Comparison between Two Different Device Models 18 Hz GPS Used for Time-Motion Analyses in Ecological Testing of Football

The aim of this study was to compare the validity of two different GPS device models used for time-motion analyses in ecological testing of football. Ten healthy male players from a Spanish university football team participated in this study. The team sport simulation circuit (TSCC) used was based o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of environmental research and public health 2020-03, Vol.17 (6), p.1912
Hauptverfasser: Gimenez, Jesus Vicente, Garcia-Unanue, Jorge, Navandar, Archit, Viejo-Romero, David, Sanchez-Sanchez, Javier, Gallardo, Leonor, Hernandez-Martin, Antonio, Felipe, Jose Luis
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1912
container_title International journal of environmental research and public health
container_volume 17
creator Gimenez, Jesus Vicente
Garcia-Unanue, Jorge
Navandar, Archit
Viejo-Romero, David
Sanchez-Sanchez, Javier
Gallardo, Leonor
Hernandez-Martin, Antonio
Felipe, Jose Luis
description The aim of this study was to compare the validity of two different GPS device models used for time-motion analyses in ecological testing of football. Ten healthy male players from a Spanish university football team participated in this study. The team sport simulation circuit (TSCC) used was based on previous research examining the validity and interunit reliability of different GPS systems. Participants were required to complete eight laps of the TSSC, resulting in a total distance of 1320 m. The GPS units used for the current study were the 18 Hz StatsSport Apex Pro and 18 Hz RealTrack WIMU Pro. Participants were required to wear either of the two GPS units during the test. To establish the construct validity of GPS as a measure of V , timing lights were used as a gold standard. The results clearly suggest that it is not possible to use the same 18 Hz GPS model or interchange it. The measurement can be considered precise when the noise is at least equal to or lower than the smallest worthwhile change. In this case, all standard deviation in measurement error was higher than the smallest worthwhile change. This is due to an inconsistency in the data processing of each trademark. It is important to prevent a club using different GPS trademarks at the same time, since it is not possible to compare in any case any type of result obtained between different trademarks.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/ijerph17061912
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7142465</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2378900227</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-d2945ce5c134f2bda02214f02290072ee3014009f635d50636674f143cbf23dc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUtv1DAUhS0Eog_YskSW2HST4lecZINUTV9IrUBiurYc53rqkZM72JmW8utraKlaNr6W_N2jc3wI-cDZoZQd-xzWkDbXvGGad1y8Irtca1YpzfjrZ_cdspfzmjHZKt29JTtS8FaqVuySXwscNzaFjBPtYb4FmOjyFulx8B4STDM9hpvggF7iADFT3tLz3_Ts-w96lWGgHhNdhhGqS5xDkTiabLzLkGmY6InDiKvgbKRLyHOYVhQ9PUWcexvjO_LG25jh_ePcJ1enJ8vFeXXx7ezr4uiicoq3czWITtUOasel8qIfLBOCK1_OjrFGAEjGFWOd17Ieaqal1o3yXEnXeyEHJ_fJlwfdzbYfYXAlUrLRbFIYbbozaIN5-TKFa7PCG9NwJZSui8DBo0DCn9sSxIwhO4jRToDbbIRs2uJFiKagn_5D17hN5Uv-Ul1T_DFVqMMHyiXMOYF_MsOZ-VOqeVlqWfj4PMIT_q9FeQ9_Y515</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2379750604</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison between Two Different Device Models 18 Hz GPS Used for Time-Motion Analyses in Ecological Testing of Football</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Gimenez, Jesus Vicente ; Garcia-Unanue, Jorge ; Navandar, Archit ; Viejo-Romero, David ; Sanchez-Sanchez, Javier ; Gallardo, Leonor ; Hernandez-Martin, Antonio ; Felipe, Jose Luis</creator><creatorcontrib>Gimenez, Jesus Vicente ; Garcia-Unanue, Jorge ; Navandar, Archit ; Viejo-Romero, David ; Sanchez-Sanchez, Javier ; Gallardo, Leonor ; Hernandez-Martin, Antonio ; Felipe, Jose Luis</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to compare the validity of two different GPS device models used for time-motion analyses in ecological testing of football. Ten healthy male players from a Spanish university football team participated in this study. The team sport simulation circuit (TSCC) used was based on previous research examining the validity and interunit reliability of different GPS systems. Participants were required to complete eight laps of the TSSC, resulting in a total distance of 1320 m. The GPS units used for the current study were the 18 Hz StatsSport Apex Pro and 18 Hz RealTrack WIMU Pro. Participants were required to wear either of the two GPS units during the test. To establish the construct validity of GPS as a measure of V , timing lights were used as a gold standard. The results clearly suggest that it is not possible to use the same 18 Hz GPS model or interchange it. The measurement can be considered precise when the noise is at least equal to or lower than the smallest worthwhile change. In this case, all standard deviation in measurement error was higher than the smallest worthwhile change. This is due to an inconsistency in the data processing of each trademark. It is important to prevent a club using different GPS trademarks at the same time, since it is not possible to compare in any case any type of result obtained between different trademarks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1661-7827</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17061912</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32183482</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Australian football ; Computer simulation ; Data processing ; Error analysis ; Global positioning systems ; GPS ; Load ; Physiology ; Studies ; Team sports ; Trademarks ; Validity ; Values ; Velocity</subject><ispartof>International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020-03, Vol.17 (6), p.1912</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2020 by the authors. 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-d2945ce5c134f2bda02214f02290072ee3014009f635d50636674f143cbf23dc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-d2945ce5c134f2bda02214f02290072ee3014009f635d50636674f143cbf23dc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0794-4042 ; 0000-0002-1741-5566 ; 0000-0001-6997-8099 ; 0000-0003-0017-0184 ; 0000-0002-2029-1277 ; 0000-0002-6296-6121</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7142465/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7142465/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32183482$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gimenez, Jesus Vicente</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia-Unanue, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navandar, Archit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viejo-Romero, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanchez-Sanchez, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallardo, Leonor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernandez-Martin, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Felipe, Jose Luis</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison between Two Different Device Models 18 Hz GPS Used for Time-Motion Analyses in Ecological Testing of Football</title><title>International journal of environmental research and public health</title><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to compare the validity of two different GPS device models used for time-motion analyses in ecological testing of football. Ten healthy male players from a Spanish university football team participated in this study. The team sport simulation circuit (TSCC) used was based on previous research examining the validity and interunit reliability of different GPS systems. Participants were required to complete eight laps of the TSSC, resulting in a total distance of 1320 m. The GPS units used for the current study were the 18 Hz StatsSport Apex Pro and 18 Hz RealTrack WIMU Pro. Participants were required to wear either of the two GPS units during the test. To establish the construct validity of GPS as a measure of V , timing lights were used as a gold standard. The results clearly suggest that it is not possible to use the same 18 Hz GPS model or interchange it. The measurement can be considered precise when the noise is at least equal to or lower than the smallest worthwhile change. In this case, all standard deviation in measurement error was higher than the smallest worthwhile change. This is due to an inconsistency in the data processing of each trademark. It is important to prevent a club using different GPS trademarks at the same time, since it is not possible to compare in any case any type of result obtained between different trademarks.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Australian football</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Error analysis</subject><subject>Global positioning systems</subject><subject>GPS</subject><subject>Load</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Team sports</subject><subject>Trademarks</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Values</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><issn>1660-4601</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUtv1DAUhS0Eog_YskSW2HST4lecZINUTV9IrUBiurYc53rqkZM72JmW8utraKlaNr6W_N2jc3wI-cDZoZQd-xzWkDbXvGGad1y8Irtca1YpzfjrZ_cdspfzmjHZKt29JTtS8FaqVuySXwscNzaFjBPtYb4FmOjyFulx8B4STDM9hpvggF7iADFT3tLz3_Ts-w96lWGgHhNdhhGqS5xDkTiabLzLkGmY6InDiKvgbKRLyHOYVhQ9PUWcexvjO_LG25jh_ePcJ1enJ8vFeXXx7ezr4uiicoq3czWITtUOasel8qIfLBOCK1_OjrFGAEjGFWOd17Ieaqal1o3yXEnXeyEHJ_fJlwfdzbYfYXAlUrLRbFIYbbozaIN5-TKFa7PCG9NwJZSui8DBo0DCn9sSxIwhO4jRToDbbIRs2uJFiKagn_5D17hN5Uv-Ul1T_DFVqMMHyiXMOYF_MsOZ-VOqeVlqWfj4PMIT_q9FeQ9_Y515</recordid><startdate>20200315</startdate><enddate>20200315</enddate><creator>Gimenez, Jesus Vicente</creator><creator>Garcia-Unanue, Jorge</creator><creator>Navandar, Archit</creator><creator>Viejo-Romero, David</creator><creator>Sanchez-Sanchez, Javier</creator><creator>Gallardo, Leonor</creator><creator>Hernandez-Martin, Antonio</creator><creator>Felipe, Jose Luis</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0794-4042</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1741-5566</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6997-8099</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0017-0184</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2029-1277</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6296-6121</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200315</creationdate><title>Comparison between Two Different Device Models 18 Hz GPS Used for Time-Motion Analyses in Ecological Testing of Football</title><author>Gimenez, Jesus Vicente ; Garcia-Unanue, Jorge ; Navandar, Archit ; Viejo-Romero, David ; Sanchez-Sanchez, Javier ; Gallardo, Leonor ; Hernandez-Martin, Antonio ; Felipe, Jose Luis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-d2945ce5c134f2bda02214f02290072ee3014009f635d50636674f143cbf23dc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Australian football</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Error analysis</topic><topic>Global positioning systems</topic><topic>GPS</topic><topic>Load</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Team sports</topic><topic>Trademarks</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Values</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gimenez, Jesus Vicente</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia-Unanue, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navandar, Archit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viejo-Romero, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanchez-Sanchez, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallardo, Leonor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernandez-Martin, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Felipe, Jose Luis</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gimenez, Jesus Vicente</au><au>Garcia-Unanue, Jorge</au><au>Navandar, Archit</au><au>Viejo-Romero, David</au><au>Sanchez-Sanchez, Javier</au><au>Gallardo, Leonor</au><au>Hernandez-Martin, Antonio</au><au>Felipe, Jose Luis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison between Two Different Device Models 18 Hz GPS Used for Time-Motion Analyses in Ecological Testing of Football</atitle><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><date>2020-03-15</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1912</spage><pages>1912-</pages><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><eissn>1660-4601</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to compare the validity of two different GPS device models used for time-motion analyses in ecological testing of football. Ten healthy male players from a Spanish university football team participated in this study. The team sport simulation circuit (TSCC) used was based on previous research examining the validity and interunit reliability of different GPS systems. Participants were required to complete eight laps of the TSSC, resulting in a total distance of 1320 m. The GPS units used for the current study were the 18 Hz StatsSport Apex Pro and 18 Hz RealTrack WIMU Pro. Participants were required to wear either of the two GPS units during the test. To establish the construct validity of GPS as a measure of V , timing lights were used as a gold standard. The results clearly suggest that it is not possible to use the same 18 Hz GPS model or interchange it. The measurement can be considered precise when the noise is at least equal to or lower than the smallest worthwhile change. In this case, all standard deviation in measurement error was higher than the smallest worthwhile change. This is due to an inconsistency in the data processing of each trademark. It is important to prevent a club using different GPS trademarks at the same time, since it is not possible to compare in any case any type of result obtained between different trademarks.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>32183482</pmid><doi>10.3390/ijerph17061912</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0794-4042</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1741-5566</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6997-8099</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0017-0184</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2029-1277</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6296-6121</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1660-4601
ispartof International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020-03, Vol.17 (6), p.1912
issn 1660-4601
1661-7827
1660-4601
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7142465
source PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Accuracy
Australian football
Computer simulation
Data processing
Error analysis
Global positioning systems
GPS
Load
Physiology
Studies
Team sports
Trademarks
Validity
Values
Velocity
title Comparison between Two Different Device Models 18 Hz GPS Used for Time-Motion Analyses in Ecological Testing of Football
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T19%3A50%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20between%20Two%20Different%20Device%20Models%2018%20Hz%20GPS%20Used%20for%20Time-Motion%20Analyses%20in%20Ecological%20Testing%20of%20Football&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20environmental%20research%20and%20public%20health&rft.au=Gimenez,%20Jesus%20Vicente&rft.date=2020-03-15&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1912&rft.pages=1912-&rft.issn=1660-4601&rft.eissn=1660-4601&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ijerph17061912&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2378900227%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2379750604&rft_id=info:pmid/32183482&rfr_iscdi=true