Multigene Panel Testing Provides a New Perspective on Lynch Syndrome
Purpose Most existing literature describes Lynch syndrome (LS) as a hereditary syndrome leading to high risks of colorectal cancer (CRC) and endometrial cancer mainly as a result of mutations in MLH1 and MSH2. Most of these studies were performed on cohorts with disease suggestive of hereditary CRC...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical oncology 2017-08, Vol.35 (22), p.2568-2575 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2575 |
---|---|
container_issue | 22 |
container_start_page | 2568 |
container_title | Journal of clinical oncology |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Espenschied, Carin R LaDuca, Holly Li, Shuwei McFarland, Rachel Gau, Chia-Ling Hampel, Heather |
description | Purpose Most existing literature describes Lynch syndrome (LS) as a hereditary syndrome leading to high risks of colorectal cancer (CRC) and endometrial cancer mainly as a result of mutations in MLH1 and MSH2. Most of these studies were performed on cohorts with disease suggestive of hereditary CRC and population-based CRC and endometrial cancer cohorts, possibly biasing results. We aimed to describe a large cohort of mismatch repair (MMR) mutation carriers ascertained through multigene panel testing, evaluate their phenotype, and compare the results with those of previous studies. Methods We retrospectively reviewed clinical histories of patients who had multigene panel testing, including the MMR and EPCAM genes, between March 2012 and June 2015 (N = 34,981) and performed a series of statistical comparisons. Results Overall, MSH6 mutations were most frequent, followed by PMS2, MSH2, MLH1, and EPCAM mutations, respectively. Of 528 patients who had MMR mutations, 63 (11.9%) had breast cancer only and 144 (27.3%) had CRC only. When comparing those with breast cancer only to those with CRC only, MSH6 and PMS2 mutations were more frequent than MLH1 and MSH2 mutations ( P = 2.3 × 10
). Of the 528 patients, 22.2% met BRCA1 and BRCA2 ( BRCA1/2) testing criteria and not LS criteria, and 5.1% met neither BRCA1/2 nor LS testing criteria. MSH6 and PMS2 mutations were more frequent than MLH1 and MSH2 mutations among patients who met BRCA1/2 testing criteria but did not meet LS testing criteria ( P = 4.3 × 10
). Conclusion These results provide a new perspective on LS and suggest that individuals with MSH6 and PMS2 mutations may present with a hereditary breast and ovarian cancer phenotype. These data also highlight the limitations of current testing criteria in identifying these patients, as well as the need for further investigation of cancer risks in patients with MMR mutations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1200/JCO.2016.71.9260 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7186580</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1900125832</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-1461a629cfcefd5d3de9526cbe37c1c7e133a1fe95c4104de35eb0199e49a2873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkM1PwzAMxSMEYuPjzgnlyKUjTpqmvSCh8a3BJjEkblGWuqOoa0fSDe2_J9PGBCdLfs_P9o-QM2A94IxdPvWHPc4g6SnoZTxhe6QLkqtIKSn3SZcpwSNIxXuHHHn_yRjEqZCHpMNTCXEQuuTmeVG15RRrpCNTY0XH6NuyntKRa5Zljp4a-oLfdITOz9G25RJpU9PBqrYf9HVV566Z4Qk5KEzl8XRbj8nb3e24_xANhveP_etBZOOEtxHECZiEZ7awWOQyFzlmkid2gkJZsApBCANFaNoYWJyjkDhhkGUYZ4anShyTq03ufDGZYW6xbp2p9NyVM-NWujGl_q_U5YeeNkutIE1kykLAxTbANV-L8Kmeld5iVYXXm4XXkAVGXKaCByvbWK1rvHdY7NYA02v4OsDXa_ghXa_hh5Hzv-ftBn5pix8U1YC4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1900125832</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multigene Panel Testing Provides a New Perspective on Lynch Syndrome</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Society of Clinical Oncology Online Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Espenschied, Carin R ; LaDuca, Holly ; Li, Shuwei ; McFarland, Rachel ; Gau, Chia-Ling ; Hampel, Heather</creator><creatorcontrib>Espenschied, Carin R ; LaDuca, Holly ; Li, Shuwei ; McFarland, Rachel ; Gau, Chia-Ling ; Hampel, Heather</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Most existing literature describes Lynch syndrome (LS) as a hereditary syndrome leading to high risks of colorectal cancer (CRC) and endometrial cancer mainly as a result of mutations in MLH1 and MSH2. Most of these studies were performed on cohorts with disease suggestive of hereditary CRC and population-based CRC and endometrial cancer cohorts, possibly biasing results. We aimed to describe a large cohort of mismatch repair (MMR) mutation carriers ascertained through multigene panel testing, evaluate their phenotype, and compare the results with those of previous studies. Methods We retrospectively reviewed clinical histories of patients who had multigene panel testing, including the MMR and EPCAM genes, between March 2012 and June 2015 (N = 34,981) and performed a series of statistical comparisons. Results Overall, MSH6 mutations were most frequent, followed by PMS2, MSH2, MLH1, and EPCAM mutations, respectively. Of 528 patients who had MMR mutations, 63 (11.9%) had breast cancer only and 144 (27.3%) had CRC only. When comparing those with breast cancer only to those with CRC only, MSH6 and PMS2 mutations were more frequent than MLH1 and MSH2 mutations ( P = 2.3 × 10
). Of the 528 patients, 22.2% met BRCA1 and BRCA2 ( BRCA1/2) testing criteria and not LS criteria, and 5.1% met neither BRCA1/2 nor LS testing criteria. MSH6 and PMS2 mutations were more frequent than MLH1 and MSH2 mutations among patients who met BRCA1/2 testing criteria but did not meet LS testing criteria ( P = 4.3 × 10
). Conclusion These results provide a new perspective on LS and suggest that individuals with MSH6 and PMS2 mutations may present with a hereditary breast and ovarian cancer phenotype. These data also highlight the limitations of current testing criteria in identifying these patients, as well as the need for further investigation of cancer risks in patients with MMR mutations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0732-183X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-7755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2016.71.9260</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28514183</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society of Clinical Oncology</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Breast Neoplasms - genetics ; Child ; Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis - genetics ; DNA Mismatch Repair - genetics ; DNA Mutational Analysis ; DNA, Neoplasm - analysis ; DNA-Binding Proteins - genetics ; Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule - genetics ; Female ; Genes, BRCA1 ; Genes, BRCA2 ; Genetic Testing - methods ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Mismatch Repair Endonuclease PMS2 - genetics ; Mutation ; MutL Protein Homolog 1 - genetics ; MutS Homolog 2 Protein - genetics ; ORIGINAL REPORTS ; Phenotype ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical oncology, 2017-08, Vol.35 (22), p.2568-2575</ispartof><rights>2017 by American Society of Clinical Oncology 2017 American Society of Clinical Oncology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-1461a629cfcefd5d3de9526cbe37c1c7e133a1fe95c4104de35eb0199e49a2873</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-1461a629cfcefd5d3de9526cbe37c1c7e133a1fe95c4104de35eb0199e49a2873</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3716,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28514183$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Espenschied, Carin R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaDuca, Holly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Shuwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McFarland, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gau, Chia-Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hampel, Heather</creatorcontrib><title>Multigene Panel Testing Provides a New Perspective on Lynch Syndrome</title><title>Journal of clinical oncology</title><addtitle>J Clin Oncol</addtitle><description>Purpose Most existing literature describes Lynch syndrome (LS) as a hereditary syndrome leading to high risks of colorectal cancer (CRC) and endometrial cancer mainly as a result of mutations in MLH1 and MSH2. Most of these studies were performed on cohorts with disease suggestive of hereditary CRC and population-based CRC and endometrial cancer cohorts, possibly biasing results. We aimed to describe a large cohort of mismatch repair (MMR) mutation carriers ascertained through multigene panel testing, evaluate their phenotype, and compare the results with those of previous studies. Methods We retrospectively reviewed clinical histories of patients who had multigene panel testing, including the MMR and EPCAM genes, between March 2012 and June 2015 (N = 34,981) and performed a series of statistical comparisons. Results Overall, MSH6 mutations were most frequent, followed by PMS2, MSH2, MLH1, and EPCAM mutations, respectively. Of 528 patients who had MMR mutations, 63 (11.9%) had breast cancer only and 144 (27.3%) had CRC only. When comparing those with breast cancer only to those with CRC only, MSH6 and PMS2 mutations were more frequent than MLH1 and MSH2 mutations ( P = 2.3 × 10
). Of the 528 patients, 22.2% met BRCA1 and BRCA2 ( BRCA1/2) testing criteria and not LS criteria, and 5.1% met neither BRCA1/2 nor LS testing criteria. MSH6 and PMS2 mutations were more frequent than MLH1 and MSH2 mutations among patients who met BRCA1/2 testing criteria but did not meet LS testing criteria ( P = 4.3 × 10
). Conclusion These results provide a new perspective on LS and suggest that individuals with MSH6 and PMS2 mutations may present with a hereditary breast and ovarian cancer phenotype. These data also highlight the limitations of current testing criteria in identifying these patients, as well as the need for further investigation of cancer risks in patients with MMR mutations.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis - genetics</subject><subject>DNA Mismatch Repair - genetics</subject><subject>DNA Mutational Analysis</subject><subject>DNA, Neoplasm - analysis</subject><subject>DNA-Binding Proteins - genetics</subject><subject>Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule - genetics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genes, BRCA1</subject><subject>Genes, BRCA2</subject><subject>Genetic Testing - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mismatch Repair Endonuclease PMS2 - genetics</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>MutL Protein Homolog 1 - genetics</subject><subject>MutS Homolog 2 Protein - genetics</subject><subject>ORIGINAL REPORTS</subject><subject>Phenotype</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0732-183X</issn><issn>1527-7755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkM1PwzAMxSMEYuPjzgnlyKUjTpqmvSCh8a3BJjEkblGWuqOoa0fSDe2_J9PGBCdLfs_P9o-QM2A94IxdPvWHPc4g6SnoZTxhe6QLkqtIKSn3SZcpwSNIxXuHHHn_yRjEqZCHpMNTCXEQuuTmeVG15RRrpCNTY0XH6NuyntKRa5Zljp4a-oLfdITOz9G25RJpU9PBqrYf9HVV566Z4Qk5KEzl8XRbj8nb3e24_xANhveP_etBZOOEtxHECZiEZ7awWOQyFzlmkid2gkJZsApBCANFaNoYWJyjkDhhkGUYZ4anShyTq03ufDGZYW6xbp2p9NyVM-NWujGl_q_U5YeeNkutIE1kykLAxTbANV-L8Kmeld5iVYXXm4XXkAVGXKaCByvbWK1rvHdY7NYA02v4OsDXa_ghXa_hh5Hzv-ftBn5pix8U1YC4</recordid><startdate>20170801</startdate><enddate>20170801</enddate><creator>Espenschied, Carin R</creator><creator>LaDuca, Holly</creator><creator>Li, Shuwei</creator><creator>McFarland, Rachel</creator><creator>Gau, Chia-Ling</creator><creator>Hampel, Heather</creator><general>American Society of Clinical Oncology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170801</creationdate><title>Multigene Panel Testing Provides a New Perspective on Lynch Syndrome</title><author>Espenschied, Carin R ; LaDuca, Holly ; Li, Shuwei ; McFarland, Rachel ; Gau, Chia-Ling ; Hampel, Heather</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-1461a629cfcefd5d3de9526cbe37c1c7e133a1fe95c4104de35eb0199e49a2873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis - genetics</topic><topic>DNA Mismatch Repair - genetics</topic><topic>DNA Mutational Analysis</topic><topic>DNA, Neoplasm - analysis</topic><topic>DNA-Binding Proteins - genetics</topic><topic>Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule - genetics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genes, BRCA1</topic><topic>Genes, BRCA2</topic><topic>Genetic Testing - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mismatch Repair Endonuclease PMS2 - genetics</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>MutL Protein Homolog 1 - genetics</topic><topic>MutS Homolog 2 Protein - genetics</topic><topic>ORIGINAL REPORTS</topic><topic>Phenotype</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Espenschied, Carin R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaDuca, Holly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Shuwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McFarland, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gau, Chia-Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hampel, Heather</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Espenschied, Carin R</au><au>LaDuca, Holly</au><au>Li, Shuwei</au><au>McFarland, Rachel</au><au>Gau, Chia-Ling</au><au>Hampel, Heather</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multigene Panel Testing Provides a New Perspective on Lynch Syndrome</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Oncol</addtitle><date>2017-08-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>22</issue><spage>2568</spage><epage>2575</epage><pages>2568-2575</pages><issn>0732-183X</issn><eissn>1527-7755</eissn><abstract>Purpose Most existing literature describes Lynch syndrome (LS) as a hereditary syndrome leading to high risks of colorectal cancer (CRC) and endometrial cancer mainly as a result of mutations in MLH1 and MSH2. Most of these studies were performed on cohorts with disease suggestive of hereditary CRC and population-based CRC and endometrial cancer cohorts, possibly biasing results. We aimed to describe a large cohort of mismatch repair (MMR) mutation carriers ascertained through multigene panel testing, evaluate their phenotype, and compare the results with those of previous studies. Methods We retrospectively reviewed clinical histories of patients who had multigene panel testing, including the MMR and EPCAM genes, between March 2012 and June 2015 (N = 34,981) and performed a series of statistical comparisons. Results Overall, MSH6 mutations were most frequent, followed by PMS2, MSH2, MLH1, and EPCAM mutations, respectively. Of 528 patients who had MMR mutations, 63 (11.9%) had breast cancer only and 144 (27.3%) had CRC only. When comparing those with breast cancer only to those with CRC only, MSH6 and PMS2 mutations were more frequent than MLH1 and MSH2 mutations ( P = 2.3 × 10
). Of the 528 patients, 22.2% met BRCA1 and BRCA2 ( BRCA1/2) testing criteria and not LS criteria, and 5.1% met neither BRCA1/2 nor LS testing criteria. MSH6 and PMS2 mutations were more frequent than MLH1 and MSH2 mutations among patients who met BRCA1/2 testing criteria but did not meet LS testing criteria ( P = 4.3 × 10
). Conclusion These results provide a new perspective on LS and suggest that individuals with MSH6 and PMS2 mutations may present with a hereditary breast and ovarian cancer phenotype. These data also highlight the limitations of current testing criteria in identifying these patients, as well as the need for further investigation of cancer risks in patients with MMR mutations.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society of Clinical Oncology</pub><pmid>28514183</pmid><doi>10.1200/JCO.2016.71.9260</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0732-183X |
ispartof | Journal of clinical oncology, 2017-08, Vol.35 (22), p.2568-2575 |
issn | 0732-183X 1527-7755 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7186580 |
source | MEDLINE; American Society of Clinical Oncology Online Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Breast Neoplasms - genetics Child Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis - genetics DNA Mismatch Repair - genetics DNA Mutational Analysis DNA, Neoplasm - analysis DNA-Binding Proteins - genetics Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule - genetics Female Genes, BRCA1 Genes, BRCA2 Genetic Testing - methods Humans Male Middle Aged Mismatch Repair Endonuclease PMS2 - genetics Mutation MutL Protein Homolog 1 - genetics MutS Homolog 2 Protein - genetics ORIGINAL REPORTS Phenotype Retrospective Studies Risk Assessment Young Adult |
title | Multigene Panel Testing Provides a New Perspective on Lynch Syndrome |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T17%3A20%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multigene%20Panel%20Testing%20Provides%20a%20New%20Perspective%20on%20Lynch%20Syndrome&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20oncology&rft.au=Espenschied,%20Carin%20R&rft.date=2017-08-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=22&rft.spage=2568&rft.epage=2575&rft.pages=2568-2575&rft.issn=0732-183X&rft.eissn=1527-7755&rft_id=info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2016.71.9260&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1900125832%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1900125832&rft_id=info:pmid/28514183&rfr_iscdi=true |