Age Differences in Emotion Regulation Strategy Use, Variability, and Flexibility: An Experience Sampling Approach

Life span developmental theories suggest that as individuals age, they accumulate knowledge about how to deploy emotion regulation (ER) strategies effectively and learn how to match their ER strategy use with changes in situational demands. Using an event-contingent experience sampling design wherei...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Developmental psychology 2019-09, Vol.55 (9), p.1951-1964
Hauptverfasser: Benson, Lizbeth, English, Tammy, Conroy, David E., Pincus, Aaron L., Gerstorf, Denis, Ram, Nilam
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1964
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1951
container_title Developmental psychology
container_volume 55
creator Benson, Lizbeth
English, Tammy
Conroy, David E.
Pincus, Aaron L.
Gerstorf, Denis
Ram, Nilam
description Life span developmental theories suggest that as individuals age, they accumulate knowledge about how to deploy emotion regulation (ER) strategies effectively and learn how to match their ER strategy use with changes in situational demands. Using an event-contingent experience sampling design wherein 150 adults Age 18 to 89 years reported on 64,213 social interactions (M = 427.41, SD = 145.66) during 9 weeks of daily life, this study examines (a) age-related differences in individuals' usual ER strategy use (reappraisal, suppression) during everyday social interactions, (b) age-related differences in how much individuals' use of these two strategies varies across social situations-ER variability, and (c) age-related differences in the extent to which ER strategy use covaries with relational (close vs. nonclose others) and emotional (happy, sad) contextual features of those social situations-ER flexibility. In line with a small body of prior work, usual ER strategy use did not differ across adulthood and ER variability was lower at older ages. Results from multilevel models of intraindividual covariation suggested that individuals flexibly matched their ER strategy implementation to changes in emotional context-especially when interacting with close others. The results also provided evidence that the intraindividual covariation between relational context and use of suppression was weaker at older ages. Beyond these specific findings, this study demonstrated the utility of experience sampling designs, event-contingent reports, and the measurement/modeling of intraindividual variation and covariation for study of emotional development across the life span.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/dev0000727
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7189626</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1226553</ericid><sourcerecordid>2282446740</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a493t-93b7c3ec23862ca65979517486b1e2dd38f6ae4984acd8c6c26d86ffcdfbc3ab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkslv1DAUxi0W0aH0wh1kiQtCE4iXeOGANGqnLKqERClXy3Fepq6y1U6qzn9fDynDcsEXL99Pn_3eZ4Sek_wtyZl8V8FNnoak8gFaEM10lhdaP0RHWirCGVOaakUeoUWeE5oRwfUBehrjVdpyposn6IARLjjXcoGuVxvAJ76uIUDnIGLf4XXbj77v8DfYTI39uTwfgx1hs8UXEZb4hw3elr7x43aJbVfh0wZu_XzwHq-Sw-0Awe8M8blth8Z3G7wahtBbd_kMPa5tE-Hofj5EF6fr78efsrOvHz8fr84yyzUbM81K6Rg4ypSgzopCS10QyZUoCdCqYqoWFrhW3LpKOeGoqJSoa1fVpWO2ZIfow-w7TGULlYMu1dCYIfjWhq3prTd_K52_NJv-xkiitKAiGby-Nwj99QRxNK2PDprGdtBP0VCqKOdC8jyhr_5Br_opdKm8HZV6zvNc_IciWlEpikS9mSkX-hgD1Psnk9zs8je_80_wyz-L3KO_Ak7AixlIebi9vP5CKBVFwZK-nHU7WDPErbNh9K6B6KaQfsS4u8wUhdGGpPazO9EQwqc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2281982765</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Age Differences in Emotion Regulation Strategy Use, Variability, and Flexibility: An Experience Sampling Approach</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Benson, Lizbeth ; English, Tammy ; Conroy, David E. ; Pincus, Aaron L. ; Gerstorf, Denis ; Ram, Nilam</creator><contributor>Pollak, Seth D ; Camras, Linda A ; Dubow, Eric F ; Cole, Pamela M</contributor><creatorcontrib>Benson, Lizbeth ; English, Tammy ; Conroy, David E. ; Pincus, Aaron L. ; Gerstorf, Denis ; Ram, Nilam ; Pollak, Seth D ; Camras, Linda A ; Dubow, Eric F ; Cole, Pamela M</creatorcontrib><description>Life span developmental theories suggest that as individuals age, they accumulate knowledge about how to deploy emotion regulation (ER) strategies effectively and learn how to match their ER strategy use with changes in situational demands. Using an event-contingent experience sampling design wherein 150 adults Age 18 to 89 years reported on 64,213 social interactions (M = 427.41, SD = 145.66) during 9 weeks of daily life, this study examines (a) age-related differences in individuals' usual ER strategy use (reappraisal, suppression) during everyday social interactions, (b) age-related differences in how much individuals' use of these two strategies varies across social situations-ER variability, and (c) age-related differences in the extent to which ER strategy use covaries with relational (close vs. nonclose others) and emotional (happy, sad) contextual features of those social situations-ER flexibility. In line with a small body of prior work, usual ER strategy use did not differ across adulthood and ER variability was lower at older ages. Results from multilevel models of intraindividual covariation suggested that individuals flexibly matched their ER strategy implementation to changes in emotional context-especially when interacting with close others. The results also provided evidence that the intraindividual covariation between relational context and use of suppression was weaker at older ages. Beyond these specific findings, this study demonstrated the utility of experience sampling designs, event-contingent reports, and the measurement/modeling of intraindividual variation and covariation for study of emotional development across the life span.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-1649</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781433892981</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1433892987</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-0599</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/dev0000727</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31464497</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Activities of daily living ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Adult Development ; Adults ; Age ; Age Differences ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Cognitive Appraisal ; Ecological Momentary Assessment ; Emotional Development ; Emotional Experience ; Emotional Regulation ; Emotional Regulation - physiology ; Emotional Response ; Emotionality (Personality) ; Emotions ; Emotions - physiology ; Everyday life ; Female ; Flexibility ; Human ; Human Development ; Humans ; Interpersonal Competence ; Interpersonal Relations ; Interpersonal Relationship ; Intraindividual Variability ; Life Span ; Male ; Measurement ; Middle Aged ; Models, Statistical ; Pliability - physiology ; Psychological Patterns ; Sampling ; Self Control ; Social Interaction ; Social situations ; Strategies ; Test Construction ; Variability ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Developmental psychology, 2019-09, Vol.55 (9), p.1951-1964</ispartof><rights>2019 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2019, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Sep 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a493t-93b7c3ec23862ca65979517486b1e2dd38f6ae4984acd8c6c26d86ffcdfbc3ab3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0001-9895-5283</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,30976,33751</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1226553$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31464497$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Pollak, Seth D</contributor><contributor>Camras, Linda A</contributor><contributor>Dubow, Eric F</contributor><contributor>Cole, Pamela M</contributor><creatorcontrib>Benson, Lizbeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>English, Tammy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conroy, David E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pincus, Aaron L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerstorf, Denis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ram, Nilam</creatorcontrib><title>Age Differences in Emotion Regulation Strategy Use, Variability, and Flexibility: An Experience Sampling Approach</title><title>Developmental psychology</title><addtitle>Dev Psychol</addtitle><description>Life span developmental theories suggest that as individuals age, they accumulate knowledge about how to deploy emotion regulation (ER) strategies effectively and learn how to match their ER strategy use with changes in situational demands. Using an event-contingent experience sampling design wherein 150 adults Age 18 to 89 years reported on 64,213 social interactions (M = 427.41, SD = 145.66) during 9 weeks of daily life, this study examines (a) age-related differences in individuals' usual ER strategy use (reappraisal, suppression) during everyday social interactions, (b) age-related differences in how much individuals' use of these two strategies varies across social situations-ER variability, and (c) age-related differences in the extent to which ER strategy use covaries with relational (close vs. nonclose others) and emotional (happy, sad) contextual features of those social situations-ER flexibility. In line with a small body of prior work, usual ER strategy use did not differ across adulthood and ER variability was lower at older ages. Results from multilevel models of intraindividual covariation suggested that individuals flexibly matched their ER strategy implementation to changes in emotional context-especially when interacting with close others. The results also provided evidence that the intraindividual covariation between relational context and use of suppression was weaker at older ages. Beyond these specific findings, this study demonstrated the utility of experience sampling designs, event-contingent reports, and the measurement/modeling of intraindividual variation and covariation for study of emotional development across the life span.</description><subject>Activities of daily living</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adult Development</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Age Differences</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cognitive Appraisal</subject><subject>Ecological Momentary Assessment</subject><subject>Emotional Development</subject><subject>Emotional Experience</subject><subject>Emotional Regulation</subject><subject>Emotional Regulation - physiology</subject><subject>Emotional Response</subject><subject>Emotionality (Personality)</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Emotions - physiology</subject><subject>Everyday life</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Flexibility</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Human Development</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interpersonal Competence</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relations</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relationship</subject><subject>Intraindividual Variability</subject><subject>Life Span</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Pliability - physiology</subject><subject>Psychological Patterns</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Self Control</subject><subject>Social Interaction</subject><subject>Social situations</subject><subject>Strategies</subject><subject>Test Construction</subject><subject>Variability</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0012-1649</issn><issn>1939-0599</issn><isbn>9781433892981</isbn><isbn>1433892987</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkslv1DAUxi0W0aH0wh1kiQtCE4iXeOGANGqnLKqERClXy3Fepq6y1U6qzn9fDynDcsEXL99Pn_3eZ4Sek_wtyZl8V8FNnoak8gFaEM10lhdaP0RHWirCGVOaakUeoUWeE5oRwfUBehrjVdpyposn6IARLjjXcoGuVxvAJ76uIUDnIGLf4XXbj77v8DfYTI39uTwfgx1hs8UXEZb4hw3elr7x43aJbVfh0wZu_XzwHq-Sw-0Awe8M8blth8Z3G7wahtBbd_kMPa5tE-Hofj5EF6fr78efsrOvHz8fr84yyzUbM81K6Rg4ypSgzopCS10QyZUoCdCqYqoWFrhW3LpKOeGoqJSoa1fVpWO2ZIfow-w7TGULlYMu1dCYIfjWhq3prTd_K52_NJv-xkiitKAiGby-Nwj99QRxNK2PDprGdtBP0VCqKOdC8jyhr_5Br_opdKm8HZV6zvNc_IciWlEpikS9mSkX-hgD1Psnk9zs8je_80_wyz-L3KO_Ak7AixlIebi9vP5CKBVFwZK-nHU7WDPErbNh9K6B6KaQfsS4u8wUhdGGpPazO9EQwqc</recordid><startdate>20190901</startdate><enddate>20190901</enddate><creator>Benson, Lizbeth</creator><creator>English, Tammy</creator><creator>Conroy, David E.</creator><creator>Pincus, Aaron L.</creator><creator>Gerstorf, Denis</creator><creator>Ram, Nilam</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9895-5283</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190901</creationdate><title>Age Differences in Emotion Regulation Strategy Use, Variability, and Flexibility: An Experience Sampling Approach</title><author>Benson, Lizbeth ; English, Tammy ; Conroy, David E. ; Pincus, Aaron L. ; Gerstorf, Denis ; Ram, Nilam</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a493t-93b7c3ec23862ca65979517486b1e2dd38f6ae4984acd8c6c26d86ffcdfbc3ab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Activities of daily living</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adult Development</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Age Differences</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cognitive Appraisal</topic><topic>Ecological Momentary Assessment</topic><topic>Emotional Development</topic><topic>Emotional Experience</topic><topic>Emotional Regulation</topic><topic>Emotional Regulation - physiology</topic><topic>Emotional Response</topic><topic>Emotionality (Personality)</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Emotions - physiology</topic><topic>Everyday life</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Flexibility</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Human Development</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interpersonal Competence</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relations</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relationship</topic><topic>Intraindividual Variability</topic><topic>Life Span</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Pliability - physiology</topic><topic>Psychological Patterns</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Self Control</topic><topic>Social Interaction</topic><topic>Social situations</topic><topic>Strategies</topic><topic>Test Construction</topic><topic>Variability</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Benson, Lizbeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>English, Tammy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conroy, David E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pincus, Aaron L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerstorf, Denis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ram, Nilam</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Developmental psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Benson, Lizbeth</au><au>English, Tammy</au><au>Conroy, David E.</au><au>Pincus, Aaron L.</au><au>Gerstorf, Denis</au><au>Ram, Nilam</au><au>Pollak, Seth D</au><au>Camras, Linda A</au><au>Dubow, Eric F</au><au>Cole, Pamela M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1226553</ericid><atitle>Age Differences in Emotion Regulation Strategy Use, Variability, and Flexibility: An Experience Sampling Approach</atitle><jtitle>Developmental psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Dev Psychol</addtitle><date>2019-09-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1951</spage><epage>1964</epage><pages>1951-1964</pages><issn>0012-1649</issn><eissn>1939-0599</eissn><isbn>9781433892981</isbn><isbn>1433892987</isbn><abstract>Life span developmental theories suggest that as individuals age, they accumulate knowledge about how to deploy emotion regulation (ER) strategies effectively and learn how to match their ER strategy use with changes in situational demands. Using an event-contingent experience sampling design wherein 150 adults Age 18 to 89 years reported on 64,213 social interactions (M = 427.41, SD = 145.66) during 9 weeks of daily life, this study examines (a) age-related differences in individuals' usual ER strategy use (reappraisal, suppression) during everyday social interactions, (b) age-related differences in how much individuals' use of these two strategies varies across social situations-ER variability, and (c) age-related differences in the extent to which ER strategy use covaries with relational (close vs. nonclose others) and emotional (happy, sad) contextual features of those social situations-ER flexibility. In line with a small body of prior work, usual ER strategy use did not differ across adulthood and ER variability was lower at older ages. Results from multilevel models of intraindividual covariation suggested that individuals flexibly matched their ER strategy implementation to changes in emotional context-especially when interacting with close others. The results also provided evidence that the intraindividual covariation between relational context and use of suppression was weaker at older ages. Beyond these specific findings, this study demonstrated the utility of experience sampling designs, event-contingent reports, and the measurement/modeling of intraindividual variation and covariation for study of emotional development across the life span.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>31464497</pmid><doi>10.1037/dev0000727</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9895-5283</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-1649
ispartof Developmental psychology, 2019-09, Vol.55 (9), p.1951-1964
issn 0012-1649
1939-0599
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7189626
source APA PsycARTICLES; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Activities of daily living
Adolescent
Adult
Adult Development
Adults
Age
Age Differences
Age Factors
Aged
Cognitive Appraisal
Ecological Momentary Assessment
Emotional Development
Emotional Experience
Emotional Regulation
Emotional Regulation - physiology
Emotional Response
Emotionality (Personality)
Emotions
Emotions - physiology
Everyday life
Female
Flexibility
Human
Human Development
Humans
Interpersonal Competence
Interpersonal Relations
Interpersonal Relationship
Intraindividual Variability
Life Span
Male
Measurement
Middle Aged
Models, Statistical
Pliability - physiology
Psychological Patterns
Sampling
Self Control
Social Interaction
Social situations
Strategies
Test Construction
Variability
Young Adult
title Age Differences in Emotion Regulation Strategy Use, Variability, and Flexibility: An Experience Sampling Approach
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T00%3A29%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Age%20Differences%20in%20Emotion%20Regulation%20Strategy%20Use,%20Variability,%20and%20Flexibility:%20An%20Experience%20Sampling%20Approach&rft.jtitle=Developmental%20psychology&rft.au=Benson,%20Lizbeth&rft.date=2019-09-01&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1951&rft.epage=1964&rft.pages=1951-1964&rft.issn=0012-1649&rft.eissn=1939-0599&rft.isbn=9781433892981&rft.isbn_list=1433892987&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/dev0000727&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2282446740%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2281982765&rft_id=info:pmid/31464497&rft_ericid=EJ1226553&rfr_iscdi=true