Health research: what happened to the charcoal?

The report warns against complacency, against the whiggish view that things can only get better; that older customary traditional practices must always give way to the new, modern, and progressive. Yet the report's language is far from a call to arms. Its buzzword slogans about "more resea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Lancet (British edition) 2004-11, Vol.364 (9447), p.1735-1736
Hauptverfasser: Decosas, Josef, Heap, Simon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The report warns against complacency, against the whiggish view that things can only get better; that older customary traditional practices must always give way to the new, modern, and progressive. Yet the report's language is far from a call to arms. Its buzzword slogans about "more research for better health" trade in mood rather than critical thinking. Colourful but indistinct, the use of "mood" is a way of engineering consent, of selling ideas; a method of getting the audience to feel rather than understand. Furthermore, "mood" is powerfully addictive; those who trade in the word find it irresistible that you never need to define what you mean. We believe that making health policy and systems more evidence-based requires more than mood.
ISSN:0140-6736
1474-547X
DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17413-8