-behavior relationships that may be important for aphasia outcomes are organized into a taxonomy, including features of the lesion and features of brain tissue spared by the lesion. Features of spared brain tissue are categorized into those that change after stroke and those that do not. Features that change are further subdivided, and multiple mechanisms of brain change after stroke are discussed. Results: Features of the stroke, including size, location, and white matter damage, relate to many behavioral outcomes and likely account for most of the variance in outcomes. Features of the spared brain tissue that are unchanged by stroke, such as prior ischemic disease in the white matter, contribute to outcomes. Many different neurobiological and behavioral mechanisms may drive changes in the brain after stroke in association with behavioral recovery. Changes primarily driven by neurobiology are likely to occur in brain regions with a systematic relationship to the stroke distribution. Changes primarily driven by behavior are likely to occur in brain networks related to the behavior driving the change. Conclusions: Organizing the various hypothesized brain-behavior relationships according to this framework and considering the mechanisms that drive these relationships may help investigators develop specific experimental designs and more complete statistical models to explain language and cognitive abilities after stroke. Eight main recommendations for future research are provided.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1092-4388</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-9102</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-RSNP-19-0032</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31756155</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Aphasia ; Behavior ; Brain ; Brain damage ; Brain Hemisphere Functions ; Brain research ; Cognitive ability ; Cognitive Processes ; Forum: Advances in Neuroplasticity Research on Language Recovery in Aphasia ; Hypotheses ; Individual Differences ; Language ; Language Impairments ; Language thought relationship ; Networks ; Neurolinguistics ; Neurological Impairments ; Neurology ; Neurophysiology ; Neurosciences ; Outcome Measures ; Researchers ; Stroke ; Studies ; Taxonomy</subject><ispartof>Journal of speech, language, and hearing research, 2019-11, Vol.62 (11), p.3907-3922</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Nov 2019</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c609t-6ce4ef1cd0a4571212bbeb9b273570106e1f9bb934bce85f3100058d3144a4ce3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c609t-6ce4ef1cd0a4571212bbeb9b273570106e1f9bb934bce85f3100058d3144a4ce3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1236737$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31756155$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Turkeltaub, Peter E</creatorcontrib><title>A Taxonomy of Brain-Behavior Relationships after Stroke</title><title>Journal of speech, language, and hearing research</title><addtitle>J Speech Lang Hear Res</addtitle><description>Purpose: Understanding the brain basis of language and cognitive outcomes is a major goal of aphasia research. Prior studies have not often considered the many ways that brain features can relate to behavioral outcomes or the mechanisms underlying these relationships. The purpose of this review article is to provide a new framework for understanding the ways that brain features may relate to language and cognitive outcomes from stroke. Method: Brain-behavior relationships that may be important for aphasia outcomes are organized into a taxonomy, including features of the lesion and features of brain tissue spared by the lesion. Features of spared brain tissue are categorized into those that change after stroke and those that do not. Features that change are further subdivided, and multiple mechanisms of brain change after stroke are discussed. Results: Features of the stroke, including size, location, and white matter damage, relate to many behavioral outcomes and likely account for most of the variance in outcomes. Features of the spared brain tissue that are unchanged by stroke, such as prior ischemic disease in the white matter, contribute to outcomes. Many different neurobiological and behavioral mechanisms may drive changes in the brain after stroke in association with behavioral recovery. Changes primarily driven by neurobiology are likely to occur in brain regions with a systematic relationship to the stroke distribution. Changes primarily driven by behavior are likely to occur in brain networks related to the behavior driving the change. Conclusions: Organizing the various hypothesized brain-behavior relationships according to this framework and considering the mechanisms that drive these relationships may help investigators develop specific experimental designs and more complete statistical models to explain language and cognitive abilities after stroke. Eight main recommendations for future research are provided.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Aphasia</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Brain damage</subject><subject>Brain Hemisphere Functions</subject><subject>Brain research</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>Forum: Advances in Neuroplasticity Research on Language Recovery in Aphasia</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Individual Differences</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Language Impairments</subject><subject>Language thought relationship</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Neurolinguistics</subject><subject>Neurological Impairments</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neurophysiology</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Outcome Measures</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Stroke</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><issn>1092-4388</issn><issn>1558-9102</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkttu1DAQhiMEoqXwCKAgJMSNi085-KbStiqUKgK0W64txzvZuCT2YidV-_Z12LLtorUln-absWf8J8l7go8J5vwzxUTIy0V1MUcVmi--_0REIIwZfZYckiwrkSCYPo9rLCjirCwPklchXOPYCM9fJgeMFFkeycOkmKVX6tZZ19-lrklPvTIWnUKrbozz6Rw6NRhnQ2vWIVXNAD5dDN79htfJi0Z1Ad48zEfJry_nV2cXqPrx9dvZrEI6x2JAuQYODdFLrHhWEEpoXUMtalqwrMAE50AaUdeC8VpDmTWMxDdm5ZIRzhXXwI6Sk03c9Vj3sNRgB686ufamV_5OOmXkrsWaVq7cjSwoZhnlMcCnhwDe_RkhDLI3QUPXKQtuDJJOtSjzXIiIfvgPvXajtzG9SNEyy-PIH6mV6kAa27h4r56CylnMmXAqijJSaA-1Agvxkc5CY-LxDn-8h499Cb3Rex0-PnFoQXVDG1w3_v2uXVBsQO1dCB6abfEIlpOc5KOcZCUnOcm4n-QUfd89rf7W859-IvB2A4A3ems-vySU5QUr2D1_p83C</recordid><startdate>20191101</startdate><enddate>20191101</enddate><creator>Turkeltaub, Peter E</creator><general>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191101</creationdate><title>A Taxonomy of Brain-Behavior Relationships after Stroke</title><author>Turkeltaub, Peter E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c609t-6ce4ef1cd0a4571212bbeb9b273570106e1f9bb934bce85f3100058d3144a4ce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Aphasia</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Brain damage</topic><topic>Brain Hemisphere Functions</topic><topic>Brain research</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>Forum: Advances in Neuroplasticity Research on Language Recovery in Aphasia</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Individual Differences</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Language Impairments</topic><topic>Language thought relationship</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Neurolinguistics</topic><topic>Neurological Impairments</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neurophysiology</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Outcome Measures</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Stroke</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Turkeltaub, Peter E</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of speech, language, and hearing research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Turkeltaub, Peter E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1236737</ericid><atitle>A Taxonomy of Brain-Behavior Relationships after Stroke</atitle><jtitle>Journal of speech, language, and hearing research</jtitle><addtitle>J Speech Lang Hear Res</addtitle><date>2019-11-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>3907</spage><epage>3922</epage><pages>3907-3922</pages><issn>1092-4388</issn><eissn>1558-9102</eissn><abstract>Purpose: Understanding the brain basis of language and cognitive outcomes is a major goal of aphasia research. Prior studies have not often considered the many ways that brain features can relate to behavioral outcomes or the mechanisms underlying these relationships. The purpose of this review article is to provide a new framework for understanding the ways that brain features may relate to language and cognitive outcomes from stroke. Method: Brain-behavior relationships that may be important for aphasia outcomes are organized into a taxonomy, including features of the lesion and features of brain tissue spared by the lesion. Features of spared brain tissue are categorized into those that change after stroke and those that do not. Features that change are further subdivided, and multiple mechanisms of brain change after stroke are discussed. Results: Features of the stroke, including size, location, and white matter damage, relate to many behavioral outcomes and likely account for most of the variance in outcomes. Features of the spared brain tissue that are unchanged by stroke, such as prior ischemic disease in the white matter, contribute to outcomes. Many different neurobiological and behavioral mechanisms may drive changes in the brain after stroke in association with behavioral recovery. Changes primarily driven by neurobiology are likely to occur in brain regions with a systematic relationship to the stroke distribution. Changes primarily driven by behavior are likely to occur in brain networks related to the behavior driving the change. Conclusions: Organizing the various hypothesized brain-behavior relationships according to this framework and considering the mechanisms that drive these relationships may help investigators develop specific experimental designs and more complete statistical models to explain language and cognitive abilities after stroke. Eight main recommendations for future research are provided.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</pub><pmid>31756155</pmid><doi>10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-RSNP-19-0032</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1092-4388 |
ispartof | Journal of speech, language, and hearing research, 2019-11, Vol.62 (11), p.3907-3922 |
issn | 1092-4388 1558-9102 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7203524 |
source | EBSCOhost Education Source; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Analysis Aphasia Behavior Brain Brain damage Brain Hemisphere Functions Brain research Cognitive ability Cognitive Processes Forum: Advances in Neuroplasticity Research on Language Recovery in Aphasia Hypotheses Individual Differences Language Language Impairments Language thought relationship Networks Neurolinguistics Neurological Impairments Neurology Neurophysiology Neurosciences Outcome Measures Researchers Stroke Studies Taxonomy |
title | A Taxonomy of Brain-Behavior Relationships after Stroke |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T06%3A52%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Taxonomy%20of%20Brain-Behavior%20Relationships%20after%20Stroke&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20speech,%20language,%20and%20hearing%20research&rft.au=Turkeltaub,%20Peter%20E&rft.date=2019-11-01&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=3907&rft.epage=3922&rft.pages=3907-3922&rft.issn=1092-4388&rft.eissn=1558-9102&rft_id=info:doi/10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-RSNP-19-0032&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA609142978%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2328562324&rft_id=info:pmid/31756155&rft_galeid=A609142978&rft_ericid=EJ1236737&rfr_iscdi=true |