The effect of intranasal nedocromil sodium on viral upper respiratory tract infections in human volunteers

Summary Two studies involving double‐blind group comparative trials in human volunteers compared the effects of intranasal nedocromil sodium (2·6 mg active drug per nostril, q.i.d.) with placebo on clinical symptoms and performance impairment associated with the common cold. In the first study volun...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical and experimental allergy 1990-01, Vol.20 (1), p.45-51
Hauptverfasser: BARROW, G. I., HIGGINS, P. G., AL-NAKIB, W., SMITH, A. P., WENHAM, R. B. M., TYRRELL, D. A. J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 51
container_issue 1
container_start_page 45
container_title Clinical and experimental allergy
container_volume 20
creator BARROW, G. I.
HIGGINS, P. G.
AL-NAKIB, W.
SMITH, A. P.
WENHAM, R. B. M.
TYRRELL, D. A. J.
description Summary Two studies involving double‐blind group comparative trials in human volunteers compared the effects of intranasal nedocromil sodium (2·6 mg active drug per nostril, q.i.d.) with placebo on clinical symptoms and performance impairment associated with the common cold. In the first study volunteers were challenged with rhinoviruses (RV9 and RV14), and in the second study with respiratory coronavirus. In both studies, active and placebo groups of volunteers were demographically similar. Infection rates in both groups were also similar. There were no withdrawals resulting from unusual symptoms related to either treatment. In the rhinovirus study (19, placebo; 20, nedocromil sodium) daily symptom scores and daily mean nasal secretion weights were significantly lower in the nedocromil sodium‐treated group. In the coronavirus study (26, placebo; 27, nedocromil sodium) there was little difference in the severity of colds between the active and placebo‐treated groups, but trends favoured nedocromil sodium. In both studies the impairment of performance in volunteers who developed a cold was significantly less in those treated with nedocromil sodium than in those treated with placebo.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1990.tb02774.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7185334</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79656134</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5735-6ef80ce63b375bca46a754a416d6379df8d565255565fdbd31da54e85bcddfd63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkVuL1DAYhoMo67j6E4Qi4l1r0pwaQWEd1lVYD8iqlyFtEidj29SkXWf-vSlTit5pbpLwHsiXB4AnCBYoref7AmFG8zKtAgkBi7GGJeekONwBm1W6CzZQUJLzSpD74EGMewghpqI6A2clopRV1Qbsb3YmM9aaZsy8zVw_BtWrqNqsN9o3wXeuzaLXbuoy32e3LiRpGgYTsmDikK6jD8cspVKB6-ce5_uYjtlu6lRK-HbqR2NCfAjuWdVG82jZz8GXN5c327f59cerd9uL67yhHNOcGVvBxjBcY07rRhGmOCWKIKYZ5kLbSlNGS5oGoFbXGiOtKDFV8mptk-ccvDr1DlPdGd2YeaZWDsF1KhylV07-rfRuJ7_7W8lRRTEmqeDZUhD8z8nEUXYuNqZtVW_8FCUXjDL0D0ZECeWQlcn44mRMHxpjMHZ9DYJyRir3cuYmZ25yRioXpPKQwo__nGeNLgyT_nTRVWxUaxPAxsXVRiiCTIhke3my_XKtOf7HA-T28oLQlM9PeRdHc1jzKvyQjCdU8tuHK_m5fP9afNp-lQT_BqLu0Ik</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15457062</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of intranasal nedocromil sodium on viral upper respiratory tract infections in human volunteers</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>BARROW, G. I. ; HIGGINS, P. G. ; AL-NAKIB, W. ; SMITH, A. P. ; WENHAM, R. B. M. ; TYRRELL, D. A. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>BARROW, G. I. ; HIGGINS, P. G. ; AL-NAKIB, W. ; SMITH, A. P. ; WENHAM, R. B. M. ; TYRRELL, D. A. J.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Two studies involving double‐blind group comparative trials in human volunteers compared the effects of intranasal nedocromil sodium (2·6 mg active drug per nostril, q.i.d.) with placebo on clinical symptoms and performance impairment associated with the common cold. In the first study volunteers were challenged with rhinoviruses (RV9 and RV14), and in the second study with respiratory coronavirus. In both studies, active and placebo groups of volunteers were demographically similar. Infection rates in both groups were also similar. There were no withdrawals resulting from unusual symptoms related to either treatment. In the rhinovirus study (19, placebo; 20, nedocromil sodium) daily symptom scores and daily mean nasal secretion weights were significantly lower in the nedocromil sodium‐treated group. In the coronavirus study (26, placebo; 27, nedocromil sodium) there was little difference in the severity of colds between the active and placebo‐treated groups, but trends favoured nedocromil sodium. In both studies the impairment of performance in volunteers who developed a cold was significantly less in those treated with nedocromil sodium than in those treated with placebo.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0954-7894</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2222</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1990.tb02774.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2155688</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Administration, Intranasal ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Common Cold - drug therapy ; Coronaviridae Infections - drug therapy ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Humans ; Infectious diseases ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Nedocromil ; Picornaviridae Infections - drug therapy ; Quinolones - administration &amp; dosage ; Quinolones - therapeutic use ; Random Allocation ; Rhinovirus ; Viral diseases</subject><ispartof>Clinical and experimental allergy, 1990-01, Vol.20 (1), p.45-51</ispartof><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5735-6ef80ce63b375bca46a754a416d6379df8d565255565fdbd31da54e85bcddfd63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5735-6ef80ce63b375bca46a754a416d6379df8d565255565fdbd31da54e85bcddfd63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2222.1990.tb02774.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2222.1990.tb02774.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,1418,4025,27928,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=4510699$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2155688$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BARROW, G. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HIGGINS, P. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AL-NAKIB, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SMITH, A. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WENHAM, R. B. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TYRRELL, D. A. J.</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of intranasal nedocromil sodium on viral upper respiratory tract infections in human volunteers</title><title>Clinical and experimental allergy</title><addtitle>Clin Exp Allergy</addtitle><description>Summary Two studies involving double‐blind group comparative trials in human volunteers compared the effects of intranasal nedocromil sodium (2·6 mg active drug per nostril, q.i.d.) with placebo on clinical symptoms and performance impairment associated with the common cold. In the first study volunteers were challenged with rhinoviruses (RV9 and RV14), and in the second study with respiratory coronavirus. In both studies, active and placebo groups of volunteers were demographically similar. Infection rates in both groups were also similar. There were no withdrawals resulting from unusual symptoms related to either treatment. In the rhinovirus study (19, placebo; 20, nedocromil sodium) daily symptom scores and daily mean nasal secretion weights were significantly lower in the nedocromil sodium‐treated group. In the coronavirus study (26, placebo; 27, nedocromil sodium) there was little difference in the severity of colds between the active and placebo‐treated groups, but trends favoured nedocromil sodium. In both studies the impairment of performance in volunteers who developed a cold was significantly less in those treated with nedocromil sodium than in those treated with placebo.</description><subject>Administration, Intranasal</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Common Cold - drug therapy</subject><subject>Coronaviridae Infections - drug therapy</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nedocromil</subject><subject>Picornaviridae Infections - drug therapy</subject><subject>Quinolones - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Quinolones - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>Rhinovirus</subject><subject>Viral diseases</subject><issn>0954-7894</issn><issn>1365-2222</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkVuL1DAYhoMo67j6E4Qi4l1r0pwaQWEd1lVYD8iqlyFtEidj29SkXWf-vSlTit5pbpLwHsiXB4AnCBYoref7AmFG8zKtAgkBi7GGJeekONwBm1W6CzZQUJLzSpD74EGMewghpqI6A2clopRV1Qbsb3YmM9aaZsy8zVw_BtWrqNqsN9o3wXeuzaLXbuoy32e3LiRpGgYTsmDikK6jD8cspVKB6-ce5_uYjtlu6lRK-HbqR2NCfAjuWdVG82jZz8GXN5c327f59cerd9uL67yhHNOcGVvBxjBcY07rRhGmOCWKIKYZ5kLbSlNGS5oGoFbXGiOtKDFV8mptk-ccvDr1DlPdGd2YeaZWDsF1KhylV07-rfRuJ7_7W8lRRTEmqeDZUhD8z8nEUXYuNqZtVW_8FCUXjDL0D0ZECeWQlcn44mRMHxpjMHZ9DYJyRir3cuYmZ25yRioXpPKQwo__nGeNLgyT_nTRVWxUaxPAxsXVRiiCTIhke3my_XKtOf7HA-T28oLQlM9PeRdHc1jzKvyQjCdU8tuHK_m5fP9afNp-lQT_BqLu0Ik</recordid><startdate>199001</startdate><enddate>199001</enddate><creator>BARROW, G. I.</creator><creator>HIGGINS, P. G.</creator><creator>AL-NAKIB, W.</creator><creator>SMITH, A. P.</creator><creator>WENHAM, R. B. M.</creator><creator>TYRRELL, D. A. J.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199001</creationdate><title>The effect of intranasal nedocromil sodium on viral upper respiratory tract infections in human volunteers</title><author>BARROW, G. I. ; HIGGINS, P. G. ; AL-NAKIB, W. ; SMITH, A. P. ; WENHAM, R. B. M. ; TYRRELL, D. A. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5735-6ef80ce63b375bca46a754a416d6379df8d565255565fdbd31da54e85bcddfd63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Administration, Intranasal</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Common Cold - drug therapy</topic><topic>Coronaviridae Infections - drug therapy</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nedocromil</topic><topic>Picornaviridae Infections - drug therapy</topic><topic>Quinolones - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Quinolones - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>Rhinovirus</topic><topic>Viral diseases</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BARROW, G. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HIGGINS, P. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AL-NAKIB, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SMITH, A. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WENHAM, R. B. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TYRRELL, D. A. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Clinical and experimental allergy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BARROW, G. I.</au><au>HIGGINS, P. G.</au><au>AL-NAKIB, W.</au><au>SMITH, A. P.</au><au>WENHAM, R. B. M.</au><au>TYRRELL, D. A. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of intranasal nedocromil sodium on viral upper respiratory tract infections in human volunteers</atitle><jtitle>Clinical and experimental allergy</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Exp Allergy</addtitle><date>1990-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>45</spage><epage>51</epage><pages>45-51</pages><issn>0954-7894</issn><eissn>1365-2222</eissn><abstract>Summary Two studies involving double‐blind group comparative trials in human volunteers compared the effects of intranasal nedocromil sodium (2·6 mg active drug per nostril, q.i.d.) with placebo on clinical symptoms and performance impairment associated with the common cold. In the first study volunteers were challenged with rhinoviruses (RV9 and RV14), and in the second study with respiratory coronavirus. In both studies, active and placebo groups of volunteers were demographically similar. Infection rates in both groups were also similar. There were no withdrawals resulting from unusual symptoms related to either treatment. In the rhinovirus study (19, placebo; 20, nedocromil sodium) daily symptom scores and daily mean nasal secretion weights were significantly lower in the nedocromil sodium‐treated group. In the coronavirus study (26, placebo; 27, nedocromil sodium) there was little difference in the severity of colds between the active and placebo‐treated groups, but trends favoured nedocromil sodium. In both studies the impairment of performance in volunteers who developed a cold was significantly less in those treated with nedocromil sodium than in those treated with placebo.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>2155688</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2222.1990.tb02774.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0954-7894
ispartof Clinical and experimental allergy, 1990-01, Vol.20 (1), p.45-51
issn 0954-7894
1365-2222
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7185334
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Administration, Intranasal
Adolescent
Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Common Cold - drug therapy
Coronaviridae Infections - drug therapy
Double-Blind Method
Female
Humans
Infectious diseases
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Nedocromil
Picornaviridae Infections - drug therapy
Quinolones - administration & dosage
Quinolones - therapeutic use
Random Allocation
Rhinovirus
Viral diseases
title The effect of intranasal nedocromil sodium on viral upper respiratory tract infections in human volunteers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T16%3A00%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20intranasal%20nedocromil%20sodium%20on%20viral%20upper%20respiratory%20tract%20infections%20in%20human%20volunteers&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20and%20experimental%20allergy&rft.au=BARROW,%20G.%20I.&rft.date=1990-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=45&rft.epage=51&rft.pages=45-51&rft.issn=0954-7894&rft.eissn=1365-2222&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2222.1990.tb02774.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E79656134%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15457062&rft_id=info:pmid/2155688&rfr_iscdi=true