Leveraging Electronic Dental Record Data for Clinical Research in the National Dental PBRN Practices
Abstract Objectives The aim of this study is to determine the feasibility of conducting clinical research using electronic dental record (EDR) data from U.S. solo and small-group general dental practices in the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network (network) and evaluate the data complete...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Applied clinical informatics 2020-03, Vol.11 (2), p.305-314 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 314 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 305 |
container_title | Applied clinical informatics |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Thyvalikakath, Thankam Paul Duncan, William D. Siddiqui, Zasim LaPradd, Michelle Eckert, George Schleyer, Titus Rindal, Donald Brad Jurkovich, Mark Shea, Tracy Gilbert, Gregg H. |
description | Abstract
Objectives
The aim of this study is to determine the feasibility of conducting clinical research using electronic dental record (EDR) data from U.S. solo and small-group general dental practices in the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network (network) and evaluate the data completeness and correctness before performing survival analyses of root canal treatment (RCT) and posterior composite restorations (PCR).
Methods
Ninety-nine network general dentistry practices that used Dentrix or EagleSoft EDR shared de-identified data of patients who received PCR and/or RCT on permanent teeth through October 31, 2015. We evaluated the data completeness and correctness, summarized practice, and patient characteristics and summarized the two treatments by tooth type and arch location.
Results
Eighty-two percent of practitioners were male, with a mean age of 49 and 22.4 years of clinical experience. The final dataset comprised 217,887 patients and 11,289,594 observations, with the observation period ranging from 0 to 37 years. Most patients (73%) were 18 to 64 years old; 56% were female. The data were nearly 100% complete. Eight percent of observations had incorrect data, such as incorrect tooth number or surface, primary teeth, supernumerary teeth, and tooth ranges, indicating multitooth procedures instead of PCR or RCT. Seventy-three percent of patients had dental insurance information; 27% lacked any insurance information. While gender was documented for all patients, race/ethnicity was missing in the dataset.
Conclusion
This study established the feasibility of using EDR data integrated from multiple distinct solo and small-group network practices for longitudinal studies to assess treatment outcomes. The results laid the groundwork for a learning health system that enables practitioners to learn about their patients' outcomes by using data from their own practice. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1055/s-0040-1709506 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7190390</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>32349142</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-7dd471468c80b6b13bdff8873c61a6b19ae0c45005d394f8fe0ea430e0e456593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UEtrAjEQDqWlivXaY8kfWJtssq9LoVX7ALEi7Tlks7MaWTeSRKH_vrFasYeGgcnwPTL5ELqlZEBJkty7iBBOIpqRIiHpBerSPC0iwuLs8uzeQX3nViScJKV5nl2jDosZLyiPu6iawA6sXOh2gccNKG9NqxUeQetlg-egjK3wSHqJa2PxsNEB_QEcSKuWWLfYLwFPpdemDcBROHuaT_HMSuW1AneDrmrZOOgfew99Po8_hq_R5P3lbfg4iRSPcx9lVcUzytNc5aRMS8rKqq7DwkylVIa5kEAUT8I_KlbwOq-BgOSMhMaTNClYDz0cfDfbcg2VCrtY2YiN1Wtpv4SRWvxFWr0UC7MTGS0IC9VDg4OBssY5C_VJS4nYRy6c2EcujpEHwd35iyf6b8CBEB0IfqlhDWJltjbk5P4z_AYYvYrJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Leveraging Electronic Dental Record Data for Clinical Research in the National Dental PBRN Practices</title><source>PubMed Central</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Thyvalikakath, Thankam Paul ; Duncan, William D. ; Siddiqui, Zasim ; LaPradd, Michelle ; Eckert, George ; Schleyer, Titus ; Rindal, Donald Brad ; Jurkovich, Mark ; Shea, Tracy ; Gilbert, Gregg H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Thyvalikakath, Thankam Paul ; Duncan, William D. ; Siddiqui, Zasim ; LaPradd, Michelle ; Eckert, George ; Schleyer, Titus ; Rindal, Donald Brad ; Jurkovich, Mark ; Shea, Tracy ; Gilbert, Gregg H. ; National Dental PBRN Collaborative Group ; National Dental PBRN Collaborative Group</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Objectives
The aim of this study is to determine the feasibility of conducting clinical research using electronic dental record (EDR) data from U.S. solo and small-group general dental practices in the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network (network) and evaluate the data completeness and correctness before performing survival analyses of root canal treatment (RCT) and posterior composite restorations (PCR).
Methods
Ninety-nine network general dentistry practices that used Dentrix or EagleSoft EDR shared de-identified data of patients who received PCR and/or RCT on permanent teeth through October 31, 2015. We evaluated the data completeness and correctness, summarized practice, and patient characteristics and summarized the two treatments by tooth type and arch location.
Results
Eighty-two percent of practitioners were male, with a mean age of 49 and 22.4 years of clinical experience. The final dataset comprised 217,887 patients and 11,289,594 observations, with the observation period ranging from 0 to 37 years. Most patients (73%) were 18 to 64 years old; 56% were female. The data were nearly 100% complete. Eight percent of observations had incorrect data, such as incorrect tooth number or surface, primary teeth, supernumerary teeth, and tooth ranges, indicating multitooth procedures instead of PCR or RCT. Seventy-three percent of patients had dental insurance information; 27% lacked any insurance information. While gender was documented for all patients, race/ethnicity was missing in the dataset.
Conclusion
This study established the feasibility of using EDR data integrated from multiple distinct solo and small-group network practices for longitudinal studies to assess treatment outcomes. The results laid the groundwork for a learning health system that enables practitioners to learn about their patients' outcomes by using data from their own practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1869-0327</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1869-0327</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1709506</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32349142</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Stuttgart · New York: Georg Thieme Verlag KG</publisher><subject>Research Article</subject><ispartof>Applied clinical informatics, 2020-03, Vol.11 (2), p.305-314</ispartof><rights>Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.</rights><rights>Thieme Medical Publishers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-7dd471468c80b6b13bdff8873c61a6b19ae0c45005d394f8fe0ea430e0e456593</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7190390/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7190390/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32349142$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thyvalikakath, Thankam Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duncan, William D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siddiqui, Zasim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaPradd, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eckert, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schleyer, Titus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rindal, Donald Brad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jurkovich, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shea, Tracy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, Gregg H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>National Dental PBRN Collaborative Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>National Dental PBRN Collaborative Group</creatorcontrib><title>Leveraging Electronic Dental Record Data for Clinical Research in the National Dental PBRN Practices</title><title>Applied clinical informatics</title><addtitle>Appl Clin Inform</addtitle><description>Abstract
Objectives
The aim of this study is to determine the feasibility of conducting clinical research using electronic dental record (EDR) data from U.S. solo and small-group general dental practices in the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network (network) and evaluate the data completeness and correctness before performing survival analyses of root canal treatment (RCT) and posterior composite restorations (PCR).
Methods
Ninety-nine network general dentistry practices that used Dentrix or EagleSoft EDR shared de-identified data of patients who received PCR and/or RCT on permanent teeth through October 31, 2015. We evaluated the data completeness and correctness, summarized practice, and patient characteristics and summarized the two treatments by tooth type and arch location.
Results
Eighty-two percent of practitioners were male, with a mean age of 49 and 22.4 years of clinical experience. The final dataset comprised 217,887 patients and 11,289,594 observations, with the observation period ranging from 0 to 37 years. Most patients (73%) were 18 to 64 years old; 56% were female. The data were nearly 100% complete. Eight percent of observations had incorrect data, such as incorrect tooth number or surface, primary teeth, supernumerary teeth, and tooth ranges, indicating multitooth procedures instead of PCR or RCT. Seventy-three percent of patients had dental insurance information; 27% lacked any insurance information. While gender was documented for all patients, race/ethnicity was missing in the dataset.
Conclusion
This study established the feasibility of using EDR data integrated from multiple distinct solo and small-group network practices for longitudinal studies to assess treatment outcomes. The results laid the groundwork for a learning health system that enables practitioners to learn about their patients' outcomes by using data from their own practice.</description><subject>Research Article</subject><issn>1869-0327</issn><issn>1869-0327</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UEtrAjEQDqWlivXaY8kfWJtssq9LoVX7ALEi7Tlks7MaWTeSRKH_vrFasYeGgcnwPTL5ELqlZEBJkty7iBBOIpqRIiHpBerSPC0iwuLs8uzeQX3nViScJKV5nl2jDosZLyiPu6iawA6sXOh2gccNKG9NqxUeQetlg-egjK3wSHqJa2PxsNEB_QEcSKuWWLfYLwFPpdemDcBROHuaT_HMSuW1AneDrmrZOOgfew99Po8_hq_R5P3lbfg4iRSPcx9lVcUzytNc5aRMS8rKqq7DwkylVIa5kEAUT8I_KlbwOq-BgOSMhMaTNClYDz0cfDfbcg2VCrtY2YiN1Wtpv4SRWvxFWr0UC7MTGS0IC9VDg4OBssY5C_VJS4nYRy6c2EcujpEHwd35iyf6b8CBEB0IfqlhDWJltjbk5P4z_AYYvYrJ</recordid><startdate>202003</startdate><enddate>202003</enddate><creator>Thyvalikakath, Thankam Paul</creator><creator>Duncan, William D.</creator><creator>Siddiqui, Zasim</creator><creator>LaPradd, Michelle</creator><creator>Eckert, George</creator><creator>Schleyer, Titus</creator><creator>Rindal, Donald Brad</creator><creator>Jurkovich, Mark</creator><creator>Shea, Tracy</creator><creator>Gilbert, Gregg H.</creator><general>Georg Thieme Verlag KG</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202003</creationdate><title>Leveraging Electronic Dental Record Data for Clinical Research in the National Dental PBRN Practices</title><author>Thyvalikakath, Thankam Paul ; Duncan, William D. ; Siddiqui, Zasim ; LaPradd, Michelle ; Eckert, George ; Schleyer, Titus ; Rindal, Donald Brad ; Jurkovich, Mark ; Shea, Tracy ; Gilbert, Gregg H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-7dd471468c80b6b13bdff8873c61a6b19ae0c45005d394f8fe0ea430e0e456593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Research Article</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thyvalikakath, Thankam Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duncan, William D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siddiqui, Zasim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaPradd, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eckert, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schleyer, Titus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rindal, Donald Brad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jurkovich, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shea, Tracy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, Gregg H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>National Dental PBRN Collaborative Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>National Dental PBRN Collaborative Group</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Applied clinical informatics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thyvalikakath, Thankam Paul</au><au>Duncan, William D.</au><au>Siddiqui, Zasim</au><au>LaPradd, Michelle</au><au>Eckert, George</au><au>Schleyer, Titus</au><au>Rindal, Donald Brad</au><au>Jurkovich, Mark</au><au>Shea, Tracy</au><au>Gilbert, Gregg H.</au><aucorp>National Dental PBRN Collaborative Group</aucorp><aucorp>National Dental PBRN Collaborative Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Leveraging Electronic Dental Record Data for Clinical Research in the National Dental PBRN Practices</atitle><jtitle>Applied clinical informatics</jtitle><addtitle>Appl Clin Inform</addtitle><date>2020-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>305</spage><epage>314</epage><pages>305-314</pages><issn>1869-0327</issn><eissn>1869-0327</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Objectives
The aim of this study is to determine the feasibility of conducting clinical research using electronic dental record (EDR) data from U.S. solo and small-group general dental practices in the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network (network) and evaluate the data completeness and correctness before performing survival analyses of root canal treatment (RCT) and posterior composite restorations (PCR).
Methods
Ninety-nine network general dentistry practices that used Dentrix or EagleSoft EDR shared de-identified data of patients who received PCR and/or RCT on permanent teeth through October 31, 2015. We evaluated the data completeness and correctness, summarized practice, and patient characteristics and summarized the two treatments by tooth type and arch location.
Results
Eighty-two percent of practitioners were male, with a mean age of 49 and 22.4 years of clinical experience. The final dataset comprised 217,887 patients and 11,289,594 observations, with the observation period ranging from 0 to 37 years. Most patients (73%) were 18 to 64 years old; 56% were female. The data were nearly 100% complete. Eight percent of observations had incorrect data, such as incorrect tooth number or surface, primary teeth, supernumerary teeth, and tooth ranges, indicating multitooth procedures instead of PCR or RCT. Seventy-three percent of patients had dental insurance information; 27% lacked any insurance information. While gender was documented for all patients, race/ethnicity was missing in the dataset.
Conclusion
This study established the feasibility of using EDR data integrated from multiple distinct solo and small-group network practices for longitudinal studies to assess treatment outcomes. The results laid the groundwork for a learning health system that enables practitioners to learn about their patients' outcomes by using data from their own practice.</abstract><cop>Stuttgart · New York</cop><pub>Georg Thieme Verlag KG</pub><pmid>32349142</pmid><doi>10.1055/s-0040-1709506</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1869-0327 |
ispartof | Applied clinical informatics, 2020-03, Vol.11 (2), p.305-314 |
issn | 1869-0327 1869-0327 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7190390 |
source | PubMed Central; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Research Article |
title | Leveraging Electronic Dental Record Data for Clinical Research in the National Dental PBRN Practices |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T10%3A56%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Leveraging%20Electronic%20Dental%20Record%20Data%20for%20Clinical%20Research%20in%20the%20National%20Dental%20PBRN%20Practices&rft.jtitle=Applied%20clinical%20informatics&rft.au=Thyvalikakath,%20Thankam%20Paul&rft.aucorp=National%20Dental%20PBRN%20Collaborative%20Group&rft.date=2020-03&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=305&rft.epage=314&rft.pages=305-314&rft.issn=1869-0327&rft.eissn=1869-0327&rft_id=info:doi/10.1055/s-0040-1709506&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E32349142%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/32349142&rfr_iscdi=true |