Histologically Confirmed Diagnostic Efficacy of 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET for N-Staging of Patients with Primary High-Risk Prostate Cancer

18F-rhPSMA-7 (radiohybrid prostate-specific membrane antigen [PSMA]) is a novel ligand for PET imaging. Here, we present data from a retrospective analysis using PET/CT and PET/MRI examinations to investigate the efficacy of 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET for primary N-staging of patients with prostate cancer (PC...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978) 2020-05, Vol.61 (5), p.710-715
Hauptverfasser: Kroenke, Markus, Wurzer, Alexander, Schwamborn, Kristina, Ulbrich, Lena, Jooß, Lena, Maurer, Tobias, Horn, Thomas, Rauscher, Isabel, Haller, Bernhard, Herz, Michael, Wester, Hans-Jürgen, Weber, Wolfgang A, Eiber, Matthias
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 715
container_issue 5
container_start_page 710
container_title The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978)
container_volume 61
creator Kroenke, Markus
Wurzer, Alexander
Schwamborn, Kristina
Ulbrich, Lena
Jooß, Lena
Maurer, Tobias
Horn, Thomas
Rauscher, Isabel
Haller, Bernhard
Herz, Michael
Wester, Hans-Jürgen
Weber, Wolfgang A
Eiber, Matthias
description 18F-rhPSMA-7 (radiohybrid prostate-specific membrane antigen [PSMA]) is a novel ligand for PET imaging. Here, we present data from a retrospective analysis using PET/CT and PET/MRI examinations to investigate the efficacy of 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET for primary N-staging of patients with prostate cancer (PC) compared with morphologic imaging (CT or MRI) and validated by histopathology. Methods: Data from 58 patients with high-risk PC (according to the D'Amico criteria) who were staged with 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET/CT or PET/MRI at our institution between July 2017 and June 2018 were reviewed. The patients had a median prescan prostate-specific antigen value of 12.2 ng/mL (range, 1.2–81.6 ng/mL). The median injected activity of 18F-rhPSMA-7 was 327 MBq (range, 132–410 MBq), with a median uptake time of 79.5 min (range, 60–153 min). All patients underwent subsequent radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection. The presence of lymph node metastases was determined by an experienced reader independently for both the PET and the morphologic datasets using a template-based analysis on a 5-point scale. Patient-level and template-based results were both compared with histopathologic findings. Results: Lymph node metastases were present in 18 patients (31.0%) and were located in 52 of 375 templates (13.9%). Receiver-operating-characteristic analyses showed 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET to perform significantly better than morphologic imaging on both patient-based and template-based analyses (areas under curve, 0.858 vs. 0.649 [P = 0.012] and 0.765 vs. 0.589 [P < 0.001], respectively). On patient-based analyses, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET were 72.2%, 92.5%, and 86.2%, respectively, and those of morphologic imaging were 50.0%, 72.5%, and 65.5%, respectively. On template-based analyses, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET were 53.8%, 96.9%, and 90.9%, respectively, and those of morphologic imaging were 9.6%, 95.0%, and 83.2%, respectively. Conclusion: 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET is superior to morphologic imaging for N-staging of high-risk primary PC. The efficacy of 18F-rhPSMA-7 is similar to published data for 68Ga-PSMA-11.
doi_str_mv 10.2967/jnumed.119.234906
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7198390</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2336997816</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p1876-4ddc8883947ad011e4228f44ddc446fce68f3021a4dbb2388e920ac4b88b09ae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9j01PGzEYhC1EVQLtD-BmiQsXp_5ar32phEJoKtE2KvS88nrtjdONHexdqhz7zzGCS3vg9Eozo-edAeCc4DlVov60DdPOdnNC1JwyrrA4AjNSsQpVQtTHYIaJIKiqcHUCTnPeYoyFlPI9OGFEMiEkmYG_K5_HOMTeGz0MB7iIwflUqPDa6z7EPHoDl84V2xxgdJDIG5Q267tvV6iG6-U9dDHB7-hu1L0P_XNirUdvw5jhHz9u4Dr5nU4HuPL9Bv30-XdRClWPFi50MDZ9AO-cHrL9-HrPwK-b5f1ihW5_fPm6uLpFeyJrgXjXmVKeKV7rDhNiOaXS8WeZc-GMFdIxTInmXdtSJqVVFGvDWylbrLRlZ-DzC3c_tWWfKRWTHpr9S78mat_86wS_afr42NRElbe4AC5fASk-TDaPzc5nY4dBBxun3FDGhFK1JKJEL_6LbuOUQpnXUE4wV5yz6u0UphUWTHD2BBoklNg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2402506364</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Histologically Confirmed Diagnostic Efficacy of 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET for N-Staging of Patients with Primary High-Risk Prostate Cancer</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kroenke, Markus ; Wurzer, Alexander ; Schwamborn, Kristina ; Ulbrich, Lena ; Jooß, Lena ; Maurer, Tobias ; Horn, Thomas ; Rauscher, Isabel ; Haller, Bernhard ; Herz, Michael ; Wester, Hans-Jürgen ; Weber, Wolfgang A ; Eiber, Matthias</creator><creatorcontrib>Kroenke, Markus ; Wurzer, Alexander ; Schwamborn, Kristina ; Ulbrich, Lena ; Jooß, Lena ; Maurer, Tobias ; Horn, Thomas ; Rauscher, Isabel ; Haller, Bernhard ; Herz, Michael ; Wester, Hans-Jürgen ; Weber, Wolfgang A ; Eiber, Matthias</creatorcontrib><description>18F-rhPSMA-7 (radiohybrid prostate-specific membrane antigen [PSMA]) is a novel ligand for PET imaging. Here, we present data from a retrospective analysis using PET/CT and PET/MRI examinations to investigate the efficacy of 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET for primary N-staging of patients with prostate cancer (PC) compared with morphologic imaging (CT or MRI) and validated by histopathology. Methods: Data from 58 patients with high-risk PC (according to the D'Amico criteria) who were staged with 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET/CT or PET/MRI at our institution between July 2017 and June 2018 were reviewed. The patients had a median prescan prostate-specific antigen value of 12.2 ng/mL (range, 1.2–81.6 ng/mL). The median injected activity of 18F-rhPSMA-7 was 327 MBq (range, 132–410 MBq), with a median uptake time of 79.5 min (range, 60–153 min). All patients underwent subsequent radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection. The presence of lymph node metastases was determined by an experienced reader independently for both the PET and the morphologic datasets using a template-based analysis on a 5-point scale. Patient-level and template-based results were both compared with histopathologic findings. Results: Lymph node metastases were present in 18 patients (31.0%) and were located in 52 of 375 templates (13.9%). Receiver-operating-characteristic analyses showed 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET to perform significantly better than morphologic imaging on both patient-based and template-based analyses (areas under curve, 0.858 vs. 0.649 [P = 0.012] and 0.765 vs. 0.589 [P &lt; 0.001], respectively). On patient-based analyses, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET were 72.2%, 92.5%, and 86.2%, respectively, and those of morphologic imaging were 50.0%, 72.5%, and 65.5%, respectively. On template-based analyses, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET were 53.8%, 96.9%, and 90.9%, respectively, and those of morphologic imaging were 9.6%, 95.0%, and 83.2%, respectively. Conclusion: 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET is superior to morphologic imaging for N-staging of high-risk primary PC. The efficacy of 18F-rhPSMA-7 is similar to published data for 68Ga-PSMA-11.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-5505</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-5667</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.234906</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31836681</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Society of Nuclear Medicine</publisher><subject>Antigens ; Cancer surgery ; Computed tomography ; Diagnostic systems ; Fluorine isotopes ; Health risks ; Histopathology ; Lymph nodes ; Lymphatic system ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical imaging ; Metastases ; Metastasis ; Nodes ; Patients ; Positron emission ; Prostate cancer ; Prostate-specific antigen ; Prostatectomy ; Risk ; Sensitivity analysis ; Theranostics ; Tomography</subject><ispartof>The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978), 2020-05, Vol.61 (5), p.710-715</ispartof><rights>Copyright Society of Nuclear Medicine May 1, 2020</rights><rights>2020 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kroenke, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wurzer, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwamborn, Kristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulbrich, Lena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jooß, Lena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maurer, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horn, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rauscher, Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haller, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herz, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wester, Hans-Jürgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Wolfgang A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eiber, Matthias</creatorcontrib><title>Histologically Confirmed Diagnostic Efficacy of 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET for N-Staging of Patients with Primary High-Risk Prostate Cancer</title><title>The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978)</title><description>18F-rhPSMA-7 (radiohybrid prostate-specific membrane antigen [PSMA]) is a novel ligand for PET imaging. Here, we present data from a retrospective analysis using PET/CT and PET/MRI examinations to investigate the efficacy of 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET for primary N-staging of patients with prostate cancer (PC) compared with morphologic imaging (CT or MRI) and validated by histopathology. Methods: Data from 58 patients with high-risk PC (according to the D'Amico criteria) who were staged with 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET/CT or PET/MRI at our institution between July 2017 and June 2018 were reviewed. The patients had a median prescan prostate-specific antigen value of 12.2 ng/mL (range, 1.2–81.6 ng/mL). The median injected activity of 18F-rhPSMA-7 was 327 MBq (range, 132–410 MBq), with a median uptake time of 79.5 min (range, 60–153 min). All patients underwent subsequent radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection. The presence of lymph node metastases was determined by an experienced reader independently for both the PET and the morphologic datasets using a template-based analysis on a 5-point scale. Patient-level and template-based results were both compared with histopathologic findings. Results: Lymph node metastases were present in 18 patients (31.0%) and were located in 52 of 375 templates (13.9%). Receiver-operating-characteristic analyses showed 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET to perform significantly better than morphologic imaging on both patient-based and template-based analyses (areas under curve, 0.858 vs. 0.649 [P = 0.012] and 0.765 vs. 0.589 [P &lt; 0.001], respectively). On patient-based analyses, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET were 72.2%, 92.5%, and 86.2%, respectively, and those of morphologic imaging were 50.0%, 72.5%, and 65.5%, respectively. On template-based analyses, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET were 53.8%, 96.9%, and 90.9%, respectively, and those of morphologic imaging were 9.6%, 95.0%, and 83.2%, respectively. Conclusion: 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET is superior to morphologic imaging for N-staging of high-risk primary PC. The efficacy of 18F-rhPSMA-7 is similar to published data for 68Ga-PSMA-11.</description><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Cancer surgery</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>Fluorine isotopes</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Histopathology</subject><subject>Lymph nodes</subject><subject>Lymphatic system</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Metastases</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Nodes</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Positron emission</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostate-specific antigen</subject><subject>Prostatectomy</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Theranostics</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><issn>0161-5505</issn><issn>1535-5667</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9j01PGzEYhC1EVQLtD-BmiQsXp_5ar32phEJoKtE2KvS88nrtjdONHexdqhz7zzGCS3vg9Eozo-edAeCc4DlVov60DdPOdnNC1JwyrrA4AjNSsQpVQtTHYIaJIKiqcHUCTnPeYoyFlPI9OGFEMiEkmYG_K5_HOMTeGz0MB7iIwflUqPDa6z7EPHoDl84V2xxgdJDIG5Q267tvV6iG6-U9dDHB7-hu1L0P_XNirUdvw5jhHz9u4Dr5nU4HuPL9Bv30-XdRClWPFi50MDZ9AO-cHrL9-HrPwK-b5f1ihW5_fPm6uLpFeyJrgXjXmVKeKV7rDhNiOaXS8WeZc-GMFdIxTInmXdtSJqVVFGvDWylbrLRlZ-DzC3c_tWWfKRWTHpr9S78mat_86wS_afr42NRElbe4AC5fASk-TDaPzc5nY4dBBxun3FDGhFK1JKJEL_6LbuOUQpnXUE4wV5yz6u0UphUWTHD2BBoklNg</recordid><startdate>20200501</startdate><enddate>20200501</enddate><creator>Kroenke, Markus</creator><creator>Wurzer, Alexander</creator><creator>Schwamborn, Kristina</creator><creator>Ulbrich, Lena</creator><creator>Jooß, Lena</creator><creator>Maurer, Tobias</creator><creator>Horn, Thomas</creator><creator>Rauscher, Isabel</creator><creator>Haller, Bernhard</creator><creator>Herz, Michael</creator><creator>Wester, Hans-Jürgen</creator><creator>Weber, Wolfgang A</creator><creator>Eiber, Matthias</creator><general>Society of Nuclear Medicine</general><scope>4T-</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200501</creationdate><title>Histologically Confirmed Diagnostic Efficacy of 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET for N-Staging of Patients with Primary High-Risk Prostate Cancer</title><author>Kroenke, Markus ; Wurzer, Alexander ; Schwamborn, Kristina ; Ulbrich, Lena ; Jooß, Lena ; Maurer, Tobias ; Horn, Thomas ; Rauscher, Isabel ; Haller, Bernhard ; Herz, Michael ; Wester, Hans-Jürgen ; Weber, Wolfgang A ; Eiber, Matthias</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p1876-4ddc8883947ad011e4228f44ddc446fce68f3021a4dbb2388e920ac4b88b09ae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Cancer surgery</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>Fluorine isotopes</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Histopathology</topic><topic>Lymph nodes</topic><topic>Lymphatic system</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Metastases</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Nodes</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Positron emission</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostate-specific antigen</topic><topic>Prostatectomy</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Theranostics</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kroenke, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wurzer, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwamborn, Kristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulbrich, Lena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jooß, Lena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maurer, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horn, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rauscher, Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haller, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herz, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wester, Hans-Jürgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Wolfgang A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eiber, Matthias</creatorcontrib><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kroenke, Markus</au><au>Wurzer, Alexander</au><au>Schwamborn, Kristina</au><au>Ulbrich, Lena</au><au>Jooß, Lena</au><au>Maurer, Tobias</au><au>Horn, Thomas</au><au>Rauscher, Isabel</au><au>Haller, Bernhard</au><au>Herz, Michael</au><au>Wester, Hans-Jürgen</au><au>Weber, Wolfgang A</au><au>Eiber, Matthias</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Histologically Confirmed Diagnostic Efficacy of 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET for N-Staging of Patients with Primary High-Risk Prostate Cancer</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978)</jtitle><date>2020-05-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>710</spage><epage>715</epage><pages>710-715</pages><issn>0161-5505</issn><eissn>1535-5667</eissn><abstract>18F-rhPSMA-7 (radiohybrid prostate-specific membrane antigen [PSMA]) is a novel ligand for PET imaging. Here, we present data from a retrospective analysis using PET/CT and PET/MRI examinations to investigate the efficacy of 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET for primary N-staging of patients with prostate cancer (PC) compared with morphologic imaging (CT or MRI) and validated by histopathology. Methods: Data from 58 patients with high-risk PC (according to the D'Amico criteria) who were staged with 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET/CT or PET/MRI at our institution between July 2017 and June 2018 were reviewed. The patients had a median prescan prostate-specific antigen value of 12.2 ng/mL (range, 1.2–81.6 ng/mL). The median injected activity of 18F-rhPSMA-7 was 327 MBq (range, 132–410 MBq), with a median uptake time of 79.5 min (range, 60–153 min). All patients underwent subsequent radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection. The presence of lymph node metastases was determined by an experienced reader independently for both the PET and the morphologic datasets using a template-based analysis on a 5-point scale. Patient-level and template-based results were both compared with histopathologic findings. Results: Lymph node metastases were present in 18 patients (31.0%) and were located in 52 of 375 templates (13.9%). Receiver-operating-characteristic analyses showed 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET to perform significantly better than morphologic imaging on both patient-based and template-based analyses (areas under curve, 0.858 vs. 0.649 [P = 0.012] and 0.765 vs. 0.589 [P &lt; 0.001], respectively). On patient-based analyses, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET were 72.2%, 92.5%, and 86.2%, respectively, and those of morphologic imaging were 50.0%, 72.5%, and 65.5%, respectively. On template-based analyses, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET were 53.8%, 96.9%, and 90.9%, respectively, and those of morphologic imaging were 9.6%, 95.0%, and 83.2%, respectively. Conclusion: 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET is superior to morphologic imaging for N-staging of high-risk primary PC. The efficacy of 18F-rhPSMA-7 is similar to published data for 68Ga-PSMA-11.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Society of Nuclear Medicine</pub><pmid>31836681</pmid><doi>10.2967/jnumed.119.234906</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0161-5505
ispartof The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978), 2020-05, Vol.61 (5), p.710-715
issn 0161-5505
1535-5667
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7198390
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Antigens
Cancer surgery
Computed tomography
Diagnostic systems
Fluorine isotopes
Health risks
Histopathology
Lymph nodes
Lymphatic system
Magnetic resonance imaging
Medical diagnosis
Medical imaging
Metastases
Metastasis
Nodes
Patients
Positron emission
Prostate cancer
Prostate-specific antigen
Prostatectomy
Risk
Sensitivity analysis
Theranostics
Tomography
title Histologically Confirmed Diagnostic Efficacy of 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET for N-Staging of Patients with Primary High-Risk Prostate Cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T13%3A49%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Histologically%20Confirmed%20Diagnostic%20Efficacy%20of%2018F-rhPSMA-7%20PET%20for%20N-Staging%20of%20Patients%20with%20Primary%20High-Risk%20Prostate%20Cancer&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20nuclear%20medicine%20(1978)&rft.au=Kroenke,%20Markus&rft.date=2020-05-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=710&rft.epage=715&rft.pages=710-715&rft.issn=0161-5505&rft.eissn=1535-5667&rft_id=info:doi/10.2967/jnumed.119.234906&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2336997816%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2402506364&rft_id=info:pmid/31836681&rfr_iscdi=true