Association between use of urgent suspected cancer referral and mortality and stage at diagnosis: a 5-year national cohort study
There is considerable variation between GP practices in England in their use of urgent referral pathways for suspected cancer. To determine the association between practice use of urgent referral and cancer stage at diagnosis and cancer patient mortality, for all cancers and the most common types of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of general practice 2020-06, Vol.70 (695), p.e389-e398 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e398 |
---|---|
container_issue | 695 |
container_start_page | e389 |
container_title | British journal of general practice |
container_volume | 70 |
creator | Round, Thomas Gildea, Carolynn Ashworth, Mark Møller, Henrik |
description | There is considerable variation between GP practices in England in their use of urgent referral pathways for suspected cancer.
To determine the association between practice use of urgent referral and cancer stage at diagnosis and cancer patient mortality, for all cancers and the most common types of cancer (colorectal, lung, breast, and prostate).
National cohort study of 1.4 million patients diagnosed with cancer in England between 2011 and 2015.
The cohort was stratified according to quintiles of urgent referral metrics. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to quantify risk of death, and logistic regression to calculate odds of late-stage (III/IV) versus early-stage (I/II) cancers in relation to referral quintiles and cancer type.
Cancer patients from the highest referring practices had a lower hazard of death (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.95 to 0.97), with similar patterns for individual cancers: colorectal (HR = 0.95; CI = 0.93 to 0.97); lung (HR = 0.95; CI = 0.94 to 0.97); breast (HR = 0.96; CI = 0.93 to 0.99); and prostate (HR = 0.88; CI = 0.85 to 0.91). Similarly, for cancer patients from these practices, there were lower odds of late-stage diagnosis for individual cancer types, except for colorectal cancer.
Higher practice use of referrals for suspected cancer is associated with lower mortality for the four most common types of cancer. A significant proportion of the observed mortality reduction is likely due to earlier stage at diagnosis, except for colorectal cancer. This adds to evidence supporting the lowering of referral thresholds and consequent increased use of urgent referral for suspected cancer. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3399/bjgp20X709433 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7176359</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2393041392</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-74da108b79e9202532a32801c685e2b2fa71b45091acfc9830eba0d444c65e063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1v1DAQxS1ERZfCkSuyxIVLqO2xnZgDUlXxJVXqBSRu0cSZpFll48V2ivbGn45pS0V7Glnze89-foy9kuIdgHOn3XbcK_GjFk4DPGEbqeumMkqrp2wjnBWVtBqO2fOUtkIoZaV4xo5BgVS1VRv2-yyl4CfMU1h4R_kX0cLXRDwMfI0jLZmnNe3JZ-q5x8VT5JEGihFnjkvPdyFmnKd8uDmljCNxzLyfcFxCmtJ7jtxUB8LIl5tbis6Hq6Iq8NofXrCjAedEL-_mCfv-6eO38y_VxeXnr-dnF5XX0uSq1j1K0XS1I6eEMqAQVCOkt40h1akBa9lpI5xEP3jXgKAORa-19taQsHDCPtz67tduR70vyUqEdh-nHcZDG3BqH26W6aodw3Vby9qCccXg7Z1BDD9XSrndTcnTPONCYU2tAgdCS3CqoG8eoduwxpK8UFpaAwYEFKq6pXwMKZVPvX-MFO3fbtsH3Rb-9f8J7ul_ZcIfEsGhzw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2416535303</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Association between use of urgent suspected cancer referral and mortality and stage at diagnosis: a 5-year national cohort study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Round, Thomas ; Gildea, Carolynn ; Ashworth, Mark ; Møller, Henrik</creator><creatorcontrib>Round, Thomas ; Gildea, Carolynn ; Ashworth, Mark ; Møller, Henrik</creatorcontrib><description>There is considerable variation between GP practices in England in their use of urgent referral pathways for suspected cancer.
To determine the association between practice use of urgent referral and cancer stage at diagnosis and cancer patient mortality, for all cancers and the most common types of cancer (colorectal, lung, breast, and prostate).
National cohort study of 1.4 million patients diagnosed with cancer in England between 2011 and 2015.
The cohort was stratified according to quintiles of urgent referral metrics. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to quantify risk of death, and logistic regression to calculate odds of late-stage (III/IV) versus early-stage (I/II) cancers in relation to referral quintiles and cancer type.
Cancer patients from the highest referring practices had a lower hazard of death (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.95 to 0.97), with similar patterns for individual cancers: colorectal (HR = 0.95; CI = 0.93 to 0.97); lung (HR = 0.95; CI = 0.94 to 0.97); breast (HR = 0.96; CI = 0.93 to 0.99); and prostate (HR = 0.88; CI = 0.85 to 0.91). Similarly, for cancer patients from these practices, there were lower odds of late-stage diagnosis for individual cancer types, except for colorectal cancer.
Higher practice use of referrals for suspected cancer is associated with lower mortality for the four most common types of cancer. A significant proportion of the observed mortality reduction is likely due to earlier stage at diagnosis, except for colorectal cancer. This adds to evidence supporting the lowering of referral thresholds and consequent increased use of urgent referral for suspected cancer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-1643</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1478-5242</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1478-5242</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X709433</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32312762</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Royal College of General Practitioners</publisher><subject>Cancer ; Cohort analysis ; Cohort Studies ; England - epidemiology ; Family physicians ; General Practice ; Humans ; Male ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical referrals ; Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Primary care ; Referral and Consultation</subject><ispartof>British journal of general practice, 2020-06, Vol.70 (695), p.e389-e398</ispartof><rights>The Authors.</rights><rights>Copyright Royal College of General Practitioners Jun 2020</rights><rights>The Authors 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-74da108b79e9202532a32801c685e2b2fa71b45091acfc9830eba0d444c65e063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-74da108b79e9202532a32801c685e2b2fa71b45091acfc9830eba0d444c65e063</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7176359/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7176359/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27906,27907,53773,53775</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32312762$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Round, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gildea, Carolynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashworth, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Møller, Henrik</creatorcontrib><title>Association between use of urgent suspected cancer referral and mortality and stage at diagnosis: a 5-year national cohort study</title><title>British journal of general practice</title><addtitle>Br J Gen Pract</addtitle><description>There is considerable variation between GP practices in England in their use of urgent referral pathways for suspected cancer.
To determine the association between practice use of urgent referral and cancer stage at diagnosis and cancer patient mortality, for all cancers and the most common types of cancer (colorectal, lung, breast, and prostate).
National cohort study of 1.4 million patients diagnosed with cancer in England between 2011 and 2015.
The cohort was stratified according to quintiles of urgent referral metrics. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to quantify risk of death, and logistic regression to calculate odds of late-stage (III/IV) versus early-stage (I/II) cancers in relation to referral quintiles and cancer type.
Cancer patients from the highest referring practices had a lower hazard of death (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.95 to 0.97), with similar patterns for individual cancers: colorectal (HR = 0.95; CI = 0.93 to 0.97); lung (HR = 0.95; CI = 0.94 to 0.97); breast (HR = 0.96; CI = 0.93 to 0.99); and prostate (HR = 0.88; CI = 0.85 to 0.91). Similarly, for cancer patients from these practices, there were lower odds of late-stage diagnosis for individual cancer types, except for colorectal cancer.
Higher practice use of referrals for suspected cancer is associated with lower mortality for the four most common types of cancer. A significant proportion of the observed mortality reduction is likely due to earlier stage at diagnosis, except for colorectal cancer. This adds to evidence supporting the lowering of referral thresholds and consequent increased use of urgent referral for suspected cancer.</description><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>England - epidemiology</subject><subject>Family physicians</subject><subject>General Practice</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical referrals</subject><subject>Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation</subject><issn>0960-1643</issn><issn>1478-5242</issn><issn>1478-5242</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc1v1DAQxS1ERZfCkSuyxIVLqO2xnZgDUlXxJVXqBSRu0cSZpFll48V2ivbGn45pS0V7Glnze89-foy9kuIdgHOn3XbcK_GjFk4DPGEbqeumMkqrp2wjnBWVtBqO2fOUtkIoZaV4xo5BgVS1VRv2-yyl4CfMU1h4R_kX0cLXRDwMfI0jLZmnNe3JZ-q5x8VT5JEGihFnjkvPdyFmnKd8uDmljCNxzLyfcFxCmtJ7jtxUB8LIl5tbis6Hq6Iq8NofXrCjAedEL-_mCfv-6eO38y_VxeXnr-dnF5XX0uSq1j1K0XS1I6eEMqAQVCOkt40h1akBa9lpI5xEP3jXgKAORa-19taQsHDCPtz67tduR70vyUqEdh-nHcZDG3BqH26W6aodw3Vby9qCccXg7Z1BDD9XSrndTcnTPONCYU2tAgdCS3CqoG8eoduwxpK8UFpaAwYEFKq6pXwMKZVPvX-MFO3fbtsH3Rb-9f8J7ul_ZcIfEsGhzw</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>Round, Thomas</creator><creator>Gildea, Carolynn</creator><creator>Ashworth, Mark</creator><creator>Møller, Henrik</creator><general>Royal College of General Practitioners</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>Association between use of urgent suspected cancer referral and mortality and stage at diagnosis: a 5-year national cohort study</title><author>Round, Thomas ; Gildea, Carolynn ; Ashworth, Mark ; Møller, Henrik</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-74da108b79e9202532a32801c685e2b2fa71b45091acfc9830eba0d444c65e063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>England - epidemiology</topic><topic>Family physicians</topic><topic>General Practice</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical referrals</topic><topic>Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Round, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gildea, Carolynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashworth, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Møller, Henrik</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of general practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Round, Thomas</au><au>Gildea, Carolynn</au><au>Ashworth, Mark</au><au>Møller, Henrik</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Association between use of urgent suspected cancer referral and mortality and stage at diagnosis: a 5-year national cohort study</atitle><jtitle>British journal of general practice</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Gen Pract</addtitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>695</issue><spage>e389</spage><epage>e398</epage><pages>e389-e398</pages><issn>0960-1643</issn><issn>1478-5242</issn><eissn>1478-5242</eissn><abstract>There is considerable variation between GP practices in England in their use of urgent referral pathways for suspected cancer.
To determine the association between practice use of urgent referral and cancer stage at diagnosis and cancer patient mortality, for all cancers and the most common types of cancer (colorectal, lung, breast, and prostate).
National cohort study of 1.4 million patients diagnosed with cancer in England between 2011 and 2015.
The cohort was stratified according to quintiles of urgent referral metrics. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to quantify risk of death, and logistic regression to calculate odds of late-stage (III/IV) versus early-stage (I/II) cancers in relation to referral quintiles and cancer type.
Cancer patients from the highest referring practices had a lower hazard of death (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.95 to 0.97), with similar patterns for individual cancers: colorectal (HR = 0.95; CI = 0.93 to 0.97); lung (HR = 0.95; CI = 0.94 to 0.97); breast (HR = 0.96; CI = 0.93 to 0.99); and prostate (HR = 0.88; CI = 0.85 to 0.91). Similarly, for cancer patients from these practices, there were lower odds of late-stage diagnosis for individual cancer types, except for colorectal cancer.
Higher practice use of referrals for suspected cancer is associated with lower mortality for the four most common types of cancer. A significant proportion of the observed mortality reduction is likely due to earlier stage at diagnosis, except for colorectal cancer. This adds to evidence supporting the lowering of referral thresholds and consequent increased use of urgent referral for suspected cancer.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Royal College of General Practitioners</pub><pmid>32312762</pmid><doi>10.3399/bjgp20X709433</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0960-1643 |
ispartof | British journal of general practice, 2020-06, Vol.70 (695), p.e389-e398 |
issn | 0960-1643 1478-5242 1478-5242 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7176359 |
source | MEDLINE; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Cancer Cohort analysis Cohort Studies England - epidemiology Family physicians General Practice Humans Male Medical diagnosis Medical referrals Neoplasms - diagnosis Primary care Referral and Consultation |
title | Association between use of urgent suspected cancer referral and mortality and stage at diagnosis: a 5-year national cohort study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T09%3A31%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Association%20between%20use%20of%20urgent%20suspected%20cancer%20referral%20and%20mortality%20and%20stage%20at%20diagnosis:%20a%205-year%20national%20cohort%20study&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20general%20practice&rft.au=Round,%20Thomas&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=695&rft.spage=e389&rft.epage=e398&rft.pages=e389-e398&rft.issn=0960-1643&rft.eissn=1478-5242&rft_id=info:doi/10.3399/bjgp20X709433&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2393041392%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2416535303&rft_id=info:pmid/32312762&rfr_iscdi=true |