Validation of an LC-MS/MS-based dilute-and-shoot approach for the quantification of > 500 mycotoxins and other secondary metabolites in food crops: challenges and solutions

This paper describes the validation of an LC-MS/MS-based method for the quantification of > 500 secondary microbial metabolites. Analytical performance parameters have been determined for seven food matrices using seven individual samples per matrix for spiking. Apparent recoveries ranged from 70...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry 2020-04, Vol.412 (11), p.2607-2620
Hauptverfasser: Sulyok, Michael, Stadler, David, Steiner, David, Krska, Rudolf
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2620
container_issue 11
container_start_page 2607
container_title Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry
container_volume 412
creator Sulyok, Michael
Stadler, David
Steiner, David
Krska, Rudolf
description This paper describes the validation of an LC-MS/MS-based method for the quantification of > 500 secondary microbial metabolites. Analytical performance parameters have been determined for seven food matrices using seven individual samples per matrix for spiking. Apparent recoveries ranged from 70 to 120% for 53–83% of all investigated analytes (depending on the matrix). This number increased to 84–94% if the recovery of extraction was considered. The comparison of the fraction of analytes for which the precision criterion of RSD ≤ 20% under repeatability conditions (for 7 replicates derived from different individual samples) and intermediate precision conditions (for 7 technical replicates from one sample), respectively, was met (85–97% vs. 93–94%) highlights the contribution of relative matrix effects to the method uncertainty. Statistical testing of apparent recoveries between pairs of matrices exhibited a significant difference for more than half of the analytes, while recoveries of the extraction showed a much better agreement. Apparent recoveries and matrix effects were found to be constant over 2–3 orders of magnitude of analyte concentrations in figs and maize, whereas the LOQs differed less than by a factor of 2 for 90% of the investigated compounds. Based on these findings, this paper discusses the applicability and practicability of current guidelines for multi-analyte method validation. Investigation of (apparent) recoveries near the LOQ seems to be insufficiently relevant to justify the enormous time-effort for manual inspection of the peaks of hundreds of analytes. Instead, more emphasis should be put on the investigation of relative matrix effects in the validation procedure. Graphical abstract
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00216-020-02489-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7136310</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A619660251</galeid><sourcerecordid>A619660251</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-c53af29def398f4d57902ba496a32008c1d55c3ce6b421a4462049241e79f2263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ks1u1DAUhSMEoqXwAiyQJdZpr53EiVlUqkb8SVOxKLC1HP_MuMrYU9tT0R3bvkwfiifhlpQBNihyEtnnfDq-OlX1ksIxBehPMgCjvAYGuNpB1OJRdUg5HWrGO3i8_2_ZQfUs50sA2g2UP60OGgb9gO7D6u6rmrxRxcdAoiMqkOWiPr84Ob-oR5WtIcZPu2JrFUyd1zEWorbbFJVeExcTKWtLrnYqFO-83lNOf3y_7QDI5kbHEr_5kBFsSER1ItnqGIxKN2Rjixrj5IvNxAfkRUN0itv8hui1miYbVnZ25oghEJ6fV0-cmrJ98fA9qr68e_t58aFefnr_cXG2rHXXQcF3oxwTxrpGDK41XS-AjaoVXOHVYdDUdJ1utOVjy6hqW86gFayltheOMd4cVaczd7sbN9ZoG0pSk9wmv8HkMiov_z0Jfi1X8Vr2tOENBQS8fgCkeLWzucjLuEsBM0vWDJz3jYB71fGsWqnJSh9cRJjGx9iNxzFZ53H_jFPBObCOooHNBpxTzsm6fSQK8r4Uci6FxFLIX6WQAk2v_r7M3vK7BShoZkHGIxx6-hP2P9ifFTvFXQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2386673900</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of an LC-MS/MS-based dilute-and-shoot approach for the quantification of &gt; 500 mycotoxins and other secondary metabolites in food crops: challenges and solutions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Sulyok, Michael ; Stadler, David ; Steiner, David ; Krska, Rudolf</creator><creatorcontrib>Sulyok, Michael ; Stadler, David ; Steiner, David ; Krska, Rudolf</creatorcontrib><description>This paper describes the validation of an LC-MS/MS-based method for the quantification of &gt; 500 secondary microbial metabolites. Analytical performance parameters have been determined for seven food matrices using seven individual samples per matrix for spiking. Apparent recoveries ranged from 70 to 120% for 53–83% of all investigated analytes (depending on the matrix). This number increased to 84–94% if the recovery of extraction was considered. The comparison of the fraction of analytes for which the precision criterion of RSD ≤ 20% under repeatability conditions (for 7 replicates derived from different individual samples) and intermediate precision conditions (for 7 technical replicates from one sample), respectively, was met (85–97% vs. 93–94%) highlights the contribution of relative matrix effects to the method uncertainty. Statistical testing of apparent recoveries between pairs of matrices exhibited a significant difference for more than half of the analytes, while recoveries of the extraction showed a much better agreement. Apparent recoveries and matrix effects were found to be constant over 2–3 orders of magnitude of analyte concentrations in figs and maize, whereas the LOQs differed less than by a factor of 2 for 90% of the investigated compounds. Based on these findings, this paper discusses the applicability and practicability of current guidelines for multi-analyte method validation. Investigation of (apparent) recoveries near the LOQ seems to be insufficiently relevant to justify the enormous time-effort for manual inspection of the peaks of hundreds of analytes. Instead, more emphasis should be put on the investigation of relative matrix effects in the validation procedure. Graphical abstract</description><identifier>ISSN: 1618-2642</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1618-2650</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00216-020-02489-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32078002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Agricultural industry ; Analytical Chemistry ; Biochemistry ; Characterization and Evaluation of Materials ; Chemistry ; Chemistry and Materials Science ; Chromatography, Liquid - methods ; Crops, Agricultural - chemistry ; Food ; Food Analysis - methods ; Food Science ; Inspection ; Investigations ; Laboratory Medicine ; Limit of Detection ; Mathematical analysis ; Metabolites ; Microorganisms ; Monitoring/Environmental Analysis ; Mycotoxins ; Mycotoxins - analysis ; Plant metabolites ; Research Paper ; Secondary metabolites ; Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization - methods ; Statistical methods ; Tandem Mass Spectrometry - methods ; Zea mays - chemistry</subject><ispartof>Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2020-04, Vol.412 (11), p.2607-2620</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-c53af29def398f4d57902ba496a32008c1d55c3ce6b421a4462049241e79f2263</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-c53af29def398f4d57902ba496a32008c1d55c3ce6b421a4462049241e79f2263</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3302-0732</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00216-020-02489-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00216-020-02489-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32078002$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sulyok, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stadler, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steiner, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krska, Rudolf</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of an LC-MS/MS-based dilute-and-shoot approach for the quantification of &gt; 500 mycotoxins and other secondary metabolites in food crops: challenges and solutions</title><title>Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry</title><addtitle>Anal Bioanal Chem</addtitle><addtitle>Anal Bioanal Chem</addtitle><description>This paper describes the validation of an LC-MS/MS-based method for the quantification of &gt; 500 secondary microbial metabolites. Analytical performance parameters have been determined for seven food matrices using seven individual samples per matrix for spiking. Apparent recoveries ranged from 70 to 120% for 53–83% of all investigated analytes (depending on the matrix). This number increased to 84–94% if the recovery of extraction was considered. The comparison of the fraction of analytes for which the precision criterion of RSD ≤ 20% under repeatability conditions (for 7 replicates derived from different individual samples) and intermediate precision conditions (for 7 technical replicates from one sample), respectively, was met (85–97% vs. 93–94%) highlights the contribution of relative matrix effects to the method uncertainty. Statistical testing of apparent recoveries between pairs of matrices exhibited a significant difference for more than half of the analytes, while recoveries of the extraction showed a much better agreement. Apparent recoveries and matrix effects were found to be constant over 2–3 orders of magnitude of analyte concentrations in figs and maize, whereas the LOQs differed less than by a factor of 2 for 90% of the investigated compounds. Based on these findings, this paper discusses the applicability and practicability of current guidelines for multi-analyte method validation. Investigation of (apparent) recoveries near the LOQ seems to be insufficiently relevant to justify the enormous time-effort for manual inspection of the peaks of hundreds of analytes. Instead, more emphasis should be put on the investigation of relative matrix effects in the validation procedure. Graphical abstract</description><subject>Agricultural industry</subject><subject>Analytical Chemistry</subject><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Characterization and Evaluation of Materials</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science</subject><subject>Chromatography, Liquid - methods</subject><subject>Crops, Agricultural - chemistry</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food Analysis - methods</subject><subject>Food Science</subject><subject>Inspection</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Laboratory Medicine</subject><subject>Limit of Detection</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Metabolites</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</subject><subject>Mycotoxins</subject><subject>Mycotoxins - analysis</subject><subject>Plant metabolites</subject><subject>Research Paper</subject><subject>Secondary metabolites</subject><subject>Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization - methods</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Tandem Mass Spectrometry - methods</subject><subject>Zea mays - chemistry</subject><issn>1618-2642</issn><issn>1618-2650</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ks1u1DAUhSMEoqXwAiyQJdZpr53EiVlUqkb8SVOxKLC1HP_MuMrYU9tT0R3bvkwfiifhlpQBNihyEtnnfDq-OlX1ksIxBehPMgCjvAYGuNpB1OJRdUg5HWrGO3i8_2_ZQfUs50sA2g2UP60OGgb9gO7D6u6rmrxRxcdAoiMqkOWiPr84Ob-oR5WtIcZPu2JrFUyd1zEWorbbFJVeExcTKWtLrnYqFO-83lNOf3y_7QDI5kbHEr_5kBFsSER1ItnqGIxKN2Rjixrj5IvNxAfkRUN0itv8hui1miYbVnZ25oghEJ6fV0-cmrJ98fA9qr68e_t58aFefnr_cXG2rHXXQcF3oxwTxrpGDK41XS-AjaoVXOHVYdDUdJ1utOVjy6hqW86gFayltheOMd4cVaczd7sbN9ZoG0pSk9wmv8HkMiov_z0Jfi1X8Vr2tOENBQS8fgCkeLWzucjLuEsBM0vWDJz3jYB71fGsWqnJSh9cRJjGx9iNxzFZ53H_jFPBObCOooHNBpxTzsm6fSQK8r4Uci6FxFLIX6WQAk2v_r7M3vK7BShoZkHGIxx6-hP2P9ifFTvFXQ</recordid><startdate>20200401</startdate><enddate>20200401</enddate><creator>Sulyok, Michael</creator><creator>Stadler, David</creator><creator>Steiner, David</creator><creator>Krska, Rudolf</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3302-0732</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200401</creationdate><title>Validation of an LC-MS/MS-based dilute-and-shoot approach for the quantification of &gt; 500 mycotoxins and other secondary metabolites in food crops: challenges and solutions</title><author>Sulyok, Michael ; Stadler, David ; Steiner, David ; Krska, Rudolf</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-c53af29def398f4d57902ba496a32008c1d55c3ce6b421a4462049241e79f2263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Agricultural industry</topic><topic>Analytical Chemistry</topic><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Characterization and Evaluation of Materials</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry and Materials Science</topic><topic>Chromatography, Liquid - methods</topic><topic>Crops, Agricultural - chemistry</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food Analysis - methods</topic><topic>Food Science</topic><topic>Inspection</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Laboratory Medicine</topic><topic>Limit of Detection</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Metabolites</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</topic><topic>Mycotoxins</topic><topic>Mycotoxins - analysis</topic><topic>Plant metabolites</topic><topic>Research Paper</topic><topic>Secondary metabolites</topic><topic>Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization - methods</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Tandem Mass Spectrometry - methods</topic><topic>Zea mays - chemistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sulyok, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stadler, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steiner, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krska, Rudolf</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sulyok, Michael</au><au>Stadler, David</au><au>Steiner, David</au><au>Krska, Rudolf</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation of an LC-MS/MS-based dilute-and-shoot approach for the quantification of &gt; 500 mycotoxins and other secondary metabolites in food crops: challenges and solutions</atitle><jtitle>Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry</jtitle><stitle>Anal Bioanal Chem</stitle><addtitle>Anal Bioanal Chem</addtitle><date>2020-04-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>412</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2607</spage><epage>2620</epage><pages>2607-2620</pages><issn>1618-2642</issn><eissn>1618-2650</eissn><abstract>This paper describes the validation of an LC-MS/MS-based method for the quantification of &gt; 500 secondary microbial metabolites. Analytical performance parameters have been determined for seven food matrices using seven individual samples per matrix for spiking. Apparent recoveries ranged from 70 to 120% for 53–83% of all investigated analytes (depending on the matrix). This number increased to 84–94% if the recovery of extraction was considered. The comparison of the fraction of analytes for which the precision criterion of RSD ≤ 20% under repeatability conditions (for 7 replicates derived from different individual samples) and intermediate precision conditions (for 7 technical replicates from one sample), respectively, was met (85–97% vs. 93–94%) highlights the contribution of relative matrix effects to the method uncertainty. Statistical testing of apparent recoveries between pairs of matrices exhibited a significant difference for more than half of the analytes, while recoveries of the extraction showed a much better agreement. Apparent recoveries and matrix effects were found to be constant over 2–3 orders of magnitude of analyte concentrations in figs and maize, whereas the LOQs differed less than by a factor of 2 for 90% of the investigated compounds. Based on these findings, this paper discusses the applicability and practicability of current guidelines for multi-analyte method validation. Investigation of (apparent) recoveries near the LOQ seems to be insufficiently relevant to justify the enormous time-effort for manual inspection of the peaks of hundreds of analytes. Instead, more emphasis should be put on the investigation of relative matrix effects in the validation procedure. Graphical abstract</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>32078002</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00216-020-02489-9</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3302-0732</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1618-2642
ispartof Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2020-04, Vol.412 (11), p.2607-2620
issn 1618-2642
1618-2650
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7136310
source MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals
subjects Agricultural industry
Analytical Chemistry
Biochemistry
Characterization and Evaluation of Materials
Chemistry
Chemistry and Materials Science
Chromatography, Liquid - methods
Crops, Agricultural - chemistry
Food
Food Analysis - methods
Food Science
Inspection
Investigations
Laboratory Medicine
Limit of Detection
Mathematical analysis
Metabolites
Microorganisms
Monitoring/Environmental Analysis
Mycotoxins
Mycotoxins - analysis
Plant metabolites
Research Paper
Secondary metabolites
Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization - methods
Statistical methods
Tandem Mass Spectrometry - methods
Zea mays - chemistry
title Validation of an LC-MS/MS-based dilute-and-shoot approach for the quantification of > 500 mycotoxins and other secondary metabolites in food crops: challenges and solutions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T10%3A15%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20an%20LC-MS/MS-based%20dilute-and-shoot%20approach%20for%20the%20quantification%20of%20%3E%E2%80%89500%20mycotoxins%20and%20other%20secondary%20metabolites%20in%20food%20crops:%20challenges%20and%20solutions&rft.jtitle=Analytical%20and%20bioanalytical%20chemistry&rft.au=Sulyok,%20Michael&rft.date=2020-04-01&rft.volume=412&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2607&rft.epage=2620&rft.pages=2607-2620&rft.issn=1618-2642&rft.eissn=1618-2650&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00216-020-02489-9&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA619660251%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2386673900&rft_id=info:pmid/32078002&rft_galeid=A619660251&rfr_iscdi=true