Health research: what happened to the charcoal?
The report warns against complacency, against the whiggish view that things can only get better; that older customary traditional practices must always give way to the new, modern, and progressive. Yet the report's language is far from a call to arms. Its buzzword slogans about "more resea...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Lancet (British edition) 2004-11, Vol.364 (9447), p.1735-1736 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The report warns against complacency, against the whiggish view that things can only get better; that older customary traditional practices must always give way to the new, modern, and progressive. Yet the report's language is far from a call to arms. Its buzzword slogans about "more research for better health" trade in mood rather than critical thinking. Colourful but indistinct, the use of "mood" is a way of engineering consent, of selling ideas; a method of getting the audience to feel rather than understand. Furthermore, "mood" is powerfully addictive; those who trade in the word find it irresistible that you never need to define what you mean. We believe that making health policy and systems more evidence-based requires more than mood. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0140-6736 1474-547X |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17413-8 |