Tolerance of one-month intranasal interferon

Under double‐blind conditions, groups of volunteers (68 in total) were allocated at random to take intranasal solutions of placebo or one of three doses of highly purified leucocyte interferon by intranasal spray twice a day for 28 days. The highest dose would have been expected to protect against e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of medical virology 1985-10, Vol.17 (2), p.99-106
Hauptverfasser: Scott, G. M., Onwubalili, J. K., Robinson, J. A., Doré, C., Secher, D. S., Cantell, K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 106
container_issue 2
container_start_page 99
container_title Journal of medical virology
container_volume 17
creator Scott, G. M.
Onwubalili, J. K.
Robinson, J. A.
Doré, C.
Secher, D. S.
Cantell, K.
description Under double‐blind conditions, groups of volunteers (68 in total) were allocated at random to take intranasal solutions of placebo or one of three doses of highly purified leucocyte interferon by intranasal spray twice a day for 28 days. The highest dose would have been expected to protect against experimental colds. Treatment was discontinued because of upper respiratory symptoms as often in each of the interferon groups as in the placebo group. However, it was possible to distinguish clinically between “colds” on placebo and low‐dose interferon and “reactions to treatment” on high‐dose interferon. The features of the reactions to treatment were a protracted build‐up of local symptoms and minor epistaxis. None of the volunteers on the high‐dose interferon were thought to have a definite cold, but viruses were isolated from four out of six volunteers on low‐dose interferon who had definite colds. Previous experiments had also shown this dose to be insufficient to protect against experimental rhinovirus challenge. The dose of interferon that appeared to protect against virus infection caused significant unwanted effects. It is essential to find interferon preparations with less inflammatory activity before interferon can be considered for use as a long‐term prophylactic against the common cold.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jmv.1890170202
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7166573</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>14267408</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5332-a33bba04584f04b419568708396a8698a373ff359a29c649febb938b02f3e8be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUMlOwzAQtRAISuHKDakHxImUsZ14uSAhlhZEy4XlaDlhDIEkBrtl-XtStSpw4jSjecs8PUJ2KPQpADt8rt_7VGmgEhiwFdKhoEWiQdJV0gGaikQImm2QzRifAUBpxtbJOtNaciU75ODGVxhsU2DPu55vMKl9M3nqlc2kvdpoq9mKwWHwzRZZc7aKuL2YXXJ7fnZzMkyurgcXJ8dXSZFxzhLLeZ5bSDOVOkjzlOpMKAmKa2GV0MpyyZ3jmbZMFyLVDvNcc5UDcxxVjrxLjua-r9O8xocCZ2Eq8xrK2oYv421p_iJN-WQe_buRVIhM8tZgf2EQ_NsU48TUZSywqmyDfhoNTZmQaZuoS_pzYhF8jAHd8gkFM-vXtP2an35bwe7vaEv6otAW31vgNha2crNqy7ikSS0UV6Kl6Tnto6zw65-n5nJ09ydCMteWcYKfS60NL0ZILjNzPx6Y4Xg0PFXjewP8G3Pior0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14267408</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tolerance of one-month intranasal interferon</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Scott, G. M. ; Onwubalili, J. K. ; Robinson, J. A. ; Doré, C. ; Secher, D. S. ; Cantell, K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Scott, G. M. ; Onwubalili, J. K. ; Robinson, J. A. ; Doré, C. ; Secher, D. S. ; Cantell, K.</creatorcontrib><description>Under double‐blind conditions, groups of volunteers (68 in total) were allocated at random to take intranasal solutions of placebo or one of three doses of highly purified leucocyte interferon by intranasal spray twice a day for 28 days. The highest dose would have been expected to protect against experimental colds. Treatment was discontinued because of upper respiratory symptoms as often in each of the interferon groups as in the placebo group. However, it was possible to distinguish clinically between “colds” on placebo and low‐dose interferon and “reactions to treatment” on high‐dose interferon. The features of the reactions to treatment were a protracted build‐up of local symptoms and minor epistaxis. None of the volunteers on the high‐dose interferon were thought to have a definite cold, but viruses were isolated from four out of six volunteers on low‐dose interferon who had definite colds. Previous experiments had also shown this dose to be insufficient to protect against experimental rhinovirus challenge. The dose of interferon that appeared to protect against virus infection caused significant unwanted effects. It is essential to find interferon preparations with less inflammatory activity before interferon can be considered for use as a long‐term prophylactic against the common cold.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0146-6615</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9071</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jmv.1890170202</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2997387</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JMVIDB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Administration, Intranasal ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents ; Antiviral agents ; Biological and medical sciences ; coronavirus ; Double-Blind Method ; Drug Evaluation ; Drug Tolerance ; Female ; Humans ; Interferon Inducers ; Interferon Type I - administration &amp; dosage ; Interferon Type I - toxicity ; leucocyte interferon ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Parainfluenza Virus 1, Human - immunology ; paramyxovirus ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Respiratory Tract Diseases - chemically induced ; rhinovirus ; volunteers</subject><ispartof>Journal of medical virology, 1985-10, Vol.17 (2), p.99-106</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1985 Wiley‐Liss, Inc., A Wiley Company</rights><rights>1987 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5332-a33bba04584f04b419568708396a8698a373ff359a29c649febb938b02f3e8be3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5332-a33bba04584f04b419568708396a8698a373ff359a29c649febb938b02f3e8be3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjmv.1890170202$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjmv.1890170202$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=7968386$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2997387$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Scott, G. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onwubalili, J. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doré, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Secher, D. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cantell, K.</creatorcontrib><title>Tolerance of one-month intranasal interferon</title><title>Journal of medical virology</title><addtitle>J. Med. Virol</addtitle><description>Under double‐blind conditions, groups of volunteers (68 in total) were allocated at random to take intranasal solutions of placebo or one of three doses of highly purified leucocyte interferon by intranasal spray twice a day for 28 days. The highest dose would have been expected to protect against experimental colds. Treatment was discontinued because of upper respiratory symptoms as often in each of the interferon groups as in the placebo group. However, it was possible to distinguish clinically between “colds” on placebo and low‐dose interferon and “reactions to treatment” on high‐dose interferon. The features of the reactions to treatment were a protracted build‐up of local symptoms and minor epistaxis. None of the volunteers on the high‐dose interferon were thought to have a definite cold, but viruses were isolated from four out of six volunteers on low‐dose interferon who had definite colds. Previous experiments had also shown this dose to be insufficient to protect against experimental rhinovirus challenge. The dose of interferon that appeared to protect against virus infection caused significant unwanted effects. It is essential to find interferon preparations with less inflammatory activity before interferon can be considered for use as a long‐term prophylactic against the common cold.</description><subject>Administration, Intranasal</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents</subject><subject>Antiviral agents</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>coronavirus</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Drug Evaluation</subject><subject>Drug Tolerance</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interferon Inducers</subject><subject>Interferon Type I - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Interferon Type I - toxicity</subject><subject>leucocyte interferon</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Parainfluenza Virus 1, Human - immunology</subject><subject>paramyxovirus</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Respiratory Tract Diseases - chemically induced</subject><subject>rhinovirus</subject><subject>volunteers</subject><issn>0146-6615</issn><issn>1096-9071</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUMlOwzAQtRAISuHKDakHxImUsZ14uSAhlhZEy4XlaDlhDIEkBrtl-XtStSpw4jSjecs8PUJ2KPQpADt8rt_7VGmgEhiwFdKhoEWiQdJV0gGaikQImm2QzRifAUBpxtbJOtNaciU75ODGVxhsU2DPu55vMKl9M3nqlc2kvdpoq9mKwWHwzRZZc7aKuL2YXXJ7fnZzMkyurgcXJ8dXSZFxzhLLeZ5bSDOVOkjzlOpMKAmKa2GV0MpyyZ3jmbZMFyLVDvNcc5UDcxxVjrxLjua-r9O8xocCZ2Eq8xrK2oYv421p_iJN-WQe_buRVIhM8tZgf2EQ_NsU48TUZSywqmyDfhoNTZmQaZuoS_pzYhF8jAHd8gkFM-vXtP2an35bwe7vaEv6otAW31vgNha2crNqy7ikSS0UV6Kl6Tnto6zw65-n5nJ09ydCMteWcYKfS60NL0ZILjNzPx6Y4Xg0PFXjewP8G3Pior0</recordid><startdate>198510</startdate><enddate>198510</enddate><creator>Scott, G. M.</creator><creator>Onwubalili, J. K.</creator><creator>Robinson, J. A.</creator><creator>Doré, C.</creator><creator>Secher, D. S.</creator><creator>Cantell, K.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley-Liss</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198510</creationdate><title>Tolerance of one-month intranasal interferon</title><author>Scott, G. M. ; Onwubalili, J. K. ; Robinson, J. A. ; Doré, C. ; Secher, D. S. ; Cantell, K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5332-a33bba04584f04b419568708396a8698a373ff359a29c649febb938b02f3e8be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><topic>Administration, Intranasal</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents</topic><topic>Antiviral agents</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>coronavirus</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Drug Evaluation</topic><topic>Drug Tolerance</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interferon Inducers</topic><topic>Interferon Type I - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Interferon Type I - toxicity</topic><topic>leucocyte interferon</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Parainfluenza Virus 1, Human - immunology</topic><topic>paramyxovirus</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Respiratory Tract Diseases - chemically induced</topic><topic>rhinovirus</topic><topic>volunteers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Scott, G. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onwubalili, J. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doré, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Secher, D. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cantell, K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of medical virology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Scott, G. M.</au><au>Onwubalili, J. K.</au><au>Robinson, J. A.</au><au>Doré, C.</au><au>Secher, D. S.</au><au>Cantell, K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tolerance of one-month intranasal interferon</atitle><jtitle>Journal of medical virology</jtitle><addtitle>J. Med. Virol</addtitle><date>1985-10</date><risdate>1985</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>99</spage><epage>106</epage><pages>99-106</pages><issn>0146-6615</issn><eissn>1096-9071</eissn><coden>JMVIDB</coden><abstract>Under double‐blind conditions, groups of volunteers (68 in total) were allocated at random to take intranasal solutions of placebo or one of three doses of highly purified leucocyte interferon by intranasal spray twice a day for 28 days. The highest dose would have been expected to protect against experimental colds. Treatment was discontinued because of upper respiratory symptoms as often in each of the interferon groups as in the placebo group. However, it was possible to distinguish clinically between “colds” on placebo and low‐dose interferon and “reactions to treatment” on high‐dose interferon. The features of the reactions to treatment were a protracted build‐up of local symptoms and minor epistaxis. None of the volunteers on the high‐dose interferon were thought to have a definite cold, but viruses were isolated from four out of six volunteers on low‐dose interferon who had definite colds. Previous experiments had also shown this dose to be insufficient to protect against experimental rhinovirus challenge. The dose of interferon that appeared to protect against virus infection caused significant unwanted effects. It is essential to find interferon preparations with less inflammatory activity before interferon can be considered for use as a long‐term prophylactic against the common cold.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>2997387</pmid><doi>10.1002/jmv.1890170202</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0146-6615
ispartof Journal of medical virology, 1985-10, Vol.17 (2), p.99-106
issn 0146-6615
1096-9071
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7166573
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Administration, Intranasal
Adolescent
Adult
Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents
Antiviral agents
Biological and medical sciences
coronavirus
Double-Blind Method
Drug Evaluation
Drug Tolerance
Female
Humans
Interferon Inducers
Interferon Type I - administration & dosage
Interferon Type I - toxicity
leucocyte interferon
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Parainfluenza Virus 1, Human - immunology
paramyxovirus
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Respiratory Tract Diseases - chemically induced
rhinovirus
volunteers
title Tolerance of one-month intranasal interferon
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T23%3A01%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tolerance%20of%20one-month%20intranasal%20interferon&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20medical%20virology&rft.au=Scott,%20G.%20M.&rft.date=1985-10&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=99&rft.epage=106&rft.pages=99-106&rft.issn=0146-6615&rft.eissn=1096-9071&rft.coden=JMVIDB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jmv.1890170202&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E14267408%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14267408&rft_id=info:pmid/2997387&rfr_iscdi=true