High-Volume and Privately Owned Ambulatory Surgical Centers Reduce Costs in Achilles Tendon Repair

Background: While Achilles tendon repairs are common, little data exist characterizing the cost drivers of this surgery. Purpose: To examine cases of primary Achilles tendon repair, primary repair with graft, and secondary repair to find patient characteristics and surgical variables that significan...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine 2020-04, Vol.8 (4), p.2325967120912398-2325967120912398
Hauptverfasser: Li, Lambert T., Chuck, Carlin, Bokshan, Steven L., O’Donnell, Ryan, Hsu, Raymond Y., Blankenhorn, Brad D., Owens, Brett D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2325967120912398
container_issue 4
container_start_page 2325967120912398
container_title Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine
container_volume 8
creator Li, Lambert T.
Chuck, Carlin
Bokshan, Steven L.
O’Donnell, Ryan
Hsu, Raymond Y.
Blankenhorn, Brad D.
Owens, Brett D.
description Background: While Achilles tendon repairs are common, little data exist characterizing the cost drivers of this surgery. Purpose: To examine cases of primary Achilles tendon repair, primary repair with graft, and secondary repair to find patient characteristics and surgical variables that significantly drive costs. Study Design: Economic and decision analysis; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 5955 repairs from 6 states were pulled from the 2014 State Ambulatory Surgery and Services Database under the Current Procedural Terminology codes 27650, 27652, and 27654. Cases were analyzed under univariate analysis to select the key variables driving cost. Variables deemed close to significance (P < .10) were then examined under generalized linear models (GLMs) and evaluated for statistical significance (P < .05). Results: The average cost was $14,951 for primary repair, $23,861 for primary repair with graft, and $20,115 for secondary repair (P < .001). In the GLMs, high-volume ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) showed a cost savings of $16,987 and $2854 in both the primary with graft and secondary repair groups, respectively (both P < .001). However, for primary repairs, high-volume ASCs had $2264 more in costs than low-volume ASCs (P < .001). In addition, privately owned ASCs showed cost savings compared with hospital-owned ASCs for both primary Achilles repair ($2450; P < .001) and primary repair with graft ($11,072; P = .019). Time in the operating room was also a significant cost, with each minute adding $36 of cost in primary repair and $31 in secondary repair (both P < .001). Conclusion: Private ASCs are associated with lower costs for patients undergoing primary Achilles repair, both with and without a graft. Patients undergoing the more complex secondary and primary with graft Achilles repairs had lower costs in facilities with greater caseload.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/2325967120912398
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7172000</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_2325967120912398</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2395633650</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-bf732efb71a0ac9c348b1377e38cf7089bf9eced4d2fe0143095cdf11c3105cf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1r3DAQhkVpaEKSe09F0EsvbvVhW9alsCxtEwgktEmuQpZHuwqytJXslP331bJJmgSqi8TMM69m5kXoPSWfKRXiC-Oska2gjEjKuOzeoKNdqNrF3j57H6LTnO9IOV1DJRfv0CFnvKaSySPUn7nVurqNfh4B6zDgq-Tu9QR-iy__BBjwYuxnr6eYtvjXnFbOaI-XECZIGf-EYTaAlzFPGbuAF2btvIeMryEMMZT8Rrt0gg6s9hlOH-5jdPP92_XyrLq4_HG-XFxUpm7ZVPVWcAa2F1QTbaThdddTLgTwzlhBOtlbCQaGemAWCK05kY0ZLKWGU9IYy4_R173uZu5HGExpMmmvNsmNOm1V1E69zAS3Vqt4rwQVrGynCHx6EEjx9wx5UqPLBrzXAeKcVVly03LeNjv04yv0Ls4plPEUqwltBeGkLRTZUybFnBPYp2YoUTsP1WsPS8mH50M8FTw6VoBqD2S9gn-__lfwL2BWpFY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2401670306</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>High-Volume and Privately Owned Ambulatory Surgical Centers Reduce Costs in Achilles Tendon Repair</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Li, Lambert T. ; Chuck, Carlin ; Bokshan, Steven L. ; O’Donnell, Ryan ; Hsu, Raymond Y. ; Blankenhorn, Brad D. ; Owens, Brett D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Lambert T. ; Chuck, Carlin ; Bokshan, Steven L. ; O’Donnell, Ryan ; Hsu, Raymond Y. ; Blankenhorn, Brad D. ; Owens, Brett D.</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Background: While Achilles tendon repairs are common, little data exist characterizing the cost drivers of this surgery. Purpose: To examine cases of primary Achilles tendon repair, primary repair with graft, and secondary repair to find patient characteristics and surgical variables that significantly drive costs. Study Design: Economic and decision analysis; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 5955 repairs from 6 states were pulled from the 2014 State Ambulatory Surgery and Services Database under the Current Procedural Terminology codes 27650, 27652, and 27654. Cases were analyzed under univariate analysis to select the key variables driving cost. Variables deemed close to significance (P < .10) were then examined under generalized linear models (GLMs) and evaluated for statistical significance (P < .05). Results: The average cost was $14,951 for primary repair, $23,861 for primary repair with graft, and $20,115 for secondary repair (P < .001). In the GLMs, high-volume ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) showed a cost savings of $16,987 and $2854 in both the primary with graft and secondary repair groups, respectively (both P < .001). However, for primary repairs, high-volume ASCs had $2264 more in costs than low-volume ASCs (P < .001). In addition, privately owned ASCs showed cost savings compared with hospital-owned ASCs for both primary Achilles repair ($2450; P < .001) and primary repair with graft ($11,072; P = .019). Time in the operating room was also a significant cost, with each minute adding $36 of cost in primary repair and $31 in secondary repair (both P < .001). Conclusion: Private ASCs are associated with lower costs for patients undergoing primary Achilles repair, both with and without a graft. Patients undergoing the more complex secondary and primary with graft Achilles repairs had lower costs in facilities with greater caseload.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 2325-9671</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2325-9671</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/2325967120912398</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32341929</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Cost control ; Cost reduction ; Generalized linear models ; Orthopedics ; Sports medicine ; Tendons ; Terminology</subject><ispartof>Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2020-04, Vol.8 (4), p.2325967120912398-2325967120912398</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial – No Derivatives License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020 2020 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-bf732efb71a0ac9c348b1377e38cf7089bf9eced4d2fe0143095cdf11c3105cf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-bf732efb71a0ac9c348b1377e38cf7089bf9eced4d2fe0143095cdf11c3105cf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7172000/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7172000/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,21966,27853,27924,27925,44945,45333,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32341929$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Lambert T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chuck, Carlin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bokshan, Steven L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Donnell, Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsu, Raymond Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blankenhorn, Brad D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owens, Brett D.</creatorcontrib><title>High-Volume and Privately Owned Ambulatory Surgical Centers Reduce Costs in Achilles Tendon Repair</title><title>Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine</title><addtitle>Orthop J Sports Med</addtitle><description><![CDATA[Background: While Achilles tendon repairs are common, little data exist characterizing the cost drivers of this surgery. Purpose: To examine cases of primary Achilles tendon repair, primary repair with graft, and secondary repair to find patient characteristics and surgical variables that significantly drive costs. Study Design: Economic and decision analysis; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 5955 repairs from 6 states were pulled from the 2014 State Ambulatory Surgery and Services Database under the Current Procedural Terminology codes 27650, 27652, and 27654. Cases were analyzed under univariate analysis to select the key variables driving cost. Variables deemed close to significance (P < .10) were then examined under generalized linear models (GLMs) and evaluated for statistical significance (P < .05). Results: The average cost was $14,951 for primary repair, $23,861 for primary repair with graft, and $20,115 for secondary repair (P < .001). In the GLMs, high-volume ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) showed a cost savings of $16,987 and $2854 in both the primary with graft and secondary repair groups, respectively (both P < .001). However, for primary repairs, high-volume ASCs had $2264 more in costs than low-volume ASCs (P < .001). In addition, privately owned ASCs showed cost savings compared with hospital-owned ASCs for both primary Achilles repair ($2450; P < .001) and primary repair with graft ($11,072; P = .019). Time in the operating room was also a significant cost, with each minute adding $36 of cost in primary repair and $31 in secondary repair (both P < .001). Conclusion: Private ASCs are associated with lower costs for patients undergoing primary Achilles repair, both with and without a graft. Patients undergoing the more complex secondary and primary with graft Achilles repairs had lower costs in facilities with greater caseload.]]></description><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Cost reduction</subject><subject>Generalized linear models</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Sports medicine</subject><subject>Tendons</subject><subject>Terminology</subject><issn>2325-9671</issn><issn>2325-9671</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1r3DAQhkVpaEKSe09F0EsvbvVhW9alsCxtEwgktEmuQpZHuwqytJXslP331bJJmgSqi8TMM69m5kXoPSWfKRXiC-Oska2gjEjKuOzeoKNdqNrF3j57H6LTnO9IOV1DJRfv0CFnvKaSySPUn7nVurqNfh4B6zDgq-Tu9QR-iy__BBjwYuxnr6eYtvjXnFbOaI-XECZIGf-EYTaAlzFPGbuAF2btvIeMryEMMZT8Rrt0gg6s9hlOH-5jdPP92_XyrLq4_HG-XFxUpm7ZVPVWcAa2F1QTbaThdddTLgTwzlhBOtlbCQaGemAWCK05kY0ZLKWGU9IYy4_R173uZu5HGExpMmmvNsmNOm1V1E69zAS3Vqt4rwQVrGynCHx6EEjx9wx5UqPLBrzXAeKcVVly03LeNjv04yv0Ls4plPEUqwltBeGkLRTZUybFnBPYp2YoUTsP1WsPS8mH50M8FTw6VoBqD2S9gn-__lfwL2BWpFY</recordid><startdate>20200401</startdate><enddate>20200401</enddate><creator>Li, Lambert T.</creator><creator>Chuck, Carlin</creator><creator>Bokshan, Steven L.</creator><creator>O’Donnell, Ryan</creator><creator>Hsu, Raymond Y.</creator><creator>Blankenhorn, Brad D.</creator><creator>Owens, Brett D.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200401</creationdate><title>High-Volume and Privately Owned Ambulatory Surgical Centers Reduce Costs in Achilles Tendon Repair</title><author>Li, Lambert T. ; Chuck, Carlin ; Bokshan, Steven L. ; O’Donnell, Ryan ; Hsu, Raymond Y. ; Blankenhorn, Brad D. ; Owens, Brett D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-bf732efb71a0ac9c348b1377e38cf7089bf9eced4d2fe0143095cdf11c3105cf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Cost reduction</topic><topic>Generalized linear models</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Sports medicine</topic><topic>Tendons</topic><topic>Terminology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Lambert T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chuck, Carlin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bokshan, Steven L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Donnell, Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsu, Raymond Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blankenhorn, Brad D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owens, Brett D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Lambert T.</au><au>Chuck, Carlin</au><au>Bokshan, Steven L.</au><au>O’Donnell, Ryan</au><au>Hsu, Raymond Y.</au><au>Blankenhorn, Brad D.</au><au>Owens, Brett D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>High-Volume and Privately Owned Ambulatory Surgical Centers Reduce Costs in Achilles Tendon Repair</atitle><jtitle>Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Orthop J Sports Med</addtitle><date>2020-04-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>2325967120912398</spage><epage>2325967120912398</epage><pages>2325967120912398-2325967120912398</pages><issn>2325-9671</issn><eissn>2325-9671</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Background: While Achilles tendon repairs are common, little data exist characterizing the cost drivers of this surgery. Purpose: To examine cases of primary Achilles tendon repair, primary repair with graft, and secondary repair to find patient characteristics and surgical variables that significantly drive costs. Study Design: Economic and decision analysis; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 5955 repairs from 6 states were pulled from the 2014 State Ambulatory Surgery and Services Database under the Current Procedural Terminology codes 27650, 27652, and 27654. Cases were analyzed under univariate analysis to select the key variables driving cost. Variables deemed close to significance (P < .10) were then examined under generalized linear models (GLMs) and evaluated for statistical significance (P < .05). Results: The average cost was $14,951 for primary repair, $23,861 for primary repair with graft, and $20,115 for secondary repair (P < .001). In the GLMs, high-volume ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) showed a cost savings of $16,987 and $2854 in both the primary with graft and secondary repair groups, respectively (both P < .001). However, for primary repairs, high-volume ASCs had $2264 more in costs than low-volume ASCs (P < .001). In addition, privately owned ASCs showed cost savings compared with hospital-owned ASCs for both primary Achilles repair ($2450; P < .001) and primary repair with graft ($11,072; P = .019). Time in the operating room was also a significant cost, with each minute adding $36 of cost in primary repair and $31 in secondary repair (both P < .001). Conclusion: Private ASCs are associated with lower costs for patients undergoing primary Achilles repair, both with and without a graft. Patients undergoing the more complex secondary and primary with graft Achilles repairs had lower costs in facilities with greater caseload.]]></abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>32341929</pmid><doi>10.1177/2325967120912398</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2325-9671
ispartof Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2020-04, Vol.8 (4), p.2325967120912398-2325967120912398
issn 2325-9671
2325-9671
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7172000
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Cost control
Cost reduction
Generalized linear models
Orthopedics
Sports medicine
Tendons
Terminology
title High-Volume and Privately Owned Ambulatory Surgical Centers Reduce Costs in Achilles Tendon Repair
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T17%3A09%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=High-Volume%20and%20Privately%20Owned%20Ambulatory%20Surgical%20Centers%20Reduce%20Costs%20in%20Achilles%20Tendon%20Repair&rft.jtitle=Orthopaedic%20journal%20of%20sports%20medicine&rft.au=Li,%20Lambert%20T.&rft.date=2020-04-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=2325967120912398&rft.epage=2325967120912398&rft.pages=2325967120912398-2325967120912398&rft.issn=2325-9671&rft.eissn=2325-9671&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/2325967120912398&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2395633650%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2401670306&rft_id=info:pmid/32341929&rft_sage_id=10.1177_2325967120912398&rfr_iscdi=true