Multigene Panel Testing Provides a New Perspective on Lynch Syndrome

Purpose Most existing literature describes Lynch syndrome (LS) as a hereditary syndrome leading to high risks of colorectal cancer (CRC) and endometrial cancer mainly as a result of mutations in MLH1 and MSH2. Most of these studies were performed on cohorts with disease suggestive of hereditary CRC...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical oncology 2017-08, Vol.35 (22), p.2568-2575
Hauptverfasser: Espenschied, Carin R, LaDuca, Holly, Li, Shuwei, McFarland, Rachel, Gau, Chia-Ling, Hampel, Heather
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2575
container_issue 22
container_start_page 2568
container_title Journal of clinical oncology
container_volume 35
creator Espenschied, Carin R
LaDuca, Holly
Li, Shuwei
McFarland, Rachel
Gau, Chia-Ling
Hampel, Heather
description Purpose Most existing literature describes Lynch syndrome (LS) as a hereditary syndrome leading to high risks of colorectal cancer (CRC) and endometrial cancer mainly as a result of mutations in MLH1 and MSH2. Most of these studies were performed on cohorts with disease suggestive of hereditary CRC and population-based CRC and endometrial cancer cohorts, possibly biasing results. We aimed to describe a large cohort of mismatch repair (MMR) mutation carriers ascertained through multigene panel testing, evaluate their phenotype, and compare the results with those of previous studies. Methods We retrospectively reviewed clinical histories of patients who had multigene panel testing, including the MMR and EPCAM genes, between March 2012 and June 2015 (N = 34,981) and performed a series of statistical comparisons. Results Overall, MSH6 mutations were most frequent, followed by PMS2, MSH2, MLH1, and EPCAM mutations, respectively. Of 528 patients who had MMR mutations, 63 (11.9%) had breast cancer only and 144 (27.3%) had CRC only. When comparing those with breast cancer only to those with CRC only, MSH6 and PMS2 mutations were more frequent than MLH1 and MSH2 mutations ( P = 2.3 × 10 ). Of the 528 patients, 22.2% met BRCA1 and BRCA2 ( BRCA1/2) testing criteria and not LS criteria, and 5.1% met neither BRCA1/2 nor LS testing criteria. MSH6 and PMS2 mutations were more frequent than MLH1 and MSH2 mutations among patients who met BRCA1/2 testing criteria but did not meet LS testing criteria ( P = 4.3 × 10 ). Conclusion These results provide a new perspective on LS and suggest that individuals with MSH6 and PMS2 mutations may present with a hereditary breast and ovarian cancer phenotype. These data also highlight the limitations of current testing criteria in identifying these patients, as well as the need for further investigation of cancer risks in patients with MMR mutations.
doi_str_mv 10.1200/JCO.2016.71.9260
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7186580</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1900125832</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-1461a629cfcefd5d3de9526cbe37c1c7e133a1fe95c4104de35eb0199e49a2873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkM1PwzAMxSMEYuPjzgnlyKUjTpqmvSCh8a3BJjEkblGWuqOoa0fSDe2_J9PGBCdLfs_P9o-QM2A94IxdPvWHPc4g6SnoZTxhe6QLkqtIKSn3SZcpwSNIxXuHHHn_yRjEqZCHpMNTCXEQuuTmeVG15RRrpCNTY0XH6NuyntKRa5Zljp4a-oLfdITOz9G25RJpU9PBqrYf9HVV566Z4Qk5KEzl8XRbj8nb3e24_xANhveP_etBZOOEtxHECZiEZ7awWOQyFzlmkid2gkJZsApBCANFaNoYWJyjkDhhkGUYZ4anShyTq03ufDGZYW6xbp2p9NyVM-NWujGl_q_U5YeeNkutIE1kykLAxTbANV-L8Kmeld5iVYXXm4XXkAVGXKaCByvbWK1rvHdY7NYA02v4OsDXa_ghXa_hh5Hzv-ftBn5pix8U1YC4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1900125832</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multigene Panel Testing Provides a New Perspective on Lynch Syndrome</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Society of Clinical Oncology Online Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Espenschied, Carin R ; LaDuca, Holly ; Li, Shuwei ; McFarland, Rachel ; Gau, Chia-Ling ; Hampel, Heather</creator><creatorcontrib>Espenschied, Carin R ; LaDuca, Holly ; Li, Shuwei ; McFarland, Rachel ; Gau, Chia-Ling ; Hampel, Heather</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Most existing literature describes Lynch syndrome (LS) as a hereditary syndrome leading to high risks of colorectal cancer (CRC) and endometrial cancer mainly as a result of mutations in MLH1 and MSH2. Most of these studies were performed on cohorts with disease suggestive of hereditary CRC and population-based CRC and endometrial cancer cohorts, possibly biasing results. We aimed to describe a large cohort of mismatch repair (MMR) mutation carriers ascertained through multigene panel testing, evaluate their phenotype, and compare the results with those of previous studies. Methods We retrospectively reviewed clinical histories of patients who had multigene panel testing, including the MMR and EPCAM genes, between March 2012 and June 2015 (N = 34,981) and performed a series of statistical comparisons. Results Overall, MSH6 mutations were most frequent, followed by PMS2, MSH2, MLH1, and EPCAM mutations, respectively. Of 528 patients who had MMR mutations, 63 (11.9%) had breast cancer only and 144 (27.3%) had CRC only. When comparing those with breast cancer only to those with CRC only, MSH6 and PMS2 mutations were more frequent than MLH1 and MSH2 mutations ( P = 2.3 × 10 ). Of the 528 patients, 22.2% met BRCA1 and BRCA2 ( BRCA1/2) testing criteria and not LS criteria, and 5.1% met neither BRCA1/2 nor LS testing criteria. MSH6 and PMS2 mutations were more frequent than MLH1 and MSH2 mutations among patients who met BRCA1/2 testing criteria but did not meet LS testing criteria ( P = 4.3 × 10 ). Conclusion These results provide a new perspective on LS and suggest that individuals with MSH6 and PMS2 mutations may present with a hereditary breast and ovarian cancer phenotype. These data also highlight the limitations of current testing criteria in identifying these patients, as well as the need for further investigation of cancer risks in patients with MMR mutations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0732-183X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-7755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2016.71.9260</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28514183</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society of Clinical Oncology</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Breast Neoplasms - genetics ; Child ; Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis - genetics ; DNA Mismatch Repair - genetics ; DNA Mutational Analysis ; DNA, Neoplasm - analysis ; DNA-Binding Proteins - genetics ; Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule - genetics ; Female ; Genes, BRCA1 ; Genes, BRCA2 ; Genetic Testing - methods ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Mismatch Repair Endonuclease PMS2 - genetics ; Mutation ; MutL Protein Homolog 1 - genetics ; MutS Homolog 2 Protein - genetics ; ORIGINAL REPORTS ; Phenotype ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical oncology, 2017-08, Vol.35 (22), p.2568-2575</ispartof><rights>2017 by American Society of Clinical Oncology 2017 American Society of Clinical Oncology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-1461a629cfcefd5d3de9526cbe37c1c7e133a1fe95c4104de35eb0199e49a2873</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-1461a629cfcefd5d3de9526cbe37c1c7e133a1fe95c4104de35eb0199e49a2873</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3716,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28514183$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Espenschied, Carin R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaDuca, Holly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Shuwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McFarland, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gau, Chia-Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hampel, Heather</creatorcontrib><title>Multigene Panel Testing Provides a New Perspective on Lynch Syndrome</title><title>Journal of clinical oncology</title><addtitle>J Clin Oncol</addtitle><description>Purpose Most existing literature describes Lynch syndrome (LS) as a hereditary syndrome leading to high risks of colorectal cancer (CRC) and endometrial cancer mainly as a result of mutations in MLH1 and MSH2. Most of these studies were performed on cohorts with disease suggestive of hereditary CRC and population-based CRC and endometrial cancer cohorts, possibly biasing results. We aimed to describe a large cohort of mismatch repair (MMR) mutation carriers ascertained through multigene panel testing, evaluate their phenotype, and compare the results with those of previous studies. Methods We retrospectively reviewed clinical histories of patients who had multigene panel testing, including the MMR and EPCAM genes, between March 2012 and June 2015 (N = 34,981) and performed a series of statistical comparisons. Results Overall, MSH6 mutations were most frequent, followed by PMS2, MSH2, MLH1, and EPCAM mutations, respectively. Of 528 patients who had MMR mutations, 63 (11.9%) had breast cancer only and 144 (27.3%) had CRC only. When comparing those with breast cancer only to those with CRC only, MSH6 and PMS2 mutations were more frequent than MLH1 and MSH2 mutations ( P = 2.3 × 10 ). Of the 528 patients, 22.2% met BRCA1 and BRCA2 ( BRCA1/2) testing criteria and not LS criteria, and 5.1% met neither BRCA1/2 nor LS testing criteria. MSH6 and PMS2 mutations were more frequent than MLH1 and MSH2 mutations among patients who met BRCA1/2 testing criteria but did not meet LS testing criteria ( P = 4.3 × 10 ). Conclusion These results provide a new perspective on LS and suggest that individuals with MSH6 and PMS2 mutations may present with a hereditary breast and ovarian cancer phenotype. These data also highlight the limitations of current testing criteria in identifying these patients, as well as the need for further investigation of cancer risks in patients with MMR mutations.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis - genetics</subject><subject>DNA Mismatch Repair - genetics</subject><subject>DNA Mutational Analysis</subject><subject>DNA, Neoplasm - analysis</subject><subject>DNA-Binding Proteins - genetics</subject><subject>Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule - genetics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genes, BRCA1</subject><subject>Genes, BRCA2</subject><subject>Genetic Testing - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mismatch Repair Endonuclease PMS2 - genetics</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>MutL Protein Homolog 1 - genetics</subject><subject>MutS Homolog 2 Protein - genetics</subject><subject>ORIGINAL REPORTS</subject><subject>Phenotype</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0732-183X</issn><issn>1527-7755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkM1PwzAMxSMEYuPjzgnlyKUjTpqmvSCh8a3BJjEkblGWuqOoa0fSDe2_J9PGBCdLfs_P9o-QM2A94IxdPvWHPc4g6SnoZTxhe6QLkqtIKSn3SZcpwSNIxXuHHHn_yRjEqZCHpMNTCXEQuuTmeVG15RRrpCNTY0XH6NuyntKRa5Zljp4a-oLfdITOz9G25RJpU9PBqrYf9HVV566Z4Qk5KEzl8XRbj8nb3e24_xANhveP_etBZOOEtxHECZiEZ7awWOQyFzlmkid2gkJZsApBCANFaNoYWJyjkDhhkGUYZ4anShyTq03ufDGZYW6xbp2p9NyVM-NWujGl_q_U5YeeNkutIE1kykLAxTbANV-L8Kmeld5iVYXXm4XXkAVGXKaCByvbWK1rvHdY7NYA02v4OsDXa_ghXa_hh5Hzv-ftBn5pix8U1YC4</recordid><startdate>20170801</startdate><enddate>20170801</enddate><creator>Espenschied, Carin R</creator><creator>LaDuca, Holly</creator><creator>Li, Shuwei</creator><creator>McFarland, Rachel</creator><creator>Gau, Chia-Ling</creator><creator>Hampel, Heather</creator><general>American Society of Clinical Oncology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170801</creationdate><title>Multigene Panel Testing Provides a New Perspective on Lynch Syndrome</title><author>Espenschied, Carin R ; LaDuca, Holly ; Li, Shuwei ; McFarland, Rachel ; Gau, Chia-Ling ; Hampel, Heather</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-1461a629cfcefd5d3de9526cbe37c1c7e133a1fe95c4104de35eb0199e49a2873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis - genetics</topic><topic>DNA Mismatch Repair - genetics</topic><topic>DNA Mutational Analysis</topic><topic>DNA, Neoplasm - analysis</topic><topic>DNA-Binding Proteins - genetics</topic><topic>Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule - genetics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genes, BRCA1</topic><topic>Genes, BRCA2</topic><topic>Genetic Testing - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mismatch Repair Endonuclease PMS2 - genetics</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>MutL Protein Homolog 1 - genetics</topic><topic>MutS Homolog 2 Protein - genetics</topic><topic>ORIGINAL REPORTS</topic><topic>Phenotype</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Espenschied, Carin R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaDuca, Holly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Shuwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McFarland, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gau, Chia-Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hampel, Heather</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Espenschied, Carin R</au><au>LaDuca, Holly</au><au>Li, Shuwei</au><au>McFarland, Rachel</au><au>Gau, Chia-Ling</au><au>Hampel, Heather</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multigene Panel Testing Provides a New Perspective on Lynch Syndrome</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Oncol</addtitle><date>2017-08-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>22</issue><spage>2568</spage><epage>2575</epage><pages>2568-2575</pages><issn>0732-183X</issn><eissn>1527-7755</eissn><abstract>Purpose Most existing literature describes Lynch syndrome (LS) as a hereditary syndrome leading to high risks of colorectal cancer (CRC) and endometrial cancer mainly as a result of mutations in MLH1 and MSH2. Most of these studies were performed on cohorts with disease suggestive of hereditary CRC and population-based CRC and endometrial cancer cohorts, possibly biasing results. We aimed to describe a large cohort of mismatch repair (MMR) mutation carriers ascertained through multigene panel testing, evaluate their phenotype, and compare the results with those of previous studies. Methods We retrospectively reviewed clinical histories of patients who had multigene panel testing, including the MMR and EPCAM genes, between March 2012 and June 2015 (N = 34,981) and performed a series of statistical comparisons. Results Overall, MSH6 mutations were most frequent, followed by PMS2, MSH2, MLH1, and EPCAM mutations, respectively. Of 528 patients who had MMR mutations, 63 (11.9%) had breast cancer only and 144 (27.3%) had CRC only. When comparing those with breast cancer only to those with CRC only, MSH6 and PMS2 mutations were more frequent than MLH1 and MSH2 mutations ( P = 2.3 × 10 ). Of the 528 patients, 22.2% met BRCA1 and BRCA2 ( BRCA1/2) testing criteria and not LS criteria, and 5.1% met neither BRCA1/2 nor LS testing criteria. MSH6 and PMS2 mutations were more frequent than MLH1 and MSH2 mutations among patients who met BRCA1/2 testing criteria but did not meet LS testing criteria ( P = 4.3 × 10 ). Conclusion These results provide a new perspective on LS and suggest that individuals with MSH6 and PMS2 mutations may present with a hereditary breast and ovarian cancer phenotype. These data also highlight the limitations of current testing criteria in identifying these patients, as well as the need for further investigation of cancer risks in patients with MMR mutations.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society of Clinical Oncology</pub><pmid>28514183</pmid><doi>10.1200/JCO.2016.71.9260</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0732-183X
ispartof Journal of clinical oncology, 2017-08, Vol.35 (22), p.2568-2575
issn 0732-183X
1527-7755
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7186580
source MEDLINE; American Society of Clinical Oncology Online Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Breast Neoplasms - genetics
Child
Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis - genetics
DNA Mismatch Repair - genetics
DNA Mutational Analysis
DNA, Neoplasm - analysis
DNA-Binding Proteins - genetics
Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule - genetics
Female
Genes, BRCA1
Genes, BRCA2
Genetic Testing - methods
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Mismatch Repair Endonuclease PMS2 - genetics
Mutation
MutL Protein Homolog 1 - genetics
MutS Homolog 2 Protein - genetics
ORIGINAL REPORTS
Phenotype
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Young Adult
title Multigene Panel Testing Provides a New Perspective on Lynch Syndrome
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T17%3A20%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multigene%20Panel%20Testing%20Provides%20a%20New%20Perspective%20on%20Lynch%20Syndrome&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20oncology&rft.au=Espenschied,%20Carin%20R&rft.date=2017-08-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=22&rft.spage=2568&rft.epage=2575&rft.pages=2568-2575&rft.issn=0732-183X&rft.eissn=1527-7755&rft_id=info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2016.71.9260&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1900125832%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1900125832&rft_id=info:pmid/28514183&rfr_iscdi=true