Association between use of urgent suspected cancer referral and mortality and stage at diagnosis: a 5-year national cohort study

There is considerable variation between GP practices in England in their use of urgent referral pathways for suspected cancer. To determine the association between practice use of urgent referral and cancer stage at diagnosis and cancer patient mortality, for all cancers and the most common types of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of general practice 2020-06, Vol.70 (695), p.e389-e398
Hauptverfasser: Round, Thomas, Gildea, Carolynn, Ashworth, Mark, Møller, Henrik
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e398
container_issue 695
container_start_page e389
container_title British journal of general practice
container_volume 70
creator Round, Thomas
Gildea, Carolynn
Ashworth, Mark
Møller, Henrik
description There is considerable variation between GP practices in England in their use of urgent referral pathways for suspected cancer. To determine the association between practice use of urgent referral and cancer stage at diagnosis and cancer patient mortality, for all cancers and the most common types of cancer (colorectal, lung, breast, and prostate). National cohort study of 1.4 million patients diagnosed with cancer in England between 2011 and 2015. The cohort was stratified according to quintiles of urgent referral metrics. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to quantify risk of death, and logistic regression to calculate odds of late-stage (III/IV) versus early-stage (I/II) cancers in relation to referral quintiles and cancer type. Cancer patients from the highest referring practices had a lower hazard of death (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.95 to 0.97), with similar patterns for individual cancers: colorectal (HR = 0.95; CI = 0.93 to 0.97); lung (HR = 0.95; CI = 0.94 to 0.97); breast (HR = 0.96; CI = 0.93 to 0.99); and prostate (HR = 0.88; CI = 0.85 to 0.91). Similarly, for cancer patients from these practices, there were lower odds of late-stage diagnosis for individual cancer types, except for colorectal cancer. Higher practice use of referrals for suspected cancer is associated with lower mortality for the four most common types of cancer. A significant proportion of the observed mortality reduction is likely due to earlier stage at diagnosis, except for colorectal cancer. This adds to evidence supporting the lowering of referral thresholds and consequent increased use of urgent referral for suspected cancer.
doi_str_mv 10.3399/bjgp20X709433
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7176359</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2393041392</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-74da108b79e9202532a32801c685e2b2fa71b45091acfc9830eba0d444c65e063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1v1DAQxS1ERZfCkSuyxIVLqO2xnZgDUlXxJVXqBSRu0cSZpFll48V2ivbGn45pS0V7Glnze89-foy9kuIdgHOn3XbcK_GjFk4DPGEbqeumMkqrp2wjnBWVtBqO2fOUtkIoZaV4xo5BgVS1VRv2-yyl4CfMU1h4R_kX0cLXRDwMfI0jLZmnNe3JZ-q5x8VT5JEGihFnjkvPdyFmnKd8uDmljCNxzLyfcFxCmtJ7jtxUB8LIl5tbis6Hq6Iq8NofXrCjAedEL-_mCfv-6eO38y_VxeXnr-dnF5XX0uSq1j1K0XS1I6eEMqAQVCOkt40h1akBa9lpI5xEP3jXgKAORa-19taQsHDCPtz67tduR70vyUqEdh-nHcZDG3BqH26W6aodw3Vby9qCccXg7Z1BDD9XSrndTcnTPONCYU2tAgdCS3CqoG8eoduwxpK8UFpaAwYEFKq6pXwMKZVPvX-MFO3fbtsH3Rb-9f8J7ul_ZcIfEsGhzw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2416535303</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Association between use of urgent suspected cancer referral and mortality and stage at diagnosis: a 5-year national cohort study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Round, Thomas ; Gildea, Carolynn ; Ashworth, Mark ; Møller, Henrik</creator><creatorcontrib>Round, Thomas ; Gildea, Carolynn ; Ashworth, Mark ; Møller, Henrik</creatorcontrib><description>There is considerable variation between GP practices in England in their use of urgent referral pathways for suspected cancer. To determine the association between practice use of urgent referral and cancer stage at diagnosis and cancer patient mortality, for all cancers and the most common types of cancer (colorectal, lung, breast, and prostate). National cohort study of 1.4 million patients diagnosed with cancer in England between 2011 and 2015. The cohort was stratified according to quintiles of urgent referral metrics. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to quantify risk of death, and logistic regression to calculate odds of late-stage (III/IV) versus early-stage (I/II) cancers in relation to referral quintiles and cancer type. Cancer patients from the highest referring practices had a lower hazard of death (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.95 to 0.97), with similar patterns for individual cancers: colorectal (HR = 0.95; CI = 0.93 to 0.97); lung (HR = 0.95; CI = 0.94 to 0.97); breast (HR = 0.96; CI = 0.93 to 0.99); and prostate (HR = 0.88; CI = 0.85 to 0.91). Similarly, for cancer patients from these practices, there were lower odds of late-stage diagnosis for individual cancer types, except for colorectal cancer. Higher practice use of referrals for suspected cancer is associated with lower mortality for the four most common types of cancer. A significant proportion of the observed mortality reduction is likely due to earlier stage at diagnosis, except for colorectal cancer. This adds to evidence supporting the lowering of referral thresholds and consequent increased use of urgent referral for suspected cancer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-1643</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1478-5242</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1478-5242</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X709433</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32312762</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Royal College of General Practitioners</publisher><subject>Cancer ; Cohort analysis ; Cohort Studies ; England - epidemiology ; Family physicians ; General Practice ; Humans ; Male ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical referrals ; Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Primary care ; Referral and Consultation</subject><ispartof>British journal of general practice, 2020-06, Vol.70 (695), p.e389-e398</ispartof><rights>The Authors.</rights><rights>Copyright Royal College of General Practitioners Jun 2020</rights><rights>The Authors 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-74da108b79e9202532a32801c685e2b2fa71b45091acfc9830eba0d444c65e063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-74da108b79e9202532a32801c685e2b2fa71b45091acfc9830eba0d444c65e063</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7176359/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7176359/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27906,27907,53773,53775</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32312762$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Round, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gildea, Carolynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashworth, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Møller, Henrik</creatorcontrib><title>Association between use of urgent suspected cancer referral and mortality and stage at diagnosis: a 5-year national cohort study</title><title>British journal of general practice</title><addtitle>Br J Gen Pract</addtitle><description>There is considerable variation between GP practices in England in their use of urgent referral pathways for suspected cancer. To determine the association between practice use of urgent referral and cancer stage at diagnosis and cancer patient mortality, for all cancers and the most common types of cancer (colorectal, lung, breast, and prostate). National cohort study of 1.4 million patients diagnosed with cancer in England between 2011 and 2015. The cohort was stratified according to quintiles of urgent referral metrics. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to quantify risk of death, and logistic regression to calculate odds of late-stage (III/IV) versus early-stage (I/II) cancers in relation to referral quintiles and cancer type. Cancer patients from the highest referring practices had a lower hazard of death (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.95 to 0.97), with similar patterns for individual cancers: colorectal (HR = 0.95; CI = 0.93 to 0.97); lung (HR = 0.95; CI = 0.94 to 0.97); breast (HR = 0.96; CI = 0.93 to 0.99); and prostate (HR = 0.88; CI = 0.85 to 0.91). Similarly, for cancer patients from these practices, there were lower odds of late-stage diagnosis for individual cancer types, except for colorectal cancer. Higher practice use of referrals for suspected cancer is associated with lower mortality for the four most common types of cancer. A significant proportion of the observed mortality reduction is likely due to earlier stage at diagnosis, except for colorectal cancer. This adds to evidence supporting the lowering of referral thresholds and consequent increased use of urgent referral for suspected cancer.</description><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>England - epidemiology</subject><subject>Family physicians</subject><subject>General Practice</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical referrals</subject><subject>Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation</subject><issn>0960-1643</issn><issn>1478-5242</issn><issn>1478-5242</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc1v1DAQxS1ERZfCkSuyxIVLqO2xnZgDUlXxJVXqBSRu0cSZpFll48V2ivbGn45pS0V7Glnze89-foy9kuIdgHOn3XbcK_GjFk4DPGEbqeumMkqrp2wjnBWVtBqO2fOUtkIoZaV4xo5BgVS1VRv2-yyl4CfMU1h4R_kX0cLXRDwMfI0jLZmnNe3JZ-q5x8VT5JEGihFnjkvPdyFmnKd8uDmljCNxzLyfcFxCmtJ7jtxUB8LIl5tbis6Hq6Iq8NofXrCjAedEL-_mCfv-6eO38y_VxeXnr-dnF5XX0uSq1j1K0XS1I6eEMqAQVCOkt40h1akBa9lpI5xEP3jXgKAORa-19taQsHDCPtz67tduR70vyUqEdh-nHcZDG3BqH26W6aodw3Vby9qCccXg7Z1BDD9XSrndTcnTPONCYU2tAgdCS3CqoG8eoduwxpK8UFpaAwYEFKq6pXwMKZVPvX-MFO3fbtsH3Rb-9f8J7ul_ZcIfEsGhzw</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>Round, Thomas</creator><creator>Gildea, Carolynn</creator><creator>Ashworth, Mark</creator><creator>Møller, Henrik</creator><general>Royal College of General Practitioners</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>Association between use of urgent suspected cancer referral and mortality and stage at diagnosis: a 5-year national cohort study</title><author>Round, Thomas ; Gildea, Carolynn ; Ashworth, Mark ; Møller, Henrik</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-74da108b79e9202532a32801c685e2b2fa71b45091acfc9830eba0d444c65e063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>England - epidemiology</topic><topic>Family physicians</topic><topic>General Practice</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical referrals</topic><topic>Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Round, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gildea, Carolynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashworth, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Møller, Henrik</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of general practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Round, Thomas</au><au>Gildea, Carolynn</au><au>Ashworth, Mark</au><au>Møller, Henrik</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Association between use of urgent suspected cancer referral and mortality and stage at diagnosis: a 5-year national cohort study</atitle><jtitle>British journal of general practice</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Gen Pract</addtitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>695</issue><spage>e389</spage><epage>e398</epage><pages>e389-e398</pages><issn>0960-1643</issn><issn>1478-5242</issn><eissn>1478-5242</eissn><abstract>There is considerable variation between GP practices in England in their use of urgent referral pathways for suspected cancer. To determine the association between practice use of urgent referral and cancer stage at diagnosis and cancer patient mortality, for all cancers and the most common types of cancer (colorectal, lung, breast, and prostate). National cohort study of 1.4 million patients diagnosed with cancer in England between 2011 and 2015. The cohort was stratified according to quintiles of urgent referral metrics. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to quantify risk of death, and logistic regression to calculate odds of late-stage (III/IV) versus early-stage (I/II) cancers in relation to referral quintiles and cancer type. Cancer patients from the highest referring practices had a lower hazard of death (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.95 to 0.97), with similar patterns for individual cancers: colorectal (HR = 0.95; CI = 0.93 to 0.97); lung (HR = 0.95; CI = 0.94 to 0.97); breast (HR = 0.96; CI = 0.93 to 0.99); and prostate (HR = 0.88; CI = 0.85 to 0.91). Similarly, for cancer patients from these practices, there were lower odds of late-stage diagnosis for individual cancer types, except for colorectal cancer. Higher practice use of referrals for suspected cancer is associated with lower mortality for the four most common types of cancer. A significant proportion of the observed mortality reduction is likely due to earlier stage at diagnosis, except for colorectal cancer. This adds to evidence supporting the lowering of referral thresholds and consequent increased use of urgent referral for suspected cancer.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Royal College of General Practitioners</pub><pmid>32312762</pmid><doi>10.3399/bjgp20X709433</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0960-1643
ispartof British journal of general practice, 2020-06, Vol.70 (695), p.e389-e398
issn 0960-1643
1478-5242
1478-5242
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7176359
source MEDLINE; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Cancer
Cohort analysis
Cohort Studies
England - epidemiology
Family physicians
General Practice
Humans
Male
Medical diagnosis
Medical referrals
Neoplasms - diagnosis
Primary care
Referral and Consultation
title Association between use of urgent suspected cancer referral and mortality and stage at diagnosis: a 5-year national cohort study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T09%3A31%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Association%20between%20use%20of%20urgent%20suspected%20cancer%20referral%20and%20mortality%20and%20stage%20at%20diagnosis:%20a%205-year%20national%20cohort%20study&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20general%20practice&rft.au=Round,%20Thomas&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=695&rft.spage=e389&rft.epage=e398&rft.pages=e389-e398&rft.issn=0960-1643&rft.eissn=1478-5242&rft_id=info:doi/10.3399/bjgp20X709433&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2393041392%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2416535303&rft_id=info:pmid/32312762&rfr_iscdi=true