Evaluation of a Deep Neural Network for Automated Classification of Colorectal Polyps on Histopathologic Slides
Histologic classification of colorectal polyps plays a critical role in screening for colorectal cancer and care of affected patients. An accurate and automated algorithm for the classification of colorectal polyps on digitized histopathologic slides could benefit practitioners and patients. To eval...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | JAMA network open 2020-04, Vol.3 (4), p.e203398-e203398 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e203398 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | e203398 |
container_title | JAMA network open |
container_volume | 3 |
creator | Wei, Jason W Suriawinata, Arief A Vaickus, Louis J Ren, Bing Liu, Xiaoying Lisovsky, Mikhail Tomita, Naofumi Abdollahi, Behnaz Kim, Adam S Snover, Dale C Baron, John A Barry, Elizabeth L Hassanpour, Saeed |
description | Histologic classification of colorectal polyps plays a critical role in screening for colorectal cancer and care of affected patients. An accurate and automated algorithm for the classification of colorectal polyps on digitized histopathologic slides could benefit practitioners and patients.
To evaluate the performance and generalizability of a deep neural network for colorectal polyp classification on histopathologic slide images using a multi-institutional data set.
This prognostic study used histopathologic slides collected from January 1, 2016, to June 31, 2016, from Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, with 326 slides used for training, 157 slides for an internal data set, and 25 for a validation set. For the external data set, 238 slides for 179 distinct patients were obtained from 24 institutions across 13 US states. Data analysis was performed from April 9 to November 23, 2019.
Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the model to classify 4 major colorectal polyp types: tubular adenoma, tubulovillous or villous adenoma, hyperplastic polyp, and sessile serrated adenoma. Performance was compared with that of local pathologists' at the point of care identified from corresponding pathology laboratories.
For the internal evaluation on the 157 slides with ground truth labels from 5 pathologists, the deep neural network had a mean accuracy of 93.5% (95% CI, 89.6%-97.4%) compared with local pathologists' accuracy of 91.4% (95% CI, 87.0%-95.8%). On the external test set of 238 slides with ground truth labels from 5 pathologists, the deep neural network achieved an accuracy of 87.0% (95% CI, 82.7%-91.3%), which was comparable with local pathologists' accuracy of 86.6% (95% CI, 82.3%-90.9%).
The findings suggest that this model may assist pathologists by improving the diagnostic efficiency, reproducibility, and accuracy of colorectal cancer screenings. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3398 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7180424</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2668404209</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-ba6881fe8d7a8becb6aa6bf25e5ea5c7803616719315156e09ba5a16eb148b143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkV9vFCEUxYnR2Kb2KxiML77syp-BYV5MmrVak0ZN1Gdyh73TsjLDCExNv72srZvaB3IJ93cOXA4hrzhbc8b42x2MMGH5HdPPOOO0FkywtZSdeUKOhWqblTRMPX2wPyKnOe8YqxyXnVbPyZEUUjRCtscknt9AWKD4ONE4UKDvEWf6GZcEoZa_19AhJnq2lDhCwS3dBMjZD94dVJsYYkJXquRrDLdzpvX8wucSZyjXtXnlHf0W_BbzC_JsgJDx9L6ekB8fzr9vLlaXXz5-2pxdrlyjeFn1oI3hA5ptC6ZH12sA3Q9CoUJQrjVMaq5b3kmuuNLIuh4UcI09b0xd8oS8u_Odl37ErcOp1InsnPwI6dZG8Pb_zuSv7VW8sS03rBF7gzf3Bin-WjAXO_rsMIT6-XHJVsiuYkp1qqKvH6G7uKSpjmeF1qapfqyrVHdHuRRzTjgcHsOZ3SdrHyVr98nafbJV-_LhNAflvxzlH1zDppY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2668404209</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of a Deep Neural Network for Automated Classification of Colorectal Polyps on Histopathologic Slides</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Wei, Jason W ; Suriawinata, Arief A ; Vaickus, Louis J ; Ren, Bing ; Liu, Xiaoying ; Lisovsky, Mikhail ; Tomita, Naofumi ; Abdollahi, Behnaz ; Kim, Adam S ; Snover, Dale C ; Baron, John A ; Barry, Elizabeth L ; Hassanpour, Saeed</creator><creatorcontrib>Wei, Jason W ; Suriawinata, Arief A ; Vaickus, Louis J ; Ren, Bing ; Liu, Xiaoying ; Lisovsky, Mikhail ; Tomita, Naofumi ; Abdollahi, Behnaz ; Kim, Adam S ; Snover, Dale C ; Baron, John A ; Barry, Elizabeth L ; Hassanpour, Saeed</creatorcontrib><description>Histologic classification of colorectal polyps plays a critical role in screening for colorectal cancer and care of affected patients. An accurate and automated algorithm for the classification of colorectal polyps on digitized histopathologic slides could benefit practitioners and patients.
To evaluate the performance and generalizability of a deep neural network for colorectal polyp classification on histopathologic slide images using a multi-institutional data set.
This prognostic study used histopathologic slides collected from January 1, 2016, to June 31, 2016, from Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, with 326 slides used for training, 157 slides for an internal data set, and 25 for a validation set. For the external data set, 238 slides for 179 distinct patients were obtained from 24 institutions across 13 US states. Data analysis was performed from April 9 to November 23, 2019.
Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the model to classify 4 major colorectal polyp types: tubular adenoma, tubulovillous or villous adenoma, hyperplastic polyp, and sessile serrated adenoma. Performance was compared with that of local pathologists' at the point of care identified from corresponding pathology laboratories.
For the internal evaluation on the 157 slides with ground truth labels from 5 pathologists, the deep neural network had a mean accuracy of 93.5% (95% CI, 89.6%-97.4%) compared with local pathologists' accuracy of 91.4% (95% CI, 87.0%-95.8%). On the external test set of 238 slides with ground truth labels from 5 pathologists, the deep neural network achieved an accuracy of 87.0% (95% CI, 82.7%-91.3%), which was comparable with local pathologists' accuracy of 86.6% (95% CI, 82.3%-90.9%).
The findings suggest that this model may assist pathologists by improving the diagnostic efficiency, reproducibility, and accuracy of colorectal cancer screenings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2574-3805</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2574-3805</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3398</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32324237</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Medical Association</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Automation ; Classification ; Colorectal cancer ; Datasets ; Health Informatics ; Neural networks ; Online Only ; Original Investigation ; Performance evaluation ; Polyps ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>JAMA network open, 2020-04, Vol.3 (4), p.e203398-e203398</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright 2020 Wei JW et al. .</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-ba6881fe8d7a8becb6aa6bf25e5ea5c7803616719315156e09ba5a16eb148b143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-ba6881fe8d7a8becb6aa6bf25e5ea5c7803616719315156e09ba5a16eb148b143</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,864,885,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32324237$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wei, Jason W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suriawinata, Arief A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaickus, Louis J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Bing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xiaoying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lisovsky, Mikhail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomita, Naofumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdollahi, Behnaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Adam S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snover, Dale C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baron, John A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barry, Elizabeth L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassanpour, Saeed</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of a Deep Neural Network for Automated Classification of Colorectal Polyps on Histopathologic Slides</title><title>JAMA network open</title><addtitle>JAMA Netw Open</addtitle><description>Histologic classification of colorectal polyps plays a critical role in screening for colorectal cancer and care of affected patients. An accurate and automated algorithm for the classification of colorectal polyps on digitized histopathologic slides could benefit practitioners and patients.
To evaluate the performance and generalizability of a deep neural network for colorectal polyp classification on histopathologic slide images using a multi-institutional data set.
This prognostic study used histopathologic slides collected from January 1, 2016, to June 31, 2016, from Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, with 326 slides used for training, 157 slides for an internal data set, and 25 for a validation set. For the external data set, 238 slides for 179 distinct patients were obtained from 24 institutions across 13 US states. Data analysis was performed from April 9 to November 23, 2019.
Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the model to classify 4 major colorectal polyp types: tubular adenoma, tubulovillous or villous adenoma, hyperplastic polyp, and sessile serrated adenoma. Performance was compared with that of local pathologists' at the point of care identified from corresponding pathology laboratories.
For the internal evaluation on the 157 slides with ground truth labels from 5 pathologists, the deep neural network had a mean accuracy of 93.5% (95% CI, 89.6%-97.4%) compared with local pathologists' accuracy of 91.4% (95% CI, 87.0%-95.8%). On the external test set of 238 slides with ground truth labels from 5 pathologists, the deep neural network achieved an accuracy of 87.0% (95% CI, 82.7%-91.3%), which was comparable with local pathologists' accuracy of 86.6% (95% CI, 82.3%-90.9%).
The findings suggest that this model may assist pathologists by improving the diagnostic efficiency, reproducibility, and accuracy of colorectal cancer screenings.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Health Informatics</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Online Only</subject><subject>Original Investigation</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Polyps</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>2574-3805</issn><issn>2574-3805</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkV9vFCEUxYnR2Kb2KxiML77syp-BYV5MmrVak0ZN1Gdyh73TsjLDCExNv72srZvaB3IJ93cOXA4hrzhbc8b42x2MMGH5HdPPOOO0FkywtZSdeUKOhWqblTRMPX2wPyKnOe8YqxyXnVbPyZEUUjRCtscknt9AWKD4ONE4UKDvEWf6GZcEoZa_19AhJnq2lDhCwS3dBMjZD94dVJsYYkJXquRrDLdzpvX8wucSZyjXtXnlHf0W_BbzC_JsgJDx9L6ekB8fzr9vLlaXXz5-2pxdrlyjeFn1oI3hA5ptC6ZH12sA3Q9CoUJQrjVMaq5b3kmuuNLIuh4UcI09b0xd8oS8u_Odl37ErcOp1InsnPwI6dZG8Pb_zuSv7VW8sS03rBF7gzf3Bin-WjAXO_rsMIT6-XHJVsiuYkp1qqKvH6G7uKSpjmeF1qapfqyrVHdHuRRzTjgcHsOZ3SdrHyVr98nafbJV-_LhNAflvxzlH1zDppY</recordid><startdate>20200423</startdate><enddate>20200423</enddate><creator>Wei, Jason W</creator><creator>Suriawinata, Arief A</creator><creator>Vaickus, Louis J</creator><creator>Ren, Bing</creator><creator>Liu, Xiaoying</creator><creator>Lisovsky, Mikhail</creator><creator>Tomita, Naofumi</creator><creator>Abdollahi, Behnaz</creator><creator>Kim, Adam S</creator><creator>Snover, Dale C</creator><creator>Baron, John A</creator><creator>Barry, Elizabeth L</creator><creator>Hassanpour, Saeed</creator><general>American Medical Association</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200423</creationdate><title>Evaluation of a Deep Neural Network for Automated Classification of Colorectal Polyps on Histopathologic Slides</title><author>Wei, Jason W ; Suriawinata, Arief A ; Vaickus, Louis J ; Ren, Bing ; Liu, Xiaoying ; Lisovsky, Mikhail ; Tomita, Naofumi ; Abdollahi, Behnaz ; Kim, Adam S ; Snover, Dale C ; Baron, John A ; Barry, Elizabeth L ; Hassanpour, Saeed</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-ba6881fe8d7a8becb6aa6bf25e5ea5c7803616719315156e09ba5a16eb148b143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Health Informatics</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Online Only</topic><topic>Original Investigation</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Polyps</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wei, Jason W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suriawinata, Arief A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaickus, Louis J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Bing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xiaoying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lisovsky, Mikhail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomita, Naofumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdollahi, Behnaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Adam S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snover, Dale C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baron, John A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barry, Elizabeth L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassanpour, Saeed</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>JAMA network open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wei, Jason W</au><au>Suriawinata, Arief A</au><au>Vaickus, Louis J</au><au>Ren, Bing</au><au>Liu, Xiaoying</au><au>Lisovsky, Mikhail</au><au>Tomita, Naofumi</au><au>Abdollahi, Behnaz</au><au>Kim, Adam S</au><au>Snover, Dale C</au><au>Baron, John A</au><au>Barry, Elizabeth L</au><au>Hassanpour, Saeed</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of a Deep Neural Network for Automated Classification of Colorectal Polyps on Histopathologic Slides</atitle><jtitle>JAMA network open</jtitle><addtitle>JAMA Netw Open</addtitle><date>2020-04-23</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e203398</spage><epage>e203398</epage><pages>e203398-e203398</pages><issn>2574-3805</issn><eissn>2574-3805</eissn><abstract>Histologic classification of colorectal polyps plays a critical role in screening for colorectal cancer and care of affected patients. An accurate and automated algorithm for the classification of colorectal polyps on digitized histopathologic slides could benefit practitioners and patients.
To evaluate the performance and generalizability of a deep neural network for colorectal polyp classification on histopathologic slide images using a multi-institutional data set.
This prognostic study used histopathologic slides collected from January 1, 2016, to June 31, 2016, from Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, with 326 slides used for training, 157 slides for an internal data set, and 25 for a validation set. For the external data set, 238 slides for 179 distinct patients were obtained from 24 institutions across 13 US states. Data analysis was performed from April 9 to November 23, 2019.
Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the model to classify 4 major colorectal polyp types: tubular adenoma, tubulovillous or villous adenoma, hyperplastic polyp, and sessile serrated adenoma. Performance was compared with that of local pathologists' at the point of care identified from corresponding pathology laboratories.
For the internal evaluation on the 157 slides with ground truth labels from 5 pathologists, the deep neural network had a mean accuracy of 93.5% (95% CI, 89.6%-97.4%) compared with local pathologists' accuracy of 91.4% (95% CI, 87.0%-95.8%). On the external test set of 238 slides with ground truth labels from 5 pathologists, the deep neural network achieved an accuracy of 87.0% (95% CI, 82.7%-91.3%), which was comparable with local pathologists' accuracy of 86.6% (95% CI, 82.3%-90.9%).
The findings suggest that this model may assist pathologists by improving the diagnostic efficiency, reproducibility, and accuracy of colorectal cancer screenings.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Medical Association</pub><pmid>32324237</pmid><doi>10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3398</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2574-3805 |
ispartof | JAMA network open, 2020-04, Vol.3 (4), p.e203398-e203398 |
issn | 2574-3805 2574-3805 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7180424 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Accuracy Automation Classification Colorectal cancer Datasets Health Informatics Neural networks Online Only Original Investigation Performance evaluation Polyps Tumors |
title | Evaluation of a Deep Neural Network for Automated Classification of Colorectal Polyps on Histopathologic Slides |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T19%3A56%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20a%20Deep%20Neural%20Network%20for%20Automated%20Classification%20of%20Colorectal%20Polyps%20on%20Histopathologic%20Slides&rft.jtitle=JAMA%20network%20open&rft.au=Wei,%20Jason%20W&rft.date=2020-04-23&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e203398&rft.epage=e203398&rft.pages=e203398-e203398&rft.issn=2574-3805&rft.eissn=2574-3805&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3398&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2668404209%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2668404209&rft_id=info:pmid/32324237&rfr_iscdi=true |